financial innovation in afghanistan

Upload: zarif-aminyar

Post on 04-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Financial Innovation in Afghanistan

    1/3

  • 8/13/2019 Financial Innovation in Afghanistan

    2/3

    Source: Economics of Banking by Kent Mathews and John Thompson (2005)

    Zachary J. Gubler (2011) believes that financial innovation should be understood first

    and foremost as a process of change, a change in the type and variety of available

    financial products to be sure, but also a change in financial intermediaries (such as

    banks) and in markets, themselves.

    The Modern financial innovation process based on Zachary J. Gubler

    The figure below indicates that financial products migrate away from financial

    intermediaries (located in the lower left- hand corner of the grid) and toward

    markets (located in the upper right hand corner of the grid) when they exhibit

    increasing information symmetry between intermediaries and investors (as reflected

    by the arrow on the Y axis) and increasing standardization of terms (as reflected by

    the arrow on the X axis). The migration of CDOs (Collateralized Debt Obligation)

    away from banks is represented by its location closer to the market corner of the

    grid. Note that CDOs are not located all the way at the upper right hand corner of

    the grid, where the terms exchange and CCPs (Centralized Clearing Parties) arefound, because CDOs have not yet migrated to these market institutions. Finally,

    note that credit default swaps, particularly those that are tied to CDOs and discussed

    above, are still in a nascent, testing stage, embedded in relationships with financial

    intermediaries. This diagram thus captures in broad strokes the intuitions regarding

    the financial innovation process as developed in this subpart. The next subpart

    discusses how the financial innovation process affects products, institutions, and

    markets. In short, the process itself may lead to increased complexity in products

    and institutions and create certain fragilities within the new markets created by the

    market migration process.

    Principle Forms of Structured Change in Ba

    due to Financial Innovation

    According to Goodhart (1984) there are t

    principal forms of structural change du

    financial innovation. They are in turn:

    (1) The switch from asset management to lia

    management.

    (2) The development of variable rate lending

    (3) The introduction of cash manage

    technology.

    Asset management fitted easily into the pos

    world of bank balance sheets swollen with p

    sector debt and quantitative controls on

    lending. The basic idea behind the conce

    asset management is that banks manage

    assets regarding duration and type of len

    subject to the constraint provided by

    holdings of reserve assets. The move to lia

    management (namely, their ability to c

    liabilities by, for example, borrowing in the bank market) came in the USA by b

    borrowing from the offshore euro dollar m

    (often from their own overseas branches)

    attempt to circumvent the restriction

    regulation Q. The ceiling on the rate payab

    deposits drove savers to invest in securities

    mutual funds. In the UK, liability manage

    was given a boost with the Competition

    Credit Control Act 1971. With asset managem

    the total quantity of bank loans was controll

    restriction and deposits were supplied pas

    to the banking system.

    From the other side volatile inflation and int

    rates during the 1970s led to the fu

    development of variable rate lending. Blue

    customers always had access to over

    facilities at variable rates but during the 1

    more and more companies switched to var

    rate loans (linked to the London Inter-Bank

    Rate - LIBOR). Banks were able to len

    customers subject to risk, competitive pre

    and marginal costs of lending. The total sto

    bank loans became determined by the dem

    for bank credit (this implies a near-horizsupply of bank loans curve). The developme

    liability management and variable rate lendin

    to the rapid expansion of bank balance sh

    Banks managing their liabilities by alt

    interest rates on deposits and borrowing from

    inter-bank market satisfied the demand for

    loans. Thus, the simplest type of fina

    innovation was the development of inte

    bearing demand deposits which enabled ban

    manage liability.

  • 8/13/2019 Financial Innovation in Afghanistan

    3/3

    The pace of technological innovation in banking has seen the development of new financial products that have also

    resulted in a decline in unit costs to their suppliers - the banks. Credit cards, Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT),

    Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), Point Of Sale (POS) machines have had the dual effect of improving consumer

    cash management techniques and reducing the costs of delivery of cash management services. A good example is

    the use of debit cards over cheques. The costs of clearing a cheque are 35p per item compared with 7p per debit

    card transaction. (Association of Payment Clearing Services information oce, www.apacs.org.uk)

    Financial Innovation in AfghanistanAfghan modern banking industry is still very infant, hence we are still not in the position where we could expect

    financial innovations should generate from Afghanistan, but certainly we can rely on extension or imitation of a

    financial product that already existed in advanced countries or countries with a full fledge functioning banking

    industry . Looking at recent history of Afghan banking industry one can easily finds out that imitation of financial

    products have been effective in Afghanistan, though bundled with several challenges. It wont be exaggeration if

    we insist to say that the entire modern banking industry of Afghanistan is imitated. When a financial product is to

    be imitated one acute concern would be research and analysis about the target market and contextualization of

    the product based on findings. Another perilous problem would be the capacity of central bank of Afghanistan

    (DAB) to effectively monitor and supervise these innovations, because some of the recent cases in banking sector

    of Afghanistan indicate that the afghan regulators and policy makers are still to bring reforms in the system and

    improve their own capacity.

    Conclusion

    Financial innovation is much overused banking terminology. Financial innovation has been used to describe any

    change in the scale, scope and delivery of financial services. Many scholars have highlighted the importance of

    financial innovation. Three are three interacting forces behind any financial innovations i.e. instability, regulation

    and technology. The process of financial innovation is depending on the three interacting forces based or

    according to Zachary J. Gubler financial innovation should be understood first and foremost as a process of

    change, a change in the type and variety of available financial products to be sure, but also a change in financial

    intermediaries (such as banks) and in markets, themselves. Goodhart (1984) identified three principal forms of

    structural change in banking due to financial innovations which are (1) the switch from asset management to

    liability management (2) the development of variable rate lending (3) the introduction of cash management

    technology.

    To conclude, financial innovation is indispensable to banking, however we have to be enough vigilant about theseinnovations, because recently some of the innovations were subject to criticism. For example product

    development is one of the forms that has been subject to much criticism following the recent global financial crisis.

    Structured products, in particular, bear the lions share of suspicious critique with reference to the financial

    turmoil that we continue to witness today. This has also led to the term of reference that the bearers and

    conducers of financial modernization must embrace in practice not simply financial innovation but responsible

    innovation.

    References

    1. Miller, Merton H., 1986, Financial Innovation: The last twenty years and the next. Journal of Financial andQuantitative Analysis

    2. Josh Learner, The New New Things: The origins of Financial Innovations, 20023. Merton, Robert C., 1992, Financial Innovation and Economic Performance. Journal of Applied Corporate

    Finance (Winter)

    4. Gowland, D. H. (1991). Financial Innovation in Theory and Practice (Surveys in Monetary Economics, Vol. 2, edited byC. J. Green and D. T. Llewellyn). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    5. Financial Times Lexicon(www.lexicon.ft.com/term?term=financialinnovation , Seen on 20/11/136. Zachary J. Gubler (2011), Financial Innovation Process: Theory and Application, research paper7. Goodhart, C. A. E. (1984). Monetary Theory and Practice: The UK Experience. London: Macmillan.