final amendment to the supplemental risk assessment · a supplemental risk assessment was completed...

128
Si;rcrfunJ RLXOKJ^ Cti.tcr Sl'It: N '•• . '' '' ;\ BKl"\K: USAGE CONTRACT NO. DACW33-94-D-0002 n i jjhR' TASK ORDER NO. 007 TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT NORWOOD PCB SUPERFUND SITE Norwood, Massachusetts May 2002 Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New England District Concord, Massachusetts

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Si ; r c r funJ RLXOKJ^ Cti.tcrSl ' I t : N '•• . '' '' ;\BKl"\K:

USAGE CONTRACT NO. DACW33-94-D-0002 n i j j h R 'TASK ORDER NO. 007

TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT

FINALAMENDMENT TO THE

SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENTNORWOOD PCB SUPERFUND SITE

Norwood, Massachusetts

May 2002

Prepared for

U.S. Army Corps of EngineersNew England District

Concord, Massachusetts

Page 2: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

May 28, 2002TC02-007-065No Response Required

Mr. Timothy BeaucheminProject ManagerU.S. Army Corps of EngineersNew England District696 Virginia RoadConcord, MA 01742-2751

SUBJECT: USAGE CONTRACT NO. DACW33-94-D-0002TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACTNORWOOD GROUND WATER REMEDIATION - DELIVERY ORDER # 007FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT

Dear Mr. Beauchemin:

Foster Wheeler Environmental (Foster Wheeler) is pleased to submit ten (10) copies of the FinalAmendment to the Supplemental Risk Assessment (SRA) for the Norwood PCB Site. This FinalAmendment is being submitted in accordance with Contract Modification # 000736 dated March 8, 2002under the above referenced Contract for your review. Foster Wheeler has incorporated responses to allcomments received on the Draft Amendment and attached a response to comments as Appendix D.

If you have any questions or comments, please let me know. Thank-you for your continued confidence inFoster Wheeler's ability to support your needs.

Sincerely,

3tri, PE, QEP5roject Manager

Norwood PCB Site

cc: R. Marnicio, Boston

File: PM 1.1DO #7: 2.2

133 FEDERAL STREET, 6TH FLOOR, BOSTON, MA 02110 TEL: 617-457-8200 FAX: 617-457-8498/8499

Page 3: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

USAGE CONTRACT NO. DAC \V33-94-D-0002TASK ORDER NO. 007

TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT

FINALAMENDMENT TO THE

SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENTNORWOOD PCB SUPERFUND SITE

Norwood, Massachusetts

May 2002

Prepared for

U.S. Army Corps of EngineersNew England District

Concord, Massachusetts

Prepared by

Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation133 Federal Street

Boston, MA 02110

Revision1

Date5/24/02

Prepared ByA. Chou

Approved ByJ. Nicotri, PE, QEPR. Marmcio, PhD, PE

Pages AffectedAll

TD02-0425/24,02

Page 4: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

2.0 REVISED SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL 2-1

3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN 3-1

4.0 SOURCE TERM AND EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS 4-1

5.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 5-15.1 Dermal Absorption Exposure Parameters 5-15.2 Inhalation Exposure Parameters 5-35.3 Fate and Transport Parameters 5-5

6.0 TOXICOLOGICAL PARAMETERS 6-1

7.0 HUMAN HEALTH RISK CHARACTERIZATION 7-1

8.0 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS 8-18.1 Selection of Chemicals of Potential Concern 8-18.2 Selection of Exposure Point Concentrations 8-18.3 Toxicological Factors 8-38.4 Exposure Scenario 8-38.5 Volatilization Estimates 8-4

9.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9-1

10.0 REFERENCES 10-1

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1 Site Conceptual Model 2-2

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3-1 Contaminants of Potential Concern 3-2Table 4-1 Exposure Point Concentrations 4-2Table 5-1 Input Values and Assumptions Used to Estimate Average Daily Dose 5-2Table 5-2 Screening for "Volatile" Chemicals 5-4Table 5-3 Input Values and Assumptions Used to Estimate Volatilization Factor 5-6Table 5-4 Normalized Emission Rates Calculated Using the WATERS Model 5-7Table 6-1 Chronic Oral and Dermal Reference Doses 6-2Table 6-2 Chronic Inhalation Reference Concentrations 6-3Table 6-3 Oral and Dermal Cancer Slope Factors 6-4Table 6-4 Inhalation Cancer Unit Risks 6-5Table 7-1 Summary of Receptor Risks and Hazards for COPCs 7-2Table 8-1 Comparison of the Maximum Groundwater Concentrations Used in the

SHHRA and this Analysis 8-2

TD02-0425/24/02

Page 5: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results Quarterly Grounds ater MonitoringRounds 19-22 Norwood PCB Superfund Site

Appendix B Risk Assessment Calculation SpreadsheetsAppendix C Development of the Volatilization FactorAppendix D Annotated Responses to Review Comments on Draft Amendment to the Supplemental

Risk Assessment

TD02-0425/24 02

Page 6: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler) has prepared this Amendment to theSupplemental Risk Assessment for the Norwood PCB Superfund Site for Task Order No 007 underContraet No DACW33-94-D-0002 This Amendment addresses the potential risk to a futureconstruction worker that may be exposed to the contaminated gioundwater at the former Grant Gear Site(site) located in Norwood, Massachusetts.

An ini t ia l Groundwater Risk Assessment for this site \vas completed in 1998 by GZA on behalf of TargetStores (GZA, 1998) The Groundwater Risk Assessment, focusing only on groundsater, evaluatedexposures to chemicals that may volatilize from groundwater into the indoor air of a proposed buildingand environmental exposures to groundwater that may discharge to Meadow Brook A SupplementalRisk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998Groundwater Risk Assessment (Foster Wheeler, 2000a) The Supplemental Risk Assessment consistedof two parts: 1) a human health risk assessment; and 2) a screening level ecological risk assessment Thesupplemental human health risk assessment (SHHRA) focused on the potential inhalation of compoundsvolatilized from contaminated subsurface soil and groundwater in a possible future commercial buildingthat could be constructed on the site. The screening level ecological risk assessment focused on thepotential impacts of the discharge of contaminated groundwater to Meadow Brook This Amendmentaddresses an additional scenario relating to the potential exposures of a future construction worker to thesite groundwater This scenario was not previously evaluated quantitatively in the SHHRA or the GZAassessment. This Amendment was prepared using the same assumptions and methodology as theSHHRA, where possible and appropriate, and followed current guidance and requirements applicable to aMassachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 3 Risk Characterization

The results of the analysis indicated that the calculated hazard index exceeded the MADEP target level(i e., 27 vs. 1) and the calculated carcinogenic risk slightly exceeded the MADEP target level(i.e , 1.4x10 5 vs. 1 OxlO"5) for a hypothetical future construction worker exposed to the site groundwater.These projected results are based on an assumption of repetitive derma] and inhalation exposure over thecourse of a construction effort that may be associated with a new commercial building The elevated riskand hazard index results relative to the MADEP target levels are essentially all the result of the detectedAroclor compounds in the groundwater and the potential direct contact exposure route (i.e , absorbingPCBs through the skin).

The exposure parameters associated with the duration and manner of exposure that were assumed for thisanalysis are believed to be conservative, and consistent with the concept of "reasonable maximumexposure". It should be noted that the analysis takes no mitigative credit for the prevention of dermalcontact with the groundwater by usual worker attire (e.g., steel toed boots, work gloves, overalls, etc.).The analysis also is believed to be conservative relative to the selection of the chemicals of potentialconcern (COPCs), the exposure point concentrations assumed, and the choice of the lexicological factorsapplied (as discussed in Section 8). As such, actual groundwater contaminant exposures to a typicalconstruction worker would very likely be appreciably less that what are projected here.

Because the dermal absorption of COPCs through direct contact was seen to dominate the potentialexposures, it is recommended that any future construction activity include the following provisions:

• Dewatenng excavations if standing water may persist in areas where workers may come intoincidental contact with it; and

• Require the use of watertight boots, gloves, and overalls (e.g., a Tyvek suit) whenever workmust be performed in an area where pooled groundwater is present.

TD02 W2 £g_ j5 2-4 02

Page 7: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler) has prepared this Amendment to theSupplemental Risk Assessment for the Norwood PCB Superfund Site for Task Order No 007 underContract No DACW33-94-D-0002. Notice to Proceed on this \\ork was given to Foster Wheeler onMarch 12, 2002 This Amendment addresses the potential risk to a future construction worker that maybe exposed to the contaminated groundwater at the former Grant Gear Site (site) located in Norwood,Massachusetts.

The Norwood PCB Superfund Site is approximately 26 acres in size and is located in acommercial/industrial area adjacent to a residential area. The former Grant Gear Site is approximately8 6 acres of the Norwood PCB Superfund Site and is the subject of this risk assessment. Themanufacturing building formerly occupied by Grant Gear has been demolished with the foundation andfloor slab left in place and the site capped Remedial Investigations conducted at the site identifiedpolychlonnated byphenyls (PCBs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and volatile organic compounds(VOCs) in soil, groundwater, and sediment.

In 1989, USEPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Norwood PCB Superfund Site. The selectedremedy specified in the ROD was groundwater extraction and treatment coupled with excavation andon-site solvent extraction of unsaturated zone PCB-contammated soil and shallow sediment in MeadowBrook The selected remedy for soil and sediment was subsequently changed in a ROD Modification forconsolidation of contaminated soils and sediments on-site followed by capping the site

A groundwater treatment plant was operated from February 1996 to June 2000 to manage the migrationof contaminants through active groundwater extraction and to remediate extracted groundwater throughon-site physical-chemical treatment. Quarterly groundwater monitoring is ongoing and the most recentresults constitute the data used in this Amendment to the Supplemental Risk Assessment

An initial Groundwater Risk Assessment for this site was completed in 1998 by GZA on behalf of TargetStores (GZA, 1998) The Groundwater Risk Assessment, focusing only on groundwater, evaluatedexposures to chemicals that may volatilize from groundwater into the indoor air of a proposed buildingand environmental exposures to groundwater that may discharge to Meadow Brook.

A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision tothe 1998 Groundwater Risk Assessment (Foster Wheeler, 2000a). The Supplemental Risks Assessmentconsisted of two parts: 1) a human health risk assessment; and 2) a screening level ecological riskassessment The supplemental human health risk assessment (SHHRA) focused on the potentialinhalation of compounds volatilized from contaminated subsurface soil and groundwater in a possiblefuture commercial building that could be constructed on the site. The screening level ecological riskassessment focused on the potential impacts of the discharge of contaminated groundwater to MeadowBrook

This Amendment addresses an additional scenario relating to the potential exposures of a futureconstruction worker to the site groundwater. This scenario was not previously evaluated quantitatively inthe SHHRA or the GZA assessment. This Amendment was prepared using the same assumptions andmethodology as the SHHRA, where possible and appropriate, and followed current guidance andrequirements applicable to a Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 3 Risk Characterization.

TD02 CM2524 02

Page 8: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

2.0 REVISED SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

A Site Conceptual Model (SCM) was developed for the SHHRA That SCM had four main objectives'

• To identify the potential sources of the volatile chemicals of potential concern (COPCs) inthe environmental media at the site;

• To identify the mechanisms by which the COPCs may be released, move betweenenvironmental media, and be transported through the environment;

• To identify the human receptors that could come into contact with the affected environmentalmedia, and

• To identify the routes of intake by which the target populations may be exposed.

That SCM was revised for this Amendment to address a potential future construction scenario. Thisscenario would involve a possible future construction worker at the site who is excavating a portion ofthe property for a foundation of a future building. Groundwater from beneath the site may infiltrate intothe excavation such that standing groundwater could exist in this open excavation. Conservativelyassuming that the excavation would not be dewatered, a construction worker could come into contactwith the standing groundwater in the open excavation and be exposed to the site's COPCs via dermalabsorption and the inhalation of volatiles released into the ambient air breathing space. The revised SCMis shown in Figure 2-1. The dashed lines on Figure 2-1 indicate these additional pathways which areevaluated in this Amendment to the Supplemental Risk Assessment.

TD02 042 2 15 2 4 0 2

Page 9: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

H2UJ

00ooujoo00<oo2K

uj 5

§«§2

< S S^ ^ t£r S Pi K „

rW, -> SU <| VZ H £0 2 9U H O

|||DH Q

,-—i O-< >^

00

DOI—tPu

UJffiHOHH

W

Q

w

P °Z o-uj tuH UO UJ

w

00

X oiUJ

s

gg

Q

IS8§UJ ^oo

U

U

00

si< Z

[Jj

>-< ooS w3 u

Ooo

Page 10: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

The focus of the Amendment to the SHHRA is the potential risk associated with the migration andinhalation of \olatile chemicals in the groundwater An entire year of the most recent, availableground\\ater quality monitoring data \\as used to establish the groundwater database for this assessment(Quarterly Monitoring Rounds 19-22) (Foster Wheeler, 2000b, Foster Wheeler, 200la; Foster Wheeler,2001b, Foster Wheeler and Nobis, 2001) Use of a full year's worth of data was considered to provide arepresentative basis for estimating potential exposures in this assessment

A conservative process of selecting COPCs was laid out in the "Guidance for Disposal Site RiskCharacterization" (MADEP, 1995) This process was designed to carry most of the constituents detectedat a site through the nsk assessment calculations. The COPCs are first selected based on the list of all oiland hazardous material (OHM) detected in the grounds ater during Quarterly Monitoring Rounds 19-22Summary tables for the data collected during these quarterly monitoring rounds are presented inAppendix A. Detected OHM include those constituents that were detected above the sample quantitationlimit (SQL), including those constituents that were qualified with a "J" (estimated). From this initial list,constituents may be eliminated only if certain specified criteria are met These criteria are:

• OHM with low frequencies of detection (less than 1 in 20 samples) and low concentration(less than minimum sample quantitation limit);

• OHM less than or consistent with background values; and

• OHM that are field or laboratory contaminants not related to the OHM release.

No toxicological screening or risk-based benchmarks were used as criteria for eliminating COPCs for thisAmendment. Similarly, no COPCs were eliminated on the basis of being an essential human nutrient.Based on an analysis of the data compiled for this nsk assessment, none of the detected chemicals weredetected at low frequencies and low concentrations. In addition, none of the detected chemicals arenaturally occurring and, as such, a comparison of measured site concentrations to backgroundconcentrations is not appropriate as a rationale for excluding a detected OHM from the set of COPCs.Similarly, none of the detected volatiles are common laboratory contaminants. A table summarizing theCOPC selection process is presented as Table 3-1.

TD02 042 -> iS 2 4 0 2

Page 11: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

reco«5oc

"o

= re£" * aE £ ut *- c

C °" U0o

vo.E _

3 reC 1***

X

S

E Qyi si as gS I/]

inw ~a. EE j™ c "~

o I i1

c? c5I

co

re re?0) i: o>

ucoo

|5S c35 o^O ^ =d>»— *- O>0 c.2.0) 0)Ol Oc cre oa: u

"5 CM?

0 =C 0Q) **3 0cr «a> ou. O

o

0 Z

Oil

or

Haz

ardo

usM

ate

rial

re "o •— •

II

CO CO CO CO CO COLLJ UJ LLJl LU UJ UJ

§"~ 0

0CN CN

frt*CO CO13cCO

—3

0CNO

-

cra

0CM0

Io0CM

0 o 0o X oCM c^ CM

o -1 < \k

5CO

~i >• *•*< >• CDgulr;

iio

^

° CM

o o

CO O>

ggUJ UJ

z z

0CMO

C/3ICO CO CO CO CO COUJ UJ LLJ UJ LLJ LLJ UJ

§ '5§§CM g g CM

*- o0 0O CM

^vCM »- | CM ,-

^ Q- O)

™ 1 <

OCNO

CO

2g

i

1

h-

CNO

-r-

LLJ

CMCM0

co

c/jltoUJ UJ

•r- 0 *- --O O O OO CN O OCM «, CM CM

CCO

Q.<

CM OO

? Q.

CN Cslgo

<!<!< <

$iiil

o o o oCD »— to i- T- in

5s m CM m° ;.CM **

CM

i i~z. z

O> Q.

<'*

CM

0

<

ii

,.,. o o oin i-

s^ 0CM

" "

g

CMO

CD

1

m mCM

'o'o

CO CO

i

enro

O 0O ;— , O

^

CM . .CM

Is- , CNCM

O

10)

1,1

2-T

richl

oroe

th,

o

fD

O O O

CM

0

CO CO

O CM0) T-

oo>inoin

"ro

Si

h-sCOo

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

en<

Chl

orob

enze

ne

I

u oo o

CO

OO5

CM

CO

O

Or~- CN r-

co m ' mN - inO

1

CO co r?

*- COCN

.CD CO10 .-ID 1in CM

0>c£

cis-

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oetr

OO>

ino

<DC

fi-t

Tet

rach

loro

ethe

ne

8

O

9CM

Cro

OO

S

CO

o>in

o0

Q-,

CMO

<

g

g

inCM

o0

o o 'o

T- CO

co m^ »-

OJ ^

en *-in

'

CM CN

roCM

CD

O

Tnc

hlor

oelh

ene

OO

S

,_

CMCO0CN

<DCCDKl

Vin

yl C

hlor

ide

OO

1 2

4-T

nchl

orob

en

^

CM

CM

m0)

c

loro

benz

e

oQ

CM

*~

o oO OCO CO

T.ro

m

CDc

loro

benz

e

oQCO

CM

*- CO

' 1 'CO -*J

TJ- r . CDot°|°

CM CM

2,"

i

o

cnCN0>CD

Sin

c

loro

benz

e

£

O4

CM

|

O)

VCNCM

CDCN

CO

CN

jU OO O m> > 0CO CO D.

CDO0.

CN

CD

,_

(0

1

SCM

O

COOQ.

O) -Q yj y>

- ® S i E E75 u o ^ Dc *- c c

^^ t. S= yr fl> x ^^i "o * s ™ ™S1™ ?§ 3 -o -Do Sc? ff « ^B^Q ~O -p JI ^ ®

9 c

1;

Page 12: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

4.0 SOURCE TERM AND EXPOSURE POINT C'ONCENTRATIONS

When the SHI IRA was conducted (in April 2000), the ground\vater treatment plant was still in operationFor the future conditions scenario in the SHHRA, projected post-remediation groundwater concentrations\vere needed An analysis was performed of the groundwater data that had been collected up to that timeto obser\e trends in groundwater movement, concentration patterns, and apparent contaminantdegradation activity It was noted that the grounduater data, after four years of operating thegroundwater treatment plant, suggested a remnant organic source as an explanation for the continuedpresence of chlorinated compounds at the levels observed It was finally determined that due touncertainties associated with the source concentrations, maximum observed groundwater concentrationscould be used as an approximation of future concentrations For a further discussion of degradationpatterns, see Section 8

Similarly, for this Amendment to the Supplemental Risk Assessment, the groundwater concentrationsmost recently observed were used as an approximation of future concentrations Given the inherentuncertainty regarding the subsurface conditions and possible remnant source material, maximum detectedconcentrations from the samples collected at site-wide wells during Quarterly Monitoring Rounds 19through 22 were used as the exposure point concentrations (EPCs) for the groundwater COPCs Thesemaximum concentrations are shown in Table 4-1.

TD02 042 A j5/24 02

Page 13: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oQ.

incgro"c0)oc

,- 0

^coQ.0

^* 8-O Q.ro x1- UJ

0

ctSL

CO. CD0 O

1^"O Oc o3 5siED

2 co

c £i

'£. !„* «=ii .t o>» I Eo • "Q. 0x 5

UJ 0

Q)

W 1< 3u z

"reo

il or

Haz

ardo

us M

at

0

re "o *•"•'E °-II0 O

1

!

CMCM0

0

inoo

h-CM

ii

0 CM

O t-~ CMCDinoin

1 ,2-

Tric

hlor

oeth

ane

ro

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e (to

l

*- *-I

oo

oo

> >

0

CDO

hlor

oben

zene

0

oO>

CDinCDin

!

COoo0

CD

0

T imCD

CM

s-1

,2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

o

oo>

0(D

m

etra

chlo

roet

hene

0c-

ans-

1 ,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ei

P H

"* 0 0 °

!

CDv-o 5

m

T—

CMCOoCM

'ichl

oroe

then

e

K

CO

o0

, —

oinin

CO

inyl

Chl

orid

e

>

2,4-

Tnch

loro

benz

enc

--"

2-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

'-

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

--

oO>

!

oo o

o o o oo o > >

CD

o0

^_

(O

o

ft "- °°C) "* *o i '0 0 0

II

CD

CM

cSin

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

--

O 0o o> >

CM

CM

0

8<

mO

CDCDCMCM

CDCM

CD

CM

0

8<

mo

T_(£)r-o

aCM

0

8<

mo

>!> > CO CO'CO CO D- CL O_

"o cc go n>D. i;

0 § CMO c o o 'j= U CD

ro "o '-en £ 10*— o "OO 0 c0 0 gro r-"5 t O)> 3 c

I |iw E §11 0 2o -S >,O 5 "> <b tr»• " ™-S 0 O

le O

rgan

ic C

ompo

uni

ilonn

ated

Bip

heny

lnt

con

cent

ratio

n is

thin

gro

undw

ater

from

|£&i5> £ 2 EH II » 0

... O O x "0 > D. LU O

z E S

Page 14: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

5.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT

Based on the SC M, the only receptor identified for this Amendment to the Supplemental RiskAssessment \\as a potential future construction \vorker The primary exposure parameters andassumptions associated with the dermal absorption of COPC s and the inhalation of volatilizedcontaminants from standing groundwater in an open excavation are presented in Table 5-1 and discussedbelow

I he construction worker was assumed to be a potential future worker performing excavation and otherconstruction activities that disturb the site soils (e g , construction of a building foundation) for a limitedperiod When such an excavation is created, groundwater from beneath the site is assumed to infiltrateinto the excavation and form a standing pool of water The construction worker may be exposed to theCOPCs in this groundwater via dermal absorption ( e g , stepping or reaching into the water) andinhalation of volatile contaminants that may be released from the surface of the water into the ambient airbreathing space

5.1 Dermal Absorption Exposure Parameters

The chronic daily intake (CDI) equations for the dermal absorption exposure route for non-carcinogenicand carcinogenic OHM are shown below The parameter definitions and values are summarized inTable 5-1 Note that the DAeven, is further discussed on Table 5-1

CDI, Non-Carcinogen =DA"~' SA EV EF EP [mg/kg-day]BW AT-N

CDI,Carcinogen = DA™>-SA'EV EF EP [mg/kg-day]

A construction scenario including site preparation, excavation, utility placement, foundations, footings,backfilling, and building construction is assumed to take approximately 6 months for a building the sizeof the one assumed in the SHHRA However, an open excavation with infiltrated groundwater wouldonly be expected to be present at most for the first 3 months of the construction period As such,groundwater would only be available for contact during this time as the excavation and foundationinstallation work would be performed only at the earliest stages of the overall construction schedule Thefrequency of exposure to the groundwater was conservatively assumed to be 65 days/year, based on awork schedule of 5 days/week for 3 months. A site-specific value of 0 5 hours/event was based on anassumption that groundwater would infiltrate into the open excavation overnight and would be dewateredat the beginning of the following workday. It is assumed that contact with groundwater would mostlikely occur during this dewatenng process. The exposure period for the construction worker wasassumed to be 1 year, encompassing the entire 6-month construction period The event frequency isassigned the default value of 1 event/day (USEPA, 2001)

The construction worker's body weight was assumed to be 70 9 kg, the 50th percentile value for maleadults, ages 18 to 25 years (MADEP, 1995).

The averaging period for non-carcinogenic effects was set equal to the exposure period (i e , 1 year) bydefinition (MADEP, 1995), expressed in days. The averaging period for carcinogenic effects wasassigned a lifetime value of 75 years (MADEP, 1995), expressed in days

TD02 042 c 15 2 4 0 2

Page 15: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

8Sra0CD m

? 5I =

3 5 ti s «|| ||Sa> ? "O o 2

! ill 1 1 I| O < u. O O Z

1 C 0

* - I EuS ? •§ ^ S

o a < p 2

•s b b 9 20 > a s s | 3S ^ S S S ^ a o ;

K ^ i r o r w S u j u j

I75O"UJ

o

Ito

75

OT

C

c

s

totuQ-

£

d

V

ULU

CD

CDCO

COCO

C-p <D

Q) *

Q) +

*c 5f

0) C

£ £

f " i ?• IH I - o *" £? ? ^ 0 C

1 I '2 ^ 'S ? $Q. CL C , C «t ,,LU LU s r1 S f- §

« tu Eb £ o. C o> 2

JUJ II UJ 5 I 0 I f Q

§"*• e "* ^ ^ 8 IT

d l S ? S S S S o l

z < 5 < „ « < g < 1 g- O - O i - J s O i s O o )Q O ^ O> o> oU O S fc 0 £

toT N

- 1 ?J_ ' ' ^^ "~~" ' ' ' ' -^ . "~" ' ' ^^ ^~ ' ' ' '(0 ^ "^U) a

•E 'E ^ *^O O O V

Q. cL a. Q. £ JD y-jW ^ W W W y ^ r e t f l a i ^ h - Q

E E £ E o O ^5 « « *O O O O

,_ c "c >• ^

E ^ c E s ^ c ^ r o ' 3 ' - " 0 " ^ ^= 0 0 0 = > -0

S o*- CD — w

I !«i0 f X >

I B ||| g

o i l ^1*1 3 gc « o O >, o — «i c £ £

• = ^ ^ E S ( ^ n ? i > s > - W - i - i V ^ Sg W § r o i i j c _ £ : ^ - c S ^ ^ 2 c c S

5 * O " r a E O O V> Q. !p LL 3 3 § O I C T 1 "

D L u i O ^ J L U p O UJ LU UJ CD < < O

1*~^ ^ T ^ Q

T t/) U- ^^ • J * - " ^ 1 1 j ill in m CL CL OD < <

c

« °O jj

z oH- H

S £QJ UJ

UJ UJ

a> u- u-

i c c c

32 g 2c 5 5 5

5^ 5~^- fO

^ s"™ "re 2- 2- i£. t:

OJ CP

1/1 (/>

ti*? •§ in _ g fi

E B f3E o

O

n

°> "" 1: | § s

i § cc i -E >- o S| b S z o

I| Illl§ § . ? £ * *§ I £ E ? E1

O M = 5 5) o)5 3 o o S J£ ^P S. a a> DJ- O X X > >O > uj u) < <

? u. u. o. ^ VT > UJ uj Q. Q.0 < <

Co753c

9 £

S S

S i aS to D

Page 16: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

The construction worker was assumed to typically \\car a short sleeved shirt, long pants and shoesHowever, if pooled ground\\ater was present, the construction worker could step into the pooled waterallowing their feet to get wet Thus, the exposed skin surface area (3,302 cm2) is the sum of the averageof the 50th percentile surface area for adult males and females ior the feet, hands, and forearms(UStPA, 2001)

5.2 Inhalation Exposure Parameters

Inhalation exposures are possible for the construction worker under the same construction scenariodiscussed in Section 5 1 Volatile chemicals present in the groundwater may be emitted into the ambientair breathing space for the construction worker once the groundwater infiltrates into the open excavation.Note that this pathway evaluation was limited to only those constituents which are "volatile" according tothe criterion that the constituent's vapor pressure is greater than 001 Torr (0.01 millimeters Mercury[mm Hg]) (MCP 310 CMR 40 0000) (see Table 5-2).

