fine-scale kinematic structure of a gravity wave within a midlatitude

1
MU Soundings KLOT MIPS MAX 35 km Fine-scale kinematic structure of a gravity wave within a midlatitude cyclone P11.13 Introduction The primary objective of this work is to improve understanding of the kinematics of gravity waves within midlatitude cyclones. This work has important applications to recent research examining the relationship between gravity waves and mesocyclones within supercell storms. A primary hypothe- sis is that ducted gravity waves can simultaneously enhance horizontal vorticity, tilt it into the verti- cal, and then amplify it via stretching. Better observations of the evolving thermodynamic environ- ment and internal structure of gravity waves are required, and we strive to obtain these observations as part of a field campaign entitle Profiling of Winter Storms, or PlOWS. The PlOWS observational assets are well-suited to obtain comprehensive measurements of gravity waves and their environment. In this paper, we present preliminary observations of two major duct- ed gravity waves observed during the first IOP of the PlOWS pilot study on 11 February 2009. The primary field campaign will occur between 1 November 2009 and 1 March 2010. MU Soundings MIPS MAX 30-40 km baseline WSR-88D MISS (915 MHz profiler + soundings) RHI RHI 540 546 552 558 564 570 576 582 588 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 a) 500 hPa geopotential height and temperature b) Sea level pressure (hPa) and surface temperature (C) 300 200 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 100 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 28 20 0.4 1 2 5 3 8 12 20 PlOWS Sounding 1722 UTC PlOWS domain 0827 UTC PlOWS domain 1726 UTC Warm frontal band Dry slot Deformation Zone Gravity Wave 1 Gravity Wave 2 915 MHz SNR 915 MHz W Overview Composite radar at the times of passage of gravity waves 1 and 2 are shown above. The first gravity wave preceded the warm frontal precipitation band, while the second occurred within the dry slot near the times shown. The white dot indicates the location of the PlOWS domain. Time vs. height section of vertical beam measurements from the MIPS 915 MHz wind profiler during the cyclone passage. Signal-to-noise ratio is shown on the left, Triangles indicate times of sounding releases. Doppler velocity (W = w + V T ) is shown on the right, with the gravity wave passage times annotated. Gravity wave 1 high frequency oscillations within precipitation GW1 SNR W Laminar flow inferred duct layer KLOT PPI, 0.5 o 0835 UTC MAX, MIPS KLOT PPI, 3.4 o 0836 UTC MAX, MIPS . V/z = 30 m/s / 20 km sin(3.4 o ) = 30 m/s / 1.2 km Gravity wave 1 was sampled by the MIPS and KLOT radar, but surface data were not yet available to docu- ment the surface pressure oscillation. Since the first sounding was 3 h later, the environment in advance of the warm frontal precipitation band was not well defined, but we are reasonably certain that the gravity wave shown in the right panel (above) was located within a well-defined duct. The variation in vertical motion (right) was about +/- 3 m/s. The 915 SNR enhanced backscat- ter centered near 2 km implies a gradient in refractive index (and hence a possible duct). The W pattern is laminar below this stable layer, and turbulent above 2 km within the conditionally unstable layer. The wave does not have a signature in the WSR-88D Z or Vr fields (below). The precipitation pattern is cellular, and a sig- nificant shear layer is centered near 4 km AGL, where the flow increases by ~30 m/s over a vertical depth of 1.2 km (shear value is 2.5 x 10 -2 s -1 ). 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 wind speed (m/s) pressure (mb) 966 968 970 972 974 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 90 180 270 360 time (UTC) wind direction Experimental Design The PlOWS will include both ground-based mobile platforms and the NCAR C-130 aircraft equipped with an array of cloud physics probes, the Wyoming Cloud Radar, and the Wyoming Cloud Lidar. The ground-bases assets include a WSR-88D radar which serves as one of 12 anchor points includng Omaha, Minneapolis, Des Moines, LaCrosse, Milwaukee, Davenport, Chicago, Lincoln, St. Louis, northern Indiana, Indianapolis, and Evansville. Other mobile assets will complete a meso-γ- scale network that will cover a domain of ~2000 km 2 . The Mobile Alabama X-band (MAX) dual polarization radar will form a