finding faults with lidar in the puget lowland ralph haugerud, craig weaver u. s. geological survey...
Post on 20-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Finding faults with LIDAR in the Puget Lowland
Ralph Haugerud, Craig WeaverU. S. Geological Survey
Jerry HarlessPuget Sound Regional Council
and thanks to TerraPoint LLC, Houston TX
• Why LIDAR?
• What is LIDAR?
• How are we doing LIDAR?• What are we finding?
30 km
In some places, it
is easy to see where
the active faults
are.
In other places,
it is not.
30 km
Seattle
Tacoma
What are the salient differences?
SF Bay
area
Puget
Lowland
slip rate3 cm/yr
strike slip4 mm/yr
shortening
average tree height
? 10 ft ? 100 ft
age of landscape
~106 years
18,000 years
18,000 yr 1 mm/yr = 18 m106 yr 1 mm/yr = 1 km
In the Puget Lowland, to see a fault with the same slip rate as in the SF Bay area, we have to look more closely.
age slip rate = feature size
LIght Detection And Ranging• Airborne scanning laser
rangefinder• Differential GPS• Inertial Navigation System
30,000 points per second at ~15 cm accuracy
• $400–$1000/mi2, 106 points/mi2, or 0.04–0.1 cents/point
Extensive filtering to remove tree canopy (virtual defor-estation)
10-meter DEM from contours
12-ft DEM from LIDAR
Picture: Oblique view of S end Rockaway Beach
High-resolution LIDAR topography
• Fly in winter, when leaves are off
• Near-infrared laser; doesn’t penetrate clouds, rain
• Errors
Largest are in angles—up to 1 m x-y error
Ranging error = ~15 cm z error!
• 2/3 of surveyed points on trees and buildings; remove with automatic geometric filtering
• Multiple reflections from one laser pulse = better filtering
• Optimum working distance circa 1 km– Adequate reflection brightness– Keep laser eye-safe
• Spot diameter: decimeters to meters• Spot spacing: 1 to 5 meters• Multiple passes
– multiple look angles– higher point density– internal consistency check
• $400 - $1,000 / mi2
Why is LIDAR better than photogrammetry?(It’s the trees)
Suppose timber allows 1 of 3 arbitrary rays to reach ground; 1/3 of ground can be surveyed by LIDAR
Photogrammetry requires 2 separate views of a point; only 1/9 of ground will be locatable
Bainbridge Island,KPUD
1996-1997
Snoqualmie,USGS-NMD1998-2001?
Seattle
Tacoma
Puget Sound LIDAR Consortium
Participants Expertise
•Kitsap County•Kitsap PUD•City of Seattle•Puget Sound Regional Council•NASA •USGS
(exclusive of USGS) –Contracting
–Surveyor
–prior LIDAR experience
–Geologist
–GIS
Puget Sound LIDAR Consortium
• No formal structure• One agenda• One contract• Separate payments• Share data• Release all data to public domain
(www.GetItYourselfBob, to be hosted by UW library)
PSLC
Tacoma
Seattle
Tacoma
Seattle
LIDAR already flown
to be flown this
Winter ~$3.3M
~$3M
Toe Jam Hill fault scarp
Waterman Point scarp
beach uplifted during 900 AD
earthquake
15 km west of Seattle
landslides
southern Bainbridge Island
Uses for high-resolution topography
• Finding faults (earthquake frequency, kinematics)
• Geologic mapping• Landslide hazards• Flood hazards, groundwater infiltration,
runoff modelling• Fish habitat? Precision forestry? Noise propagation