The exposed air concentration (CA) equations for the inhalation exposure route for non-carcinogenic andcarcinogenic OHM are shown below. The parameter definitions and values are summarized in Table 5-1.The volatilization factor (VFv,) is further discussed in Section 5.3

- v p EF EPCA,Non - Carcinogen = ^ [mg/kg-day]

AT-N

EF EP, Carcinogen = '- ^ [mg/kg-day]

AT-C

As discussed in Section 5.1, an open excavation with infiltrated groundwater would only be expected tobe present for the first 3 months of the assumed 6-month overall construction period. Thus, groundwaterwould only be available for exposure during this time. The frequency of exposure to the groundwaterwas assumed to be 65 days/year, based on a construction scenario consisting of 8 hours/day, 5 days/week,for 3 months The exposure period for the construction worker was assumed to be 1 year, encompassingthe entire 6-month construction period.

The averaging period for non-carcinogenic effects was set equal to the exposure period (i e., 1 year) bydefinition (MADEP, 1995), expressed in days. The averaging period for carcinogenic effects wasassigned a lifetime value of 75 years (MADEP, 1995), expressed in days.

To quantify the flux of volatile chemicals released into the ambient air breathing space, a volatilizationfactor (VF) was developed. The approach and input values used to develop the VF are discussed belowin Section 5.3

TD02 on c ->5/2402

Page 17: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Table 5-2Screening for "Volatile" ChemicalsMedium' GroundwaterExposure Medium' GroundwaterSite Norwood PCB Superfund Site

ChemicalGroup [1]

vocvocvocvocvocvocvocvocsvocsvocsvocsvocPCBPCBPCB

Oil or Hazardous Material

1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane1,2-Dichloroethene (total)Chlorobenzenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTetrachloroethenetrans-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTrichloroetheneVinyl Chloride1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneAroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1254

CAS Vapor Pressure Greater than 0.01Number [2] mm Hg? [3]

mm Hg790055405901089071 56592127184156605790167501412082195501541731106467534692191267229611097691

2520011.820019

33175

26600.181.5

2.281.2

0.00040.00050.00008

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Notes:[1] VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds; SVOC = Semivolatile Organic Compounds;

PCB = Polychlorinated Biphenyl[2] Vapor Pressure values from USEPA, 1995. Air Emissions Models for Waste and Wastewater.

WATERS. Version 4.0. EPA 453/R-94-080A May 1[3] MCP 310 CMR 40.0000. Constituents are considered "volatile" if the constituent's vapor pressure

is greater than 0.01 Torr (0.01 mm Hg)

TD02-0425/24/02 Page 1 of 1 EXP FAC xls; Vol Screen

Page 18: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

5.3 Fate anil Transport Parameters

The VF is defined as the ratio of the concentration of the dissolved \olat i le chemical m groundwater andthe concentration of the volatile chemical in the ambient air breathing space The basic assumptions usedto develop this factor are as follows

• VF was derived using Equation 59, from Section 3 I 2 "Air Dispersion Models, in the SoilScreening Guidance. Technical Background Document" (USEPA, 1996).

• The emission rate from the surface of the standing groundwater was assumed to beessentially constant over a range of concentrations observed at the site when normalized tothe concentration of the volatile in the grounds ater The chemical-specific emission rateswere calculated using the WATER8 model (USEPA, 1995)

• Air concentrations were developed using a gaussian plume-based dispersion factor tailored tothe size and geographic location of the excavation area

The equation used to calculate VF is shown below.

' CF3VF =

**

where:JJ <7U V

VFgw = Volatilization Factor from pooled groundwater to the breathing space above an open airexcavation [m3/L]

Q/C = Inverse of Mean Concentration at the Center of a Square Emission Source[g/sec-m2)/(kg/m3)]

CF3 = Conversion Factor [1 kg/ 1,000,000 mg]JaveN = Volatile emission rate calculated using the WATERS Model (USEPA, 1995) normalized

to the area of the excavation bottom and the maximum dissolved volatile chemicalconcentration in the groundwater [(g/sec-m2)/(mg/L)]

Table 5-3 presents the input values and assumptions used to estimate chemical-specific VFs. In addition,Table 5-4 presents the calculations used to calculate J a x eN- Appendix C presents further discussion aboutthe derivation of this model and the inputs to the WATERS Model.

TD02 0-12 C_<:5/2402

Page 19: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CO

in

Bro

1—

to E

stim

ate

Vol

atili

zatio

n F

acto

r |

"0

CO

sum

ptio

ns

c/l

•oroCO0)D

Inpu

t V

a

CD

Gro

undw

aM

ediu

m:

CD

Gro

undw

atM

ediu

m:

CD

3coOQ.X

LU

CD

CO

Sup

erfu

nd

COoo_

oo

oz

BCO

CD

c £o ro

.5 Zro _=> CDcr "oLU O

5

"Si *-3? oro cc CD° CDro "CD

CD

"ro

UJ

E

g

Par

amet

er D

efin

n

i_

73 CD

E ^2 oD_

^~

B75

CDCD

CO

i ,^~

•oB75OroO

-j

"E

S75IIC +±=> 5\_ ro

CO °^ XTO LUCD i_o <

Gro

undw

ater

Vol

atili

zatio

n F

acto

r fo

rto

the

Bre

athi

ng S

pace

abo

ve a

n O

p<

i?>

i ,CM

in

m

"E•^Q.

"EisCD

OCO<D

njcr

•*"ol_

Inve

rse

of M

ean

Con

cent

ratio

n at

Ce

y*-*

COo

oT—

0)

75)

Con

vers

ion

Fac

tor

3

LL

^

1 »

co^

B

oro0

ijfrM

5?

[Vol

atile

Em

issi

on R

ate

?->

i ,^t~

CM

^t

CO

E

-DCro

g75>rooX

LUCD

Ave

rage

Vel

ocity

of t

he A

ir F

low

Ove

Ove

r th

e P

oole

d G

roun

dwat

er

ro->

i—iin

mCM

E

[Len

gth

of O

pen

Air

Exc

ava

tion

_i

i—t r—^

LO LO

OO CO

E E

Wid

th o

f O

pen

Air

Exc

avat

ion

Dep

th o

f O

pen

Air

Exc

avat

ion

§ Q

, ,CD

oT—

O

E

cg75royLUt_

<

CDfl

o0)

Dep

th o

f S

tand

ing

Gro

undw

ater

in th

i

o>Q

, •,r^~

^-0

LUlO

^ —

_to

"E

Gro

undw

ater

Flo

w R

ate

COC*

^—i r—

CO O)

^ CN

JZ

g

1°1"

Gen

eral

Bio

rate

Poo

led

Gro

undw

ater

Tem

pera

ture

n: >0 6>as t-

c^1

^

CO

V)

E

Tim

e f

or E

mis

sion

s F

rom

Exc

avat

ion

CD.EUJ

rocCDQ.OCroCD

oroCDoroQ.COcnc.c75CD

J5CD

^_

B73TO

c0

cn"DCDO0Q.L_

,0

QO

•Sc0

1

sd t

o ca

lcul

ate

the

gro

un

dw

ate

r vo

laaw

n he

re:

r, /%

C

F3

l/F

- ' t

3 coc co2 ~75 oD Hcr co

I «O O

" sE sQ) T— <D

z

CDcoN

1-o

trroI

croLU

T3Cro•e0D.

CDcnroCD

t J

CM

Q.

COCDjQro

Bac

kgro

und

Doc

umen

t

"""

•/ ,a

vejV

5oil

Scr

eeni

ng G

uida

nce:

Tec

hnic

al

VJ

CDcno>

US

EP

A,

1

CN

\sse

ssm

en

t (F

oste

r W

he

ele

r, 2

00

0)

was

ap

pro

xim

ate

ly 2

5 a

cres

*,CO

cr

plem

enta

tpnn

t d

iscu

sse

d in

Sup

in s

ize.

(N

ote:

P

ossi

ble

build

ing

foo

acre

s

CNcoBto

iion

4.0

, M

ay 1

995,

EP

A 4

53/R

-94-

080A

C

alc

ula

ted

usi

ng

the

on f

ootp

rint

and

dis

solv

ed

vola

tile

con

cen

tra

tion

s in

gro

un

dw

ate

ri f

or W

orc

est

er,

MA

).

i—CD

"V_

aste

wat

eod

els

for

Wa

ste

and

WW

AT

ER

8 M

odel

, "A

ir E

mis

sion

s M

i

roincncn

0_LLJCO

co*

• —roroQxCDCD.£

75

2roCDsio

Q.

^3OCD

_C

cn

UCDCDQ.to

C

CDcnro

er t

he e

xca

vatio

n (A

vei

and

a "L

agoo

n" u

nit,

and

norm

aliz

inum

ptio

n E

quiv

alen

t to

10.

1 m

ph o

v

CD-oo

WA

TE

RS

toCOroo<;:

Site

-speci

^t

sed

in S

uppl

emen

tal

Ris

k A

sse

ssm

en

t (F

ost

er

Wh

ee

ler,

20

00

)

10o(O

cQ.73

cnc

5_oB

to coO CU

°- oo c£ •*Q. >»

umpt

ion

for

the

len

gth,

wid

th a

nd d

eum

ptio

n. E

quiv

alen

t to

app

roxi

mat

el

to toco toro ro0 0c: <^

Site

-spe

ciS

ite-s

peci

m CD

basc

o, 1

989.

F

inal

Rem

edia

l In

vest

iga

tion

Re

po

rt,

LU

CDjaro

75

CD_c

•o£

CO-

5CD

ge v

eloc

ity c

alcu

latio

ns p

rese

nted

in

COO.CDCDCO

oT30)toCO

CO

Is-

E

o75^.73.CD

TO

ro

i

g75

O

CDCD

75

CDto1

o

•g

roo.0CD

|

|

O

•oCD

Dcotoro

CD

3—>

BCOCD0D.

Norw

ood

nim

um v

alue

.

ECD

Con

serv

a

CO

nont

hs i

n W

orc

est

er,

MA

).

L_ToCDEro

o•oCD

t ai

r te

mpe

ratu

res

(bas

cons

ider

atio

n of

gro

und

and a

mbi

en

cCD3ro>"coo

(3)

6roCDoCO

CD^

for

the

cons

truc

tion

woi

oten

tial

grou

ndw

ater

exp

osur

e tim

e

Q.

ocCDCD

ET

Page 20: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

<J<

ed U

sing

the

WA

TER

S M

odel

in

o>JD(0

_ro

oto0COstoir

Em

issi

on

-o

orm

aliz

e

•oun

dwat

e

(9

E

0•

k_n>

roun

dwat

O

E

CD

xpos

ure

LU

0CO

uper

fund

COCOo0.•o00

o-z.

3CO

o § w »-<D 2 0 0)

* o E «CO £0 0> >

lisl =^ CO — w _Jo > 13 0 -3,*^ CO — t""

^ x ^ -C z *~-c HI — ** CO* > 3i.O CO Q> •— ' ~)™C

w £ > c £W T 0 0 J2

E o w ** o>_. «> co ;-;

U CO — i-o> o •£m i - C= < 0) 0)C .C OCO 0) *- co £ "o o

O CO•4-»

co F c:S * O c

£ 0--= 2< 0 w 5:5-

n •£ o UJ ' 'LT £ ,x, <U- o LU

"S c E Sft ft ^ -^

115 •— ^ oo • -jr-"5 (/> — « — •O f- >tf , >,— t *i r—

o m a:

cc a. .2c o -s— t ^ TO w ^ ^— ' ^ t ^ 1

E d) <-. co =ii- C £ O)

S ££ ^ "oo

k.Q)^3

21o z

3o•oCON

I "51_ ~0 «

o s

o •— •E §•5 20 O

oopLLJ

,

a>lo)pUJ

0 CN

0oinCN

CD

9LUooCM

CNCMoCD

U"5o

h-

0

co

,1,2

-Tric

hlor

oe

T~

oo

ooinCM

Tj

pLLJT—

CO

CM

0O)mo

To2

0/1\

,2-D

ichl

oroe

the

'r~

oo

oLUO)CO

osCN

CD

9UJ00CD

Tf

0

f^.oo>co0

hlor

oben

zene

0

oO

'

1 '

COoLUOT-

o

CM

^-OLU

CO

csi

CMO)incoin

0c

1

_o

5CM

'o

OO

oooUJ0T-

00 CO CO O) CO O5 CD 'O O O O O 0 O

L U L U L U L U L U L U L U ^•«— lO jCN T— T— cn ot*-T- ^ ,- CD T- r- r-,

o0inCM

f-s.

0LU0)CO

1

0 0o oin m

0 o

-rr^_>^~

,

!

0 000o o o oin in m m

CM j C\[' CM CM CM

mpLLJCDCM

i^3-O

LUOCD

m i in CD9 9LU UJoo ^t•«— h~

p

CM

oinCN

CD CDO

LLJ LUCO 00CM T-

o

oinCN

o 0o oin 'inCM CM"

•"?'-->UJ >"^oo ^

1

o ^oCD

j-co

CN

CDC

etra

chlo

roet

he

H

oo

CD

inoCDCDin

0c0

£

2_oobCM

J)

CD

00

(v- CN

^''5^ CM

0 0

OO O)

O OO O

CD

OO)

T

"fr CM T-

Oin

richl

oroe

then

e

h-

O0

OO0CM

s05

0f—

0

inyl

Chl

orid

e

N

0

,2,4

-Tn

chlo

rob

00N

,2-D

ichl

orob

en

> - T-

0

O

OO

^ —COr-

s

^_ -^£~

I

S'-'»o ° P0- o o

1

O)

fv^

CD'S'CO

0c0Nl

,3-D

ichl

orob

en

0c0N

,4-D

ichl

orob

en

1 — T—

oO

0O

oO

•t —CNO)CD

COin

CDO)CMCMf-CDCM

CM

CM

oo2

OO-tCM

O

8

-, —O)CDf**»a>o

CM

oo0

CO0

> >i> CO CO CO CO.O.

CO0CL

COOCL

Q.X111

0Q.

CQ

CO

O

OCLn

COO0_

C/)

c^30Q.EoOocCOo>60—roo

E0

COII CO

0 o[y> <w ?c -2D COO 0CL 3E 76o >039 Q-c cco ',_O) o

Oo s® x -.1=0O CD> Q.

~0

toCoo

S0~COo

=CDCO(0Co0t±b

CLLUQ

20*J

00E0

~

^>XO0.c• *

x CO| CO

O "JD

2 ^I O ^

2 g to^ m O

" < 1 i -o^ 1 5 °|^<^ ^ i?Q , j p , , ,

-r T- CM CO, , .•**. ~7

0)O)ro0.

Page 21: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

6.0 TOXICOLOGICAL PARAMETERS

The COPCs identified for the groundwater include both carcinogens and non-carcinogens. Theto.xicological response for dermal absorption of carcinogens is expressed in terms of a cancer slope factor(CSF). while the lexicological response for dermal absorption of non-carcinogens is expressed in termsof a reference dose (RfD). Likewise, the toxicological response for inhalation of carcinogens isexpressed in terms of a unit risk (UR), while the toxicological response for inhalation of non-carcinogensis expressed in terms of a reference concentration (RfC).

The non-carcinogenic toxicological factors are based on the assumption that there is a level of chemicaldose or intake below which no adverse health effects would be expected. RfDs and RfCs that areassociated with threshold effects provide the estimate of the daily dose of a chemical to which anindividual may be exposed without an appreciable risk of adverse health effects, including organ damageor reproductive effects. The chronic RfD and RfC are derived from either an available No ObservableAdverse Effects Level (NOAEL) or the Lowest Observable Adverse Effects Level (LOAEL).Uncertainty and modifying factors are applied to the NOAEL and LOAEL to account for interspeciesdifferences, the duration of the critical study, protection of sensitive subpopulations, and any additionaluncertainties associated with the principal study on which the toxicological factor was based.

The carcinogenic toxicological factors reflect the relative probability that the incidence of cancer wouldincrease in target populations exposed to that chemical. USEPA uses a system for classifying chemicalsaccording to their likelihood as a human carcinogen. This system is based on five "weight-of-evidence"categories that are used to classify each compound. The weight-of-evidence classification system issummarized below.

Group Classification

A This category indicates there is sufficient evidence from epidemiological studies to support acausal association between an agent and human cancer.

Bl This category generally indicates there is at least limited evidence from epidemiological studiesof carcinogenicity to humans.

B2 This category generally indicates, in the absence of data on humans, there is sufficient evidenceof carcinogenicity in animals.

C This category indicates that there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals in the absenceof data on humans.

D This category indicates that the evidence for carcinogenicity in animals is inadequate, or no dataare available.

E This category indicates that there is evidence of non-carcinogenicity in at least two adequateanimal tests in different species or in both epidemiologic and animal studies.

All COPCs with a weight-of-evidence carcinogenicity classification of A, B, or C were evaluated ascarcinogens in the analysis. The toxicological parameters for the identified COPCs are presented inTables 6-1 through 6-4 as appropriate. These values were taken from the Integrated Risk InformationSystem (IRIS) (USEPA, 2002) or the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)(USEPA, 1997) if a value was not available from IRIS. In addition, further toxicological information forPCBs was taken from guidance published by the National Center for Environmental Assessment(NCEA).

For the purposes of evaluating potential dermal exposures, the oral RfD and CSF values will be modifiedby the Oral-to-Dermal Adjustment Factors obtained from RAGS Part E (USEPA, 2001). Chronictoxicological factors were applied to this scenario since they are considered to be conservative withrespect to the subchronic exposures (2 weeks to 7 years) that were assumed to be associated with thisconstruction scenario.

TD02 0 4 2 A ]5/2-l'02

Page 22: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

OQ

^j CO

or CD

CDQ

Oo

>- 0)-C ±±H O co

Con

fiden

ceLe

vel

Un

cert

ain

ty/

Mo

dify

ing

Fac

tors

Tes

tA

mm

al(

s)T

arge

t O

rgan

/C

ritic

al

Effe

ct

oQ.

TJ3

co

^/> Q

-1 o£ EQ .*

Sou

rce

Chro

nic

Der

mal

RfD

mg/

kg-d

ay [

2]

E t:^ o ^

O S2 ra** ~ LL

1S

Chro

nic

Ora

l R

fDm

g/kg

-day

o_Q

O Z

Oil

or H

azar

dous

Mat

eria

lC

hem

ical

Gro

up [1]

Med

ium

Med

ium

o oo oO 0

CD CDt/) m:D rjo o5 5

E Eo ^

Drin

king

Wat

er S

tudy

Drin

king

Wa

ter S

tudy

£ S

CO CO

or or

Med

ium

N/A

E E E E=> 9 <; u 3T5 "O -, TD "OCD CD ^- CD CD

0 0 0O OjOo o oT- ro *-

8$CDIO

O

5

Live

rB

lood

Live

r W

eigh

t Gai

n

•o

COCD

cooQ.X

LU

"ra6

CDcnroro0

CM l~-O cn

CDO)rara

C>

CMO

S

, I

COa:

i

COoLUO

CMOLUO

5s S?o oo o

COoLUO.<)•

CM0

LUO

om ojo m0 0C7> ^ti- in

1 1

2-T

nchl

oroe

than

e

O

l,2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e(t

ota

l)[4

]

oo

CMCD

LU0CM

1-co

tflI

CMO

LU0

0s 5s

0 OO 0

CM0

LU0CM

CO

or

s < < 5O ^ ^ "O

o o oo < o o o0 g o 0 0 z

CD

13 -c ra ro ro -io z or o: or z

Pla

sma

Drin

king

Wat

er S

tudy

< CD

Z

Chr

onic

Fee

ding

Stu

dy

CM CM CM0 0 0

CO

or

CM CM9 9UJ LU0 0T- CM

OO

CMO

LU0

1089

0715

6592

Chl

orob

enze

ne

oO

cis-

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

uO

c•g

Rep

rodu

ctiv

e S

tudy

CMO

colco coor or o:

[

<z

CO

LU0CO

o

CM CM9 9LU:LU

O OT- CM

1271

84T

etra

chlo

roet

hene

OO

inoCO

tran

s-1 ,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

OO

CMO

UJ0

<• o" 'o-5; o oZ O O

1

<D

OO>

Tnc

hlor

oeth

ene

oO

COO

LU0CO

I

Vin

yl C

hlor

ide

8

CMO

LU0

CM00OCM

1 2,

4-Tn

chlo

robe

nzen

e

oO

CO

co

roroO

CMO

5

coor

z

z

CMos

COor

CM

9LUOcn

oo

CMoLU

CT>

Oinmcn

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oben

zene

O0

z

z

1CO

X

1 ,3

-Dic

hlor

oben

zene

OO

z

z

1

z

CM§CM

CO

or

1

z

1

CD

1

1 ,4

-Dic

hlor

oben

zene

OOCO

ooCO

CD

co•£

Eye

, K

erat

inIm

mun

e S

yste

mIm

mun

olog

ic S

tudy

3/28

/02

COor

2 O

E-0

5

1

moLUOCM

5346

9219

CM

moQ.

1 1•5 -6CD CD2 5

8CO

o0CO

CD c?

C ' c=0 0

Eye

, K

erat

in,

Imm

une

Sys

tem

Imm

unol

ogic

Stu

dy3/

28/0

2

CO

2 O

E-0

5

8

2 O

E-0

512

6722

96A

rocl

or-

1248[5

]

CD

0.

Eye

Ker

atin

Imm

une

Sys

tem

Imm

unol

ogic

Stu

dy3/

28/0

2

CO

or

inoLUoCM

S?O0

2 O

E-0

511

0976

91A

rocl

or-1

254

moCL

tom

A =

Not

Ava

Z

E-CD

*w>scocgro

J5_c^</>or-oS

cnSjrn

coor

CD-QCOh-

CO

ECO

HCD

toIACDint/t<tot5£LUSL

"coCDIIIh-CO

I

emiv

olat

lle O

rgan

ic C

ompo

unds

P

CB

= P

olyc

hlon

nate

d B

iphe

nyl

COitoo

CO-o

IQ.

0

CCO0)

OJ?roo

uOO

T".

alA

dju

stm

enlF

act

or

E

5

vTO

a

I

E

1II

i

1r-T

0)c.o

ICO

CO

or

Sto•D

CO*CD3ra

I Fo

r IR

IS v

,

CO

f HE

AS

T

oSCO•oto"CD3CO>

1—

For

HE

AS

"

LUOz

9-a

oQ.CO

s

the

publ

i

15S(D•D

«<DZJ

CD>

For

NC

EA

Sa>§w

ro

0)y>3e-

brm

atio

i

c

colo

gica

lhl

oroe

then

e to

xi

o

CM

COo

2

urro

gate

bas

ed o

n r

ecen

t di

scus

sion

s w

ith U

SE

PA

Reg

ion

I R

isk

Ass

esso

l

w10ro•DCDin3

S

info

rmat

i54

toxi

colo

glca

l

CM

J>

S

Page 23: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

>• o>C C «

re £, o

|1 "

v>

i1'c tj

ra orat

~ "reQ) OO) k_ —re .hl_ (j

o>oc _01 0)

c «oO

0

^^h-

•o

to

« sJJ -o£ 1=" m

^

CO

3Oto

U

o »—— c «og o E£ re gO re 3

•§

1

< §O Z

"re<5

il or

Haz

ardo

us M

ai

O

"5 "o •—

1 =• 0

0 O

Q

< < § < < <z z 0 z z z

< < raz z cc Z Z Zi

>•C I

Z Z ,_ z z zCUs

< < <z z z

<

t_.

< < <z z'z

c

1

z z

CU

c < <

c z z<z

° 'CO.c—

1

S SJ&"

toce

CO h-

CMo

CM

CM

,_

to to to

<t <(z z

in

§>r~-

1,2-

Tnch

loro

etha

ne

X

ll"*]co

1

to

<-z

0 O _o o o <co o ,o|z

-S CD

_Q C

< 75 ™ 5 ra <z Ij; Lt: 2 Q; z

75 °>L? °

-n

z

__ i o

> > 0)— 1 — 1 "O

5

<!.

Z

E< 2Z Q>

^

< < <z z z

>JTD

<Z

toO) C Cc o ' of 7S0) COLU r-

Oi —

7n03f~

<Z

t

O

CM CM

S ooCM CMCM CO

I

, II

CO CO 5j5 P; -*

1 H-CO CO

a:1

1

^_ '

+ <t <t j <!LUoCM

§5m0

in

i"

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e (to

1-" T-"

oo

OO

O>00o

Z Z'Z

CMO)

in

hlor

oben

zene

o

8

s-1 ,

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

0

8

ir-CM

stra

chlo

roet

hene

H

oo

inoCO

*—

CDC

ans-

1 ,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

e

^

a:CO CO

Hco<LU

COcc

x xi

CM

<t

Zi,—

CD

g

•ichl

oroe

then

e

i-

O O0,0

oin

inyl

Chlo

ride

>

o

CMo

LUoCM

CMOOOCM

(D

S

15x:o

Hp

CM"T-"

8

CNO

LUo zCM '

T- COO h^ininO)

loro

benz

ene

QCM*-"

o

to

5in

loro

benz

ene

QCO

T-"

OO

to

§1

(2 Z

w

| 1

E

•60)

^

<z

-^

COCD

3 Z

1Q.CUtr

CM

§

CM

CM0

COCM

CO CO

to toQL OC.

