final determination in the matter of francis …

1

FINAL DETERMINATION

IN THE MATTER OF FRANCIS CAMAROTA, Requester v. WEST CHESTER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent

: : : : : : : : : :

Docket No: AP 2019-1024

INTRODUCTION

Francis Camarota, Esq. (“Requester”) submitted a request (“Request”) to the West Chester

Area School District (“District”) pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law (“RTKL”), 65 P.S. §§ 67.101

et seq., seeking records related to a construction project in the District. The District partially

denied the pertinent parts of the Request, citing the attorney-client privilege, and the Requester

appealed to the Office of Open Records (“OOR”). For the reasons set forth in this Final

Determination, the appeal is granted in part, denied in part, and dismissed as moot in part, and

the District is required to take additional action as directed.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On April 30, 2019, the Request was filed, seeking, in pertinent part:

1. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Mark Allen Groves … relating to the [Renovations and Additions to East Goshen Elementary School (“Project”)] from September 1, 2017 to the present.

2

2. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Kevin Campbell … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

3. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Timothy Burns … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

4. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by James Scanlon … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

5. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Dennis Brown … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

6. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Tammi Florio … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

7. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Laura Swisher … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

8. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Frank Mack…relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

9. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Michael Wagman … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

10. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Donald Young … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

11. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by William Feaster … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

12. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Chris McCune … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

13. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Sue Tiernan … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

3

14. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Gary Bevilaqua … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

15. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Joyce Chester … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

16. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Brian Gallen … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

17. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Karen Herrman … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

18. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Kate Shaw … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

19. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by Randell Spackman … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

20. All emails and attachments thereto and other correspondence sent to or received by M. Christopher Tabakin … relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

21. All emails and correspondence between any representative of the [District] and Kevin Blackney of Blackney Hayes Architects relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

22. All emails and correspondence between any representative of the [District] and Kate Mooney of Blackney Hayes Architects relating to the Project from September 1, 2017 to the present.

On June 20, 2019, following an agreed upon extension to respond to Items 1-22, 65 P.S. §

67.902(b), the District partially denied the Request, claiming attorney-client privilege.

On July 1, 2019, the Requester appealed to the OOR, challenging the denial and stating

grounds for disclosure. Specifically, the Requester noted that there were discrepancies between

the privilege log the District provided and the documents provided. The OOR invited both parties

4

to supplement the record and directed the District to notify any third parties of their ability to

participate in this appeal. 65 P.S. § 67.1101(c).

On July 11, 2019, the District submitted a position statement reiterating its grounds for

denial. The District claimed that all responsive records have been provided to the Requester and

the discrepancies noted by the Requester are a misunderstanding due to the process by which they

collected documents. The District also claimed that records were properly withheld under the

attorney-client privilege. The District explained that upon receipt of the Request, all potentially

responsive records were uploaded to a platform for counsel to review. Counsel reviewed the

documents and removed a large number that were nonresponsive. Each document was assigned a

number containing the prefix “Steubner.” The “Steubner” numbers did not update following the

removal. A privilege log was created utilizing these nonconsecutive numbers. The documents

and privilege log originally provided to the Requester on June 20, 2019 (“Original Log”) contained

the “Steubner” numbers.

However, following assembly of the documents, they were Bates stamped with a number

utilizing the prefix “ERSteubner.” The Original Log identified privileged documents by the

“Steubner” number although the documents also had a Bates stamp “ERSteubner” number on it.

The “ERSteubner” numbers had no correlation to the Original Log

On appeal, the District created a new privilege log titled “Appeal Log” that contained the

“Steubner” number as well as a new column identifying the Bates stamped number (now with the

prefix “Privileged” followed by an eight-digit number). In support of its position, the District

submitted the affidavits of Mark Groves, the Capital Programs Manager of the District and

Attorney Daniel LePera, an attorney at Unruh, Turner Burke & Freese, the appointed solicitor for

the District.

5

The OOR ordered in camera review and the District provided another log. The in camera

privilege log (“in camera log”) shows a Bates stamp number for each page of each record (1-

2899). It also has a column for “privileged record number,” which corresponds to the

“Privileged”/Bates stamp in the Appeal Log. For clarity’s sake, the OOR will utilize the in camera

log numbers as much as possible and will identify the relevant log if any other numbers are utilized.

On March 4, 2021, the Requester emailed the OOR attempting to withdraw his indefinite

extension such that a final determination would be due by March 25, 2021. The OOR does not

permit a party to withdraw an indefinite extension; however, because the OOR was able to meet

this deadline, the OOR saw no reason to respond to the demand.

LEGAL ANALYSIS

“The objective of the Right to Know Law ... is to empower citizens by affording them

access to information concerning the activities of their government.” SWB Yankees L.L.C. v.

Wintermantel, 45 A.3d 1029, 1041 (Pa. 2012). Further, this important open-government law is

“designed to promote access to official government information in order to prohibit secrets,

scrutinize the actions of public officials and make public officials accountable for their

actions.” Bowling v. Office of Open Records, 990 A.2d 813, 824 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010), aff’d 75

A.3d 453 (Pa. 2013).

The OOR is authorized to hear appeals for all Commonwealth and local agencies. See 65

P.S. § 67.503(a). An appeals officer is required “to review all information filed relating to the

request” and may consider testimony, evidence and documents that are reasonably probative and

relevant to the matter at issue. 65 P.S. § 67.1102(a)(2). An appeals officer may conduct a hearing

to resolve an appeal. The decision to hold a hearing is discretionary and non-appealable. Id. Here,

in camera review was requested and granted.