dual Doppler network with a baseline of 30-40 km, as shown in the fig- ures below. The Mobile Integrated Profiling System (MIPS) will be placed on one dual Doppler lobe, and the NCAR Mobile Integrated Sounding System will be located in the other. The MIPS will include a 915 MHz wind profiler, an X-band profiling radar, a microwave profiling radiometer, and a lidar ceilometer. Surface instrumentation will consist of a Parsivel disdrometer, a snowflake imager, and conventional meteorological instrumentation. The University of Missouri sounding system will be co-located with the MIPS. The MIPS, MAX, and MISS sites will also include electric field mills. Generic experimental design for the primary PlOWS filed campaign between 1 Nov 2009 and 1 Mar 2010 Experimental design for the pilot PlOWS field phase on 11 February 2009. The MIPS and MAX were co-located for comparison between MAX and 915 MHz wind profiler vertically- pointing measurements Synoptic setting Figures on the right show the 500 hPa analyhsis (top) and surface analysis (bottom) at 0600 UTC, 11 February 2009. The 500 hPa chart includes geopotential height and iso- therms. The surface analysis includes sea level pressure isobars drawn every 2 hPa and isotherms drawn at 2 o C intervals. In this case, an intensifying cyclone located over Missouri passed just south of the PlOWS experimental domain, marked with a dot in the top panel. Due to warm temperatures at lower levels, all precipitation at the surface was rain. Kevin Knupp 1 , Dustin Phillips 1 , Tim Coleman 1 , Robert Rauber 2 and Brian Jewett 2 1 University of Alabama in Huntsville 2 University of Illinois The figure above is a time series of profiler moments (SNR, top; W, middle; and spec- trum width, bottom) at the 1.9 km level (refer to figure above this one). The gravity wave exhibits a period of about 20 min. Gravity wave 2 Gravity wave 2 occurred within the dry slot very near the time of a sounding release 20 km to the NNW. The sounding shows a prominent duct below 740 mb (~2.4 km AGL), which is shown in the SNR t-z section above as a red line segment. The sounding is generally isothermal between 900 and 740 hPa, and the top of a shallow boundary layer is indicated near 900 hPa. The SNR t-z sec- tion indicates a variable height of the duct layer. Interestingly, the dry slot is filled with scattered pre- cipitation columns most prominent within the 3-6 km AGL layer. The W t-z section (above right) indi- cates a weaker oscillation in W when compared to gravity wave 1. Time series of pressure indicate one prominent wave with initial and secondary crests occurring near 1655 and 1745 UTC, yielding a period of about 50 min. The surface wind shows a corresponding oscillation consistent with that of a ducted wave, with the peak wind occurring near the time of the trough and a minimum wind speed near the time of the ridge (maximum p). The KLOT Z and Vr images below indicate that wave activity was prominent around this time. A wave train consisting of 7 maxima in Z is indicated south of KLOT in the 0.5 o PPI scan at 1703 UTC. The p time series reveals only subtle variations prior to 1702, and modest variations after 1800 UTC. The major pressure oscillation did not exhibit a prominent low-level signature in either the KLOT or MAX radar Z or Vr fields. Rather, a linear Z feature at higher levels corresponds to this major pressure oscillation. It is also noted in the 915 SNR t-z section as the vertical column between 1.5 and 5 km AGL at about 1715 UTC. The base of this column is close to the duct level. The linear structure of this feature is shown below (right) in the 4.3 o PPI at 1715 UTC. duct shallow boundary layer Summary In this case two major gravity waves were observed, one at the leading edge of the warm frontal precipitation band, and the other within the dry slot. In general, gravity wave activity within the dry slot was common. A more extended analysis of this event will investigate the forcing mechnanisms of these gravity waves, which is not clear from this preliminary analysis. The PlOWS data sets will provide a very comprehensive data set on fine details of gravity waves and their evolving mesoscale environment over a domain that offers very high temporal and spatial resolution of both the kinematics and thermodynamics. KLOT reflectivity factor 1702:41, 0.5 o 1714:35, 4.3 o MAX, MIPS MAX, MIPS G 34th Conference on Radar Meteorology, October 5-9, 2009