CMoLUoCO

Z

h~ CMCD C7>^f (DCD -*O 'COT- m

loro

benz

ene

oQ

•4T-"

8CO

CM

CM

B•Q

<

COOQ.

Z Z

Z Z

z z

< <z z

11

< <z z

1

CMoCOCM

CO

CMOCOCMCO

to to£ K

z

10O)CMCM

CDCM

Z

o>COr-o>oT—

1

COTfCM

O

E<

moCL

so8<

mO0-

oCLIImOCL

oQ.

O

cCO

y EtO Q)a to

£.0

™ 5 T3

P I W S.t E . -gS 3 <n S:„ W -D CO

^1 B SI l l s2 So w

E « y K

^ *t S a,

Ul -5? U' S 3£ J2 rara o >

» » > co: ^ " s=

LUO

CO

H!to -°

ra•o

n " tg < Y IL<§S5_^.

to << LULU OX Zo o

c^ £

Page 24: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oro "roCD E

CD

Q> ro

5 "ro UJro jr i±t- O CO

ro

c

ino>H<DQ.

>-

OEl-

o S

»l> >> UJ

8.1-

133

^ — ' Q>2 £

Q >

o>

gCO

i- CM

S o —

all!l|» w|

"raE C

* £ 0

r> « -v ^ ro" •=. u.

O

>- X "><s> 2. n2 U -D

Hi2 o E0 55 ^

o>n

0 Z

"5<D

Hazard

ous M

ai

0

O

"5 T^

o •— •E §•» 0

0 O

CD

o

CD

^

a

CDU)CO

roO

CMO

^

CO

rr

CMO

LLJ

in

S?oo

CM0

jj

in

ino0o>

Tnc

hlor

oeth

ane

CM

8

z

z

?

<rz

CMg

INro

CO

a:

z

z

z

8mo

reO)) 8U

3U)9O

JO|lp

OCM

8

z

ffz

Q

<,-Z

CMg

CNro

COtr

Z

z

z

§ono

oben

zene

6

OO

z

„.z

D

4Z

CMg

CMCO

CO

IT

Z

Z

Z

CMO>intoin

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

in0

OO

Z

4z

?

4Z

CM0

5

COo;

Z

,<

r

Sr~-CM

:hlo

roet

hene

1h-

oo

z

z

7

<[•z

CMg

CMro

COce

z

z

z

in0CO<nIT)

CDr-

1 ,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

e

encS

oo

z

z

?

<z

CMg

CMCO

CO

a:

z

z-

z

CD

0

S

oroe

then

e

|

oo

rotr

CD-

<

t .01

O

mO

CMg

CMro

COOL

ou!)CN

Oo"

UJCM

"~"

0in

Chlo

ride

[4]

->,

OO

z

z

Q

<

Z

CMg

CMro

CO

cz.

z

z

z

CMCOOCM

Tnch

loro

benz

en<

-*CM"

0OCO

z

„.z

Q

4

Z

CMoJf

CO

rr

z

z

z

oinin05

chlo

robe

nzen

e

9CM

OO

CO

z

z

D

4

Z

CMOTf

CO

o:

z

z

z

tor-

S

chlo

robe

nzen

e

9CO

OO

CO

z

<z

o

<z

SiCO

1-coIIIT

9UJ

CM

S?0o

CM9UJ

CM

CD

<no

1

o

D4

o

CO

z

<z

CMm

<z

£5>

In,!•UJu

2.0

E+00

s?oo

o

UJ0CM

CD

CM

$

CM

cShi.

|

CDOQ.

Z

<7.

CMCD

<

Z

£05

!nf(UJU

2.0E

+00

s?oo

8UJoCN

<P

S

S

CO

1

CO

8

z

<z

CMm

<z

8i

IrTf(UJu

8UJoCM

s?I

ooUJ0CM

^O)CD

S

CMT—

1

|

COoQ.

CL

O

0<fQ-UJ

cCDO)OC0

3croEX

<f

OJ

ro

T>c

D

E

JZ

Q>

3T)C

C

rcm

og

e

roocroEf-

roba

ble

D_

T_CD

indic

ate

s su

ffic

ien

t evi

dence

in

an

ima

l'

cCDCDOcoroocroE

_c

robable

Q_

CMCD

hu

ma

ns

c

gcCD-g

CDoco3To3crd)•aroc

0)O)Oco

3cro£szCD-QCO<no

Q_

O

.rcm

ogen

3

hum

an

ro00roCDJDro

inroo'oZ

Q

(_)

C0)

81CO

3coc

l»_oCDOCCD

T5>

UJ

UJ

Page 25: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

£V)T3

toreEc

to

CDQ.

y-oEH

*- ffl

° O•£ c•t- m.?•§5 UJ

Q.

l 1

-g*3

CO

» S-1 0)3 S

R

or3 "

O .E

ffl ^C"

c •—•

h.CD

O Z

To

il or

Haz

ardo

us M

ater

o

™;rI %« 0

0 O

to ! ^ ' — ^- ^r *f13O z z z z z z rr z z z z z

| < < <— S S" S

O

(1)(Jro

z

< < < 3; < <z z z s, z z

oo|

*t *tm'Z Z

<z

*t <c *t

z z

<;<<<'<Z

z

<J

<

RCD

Z'Z Z Z TD

Q

<(

Q Q

4zlz

0 • •£

CNO

toor

CM CM CMO O O

CMICMjCM

col ro co

I

COen

!CO

or

. i

CM

5

Z z Z Z

1CMCO

<f *iz z z

CMCO

<t

Z

I

CM0

CM

CO

CM0

CMCO

CO CO CO CO

CMO

OOCM

CO

CO

CNO

JN

CO

COo; o; cc i cc or ct

CMO

3 1

CMCO

<l

z

CM

ICM

CO

CO

orCO

COg>

3)

5-CO ' ff

or1 a: LUoz

to2?

S>

^

LUI J7i

in CD

^ < < < <,-•'

! 1 1

m0o

1 ,2

-Tric

hlor

oeth

ane

*-

oenmo3,

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e (t

otal

T-

O 0o o

t^SCO0

hlor

oben

zene

(_>

CM0)in<x>in

s-1

,2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

O

o oO O> >

<

COIOoIDr^- to

CM in

etra

chlo

roet

hene

i-

oo

ans-

1 ,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

<2^- ^t

CO

"

^t

§ oin

h- h-

richl

oroe

then

e FTCD•g

6>,c

z z zI

CMCOoCM'I~

2,4-

Tric

hlor

oben

zene

j= i— '> T-

oo

oO

OO

o0

ou>incn

2-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

T-

c_>ow

COf-

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

•«-

o

I

S35

5:

UJt i7

<o o i cpLLJ LLJ LLJ

,-' r-' W

l

to

°

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

*-

ooCO

CMO)IO

COin

CM

£

<.

moQ.

|

COcnCMCM

toCM

j —O)toh-0)o

COTtCM

*—

O0Q<1

COo0.

CM

0

8<t

COo0.

Q.

O

t5CLLU

CIDO)OCO

Hum

an c

ar

i<

dica

tes

that

lim

ited

hum

an d

ata

are

avai

labl

e

c

rcm

ogen

-

3roE_d

- Pro

babl

e 1

,_

CD

dica

tes

suffi

cien

t evi

denc

e in

ani

mal

s an

d

c

rcm

ogen

-

3CTO£Z

_C

- P

roba

ble

1

CNCD

uman

s

.c

vide

nce

in

Oco5J

crIDT3IDc

cCD

8'o

3cCD

E

Pos

sibl

e hi

•o

cIDD)OC

O

3cID

CD

toCD

ID-OCOC

COCOroo

o

iQ

noge

nici

ty

0

1oc

Evi

denc

e o

iUJ

Page 26: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

7.0 HUMAN HEALTH RISK CHARACTERIZATION

The assumptions and factors compiled above relating to the exposure point concentrations, exposureparameters, and toxicological factors were combined to estimate the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR)and the screening hazard index (111) for the potential adult construction worker for the carcinogenic andnon-carcinogenic COPCs, respectively. The ELCR was compared to a target carcinogenic risk goal ofone-in-one hundred thousand ( I x l O 5 ) (i.e., the MCP Cumulat ive Receptor Cancer Risk Limit). Thescreening HI (an HI that does not distinguish between the primary target organs or systems of theCOPCs) was compared to a target non-carcinogenic hazard index goal of 1.0 (i.e., the MCP CumulativeReceptor Non-Cancer Risk Limit). If the screening III exceeded 1.0, separate His were calculated forCOPCs \\ith similar toxic effects and mechanisms of action, and each of these His was compared to anHI of 1.0. The results of the risk evaluations are presented in Table 7-1 and are discussed below. Thespreadsheet reports supporting these calculations are presented in Appendix B.

The results of this analysis for the potential future construction worker scenario indicates a totalprojected ELCR of 1 .4xl0 5 and a total projected screening HI of 27. The projected ELCR slightlyexceeds the MCP Cumulative Receptor Cancer Risk Limit and the projected screening HI exceeds theMCP Cumulative Receptor Non-Cancer Risk Limit. Consequently, separate His were calculated for eachtarget organ identified in Tables 6-1 and 6-2. The only individual HI that exceeded the MCP CumulativeReceptor Non-Cancer Risk Limit was the one for eye, keratin, and immune system which had anHI of 27. These exceedances can be attributed to the 3 Aroclors (PCBs) detected in the groundwater.

TD02-W2 7.15/24,02

Page 27: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

» 5a: c3Q

iS ?

1

IS

I I

§ 0 C

8 S

H l M l i i i l l l

3 o

- - O G £ : » - > — *- — — <<<

o o o u u o o u o o o o m m t Do o o o o o o o > > > > o o o

> > > > > > > O ] i / ) t / l i / ) l i a Q .

o o o S

>n -« o n

— " — ' ^ —' < < <

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 § § § § S

P i n

Page 28: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

8.0 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

The analysis associated w i th this Amendment to the Supplemental Risk Assessment imohes a number ofinherent uncertainties and assumptions How these uncertainties \\ere addressed has resulted in acorresponding increase or decrease in the level of conservatism associated w i t h the analysis and theresults This section highlights and individually discusses the most significant of these uncertaintiesFhe principal uncertainties are discussed below by topic

8.1 Selection of Chemicals of Potential Concern

The process used to select COPCs for the groundwater was designed to eliminate very few, if any,detected chemicals. This was, in part, due to adopting the MADEP's protocol of not incorporating atoxicity screen as a component of the COPC selection process Most often, the toxicity screen is used asa supporting factor to eliminate constituents with low frequencies of detection Consequently, a numberof constituents with very low frequencies of detection were retained as COPCs for this analysis Fourretained COPCs had detection frequencies as low as 0 6% (1,1,2-Tnchloroethane and Tetrachloroethene)and 1 2% (Chlorobenzene and 1,3-Dichlorobenzene) Hie minimum frequency of detection often usedby USEPA is 5% (assuming no indicated "hot spot" source areas) Table 7-1 clearly shows that theprimary contributors to the hazard index (and to a lesser extent the cumulative carcinogenic nsk)projections that exceed their respective target levels are the three Aroclors (1242, 1248, and 1254).Aroclors 1242, 1248, and 1254 were detected in 1.2%, 11 0%, and 35 5% of the groundwater samplesduring these monitoring rounds, respectively. The consequence of this COPC selection approach is thatall of the retained COPCs are assumed to be present and effectively co-located for purposes of estimatingexposure. The impact is that nsk projections based on this assumption would be expected to overstatethe magnitude of actual exposures

A comparison of the maximum groundwater concentrations measured for the COPCs selected for theSHHRA and this Amendment is presented in Table 8-1 The list of COPCs is seen to be very consistentTetrachloroethene, Trichloroethene, and 1,4-Dichlorobenze are seen to have decreased in their maximumdetected concentration since the SHHRA, while a number of compounds with two chlorine atoms andvinyl chloride (with one chlorine atom) increased somewhat This pattern of change is consistent withnatural degradation of the higher chlorinated compounds The resulting chlorinated compounds in thegroundwater were not, however, indicated to represent a health risk to the construction worker via theexposure routes analyzed

8.2 Selection of Exposure Point Concentrations

The maximum detected concentrations of the retained COPCs were adopted as the exposure pointconcentrations (EPCs) for this analysis. This approach was proposed and accepted as an alternative tothe computational intensive approach that requires further preparing the data set for statistical analysis,evaluating and testing the form of the data distribution for each COPC, and then calculating a 95% upperconfidence level (UCL) groundwater concentration for each COPC. Many times this process results incalculated 95% UCLs that exceed the maximum detected concentration. In these situations, standardprocedure calls for adopting the maximum detected concentration as the EPC. It was judged that theconservative approach of adopting the maximum detected concentrations directly would serve toadequately highlight potential exposure routes and COPCs of most concern. A comparison of the ratio ofthe maximum detected concentrations of the Aroclors to their mean concentrations reveals values of 54,38, and 31 for Aroclors 1242, 1248, and 1254, respectively As such, use of the maximum detectedconcentrations of the COPCs as the EPCs would be expected to overstate actual exposure conditions.This is especially true when this assumption is combined with the COPC selection process discussedabove which effectively assumes all the retained COPCs are present at their maximum observed levelsand co-located at the same point of exposure.

TD02 042 o i52402 8-]

Page 29: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Table 8-1Comparison of the Maximum Groundwater Concentrations Used in the SHHRA and this AnalysisSite: Norwood PCB Superfund Site

ChemicalGroup [1]

vocvocvocvocvocvocvocvocsvocsvocsvocsvocsvoc

Oil or Hazardous Material

1 ,1 ,2-Tnchloroethane1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total)Chlorobenzenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTetrachloroethenetrans-1 ,2-DichloroetheneTrichloroetheneVinyl Chloride1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene

T^S-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DtchlorobenzenePentachlorophenol

Maximum DetectedGroundwater

Concentration for thePeriod 3/98 to 7/99 [2]

[ug/L]

Not a COPC1,700110

1,70052100

7,40074

1,400161018088

Maximum DetectedGroundwater

Concentration for thePeriod 10/00 to 9/01 [3]

[ug/L]

222,700140

2,4003

1904,700120970211849

Not a COPC

Change

-59%27%41%-94%90%-36%62%-31%31%80%-73%

-

Notes:[1] VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds, SVOC = Semivolatile Organic Compounds,

PCB = Polychlonnated Biphenyl[2] Groundwater data set used in the SHHRA[3] Groundwater data set used in this Amendment to the SHHRA

TD02 0425/24/02 Page 1 of 1 Degradation xls, Table81

Page 30: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

8.3 Toxicological Factors

The three most significant points relative to the toxicological factors used in this assessment pertain tothe use of chronic reference doses (RiDs) for the construction worker exposures (instead of subchronicreference doses), the use of the toxicological factors for Aroclor 1254 for all three detected Aroclors, andthe specific choice ol which cancer slope factor to apply for the Aroclor compounds As noted in Section6, the RfD is the estimate of the daily intake of a constituent over a lifetime that is not likely to result inany adverse health effects (including sensitive subpopulations) tor exposure durations greater than2 weeks and less than 7 years, subchronic toxicological dose-response parameters could be used, whenavailable These subchronic toxicological parameters (typically reference doses) are tailored toexposures of shorter duration, as contrasted to the continuous exposures for longer periods (e g , 25 to30 years) that form the basis of the chronic toxicological parameters Subchronic reference doses areavailable for only a handful of the COPCs addressed in this analysis In general, the publishedsubchronic reference dose is the same or is somewhat higher (up to an order of magnitude) than thecorresponding chronic reference dose for a particular constituent Use of the few available publishedsubchronic reference doses would have lowered the projected hazard indices very little

The second issue was the use of the Aroclor 1254 toxicological parameters as surrogates for thetoxicological parameters for Aroclors 1242 and 1248 This approach was adopted based on recentdiscussions with USEPA Region 1 risk assessors for other sites The approach is judged to beconservative but defensible for this analysis given the uncertainties, since the Aroclors were associatedwith essentially all of the projected risk

The third issue was the choice of an appropriate cancer slope factor for the Aroclor compounds USEPAguidance (USEPA, 1996b) recommends that the cancer slope factor be selected in consideration of thenature of the potential exposure pathway and how the associated environmental processes would tend toeither increase or decrease risk potential Dermal exposure to PCBs may fall under either the "High Riskand Persistence" or the "Low Risk and Persistence" categories, where each category has its ownrecommended upper bound cancer slope factor (i e , 2 0 and 0 4 (mg/kg-day) ', respectively) The moreconservative value of 2 0 (mg/kg-day)' was used in this analysis Alternatively, choosing a cancer slopefactor of 0 4 (mg/kg-day)1 for the Aroclor compounds \vould effectively reduce the total projectedcarcinogenic risk for the construction worker by a factor of five, bringing the total to below the target riskgoal of 1x105

8.4 Exposure Scenario

The construction worker was assumed to be exposed to pooled groundwater in an excavation area viaboth dermal absorption and the inhalation of volatiles released off the free surface of the water into thebreathing space Reasonable maximum exposure (RME) parameters were identified given this baselineassumption There is uncertainty as to whether a construction worker would actually work in a mannerthat his/her feet and hands would remain wet as the result of contact with pooled or infiltratinggroundwater for any prolonged period of time day after day Considerations of safety or comforttypically lead to the dewatenng of work areas and the wearing of suitable boots and gloves to keep theworker dry Consequently, the scenano evaluated is considered to be a very conservative one, especiallyrelative to the direct contact dermal absorption of contaminants As the dermal absorption of the Aroclorcompounds dominated the projected hazard indices, this assumption is significant. It is anticipated thatdermal absorption would typically be much less than projected Table 7-1 indicates that preventing skincontact with the groundwater (e g, through the wearing of watertight boots and gloves and possibly aTyvek oversuit) would effectively eliminate exposure.

TD02 042 0 15 24 02

Page 31: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

8.5 Volatilization Estimates

USEPA's WATERS model was used to estimate the rate of release of the volatile COPCs from a standingpool of groundwater. The "Lagoon" option was used to simulate conditions that may be associated \\itha shallow pool of standing groundwater. While there is some uncertainty in modeling the physicalscenario in this way, the contribution of the air inhalation route was so small that the uncertaintiesassociated with the model inputs (e.g., flow rates, pool dimensions, wind speed) are not indicated to havean effect on the overall level of projected risk.

TD02-O42 OA5/24 02

Page 32: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

9.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the analysis indicated that the calculated ha/ard index exceeded the MADLP target level(i e , 27 vs 1) and the calculated carcinogenic risk slightly exceeded the MADEP target level(i e , 1 4x10 s vs 1 0x105) These projected results for a hypothetical future construction workerexposed to the site groundwater are based on an assumption of repetitive dermal and inhalation exposureover the course of a construction effort that may be associated wi th a new commercial building Theelevated risk and hazard index results relative to the MADLP target levels are essentially all the result ofthe detected Aroclor compounds in the groundwater and the potential direct contact exposure route(i e , absorbing PCBs through the skin)

The exposure parameters associated with the duration and manner of exposure that were assumed for thisanalysis are believed to be conservative and consistent with the concept of "reasonable maximumexposure" It should be noted that the analysis takes no mit igat ive credit for the prevention of dermalcontact with the groundwater by usual worker attire (e g , steel toed boots, work gloves, overalls, etc.)The analysis also is believed to be conservative relative to the selection of the COPCs, the exposure pointconcentrations assumed, and the choice of the lexicological factors applied (as discussed in Section 8)As such, actual groundwater contaminant exposures to a typical construction worker would very likely beappreciably less that what are projected here.

Because the dermal absorption of COPCs through direct contact was seen to dominate the potentialexposures, it is recommended that any future construction activity include the following provisions

• Dewatenng excavations if standing water may persist in areas where workers may come intoincidental contact with it; and

• Require the use of watertight boots, gloves, and overalls (e g , a Tyvek suit) whenever workmust be performed in an area where pooled groundwater is present.

TD02 042 O i5'24 02

Page 33: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

10.0 REFERENCES

Ebasco, 1989 Final Remedial Imestigation Report, Norwood PCB Site June

Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation (Foster Wheeler), 2000a. Final Supplemental RiskAssessment, Norwood PCB Superfund Site, Norwood, Massachusetts. April.

Foster Wheeler, 2000b. Nineteenth Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Norwood PCBSuperfund Site, Norwood, Massachusetts. October 2000 Sampling Event

Foster Wheeler, 2001 a. Twentieth Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Norwood PCB SuperfundSite, Norwood, Massachusetts. January 2001 Sampling Event

Foster Wheeler, 2001b. Twenty-First Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Norwood PCBSuperfund Site, Norwood, Massachusetts. April 2001 Sampling Event.

Foster Wheeler and Nobis Engineering, Inc. (Nobis), 2001. Twenty-Second Quarterly GroundwaterMonitoring Report, Norwood PCB Superfund Site, Norwood Massachusetts. August 2001Sampling Event.

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA), 1998. Groundwater Risk Assessment, Norwood PCB SuperfundSite, Norwood, Massachusetts. August

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP), 1995. Guidance for Disposal SiteRisk Characterization in Support of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. Bureau of Waste SiteCleanup and Office of Research and Standards. July.

US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1995. Air Emissions Models for Waste andWastewater. WATERS Version 4 0 EPA 453/R-94-080A May 1.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1996a. Soil Screening Guidance. TechnicalBackground Document. EPA/540/R95/128. May.

U S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1996b. PCBs: Cancer Dose Response Assessment andApplication to Environmental Mixtures EPA 600/P-96/001F. September.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1997. Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables(HEAST). EPA 540/R-97-036. July.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2001. Risk Assessment Guidance for SuperfundVolume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal RiskAssessment) Interim. EPA/540/R/99/005. September.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)online database, www epa gov/iris accessed in March 2002.

TD02-W2 |Q_]5/24 02

Page 34: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

APPENDIX A

Summary of Groundwater Monitoring ResultsQuarterly Groundwater Monitoring Rounds 19 - 22

Norwood PCB Superfund Site

TD02-0425'24 02

Page 35: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

§ ?t ,

V)

oo

ro —Q 5

re O50roO

LU

gZ

*-

LLJN-

gZ

O

gLUN-gZ

CD

CQ 2I — -1

g Q,z

cr>COt^_gZ

-*op

gz

LTen

^ CCL

Z

CO

CQ

rjz

o

CDJs^_

g

aO [2 "CD

rr S *O

m

g

CM

CD

gO

AN

ALY

TE

3

"*

ID*}to

-,

CO

_,-QT

r^

CM

CO*-

"raCO

Z)

o

Z)

o

.aCO

enun

CM

0Oo0

CM

CM

0>

0_cO

c>

o

Z>,t"O

CDin

Z)

o

_,o

ID

CM

Z)

O

=3

O

Z>

o

z

ooooin

oo0oCM

Oo

0)cOlr~

2-D

ichl

oroe

tl

toc:ra

in

cT-

OoCM

-?

ccm

"N

"O

CDin

ID

o

Z)

o

CO

inC:

z

z

z

TO0

iloro

ethe

ne(l

oQCM

••-

Q

OCO

~*

^0oo•*~

CT3

oo*—

—)LO

LO

CM

CO

LP

Z)

O

Z)

o

CO

Z

ooo0in

oooo

o

Q)C

Dic

hlor

oeth

e

CM

c/)O

O

re

0CMCO

CC

OCO

—5

CO

CO

oCM

-o

2

ID

O

Z)o

•oCMCO

in

ooooCM

OOCO

in

0)cCD£0)O

J3

o

1—

=>

Z)

CO

ID

CO

3o

-,o

Z)

CM

Z)

o

=>o

Z)

o

z

oooom

ooooCM

in

0)

•ichl

oroe

than

i-CM,-

^-

^

r^

-,

CO

3o

Z)

o

Z)

CM

ID

O

Z)

o

T)CMCM

m

o0oin

ooo

m

cCD.n

oo

CD

"ah-

n

Z)

CO

-,

P;

)

O

_,O

TO

O

Z)

o

3o

^o

"

z

0om

o0o

oo

enze

ne

_QoQ

O

Z)

ID

CO

Z)

CO

3c

Z)

o

Z)

CM

Z)

o

Z)

o

Z)

o^

-z.

ooooCM

OCM

CM

CDCCOjr

Tet

rach

loro

e

CM

CMT-

••-

0

"o

oCMCO*—

OCOCO

CD

^

^

°

CO

en

CM

-D

{

COOO

'o1-

o ^

Q

_JB)3ctf)co-?ra

§coo

<

rrna:

"510o>

T3(jj

TO£

InLUII

—3

oSTS•oco

—y.

II

2-D

80).g0)>o-DracoCO

~E<L>OCoo•o£TO

LUII

LU

cO

"rocCDOeOCJ

CDCu

ECDW

T3

QIIO

clea

nup

leve

ls

QOrrT3cuCD(_)X1>£^5CO0)

CO_cCO

"t±

»-

O

xcee

ds

CD

CD:3

i•^

ra

±^b"•j

5

O

xcee

ds

OJ

0)Z3

ra

i_Q

On

g

xcee

ds

CD

01

"T;

n„

o>

1Q.Q,

n)

O•^r

\ |

z

COCMO CMCM SO CMQ C

Page 36: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

c

z^ ^ ci -.

o

O

$

a

H

CJ

o

CO

•°

COCDCD

CO

CD

ro»

SCDCD

CO

00en

CO

*"•

enen

r

QJ

O

"D

*

r j

ro0

ro0o0

Z-^

en

C

O)

C

k

o

C

O

C

o

CT

enCD

C

-si

C

o

C

»

Ui

C

--)=i

o

T>g

,,

-

=

o

Z-^

en

C

en

C

^o

C

o

^-

o

C

enCD

C

C

0

C

ien

C

H

5CJ f

o ,-J ,1

o ~

m o

m %

T

ei

8 §

en r~-

J

^ Z^

^n en

C C

en CD

C C

k ^

c o

C C

o o

C C

o o

C C

en enCD CD

C C

C C

J^0 0

C C

i i

en en

C C

H 0

o

0 '•-

o 0

o 5-

T

^

i J

rCO Co o0 O

ro a1

0 Oo o0 0o o

n 7

CO ^O O

CD Ci)

O --JO O

CL 2J

_^ en

o o

C C

ro 0_v

C

en coCD o

0

SJ

ro ^

" CD

CO "en o0) cj

^r j

orro60

3^o-^

c;

-

Z

z

J.

