final tech memo for additional landside toe explorations project...

31
2870 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel: 916.679.2000 Fax: 916.679.2900 Technical Memorandum Technical Memorandum on Geotechnical Considerations for Clay Core and Shell 1 Prepared For Mike Inamine, PE SBFCA Christopher Krivanec, PE, GE HDR Engineering, Inc. Project Feather River West Levee Date May 6, 2013 Subject Additional Explorations for Project Phase C Prepared By Mehrzad Maghsoudlou, PG Michael Hughes, PE Reviewed By Khaled Chowdhury, PE, GE 1.0 INTRODUCTION The HDR team is providing design services to the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (SBFCA) for the Feather River West Levee (FRWL) Project. URS Corporation (URS), as a member of the HDR team, has been providing geotechnical engineering services for the FRWL Project. Based on review comments from DWR, discussions with SBFCA, and evaluation of the existing plans and stick log profiles, the need for three (3) additional explorations in the section of levee within Project Phase C was identified. The purpose of these explorations was to explore the continuity of aquiclude landward of the levee. The location of the three explorations is presented below. Boring ID Reach Station SM0016_001B 22 1499+00 SM0016_002B 23 1517+00 SM0016_003B 24 1615+00 This memorandum presents the findings of the explorations and presents an interpretation of the data.

Upload: others

Post on 06-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

2870 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel: 916.679.2000 Fax: 916.679.2900

Technical Memorandum

Technical Memorandum on Geotechnical Considerations for Clay Core and Shell

1

Prepared For Mike Inamine, PE

SBFCA Christopher Krivanec, PE, GE HDR Engineering, Inc.

Project Feather River West Levee Date May 6, 2013 Subject Additional Explorations for Project Phase C Prepared By Mehrzad Maghsoudlou, PG

Michael Hughes, PE

Reviewed By Khaled Chowdhury, PE, GE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The HDR team is providing design services to the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (SBFCA) for the Feather River West Levee (FRWL) Project. URS Corporation (URS), as a member of the HDR team, has been providing geotechnical engineering services for the FRWL Project.

Based on review comments from DWR, discussions with SBFCA, and evaluation of the existing plans and stick log profiles, the need for three (3) additional explorations in the section of levee within Project Phase C was identified. The purpose of these explorations was to explore the continuity of aquiclude landward of the levee. The location of the three explorations is presented below.

Boring ID  Reach  Station SM0016_001B  22  1499+00 SM0016_002B  23  1517+00 SM0016_003B  24  1615+00

This memorandum presents the findings of the explorations and presents an interpretation of the data.

Page 2: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

2870 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel: 916.679.2000 Fax: 916.679.2900