Upload: others

Post on 15-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fine-scale kinematic structure of a gravity wave within a midlatitude

MU Soundings

KLOT

MIPSMAX

35 km

Fine-scale kinematic structure of a gravity wave within a midlatitude cycloneP11.13

Introduction

The primary objective of this work is to improve understanding of the kinematics of gravity waveswithin midlatitude cyclones. This work has important applications to recent research examining therelationship between gravity waves and mesocyclones within supercell storms. A primary hypothe-sis is that ducted gravity waves can simultaneously enhance horizontal vorticity, tilt it into the verti-cal, and then amplify it via stretching. Better observations of the evolving thermodynamic environ-ment and internal structure of gravity waves are required, and we strive to obtain theseobservations as part of a field campaign entitle Profiling of Winter Storms, or PlOWS.

The PlOWS observational assets are well-suited to obtain comprehensive measurements of gravitywaves and their environment. In this paper, we present preliminary observations of two major duct-ed gravity waves observed during the first IOP of the PlOWS pilot study on 11 February 2009. Theprimary field campaign will occur between 1 November 2009 and 1 March 2010.

MU Soundings

MIPS

MAX

30-4

0km

base

line

WSR-88D

MISS(915 MHz profiler +

soundings)

RHI

RHI

540

546

552

558

564

570

576582

588

-22

-20

-18 -16

-14

-12

a) 500 hPa geopotential height and temperature

b) Sea level pressure (hPa) and surface temperature (C)

300

200

400

500

600

700

800900

1000

100

403020100-10-20-30

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40

2820

0.4 1 2 53 8 12 20

PlOWS Sounding1722 UTC

PlOWS domain

0827 UTCPlOWS domain

1726 UTC

Warm frontal band Dry slot DeformationZone

Gravity Wave 1

Gravity Wave 2

915 MHz SNR 915 MHz W

Overview

Composite radar at the times of passage of gravity waves 1 and 2 are shown above. The first gravitywave preceded the warm frontal precipitation band, while the second occurred within the dry slot nearthe times shown. The white dot indicates the location of the PlOWS domain.

Time vs. height section of vertical beam measurements from the MIPS 915 MHz wind profiler during thecyclone passage. Signal-to-noise ratio is shown on the left, Triangles indicate times of sounding releases.Doppler velocity (W = w + VT) is shown on the right, with the gravity wave passage times annotated.

Gravity wave 1

high frequency oscillations within precipitation

GW1

SNR W

Laminar flow

inferred duct layer

KLOT PPI, 0.5o

0835 UTC

MAX, MIPS

KLOT PPI, 3.4o

0836 UTC

MAX, MIPS

.

∆V/∆z = 30 m/s / 20 km sin(3.4o)= 30 m/s / 1.2 km

Gravity wave 1 was sampled by the MIPS and KLOTradar, but surface data were not yet available to docu-ment the surface pressure oscillation. Since the firstsounding was 3 h later, the environment in advance ofthe warm frontal precipitation band was not well defined,but we are reasonably certain that the gravity waveshown in the right panel (above) was located within awell-defined duct. The variation in vertical motion (right)was about +/- 3 m/s. The 915 SNR enhanced backscat-ter centered near 2 km implies a gradient in refractiveindex (and hence a possible duct). The W pattern islaminar below this stable layer, and turbulent above 2km within the conditionally unstable layer. The wavedoes not have a signature in the WSR-88D Z or Vr fields(below). The precipitation pattern is cellular, and a sig-nificant shear layer is centered near 4 km AGL, wherethe flow increases by ~30 m/s over a vertical depth of1.2 km (shear value is 2.5 x 10-2 s-1).

0

2

4

6

810

1214

wind speed (m/s)

pressure (mb)

966

968

970

972

974

15 16 17 18 19 200

90

180

270

360

time (UTC)