-^n

_^CD0

CDO

ro0)

o

^

o

C

JO0o

ro

0o

roIDo

en0

—i

> '

5

T

T

CO

OOCO

enoc0

z-^

en

C

o

C

1

o

o

C

o

C

0

CD

O

CD

0

C

CD

->

C

ean

r

r

.c.cc

r

CO

oCDCJ

c_

Co

CO

CDCJ

c_

ro

CDCJ

O

C

O

C

crCD

B)CJ

CDen

CDCJ

C—

O

c

a>0

CDCJ

zr"

—1r[

O

O

ro

iCO

O

2 3 o^ ^ ^

T5

1-jm

z

o r'c mT3 g

Z

^ m

1-vimS

z

^m§en

z

m

CO

z

m

z

^mo

z-*jkm

Oc

< cO SO B;

C"a.

cCQ

Page 37: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

0)t2 5o5 O IT

^ . ,

t . i/>(1> —

a 5 £C/) Q "

O -o ro O5 ? OIr

o

UJ

N-

03CO

LLJ

?

1

Q03CMT-

LJJ LUrmCM

^ LLJ

iCM

LU

•?

IQ03

UJS

CO

UJ2

Z

Q.

Q g a>O ro £o: J2 Jj

O

ro

5

CM

O

•7

0

AN

ALY

TE

Z)

-

-,

o

Z)

o

Z>

o

Z3

o

_QCO

CO

_OCO

O

CM

OOOO

CM

CM

nyl

Ch

lon

de

>

_,

-

z>o

Z>

o

Z)

o

Z)

o

UO

CM

Z)

inCM

•z.

oooom

o0ooCM

OO

"

0>c1 —

ins-

1 2

-Dic

hlo

roe

tt

it)

ID

0

Z>

O

Z)

o

Z)o

13

O

CO

roCO

£

Z

Z

^

~3"5

2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e(t

^

_,

<-

-, -,

O 0

) )

o o

o o

Z) Z)

o o^

TO O COCO

ro h--eg °°03

1

< u,

o oo o0 OO 0in CM

oO 0o oO roCM

s ^

c.

3-1

2-D

ichlo

roeth

e

ichl

oroe

then

e

0 H

_, _,

o o

_, _,

o o

ID 3

"- —

o'o

Z) Z>

o o

ID =)

LO LO

C\J CM

ID ZD

ID LD

C\J CN

II

^Z.

§ 8S uo

o „o ;=;§ §

1.0 m

CD

1 2

-Tn

chlo

roe

tha

n

jtrj

chlo

roe

the

ne

UJ

_,

-"

Z)

o

^3o

=

Z)

0

roin

1-m

<

oto

o

o

iloro

be

nze

ne

O

13

-

Z)

o

^3O

o

3o

z>

CM

z>

CM

<

0oooCM

OCM

CM

0)Cro-C

1 2

2-T

etr

ach

loro

e

,-

;

CD

O>

r—o

toOO

Is"oh-

<Q

O

CO

'o

gTOX)

OJ>CD

0) ir _ [2

_J)^c«gra-iCDl_>COo

<

;tim

ated

VI

III-oJ•gj

"O[;

o

II3

j_iCOcgra

£o

§-o-2

IILLJ

ro Q

S rr° "D

§ §0) XD.£ J503 3C/) tO

jU *~

3 Q)

O "roM _CQ oo

JJJ

b

Oj>~o

OJoX0)

OJD

ro>nro

i-j

bC\J

OCO130)oXooZ3

Oj>II

_Q

_CD

bn

E?

i

0oX0)0)13CD>IIo

Q)5

s"o,Q.

O~z.II<z:

COCMO (N

D ^

Page 38: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

HO

^J Q. CLJ^ n -/"

" c ^

mm

^ 5 -

OO

O

O

-1-.

•^

or

-t«.^-j

c-cn

°

enen

CD

-T)v-71o

^

o

^

-1

*^

T

1

*

J

NJOOoo

z

o(

o

c

c

C

CO

c

0

c

o

C

CO

C

CO

c

- H_, T~

0 il

iT ~"~"

^

^ °

^ ^

T

O n

-3 00 0C O

s\

° §

Z j,

0 0

c c

o o

C C

0 0

C C

cr co

C C

0) CD

C C

0 0

C C

^o CO

C C

CO CO

C C

^

-H—d^2

j

-

o0o

_r0o0

z

o

C

o

C

o

^

en

C

CO

C

0

C

CO

C2

CO

c

H"n

~

oEr^fr

-'

u.oo

rooo0o

n

COCO

.J

o

C

o

C

.COoCD

COoCO

r^

CD

oCOCT

00

CDCT

.-,j_j

rjr--—j^,6

0

g0

roo0oo

0oo0

z

-i-t.

0

C

o

C

f~.

0

0,

0

CD

_L

CO

C

oCO

^r

"

xjcTo£T)

^>

Z

Z

z

^

^n

^

o

c

o

c

o>o

$o

CO

CO

C

0

—2J

^^

t

O

J

oIT

i

oo

rooooo

0oo0

z

o

C

o

C

o

C

ro

ro

0

C

CO

C

CO-g

C

<~3

^

["

-

t

0o00

N.

C

c

c

C

o

C

cro

CDCT

C-P

COCT

CDCT

CO

C

CO

C

~,

>r~-<— tn

9

9ro

CD

CO

O

< " O

-1 °

z

"

^*mCO

z

-i

mi.

z

mon

Z

— g

mCD

Z

^mCD0

z

m

z-j

§

--J

?

_i

CO

oO

D 0j- w c

S 3

D ?/

Page 39: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CO U _j

~° £ "ro|?^U • l/>m —a 2 £3 ra to O ™

o « <*O TO O

z 5oO

_QCD

<r~-

g"Tr--5

CD•cj-

g

g-z.<f

g

5z.

°r<CCO

5Sh-

5z

°rCO

g

g

03CO

g

g-z

COCM

g2

r-~g~z.

<CM

g

g

Q.Q P "50 5 >o: <o fjo

CO

0

CNI

o

g0

AN

AL

YT

E

z>o

Z)o

13

O

Z)o

Z)o

Z>o

— )_oT3

O)eg

Z)o

C\l

oo0ot

CM

J

0)T3

p

O

>

Z)

o

Z)

z>

D

O

Z)

o

Z)o

Z)

0

Z)o

<z

o0ooin

oo00CM

O0

tran

s-1

2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e

COrr

Z)

Z)

0

Z)o

Z5o

Z>o

ogCO

Z)o

mh-

<~Z.

<

<

1 2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

(to

tal)

•f

D

o

Z)o

Z)

o

D

o

Z)o

CO

Do

<z

o0ooin

oo0oCM

or

cis-

1 2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

ne

T3

C-4

Z)

Z)

O

Z)o

Z)o

Z)o

i~-

Z)o

m

ooooCM

OOCO

in

Tri

chlo

roe

the

ne

-

Z)

o

Z>o

Z)

Z)

o

Z)o

120

Z)o

<z

o0oom

oo00CM

in

1 1

2-T

rich

loro

eth

an

e

^)o

^3

o

o

Z3o

o

Z)o

Z)o

Z)o

m

o0oin

oooCO

m

Te

tra

chlo

roe

the

ne

^3

3)

o

oCM

Z)o

Z)o

^1o

)

0

Z)o

<

oom

ooo

o0

Ch

loro

be

nze

ne

z>c

Z)Q

12c

Z5

O

z>

Z)o

Z)o

Z)0

<Z

o0ooCM

OCM

CM

1 1

2 2

-Te

tra

chlo

roe

tha

ne

mm

oCM

rCMCD

COOO

soI-

Q

CO

"o

_J15)ZJ

tra

tion

s in

c8coo

<

CD

~m

wtj

ceuor

"5COCD

Sro

=UJII

0)

co-z.II

ove

the

calib

ratio

n lim

it

.0ro

ro

:ed

conce

n

roE

UJuLU

cO

'roiuc

sam

ple

co

"O0)

QiiQ

1)

Q)

CL

CCOCJO

QOK-DCDCDOXCD

£3CO<D

•oCD

"roiiCO

CD

O

g

exc

ee

ds

G

CDZ)

"ro>uTJ

roCD

oCM

g

exce

eds

G

CD^ro>II

_Q

ro

£b

g

exce

eds

G

CDZ)

>uu

applic

able

ozu

z

COCMO CM

o ^h- t

Page 40: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

O)o

-0 O" H

=k D

Oa

"0

1)"

OgD

R 2 O i rj ~

5 I^ T

X O O

Z Z

o o o c o o o c o

C C C C C C C C C

C C C C C

o o o o

C C C C

c o o o oc c c c c

0 0

c c

C

c

o o o o

c c c c c c c

O

oJ b

O

oo

O S Jf"> w o

ff o

Sit^r W C

Page 41: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

c

t

(Ur

0-j£ "5)

3 ro —U) Q ^

O « <O ro O> 5 O

i?>

Q0a:

oCD

0

51-

zooro05t-

Z

oooCOo51-

z

0oCM0

mh-

5z

ooCDCMO

m1—

§z

ooinCMom

z

ooCMO

5

gZ

Q.

? "55§|O

ro

§0

CN

i

LUH>_J

<Z<

Q

O

Z) Z) Z)

O 0,0 O ' O O O O O

^} ^1 ^} ^> ^

o o o o o o

CO

"o

=> Z> 3>

o o oo o oo o oo o oin CM in

o oo o oo o o

0m

Z r~-

ro

^

0)

ITO Q

c O

CDccuj:

o S-C -C

CO-C

0) w

CO 2 Oc o Ov CD S >£ c o _

oe

-^ CM ^ Q y o 5 HO

oc/) Q

y CM o (-

£ ra 'N w £

ob

O ^

COCMO CM

Q ^I- •*

= II II ii -C< Z) LU Q -0

<

Page 42: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

D mit iio m

o c c cre T> T>•D re CD

OOore

CO

o

_rere

^ ^"l_+ ZT

ro 0

ro 0-1 re-D Z)^T r j

" re~J Z>zr D

g

zr

-c

*o Oo

ro 00 O

O

Mo eno oo o0

Z Z

o o

C C

o o

c c

-H -•re _,

u ro

S H0 0

o 2-D qzr o•D re13 "~*

^ CJ

~l

on en

, ro?s oR 8— 0

g g8 °8 8

•^ >

O 0

C C

0 0

C C

H "^ jo

O ro

1 |CD g-

re o

zr

o

— g^ O

hOOJ 0O 0o o

0

ro ono oo o0 O0 O

77

3>

o o

C C

0 0

C C

_^roD0

q~ozrCD

CD

O01

Z

~ZL

Z

en

o

c

0

C

— <-_ D

L. Ozr

ro Q-

o CDzrooozrCDZJQ

o roo

ro0o rooo

on f»o oo oo oo o

> M

o o

C C

0 O

C C

•z.r~

m

a

iro

O

O5" ® •"s § 8z-4

ro

so0

•z.

ro . to ;^oo :

O S 5

S O crj- w c^ r* -r-

c to

Page 43: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

w

t * ¥?

£ < S I^ ro row Q 5-D - <8 ~ °§ iio |co

o

CD_a

CD

gLUr~-gZ

§LLJr~-§

o

LUI*!-

gZ

Q

*•?mr-§

o>CQ

N->:>Z

LUa:

LUa:

TCQ

r*-

Z

tr<i

|S

zCO

op1 -

z

QOtr

O

mr>-^»$

o.3CraCD

O

LUo;

1_i

CO

O

<N

i(3

LLJ

<

<

Z)

0in

O

o

0in

—jIDoin

—>IDom

Z>0m

— j3

Oin

Z>oin

— >ID

om

<Z

ooo03

Oooo

ooCO

CD

hlor

oben

zen

oQCO

--

^1

0m

rcoo

130in

—3^oin

~~>Z>0in

T3

vnf--

i^>0in

D0in

— jro0CN

in

oooCO

ooooro

in

0)

hlor

oben

zen

oQTt'-

Zi

oin

~-

^~~

Z)

oin

~>

oin

— >Z)

oin

Z)

oin

— jZ)

oin

Z)

0in

-^>Z)oin

<Z

OooCO

oooo

ooCD

CD

hlor

oben

zen

oQCM

'-

2

Qnmr-

0in

—>Z)oin

-—)^0in

CD

~~s^>

0in

-r-

—3

CN

Omro

oom

oooo

or--

CDcCD

richl

orob

enz

h-•#CM

••-

Zi

CJ

— j

— 'CN

^1

CM

3CM

~~3

Z3

C\J

^

Z)

CM

Z)

CM

ID

CM

-^3

CM

<Z

oCO

<

-

nior

ophe

nol

oSCDrx

CD

rj0)

inroCM

T-

^J-CM

t/>OO

CO

raoh-

Q

CD

"5

3iCDo: JO 21

,jB)3

C

COCO

nj

CDOCoo

3

LJ-

1)

d>"—

X3-SrapcloLJUII

—>

t3SOJ1o

IIz>

CD-C

¥

rocg

conc

entra

XISro

toLUIILU

cg'rocCD0

§0)Q.Eroto-oS2QMD

Q.3Cro0)O

Qoo;

Its e

xcee

d

3t/>0>

•o<u-oroXCO

ra<D

O•r-

oa>

?8X0)CD3ra>ura

rocCD

OCM

Oto"OCD

SXCDCD

^>ro>MJD

ro

CD

bro

gO

COT3

CDOCJXCD

CD3

ro>itu

jhca

ble

Q_T>

OZii<Z

COCMO CNCM 9O CM

Page 44: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CD C ~ O

o; yCt) ^~\

0 ^ 35 1

Qga

— 12.S.GO

6o(/>

TJ

^5o:ro

o

T)13O

-

^

CO

>

N)

C

ro

C

ro

;—

__iro. —

'—

rof—

ro

C

k

ro. —

"-

NJ

Cj

ro

C

-ro-t--H

o

O

ocrt>

NCD

CD

O

0OOO

en00

COeno

eno

en0

C

eno

C

eno

C

en0

C

en0

C

enoc

eno

C

ono

C

-•f^

^^o

g.•ri

5No0

0

ooo

COoo

z

enoC

en0

C

enoC

enoc

eno

C

eno

C

en0

C

eno

C

onO

C

-»-u

6o

oocrQ^NOD0

en

OJ00oo

CD0oo

en

eno

en0

C

eno

C

^no

^

o

C

onO

C

eno

C

eno

C

eno

C

occ_

c"c"D

NCD

1

C0

o0oo

CCcco

2

eno

C

en0

C

enoC

enoc

eno

c

enoc

onoC

eno

C

eno

C

>Z>r~-<m

en

2^*

NJ

O

CO

O

? s §5L c O

1

m

z

D 71

c m

z

m§CO

ZgT-Jm

f

zg7^m

on

Z

-si

m

CO

Z

,m

I

z

g;mo

z

sm

Page 45: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

<Q

CO

en•t

13 03 CDCO Q C

T3OO

Ooco

O

CM

03

CD00

t--

§

LLJ

OCO

UJ LU2 K

m

LU

Q.Q g "55

gJJco

O

O

o c o om m m m

ID Z) Z> Z> z>O O O O f\j

in m m m "^

Z)oo o o

m m m

3 Z> Z5 z5

O O O CMin in in ^

3 Z) Z) Z)o o o oun m in m

o oo oo o00 oo

o o oo o oo o oo o on i- t-

oin o o ,_

0)

CD 0) 0> UJC C C N0) 0> 0) CN N N 0>C C C _Q1) 0) 0) On .0 .o >.£ 2 2 —-2 _° .° ti: ^ -c co o o i_Q Q D 4ro 4 CM CM"

OO

CO

2o

!O

'o

_JO)r:cy?c0

~iv^%coo

<

t, R

= R

ejec

ted

r)t/>0)

X>

2CO

£

LLJII

— >

t3£*Q>•oco

nz>

[he c

alib

ratio

n li

a)>o-Orocgroc

§•a£'m

toLLJII

LLJ

CO

?"c0)oc80)a.ECOU)

T30)

13

QllQ

»

?

Q.3Croa>oQOa:OJ

8X<uJ23«&)

•od>-oro.cCO

ra

-2b;>S0

xcee

ds

<D§CO>IIro

ro

£b

CM>•>O

xcee

ds

OJ0)^ro>M.n

ro

£uro•

O

xceeds

cu<pZ3

"ro>no

(D

.Oroo"a.r±TO

0

II<•z

COCMO CM

CM SO CMQ C

Page 46: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-HO

w ty) O m CII 3- II M I'J- K a rn< Q- - o ^~M ro ~ — o— n « ^ ^^ 3 n ^ Q.

a o o

c ~O CD

o>

ct> ^ r: '—

^?CD

HO2J

Q

O

Cooen

T?~

;•jr•~T

O

0

§

— i

Z

roO

Z

^r j

C

_.r ^

CL

ro

C

r j

^

ro

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C<_

ro

C

_,.r^

J-H

"^

rJ-?T

T

,_

0O

O

o

_no

d

{_*!

O

C

cn0

r~

0

C

cn0

C

eno

C

IDo0)

O

cn0

Cc_

cn0

C

_ir

0

^og.

5roro

G)00

oo0o

CDooo

z

cno

C

cnor-

Jl0

c

cnO

•3

cn0

C

eno

C

CO

en

0

C

cn0

C

{,

Oo

O

O

3

CD

"D

O-Oo

0

CDog

-•,

cno

C

cn0

C

cn0

C

cnO

C

cn0

' —

cno

C

CD

CO

QJ

cn0

C

eno

C

^•^

rrCo

5?o

O"joo

oo0o

CDOo0

z:

cno

C

LnO

C

„oC

eno

cno

C

eno

C

cnO

C

cno

C

cno

C

Z

1—

m

o

ro

Q

CO

r~CD

I

-£J

m

73m

z

V1

rnen

Z

--g

rnCD

CDo

1m

Oo ;ocu o§ o"O

mCO

z

-^jim

1T4

m

z

1

CD

i)

m

1

1ro

z

5

Page 47: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

<» 5o

"O -^c 55Z3 Tt ,c i ™=> CO

CO QT3 i-

CJ)Z)

c/)to>*roc

00

.5?_Q03H

QODC

<r-^

§5f^§Z-

tn-*t55N.->>-z.

<t^>

2N.§

tr<CO

5h-;*>z

CO

5*? KN.^»>-z.

coCO

;>>5r^->5*-z.

m<NJ

~>S

f^-g~Z-

CL

= 1s so

CO

C3

C\J

O

1

O

Ul

<<

r)0

m

Z)

0

uo

0in

Z)

om

Z)oin

^join

— ]

oin

<Z.

oooCO

oooo

ooCD

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

*-

^

o>n

Z3

om

^0

in

Z)oin

Z)

oin

^om

om

m

oooCO

ooooCO

in

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

*-

_i

^im

z:oin

H>

om

3

oin

130in

^ouo

23

oin

<Z

oooCO

oooo

ooCD

2-D

ich

loro

be

nze

ne

--

=> Z-i0 -j

in ^

3> Z>

0 CM

m ^

^ —,

0 ojin *™

=> 3O ^vj

LO T~

3) ID

0 c\JLO ^

— ,t

0 OJm ^~

— , ~^-^ Z)0 CM10 ^

§i

§ §oO rf-0 $0 Z

or~

2 4

-Tn

chlo

rob

en

zen

e

en

tach

loro

ph

en

ol

Dia

l S

VO

Cs

- CL h-

<DD

ro>•o£t>CD,CD

rvrii.

II

cc

"5CO0>

•aCD

=H 2

II co

nce

ntr

atio

ns

in u

g.

= N

on-d

ete

ct,

J= E

stir

< 3

Ecgro.0

sCD

i5rocg

=Est

imat

ed c

once

ntra

LU

entra

tion

=Dilu

ted

sam

ple

conc

i

Q

CO

sCD

Q.13Cro0)T3QOCC

hade

d re

sults

exc

eed

w

•1 c

riter

ia=

Val

ue e

xcee

ds G

W-

ro

ro

3o

CM

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-

n

ro

Sb

CO

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-

o

CDJ3

3CLCLCO

"5z.n<z.

D

Page 48: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

HOo

C

O ET

a o

73toa>

a>o

H T)O T

CLJ5 0

O ^O c

f

-

ZT>

^

Z>

_^.r j

!

ro

C

rj

NJ

C

_jro

C

ro

C

_iro

C

irj*•— 1

o

ooCT

13

-

3

co00

0o

Cn

O

cn0

c

Cn

0

c

0

c

cnO

C

cno

C

cnO

C

^

r,.

3~

OO

D'-I"D

^

CT)0O

OO0O

3,O

0

z•*

cnO

cnO

C

01

o

c

0

c

eno

C

cno

C

^no

C

^t»0o

o*oCrO

rj

"

CJo00

ODo0

n

cnO

_n0

C

cn0

C

cn0

C

-Jio

c

cno

C

cno

C

^

^^^

~

<r

GOO

o0oc

oco

z*

cno

cno

C

en0

' —

cnO

C

cnO

C

cno

C

^no

C

>

•^

m

0

O

K>

0

CO

O

^ ^ Cro g o

•a

|

CD

2

-^J

5o

2

<

^

1

2

1CDca

O0

3'A-SQ)3CJ

a.

3Q>

ro

3"yiSCD

3

>IV)

O

2|o So 5>

ooa_3CO.

^CC/)

c03

O (Q) Cffl_^ ,to r>5 c

D 5g ™aT

O

O

Page 49: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

s S

c en z)t i c/5

° s

QOor

CD

§LUr-—gZ

^LUr .<£Z

o

LUt^_

§Z

QO)

opN.gZ

CD

CDN-<J

Z

tCO

z

cr

CD

-^>

Z

CO

mC;z

0

CO

t

Z

CL

= $S ®o ~"

CO

5

CM

O

•7

1LU

£l1

<!Z<i

3

LOCO

o

^10LO0o

D

oLO00

ID

omoo

^oinoo

— )

in

ID

oT~0

ID

O

oo

Z>

o

Z

COo

z

ino

ID

O1ou0

<

0

oLOoo

-,o00

ID

oLO0Q

ID

oo

ID

o10oo

— >

10

ID

o^~o

Z)

oLO0

0

120

z

CO0

z

mo

CMCM

ooo<

^yc_-o

— }

o

0o

13

oLOoo

D0

oo

0

oo

3in

33

o^o

^}

o00

Z)

0

z

CO0

z

mo

CM

CM1

ooo<

-LOoo

-)oLOo0

3

oinoo

Z3

oinoo

oLO-CIo

_J

oCO

r--

13o*~o

-1oin0o

uCO

0~J

z

CO0

Z

in0

CD

CM1

ooo<

~"oinoo

-,0in0o

12

oin00

CL

0

_,Q_

CM

0

_,

OCO

ID

Ora

roto0

CMO

0CO

oCO

z

coo

2

ino

LOCMiOO0

<

J

0LOOO

Z)

OLO00

13

om00

13

OLOoo

^oinoo

— >

in

IDo*~o

^D

OLOo0

D

o

Z

COo

z

ino

0CDCMiOoo<

^fo

CM^O

CDCO

COto0

CM0

0m

COmOQ_

"ri-~

t-

Q?b

CD

'o

0)o:M

or:

ibra

_,13

C

V)coCOi

§coo

<

13toCD

T3

"rapc^

LUII

—3

tuTJcozII3

CD

S-aCOcg"ro

d co

ncen

'

VCOeto

LUII

LU

co"ro"c

c8CDQ.

CO«

TDS

aIIQ

1_CO<DO

QOorT)

ults

exc

ee

</>O

13Q>

CO

CO

racu

u>

g0

0)tl>oXo>OJZJ

>II

TJ

CO

CDt±

O

CM

g

e>TJCO

SXCD

0)ZJ

>II.0

ra

o-£o

50

TDCDOOXCD

CDZJ

ra

llo

0)

.0

sa.Q_

rao

i

Z

COCMO CM

D C\- it

Page 50: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

co o m^ M MS O [P

oo — ^ c.

VnO

£

X X

"") Ot a>O- Q

c

-r"TX

CJ

3o"

CL

Oo13r~i

o a

^*" f~

- =Cl O Q

£ = 5. O

roO

O

—1X•i--^

cc

ro^j

>

CO^

0

enro

>ooo"

rH

-

0

^

2

oro

Z

0

o

0

C

ooen0

c

0

0

o

c

oo

0

o

0

c

ooeno

C

oo

o

cz

oroen

C

oo

o

c

>Q

oc

ftI-

oen

2

•~>o

2

0oen0

c

ooen0

C

0

oeno

c

ro

"CJoTJ

OCO

<~

ooeno

C

0

oeno

C

oenro

0)o

ooeno

C

>

oo0

r jr°

on

Z

Oc,.

Z

ooen0

C

c0eno

C

ooeno

c

0

0eno

C

0

oc

ooeno

C

o0eno

O

roen

C

ooeno

C

>oco

to

'•'

0

Jl

Z

0CO

Z

0

oenO

C

O

oeno

C

0

oeno

C

ooen0

c

o

0

c

ooeno

C

ooen0

C

oroen

C

ooeno

C

>ooo

\

0

C71

Z

ojj

Z

0

oen0

C

ooen0

C

0

oeno

C

ooen0

C

0

o

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

oroen

C

ooeno

C

>Q

Oc

c

^cr

2

cCO

2

Cen0

C

ooen

~

0

oeno

c

ooen0

c

o

0

^

ooeno

C

ooenoc

0

roen

C

ooeno

C

-^—r

-^

—i

m

CD

-!

iKJ

O

"CO

OS" ^< OJ

— c

Z£-~jm5

z

D T'c m

^Z

-~4

m

^CD

Z5

m

£

z?

m§en

Z<

m<ECO

z

_^m

1

|• j^*m0

z

7^

m

|

ZlOa

Page 51: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

0)

CO-Dct C/)

in

_aCD

QOOL

tLU5r- -§Z

CO

LUS

r-§

CMLLJSr--$z

mCO

ill2r~-§zQCDCM

LLJ5N.

