final msl fraternity and sorority presentation
TRANSCRIPT
1
Fraternity and Sorority Analysis University of Illinois Urbana-
Champaign 12/04/15Ismael Correa & Mia Xin
MSL/ NCLP, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2015
2
Outline
Section I Background and Purpose
Section II Demographic findings
Section IIILeadership Training Experiences
Section IVGroup difference on the Social Change
Model Leadership Outcomes
3
Section IBackground and Purpose
4
MSL Overview
MSL is an international research study which studies the impact of higher education on shaping socially
responsible leadership capacity and other leadership related outcomes in college students.
MSL can be gauged on 2 levels:1.Theoretical level: The Social Change Model and 7Cs 2.Conceptual level: Astin’s (1993) inputs-Environment-Outputs (I-E-O) Model.
Sample FS Participants: 300 University of Illinois undergraduate
studentswho completed the MSL survey in its entirety and who indicated membership in either a multicultural or social fraternity or sorority.
5
Theoretical Framework: Social Change Model (7 C’s)
Individual Values
Consciousness of Self- awareness of the beliefs, values, attitudes, and emotions that motivate one to take action
Congruence- thinking, feeling, and behaving with consistency, genuineness, authenticity, and a honesty toward others; actions are consistent with the most deeply held beliefs and convictions
Commitment- The psychic energy that motivates the individual to serve that drives the collective effort; implies passion, intensity, and duration, and is directed toward both the group activity as well as its intended outcomes.
6
Group Values
Collaboration- To work with others in a common effort, constitutes the cornerstone values of the group leadership effort because it empowers self and others through trust.
Controversy with Civility- Recognizes two fundamental realities of any creative group effort: that differences in viewpoint are inevitable, and that such differences must be aired openly, but with civility.
Theoretical Framework: Social Change Model (7 C’s)
7
Community Values
Citizenship – The process by whereby an individual and the collaborative group become responsibly connected to the community and society through the leadership development activity.
Theoretical Framework: Social Change Model (7 C’s)
8
Section IIDemographic Findings
9
Demographic Findings Class Standing
10
Demographic Findings Grade Point Average
11
Demographic Findings Race
12
Demographic Findings Gender
13
Section IIILeadership Training Experiences
of Fraternity and Sorority Members
14
Fraternity and Sorority Members Participation in Leadership
Training Experiences
15
About 50% (152/300) of students participated in at least one leadership training experience
Out of that 50%: • 16% participated in 1 Leadership Training
Experiences • 29% participated in 2 Leadership Training
Experiences • 29% participated in 3 Leadership Training
Experiences • 22% participated In 4 Leadership Training
Experiences • 4% participated in 5 Leadership Training
Experiences
Fraternity and Sorority Members Participation in Leadership
Training Experiences
16
Male Leadership Training Experiences
17
Female Leadership Training Experiences
18
1. Most of men participated in a Leadership Lecture/Workshop (42.5%)
2. Most of women participated in a Leadership lecture/workshop. (44.2%)
3. Women participate in the leadership certificate program at a much higher rate than men. (23.6% compared to 9%)
Key Observations
19
Section IVGroup Differences on the Social Change Model (SCM) Leadership
Outcomes
20
Group Differences on the Social Change Model (SCM) Leadership
Outcomes Hypothesis
Students who were involved in Fraternities and Sororities scored the same on each of the 7 leadership outcomes than students who were not involved in Fraternities and Sororities.
Alternative Hypothesis Students who were involved in Fraternities and Sororities scored differently on each of the 7 Leadership Outcomes than those students who were not involved in Fraternities and Sororities.
21
Group Differences on the Social Change Model (SCM) Leadership
Outcomes
22
Group Differences on the Social Change Model (SCM) Leadership
Outcomes Key Question: Is the effect size big enough to mean
something?
Effect Size• An effect size quantifies the difference between two groups.
o An effect size of .15 is trivial o An effect size of .20 is small o An effect size of .50 is medium o An effect size of .80 is large
In higher education a small effect size is very notable
Ellis, P.D. (2009), “Thresholds for interpreting effect sizes”, http://www.polyu.edu.hk/mm/effectsizefaqs/thresholds_for_interpreting_effect_sizes2.html accessed on November 16th, 2015
23
Effect Size
Consciousness of Self .27 Small to Moderate Effect Size
Citizenship .18 Small
OMNIBUS .15 Trivial/Small
24
Conclusion
• Demographic Distributions • 80% of the participants had a GPA of 3.00/4.00
and up • About 68% of participants were Juniors and
Seniors • Leadership Training Experiences
• Most of Men participated in a Leadership Lecture/Workshop (42.5%)
• Most of women participated in a Leadership Lecture/Workshop (44.2%)
• Group Difference Analysis between individuals who belong to a Fraternity or Sorority and individuals who do not belong to a Fraternity or Sorority • Those who belong to a Fraternity or Sorority on
campus at U of I indicate significantly higher leadership skills on consciousness of self, citizenship and their overall leadership capacity
Discussion
25
What does this data tell us about . . . Our school’s students who are involved in a Fraternity or Sorority?Our school’s Fraternity and Sorority system?Our school’s culture?Our school’s leadership programs?Our school’s strengths and weaknesses?Our school’s future strategies?
26
Q & A