Technical Memorandum

Technical Memorandum on Geotechnical Considerations for Clay Core and Shell

2

2.0 FIELDWORK AND FINDINGS

Explorations were performed in February of 2013 using a truck mounted hollow stem auger/mud rotary drilling rig. Details of subsurface conditions encountered at each exploration are discussed below. Finalized boring logs, laboratory test results, and profile sheets are included in Attachment A. SM0016_001B (Reach 22, Station 1499+00) The levee at this location is approximately 10 feet to 12 feet high, with a crown elevation of approximately +91.5 feet (NAVD88) and a landside toe elevation of +80 feet. The proposed remediation measure is a soil bentonite cutoff wall keying into a fine grained aquiclude layer at an elevation of approximately +50 feet to +55 feet. The local geology in this area is mapped as Lower Modesto, which primarily comprises sand and silt with occasional layers of clay (Helley and Harwood, 1985). Boring SM0016_001B was drilled at the toe of the levee at Station 1499+00 adjacent to existing crown exploration WM0016_ 010C, which identified an approximately 7 feet thick fine grained aquiclude layer between an elevation of +52 feet and +59 feet. Boring SM0016_001B was drilled to a depth of 46.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). The boring encountered a 10 feet thick clay layer at the surface overlying approximately 12 feet of sand to an elevation of approximately +58 feet. Beneath this, an approximately 6 feet thick zone of silt and clay was encountered between elevation +52 feet and +58 feet. These silt and clay layers tie-in with where the crown CPT indicated the location of an aquiclude layer and therefore confirms the continuity of the aquiclude landward of the levee. SM0016_002B (Reach 23, Station 1517+00) The levee at this location is approximately 10 feet high, with a crown elevation of approximately +91.5 feet (NAVD88) and a landside toe elevation of +82 feet. The proposed remediation measure is a soil bentonite cutoff wall keying into a fine grained aquiclude layer at an elevation of approximately +60 feet. The local geology in this area is mapped as Lower Modesto, which primarily comprises sand and silt with occasional layers of clay (Helley and Harwood, 1985). The geomorphology map also indicates the presence of a crevasse splay in this area. Crevasse splay deposits tend to be coarser-grained and are formed from breaching of river banks or natural levees during high flood stages and deposition on the floodplain via small distributary channels. Boring SM0016_002B was drilled at the toe of the levee at Station 1517+00 adjacent to existing crown exploration WM0016_ 012C, which identified an approximately 9feet thick fine grained aquiclude layer between an elevation of +58 feet and +69 feet. Boring SM0016_002B was drilled to a depth of 51.5 bgs. The boring encountered 5 feet of clay at the surface overlying approximately 15 feet of interbedded sand and silty sand to an elevation of approximately +62 feet. Beneath this, an approximately 18 feet thick zone of silt and clay was encountered between elevation +44 feet and +62 feet. These silt and clay layers are thicker and slightly deeper than those encountered in the adjacent crown CPT. Based on the results of the additional exploration, it is possible that the aquiclude layer identified in the crown CPT is not laterally persistent landward of the proposed cutoff wall and that a silty

Page 3: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

2870 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel: 916.679.2000 Fax: 916.679.2900

Technical Memorandum

Technical Memorandum on Geotechnical Considerations for Clay Core and Shell

3

sand/sand layer is present beneath the wall between approximately elevation +53 feet and +58 feet. As such, some sensitivity analyses were run modeling a sand layer beneath the toe of the proposed cutoff wall. A cross section at Station 1522+00 was selected for analysis, because the main channel is closest to the levee at this location. At Station 1522+00, there is a waterside bench approximately 100 feet wide and there is a canal on the landside at a distance of approximately 500 feet. Based on the assumption of pancake layering, the canal penetrates through the blanket layer in this area. For the ditch present condition, the analysis results show that underseepage meets criteria for both the 200 year + 1 foot WSE and 200 year + 4 foot WSE. Assuming the ditch is not present, the exit gradient at the 200 year + 1 foot WSE meets criteria, while the gradient at the 200 year + 4 foot WSE has a gradient of 0.66. An analysis cross-section and screen shots of the seepage runs are attached in Appendix A4. Given the results of the sensitivity analysis, the fact that the aquiclude may or may not be laterally persistent on the landside and taking into account there has been no reported distress on the landside of the levee, it is considered that the proposed wall toe elevation of +60 feet is OK. SM0016_003B (Reach 24, Station 1615+00) The levee at this location is approximately 10 feet high, with a crown elevation of approximately +94 feet (NAVD88) and a landside toe elevation of +84 feet. The proposed remediation measure is a soil bentonite cutoff wall keying into a fine grained aquiclude layer at an elevation of approximately +30 feet. The local geology in this area is mapped as Lower Modesto, which primarily comprises sand and silt with occasional layers of clay (Helley and Harwood, 1985). The geomorphology map also indicates the presence of a crevasse splay in this area. Crevasse splay deposits tend to be coarser-grained and are formed from breaching of river banks or natural levees during high flood stages and deposition on the floodplain via small distributary channels. Boring SM0016_003B was drilled at the toe of the levee at Station 1615+00 adjacent to existing crown boring WM0016_ 020B, which identified a clay aquiclude layer at a depth of approximately 50 feet below the landside toe (elevation of +32 feet). Boring SM0016_003B was drilled to a depth of 72 feet bgs. The boring encountered approximately 40 feet of interbedded silt, clay, silty sand and clayey sand to an elevation of approximately +48 feet overlying approximately 15 feet of gravel to an elevation of +33 feet. Beneath this, an approximately 16 feet thick zone of silt and clay was encountered between elevation +33 feet and the bottom of the boring. Thin interbeds of silty sand and clayey sand,1.5 feet to 2.5 feet thick, were encountered within this zone. This layer provides a suitable tie-in layer for the cutoff wall and confirms the continuity of the aquiclude landward of the levee.