§zCDCM

LLJSti

z<CM

U)2r-5ZQm

LU

N.5zCD

LU?r|

Q.

C "5>

8 jjo

CO

0

CM

O

0

LU(->-G<<

Z)

0inoo

oinoo

D0inoo

30LOoo

3omoo

nomoo

3

Oinoo

r)in

o

Dm

o

<

COo

<Z

mo

(O

o

ooo<

23

om0

ID0moo

D0m00

omo0

oinoo

omo0

oinoo

23

in

o

IDm

o

<Z

roO

<Z

in0

CMeg

,0oo<

oLO0o

0inoo

1)0mo0

130moo

IDom0o

13

om0o

12

Omoo

^iL.O

O

r)in

o

<Z

ro0

<Z

ino

CN•CN

0UO

<

0oLO

-t

0

0LOo0

oinoo

r>omoo

)0moo

D0inoo

—>3.™CD

~}

Q.om

o

<Z

COo

<Z

ino

ootCM

,Ooo<

LT

O

^o

0in00

't

o

3

oinoo

D0ino0

in'£>o0

in

o

23

in

o

<Z

COo

<Z

in0

jmeg

ooo<

^,

CO

O

-•>COLOOO

LOOo

omCO

o

0in0o

oino0

2o

oinoo

in

o

23in

o

<Z

COo

<z

ino

o<0CM

t0o0<

-o

-t

l_'

mCD00

o

o

,0CDuLL

75

\—

<Q

cr>'o

_,13)

c

co"ro

CDOCoo

<

CDCDo:II

cc

"5CD

CDTocf

LUII

— )

"o

•o

o

IIz>

calib

ratio

i

CD_c

§o.0racg

d co

ncen

tra

.2raEjtoLUII

LU

CgTo"£CDo

8o»CL

ra

T3«

^Q

II

Q

CD

Q.

Cnj

"oQ0tr010>oX0)

"3toCD

CD"Oroco

ro

•±^b

xcee

ds G

W

CD

CDZJ76>uro

ra

So

CM

O

CDCDOXCD

CDZ)ra>ii

JO

--^

,-

6(S)~o0)ooX0)

a;

TJ>iio

Q

Page 52: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

zo

o r

oo

i i J2 P-1 Q

^ Zl

'

nOCO

0

0-sj

0

en

^

ro

enen

>s

ono

r-

i

>

o

Z

o0eno

C

ooonO

C

00ono

C

ooono

C

0

en

C

o

o

C

Oeno

C

0

oon0

C

0oeno

C

>o

ro

o01

Z

oOJ

Z

O0eno

0

0-si

ooen

T)

ooeno

L

o

0

enen

o

0

oeno

C

0oonoC

>O

r _,

-i

z

^

1

o0eno

C

0

oeno

0

0eno

C

o0eio

C

o

on

C

O

o

C

oono

C

ooono

C

ooono

C

>Ooo

ro

T J

0

z

o< 0

z

ooonO

0

oo

00OnO

C

o0ono

o

en

o

o

C

0ono

C

O

oono

C

0oonoC

>Ooo

I- Jr ^

0

Z

0

z

ooonO

C

O0eno

C

ooono

C

0

0ono

C

o

en

C

o

o

C

oeno

C

ooonO

C

O

oono

C

>

C.

^

r

>

ooo

Z

ooonO

C

0

oenc

C

ooono

C

00ono

C

o

en

c

o

0

C

Oeno

C

ooenO

C

O

oonoC

§

i —

Hm

C

O

M

o? § 0

^ c °

Z

men

Z

-sj

mCO

z

mCOo

z-si

m

z-J

§

z

CO

jo

z- 1

M

Z

1MCD

z

1COC3

Page 53: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

t

cuis"a a§oO

OO

00cr

COCD

>

r !_

1

CO

^

"Yh--

z:

oh-§N-<>

Z

CQ

5

fv;>z

§fj_

5zm

§f .gz

3

^

^§z

°rCO

<>

5

^r*-

Z

ITCO

i

^Z

Q.

11

O ~"

CO

0

CM

0

Y

U

LU

^

1•Z<c

15CDino1 — '

j

CD

O

0

^0inoo

oinoCD

om00

oin00

^oin0

0

13om00

Doinoo

Z

CO

O

z

eno

CD

o

oo0

<

5

0mor >

-,

0moo

oino0

0LO00

oinoo

0inoo

oin0CD

— ,

0inoo

130inoo

Z

COo

<z

ino

CMCM

Ooo<

3

o^

-,0moo

—,

omoo

„in00

0ino0

om0o

D

oLO0

0

D0inCD

o

D0LOoo

1

no

<

Z

mo

CN

C J

O__,o<

13oL.Oo

"nrjinoo

ID

Oinoo

oo. — *

ooo

ooo

_,oin0

°

-,

oLOo0

Z5

oiroo

Z

COo

z

ino

OO

CM

Ooo<

-JCDLOCD

^

3

0moCD

oinoCD

oin0o

0ino0

0in0o

o03oCO0

13

Ou~oo

13

oLOoo

z

COo

<z

ino

mCM

o0o<

3

omo0

-,

oin00

0inoo

ouoCD

o

0in00

om00

0

CDin00

_,

oLO00

15

0inoCD

Z

COo

^mo

o(OCM"r~

00o<

COo

mo3-

T3

h-

Q

ID

'o

_J

3

C

Cg"ro

c

88—<c

R =

Rej

ecte

d

I ."5u?o>

TD2ra

toLUn

2'5TJ

coZIIZ)

le ca

libra

tion

1

±=9o.0rocg

d co

ncen

tra

'roECOLUII

LU

c0

1c

§CDQ.

COCO

6nQ

CD

Q.

CCOCDO

Qoce-o0)0>oX0)

CO

"5</)cu

13

f—

00

raCD

b

xcee

ds G

W

0)

0)

"ro

1!

ra

CD

oC-J

6CD

OXCD

0)

"ro

ii.0

CD

b

otoCDO0X0>

0>

cc

!|

o

01

1o.Q.

ra

n<3lz

CO

S CN

Q

Page 54: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-Iu

CO O Tl - >=J" II N II =S o T , 2

i; x jj

§ z z

z z

o o o o o o

C C C C C C

o o o o o oo o o o o oji Ln en Ln en eno o o o o oC C C C C C

o o o o o oo o o o o oen en en en en enO O O CD O O

z

§m

CD

0

O

O

<

-•§

0o

to

sCO

3

SQ.

D)3

C

D) v/ "

3_*.

70C)O

H

oo

-D I-

CD-

"Ǥs

o>

Page 55: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

o3

2 1— f~\ ' ^co O

-D -^ CD

c o 35 ^ COtl 1 —CD COQ. S >>3 ro ro

CO Q c-a - <O Q-> f >X -~ *— '| gor -^* ^>o "° cnu CO^- D

o0

•3-<<D

_aro1-

h^

§LUr~—gH

(D

gLU

r~->_>Z

gLUr-gZ

o

gLUr-->S>

0)

CQr- -•->gZ

tCDN-->gZ

trO3

CQr^~>gZ

00

CQr~gZ

to

CQr^-gZ

CL

R -1g SJ5

oCO

gO

<N

gO

o

AN

AL

YT

E

Z) Z)

0 0LO LO

Z) D

-^ roLO LO

=> roo ^m ^

Z) J

0 OLO LO

Z) Z)

0 O

in uo

Z) Z5

O 0

LO LO

Z) Z)

O 0

LO LO

Z) D

0 0

LO IT

3 roin

Tj U >

LO ^

< uo

o oo oo oOO CO

0 Oo oo oo o*- CO

oO LO.D

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

• '-

3 D

o oJ^ LO

z;*o ^-irj

QCM^ ^

•1-

Z! Z5

0 0iT- LO

Z) Z!

0 0

LO in

o° COin

D Z)

0 0LO in

Z)

0 coLO

Z)CO

-J- COm

<r °S mZ CO

0 <~,

§ §

o o0 Oo oO 0

§ s

2-D

ichl

ocob

enze

ne

2 4-

Tnc

hlor

oben

zene

• T-

C-JT~

3)CO '-

Z)CJ

^\J h-

O4

Z)

CNr-

^ 0CM CO1~

^j

CM

^1 ^

"M CO

Z3 CO

^ ^*~ T~

<~z.

oCO

<

-

enta

chlo

roph

enol

otal

SV

OC

s

Q. h-

CDZJro>-oCOuCDCD

OLIIo:"5LOo>

T3fl^

\\ co

nce

ntr

ati

on

s in

ug/

L

= N

on

-de

tect

, J=

Est

imaU

< Z)

Ecgro-Q

30)£CD>OJDro

=E

stim

ate

d co

ncen

trat

ion

LU

cg"ra

=D

ilute

d sa

mpl

e co

ncen

tr

a

COCD>.5!Q.3

roCDoQ

hade

d re

sults

exc

eed

RO

to

ra

S

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-1 c

ro

ro

oj

bCM

OCO

"CJCDCDOXCD

CDZJ

"ro>uX!

ro

.2

= V

alu

e ex

ceed

s G

W-3

ci

A =

Not

ap

plic

ab

le

0 Z

oCMCO

a

COCMO CM

Page 56: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-HO

c >

O

roo

TJ -i _i -i. 1

J ^ 0 ^ Ue -H o n o

o I}, o ^ o-g 0 0 0 0

zr C O T ^

^ _5 O T r~ -J n z: z.

T "•> T -t

"p

-^ -J p en o

-7- O O O Oo o o o0 0 0 0

, n cc o cCD ^J 0 0 Oo y o o o0 o o o

z ^ ? ^ ?> 0 > >

_» en Ln ui J^M O 0 0 0

c c c c c

_i (_n en Ln jif^ c? o o o

c c c c c

_> en 01 01 Lnfo O O O O

c c c c c

_^ U1 T LI 01

-^ iv r j ro r- .c C C C C

f j 0 0 0 0

c c c c c

_i 01 en Ln en10 O O O O

c c c c c

_i en en Ln enr° o o o o

C c C C C

_^ Ln Ln Ln Ln^° O o o O

C C C C C

2

Is-\m

•c?

a

K)

O

CO

O£T o 73

||82

rnSCO

1"m

2

"m

Ol

1^m

CD

I

"^m

i2

-g

m

o

2

§•~J

m

-z.

m

CD

COroo

Page 57: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

_0>

CO

"a

_0)

ro

en3

=> ro roCO Q c

.2 Ooo

CO

O

O

QOa:

LLJ

>

Z

CO

LU

N-

Z

CMLU

>

Z

Q.

D

mCO

LU

Z

CDCO

LLJ

5N-

mCM

LLJ

t^-

z

LLJ2rj .

§z

Q.

c «>S c oO

CO

O

CM

O

0

UJ

_J

z

_,

0

m

13om

Z)

om

Z)om

Z)oin

Z>

om

^oin

Z

oooCO

ooo0

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

600

--

-^

0

ir.

Z)

oin

Z)

oLO

Z)oin

Z)oin

Z)oLO

Z)

oin

in

oooCO

ooo0CO

in

CDC

NC

ob£oQ

'-

_,

0

LO

3

C

m

Z)

om

Z>oin

0

in

-j

oin

Z)om

Z

oooCO

oo00

2-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

600

*-

Z) 13

O r-j

m ^

Z> Z)o ogin •-

Zi 30 (Min T~

3 3

O fMin T~

=> Z)

0 eg

uo ^

Z3 u0 CM

in ^

3

0 CMin -r-

o <^CO ^

§ §o0 ff

§ z

2 4

-Tn

chlo

rob

en

zen

e 70

en

tach

loro

ph

en

ol

1ot

al S

VO

Cs

T- 0. 1-

0)

CO

= R

ejec

ted

o:

II co

nce

ntr

atio

ns

in u

g/L

= N

on

-de

tect

, J=

Est

ima

ted

resi

< Z)

^E

bra

tion

1

sCD.C

=Est

imat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

abov

e

LU

=Dilu

ted

sam

ple

conc

entra

tion

D

«o>>CD

o.C

hade

d re

sults

exc

eed

RO

D c

leai

w

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-1 c

riter

ia.

ro

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-2 c

riter

ia

-0

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-3 c

riter

ia

o

CDJD

3Q.

roo

ii

~Z-

oCMCO

I(-

Ogo

(D

"o

COCMO CM

o ^

Page 58: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CO D^ llS O

^ Dro oo M

M OroCO

o c c^ ^ x

~ O CD

O GO O

Z!OO

D

COfoo

XJ

-t T)c re

— sCO 0z — ZT

O o0 or ~u

•3

r3c

?

CDo

Z

C*J

C

rj

C

ro

C

^3 oo

ro

C

ro

C

_^roC

ro

C

_.-_-U

-\2I _—

O

3re

T

_j

0Oo0

o

OJeno

enr j

C

eno

c

eno~

CD

0

CJCT

O

C

eno

C

eno

c

en0

c

-~r j6ou

ooCT0

0

re

j)0o

0oo0

COooo

>

hO

^

o

c

eno

C

0

•—

enO

C

eno

C

eno

C

o

C

-..uQ,

jrc5cre

re

re

0ooo

CCooo

en

ro

C

eno

C

eno

C

0

C

eno

C

en0

c

enoc

eno

C

^c~r;

oIT

O

OCTre

Nrere

coo

oo0o

CD0oo

>enro

C

eno

C

eno

C

0

*—

eno

C

eno

C

eno

C

eno

C

._

2»-£.\ —-<--

—1m

i0

ro

Ci

CO

OC 0 33< § 0

|

T'

men

'Z.

~?

mCO

IT4

m

-z.

g

z

1CD

Z

§ro

1

2§ro

0CT!

1

SroCD

Page 59: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

(D

CO ^ ^

c o 3.t 7 ^

3 03 roCO Q 5T3oo O

O

o ^ co^ Z)

o

-QCD

Q0or

CO

g5

z

g2t;

Z

CO

g15

r--gz

tgN-gz

rr

CO

g1

g

CC

CO

^^

g

mCO

gSl-~|

Q.

0 ~"

CO

<jCM

g

O

UJ

_J

Z

0in

^

oLO

Z)

^tin

^-tin

Z)

oLO

^D

Oin

30

Z

oooCO

ooo0

3 D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

600

T-

_i

.

oL^

Z>

-t

LO

13

-J

LO

Z)

0LO

Z)0in

^>o

in

0ooCO

ooooCO

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

5

r-

J

0

LO

^

0

LO

3-tir

=>Tj-

LO

Z)

0

LO

Z)

0in

Zoin

<

0ooCO

ooooT

2-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

600

T-

- -30 ,-j

,

0 ^g

in *~

Z) =>

^t ^fLO ^

Z 13

^} COIT ^

Z 3

0 -MLO T~

Z> U

0 ex,

LO •-

z> ;D0 ex.

in *~

s <ro •*-

§ §oO ffo -io *-

2 4-

Tnc

hlor

oben

zene

70

enta

chlo

roph

enol

1

otal

SV

OC

s

i- Q- h-

<D

ro

T3CD0CDCDL£u

f"V

l .

II co

ncen

trat

ions

in

ug/L

= N

on-d

etec

t J=

Est

imat

ed r

esul

< Z)

Eco=;raJD

3O.C

=E

stim

ated

con

cent

ratio

n ab

ove

LU

=Dilu

ted

sam

ple

conc

entr

atio

n

Q

to0}

—Q.Z3

hade

d re

sults

exc

eed

RO

D c

lean

CO

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-1 c

riter

ia

ro

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-2 c

riter

ia

_o

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-3 c

riter

ia

o

A =

Not

app

licab

le

z

D

gO

oin

COCMO CM

CN SO CM

Q ^

Page 60: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

z>

o mi it

o m

c ~ a

CD T> -

CD T (/)

0O13

oti ro CD

FT ™ -

- 3 _

Xin

X3

g_en

-1 ~D -" -• -1 -•S. 5 ivi f _ -c- eo— s *• c D aC/) o — 1 o ^ o<- J ^ ^ n =ro o 3 ° ° °" O n S O Or T3 tj cr cr cr

=r o TI o oO CT z: z> ^^3 <I> N N NO ^1 ^ T O— -xi n =: zi

T> ni ~* TIZJT>

_ . a> a>-» ^ 0 "1 00 0 0

— ^ CO -i-7 O O O Oe- o o o o> 0 O O 0

0 0 0 O

rn CO CO COCO "J 0 O O0 ° C 0 0

^ o o o

7 ^ 7 7^> -" > ^ >>* o ' -^

_i en en en en^ O O 0 O

c c c c c

_i en en en enf*J o o o o

C C C C C

_> en en en en^ o o o o

C C C C C

_^ en en en enf^ o o o o

C c C C C

_> en en en en^ o o o o

C c C C C

_i en en en en^J o o o o

C c C C C

•z.>

m

O

CD

KJ

CD

CO

O

?|§« i o

T3

Z$~J1

^^1o

z

s:oo

Z

-si

<bCD

Oo10>

S0)3CO

ss--- •<su3to

f

J;-| -

3sghff-M

H"

t^

9oC — r

wg. ?< S <0 5 oO nT o

3 0 0M 2. c•< 5T ~S

CO Ct

' "ML? '•p o aCQ 3" C

r2 O

s a

ro"

Page 61: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

c o

CO Q

;R ' ^£2 f

ro

o o3 <

ilS-D Q-£=o

z:O

O

LO

QOCC

CO

JLU

r^g

£

LU

r^

gZ

ID

J

LUr-^gZ

VLU

r-g

Z

O

gLUf^.

g

CD

CD

gZ

COF"-~

gz

a:

CD

L^

Z

CO

CO

gz

o

ca

gz

D.

C «

s lio

CO

gO

CM

O

LU1 — '

|

<c2!<C

n0

oo

D

ooo

Z)

0

oo

^00o0

Z)oinoo

0moo

3

inCM

Z)inCM

o

— 'in0o

^2)

inCM

o

z

CO

o

z

mo

CD

O

i

OOo<

13

°0

o

-,

0moo

Z)0ino0

^0m0

0

Z>omoo

omoo

^mCM

inCM

o

— 'inoo

Z3mCM

o

Z

CO

o

Z

ino

CMCM

ooo<

12

0

oo

-,

m0

0

1}omo0

-,

oin0

o

^0moo

oLO0

o

=>mCM

12

inCM

0

12

moCD

12mCM

o

Z

roO

Z

ino

CM

CM

i

Oo0

<

12

in0

0

-,

0LOoo

^>0LOoo

^0ino0

)

oUOoo

0inoo

oCD

CMCO

Oru

Q_

mo

— 'in0o

313

inCM

o

Z

roO

Z

ino

CO

CM

1

ooo<

13

oLO0

o

-,oino0

Z)oLOo0

Doino0

— )

omoo

0CO

o

oro

ELr

ID

Uroin^~

^fCMO

Oro

<D

ro

Z

roO

Z

ino

mCM

i

Oo0

<

D

0inoo

-,

oLO0

o

Z)

om0

0

Z)oLO0

O

D

0inoo

oin0

o

3

LO

OJ

^inCM

0

-1

moo

Z)

inCM

0

Z

CO

o

Z

ino

o<DCM

.

Ooo<

0CO

o

CD

Tf

'r~

O

CM

j-CMO

CO

CO

<s>moQ_

~ra-•r

\-

CMCL

<Q

1g

c0

^—.cd>oc0o

<

, R

= R

ejec

ted

—toS

>tim

ated

LUu—3oa>

c02uZ)

he c

alib

ratio

n l

i

w

oroco

2

d co

ncen

i

0)

fo

U)LUuLU

Q

.£=

§

CD

a

roto

S.2

uO

CD

.tuQL

Cro0)oQOET

§X

~?

<f>g)

0)

ro

W

ro

.2c:o

Ow

0)0)oXD

3ro

llCO

ro

uc\l

5

xcee

ds G

0)

CD13

0]

II

_Q

ro(D

0

CO

Oto

8UX

0)COz;Tj

II

O

D

Page 62: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

co u m c^ ii n ii'A D rr ^

-t^ —I^ Dt-o o o ° ° T

"D tJ QQ- Q. Q ^

o rn m f

~ o 5

Q CO CL 'Jj

C CD d O -5

0 0 : = ; ^ ;

O H

d O

O^

en

— 1

1gCO

o--J4-

O

'O

oeo

oenCD

o

CD

>0oo

ro

o

o

2

o

*r

oO_no

•-

O

oen0

: —

ooen0

C

0

0eno

C

0

o

e

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

O0eno

£3

ooeno

C

ooen0

C

>

g-

.-~*

.n

2

-

^

0_^J

CJn

O

'-D

O

Oen0

£;

0

oenoc

oeo—jn

OOJlo

~-

orocr>

"D

ooeno

C

ooen0

C

0

00

^

>0o

r jr

-

*

->

2

O

o_n0

^

o

o

1

ooenoc

ooeno

C

oo

^c

oo0

0

Mn

ooo

C

ooen0

C

ooen

C

g-r ->

r

^

2

-

f-

ooen0

ooeno

c

oo

oc

ooen0

c

ooeno

c

oO

o

'•—

ooo

c

0

oeno

C

ooen0

C

ooeno

C

>0

o

r jf j

••

?'

rj

O

o0

^

ooeno

ooenor^

O

Oen0

^

0

oenQ

c

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

0

oenoQ

ooen0

C

c

o

c

>

oc

~

'

2

r

2

oceno

C

oceno

C

ooeno

^

ooen0

C

oen0

C

ooeno

d

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

CD

oen0

Q

o0eno

C

2

I —

— im

9

C

0

eo

•- %5 CJ

-1

sn5

2

^,

mg

1--.J

m<Eeo

Z

msID

zt^j••m

0

Z•5,

m

z

m

C3

Z§,

m_liNJ

Z

§

7^g;m_Urora

m_liCDCD

-730a

Page 63: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

w-o

O z>

CO Q

o

QOQ:

CO

gr~-gz

g1

gz

o>LU^>

gZ

CO

LUr>h-

gZ

LU^>

^Z

UJ2

h-

5»z

LLJ^>

L^^>Z

LLJ

r—5>Z

Q.Z)QmCO

LLJ

^Z

Q.-3 —(— Q)

S 5o

ro

O

CM

gO

v1LU)

]

<c~z_<t

ooCD

^inCM

0

z>oino

Zoin0

0

ID0

o0

=,

oLO

O0

3

0ino0

Z)ouno0

33

oinoo

Z

o

Z

ino

CD

O

Ooo<

oin0

0

3

LO

CM

0

Z)

oLO0

o

Z)0LO

oo

ID

omoo

DoLO

oo

ID

oLO

oo

-,oinoo

Z)

om0

0

Z

o

z

in0

CMCM

,

OOo<

inoo

12

in

0

IDom0

o

ID0ino0

ID

Oinoo

Z>om0

o

ID

Oinoo

-,

0inoo

— j

0inoo

Z

o

z

ino

CM

(N,o

0

<

oLO

co

DLP

0

-oLO

0

o

^oLO

0

0

Doino0

Z)

om0

0

D

0inoo

ID0inoo

ID

ooo

z

CO

o

z

ino

CO

CM

OCJ0

<

rein^o

o

Z

Omoo

30moo

z>oinoc

IDomoo

D

oinoo

CO

0

CO

o

Z

roO

Z

ino

SCM

,

O0o<

~)

oLO

0

O

13

LO

o

r)oLP0

O

ID0LO

oo

=,oLO

oo

Z)oLO

oo

ID

oLO

oCD

-,oinoo

~)

oino0

Z

o

Z

ino

oCDCM

,

OO0

<

X)

0

CO

O

OO

0

1/5moQ_

ID*^t-

oOJCL

Q

13C

C/}C0

ro

cG)O

oo—

<

t, R

= R

ejec

ted

val

~5OJ

ect,

J= E

stim

ated

QJ

COZItID

the

calib

ratio

n lim

it

O

oJO

d co

ncen

tratio

n a

75

wLUIIUJ

co

ampl

e co

ncen

trat

T3£aiiQ

(n

Q>

a.13C

COoQ0o:CDCDoXCD

\n3COCD

CD

ro

W

CD

CD

b

0wCDCDoXCD

CD

"CD^IIro

roCO

bCM

0

0)0)oX0)

CD13

"CD-"n

_Q

CD

CD

O

CO

dto

80X0)

O

75-•no

CD

_Q

sQ.Q.

O~z.II

<£_z

COCMO CM

O CM

t- ^

Page 64: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

O rnII I!O m

c c c

oo

ri — — c_

0

5 C " o

O

0

HO

y.

TJ

OCD

~n

enO)

ro

>ooo

ro

o

on

zI>

C"

~

z

o

-

o

c

ooen0

C

0

0

o—

0

oen0

C

ooeno

C

o

en

C

ooeno

ooeno

•—

f,oo

ou

0

c n

^^

^

~'

Z

en-tiCJn

encr~ao

o0eno,—

o0eno

C

oceno

C

oeno

C

ro01n

o0eno

ooeno

"—

Jooo

-p

o

-"

z>•

oCJ

z

oc

oc

0

0eno

C

ooen0

r~

o0eno

C

o0eno

C

0

en

C

0

oeno

C

ooeno

C

J>ooQ

ii"0en

Z^>

oCO

Z

o

c

o

C

o0

0

c

o0eio

C

ooen0

C

ooeno

C

o

en

C

ooeno

C

o0eno

•—

>ooo

r ~^

o

en

Z5>

o^

Z

o

"

oc

0

0eno

C

o0eno

C

ooen0

C

ooeno

C

o

en

C

ooeno

C

O

oeno

C

>ooc

•^c

_

•-11

2TJ

o°"

}

o

c

0

C

0

oeno

c

0

0eno

C

ooenoC

ooeno

C

o

enC

ooenoC

ooenoC

-£,

Z

1 —X—1

o

^

of

r j

O

>

O

y =s o2. c 0

£

^

Z

<

ro

DC

Z5^g

ro

Z

~pj

^

elCD

-vl1

g

1z

§CO

Z

- 1

^>z§"

5CO

zg- 1

g

Page 65: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oCMQ_

QgO

c o

00 Q g

CD00

oo

_a03

* ,

<£t*

o"gQ roa: .s>

o

EroCD

onQ.

CM

EroCDJ3

-g

CO

EtoCD

CO

I0Q

m0)

52r-i

1

CO

5r*.