6

The District is a local agency subject to the RTKL that is required to disclose public

records. 65 P.S. § 67.302. Records in possession of a local agency are presumed public unless

exempt under the RTKL or other law or protected by a privilege, judicial order or decree. See 65

P.S. § 67.305. Upon receipt of a request, an agency is required to assess whether a record requested

is within its possession, custody or control and respond within five business days. 65 P.S. § 67.901.

An agency bears the burden of proving the applicability of any cited exemptions. See 65 P.S. §

67.708(b).

Section 708 of the RTKL places the burden of proof on the public body to demonstrate that

a record is exempt. In pertinent part, Section 708(a) states: “(1) The burden of proving that a

record of a Commonwealth agency or local agency is exempt from public access shall be on the

Commonwealth agency or local agency receiving a request by a preponderance of the

evidence.” 65 P.S. § 67.708(a)(1). The burden of proof in claiming a privilege is on the party

asserting that privilege. Levy v. Senate of Pa., 34 A.3d 243, 249 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011).]

Preponderance of the evidence has been defined as “such proof as leads the fact-finder … to find

that the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence.” Pa. State Troopers

Ass’n v. Scolforo, 18 A.3d 435, 439 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011) (quoting Pa. Dep’t of Transp. v. Agric.

Lands Condemnation Approval Bd., 5 A.3d 821, 827 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010)).

1. The District provided additional responsive records during the appeal

During the appeal, the District provided additional records that are responsive to the

Request. As such, the appeal as to the records identified in the in camera log Bates Nos. 806, 807-

810, 811-826, and 827-834, and in the Appeal Log as Privileged-00000150, Privileged-00000151,

Privileged-00000152, Privileged-00000153, Privileged-00000601, and Privileged-00000605, is

dismissed as moot.

7

2. All responsive records have been identified and/or provided

The Requester asserts that not all responsive records were provided and there are

significant discrepancies regarding the Bates numbers on the records. However, as explained in

the Factual Background, the District utilized multiple number systems. With the in camera log

and in camera review, this issue is now moot.

3. The District has demonstrated that some records are protected by the attorney-client privilege

The RTKL defines “privilege” as “[t]he attorney-client privilege, the doctor-patient

privilege, the speech and debate privilege or other privilege recognized by a court interpreting the

laws of this Commonwealth.” 65 P.S. § 67.102. In order for the attorney-client privilege to apply,

an agency must demonstrate that: 1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a

client; 2) the person to whom the communication was made is a member of the bar of a court, or

his subordinate; 3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed by his

client, without the presence of strangers, for the purpose of securing either an opinion of law, legal

services or assistance in a legal matter, and not for the purpose of committing a crime or tort; and

4) the privilege has been claimed and is not waived by the client. See Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v.

Fleming, 924 A.2d 1259, 1263-64 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007). “[A]fter an agency establishes the

privilege was properly invoked under the first three prongs, the party challenging invocation of

the privilege must prove waiver under the fourth prong.” Office of the Governor v. Davis, 122

A.3d 1185, 1192 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014) (citing Id.). An agency may not rely on a bald assertion

that the attorney-client privilege applies; instead, the agency must prove all four elements. See

Clement v. Berks County, OOR Dkt. AP 2011-0110, 2011 PA O.O.R.D. LEXIS 139 (“Simply

invoking the phrase ‘attorney-client privilege’ or ‘legal advice’ does not excuse the agency from

the burden it must meet to withhold records”). The attorney-client privilege protects only those

8

disclosures necessary to obtain informed legal advice, where the disclosure might not have

occurred absent the privilege, and where the client’s goal is to obtain legal advice. Joe v. Prison

Health Services, Inc., 782 A.2d 24 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001). The privilege applies where the

client’s ultimate goal is legal advice and does not extend to busines advice or protect clients from

factual investigation. See Davis, 122 A.3d at 1192 (citations omitted).

Attorney LePera affirms that his firm, Unruh Turner Burke & Frees, is the appointed

solicitor for the District. The OOR conducted in camera review of the records withheld as

privileged. Many records are not protected by the attorney-client privilege as they are not to or

from an attorney for the purpose of securing legal advice. On their face, the contents of many

records consist of routine scheduling and transmittal correspondence or are comprised of factual

information that is not protected by privilege. Pa. Dep’t of Educ. v. Bagwell, 114 A.3d 1113, 1124

(Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015) (citing Commonwealth v. Vartan, 733 A.2d 1258 (Pa. 1999)); see also

Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981) (privilege extends only to communications and

not to fact).