Page 4: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

2870 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150 Sacramento, CA 95833 Tel: 916.679.2000 Fax: 916.679.2900

Technical Memorandum

Technical Memorandum on Geotechnical Considerations for Clay Core and Shell

4

3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings of the additional explorations performed in Reach 22, Station 1499+00, and Reach 24, Station 1615+00, in Project Phase C, it is considered that the landward continuity of the aquiclude has been confirmed. Therefore, the existing analyses performed as part of the final GDRR are valid and there is no need for additional analysis or change to the proposed design.

Based on the findings of the additional exploration performed in Reach 23, Station 1517+00, and the sensitivity analyses that were performed, it is considered that the landward continuity of the aquiclude is not critical in this location. Therefore, the existing analyses performed as part of the final GDRR are valid and there is no need for additional analysis or change to the proposed design.

4.0 LIMITATIONS

This technical memorandum was prepared in accordance with the standard of care commonly used as the state-of-practice in the engineering profession. Standard of care is defined as the ordinary diligence exercised by fellow practitioners in this area performing the same services under similar circumstances during the same period. The limitations section of the final GDRR for the FRWL is applicable for this technical memorandum also.

This technical memorandum is for the use and benefit of the HDR design team and SBFCA. Use by any other party is at their own discretion and risk.

Page 5: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

APPENDIX A

A1 – Boring Logs A2 – Laboratory Results A3 – Plan and ProfilesA4 – Sensitivity Analysis

Page 6: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

APPENDIX A1 Boring Logs

Page 7: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 8: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 9: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 10: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 11: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 12: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 13: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 14: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 15: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 16: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 17: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

APPENDIX A2 Laboratory Results

Page 18: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 19: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 20: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 21: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 22: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

APPENDIX A3 Plan and Profiles

Page 23: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!

! ! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

! !!

!

!!!

! !

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

! !!

!

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!!!

!

!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!! !!

!

! !!

!

!

!! !

!

!!!

!

!!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!!!!!!

!

!

!! !

!

! !!!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

! !

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

! !

38

13

84

66

63

14

14

34

CL

SM

SM

CL

CL

CL

CL

ML

SM

SM

CL

SM

SM

CL

CL

ML

TD Elev. -48.19 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.8

ft

WM

001

6_0

01S

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. 36.94 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.2

4 ft

WM

001

6_0

08C

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. 25.92 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.0

5 ft

WM

001

6_0

09C

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. 17.37 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

0.5

4 ft

WM

001

6_0

10C

60

50

5.0

72

78

60

32

7

6

10

21

28

57

24

102

20

70

46

112

67

74

56

73

62

ML

CL-ML

SP-SMSP

SP

CL

ML

CLCL

CL

SP-SMCL

CLSP-SM

CL

CL

CL

ML

CLCL

ML

CL

SM

CL

TD Elev. 1.02 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.0

ft

N60(ASTM)

WM

001

6_0

11B

1465+00 1470+00 1480+00 1485+00 1490+00 1495+00 1500+00

STATIONING, feet

1505+00 1510+00

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.1

7 ft

WM

001

6_0

04C

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.1

5 ft

WM

001

6_0

01A

GS

Ele

v. 7

8.9

1 ft

WM

001

6_0

11C

010 Rf,% 500

TD Elev. 48.40 ft

qt

CL

CL

SC-SM

SC-SMSW-SM

SP-SM

CL

SMCLSC

CL

40

14

80

12

18

33

15

28

46

51

71

TD Elev. 46.15 ft

% Fines N60(ASTM)010 Rf,% 500

TD Elev. 30.97 ft

qt

1460+00 1475+00

qc

TD Elev. 65.82 ft

500

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.2

4 ft

Off

set:

2.4

7 ft

CF

-88

-42*

0fs101955/1957 YR WSE

200 YR WSE

LEVEE CREST

LANDSIDE LEVEE TOE

500

GS

Ele

v. 7

9.1

ft

Off

set:

