financial statement analysis.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
EXC 3451
Financial Statement Analysis
Basics of financial statement analysis
• Every item reported in a financial statement has significance.
• Various analytical techniques are used to evaluate the
significance of financial statement data.
Basics of financial statement analysis
• Analyzing financial statements involves:
Characteristics Comparison
Bases
Tools of
Analysis
Liquidity
Profitability
Solvency
Intracompany
Industry
averages
Intercompany
Horizontal
Vertical
Ratio
Basics of financial statement analysis
• Analyzing financial statements involves evaluating 3
characteristics:
1. Liquidity: ability of a firm to pay its financial
obligations when they come due.
2. Profitability: indicates the ability if a firm to survive
over a long period of time.
3. Solvency: the ability of a firm to meet its long-
term financial obligations
Basics of financial statement analysis
• Tools of analysis:
– Horizontal analysis: evaluates a series of financial statements
over time. Used primarily in intracompany comparisons.
– Vertical analysis: evaluates financial statement data by
expressing each financial item as a percentage of a base
amount. Used in both intra- and intercompany analysis.
– Ratio analysis: expresses the relationship among selected items
of financial statement data. Used in intra- and inter company as
well as in industry average comparisons.
Horizontal analysis
• Horizontal analysis, also called trend analysis, is a technique for
evaluating a series of financial statement data over a period of time.
• Purpose is to determine the increase or decrease that has taken
place.
• Commonly applied to the statement of financial position,
income statement, and retained earnings statement.
𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 =𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡 − 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡
𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑 =𝐶𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡
Horizontal analysis
Changes suggest that the
company expanded its
asset base during 2014
and financed this
expansion primarily by
retaining income rather
than assuming additional
long-term debt.
Illustration 14-5
Horizontal analysis of
statements of financial
position
Horizontal analysis
Overall, gross profit and net
income were up
substantially. Gross profit
increased
17.1%, and net income,
26.5%. Quality’s profit trend
appears favorable.
Illustration 14-6
Horizontal analysis of
Income statements
Horizontal analysis
In the horizontal analysis of the statement of financial position the
ending retained earnings increased 38.6%. As indicated earlier, the
company retained a significant portion of net income to finance
additional plant facilities.
Illustration 14-7
Horizontal analysis
of
retained earnings
statements
Horizontal analysis EXERCISE: Summary financial information for Rosepatch Company is
as follows:
Compute the amount and percentage changes in 2014 using horizontal
analysis, assuming 2013 is the base year.
December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013
Property, Plant and Equipment $ 300,000 $ 250,000
Current assets 100,000 76,500
Total assets 400,000 326,500
Vertical analysis • Vertical analysis, also called common-size analysis, is a
technique that expresses each financial statement item as a
percent of a base amount.
• On an income statement, we might say that selling expenses
are 16% of net sales.
• On a statement of financial position, we might say that current
assets are 22% of total assets.
• Vertical analysis is commonly applied to the statement of
financial position and the income statement.
Vertical analysis
These results reinforce
the earlier observations
that Quality is
choosing to finance
its growth through
retention of earnings
rather than through
issuing additional
debt.
Illustration 14-8
Vertical analysis of
statements of financial
position
Vertical analysis
Quality appears
to be a profitable
enterprise that is
becoming even more
successful.
Illustration 14-9
Vertical analysis of
Income statements
Vertical analysis
• Enables a comparison of companies of different sizes.
Illustration 14-10
Intercompany income
statement comparison
Vertical analysis • Let’s solve together problem 14-1 a):
a) Prepare a vertical analysis of the 2014 income statement and statements of
financial position data for both firms.
Lionel Company Barrymore Company
2014 2013 2014 2013
Net sales $1,549,035 $339,038
Costs of goods sold
1,053,345 237,325
Operating expenses
278,825 77,979
Interest expense
7,745
2,034
Income tax expense
61,960
8,476
Plant assets (net)
596,920 575,610 142,842 128,927
Current assets
401,584 388,020 86,450 82,581
Share capital-ordinary, $5 par
578,765 578,765 137,435 137,435
Retained earnings
252,224 225,358 55,528 47,430
Non-current liabilities
102,500
84,000 16,711 11,989
Current liabilities
65,015
75,507 19,618 14,654
Ratio Analysis
• Ratio analysis expresses the relationship among selected items
of financial statement data.