Furthermore, many records are not protected by the attorney-client privilege because, even

though an attorney is a sender or recipient, the information is purely factual in nature and not

related to securing legal advice, i.e. forwarding emails from opposing counsel for “information

purposes.” Several of the redacted pages contain no substantive information, but rather are blank

or nearly blank pages with email closings; there is at least one out of office email that is not

protected by the privilege. Similarly, emails from opposing counsel are not protected by attorney-

client privilege. Emails that forward attachments are protected in some cases, if the email contains

or seeks legal advice, but the attachments themselves may not be protected. For example,

complaints filed with the court, letters from third parties, judicial orders, emergency injunctions,

9

and filed briefs. Blank bid forms, bid abstracts and other documentation of fact collected by the

District are not protected by the attorney-client privilege, merely because they have been

forwarded to an attorney. Based upon in camera review, the District has demonstrated that only

the records identified in the attached Addendum are protected by the attorney-client privilege.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is granted in part, denied in part, and dismissed

as moot in part, and the District is required to provide all responsive records not identified in the

attached Addendum within thirty days. This Final Determination is binding on all parties. Within

thirty days of the mailing date of this Final Determination, any party may appeal to the Chester

County Court of Common Pleas. 65 P.S. § 67.1302(a). All parties must be served with notice of

the appeal. The OOR also shall be served notice and have an opportunity to respond as per Section

1303 of the RTKL. 65 P.S. § 67.1303. However, as the quasi-judicial tribunal adjudicating this

matter, the OOR is not a proper party to any appeal and should not be named as a party.1 This

Final Determination shall be placed on the OOR website at: http://openrecords.pa.gov.

FINAL DETERMINATION ISSUED AND MAILED: March 19, 2021 /s/ Erin Burlew _________________________ APPEALS OFFICER ERIN BURLEW, ESQ. Sent to: Francis Camarota, Esq. (via email only); Matt Meyer, Esq. (via email); Daniel LePera (via email only); Nancy Glidden, Esq. (via email only)

1 Padgett v. Pa. State Police, 73 A.3d 644, 648 n.5 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).

http://openrecords.pa.gov/

Bates From To Date Time OOR description

1 William BurkeKevin Campbell, Ross Unruh 10/13/2017 2:07 email thread discussion Lease draft



4, 7, 9, 11 Mark Groves Ross Unruh 11 5/3/2017 2:56 email updating attorney on East Goshen bids7, 9, 11 Ross Unruh Mark Groves 3/5/2018 3:20 attorney response9, 11 Mark Groves Ross Unruh 3/5/2018 3:34 District explanation to attorney11 Ross Unruh Mark Groves 3/5/2018 4:08 attorney response

13 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist 3/6/2018 5:37 attorney seeking District position

15, 18, 21, 24, 40 Amanda SundquistKevin Campbell, Mark Goves, Ross Unruh 3/8/2018 10:32 attorney seeking District position

18, 21, 24, 36, 39-40 Kevin Campbell

Amanda Sundquist, Mark Groves 3/8/2018 11:10 District position

21, 36, 39 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist 3/8/2018 11:20 attorney updating District on work and next steps

27, 30, 33 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 3/8/2018 12:59

attorney updating District on bid dispute and opposing counsel

27, 30, 33 Amanda Sundquist Ross Unruh, Nancy Glidden 3/8/2018 12:31attorney forwarding information to co-counsel with explanation

30, 33 Kevin Campbell Mark Groves, Ross Unruh 3/9/2018 9:03 District assessing case

33 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 3/9/2018 9:59 attorney responding to District’s assessment

44-45memorandum (seeks factual information to analyze the issues and prepare for a challenge)

47-51 memorandum with answers by District

PRIVILEGED RECORDS ADDENDUM

194 Ross Unruh

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden, Donald Turner 3/13/2018 11:37 question for District re: bid dispute position

342 Mark Groves

Kevin Campbell, Ross Unruh, Amanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden, Donald Turner 3/13/2018 12:53

provide factual information necessary for legal services/defense of case

350, 352, 354 Amanda Sundquist

Mark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Ross Unruh, Nancy Glidden 3/13/2018 1:50 questions regarding documents provided

352 Mark Groves

Amanda Sundquist, Kevin Campbell, Ross Unruh, Nancy Glidden 3/13/2018 2:02

*in log, this says 2:29discussion regarding documents provided

354 Mark Groves

Kevin Campbell, Amanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 3/13/2018 2:13 providing additional documentation

366, 369, 372, 375, 379, 391, 394, 398 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist, Ross Unruh 3/14/2018 12:05 seeking information from the District

369 Mark Groves

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campell, Amanda Sundquist, Ross Unruh 3/14/2018 12:06 District response to 12:05 email

372, 375 Mark Groves

Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh, Amanda Sundquist 3/14/2018 12:13 District response to 12:05 email

383-390 draft bid addendum for attorney review

394 Kevin Campbell

Nancy Glidden, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist, Ross Unruh 3/14/2018 12:36 District explananion of addendum

398 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist 3/14/2018 1:13 Attorney review and addendum changes

447-454, 460-467East Goshen Addendum 6 attachment – draft addendum being sent to attorney for review

478 Mark GrovesAmanda Sundquist, Mark Groves 3/15/2018 2:29 Asking attorney about addenum

482, 484 Amanda Sundquist

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 3/15/2018 2:32

Asking District for explaantion of bid dispute/specificcations

483, 484 Mark Groves

Amanda Sundquist, Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 3/15/2018 2:34 Answering questions in 2:32 email

496, 497-498 Amanda SundquistKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 3/16/2018 10:24

Asking District for information necessary to answer to complaint

497-498 Mark GrovesAmanda Sundquist, Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden 3/16/2018 12:22 Answering attorney's questions for answer to complaint

513, 544, 545 Amanda Sundquist

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 3/16/2018 3:29

*3:03 in logproviding discovery request and advising re: response

514 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campell, Mark Groves, Ross Unruh, Amanda Sundquist 3/16/2018 5:31 email re: draft answer and explanations for District