2

O

^N.

Z

CO

^>^*

K^1

IB

CO

^O

V

(5

UJ

<Z<£

-3

Oino0

_,

otnoo

omoo

^oinoo

12

Omoo

Z)

omo0

^>oinoo

-z.

0

<

mo

CD

O

Oo0

<

-,0ino0

— ,

oinoo

0inoo

~,

oin0

o

Z)oinoo

Z>omo0

Z)

oin0

o

Z

o

<

ino

CMCM

OU0

<

Z)

0ino0

-3

oinoo

0mo0

Z)oin0

o

^oinoo

Z>oino0

Z)

om0

o

Z.

o

<

mo

CM

CM

O0O

<

-j

Omoo

_,

0inoo

omoo

^omoo

=>omoo

Z)

oinoo

Z)oinoo

^

CO

o

z

tno

oo

CM

0Oo<

-,0inoo

Z)

0inoo

oinoo

ZJ

oin0

o

^omoo

12oino0

Z>omoo

Z

o

<

mo

inCM

oo0

<

-,

0ino0

Z)oinoo

—~j

0inoo

12

Oin0

o

3oinoo

nomo0

3

oin0

o

Z

o

z

m0

otoCM

OO0

<

oin

toCOoCL

~So\-

_J

3

CO

!?cCDOco0

<

3-D

£TjCD

CDa:n

ce"50)

Est

imat

ed

n— >oa;75

coZIIz>

bove

the

cal

ibra

tion

limii

intr

atio

n a

S

§T3

E

IDII01

CoTo

§

§CDa

CO

-o£

DIIQ

clea

nup

leve

ls

DOtrCD0)OXCD

3(D

0>

CO

CO

rocCD

O

O

xcee

ds

CD

CD

"ro>nro

roJD

bCM

OV)

CDOX0!

CDZ)

CO

>II

_o

roCD

O

O

xcee

ds

CD

CD

"ro>IIo

CD

1CLro

o

11<£

z

COCMO CM

CM 3O CMD 1I- *t

Page 66: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

d>

ro

o -r

• § Vm

Q. 5.3 ro

C/5 O

i: roo 3

a> **.ro O

O

oo

Iroe>

CD

<.CDJ3CD

£l

§UJr---

Z

CD

UJ

C;z

-

UJ

z

o

LU

t

•z.

CD

g

"=f

?.

o:en

CD

CO

CDr~-

^O

CDf-^-

g

0.

Q 3 <"0 ro >cr n> _j

o

CO

gC5

CM

§

gO

AN

ALY

TE

-Qro

5

^

CO

roCMCO

JDro

oCM

o-CM

CO

-

roenen

Z)

o

Z>o

JDroenCM

CM

OOOO

CM

CM

CD-g

o-CO

c>

->CDCO

CM

^

Z)

COCO

15

Z)

o

Z)

COCM

_,

O

Z)

o

Z)

o* —

-z.

oo0om

ooooCM

oo

CDCCDr-

an

s-1

2-D

ich

loro

etl

~

oa>

oCCin

ooo

ooo*

toCO

CT>in

_j

o

^>o

COf

in

Z

Z

<

2o

2-D

ich

loro

eth

en

e(t

<-

rooCO

rooin

roooo

rooCOen

inCO

LO

IDo

Z>o

in

Z.

oooom

o0ooCM

0

CDc

s-1

2-D

ich

loro

eth

e

<->

ro

oCO

ro

o^~

roooCMCO

roo

CM

Z>

o

ro

CM

-,

COCMO

z>o

ro^f

m

oo0oCN

O0CO

in

rich

loro

eth

en

e

i-

z>T-

CO

Z>

'—T~

ro—jCMCM

CnCM

^

O

r>COCM

Z)

o

1)o

Z)0

^

^ooo0in

ooooCM

in

o>

1 2

Tri

chlo

roe

tha

n

*-

Z)

,-X

3^'

Z)

COCO

Z>

CM

Z)

o

0

CO

Z>

o

Z)

o

Z>

01 —

in

o0oLO

Oo0co

m

etr

ach

loro

eth

en

e

h—

Z>^CC

3t—

•""

roCO

r>

CDOJ

r>o

CMO)

_,

O

Z>o

T

-z.

o0ir

ooo

oo

hlo

robenze

ne

o

D

,-x>

Z)

TT~

COCO

Z)

CM

Z)

o

3

COCM

Z)

o

Z)

o

Z>

01

-z.

ooo0CM

0CM

CM

CDCCOJZ

1 2

2-T

etr

ach

loro

e

<-

••-COen

CMf^

CM

CM

O

CM^~

m

CT>

CO

COCMO

•r-

cr>CM

O

0

o1-

CO_jX

<

O —9i ro0> o

s0)

_l

ZJc

c0

?"c0)ocoo

<

in

T3

ro

LUn

— >

"CD

co~z.IIZ)

o.0COcgTo

cCDO

8T)

EV>

LUII

LU

cgro

§Couni

~CLErow

QnD

<uoQO

CD

X

0)

"5toa

-oCD-oro

CO

ro

~t±b

oC/lIDCD(DOXCD

CD

II

ro

C

±^

uOJ

Oto

CD<DOXQ)

OJ

_Q

roCD

CJ

n

Oto"O

8OXCD

0)

"ro•ii^

a>JD

sa.Q.

ro

o

2

COCM

OQI-

Page 67: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-i Oro O- ro

c c c

O

CJ11<;OJ

CD

CDXoCDfDCLl/i

O

:>

o

o>

53

C/)IT0)Q.1)Q.-^

t/JC

!/T

T>x0T>

Q.

zcoooCD

Z)C"O

<D~<

CO

rjIIOQ

Q.

COCJ

3"OT>

0OZJoQ13

QJ

5

mMrny

ZJ

X

lT1

on

cpn

CJ

oD

QJcrO

0>

zrCDotucrQJ

O

Cn

OZJ

CLCD

CDO

t_l <

mETCJ

TJ"Q.

•BJ)

~

JO

"Z)CD

CDOCDCL

roo

O5O

O

X

_l

oCD<c/~^CO

enen

i>.-tx

COo-gCO

COCOenCD

1

.fc.enCD

.)>CD

Oroen

^-*N.r^

ro

3n

o

T>

0,

D

ro

roo

rooooo

-z.3>

o

C

o

C

o

C

enroC

enen

C

— *o

C

ro

C

roen

C

o

C|

rZJ

oonienzen

0)

c

cc

crcc

ZJ*

o

C

o

C

o

C

enro

C

enen

— *o

C

ro

C

CD

en

o

C

, — i2a!ozrO

£T)Z)en

en

wO0o

1

en

o

C

o

C

0

(Z

enro

C

OJen

C

— *•

0

C

ro

C

roen

C

O

c

-"->r-^

nzro

rozr^J

"n

en

ro0oo0

enoo00

Z}>

o

c

o

C

0

C

enro

C

enen

C

— *O

C

ro

C

NJ

en

C

1

o

C

_

o^co2T>-3D

cr

c^cc

rv.

c;

en

O

C

o

C

CO

^

CO0oCO

roo0

cucr

CO

roQ)

roencu

~*jenCD

O

C

1 QCO

— 1

rvCozrOOrozroZJ

^o

rooo0o

ono0oo

I>

Ii

CO-tl.

0

C

i

CO

ro

ooQJ

Lo0QJ

COen

CO-gOQJ

-J0=

Q>

0

K

[3

2c

izQZJCD

C

2>

Z>

Z>

-^e-

coo

o

C

CO

ro-goo

COen

o

COro

o

C

—> |

} ^

K

COZJooCJD~5a>

(— .

roc§o

onOO0O

^>

o

d

o

c1

o

c

.CD0

CU

kroocu

— •*o

C

ro-j

-N

c_

O

C

5<T

r§5Ctl

rj

K.

40000

ro

CD

CJcr

o

C

o

C

->iCO

cuCJ

enCO

c_

a)CT

^g

enenQJCT

-)>CO

Q)CT

O

c

>Z>1 —

—1m

CD5

Q§ro

CD

CO

0t — r ~n

? 2 oCD_ ^ O

"O

z:«—«i— »• -j00 m

§

z~^im§iz§~ im5en

Z§~gm

CD

z<<;^gm5cb

Z

~g

2mO

-z.5-g2m

>

•z.

~j2m

CD

-z.~--J

m

ro>

Oo

<lfooQ.

OO »> 5

w

CD

0 C/0) C

IiO «/

Page 68: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

w_lX

0)r-

(/> O ^7

3 ° 3-t: *? wS-JS »3 n» —

C/) Q n>

"S » <O £•o « o

l!gZ 3

O

CD

JDCO

inUJ

ri

-z.

tUJ

l-i-z.

LJJ

r--.

•z.

CM

UJ

N.

•z.

o_Z)QCOCOi

UJ

N-

zCDCO

LJJ2

I

CDCM

LU

?

1

Q.

Q 2 "CD

Sll0

ro

g

CN

0

i

AN

ALY

TE

Z)

o

Z>

o

Z)

in

Z>

o

Z>

o

Z>

0

no

CM

OOOo

CM

CM

inyl

Chl

onde

>

Z)

o

Z>

o

Z>

m

p

o

Z)

o

z>o

Z)

O

z

oooom

0o0oCM

oo

0>cCDf—

ans

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oetl

^z;

D

o

Z)

o

or-

Z)

o

D

O

Z)

o

D

o

in

2

§

Z

ro"o

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e(l

'-

nc

Z)

o

CO

CD

Z)

0

Z)

o

Z)

o

3o

-z.

oo00in

ooooCM

o

CDC

s 1

2 D

ichl

oroe

the

o

Z)

o

Z)

o

roCMin

Z)

o

3

<DCM

O

Z>

O

Z)

o

m

ooooCM

O0

in

richl

oroe

then

e

\-

z>0

Z>

o

Z)

in

^o

Z)

o

Z)

o

Z)

o

-z.

o0ooin

o0ooCM

in

CD

1 2

Tric

hlor

oeth

an

*-

D

o

Z)

o

^

^?

Z)

o

D

o

Z)

o

Z)

o

in

0oom

o0o

in

etra

chlo

roet

hene

H

Z)

0

Z)

o

Z)

in

Z)

o

Z)

o

Z>

o

Z)

o

z

o0in

0oo

oo

hlor

oben

zene

o

Z)

o

ID

o

Z>

m

— \

o

Z)

0

Z)

o

Z)

o

Z

o0ooCM

OCM

CM

CDCra

1 2

2 T

etra

chlo

roe

*-

CT1

in

CDCM

o

o0

So

Q

ncen

trat

lons

in u

g/L

8—<

3TDCDt)0)CDa:no:

3toQ)

n

Dn-

dete

ct

J= E

stim

ate

"Z.iiZ)

the

calib

ratio

n lim

n

OJ>o.0ro

timat

ed

conc

entr

atio

n

wLUII

LLJ

cO

ro

uted

sam

ple

conc

entr

DnO

y}H)>O!

0.z:c

CD0

QOCC-D0)0)OXCDin

~5toCD

IDCD•oJZ0"

ro

£o

OCO-oQ)0)OXCD

CD

^ra^>IICD

T)

0>

bCN

§OenT3CDCDOXCD

CDj3T3>

II

-0

racu

alup

exc

eeds

GW

-3 c

i

>iiu

Not

app

licab

le

ii<z

COCN|O CM

rg So cslQ i;I- -<r

Page 69: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-+ Oro o

Q O =

O Q

a>

Xr~CO

co o m c > -• O I ^ : H O ^ - <

£ P ™ Z g ro t 3 r" S - c 3 tO c — o ^ r o O C J . — 1 0 ^ 0 - " ^

3 § £ a 2 H ^ ? g " g ° o fo r~S „ re 2 - 2 ^ " ^ o 2 ^ 5 § 0 = :c u - n ^ _ > _ ) T > r e g ; £ - ° 0 £~ zi _ o — o ^ 3 p D 9 — =>•w -8 £ ~ = < j n > r e o r e o ^ oo — 5 c_ => Oo = > = ? i> 3 -ix n > ^ i | J > X ^ re ^ — ^ oo o a - °° ^ ^ " "•o X - ^ m ^ : W T I ^ ^ ~g § ^ » c 3 " 3 2 -^ O O J - . J U J C J D- r ) r ^ ^ ' l J I ^ ^> ZT ^o s § s ro

D S a. So o e5" ^o § o o _, _,J -f, £ r j o e n e n i - ' e - o r x .u _ ?L o — > o

r r> _i r i 'o ^ fo< S " r ) 0 0 O O J O Z °S — _, r ^ X X o o c ' e o r o« ? o § § 8 ° o o

5 2 . r o , ^ e n r o i e n j ^n r e o e n i i ' o o o - . o o

a o o x o o o e o o=; ^ O O > < O O O > 0 0d g 0 ^ O O O 0 0

re

> > < " > u i > 3 > M

,^ c o c o c o c o c o c o e n ^ ^

- c c e c ? c ? ° " &

e n o o o o o ^ ^ o — k

o -> ro CDC C C C C C

-^ CO CO CO ^O — C O C O

-U 0 o ^- - C C C C D C C

cr

_. CO CO CO to ^§ £, C O C O

O ^ - ' - ^ ^ o ^ - D - ^ ^

S c c c c g . " c c

^ ^ ^ ^ _ ^ 0 0 0 _ x _ >^ o o o o ^ ^ t ^ o o— o — ro^ C C C C ^ ^ ^ C C

- k - x ^ ^ O O O ^ ^° O O O O ^ ^ N > 0 0

^ C C C C ^ ^ ^ C C

_ . - - - - - ° CO^ | O O C O N ; > * - ^ c o r o

,„ 01 -^ CO 0 [u^ C C C C ^c r

o o o o o o o o o

C C C C C C C C C

AN

AL

YT

E

CD

O5ro

OgCO

O

?i §<5_ g D

Z

m

z5:

m

1

§

1

1

CD

-z.

Iro

Z

1ro

OCTJ

Z

1ro03

Z

1COro

-H

cn

3

o s i0 ? o> $ a.5 3 cr^j iJ L.

W ' T.— . >0 cc => 3

<Q "* o

-C r^ c/1

D

Page 70: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

wX

0)r

03

£ D)

.? S(A

D. S3

•oOO

oz

roD^.£155coO

^-\roc

OO>

(O

ro

o

§?

•z.

m

gS

1

^^

1

mt

|

|

^

K

CO

^

-z.

ro

2

-z.

Q.

D ^ "oi

§ s ®O

CO

oC\l

O

1

CD

AN

ALY

TE

Z5

0

D

O

o

Do

Z)0

Z)

o

ID

o^

CM

OOO0•t

CM

CM

OJ-g

O

c>

Zi

o

Z)

o

ID

O

Z)

0

Z)

o

Z)

0

Z)

o*~

z

ooooin

oo0oCM

OO

0>cCDr~

s-1

2-D

ichl

oroe

tl

cCO

Z)

o

ID

o

CDCO

ID

0

ID

o

Z)

o

~>enCD

o

m

*

~z_

•z.

~2.0

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene(

l

CM

T-

ID

O

Z>

o

CO

ID

o

ID

o

ID

o

3

CD

O

Z

OOoom

ooo0CM

0

cuc

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

e

eno

ID

O

Z)

o

roi —CM

Z)0

ID

o

Z)

o

— 3

mo

m

ooooCM

O0ro

in

hlor

oeth

ene

o

1—

ID

o

Z>

o

ID

o

-,

0

ID

o

ID

o

Z)

oT~

Z

ooooin

o0ooCM

m

a>ro

OO

o

CMT-

T-

Z)

o

Z)

o

Z)

c

Z>

o

Z)

o

Z)

0

Z)

oT~

m

o0oin

oooro

in

•ach

loro

ethe

ne

~Zi—

ID

o

Z)

o

Z)

0

Z)

o

Z)

o

ID

o

Z)

o't~-

Z

ooin

ooo

oo

jrob

enze

ne

_IZ

O

ID

0

Z)

o

Z)

0

Z)

0

ID

o

Z)

o

Z)

oT~

Z

ooooCM

OCM

CM

CCOXI

2 2-

Tet

rach

loro

e

,-i-

in

,CM

COOO

~S01-

Q

oin

itrat

ions

in u

g/L

8c8—<

R =

Rej

ecte

d

ZJto£

atec

t, J=

E

stim

ated

co

IID

ie c

alib

ratio

n li

§oJD

ted

conc

entr

atio

n a

ro

.— .LUII

LU

co

sam

ple

conc

entr

at

-oV^D

Buo

(/)"CD>a>CLZJCra0)oQO(T

o>80)CO

CO

-D111•or:to

CO

cu

o

OCO

TU0)CDOX<1>0)

"ro>llre

ro

0}

bCM

§Ow

TD0>CDOX<I1

CD

"ro>uJD

roQ)

oro

O

CO-o%0XcuCD

"ro>MCJ

CDn

8Q.Q.ro

"o^~II

<^-z.

COCMO CM

Q CI- •<»•

Page 71: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oo o m c

O -r £ x

CJ

T.

T>

X

?CD

CD<r*

M

Z}

5

CO

CD

aXO

CDa.

O<f

O

3

a>CL

QC/lC

OXo0oQ.

OOoT>

cCD*CL

r)

CJ

3

CD~

OOZ3OCDZ3

s5

i.

j-?^oC

oCDD

OJ

O

CJcro

O

<rooXco

1 1 ._ 2 T

ptra

rhlo

roe

tha

ne

ro

roo

roO0o

2>

oc

o

oc

0

c

o

c

o

C

0

C

O

ooLTT>

r-i

T

O

oor- 1

en0o

2>

O

C

o

C

o

c

0

c

o

C

O

c

0

C

Tetra

chlo

roe

the

ne

^n

^00oo

01ooo

01

0

c

o

c

o

c

o

C

O

C

O

C

O

c

N,

— !

ti

03z>a

~n

rooo0o

enoo00

-z.>

o

c

o

c

0

c

o

C

o

C

o

c

o

C

Tr ch

loro

eth

en

c

>_n

COoo

rooo00

en

oc

oi^

o

c

o

c

o

C

o

C

o

C

s

rw

O

Q

Q

£O:131>

-J0

rooooo

eno00o

2>

rxj0

o

C

0

C

o

C

o

C

o

c

oc

1 2 D rh

loro

e'n

en

o(to

tal)

2>

2>

2>

-gen

r-o

oC

o

C

o

C

o

C

0

C

0

C

.13

j-

n

OT>

CD^303

O0

roo0oo

(_no00o

2>

O

C

o

c

0

c

0

C

o

C

o

C

0

C

<^

r

(-1

r

rv.

-t*o0oo

ro

o

C

o

C

0

C

0

C

o

C

o

C

o

C

AN

AL

YT

E

(Dg

CDgro

O

CO

On ™ 7°? !» 05. c O

-a

-z.

-g

S

a>

•z.

i

1(b03

oinstream 3

^.O-stream

2

•o

<SQJ

-JTB

012301

z

TB

012401

Oo

O S 5° f f o

? s s»<" 2t c

W • T.—~ KJ cC O T

•9. 3 c

Page 72: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

C/5_lX

CM

Q§O

<ut

oro

«Q. «"- •*-•3 re -

c/) Q 5

ro

JDro

2 p< o

CD oQ- CM

£ Sh-

O

OCMOCO1 —N-

•z.

o

CO

omH

§~z.

5inoCMOCDh-h-

5~z.

oo>CM

OCD

|

OinCM

oCO

"Z.

O-

Q g "o3

<3

iO

IS!

(5

gO

31A

1V

NVHt r

Z)

o

ID

0

Z>

o1

ID

o

Z)

o

3,0

CM

OOOO

CM

CM

OJ-O

O

O

C

>

Z)

o

0

ID

o

Z)

o

Z)

o

D

0

2.

ooooin

ooooCM

O0

Q)C

2-D

ichl

oroe

the

i/jro

ID

o

ID

o

Z)

o

ID

0

Z)

0

Z)o

£

2-z

'. '

hlor

oeth

ene(

tot

oQCM

"-

Z)

O

ID

O

ID

o

Z)

O

ID

0

ID

0

-z.

oooom

0oo0CM

o

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

CM

wo

Z)

o

0

Z>

o

Z)o

-j

o

Z)0

in

ooooCM

ooCO

m

oeth

ene

0

0

i—

o

o

Z)

o

ID

o1

•D

0

Z)0

Z

oooom

ooooCM

in

nchl

oroe

than

e

CMr-

T-

z>o

o

Z)

o

Z)

0

Z)

0

Z)o

in

oom

oooro

in

loro

ethe

ne

oro"5(—

Z)

o

ID

o

Z)

o

ID

0

Z)

0

ID

0

<

oo

ooo

oo

lenz

ene

-LJ0

}rO

Z)

0

ID

o

Z)

o

Z)0

Z)

0

Z)0

<

ooooCM

OCM

CM

0)Cro

•Tet

rach

loro

eth

CM"

•<-

COOO

3ol-

or-

c!>cin

8<

CO>

TD

1en

"5to*-"o

"ra|CO

LJJ

II

1co

Z)

the

calib

ratio

n lim

it

>JDro

g'rocDOc

8

IToIDII

LU

cgro

e

scoo

"5.Ero10

•DV

anQ

t/>Q>

-2a.DCro0)oQOa:

inX

2

to

"O

J^in

roJD

1OU)

TD

exce

e

0)

M

OJ

TO

0)±±

UCNJ

5O10

exce

e

2

II

JD

5£Ho

$Oto

excc

e-

re

no

0)

'ro

"o.Q.ro

'cj-z.n

Z

00CMO CM

a i;\— •*

Page 73: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

O)r

(/> O)

CO Q ro

"§ » <0 ro O

2151 i

oO

JDCO

^

LU

5•z.

CD

LU

-z.

T

LU

-z

o

§LUN-

Z

O)

mfc~z

CO

C;z

or

CO

z.CO~*7COr-.

Z.

o

CO

§~z.

Q.

Q g ai0 ro >cc 51 _j

o

CO

5

CM

0

i

AN

ALY

TE

z>CO

CD

-Oro

CM

^>

O

cc

COin

Z>

o

CO

CM

CD

Z>

O

Z>

o

_QCO

in

CM

0ooo

CM

CM

0)•g

0

c>

Z)

OO

cr

CM

_,

O

oro

Z)

0

-,

••-ro

Z>

o

— ,

0

Z>

o

z

ooooin

ooooCM

oo

0)c0)(—

2-D

ichl

oroe

tl

wcro

om

oCM

oom

oo0'M

Z>

o

oo

o

Z>

0

CO

m

z.

z.

•z.

~3o

;hlo

roet

hene

(l

CJ

QCM

••-

CO

0

••-

CO

oCO

rooom

CO

ooCO

Z>

o

ro00

Z>

o

Z)

o

ro

Z

ooooin

ooooCM

o

cz

-Dic

hlor

oeth

e

CM

W0

rooCO

oCM

_oCO

oo1

CO

0ro

Z)

0

ror-

z>o

Z)

0

CO

o

in

o0ooCM

ooCO

in

roet

hene

Cf

o

H

Z>

CO

cr

Z)

m

Z)

o

Z)

oin

Z>

0

Z)T —CO

Z)

0

Z)

o

Z>

o

Z

oooom

ooooCM

in

V

'nch

loro

eth

an

t—CM

*-

Z)

CO

Cn

^

Z)

O

Oin

Z)

o

D

--CO

Z)

o

Z)

O

Z)

o

in

ooom

oooCO

in

iloro

ethe

ne

CJCO

•jjji—

Z)

CO

en

Z)

in

Z)

0

oin

Z)o

Z)

•<-ro

Z)

o

Z)

0

inCD

-z.

Oom

ooo

oo

benz

ene

oQ

JZ

O

Z)

CO

CD

in

Z)

o

Z)om

Z)0

Z)

--CO

Z)

o

Z)

0

=>o

z

o0ooCM

OCM

CM

0)Cro.c

-Tet

rach

loro

e

CM

CM

*-

OCD-tf

sCD

OOCM

COCO

CM

CM

CDin

in

CO

wO0

S01-

CO

X

CM>

<D

O

_J

3

C

COCg

Is§oo=*.

<

"o

o:«_r

U)

G)

To

LUII

— 5

t3

'S"9o

iiZ)

ie c

alib

ratio

i

i3

$Erocg

d co

ncen

tra

To

LUnLU

cg

Is"c0)

.am

ple

cone

in•oCDz>

QIIO

to0)>

-CP

Q.ZJ

ro0)oQOrr0)0)oX(DCO

"5a)

X)CO

_rzCO

ro

.2o

OtoO!a>oXa>o>Z3

"ro

nro

ro

5o

CM

C3

TZJ0)

sX0)

"ro

nJD

i•g0

OUl

8OX03

0)ura

" ^IIo

-Q

3Q.Q.

03

O

II

<^z

CM "O CMo r;

Page 74: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Zj>ll/q

CJ

"U

0OJcrro

oll

CJLl"T>T>xce

ed

s

OsCJo£CD

5

crH

CJ~c0)

mxcee

ds

0

roo

ft>

DJ

a)n

c"01

CDxcee

ds

O

o

CD

CJ

COzrCJa

Q

roC/J

7>•DXo1)O-

OOoo>CL)

•5S"rocn

OMgcTro

cnCJ

3

OoZJ0

ZJ

3oZJ

mnm

ZJ

CO

ro*0-

oooro

oD

COcrO

rozfrooCJ_

c^£1oZJ

Cll

Z.oZJ

CLro3"o

Mm01

3CO

roCL

roc_

73

TJroCDc^roCL

>—

8j

OCD13

-at ons

c(ID

r~

roo

D

ro

xr~CO

-H0

0OE/J

encr>

enk

en

0

CO

CO

O)o0

CO

-•— >ro2 T

etra

chlo

ro

zrCJZJro

rv.

roo

roooo0

-z.

o

C

o

C

o

C

o

C

roCD

C

CDO)

C

o(Z

CO

C

o

c

ozrc"o

be

nze

np

oo

oo0

eno0

-z.

o

C

o

C

o

C

o

C

roCD

C

CDCD

C

oc

CO

<Z

o

c

-H2CJch

loro

eth

en

e

en

COooo

enooo

en

o

C

o

Cc_

0

C

0

C

roCD

C

CDCD

C

O

C

CO

C

o

C

-i—it\jT

richlo

roe

tha

ZJro

en

rooooo

cnoooo

-2L

o

o

C

o

C

0

c

roCD

C

O>CD

O

C

CO

0

C

-1Qzrlo

roeth

ene

en

COoo

ro0ooo

en

o

o

C

O

c

OJ{y

^0

COcr

ro0o

cr

oC

COCO

o

nS:

— *2 D ch

loro

eth

roZJro

--j0

o0oo

ooo0

-z.