• We can express them as:
– Percentage (74%)
– Rate (0.74)
– Proportion (.74:1)
• A ratio on its own does not mean much. We can use them:
– Intracompany comparisons
– Industry average comparisons
– Intercompany comparisons
Ratio Analysis
Liquidity Profitability Solvency
Measure short-term
ability of the
company to pay its
maturing obligations
and to meet
unexpected needs
for cash.
Financial Ratio Classifications
Measure the
income or operating
success of a
company for a
given period of
time.
Measure the ability
of the company to
survive over a long
period of time.
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
• Measure the short-term ability of the company to pay its
maturing obligations and to meet unexpected needs for cash.
– Short-term creditors such as bankers and suppliers are
particularly interested in assessing liquidity.
– Ratios include the current ratio, the acid-test ratio,
receivable turnover, and inventory turnover.
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
What does this mean? Ratio of 2.96:1 means that for every dollar of current
liabilities, Quality has $2.96 of current assets.
Any trend analysis should be done with care because the ratio is susceptible to quick Changes and is easily influenced by management.
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
Acid-Test ratio measures immediate liquidity.
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
• We can measure liquidity by how quickly a firm can convert certain assets to cash. • Accounts receivable turnover measures the number of times, on average, the company collects receivables during the period. • Unless seasonal factors are significant, average net accounts receivable can be computed from the beginning and ending balances of the net accounts receivables.
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
• A variant of the Accounts Receivable Turnover ratio is to convert it to
an average collection period in terms of days.
• Receivables are collected every 35.78 days
365 days / 10.2 times = every 35.78 days
Ratio Analysis: Liquidity ratios
• Measures the number of times, on average, the inventory is sold during the period.
• A variant of inventory turnover is the days in inventory.
• Inventory turnover ratios vary considerably among industries.
365 days / 2.3 times = every 159 days
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• Measure the income or operating success of a company for a
given period of time.
– Income, or the lack of it, affects the company’s ability to obtain
debt and equity financing, liquidity position, and the ability to
grow.
– Ratios include the profit margin, asset turnover, return on
assets, return on ordinary shareholders’ equity, earnings per
share, price-earnings, and payout ratio.
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• Measures the percentage of each dollar of sales that results in net income.
• High inventory turnover businesses, such as grocery stores, generally
experience low profit margins. Low inventory turnover businesses, have high
profit margins.
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• Measures how efficiently a company uses its assets to generate
sales.
• Asset turnover ratios vary considerably among industries.
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• How many dollars of profit can we generate for every dollar invested
in assets?
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• Shows how many euros of net income the company earned for each
euro invested by the owners.
• Why is ROE>ROA in this case? Leverage.
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• How much net income has been earned on each ordinary share?
• It is meaningless to compare EPS with other firms because it
depends on the number of shares outstanding. The only meaningful
comparison is intracompany.
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• What does the market think about the firm’s future earnings?
Ratio Analysis: Profitability ratios
• It measures the percentage of earnings distributed in the form of
cash dividends.
• High growth firms tend to have low payout ratios. Why?
Ratio Analysis: Solvency ratios
• Solvency ratios measure the ability of a company to
survive over a long period of time.
• Long-term creditors and shareholders are particularly
interested in a company’s ability to pay interest as it
comes due and to repay the face value of debt at
maturity.
Ratio Analysis: Solvency ratios
• Measures the percentage of the total assets that creditors provide.
• It indicates the firm’s leverage.
• It has a direct influence on risk, which at the same time has an impact on the shareholders’ required rate of return.
• On one side interest on debt is tax deductible, on the other, it increases the risk of the firm. This is the basis of the trade-off theory of capital structure (Kraus and Litzenberger, 1973).
• Stable earnings usually are connected to higher leverage. Why?
Ratio Analysis: Solvency ratios
• Provides an indication of the company’s ability to meet interest
payments as they come due.
Ratio analysis • Let’s solve together problem 14-1 b):
b) Comment on the relative profitability of the companies by computing the
ROA and the ROE for both firms..
Lionel Company Barrymore Company
2014 2013 2014 2013
Net sales $1,549,035 $339,038
Costs of goods sold
1,053,345 237,325
Operating expenses
278,825 77,979
Interest expense
7,745
2,034
Income tax expense
61,960
8,476
Plant assets (net)
596,920 575,610 142,842 128,927
Current assets
401,584 388,020 86,450 82,581
Share capital-ordinary, $5 par
578,765 578,765 137,435 137,435
Retained earnings
252,224 225,358 55,528 47,430
Non-current liabilities
102,500
84,000 16,711 11,989
Current liabilities
65,015
75,507 19,618 14,654