wind direction

Experimental DesignThe PlOWS will include both ground-based mobile platforms and the NCAR C-130 aircraft equippedwith an array of cloud physics probes, the Wyoming Cloud Radar, and the Wyoming Cloud Lidar.The ground-bases assets include a WSR-88D radar which serves as one of 12 anchor pointsincludng Omaha, Minneapolis, Des Moines, LaCrosse, Milwaukee, Davenport, Chicago, Lincoln, St.Louis, northern Indiana, Indianapolis, and Evansville. Other mobile assets will complete a meso-γ-scale network that will cover a domain of ~2000 km2. The Mobile Alabama X-band (MAX) dualpolarization radar will form a dual Doppler network with a baseline of 30-40 km, as shown in the fig-ures below. The Mobile Integrated Profiling System (MIPS) will be placed on one dual Doppler lobe,and the NCAR Mobile Integrated Sounding System will be located in the other. The MIPS willinclude a 915 MHz wind profiler, an X-band profiling radar, a microwave profiling radiometer, and alidar ceilometer. Surface instrumentation will consist of a Parsivel disdrometer, a snowflake imager,and conventional meteorological instrumentation. The University of Missouri sounding system willbe co-located with the MIPS. The MIPS, MAX, and MISS sites will also include electric field mills.

Generic experimental design for the primaryPlOWS filed campaign between 1 Nov 2009and 1 Mar 2010

Experimental design for the pilot PlOWS fieldphase on 11 February 2009. The MIPS andMAX were co-located for comparison betweenMAX and 915 MHz wind profiler vertically-pointing measurements

Synoptic settingFigures on the r igh t show the 500 hPaanalyhsis (top) and surface analysis (bottom) at0600 UTC, 11 February 2009. The 500 hPachart includes geopotential height and iso-therms. The surface analysis includes sealevel pressure isobars drawn every 2 hPa andisotherms drawn at 2 oC intervals. In this case,an intensifying cyclone located over Missouripassed just south of the PlOWS experimentaldomain, marked with a dot in the top panel.Due to warm temperatures at lower levels, allprecipitation at the surface was rain.

Kevin Knupp1, Dustin Phillips1, Tim Coleman1, Robert Rauber2 and Brian Jewett21University of Alabama in Huntsville

2University of Illinois

The figure above is a time series of profilermoments (SNR, top; W, middle; and spec-trum width, bottom) at the 1.9 km level(refer to figure above this one). The gravitywave exhibits a period of about 20 min.

Gravity wave 2

Gravity wave 2 occurred within the dry slot very near the time of a sounding release 20 km to theNNW. The sounding shows a prominent duct below 740 mb (~2.4 km AGL), which is shown in theSNR t-z section above as a red line segment. The sounding is generally isothermal between 900and 740 hPa, and the top of a shallow boundary layer is indicated near 900 hPa. The SNR t-z sec-tion indicates a variable height of the duct layer. Interestingly, the dry slot is filled with scattered pre-cipitation columns most prominent within the 3-6 km AGL layer. The W t-z section (above right) indi-cates a weaker oscillation in W when compared to gravity wave 1. Time series of pressure indicateone prominent wave with initial and secondary crests occurring near 1655 and 1745 UTC, yielding aperiod of about 50 min. The surface wind shows a corresponding oscillation consistent with that of aducted wave, with the peak wind occurring near the time of the trough and a minimum wind speednear the time of the ridge (maximum p).

The KLOT Z and Vr images below indicate that wave activity was prominent around this time. Awave train consisting of 7 maxima in Z is indicated south of KLOT in the 0.5o PPI scan at 1703 UTC.The p time series reveals only subtle variations prior to 1702, and modest variations after 1800UTC. The major pressure oscillation did not exhibit a prominent low-level signature in either theKLOT or MAX radar Z or Vr fields. Rather, a linear Z feature at higher levels corresponds to thismajor pressure oscillation. It is also noted in the 915 SNR t-z section as the vertical columnbetween 1.5 and 5 km AGL at about 1715 UTC. The base of this column is close to the duct level.The linear structure of this feature is shown below (right) in the 4.3o PPI at 1715 UTC.

ductshallow boundary layer

SummaryIn this case two major gravity waves were observed, one at the leading edge of the warm frontalprecipitation band, and the other within the dry slot. In general, gravity wave activity within the dryslot was common. A more extended analysis of this event will investigate the forcing mechnanismsof these gravity waves, which is not clear from this preliminary analysis.

The PlOWS data sets will provide a very comprehensive data set on fine details of gravity wavesand their evolving mesoscale environment over a domain that offers very high temporal and spatialresolution of both the kinematics and thermodynamics.

KLOT reflectivity factor

1702:41, 0.5o 1714:35, 4.3o

MAX, MIPSMAX, MIPS

G

34th Conference on Radar Meteorology, October 5-9, 2009