CO

o

c

o

C

— *CD

OOO

CJ

roCOo0

CD

O

C

COocu

00-J

->ronhch

loro

eth

en

e

o51

Z.

'Z.

•z.

-Ji

COCD

O

C

o

C

-^

— J

_too

roenoo

o

C

COo

COCD

-^y

•Sl

1 2 Dich

loro

e

roZJro

o0

rj0ooo

enoo0o

-^

od

o

C

o

c

o

C

CD

O

OP

O

c

00-J

0

c

f3~^_C

hlo

ride

'-

^

o

0o

rj

CD

cr

o

C

c

C

0

c

roCD

C

CD

COcr

o

C

CDro

COcr

CO

0)cr

AN

AL

YT

E

CD

ro

0

CO

0

<" S cro_ g D

J» r^

z7Jm

•z.^ §D -Tl

g

-z.

~^m

en

1"m

•CO

-z.

m$CD

~Z.

um

o

-z.

m

•z.

m

cn

-Icrc

0

cn(/)

cCO

Q.cr

:•

IP

Page 75: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

0)

m us• 3v> O

c3td>Q.

(/> O

O)3cs

toro .

T3oO

ro_ c« <ro O5 OT: >c3O

ro

op

LLJSN-gZ

inUJ

r^-S-^

tLUSh-

§Z

CO

LUSr-

5Z

CXJ

UJSr^

§Z

CDCO

LU2

§Z

CDCM

LU2

<:z

<CM

LU2

gZ

Q.Q ? "50 ro >CC S %

0

CO

O

CM

0

0

AN

AL

YT

E

JDre

LOJ3

ID0

Z)o

IDLO

CM

D

O

13

0

Z)

o

ID

o

CM

OOOO•t

CM

CM

Vm

ylC

hlon

de

•<j-CM

3

O

ID

O

3m^M

IDo

3o

30

ID

0

<Z

ooooLO

0oooCM

oo

tra

ns-

1 2-D

ichlo

roeth

ene

oCDCO

D

o

Z)

o

CDCM

ID

o

ID

o

Z)

0

Z>

0

LOf^

<

<z

<

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene(

tota

l)

ro

o'OCO

ID

0

n>o

CDCM

Z)

o

Z)

o

o

Z)

0

<

ooooLO

ooooCM

oh-

cis

1 2

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

CD

O^t-

ID

O

Z)o

CO

o>CO

o

D0

IDo

ID0

LO

OoooCM

OOCO

LO

Tn

chlo

roe

the

ne

Z)o

Z)o

^>o

ID

inCM

ID

O

Z)

O

D

0

Z5

O

<Z

0oooLO

0oooCM

LO

1 1

2 T

nchl

oroe

than

e

ID

o

ID

o

Z)o

ID

LO

CM

Z)

0

z>o

Z)

o

Z)

o

LO

ooom

oooCO

LO

Tetr

achl

oroe

then

e

Z5

o

z>o

IDo

Z)LOCM

Z)

O

Z)o

ID0

Z)

0

<z

ooLO

ooo

oo

Chl

orob

enze

ne

ID

o

Z)

o

IDo

Z)inCM

Z)o

Z)0

Z)o

Z)0

<

ooooCM

OCM

CM

1 1

2 2-

Tetr

achl

oroe

than

e

inCDLO

LO

wOO

~mo

1—

COI

X

CM

<Q

oCO

CD go 2a ra

§ In 3

_J

c

(ACO

'ro

c

8coo

<

_."5VICD

X)

fo

"toLUII

—5

Oaj^5

o

n

0).£

0)

10)

d co

ncen

tratio

n

-X"roE

LUII

LU

co

"TO

ampl

e co

ncen

tr

§D

DitQ

dZ)cCDO

QOcc

CD0)OXQ)

"5c/)CD

CD-aCO

C/3

raCD

o

OCO

CDCD0XCDCDZJTO>II

CO

TO

JD

OCM

OCO

CDCDOXCDCDZJro>M.0

raCD

to

O

T3CDOOXCDCD

75>no

0)-Q

8Q.Q_

ra

"o

II

1Z.

COCMO CM

CM SO CN

O ^

Page 76: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

> IIco o m c >

•"• H_. oro o

< <

S 3

;=; C <? <? j>

CTft)

O

Oa

O

IIro

o

O — F;

I c?

— iq

0O

cnro

CDCOCo

O000

2CO

_i->ro2

Tp

trarh

loro

e

zrtuZJm

ro

ro0

ro0ooo

Z

o

c

CO00

C

CO

C

o

C

0

C

0

C

oC

o

cr

ozrOobenzene

oo

o0o

cno0

Z

o

C

COcn

CO

C

o

C

0

C

o

ocr

oc

-HO

CiJrhlo

rop

the

ne

<•"CO0oo

cnoo0

cn

o

C

CD

CO

C

CO.tx

O

C

oC

O

c

oc

0

C

_j.-»roT

richlo

roe

tha

n

en

roooo0

Cnoooo

z

o

c

COCO

CT

CO

C

0

C

oC

O

c

o

C

0

C

— IoZJo

roe

thp

nf

en

CO0o

o0oo

J1

o

C

roCO0

cn0

toCT

o

C

rv>CO

o

C

o

C

0

C

ocr

— *roOozro"O£-ZT

Z3CU

0

ro0ooo

cnooo

z

COro

CDO

tu

rootu

o

c

CO

*

c

0

C

ocr

_iroOich

loro

pth

pn

efl

Q

QJ

?

?

I

en

CO

ro

N>CD0

roo

o

c

COen

0

C

o

C

0

C

—ZJ.0

1 2 Dichloroetl

0)Z3

Oo

rooo00

enoooo

Z

o

C

OO

CO

CO

C

o

C

0

C

O

cr

oc

oc

<5~ -^h

lon

de

rx.

K.

OOo0

f-

ro0)CT

COCO

toCT

CO

0

c

ro-J0>cr

o

C

oC

0

c

AN

AL

YT

E

CJ

0

ro

O

CO

O

? § §2. g o

Z

^mCD

1

1

1

CD

Z

5ro

1'

S

CD

•z.

ICOCO

1s<ECO

1

S

^CO

Oo

o s s° «• oJ* 2 Q.» o c^-< SI |<2. 01 HW ' T.

•c !2|(D W c

-C D oc s:

Page 77: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

(Vro "i/5 O

cCM

o> « —0.5^3 ra (/) Q ™

O £o ra Oi s oIr

oO

CO

Ero0)^fi

OQ

mO)

g5

§~z.

CO

5Zar~.§

ON-

^

g~z.

CDr^-

§

§

<r-

?

1"-

|

7-M

W-4

B

5

7-M

W-4

A

?.

Q.

Q |2 o0 ro >CC ® i

O

ro

O

CM

O

i

AN

ALY

TE

z>

o

ID

o

ID

O

IDo

IDo

z>CMCM

ID

O

Z>

o

CM

OOOO•t

CM

CM

Vm

ylC

hlon

de

IDo

z>o

Z>

o

Z>

o

Z>

o

Z>

CMCM

Z>

o

33

O

<Z.

0oooin

ooooCM

oo

tran

s-1

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

o

IDo

o>

IDo

Z)o

r~CD

ID

o

Z>

o

inh-

<

<

<

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene(

tota

l)

o

Z)o

CT>

ID

o

z>o

mCD

ID

O

Z>

O

<

o0ooin

ooo0CM

0!•--

cis-

1 2-

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

z>o

z>o

Z>

o

z>o

=)o

z>CMCM

Z5

O

z>o

in

0oooCM

ooro

m

Tnc

hlor

oeth

ene

z>o

Z>

o

ID

0

Do

I

ID

CMCM

Z>

O

Z5

o

<

o0ooin

ooooCM

in

1 1

2-T

nchl

oroe

than

e

IDo

Z>

o

—3ID

o

Z5

0

ZJ

o

ZD

CMCM

— >z>0

^>ID

o

un

oooin

oooro

in

Tet

rach

loro

ethe

ne

z>o

Z>

o

Z>

o

D

o

Z>

0

Z)CMCM

Z3

O

ID

0

<Z

0oin

ooo

1

Chl

orob

enze

ne

z>o

Z>

o

ID

0

Z>

o

Z)

o

Z)

CMCM

ID

O

Z)o

<

ooooCM

OCM

CM

1 1

2 2-

Tet

rach

loro

etha

ne

o

=II

l-~<o

I

«OO

3o

I—

ncen

trat

ions

in u

g/L

8—.

t, R

= R

ejec

ted

vali

3(/>

*-

1re

t)S15

cQ

II

Z)

the

calib

ratio

n lim

it

03

o-Q

timat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

a

toLUII

LU

co

uted

sam

ple

conc

entr

al

QnD

Q.

C

0>oQOQ;0)

8X0)

tf)CD

ro

00

roQ)

b

o"OOJ

SXa)

DT!

II

CQ

CO

.2o

CM

0

lfl13CU0>oXCD<PZJro

n.0

ro

-ffi

o

0ton8OX0)

CD13CD

II

O

Not

app

licab

le

n<^~z.

CO

X

CM

Q

O

COCMO CM

(M SO CMD C

Page 78: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

ao

Z>n7*

O

CJ-o"O

scrT>

oH

CJlue exceeds G\

CO

o

oCO

crn

COlue exceeds G\

^o

3|

OJ

CO

colue e

xcee

ds

G\

^o—CD

CJ

COzr

CL

Q.

CD•JiC

CDXot>Q.

Tl

0aoT>

Z)C~oCD"<TJC1

On0p"ted sam

ple cor

oCT>

50)

o3

mnm=r-m

ate

d concent

zj^-*oZ)

MCT

Q

ft>

8CT

CII

o

ClfD

0

L_

II

m•~*3

"TJQ.

C^*

Tl

n-n

(U

>

O

^

ren

trat cm

s m L

nr-

K>ro: T

etra

chlo

roe

U

To

tal V

OC

s

COziI!

r J

roo

O

o

^ro

X

ro

ro-1

a)nzrg3o>

coZlTJ

r J

roo

rooooo

-z>

o

C

o

C

o

c

o

C

0

C

o

C

oc

Ch

loro

be

nze

ne

oo

o0o

CnC

Z>

O

c

o

C

o

C

o

C

o

C

0

C

0

C

Te

trach

loro

pth

pn

p

Qi

CO0oo

enoo0

en

o

C

o

c

o

C

o

C

o

C

o

C

0

C

1 1 2 Trich

loro

eth

an

e

01

ro0CJo0

eno0oo

2>

oc

o

c

oc

oc

o

c

o

c

oc

Tr ch

loro

eth

en

t

en

CJo0

roo0oo

en

O

d

O

C

oc

o

C

oc

o

C

oc

c s 1 2 D ch

loro

eth

en

e~-i0

rooooo

enoo0

Z>

0

c

0

c

0

c

oc

oc

0

C

0

C

1 2 Dich

loro

eth

en

e(to

t^l)

>

z>

z>

->jen

0

c

oc

o

C

o

C

o

C

0

C

0

C

Iran'; 1 2

Dich

loro

eth

en

e

o0

ro0oo0

01oooo

z>

oc

o

c

o

c

o

C

o

C

O

c

0

c

Vm

ylCn

ion

de

h

r^

*>oooo

ro

o

C

o

C

o

C

0

C

o

C

0

c

0

C

AN

AL

YT

E

CD

Ogro

CDgCO

OC ro ;o< !» 05. c 0

-o

sQ.(n

3tu3ro

C•o

SuB

70-b- —D

BL

AN

K

/18/0

1

Zl-&. —H TCD CD

°5Z7;

H

*. 2PB

LA

NK

/20

/01

HCD

gMCT>O

HCDO-Ur\>~-lo

O

oo

If« :0 21 ^

> ? S.w O C"

u c*•* TW 0

w . ^

3

x:V)

ro(Q V)£ c

0 ^Q) <B

3.n>

Page 79: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CO_)X

Q

O

0)tro3

OT3C3

Q)

Q. 23 ro

(/) Q

I/) O>T- 3<N —• tn

'in

0) <lre O5 O

"O ^^c3O

CD

CM

"c on> en j^

H

•*• -r—

SS ?5CO tN

H

5

" * •*0CO

'? a.._

:?'1?** 0

^ i. ' oi

•$£'

'T uj

3)o

ID

0

D

0

CM

0OOO

CM

CM

/IChl

onde

c>

3)

o

Z)

0

Do

z

0oo0in

oo0oCM

oo

0)c0)f—

s-1

2-D

ichl

oroe

tl

c

-b

ID ID

o o

U Z)

0 0

ID ID

O O

£ 2

o< §^- o

in

o< 8^ o

CM

< 0~Z. f~~

"roP g

Dic

hlor

oeth

ene(

l1

2-D

ichl

oroe

the

CM J;T- O

23

o

o

o

in

oo0oCM

o0

in

hlor

oeth

ene

oi—

~j

o

^o

o

-z.

ooooin

ooooCN

m

IV

2-Tn

chlo

roet

han

,-"T-

-)

O

ID

O

o

m

oooin

oooro

in

achl

oroe

then

e

"Sh-

-}o

^>0

D0

z

ooin

o0o

oo

xobe

nzen

e

2o

33

0

^0

D0

z

ooooCM

0CM

CM

Q)Cra-C

2,2-

Tetr

achl

oroe

,-"*-"

oo

ao1-

cent

ratio

ns in

ug/

L

coon:

= R

ejec

ted

vali

K.

30)

T3

n-de

tect

, J=

Est

imat

e

o

n

calib

ratio

n lim

it

0.c

ora

mat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

COUJM

cO

7u

ted

sam

ple

conc

entr

an

CO

a.czro0)oQ0ct

0)

sxQJ

"5to0)

ro-C

ro0)

b

gCOT3<P

8X0)0)13ro

ii

ro_QJ

bCNJ

OtoT3Q)

8XQ)

OJ;Dro

"

OJ

QJ

b

0v>"D

SOX0)

a>

ro"^\\

•Jot a

pplic

able

£—II

*x

COCMO (N

CM 9O CM

D C(— -"t

UJ Q CO ro .0

Page 80: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

V•e

<-• 3w O

toQ.3 ra 15

V) Q c

CN

re

o -SI o

W

o

^ro

r-

UJ

z

CD

LU

Z

LU

Z

O

LU

Cft

m

z

QOce

tDOi

£^

Z

5

03h*>

§

CO

mr-i-

1

o

CD

j^

|

Q.

C. Sra gCD i

O

CO

§CN

O

C3

UJ

<

<

0

in

Z>0

in

3

O

LO

O

IT)

_,0

in

Z>o

_,

0

in

^oin

-,

oin

<Z

oooCO

o0o0

ooCD

CDC

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

•<-

oLO

3oLO

ro

^

oLO

z>oin

ID

oun

_,

oLO

ZJoin

ro

OOCD

in

oooCO

ooooro

in

CDc

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

T-

0

30in

T~

oin

_,

0LO

Z)oin

Z)0m

ZioLO

3oin

<

0

0

o0oo

ccc

2-D

ichl

orob

enze

^~

0

LO

CO

O

LO

_,0

LO

Z)

oin

Zi

oLO

CO

o>

in

oinro

I

o0oo

CDCCDN

2 4-

Tnc

hlor

oben

*-

z>CM

Z)

CM •'-

O)CM m

CN

Z)

CN

D

CM

ZI

CMi —

z. nCN CO

ZJ CO

CM ;£

—^4L.

OCO

z

T~

enta

chlo

roph

eno

otal

SV

OC

s

D- h-

CD

ra

CDt)CDCD

II

ce

in u

g/L

Est

imat

ed r

esu

II co

ncen

trat

ions

= N

on-d

etec

t, J=

< Z)

^

ECgro-Q

3

£

entr

atio

n ab

ove

=Est

imat

ed c

one

LU

conc

entra

tion

=Dilu

ted

sam

ple

D

w

0)

o.

raCDoQOrrCD

n

hade

d re

sults

ex<

w

ro

5

o

= V

alue

exc

eeds

ra

ro

oj0

CN

O

= V

alue

exc

eeds

_Q

ro

.2oro

O

= V

alue

exc

eeds

o

0)jQ

sQ.Q.raoZn<

CO_JX

CN

<Q

O

CO

'o

O CMQ :I- •*

Page 81: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Oo

z — — —

scrCD

o q

CD oT CT -i

g_

en

Ogo

-H ~O0 T>S S

a)CO o< 2c go St/> "O

2o^

-

z

ooO

Z

CO

t-

r-o

C

M

-

CO

C

_iK>

,

N3

C

hO

C

v

ro

C

_^rj-t-H~"ouoooNO

0

0

0ooo

enoo

COeno

eno

C

Cf

o

c

en0

C

enoc

eno

c

enoc

eno

C

eno

C

_if-o

6o^ooCT0>

hjT>

0)

croo

ooo0

COoo0

>

0

c

eno

C

en0

c

eno

c

enoc

enoC

eno

C

enoC

„.u6oIT

O

oCTOZ3MO^>Q

en

oo00

COooo

en

eno

Ce_

enO

en0

C

enoc

enoc

enoc

eno

C

eno

C

_iU-

6o^"

o"3CT

ZN0>

T

O0

oo0o

CDooo

-z.

eno

C

eno

C

en0

C

eno

C

enoc

enoc

eno

C

eno

C

-^

~2L

r~— tm

i

o

ro

CD

CO

O

5 § o~1 °z

rn5CO

Z

-vl

m

z

m

o

z

"7^m

en

Z§7^m

CD

z<r1m

<b

Z

i»m0

z<

m

K)

X

Page 82: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Or<u TO

•*-* 13w O ^J"O "$/) ^c T- -2-.3 c1^ ..0)Q. _

^s s

« "O5 §

oO

^DJDTO

o

C3

O O O Og

in in in ^

o o o om m m in

o o o oin in in m

o o oin in in

=3 Z)

O O O O CMin in in in T~

^) D ^o o oin uo in

12o

^ 12^> D

O O O Oto in in in

o o o o CMm m in m T~

o o oo o oo o ooo co co

o o o oo o o oo o o oo o o o

oo in10

OJ O> CD CDC C C N0) CD '

CD cu a> o•Q -Q -Q ko o o .2.p p p -Q _y_C _C JZ C

o o h-

tacl

oro

ph

el S

VO

Cs

,3 tal9 9 9 ^

CM OJ o> o^ i- Q_ h-

CO_lX

CMCO

II-

D

O

<o"o

_,^>3C

incg"ro"ccuocoo

<C

= R

ejec

ts

tr

0)

0)ro

LUM

—3

o0)0)

co

IIZ)

calib

ratio

i

0)

orocg

d co

ncen

tra

Si76EtoLUII

LU

Cgroi=co>ocooCDQ.

rotf)•ds"5QIIQ

1

Q.

rocuoQOrr

ults

exc

eed

10

S?•o0>•Dro.cCO

ro

b

O(ftTJCUCDOXCD0)3ro>nro

ro

oCM

0toTJ0)

8XQ>0)•3nj>n.0

ra

bCO

(3c/)

~O0)ooX0>

Q>13ro

no

o>_o

so.orao

-2LII

<~Z.

COCMO CM

Page 83: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

II<

oo o m=r ii ii

D rn< < a ^^ oTO O

o ^NJ O

hoCD

^ 0) CD CD CO^ X x x c"O O o O p;

O D Q

A) §

O 3

£ 3

CD

"CD

in

X

00

-1 T> -> -1 -• -*0 15 N> N> *> u.' , ,^ 3 ^ 0 0 0CO 0 — 1 0 0 0< 2 ^ - =r ~

O o y ° o 2O o ;=r o o oon -a X cr cr er

IT O CD CD CDCD CJ 3 z) 33 CD r*j N NO ZJ T) CD T>~ N 1} ID ZJ

CD T> cf T>

^, c> a-* S o e-i o

0 0 0

_» -i CJ ->^- O O O Oe- o o o o•*" o o o o

o o o o

.„ CD CD COCD £LJ 0 0 0o X o o o

0 0 0 0

7 " 7 7<r en #- en <;> o > >

_i en en en en^J o o o o

c c c c c

_x y, en en eno° o o o o

P c C C C•— ^- c_ c_ t_

ro _^CJ J 0 ^H ro ° M -»& c a -^ °

0) m

_k en en en en!~° O O O O

^ C C C C

_ k en en en enf° o o o oc: c c c c

_i „, en en eneo _i _A _x

<= r- C C C<— ^— t_ c_ c_

_i en en en en^ o o o o

C c C C C

_x en en en en-> o o o o

C C C C C

>

>i —-<—1m

C7^

O

ro

C7)

O

< 9> 0CD ^ Q

-z.

~^

mCD

-?.

-si

mcb

•z.

~?

I

•z.

1

^?ro

•z.-*45»§

-z.

I

gMCO

•z.5

gCJO3

-z.

" -

s

s

ucrCD

CO

^N,

o

C/) ^ O< 1" i

> ? Q.3 3 V )W. 1) C

(Q 5. Q.

^ .D «~ «•*•i) O>

,3."

Page 84: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CO

X

1_CDr

« 3co O ^J•o "5 ra

C ^ 3

•? ^ 7Tt • .12Q3 (AX CO CQ. 4-1 >>>

co-3 g

0 «o

o re i $ O* -n >0 ? COZ --J

O

CD

00

<OJ_dro1-

CO

§Sh-

^,>

Z

Oh~.

52r~I-<:

CDr-~

§2N-

Z

<1

$

li5

mf52ri-^>S

<tg5

^§Z

ce<CO

>2r-i.

Z

Q.

Q § a>O ra ga « 5

O

CO

O

(N

0

C5

AN

ALY

TE

Z)

om

Z)oin

Z)0

in

Z)oin

Doin

Z)

oin

Doin

<

oooCO

oooo

ooCD

3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne

*-

z> z>0 0

in in

D Z)O 0

m in

Z) D

0 O

in in

12 ^>0 0in m

Z> 3o oin in

3 D

0 0

in in

Z> Z>o oin in

in <

o oo oo oCO CO

o oo o0 0o oCO T-

om o

<o

4-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne2-

Dic

hlor

oben

zene

T- <-

Z) ^,

O ojin T-

Z) o

O CMm *~

Z) Z)

0 CNin 'r~

^> 30 c-j

in ^~

=> D0 oj

m ^~

z> ^O CM

m ^

^ Z)0 CM

in '-

0 rfm Sto Z

§ §

o0 rf0 S0 Z

oh-

2,4-

Tnc

hlor

oben

zene

enta

chlo

roph

enol

otal

SV

OC

s

<- a. i-

CD

^

5 IE cu 2» TO

^ ^ce —n 3a: CD- £

Z3 CDW >0) O^ r>•o n>in

II co

ncen

trat

ions

in

ug/L

= N

on-d

etec

t, J=

Est

imat

e

^Est

imat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

< Z> LJJ

cofo

=Dilu

ted

sam

ple

conc

entr

Q

to

SJa>Q.r>ro0)T5Q

hade

d re

sults

exc

eed

RO

\

w

ro

S

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-1 c

CO

COc0)

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-2 c

_Q

roJ5

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-3 c

i

o

A =

Not

app

licab

le

z

<Q

oin

COCMO (NCSJ SO CMQ C1- Tf

Page 85: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

OO

II <o c

aj 1)

crii<CJ

ce exceeds G\

<;roqnTD

cuII<ai

e exceeds G\,

<>

q

STCJ

C/)0)Q.CD

results exre

e

a.

OOoO>CiJ3C"O

0)<CO.C/l

O

OcCDQ.inCJ

3TJfDO0

O(D13

Q

D

mnm

lated roncenti

QJ

O!30)crO<0)

ITCT)

OCU

cr

or)

3

c >1 =

!§^ njntrationc; in L

detect J= E

s

o3u t~S>CL_1

Oyic

11

^0

offQ.

<OJcCD

H T) J

£j 13- 5J *"CO r. H

chlorobenzen

lorophpnol'D

Cs

CD

t ~^J

•7 °^ o> 0

0

g g

> s

_i enfo o

C c

_> enhj o

C c

_* enKJ o

C c

_. enho o

C c

-•

00zrlo

rob

en

zen

eO300

ooo0

oooo

>

eno

C

eno

C

en0

C

eno

c

-i£1.

6o

lorobenzene

en

LOOOO0

COooo

en

eno

C

eno

C

en0

C

eno

C

-.

Dr^lorobenzene

CT)OO

Oooo

CDooo

>

eno

C

eno

C

en0

C

eno

C

m

O^>

'^

Ol"N)

i6

o

<i § o•o

T4 '2 Jf"*s't>OJ « »H

g1

! ...;3^ C"5 «

s ' *'vS"30> i^.

3 t - -fO

C•o(n

3D)3

Ho

oo

Oo

^ Q. T

oil° !? O

£ aS. w c^ ST "2•— i -iW N> c

<§ a i£1 O 2

a> IB

(B

O>

xi—CO

Page 86: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

C/> O -7

t i in& « £3 W

C/> Q «

•§ « <° ** —-O ro CO5 5 0£ - 0 0 .5 I

oO

__O03

QOa:

CO

gLLJ

r^$Z

t^-

LU

r^gZ

to

g:LLJr- -

g

$LLJ

N.

§Z

O

LLJ

r~gZ

opCOhLg

tcaN.§z

°rCD

CD1 .§Z

oo

9r~|

0

mi-i-

z

Q.