-43

.78

ft

qt

SM

001

6_00

1C

TD Elev. 39.04 ft

10 0Rf,%

500

GS

Ele

v. 9

0.9

ft

Off

set:

0.0

0 ft

qt

SM

001

6_00

5C

TD Elev. 35.80 ft

10 0Rf,%

500

GS

Ele

v. 8

1.7

ft

Off

set:

-60

.5 f

t

qt

SM

001

6_00

4C

TD Elev. 50.84 ft

10 0Rf,%

REACH 22 REACH 23

REACH 22 REACH 23

% F

ines

79 ML

0 100 200 300 400 500

EL

EV

AT

ION

, fe

et

DISTANCE, feet

0

20

30

40

10

-80

-60

-40

-20

20

40

60

80

100

120

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0ELE

VA

TIO

N, F

eet

(NA

VD

88)

ELE

VA

TIO

N, F

eet

(NA

VD

88)

PROPOSED CUTOFF WALL

UNLINED LANDSIDE DITCH/CANALDISTANCE FROM LS TOE:50 TO 135 FT (STA 1460+00 TO 1472+00)30 TO 50 FT (STA 1472+00 TO 1483+00)50 TO 260 FT (STA 1483+00 TO 1510+00)

APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF

CL

SP-SM

ML

CL-ML

SM

SP

SM

CLCL

7

12

18

4

16

79

19

21

40

33

83

36

78

9

57

60

23

4

92

TD Elev. 33.50 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 8

0.0

ft

N60(ASTM)

SM

001

6_00

1B

DETAIL AREA

¯

L:\P

roje

cts\

SB

FC

A\A

rcM

aps\

SB

FC

A_P

nP_M

apbo

ok.m

xd R

K 2

8 M

ar 2

013

SA

C

0 100 200

Feet

¯

NOTES:1. Elevations of levee crown and landside toe are approximate. These elevations were obtained from DWR CVFED or ULE LiDAR data and used for geotechnical analyses and report purpose only. For detail crown elevation and landside toe information, please refer to the FRWL Project civil drawings. 2. The water surface elevations are based on information provided by Peterson Brustad, Inc. in their July 26, 2012 report entitled “Design Water Surface Profiles for the Feather River West Levee Rehabilitation Project Addendum #1".3. Locations of explorations are approximate. Stick logs represent general soil conditions encountered at the time of exploration. For more detailed information on the materials encountered, refer to boring and CPT logs in the Geotechnical Data Report for the FRWL Project. No warranty is provided regarding the continuity of soil conditions between individual explorations.4. When reported, N60(ASTM), refers to N60(ASTM) = Nfield * Hammer Efficiency (%). See Geotechnical Data Report for the FRWL Project for hammer efficiency data for individual borings. 5. These drawings do not include all historical explorations on the profile view. Historical explorations from the DWR ULE project are shown; “other” historical explorations are identified by an asterisk (*) in the exploration ID. For these “other” historical borings, blow counts are field blow counts (Nf) and USCS classifications are visual classifications. 6. USCS classification labels are not presented on the stick logs for soil lenses (thickness less than 1.5 feet).7. This is a color figure. Black and white reproduction should not be relied upon as data will be lost.8. To prevent scale distortion, this map should be printed on a “D” size sheet (22x34 inches).9. Surficial geology was mapped at 1:20,000 scale. (Source: SGDR for DWR ULE Project, URS,2010).10. The information provided in these plans and stick-log plates has been compiled from a variety of sources. URS does not attest to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of geotechnical exploration and other subsurface data by others that are included or referenced in these plates.11. These plans and stick-log plates are for the use and benefit of HDR, SBFCA, and their consultants in connection with the execution of the FRWL Project. Use by any other party is at their own discretion and risk. These figures should not to be used as the sole basis for design, construction, remedial action, or major capital spending decisions.12. The canal/ditch elevations are approximate. These elevations were estimated from the topography.

Legend

Plate Location

1460+00

1465+00

1470+00

1475+00

1480+00

1485

+00

1490

+ 00

1495

+00

1500

+00

1505

+00

1510

+00

??

