financial innovation in afghanistan
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Financial Innovation in Afghanistan
1/3
-
8/13/2019 Financial Innovation in Afghanistan
2/3
Source: Economics of Banking by Kent Mathews and John Thompson (2005)
Zachary J. Gubler (2011) believes that financial innovation should be understood first
and foremost as a process of change, a change in the type and variety of available
financial products to be sure, but also a change in financial intermediaries (such as
banks) and in markets, themselves.
The Modern financial innovation process based on Zachary J. Gubler
The figure below indicates that financial products migrate away from financial
intermediaries (located in the lower left- hand corner of the grid) and toward
markets (located in the upper right hand corner of the grid) when they exhibit
increasing information symmetry between intermediaries and investors (as reflected
by the arrow on the Y axis) and increasing standardization of terms (as reflected by
the arrow on the X axis). The migration of CDOs (Collateralized Debt Obligation)
away from banks is represented by its location closer to the market corner of the
grid. Note that CDOs are not located all the way at the upper right hand corner of
the grid, where the terms exchange and CCPs (Centralized Clearing Parties) arefound, because CDOs have not yet migrated to these market institutions. Finally,
note that credit default swaps, particularly those that are tied to CDOs and discussed
above, are still in a nascent, testing stage, embedded in relationships with financial
intermediaries. This diagram thus captures in broad strokes the intuitions regarding
the financial innovation process as developed in this subpart. The next subpart
discusses how the financial innovation process affects products, institutions, and
markets. In short, the process itself may lead to increased complexity in products
and institutions and create certain fragilities within the new markets created by the
market migration process.
Principle Forms of Structured Change in Ba
due to Financial Innovation
According to Goodhart (1984) there are t
principal forms of structural change du
financial innovation. They are in turn:
(1) The switch from asset management to lia
management.
(2) The development of variable rate lending
(3) The introduction of cash manage
technology.
Asset management fitted easily into the pos
world of bank balance sheets swollen with p
sector debt and quantitative controls on
lending. The basic idea behind the conce
asset management is that banks manage
assets regarding duration and type of len
subject to the constraint provided by
holdings of reserve assets. The move to lia
management (namely, their ability to c
liabilities by, for example, borrowing in the bank market) came in the USA by b
borrowing from the offshore euro dollar m
(often from their own overseas branches)
attempt to circumvent the restriction
regulation Q. The ceiling on the rate payab
deposits drove savers to invest in securities
mutual funds. In the UK, liability manage
was given a boost with the Competition
Credit Control Act 1971. With asset managem
the total quantity of bank loans was controll
restriction and deposits were supplied pas
to the banking system.
From the other side volatile inflation and int
rates during the 1970s led to the fu
development of variable rate lending. Blue
customers always had access to over
facilities at variable rates but during the 1
more and more companies switched to var
rate loans (linked to the London Inter-Bank
Rate - LIBOR). Banks were able to len
customers subject to risk, competitive pre
and marginal costs of lending. The total sto
bank loans became determined by the dem
for bank credit (this implies a near-horizsupply of bank loans curve). The developme
liability management and variable rate lendin
to the rapid expansion of bank balance sh
Banks managing their liabilities by alt
interest rates on deposits and borrowing from
inter-bank market satisfied the demand for
loans. Thus, the simplest type of fina
innovation was the development of inte
bearing demand deposits which enabled ban
manage liability.
-
8/13/2019 Financial Innovation in Afghanistan
3/3
The pace of technological innovation in banking has seen the development of new financial products that have also
resulted in a decline in unit costs to their suppliers - the banks. Credit cards, Electronic Fund Transfer (EFT),
Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), Point Of Sale (POS) machines have had the dual effect of improving consumer
cash management techniques and reducing the costs of delivery of cash management services. A good example is
the use of debit cards over cheques. The costs of clearing a cheque are 35p per item compared with 7p per debit
card transaction. (Association of Payment Clearing Services information oce, www.apacs.org.uk)
Financial Innovation in AfghanistanAfghan modern banking industry is still very infant, hence we are still not in the position where we could expect
financial innovations should generate from Afghanistan, but certainly we can rely on extension or imitation of a
financial product that already existed in advanced countries or countries with a full fledge functioning banking
industry . Looking at recent history of Afghan banking industry one can easily finds out that imitation of financial
products have been effective in Afghanistan, though bundled with several challenges. It wont be exaggeration if
we insist to say that the entire modern banking industry of Afghanistan is imitated. When a financial product is to
be imitated one acute concern would be research and analysis about the target market and contextualization of
the product based on findings. Another perilous problem would be the capacity of central bank of Afghanistan
(DAB) to effectively monitor and supervise these innovations, because some of the recent cases in banking sector
of Afghanistan indicate that the afghan regulators and policy makers are still to bring reforms in the system and
improve their own capacity.
Conclusion
Financial innovation is much overused banking terminology. Financial innovation has been used to describe any
change in the scale, scope and delivery of financial services. Many scholars have highlighted the importance of
financial innovation. Three are three interacting forces behind any financial innovations i.e. instability, regulation
and technology. The process of financial innovation is depending on the three interacting forces based or
according to Zachary J. Gubler financial innovation should be understood first and foremost as a process of
change, a change in the type and variety of available financial products to be sure, but also a change in financial
intermediaries (such as banks) and in markets, themselves. Goodhart (1984) identified three principal forms of
structural change in banking due to financial innovations which are (1) the switch from asset management to
liability management (2) the development of variable rate lending (3) the introduction of cash management
technology.
To conclude, financial innovation is indispensable to banking, however we have to be enough vigilant about theseinnovations, because recently some of the innovations were subject to criticism. For example product
development is one of the forms that has been subject to much criticism following the recent global financial crisis.
Structured products, in particular, bear the lions share of suspicious critique with reference to the financial
turmoil that we continue to witness today. This has also led to the term of reference that the bearers and
conducers of financial modernization must embrace in practice not simply financial innovation but responsible
innovation.
References
1. Miller, Merton H., 1986, Financial Innovation: The last twenty years and the next. Journal of Financial andQuantitative Analysis
2. Josh Learner, The New New Things: The origins of Financial Innovations, 20023. Merton, Robert C., 1992, Financial Innovation and Economic Performance. Journal of Applied Corporate
Finance (Winter)
4. Gowland, D. H. (1991). Financial Innovation in Theory and Practice (Surveys in Monetary Economics, Vol. 2, edited byC. J. Green and D. T. Llewellyn). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
5. Financial Times Lexicon(www.lexicon.ft.com/term?term=financialinnovation , Seen on 20/11/136. Zachary J. Gubler (2011), Financial Innovation Process: Theory and Application, research paper7. Goodhart, C. A. E. (1984). Monetary Theory and Practice: The UK Experience. London: Macmillan.