515-531 draft of answer to complaint for District review

550 Amanda Sundquist

Mark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 3/19/2018 10:10 follow up questions

560 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Amanda Sundquist 3/19/2018 4:04

email transmitting and draft answer to emergency motion for special injunction with expedited discovery

561-577 draft answer for District review

599, 605, 607 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 3/20/2018 10:58 asking for client authorization

601, 603 Ross Unruh

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden, Amanda Sundquist 3/20/2018 11:34 discussion re: motion for preliminary injunction & hearing

601, 603 Nancy Glidden Amanda Sundquist 3/20/2018 11:24 discussion re: motion for preliminary injunction & hearing

601-602, 603-604 Amanda Sundquist Nancy Glidden 3/20/2018 11:17 discussion re: motion for preliminary injunction & hearing

602, 604 Nancy Glidden Amanda Sundquist 3/20/2018 11:07 discussion re: motion for preliminary injunction & hearing

602, 604 Amanda Sundquist Nancy Glidden 3/20/2018 10:45 discussion re: motion for preliminary injunction & hearing

605, 607 Mark GrovesRoss Unruh, Kevin Campbell 3/20/2018 11:51 response to 10:58 email

609, 610, 611 Mark GrovesAmanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 3/21/2018 2:33 discussion re: subpoenas

610, 611 Amanda SundquistMark Groves, Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 3/21/2018 3:37 discussion re: subpoenas

612, 615, 617, 620, 622 Ross Unruh

Mark Groves Amanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden 3/22/2018 10:18 discussion re: judicial order

612, 615, 617, 620, 622-623 Amanda Sundquist Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 3/22/2018 9:55 discussion re: judicial order

615, 617, 620 622 Mark GrovesRoss Unruh, Amanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden 3/22/2018 10:33 discussion re: judicial order

617 Ross Unruh Mark Groves 3/22/2018 10:54 discussion re: judicial order

620 Ross UnruhMark Groves, Amanda Sundquist Nancy Glidden 3/22/2018 11:26 advising District on judial order intepretation

622 Mark GrovesRoss Unruh, Amanda Sundquist, Nancy Glidden 3/22/2018 11:32 District response

631, 705, 706, 708 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 3/22/2018 8:00 email transmitting and re: draft answer

632-637 draft answer to emergency motion

705, 706, 708 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Kevin Campell 3/22/2018 8:11 District review of of draft answer

706, 708 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 3/22/2018 8:12 response to District review708 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 3/22/2018 8:16 discussion re: review

710 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 3/23/2018 8:13email transmitting draft answer and identifying areas for District to review

711- 720 draft answer

735, 775 Amanda SundquistKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 3/26/2018 5:15 Issues related to latest filing

776 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 3/28/2018 10:15 discussion of Judge's decision and additional filings

777 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/2/2018 9:57 discussion re: judicial order

777 Amanda Sundquist Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 4/2/2018 9:50 discussion re: judicial order

777 Amanda Sundquist Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 4/2/2018 9:49 discussion re: judicial order778, 781, 782, 783-784, 786, 787, 788, 792, 794, 798 Amanda Sundquist

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden, Ross Unruh 4/2/2018 10:03 discussion re: judicial order

782, 783, 785, 791, 794, 796, 797 Kevin Campbell

Ross Unruh, Amanda Sundquist, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 4/2/2018 10:22 discussion re: judicial order

783, 785, 791, 793-794 Ross Unruh

Kevin Campbell, Amanda Sundquist, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 4/2/2018 10:46 discussion re: judicial order

785, 791, 793, 797, 797 Kevin Campbell

Ross Unruh, Amanda Sundquist, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 4/2/2018 10:53 discussion re: judicial order

793, 796 Ross Unruh Mark Groves 4/2/2018 2:29 recommendation following judicial order793, 796 Mark Groves Ross Unruh 4/2/2018 12:32 discussion re: effect of/compliance with judicial order796 Ross Unruh Mark Groves 4/2/2018 2:48 discussion re: effect of/compliance with judicial order796 Mark Groves Ross Unruh 4/2/2018 2:41 discussion re: effect of/compliance with judicial order

800, 801, 802 Amanda SundquistKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/2/2018 11:24 Bid opening and advertment for bid opening/meeting

801, 802 Mark GrovesAmanda Sundquist, Kevin Campbell 4/2/2018 11:27 Bid opening and advertment for bid opening/meeting

802 Kevin CampbellMark Groves, Amanda Sundquist 4/2/2018 1:12 District plan: re bid opening

803, 804, 805 Amanda SundquistKevin Campell, Mark Groves 4/11/2018 9:21 bid opening discussion

804, 805 Kevin CampbellAmanda Sundquist, Mark Groves 4/11/2018 9:28 bid opening discussion

844 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Donald Turner 8/29/2018 12:30 seeking contractor documents for dispute reivew

845 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Donald Turner 1/16/2019 10:03 contractor dispute/communications discussion

848 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Donald Turner 1/18/2019 11:54

discussion re: opposing counsel communication, seeking documents

875, 982, 983, 985, 990, 994 Kevin Campbell Ross Unruh, Donald Turner 2/22/2019 11:43 answers a question following a meeting with counsel970, 972, 973, 981, 986, 987, 991-992, 1005, 1010, 1012-1013 Kevin Campbell Donald Turner Ross Unruh 1/22/2019 12:57

email from District providing latest signed schedule from contractor, explaining District’s position on when payment is due