?

?

??

??

!(

Ç

Ç

Ç

Ç

Ç

Ç

(

(

(

(

(

(

#

#

#

#

#

#

!

!

!

!

A

A

A

AÇ(#

Ç(#

Ç(#

CF-88-42

WM0016_011C

WM0016_001AWM0016_008CWM0016_004C

WM0016_011B

WM0016_010C

WM0016_009C

WL0009_003C

WM0016_001S

SM0016_001C

SM0016_004C

SM0016_005C !ASM0016_001B

Reach 23

BIS

HO

P A

VE

KENT AVE

0777

0

L.D.9

M.A.16

L

Ra

Qml

Rofc

Rcs

W 1937

Rch

Rch (1911)

Rob

Rb

Geotechnical DesignRecommendations Report

AppendixA32

FRWL Project Plan Views and Stick Log FiguresFRWL Project: Station 1460+00 to Station 1510+00

Sutter Butte Flood Control AgencyFEATHER RIVER WEST LEVEE PROJECT

Page 24: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!!

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !

!

!!!

! !

!

!!!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!! !

!

! !!!

! !!

!! ! !

!

! !!!! !

!

!!! !!!

!! !

!

!

! !!!

! !!!!! !

!!

!! !

!

! !!!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!!

!

! !

!

!!!

!

! !

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!! !

!!!

!

!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!

! ! !

!!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! !

!

! !!!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

! !!

!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! !!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!! !

!!!

!

!

!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!! ! !

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

! !!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

!

!!

!

! !

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. -0.48 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.2

2 ft

WM

001

6_0

12C

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. -25.32 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.8

1 ft

WM

001

6_0

02C

ML

CL

ML

ML

CL

CL

SP

SP

SP-SM

SP

CH

SC

CL

MLCL

ML

CL

CL

CL

ML

CL

CL

ML

SM

MLCL

TD Elev. -48.19 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

1.8

ft

WM

001

6_0

02S

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. 1.01 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

2.2

2 ft

WM

001

6_0

13C

29

17

25

27

66

24

27

59

57

87

73

46

92

69

49

45

45

70

78

56

ML

CL

ML

ML

SW-SM

SW-SC

SW-SC

ML

ML

SP

SM

CH

SP

CL

SM

CHSP-SM

CLCL

CL

TD Elev. -12.82 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

2.2

ft

WM

001

6_0

14B

Fr,%10 0 Qt1 500

TD Elev. 12.20 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

2.4

2 ft

WM

001

6_0

15C

1515+00 1520+00 1525+00 1530+00 1535+00 1540+00 1545+00 1550+00

STATIONING, feet

1555+00 1560+00

GS

Ele

v. 8

2.7

4 ft

WM

001

6_0

02B

77

63

4.0

7.3

32

37

% Fines

69

87

96

12

9.4

53

13

18

% Fines N60(ASTM)

CL

CL

SC-SM

SC-SM

ML

SC-SM

SM

CLCL

SW-SM

43

18

13

35

11

11

54

40

111

53

33

17

24

25

47

39

40

44

118

44

69

68

37

29

22

TD Elev. 28.74 ft

% Fines N60(ASTM)

1510+00

1955/1957 YR WSE

200 YR WSE

LEVEE CREST

LANDSIDE LEVEE TOE

500

GS

Ele

v. 8

2.6

ft

Off

set:

-45

.25

ft

qt

SM

001

6_00

3C

TD Elev. 12.74 ft

10 0Rf,%

500

GS

Ele

v. 9

2.3

ft

Off

set:

0.0

0 ft

qt

SM

001

6_00

6C

TD Elev. 17.19 ft

10 0Rf,%

% F

ines

64 ML

0 100 200 300 400 500

EL

EV

AT

ION

, fe

et

DISTANCE, feet

0

20

30

40

10

-80

-60

-40

-20

20

40

60

80

100

120

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0ELE

VA

TIO

N, F

eet

(NA

VD

88)

ELE

VA

TIO

N, F

eet

(NA

VD

88)

PROPOSED CUTOFF WALL

UNLINED LANDSIDE DITCH/CANALDISTANCE FROM LS TOE:210 TO 700 FT (STA 1510+00 TO 1560+00)

APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF

CL

SM

SP-SMSM

SP

ML

MHCL/ML

ML

ML

SP-SM

SM

ML

CLMLSM

6

12

18

19

26

35

57

11

19

22

30

30

69

36

6346

2

66

6992

44

94

TD Elev. 30.50 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 8

2.0

ft

N60(ASTM)

SM

001

6_00

2B

DETAIL AREA

¯

L:\P

roje

cts\

SB

FC

A\A

rcM

aps\

SB

FC

A_P

nP_M

apbo

ok.m

xd R

K 2

8 M

ar 2

013

SA

C

0 100 200

Feet

¯

NOTES:1. Elevations of levee crown and landside toe are approximate. These elevations were obtained from DWR CVFED or ULE LiDAR data and used for geotechnical analyses and report purpose only. For detail crown elevation and landside toe information, please refer to the FRWL Project civil drawings. 2. The water surface elevations are based on information provided by Peterson Brustad, Inc. in their July 26, 2012 report entitled “Design Water Surface Profiles for the Feather River West Levee Rehabilitation Project Addendum #1".3. Locations of explorations are approximate. Stick logs represent general soil conditions encountered at the time of exploration. For more detailed information on the materials encountered, refer to boring and CPT logs in the Geotechnical Data Report for the FRWL Project. No warranty is provided regarding the continuity of soil conditions between individual explorations.4. When reported, N60(ASTM), refers to N60(ASTM) = Nfield * Hammer Efficiency (%). See Geotechnical Data Report for the FRWL Project for hammer efficiency data for individual borings. 5. These drawings do not include all historical explorations on the profile view. Historical explorations from the DWR ULE project are shown; “other” historical explorations are identified by an asterisk (*) in the exploration ID. For these “other” historical borings, blow counts are field blow counts (Nf) and USCS classifications are visual classifications. 6. USCS classification labels are not presented on the stick logs for soil lenses (thickness less than 1.5 feet).7. This is a color figure. Black and white reproduction should not be relied upon as data will be lost.8. To prevent scale distortion, this map should be printed on a “D” size sheet (22x34 inches).9. Surficial geology was mapped at 1:20,000 scale. (Source: SGDR for DWR ULE Project, URS,2010).10. The information provided in these plans and stick-log plates has been compiled from a variety of sources. URS does not attest to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of geotechnical exploration and other subsurface data by others that are included or referenced in these plates.11. These plans and stick-log plates are for the use and benefit of HDR, SBFCA, and their consultants in connection with the execution of the FRWL Project. Use by any other party is at their own discretion and risk. These figures should not to be used as the sole basis for design, construction, remedial action, or major capital spending decisions.12. The canal/ditch elevations are approximate. These elevations were estimated from the topography.

Legend

Plate Location

B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B BB BB BB BB BB B

1510

+00

1515

+00

1520

+00

1525

+00

1530

+00

1535+00

1540+00

1545+00

1550

+00

1555

+00

1560

+00

?

?

!(

ÇÇ

Ç

Ç

(

((

(

#

#

#

#

!

!

!

!

!A

A

A

A

A

Ç(#

Ç(#CF-88-42

WM0016_002B

WM0016_015CWM0016_014B

WM0016_013C

WM0016_012CWM0016_011B

WM0016_002SWM0016_002C

SM0016_003C

SM0016_006C

!A

SM0016_002B

CO

OLE

Y R

D

AR

CH

ER

AV

E

PE

NN

ING

TO

N R

D

1991

1965

19680777

1

M.A.16

L

Qml

Rofc

Ra

Rcs

W 1937

Rch (1911)

Rob

Rch

Rb

Geotechnical DesignRecommendations Report

AppendixA33

FRWL Project Plan Views and Stick Log FiguresFRWL Project: Station 1510+00 to Station 1560+00

Sutter Butte Flood Control AgencyFEATHER RIVER WEST LEVEE PROJECT

Page 25: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! !!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

! !!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! !

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! ! !

!

!

!

! !!

!

!! !

!

!!!

!

!!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!!!!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!!!

! !

!

!!!

!