972 Donald TurnerKevin Campbell, Ross Unruh 1/22/2019 1:28 question from counsel

973 Donald TurnerKevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 1/22/2019 2:20 question from counsel

974, 976 Donald Turner

Kevin Campbell, Ross Unruh, Daniel LePera, Terro DiProspero 1/23/2019 12:15

email from counsel updating District on conversations with opposing counsel

979 Donald Turner Kevin Campell 1/24/2019 10:16 email from attorney regarding bond claim981, 986, 987, 991, 1005, 1010, 1012 Ross Unruh

Kevin Campbell, Donald Turner 1/24/2019 10:59

email from attorney asking District for explanation re: signed schedules

982, 983, 985, 989, 993-994 Ross Unruh

Kevin Campbell, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 11:00 email from attorney asking for clarification from District

983, 989, 993 Kevin CampbellRoss Unruh, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2018 11:16 email from District seeking advice on next step

985 Kevin CampbellRoss Unruh, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 11:18 answers question in email 1/24/19 11:00

987, 991, 1004, 1009, 1012 Ross Unruh

Kevin Campbell, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 11:30 attorney explaining what needs to be done

987, 1004, 1009, 1012 Kevin Campbell

Ross Unruh, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 11:24 answers question in 1/24/19 10:50 email

989, 993 Ross UnruhKevin Campell, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 11:46 attorney advice

993 Kevin CampbellRoss Unruh, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 11:55 agreeing with attorney advice and advising will follow

995, 1007 Kevin CampbellRoss Unruh, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 12:02 notifying attorneys of potential litigation

1007 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 12:17 email from attorney regarding potential litigation

1011 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Donald Turner, Daniel LePera 1/24/2019 12:33 email from attorney explaining plans

1017, 1027 Kevin CampbellDonald Turner, Ross Unruh, Nancy Glidden 1/25/2019 3:27 email from District regarding case review options

1021 Ross UnruhKevin Campbell, Donald Turner, Nancy Glidden 1/25/2019 3:52 attorney response re: case review options

1028 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Donald Turner, Ross Unruh, Timothy Burns, Mark Groves 1/28/2019 11:48 email from attorney seeking additional information

1034, 1042 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera, Ross Unruh, Donald Turner 1/28/2019 2:07 summary of conversation with bonding company

1038, 1040 Kevin CampbellMark Groves, Nancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 1/28/2019 2:18

explanation of documentation transmitted to bonding company

1042 Ross Unruh

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera, Donald Turner 1/28/2019 3:03 explanation of remedies available

1044 Kevin Campbell

Nancy Glidden, Daniel LePera, Mark Groves, Timothy Burns 1/28/2019 6:44 information regarding email being forwarded

1051 Kevin Campbell

Nancy Glidden, Daniel LePera, Mark Groves, Timothy Burns, Wayn2 Birster 1/28/2019 6:45 information regarding email being forwarded

1052 Kevin Campbell

Nancy Glidden, Daniel LePera, Mark Groves, Timothy Burns 1/28/2019 6:45 information regarding email thread being forwarded

1054, 1062, 1070, 1074, 1078, 1081 Mark Groves

Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden 1/29/2019 3:24

forwarding documents and asking for review/assessment prior to payment

1078, 1081 Nancy GliddenMark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 1/29/2019 4:31

attorney providing advice regarding assessment prior to payment

1089, 1095, 1100, 1104 Mark Groves

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 1/29/2019 5:05 conversation around bond specifications

1100, 1104 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 1/29/2019 5:22 attorney question regarding timing1104 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 1/29/2019 5:23 District answer1109, 1110-1111, 1112-1113, 1115 Daniel LePera

Mark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden 2/1/2019 9:56 attorney questions

1110, 1112, 1114-1115 Mark Groves

Daniel LePera, Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden 2/1/2019 10:24 answers

1112, 1114 Nancy GliddenMark Groves, Daniel LePera, Kevin Campbell 2/1/2019 10:29 attorney response and potential next step

1114 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Danie LePera, Kevin Campbell 2/1/2019 10:32 District response

1116, 1152, 1154, 1156 Nancy Glidden

Mark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/1/2019 10:45 explaining contractor dispute/bond company involvement

1117 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 2/1/2019 11:04 relaying conversation with bond compnay

1152, 1154, 1156 Daniel LePeraKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 2/1/2019 2:08

questions regardign outstanding invoices and effect on contract

1158, 1159, 1160, 1163 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 2/4/2019 11:48 discussion of possible termination and counsel's letter

1162 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/4/2019 12:22

providing attorney with additional information regarding possible termination

1180, 1183 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 2/4/2019 7:02 email seeking District review and ok on draft letter

1181-1182 draft letter

1183 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Mark Groves 2/5/2019 8:44 District response to draft letter

1184 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 2/8/2019 11:14

forwarding letter from opposing counsel and asking District for explanations regarding certain aspects of the letter

1088 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Danile LePera, Kevin Campbell 2/8/2019 4:02 email noting District changes to document

1089 document with District changes1190, 1191, 1194, 1196-1197, 1199-1200, 1202-1203, 1211-1212, 1215-1216 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 2/11/2019 9:38

email regarding response to opposing counsel and seeking District input

1191, 1193, 1196, 1198-1199, 1202, 1211, 1214 Kevin Campbell

Nancy Glidden, Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 2/11/2019 11:10 District response

1193, 1195-1196, 1198, 1202, 1210-1211, 1214 Mark Groves

Kevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 11:19 District response

1195, 1201-1202 Nancy GliddenMark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 3:17

updated District on conversation with opposign counsel and asked District question about the case

1198, 1210, 1213-1214 Nancy Glidden

Mark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 3:23 asking District for update on payments

1201 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 3:25 District's response

1204, 1217, 1219, 1222, 1225, 1229, 1231-1232, 1235 Mark Groves

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 3:27 District's response updated

1210, 1213 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 3:30 issues with application from contactor

1213 Nancy GliddenMark Groves, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 2/12/2019 3:31 attorney's response and plan

1217, 1219, 1222, 1225, 1228-1229, 1231, 1234-1235, Nancy Glidden

Mark Groves, Daniel LePera, Kevin Campbell 2/12/2019 3:32 asking District for update on payments

1219, 1222, 1225, 1228, 1231, 1234 2/12/2019 3:35 District response1222, 1225, 1228, 1231, 1234, Kevin Campbell 2/12/2019 3:41 District response1228 Nancy Glidden 2/12/2019 3:44 attorney response1231, 1234 Mark Groves 2/12/2019 4:08 District providing additional information

1234 Nancy Glidden 2/12/2019 4:09attorney informing District as to work on possible breaches

1272, 1274, 1281 Nancy Glidden 2/14/2019 12:20 issuance of check and possibility of meeting

1277 Mark Groves 2/14/2019 1:36forwarding letter and providing attorney with additional information

1281 Kevin Campbell 2/14/2019 2:36 response regarding possibility of meeting1283-1285 Mark Groves 2/15/2019 1:12 issues with draft of schedule1300, 1301, 1302-1303, 1305, 1306-1307, 1308-1309, 1310-1311, 1312-1313, 1314-1315 Nancy Glidden 2/19/2019 10:38 advising District regarding contractor payment pick up1301, 1302, 1304-1305, 1306, 1308, 1310, 1312, 1314 Mark Groves 2/19/2019 1:03 District response1302, 1304, 1306 Nancy Glidden 2/19/2019 1:05 attorney seeking confirmation1304, 1306 Mark Groves 2/19/2019 1:07 District confirming

1308, 1310 Kevin Campbell 2/19/2019 2:17District providing new information re: contractor payment pick up

1312, 1314 Kevin Campbell 2/19/2019 2:49 confirming payment picked up1316, 1317, 1318 Daniel LePera 2/22/2019 5:00 discussion of termination of contractor

1320 Mark Groves 2/25/2019 2:47notifying attorneys of issues with punchlist and contractor's comments

1330 Mark Groves 2/25/2019 2:54explaining issues with contractor schedule and performance

1356, 1357, 1358-1359, 1361, 1367, 1449, 1497 Mark Groves

Daniel LePera, Timothy Burns 2/26/2019 9:12 explaining District's thought process

1357, 1358, 1360-1361, 1366-1367, 1448-1449, 1496-1497, Daniel LePera

Mark Groves, Timothy Burns 2/26/2019 9:25 asking for documentation

1366 Mark Groves 2/26/2019 10:58 delay and contractor issues, schedule issues

1448 Mark Groves 2/26/2019 11:00re-sending 10:58 email (undeliverable due to size, so sendign in batches)

1542, 1578, 1580-1581, 1607-1608, 1764-1765 Daniel LePera 2/26/2019 3:42 discussion of draft termination letter and exhibits1544-1577 draft termination letter and exhibits for District review

1578 Mark Groves 2/26/2019 3:56 answering questions in 3:42 email and discussing exhibits1580 Mark Groves 2/26/2019 4:58 (ident discussion of draft termination letter and exhibits1582-1597 draft termination letter with District changes1598 Mark Groves 2/26/2019 5:48 issue with submittal schedule

1609-1642

email attachment (forwarding to other District representatives for review) - draft termination letter and exhibits for District review

1643, 1678, 1679, 1680-1681, 1682-1683, 1718, 1720-1721, 1757, 1759-1760, 1762-1763, 1801-1803 Daniel LePera 2/28/2019 5:31

email transmitting final draft of termination letter and discussion changes

1644-1677final draft of termination letter and exhibits for District review

1678 Kevin Campbell 3/1/2019 5:24 District response to letter and need to discuss1679, 1680 Mark Groves 3/1/2019 11:32 District asking question about letter

1682, 1718, 1720, 1756, 1759, 1762, 1800-1801 Daniel LePera 3/1/2019 1:36

final draft of termination letter and exhibits for District review

1684-1717final draft of termination letter and exhibits for District review

1718, 1756, 1758-1759, 1761, 1800 Kevin Campbell 3/1/2019 1:56 email updating lawyer on status of letter signing1766-1799 attachment of draft termination letter & exhibits1813-1846 attachment of draft termination letter & exhibits1847, 1879, 1881, 1888-1889, 1900 Mark Groves 3/7/2019 7:16 issues with updated schedule1879, 1881, 1888, 1889-1900 Daniel LePera 3/8/2019 3:58 questions regarding communications with contractor