! ! !!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!! !

!!!

!

!

!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!!! !

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!!

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!! ! !

!

! !!

!

!! !!

!!

!

!

!

! !!!!!!

!! ! !

! !!!! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!!!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!! !!

!

! !!

!

!

!! !!

!!!!

!!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!!!!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! !

!

!

! !!!

! !!!!! !

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

! !!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

! !!

!

!!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! !!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !!

!

!! !

!

!

! !!!

! !!

!!! !!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!!

! !!

!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

! !

!

!!

! !!

!!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

! !!

!

!!

! !

20

7

4

25

28

22

22

28

102

52

64

ML

CL-ML

CLCL-ML

SW-SM

SW-SM

CL

MLML

SMSC-SM

SC-SM

SM

CL

TD Elev. 28.81 ft

GS

Ele

v. 9

3.8

ft

WM

001

6_0

20B

80

85

7.9

81

437.2

34

94

77

17

20

56

15

60

31

34

42

48

22

29

67

49

59

63

112

38

55

42

49

ML

CL

MLCLML

CLCL

SP-SM

SCML

SM

SW

SM

SWCH

CH

CL

CL

SC

SC

SP

SW

SP

SW

SW

SC

TD Elev. -10.42 ft

% Fines N60(ASTM)

75

42

6.6

3.7

7.5

62

55

15

CL

ML

ML

SC

SP-SM

GP

GP

SP-SC

CL

CLCL

CL

SC

CL

SC

SC

CLSP-SC

CL

CL

TD Elev. -45.63 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 9

4.4

ft

WM

001

6_0

04S

69

82

89

40

55

7.2

22

8

14

13

89

43

31

43

56

59

91

ML

ML

CL

CL

ML

MLSC-SM

SCSM

CH

ML

GP-GM

GP-GM

CH

TD Elev. 29.96 ft

% Fines N60(ASTM)

63

93

24

28

25

6.0

ML

CL

SP-SM

ML

SC-SM

SM

GW

GP-GM

MH

SW

TD Elev. 34.45 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 9

4.5

ft

WM

001

6_0

22S

1615+00 1620+00 1625+00 1630+00 1635+00 1640+00 1645+00 1650+00

STATIONING, feet

1655+00 1660+00

GS

Ele

v. 8

9.1

0 ft

WM

001

6_0

06C

66

70

59

12

83

31

16

33

% Fines N60(ASTM)

010 Rf,% 500

TD Elev. 52.03 ft

qt

1610+00

GS

Ele

v. 9

5.0

ft

WM

001

6_0

21B

GS

Ele

v. 9

4.6

ft

WM

001

6_0

01B

qc

TD Elev. 68.88 ft

500

GS

Ele

v. 9

4.3

0 ft

Off

set:

-0.

75

ft

CF

-88

-40*

0fs10

1955/1957 YR WSE

200 YR WSE

LEVEE CREST

LANDSIDE LEVEE TOE

500

GS

Ele

v. 9

0.2

ft

Off

set:

-10

0.0

0 ft

qt

SM

001

6_00

9C

TD Elev. 41.34 ft

10 0Rf,%

500

GS

Ele

v. 9

4.9

ft

Off

set:

0.0

0 ft

qt

SM

001

6_00

8C

TD Elev. 62.91 ft

10 0Rf,%

REACH 24 REACH 25

REACH 24 REACH 25

0 100 200 300 400 500

EL

EV

AT

ION

, fe

et

DISTANCE, feet

0

20

30

40

10

-80

-60

-40

-20

20

40

60

80

100

120

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0ELE

VA

TIO

N, F

eet

(NA

VD

88)

ELE

VA

TIO

N, F

eet

(NA

VD

88)

PROPOSED CUTOFF WALL

UNLINED LANDSIDE DITCH/CANALDISTANCE FROM LS TOE:0 TO 50 FT (STA 1610+00 TO 1610+50)0 FT (STA 1610+50 TO 1623+00)0 TO 70 FT (STA 1623+00 TO 1624+00)70 TO 825 FT (STA 1624+00 TO 1660+00)