1890 Mark GrovesDaniel LePera, Nancy Glidden 3/11/2019 11:57 discussion of change order

1902 Mark GrovesDaniel LePera, Nancy Glidden 3/11/2019 1:57 issues with concrete mix

1914 Mark Groves Daniel LePera 3/12/2019 3:39 discussion of change order1919, 1921 Mark Groves Daniel LePera 3/13/2019 1:42 discussion of change order1921 Daniel LePera Mark Groves 3/13/2019 2:43 attorney response to change order discussion, advice1924, 1929, 1945-1946 Mark Groves

Daniel LePera, Kevin Campbell 3/14/2019 3:38 Dsitrict position on change order issues

1929, 1945 Daniel LePera 3/15/2019 10:14 discusion of response regarding change order issue

1933 Mark GrovesDaniel LePera, Kevin Campbell, Timothy Burns 3/15/2019 12:04

updating attorney on issues with schedule and schedule update

1968, 1970, 1973, 1975, 1978-1979 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 3/19/2019 11:27 outstanding invoices issues and discussion

1970 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 3/19/2019 12:28 outstanding invoices issues and discussion

1973, 1975, 1978 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 3/19/2019 12:48 outstanding invoices issues and discussion

1975, 1978 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 3/19/2019 12:53 attorney advice regading outstanding invoice discussion

1978 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 3/19/2019 1:31

asking for attorney advice on how to proceed with outstanding invoice issues

1981, 1982-1983, 1988, 1990-1991 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Mark Allen Groces, Daniel LePera 3/20/2019 5:19 contract interpretation

1982, 1987-1988, 1990 Mark Groves

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 3/20/2019 6:22 contract interpretation

1984, 1992 Daniel LePeraJohn Scully, Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 3/21/2019 9:24

transmitting draft termination resolution for Board for District review

1985-1986 draft termination resolution

1987, 1989-1990 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves, Daniel LePera 3/21/2019 9:40 contract interpretation

1989 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 3/21/2019 9:50 contract interpretation

1994-1995 draft termination resolution

1996, 2008 Mark GrovesDaniel LePera, Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 3/22/2019 12:04

District review & mark up of schedule and progress update for attorneys

1997-2007 District mark up of schedule for attorneys2010, 2015, 2054-2055 Daniel LePera

Mark Groves, Kevin Campbell 3/22/2019 12:20 final termination letter and exhibits explained

2011-2014 final termination letter with redlines2015, 2054 Daniel LePera Mark Groves 3/22/2019 7:55 final exhibits for District review explained2016-2053 exhibits for review2054 Mark Groves Daniel LePera 3/25/2019 12:44 District's review of final termination letter

2056, 2099 Daniel LePeraKevin campbell, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 3/25/2019 7:30 final termination letter and exhibits

2057-2098, 2100-2141 final termination letter and exhibits for signature

2042, 2143 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 3/26/2019 11:24

discussion with bonding company re: termination of contractor

2143 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 3/26/2019 11:27 District response

2144, 2147-2148, 2150-2151, 2158-2159 James Scanlon

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell, Dennis Brown, Tammi Florio, Linda Cherashore, Ross Unruh 3/26/2019 12:39 seeking attorney review of proposed communication

2145, 2149, 2152, 2160 proposed communication2153, 2161 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 3/26/2019 2:31 electrical contractor claim2161 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/26/2019 2:57 electrical contractor claim

2163 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/26/2019 4:52 discussion about attached certification letter and site visit2168 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campell 3/27/2019 8:37 discussion about site visit2172, 2173 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 3/27/2019 12:10 seeking bonding company documents2182, 2190, 2191-2192 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campell 3/27/2019 4:54

explaining communications with bonding company regarding terminated contractor

2190, 2191 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Mark Groves 3/28/2019 8:14 discussion regarding terminated contractor/subs

2191 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/28/2019 8:29 discussion regarding terminated contractor/subs

2199, 2200-2201 Kevin CampbellLauren Shea, Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 3/28/2019 11:46 District impression of letter from opposing counsel

2200 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Lauren Shea, Mark Groves 3/28/2019 12:00 Counsel impression/plan for response to letter

2202 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/28/2019 12:45 informing District of conversation2203, 2207 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/28/2019 1:30 informing District of voicemail

2204 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, John Scully, Mark Groves 3/28/2019 1:03 advising District on public comment

2207 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 3/28/2019 2:09 District response to voicemail2208, 2210 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/28/2019 3:05 response to opposing counsel letter2209 draft response to opposing counsel letter2211, 2212, 2233-2234 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/29/2019 11:20 issue re: roof exposure2212 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 3/29/2019 11:35 answers to issue re: roof exposure2213, 2235 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 3/29/2019 11:59 schedule updates and concerns

2233 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Mark Groves 3/29/2019 11:44 answers to issue re: roof exposure

2238 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 3/29/2019 6:35discussion re: letter from opposing counsel, forwards letter

2261, 2280, 2283 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Mark Groves 4/1/2019 9:56

discussion re: letter from opposing counsel, dicsusion of contractor's performance

2288, 2299, 2337, 2394-2395, Daniel LePera Mark Groves 4/3/2019 2:47 counsel asking for adidtional information from District2289 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/4/2019 12:40 re: letter from electrical prime contractor2292 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/4/2019 12:42 re: list of approved workers to be on site2294 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/4/2019 12:47 discussion re: RFI re: window issue

2297 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/4/2019 4:15 discussion re: meeting with bond company and contractor

2337, 2394 Mark Groves Daniel LePera 4/8/2019 3:54transmitting records for RTKL request, comments on records

2338-2393 records transmitted for lawyers review for RTKL request

2396 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Daniel LePera, Kevin Campbell 4/8/2019 3:57

discussion re: contractor's last payment application and issues with perfomance

2410, 2412, 2414 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/9/2019 12:40 communciation re: meeting plan2416, 2417, 2419 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/9/2019 3:29 communciation re: meeting plan2421, 2422, 2445, 2447-2448 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/10/2019 2:38 seeking documents requested by bonding company

2422, 2424, 2447 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Mark Groves 4/10/2019 3:19 clarifying requests and providing some responses

2424 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/10/2019 3:30 providing clarification and additionla information

2427 Mark GrovesKevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden 4/10/2019 3:52 providing thoughts on documents request and answers

2430, 2431, 2433-2435, 2437, 2440-2442, 2479, 2484-2486 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/11/2019 5:49

discussion of contract provisions, contract interpretation, payment dispute

2431, 2433, 2436-2437, 2440, 2478-2479, 2484 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/12/2021 8:46


2433, 2436, 2439, 2478, 2483-2484 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/12/2019 10:02


2436, 2438, 2477, 2482-2483 Kevin Campbell

Nancy Glidden, Mark Groves 4/12/2019 10:19 discussion re: bonding company's take over

2438, 2482 Mark GrovesKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/12/2019 10:40 discussion re: bonding company's take over

2443, 2444 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/12/2010 11:15 discussion re: payment to contractor and cutting of checks

2444 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/12/2019 11:34 discussion re: payment to contractor and cutting of checks2447 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/12/2019 10:09 answering questions re: payment of invoices2491, 2493, 2495, 2497, 2501 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 4/15/2019 4:33

questions re: whether agreement for contractors to be on site

2493, 2495, 2497, 2500 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 4/15/2019 4:34 responding to questions re: agreement2495, 2497, 2500 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 4/15/2019 4:36 discussion re: contractors to be on site2497, 2500 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 4/15/2019 4:38 discussion re: contractors to be on site2500 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 4/15/2019 4:50 discussion re: contractors to be on site2503 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/15/2019 5:01 discussion re: resolving termination2504, 2506, 2507, 2508, 2511, 2514, 2518 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/15/2019 5:50 discussion re: resolving termination

2505 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden. Lauren Shea, Kevin Campbell 4/15/2019 6:00 discussion re: documents requsted by bonding company

2506, 2507, 2508, 2511, 2514, 2518 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/15/2019 6:33 discussion re: resolving termination2507, 2508, 2511, 2514, 2518 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/15/2019 7:56 discussion re: resolving termination2508, 2511, 2514, 2517 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/15/2019 7:54 discussion re: resolving termination2510, 2513-2514, 2516-2517 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/16/2019 9:48 discussion re: resolving termination2513, 2516 Kevin Campbell Nancy Glidden 4/16/2019 10:15 discussion re: resolving termination2516 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/16/2019 10:19 discussion re: resolving termination

2520, 2522, 2524, 2525, 2526-2527, 2529, 2532 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 4/16/2019 10:43 issues with contractor's performance and supervision2521 attachment re: performance and supervisiion2524,2525, 2526, 2529, 2532 Kevin Campbell

Mark Groves, Nancy Glidden 4/16/2019 10:48 issues with contractor's performance and supervision

2526, 2528, 2531 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/16/2019 10:50 issues with contractor's performance and supervision

2528, 2531 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 4/16/2019 11:24 issues with contractor's performance and supervision

2530, 2533, 2535, 2537, 2539-2540, 2542, 25544-2545, 2547-2548, 2550-2551, 2553-2554, 2558-2559 Nancy Glidden

Kevin Campbell, Mark Groves 4/16/2019 11:27 discussion re: resolving termination

2533, 2535, 2537, 2539, 2541, 2544, 2547, 2550, 2553, 2557 Mark Groves

Nancy Glidden, Kevin Campbell 4/16/2019 11:32

conversation with bonding compnay, payment of invoices issues

2535, 2537, 2539, 2541, 2543, 2547, 2550, 2553, 2557 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 4/16/2019 11:32


2537, 2539, 2541, 2543, 2546, 2550, 2553, 2557 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 4/16/2019 11:34


2539, 2541, 2543, 2546, 2549, 2552-2553, 2556 Nancy Glidden Mark Groves 4/16/2019 11:37


2541, 2543, 2546, 2549, 2552, 2556 Mark Groves Nancy Glidden 4/16/2019 11:40


2564, 2570 Mark GrovesKevin Campbell, Nancy Glidden 4/18/2019 5:14 issue with RFI for glass company

2570 Nancy GliddenMark Groves, Kevin Campbell 4/18/2019 5:17 issue with RFI for glass company

2578, 2580, 2582 Nancy Glidden Kevin Campbell 4/19/2019 11:25 discussion of work approvals

2580, 2582 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Mark Groves 4/22/2019 7:49 discussion of work approvals

2582 Mark GrovesNancy Glidden, Mark Campbell 4/22/2019 8:51 discussion of work approvals

2589, 2730 Nancy GliddenKevin Campbell, Daniel LePera 4/25/2019 11:39 discussion re: complaint filed by contractor

2730 Kevin CampbellNancy Glidden, Daniel LePera 4/28/2019 12:51 discussion re: complaint filed by contractor

final determination in the matter of francis …

Documents