APPROX. BOTTOM OFLATERAL DITCH/CANAL

APPROXIMATE BOTTOM OF

SM

SCSC

SM

SC

CL

ML

ML

MLSMMLSM

SMGP-GM

SP-SMMHCLSCSMCLSMCLCL

8

5

5

7

9

39

16

19

26

22

32

60

67

37

71

68

266

99

79

32

36

TD Elev. 12.00 ft

% Fines

GS

Ele

v. 8

4.0

ft

N60(ASTM)

SM

001

6_00

3B

DETAIL AREA

¯

L:\P

roje

cts\

SB

FC

A\A

rcM

aps\

SB

FC

A_P

nP_M

apbo

ok.m

xd R

K 2

8 M

ar 2

013

SA

C

0 100 200

Feet

¯

NOTES:1. Elevations of levee crown and landside toe are approximate. These elevations were obtained from DWR CVFED or ULE LiDAR data and used for geotechnical analyses and report purpose only. For detail crown elevation and landside toe information, please refer to the FRWL Project civil drawings. 2. The water surface elevations are based on information provided by Peterson Brustad, Inc. in their July 26, 2012 report entitled “Design Water Surface Profiles for the Feather River West Levee Rehabilitation Project Addendum #1".3. Locations of explorations are approximate. Stick logs represent general soil conditions encountered at the time of exploration. For more detailed information on the materials encountered, refer to boring and CPT logs in the Geotechnical Data Report for the FRWL Project. No warranty is provided regarding the continuity of soil conditions between individual explorations.4. When reported, N60(ASTM), refers to N60(ASTM) = Nfield * Hammer Efficiency (%). See Geotechnical Data Report for the FRWL Project for hammer efficiency data for individual borings. 5. These drawings do not include all historical explorations on the profile view. Historical explorations from the DWR ULE project are shown; “other” historical explorations are identified by an asterisk (*) in the exploration ID. For these “other” historical borings, blow counts are field blow counts (Nf) and USCS classifications are visual classifications. 6. USCS classification labels are not presented on the stick logs for soil lenses (thickness less than 1.5 feet).7. This is a color figure. Black and white reproduction should not be relied upon as data will be lost.8. To prevent scale distortion, this map should be printed on a “D” size sheet (22x34 inches).9. Surficial geology was mapped at 1:20,000 scale. (Source: SGDR for DWR ULE Project, URS,2010).10. The information provided in these plans and stick-log plates has been compiled from a variety of sources. URS does not attest to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of geotechnical exploration and other subsurface data by others that are included or referenced in these plates.11. These plans and stick-log plates are for the use and benefit of HDR, SBFCA, and their consultants in connection with the execution of the FRWL Project. Use by any other party is at their own discretion and risk. These figures should not to be used as the sole basis for design, construction, remedial action, or major capital spending decisions.12. The canal/ditch elevations are approximate. These elevations were estimated from the topography.

Legend

Plate Location

1605+00

1610+00

1615+00

1620+00

162 5

+ 00

1 630

+00

1635

+00

1640

+00

1645

+00

1650

+00

1655

+00

1660

+00

?

?

?

?

!(

Ç(#

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

Ç(#

Ç(#

Ç(#

CF-88-40WM0016_006C

WM0016_001B

WM0016_022S

WM0016_021B

WM0016_020B

WM0016_019S

WM0016_004S

SM0016_009C

SM0016_008C

SM0016_011C

!ASM0016_003B

Reach 25

Reach 24

CAMPBELL RD

07773

M.A.16

L

Ra

Qml

Rch

Rcs

Rob

W 1937

Geotechnical DesignRecommendations Report

AppendixA35

FRWL Project Plan Views and Stick Log FiguresFRWL Project: Station 1610+00 to Station 1660+00

Sutter Butte Flood Control AgencyFEATHER RIVER WEST LEVEE PROJECT

Page 26: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee

APPENDIX A3 Plan and Profiles

APPENDIX A4

Sensitivity Analysis

Page 27: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 28: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 29: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 30: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee
Page 31: Final Tech Memo for Additional Landside Toe Explorations Project …sutterbutteflood.org/admin/upload/URS_2013b-Additional... · 2019. 3. 26. · Project Feather River West Levee