= 1s |o

CO

0

tN

O

o

LLJ1—>

<

<

Z) Z) O 3 15 D

CM CM r-j rg c\l CMLH ID in m LO LOo o o o o o0 0 O 0 O 0

Z) 3 13 3 Z) Z)

o o o o o oLO LO LO LO ID IT)o o o o o oo o o o o o

^! ^> ^> ^> ^> ^3

O 0 O 0 O OUO UO U^ LO LO LOo o o o o oo o o o o o

Z) 13 r> D D Z)

o o o o o oLO LO LO LO LO LO0 O O 0 O 0

o o o o o o

Z) D D D Z) Z5

0 O O O O 0LO LO lO LO LO LOO 0 O 0 O O

0 0 O 0 O O

Z) 3 3 Z) Z)

O O O O £] 0 SLO LO IT) LO LOo o o o o o oO 0 O O O

~~} ~> ~) ^ ~> ~~)3 Z3 Z) ro 3 Z> ^

LO LO LO LO LO ^~

CM CM CM ^1 CM CM

3 Z) Z) 3 0 Z>

O O O 0 ,0 O [S10 LO LO LO £; 10O O O O O 0

o o o o ° o

D Z) Z) Z) 3

0 0 0 0 £ 0 £LO LT) U~) lO LDo o o o o o oo o o o o

3 3 Z) Z) 0 Z)

o o o o ra o *-LO LO LO LO -<— LO rf-,

o o o o n oo o o o o

< < < < < <z z. z z: z: z

co n ro co n roo o o o o o

< < < < < <z z z z z z

LO 10 10 10 m LOo o o o o o

l£> -r- CM CO 'et OT- CM ^t -^ m CD COO CM CM CM CM CM CDT T V T "7 T Oo o o o o o °-o o o o o o 03O 0 0 0 0 0 —

< < < < < < ! -

CMa

<Q

0>

"o5io>orIt

or

_J15)^ctocgro

"cCD0coo

<

3«2"O£ro

«LLJ

II

t3S'S-D

CO

IIZ)

0>oi)TOC0

I

id c

once

n

£raE*-i(/)LUIIUJ

§*=

1

c80)Q.

rav>•o0)_3

QIIQ

cTO<P0

DO<rT3Q)

I0}

a3W0>

TDD-QTOjCto

COc:s5

<J

xcee

ds G

0)

a>3CO

II

CO

CO

-ffi1CM

g

xce

ed

s G

CD

CUZ3

ro,

IIJD

roJD

on

5

O(/>•o0)ooX<D

OJura

no

COINO CM

Page 87: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-!>• -I^ aro o

O||

C

roxcced

s

O$

0

^

d)

crn

CD

CDxcee

ds

0

roo

r.i

CJ

<

CJ

CD

XoCDCDCLt/J

0g

o

(r, l

00

3JQ.T>Q.

ro

T)X

T>fQ.

OD

£

OiiD

^a?d

-ample

oo0(D

3

O

mnm

3a)

Q-

oon2

3g

3J

of

cIIzo

Q.•00

IIm~3CJ

0.

T>

j>

oooro

SU

OIJ

B.

3

c

^

O>

"Dro

Xr~CO

H

CJ

(-}CDGO

--4

CO

oro— j

oCOCO

ro

>ooo

roO)o

o

Z

oCO

Z

0

oc

o

0

c

o0en

O0enoC

ooenoC

ooenoC

ooenoC

o

0

c

0oen0

C

OoenoC

>0oo

rjen

o

Z

oCO

Z

0

oc

o

oc

oro

o0enoC

ooenoC

0COCOo

ooenoC

o

oC

00enoC

0oenoC

>

oo'

ro

CD

sZ

o

Z

o

en

o

o

CJo

0oen

C

00enoC

ooenoC

O0enoC

o0enoC

,

0)o

ooenoC

0oeno

C

>ooo

ro-ti-ro

oen

Z

oCO

z

o

0

o

0

c

0oen

C

00enoC

ooenoC

ooenoC

OoenoC

o

oc

ooenoC

ooenoC

>o0

roro

o

Z

0

Z

o

0

c

0

oc

0oen

C

o0enoC

ooenoC

OoenoC

ooenoC

o

0

c

ooeno

C

ooen0

C

>ooo

I

0

CD

Oen

Z

oCo

z

o

o

o

oc

0oen

C

ooenoC

Ooenoc

ooenoC

OoenoC

o

oC

ooenoC

ooen0

C

Zr~—\n

§

O

ro

CO

O

? S o2. c O

Z

m

z

m

i.D

m

en

Z

m

CO

z

m<E

z

m

o

Z

m

Z

m

CD

Z

mro

z

mroCD

Page 88: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

a>

V) O 3-" '« )^ CM. '—•

</)

C/)Q_ nQ. -^D ro ^T

co a w

o £ «o ro COS ? O

oo

a>

_aCD

QOCC

Qrca

§

r-

<**

*^

Z

O>

LLJ

L^i>Z

CO

LLJ

^>

C^z

inLLJ

^>!*-

$Z

-fLU5

1

9*

-z.

CO

LLJ

2

'

§z

CM

LLJ2

t^

Z

CDCO

LLJ

risZ

Q.

i "Sflj >

Q> j

0

CO

O

0

O

LLJ\-

_J

Z<i

0CM

O

^3m

Z)oCDCD

3

0inoo

^0inoo

Z>

omoCD

-,omo0

Z>oinCDCD

^>

Oinoo

—r

COO

zino

CO

o•ooo<

oCMO

Z)

in

oino0

3omoo

^omo0

^oinoo

^>otn0o

D0inoo

Z)

0in0o

-^

COCD

Z

ino

CMCM

00o<

30CM0

^3in

oinoo

3

0LOoo

^oinoo

3

0inoo

-3

0ino0

12omoo

Z>oinoo

^

COo

1ino

CM

CM

oL>o<

Z)

oCMo

Z)

in

oino0

Z)omoo

^omoo

Z>oin0o

^>omoo

Doinoo

Doinoo

^

COo

z

ino

CO

CMi

Ooo<

CC

— J

rrmo

CO— jD

13

oinoo

=>omoo

Z)0inoo

D

oinoo

-,

0ino0

o

0

o

COo

^y

COO

zino

inCMiooo<

— 1

Z)

0

o

Z)

in

0mo0

30inoo

^0moo

Z)

oinoo

z>omo0

Z5

oinoo

Z)omoo

^

CO

o

iino

oCDCM

1

ooo<

^tm0

CO' —

o

0

COo

l/lCDOQ_

*^1-

CO

X

CMQ.

<Q

Oco

_J

.cen

trat

ions

in

c8<

, R

= R

ejec

ted

v;

CD

0)COiLUII

£*zco

II

ne c

alib

ratio

n li

rr

*•'>orocoZ3COis

mat

ed c

once

n

(OLUII

LLJ

Cg

Is'c

§

'o.

ro

x>3

QMQ

J5

JJQ.

Croo>oQOo:"m

d re

sults

exc

ee

T>ro

CO

roEZ

-t±U

lue

exce

eds

G

CO

II

ro

CO

t±o

CM

lue

exc

ee

ds

G

CO

IIJD

CO

Q)

bCO

ow•o(DOOX1)OJZJ

CO

1]o

slot a

pplic

able

M

-z.

00

8™CM SO CNQ i;

Page 89: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

0

M

Co>o>XooCDO_l/>

CD$CO

0

^r?

CJ

crii

cT>

T>XnT>CDQ.Ji

O

roo

CD

CJ

O)

II

CD

CCD

CDXoCDOdinO

n

oID

00:rCDQ.

d

fyj

C

0?

CDXoCDTa.

ODoCD

O

gcfCDCL

CJ

3TD

CD

O0

OCD13

3o

mnm

-j^jT>Q.

O

OCD

CL)

O

cucrO

Cn

OT5

CLCD

CDO

II

m

3

Q.

3

O

O

T>ro

Xr~CO

— ioQ)

-p

oCDCO

en

oeo

>oo0

roCT>o

oen

Z

0

-.0

Z

0

o

c

ooenro

C

ooenoc

ooen0

C

o0en0

C

Ooeno

C

ooen0C

ooen0

C

ooenoC

>oo0

NJ

2

oen

Z

0

eo

Z

~*en

o

ooenro

C

o0enoC

ooen0

' —

o0en0

C

oeo

o

ooeno

C

CD

OenoC

O

oen0

C

>oo0

«

roCO

oen

Z

0

Z

o

oC7

ooenro

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

O

0

0

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

>o0

0

ro

ro

0

en

z

oCO

Z

o

0

c

ooenro

C

CD

OenoC

CD

Oeno

C

o0eno

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

ooeno

C

>Oo0

roro

0

en

Z

o

Z

o

oc

ooenro

C

CD

Oeno

C

ooenoC

o0eno

C^

ooeno

C

ooenoC

ooen0

C

ooeno

C

>ooo

o

a

0

en

Z

>

oeo

Z

o

0

^

ooenro

C

CD

Oen0

C

ooeno

C

o0eno

C

ooeno

C

O

oeno

C

ooenoC

ooenoC

-£,

^

~£,

I"

-<

1

m

O

-^

iro

0§eo

0

? 2 §<L i 0

T3

Z

— 1

^<J

ro

Z

~^J

%<ron

ZsE"j^j%

eoCO

1

<EOJ

1A.^>CO

Z

MM

W-4A

z

-j

$

03

Z.

-g

§

z

•~-J~^

%

,CD

Page 90: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CMa

<a

COT3 in

T-

CM

O)3

</>3tfli _*

Q. 2 «3 ro to O <3

' fe <O -*^ __O ro CD5 S O

_CDJ3TO

'

^

Q.

Q iO roQ: a>

o

. ,•*•£

-

"

e0)

1oQ.

CM

Ero4_

w•g

CO

ra3-^n

OQ

ma>

^-*i^gz

5hizo

1h*

1

§1

Jocv5o

i

o

HI

>-

<

<

D0moo

3oo0

-,oino0

ID

0

oo

ID

oinoo

oinoo

^y

roo

Z

ino

CD

o

0CJ0

<

^om00

_,

oin00

-,

omo0

ID

Omoo

=>oinoo

oinoo

-^

CO

o

Z

in0

CMCM

ooo<

3omo0

_,

oinoo

-,

oin0o

13

omoo

ID

oo0

oinoo

<

CO

0

z

ino

CM

CM

OOO

<

3

Oinoo

_

oinoo

_,oinoo

3oino0

0oinoo

oinoo

^y

roo

^

ino

CO

CM

ooo<

Z)

omoo

ID

Oino0

-,oino0

ID

Oinoo

ID

Omoo

omo0

^7

CO

O

Z

ino

5CM

OO0

<

ID

Omo0

ID

Omo0

ID

Oino0

ID

Oinoo

ID

Oinoo

ID

Omoo

2

CO

o

Z

ino

oCDCM

OOO

<

CD0Q.

3~Q

1-

oin

_,75>c

cg'raca>o

§

<

3•o£tjCDCDa:n

"5a>

S15jiUJn—30£IS

co

n

the c

alib

ratio

n li

mi'

0}

gJDra

1

1m

d c

onci

-Sro

"toUJnUJ

co

'c

c

8<DCL

ro

£Br5IIQ

V)0)

Q.3

m)

OOOtT3

§

a(OCD

TJro

(/)

ro

50

gO

xcee

ds

0)0)

"ro

iiro

ro

oCM

§O

o>8XCDCD

"ro

nJ3

roCD

oCO

<>O

xcee

ds

CDCD

Iv

IIO

s

1CLnro0

II

z

COCMO CN

^ §O CN

D CI- ^

Page 91: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oo

0>r

a g*•• .Xio 0 -"0 ? "5)c- c ii5 CM 3=E CM —

m ' •-Q. nj «T •£ >»j nj —

C/> Q «

1*2§i°a -o >2 §

oo

0

<cuSro

in

§UJ

T§UJ

trd>

CD

00i

m

oCD

O)CO

rCO

IB

IiQ.13c^ro0)OQOcr

7

<y!.(

'; 31A

1VN

V

- «>-'

Z> Z)

Z) Z>

Z) Z)

Z) Z>

Z>

CM ,_

O5

3 Z)

Z)

in o*~ CM

< ^f*4.

^y ^y

0O Oo oin o

in

IICM

oben

zene

•1,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

| g

6 S

Zi

— )Z)

Z)

Z)

COh-

CDCD

O>OO

•^7

Ooooin

oo0oCM

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

COo

Z)

z>

Zi

Z)

mi

CO

CD

COO)

inh~-T~

<

<

ichl

oroe

then

e (to

tal)

oCM

=3 3

=> 3

Z) Z)

=> 3

=> 3„_ ^

=> 3

=> 3CD O>

CNJ CN

<f

z ^

IIo

0 0CM O

CO

,2-T

etra

chlo

roet

hane

chlo

roet

hene

CM ra

"~. oaT- 1-

Z)

Z)

D

3^_

Z>

Z)

CT>CM

-7

0OO

8

Oo

CN1

•Tnc

hlor

oe th

ane

CM

Z) ZIo

Z) Z)o

Zi 130

Z) -Do

roh-

CD CD CM

OO CM

ro3 -J„_ 00 <*>

CM

roCOCO

!•*- CM

m CM

o oo oo oo oCM --a-

oO CMCO

oroe

then

eC

hlor

ide

Chl

orin

ated

Vol

atlle

s

0 >• SC = 0H > 1-

0>3ro>T3St3CD0)criicc^_r

mce

ntra

tions

in u

g/L

on-d

etec

t, J=

Est

imat

ed r

esul

8 *= ii< Z)

Eco'ro

^3CD

£

timat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

abov

e

<nUJII

UJ

CO

CD>

.2o.3

lute

d sa

mpl

e co

ncen

tratio

n

ed r

esul

ts e

xcee

d R

OD

cle

an

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-2 c

riter

ia

S S nQ W ro

m

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-3 c

riter

iaN

ot a

pplic

able

= su

rface

wat

er s

team

sam

pli

> " COII < !_a Z CO

o:

<Q

oo"o

oQ

Page 92: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

i Oro o5 ^(0 O

to

ro

O

O

O

O41.o

OO

w -z.H >OT ,1N

ot applicable

= surface water steam

s

CD

3TJ0)

cr co co11 " c?< < Q.CO CO (I1

c7 c a

0> CD 3CD CD LnX X Co o ^O fD y>

" a 2'-" « oQ 5 sS S CL

co ro Z)o o O3- 2. 0tij m oco oS ^^ •" co

z)c-otT<rouT

OitOluted sam

ple concentrat

0ZJ

m c >n n =m -, r>in ^— r~im

centrations in ug

/L

on-detect, J= Estim

ated

.timated concentration a

cr _,O CD

ro £

ro 73O Mm ii

? £

" S§ ffi-CL

1 Sc0)

-1 <2 5cu ^

Chloride

Chlorinated V

olatiles

rj

4^OO0o

ro

ro §CO °IDO

CO

COCO O-si

COo m

o>ro roCO4*-M 01

(0 ^

° C

4v-J NJCOCO

CO

roCO °CO<=> C

_k

en °>CO

CO

—Iozrloroethene

o0

rooo0o

CJl

o

oo

CO

enCOo

CO

*.00o

CO

Olro

enCOo

CO

c

_.

ro-Trichloroethane

roo0o

enoo0o

~Z.>

enen

C

CT)CD

C

4*.cn

C

-si

c

CO

(

roo

C

C

-H ->fl> "_i3 "ro2-T

etrachloroethane

chloroethene

COo roo oo

§ 82 o0 0

en •£>

en enen o>

C C(— c_

CT) CDCO CD

£ c

4> 4»cn o>

£ c

--J -si

c c

CO CO

C Cc_ c_

ro roO 0

£ c

£ c

_!

roniichloroethene (total)

>

z:3>

^— gen

rorooo

roo>oo

cooo

1

o>O)0

COo>o

COso

oLO

ro6Dzr00Qr

(tiz>O

roooo

enooo0

~Z.>

roooo

ro4x0o

o>oo

4^COO

CT>

O

COeno

CO->1

=r oCU Z7

w 9obenzene-1,2-D

ichloroethene

ro __,

§ §0 °

eno uio oo o0

2 ^Z.> >

isc

ri CDS ^c_>

c

8 &c

-si -sj

c c

ro -*CO CD

Q

ro roo o

C C

C C

>

>

m

O§ro

O

CO

73OOOCD0)3

-o

5"i

m

CO

m

cb

m

o

m*_x

m

_&o>

m

-j

00

a1

cft>

Oo

<|fO ? S0 ~ o_> ? §.w 0 V

vT 51 c2. N "S« ' T

^^ i"9. a °? £

3.T>

Page 93: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oo

0)t

«

-3 «> -^tf) Q «•D i- <fO 0>

TO

oT—

LLJ

O)

LLJ

opLJJ

inLJJ

tUl

|

Ul

C\l

Ul

"CD

Q.

c<00>

0QOccoo

5

I

UJ

j

z>

^

-

=>

i-

-

^•z.

ooin

oo0

oben

zene

O.co

ZJ

z>

COCN

^

^-

Z)

-

z

o

ooooCM

•1 2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

ificro

CDCN

in

oin

Z)

O)

Z>

^z

0oo0m

ooo0CM

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

toCJ

f^CN

01

m

oen

Zl

0r\j

-

int

Z

Z

'ichl

oroe

then

e (t

otal

QCM

"-

z>

Z>

-

Zl

Z)

I-

Zl

-

•z.

0oo0CM

oCN

CD

,2-T

etra

chlo

roet

han

CN

*-

Zl

—3

Zl

^

Zl

Z)

r-

3

in

o0om

oooCO

chlo

roet

hene

ro15i-

z>

Z)

^

Zl

Z)

1-

Z)

^~z.

oo0oin

ooo0CN

-Tnc

hlor

oeth

ane

CM

*-"

^CN

-,

Oro

13

IO

CM

in

oo0oCN

ooCO

oroe

then

e

no1-

m

CO

CM

CO

CO

CO

CO

COr-

Z>

Zl

Z)

h-

I

CM

OO0O

CM

Chl

orid

e

c

>

ro

CD

CDCOCD

O

0

CD

CM

to

Chl

orin

ated

Vol

atile

Sot-

.nro

0)cr

at-ao

oro

cent

ratio

ns in

ug/

L

c8—<

3

CDCD

II

Q:

"3L—

n-de

tect

, J=

Est

imat

ed

o

uZ)

ove

the

cal

ibra

tion li

mit

£,

mat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

a

S3wUlnUl

£O

ted

sam

ple

con

cent

rat

3

6itQ

CL

CroCDCJ

d re

sults

exc

eed

RO

D

ID-oro.cCO

CO

Q)

bCM

o•oCDoXCD

CD

"ro>IICD

roCO

oCO

0

8oXCO

CO

"ro>11_o

Jot a

pplic

able

.£_ii<(

^.

CDCL

Enj

surf

ace

wat

er s

team

s

uCO| —CO

COCMO CN

CN SO CN

o i;

Page 94: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

_: oro o

co— iCOM

J>C3,QJ-">T>

CO

(I)"

CO

CDCJ

3(/)QJ

3"O0)

z ^~J> II

11 <•^ ID

°. ^CD -D

O TJ

& £

» 0§CO

o

CD*

CD

CDII

CDCCD

CDxcee

ds

o

roo

CD

0

COzrCDQ.CDCL

CDCOC

CO

CDXoCDCDQ.

ODnCDCD

C^

CD'CD_

aM0

^f?Q.C/)OJ

3"DtPco

nce

ntra

t

-1

miim

Bcuf?Q-

o0130e

ntra

tion a

croCD

zrQ

O

r~r

cII

zoZJ

CLCD

CD0

IIEstim

ate

d

fDU?

^0II

^j

j>

0o13Ort>13

suo

ue

.

ZJ

O

o

o-t-o

CDCT

CD

§ J o - £±i — zr ro CD ro QO O o -H n ro 5 ^

" ° V § ? ^ 33 S 2 5 S

CO Oro o o

CJ10

o o oo o o

o ro Z

rooooo

o oo oo o

en eno oo o

CoCDo

u i o o c o c o g g e n c o

C C C

oo en en en

t_ C C C

en en

C C

c c c p c c p c

c c c £ c c ^ c c

c c c c c c c c c

c c c c c c c c c

m

0

O

m

CD

m

OO

Page 95: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oo

0>r

t:8." '«

O f

!i§lroO

_.0ro

OL<CO

g2

03CNl

5

Q.

Q

<W

i

cH

§2

a:CD

5

§

"a>CD(

a.3COCDOQ0rrro

O

CM

O

. ,

,

AN

ALY

TE

Z)

Z)

CM

Z>

3

Z)

CDTf

z>enCO

0oin

oo0

oben

zene

6.cO

Z)

Zi

CM

Z>

z>

D

CO•<t

Z>

0)CO

ooosoo0oCM

•1,2

-Dic

hlor

oeth

ene

tocro

Z>

O>CD

Z)

Z)

oCO

Z>

a>CD

oo0oin

oo0oCM

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

w0

Z)

h-

Z)

Z)

oro

Z)

a>CD

inh-

<

<

ichl

oroe

then

e (t

otal

)

9CM

'-

Z)

z>

CM

D

Z)

D

CDT}-

Zl

CDCD

OOOOCM

OCM

,2-T

etra

chlo

roet

hane

CM

'-

3

iZ)

CM

>

—J

Z)

CO•<t

— >

01CO

in

oooin

oo0ro

chlo

roet

hene

roUSi-

z>

Z)

CM

3

Z>

D

CO•<t

O

o>CD

OO0om

oo0oCM

-Tric

hlor

oeth

ane

CM

r~

Z)

r-~ro

D

Z>

ro

oo

ro

oor~

in

o0ooCM

OoCO

oroe

then

e

r.oH

Z)

ro

CMCO

D

Z)

D

CDTT

Z)

CT>CD

CM

O0OOTfr

CM

Chl

orid

e

>-.c>

0

h~

^tO

O

o

oroCM

O0h-

Chl

orm

ated

Vol

atlle

s

3o\-

CDo:

o•<tO

<Q

CO

'oin

15.3

conc

entr

atio

ns in

—<

R =

Re

ject

ed

valu

e

4-T

3inCD

itim

ated

Non

-det

ect,

J= E

;

nZ)

ie c

alib

ratio

n lim

it.

±3

ICO

§.=CO

Est

imat

ed c

once

n

MLU

c0

n c

entr

alD

ilute

d sa

mpl

e co

nQ

to

$JD

CL3Cro0)oQOtrT3

aded

res

ults

exc

e<

.cto

roCD

5CM

^

Val

ue e

xcee

ds G

itO3

TO

<V

<J

CO

§

; Val

ue e

xcee

ds G

nJD

. = N

ot a

pplic

able

<z

CDCLEro10

Enj.32To

S =

sur

face

wat

er

h-C/5

COCNlO CM

Page 96: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

i Oro oo ^ro o

ho

to—1C/)IIsurface w

at

en

enQ)3(f>CD

3-o

CT>

ZJ>

k±oOJT3TD

OCJcrro

cril<culu

e e

xcee

ds

O<r<

OJ

O

CD

E>

DJII

<a>lu

e e

xcee

ds

O<5roo

cp

ni

COzrn>CLrod results ex<

i ifDfDQ.

XI

0ooCDCDZJC-of$<CD

C/J

a1!

DcTQ.

(f>CO

3-oT)

nozinCD•3

s.oZl

mtimi/i

3CD

enea0oz>0enZ)

S

OZ3

03crO<CO

CO

_crS

Oa

CM

Zoz>CLroro0

C-_II

m07

iCD

CDQ.

CDOlc

^J

7]ftrDoQCL

>

ooT•ce

ntra

tion

s

ZJ

ctor"

O)o

O

O

Oi»o

0)CTro

OO

-HOE

Chlorinated V

ola

roe/i

o

o

0

o

eooen

o

0

<5-<.C

hloride

ro

-t^oooo

ro

C

C

C

c

L

e_n

C

C

— t0zrloroethene

c_*jo0

rooooo

CJ1

C

C

C

C

O

c

c

_1

ro-Trich

loro

eth

an

e

rooooo

CJ1ooo0

~z.>

c

c

C

C

C

C

C

-\£3chloroethene

ooo

Ulooo

e_n

Cc_

cc_

Cc_

C

Cc_

C<_

c

.

ro2 Te

trach

loro

eth

0)Zlro

ro0

rooo0o

•z.i>

c

c

c

c

c

c

c

J

ron'ichloroethene (to

CO

>

~z.>

ieji

C

C

C

c

e_)

C

C

o(/)

2-Dichloroethene

rooooo

<_n0ooo

7LJ>

C

C

C

c

er>

o

C

C

„CJZlV)•1 2

Dich

loro

eth

e

Z3ro

rooooo

CJ1o0oo

-z.J>

C

c

c

c

c

c

c

ozrc5o

be

nze

ne

ooo

ejioo

Z.>

C

C

C

c

c

c

c

>>-<Hm

/"}uv

ro

CD

u>

73O0O(C0)z*c•o1 —CD

s

CJCD

S

u

3o

>

jxCD

2

• 4>

^

§CO

2

-»J

o

Page 97: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

TO

o0COCOom

roCMCOomi-

§CNCO0CD

COCO

CO

CMCO

CO

CO

CO

00

5

CO

<J2

CDI

CL

roCD

OQ0ccCO

C3

CM

O

LU

_J

Z)

Z)

Z>

)

Z)

3

Z)

z>

Z)

-

-z.

ooin

ooo

oben

zene

o

6

Z)

Z)

Z>

— 3

Z)

Z)

=•

Z)

^-z.

ooooin

ooooCM

<DC

•1,2

-Dic

hlo

roe

the

COcro

_,

Z)

ID

CO

ID

Z)

Z)

CMCM

,

Z

oooom

o0ooCM

2-D

ichl

oroe

then

e

10o

-,

13

Z)

•<*

Z)

D

3

CNCN

in

Z

^

ichl

oroe

then

e (to

QCM<-"

D

_,

ID

-1

^

Z)

Z)

-

z

ooooCM

OCM

CDCro

,2-T

etra

chlo

roet

h

CM

•*-

_,

Z)

Z)

-"

3

Z)

Z)

—)z>

in

oooin

oooCO

chlo

roet

hene

ro

i-

Z)

ID

ID

_>

3

Z)

Z)

Z)

-

z

0oooin

ooooCM

•Tnc

hlor

oe th

ane

CM

'-"

D

_,

Z)

— 3

Z)

13

Z)

in

in

ooo0CM

OOCO

oroe

then

e

o

t-

— ,

_,

_,

— •)

Z)

Z)

Z)

Z)

Z)

OJ

oooo

CM

Chl

orid

e

c>

o

o

ro

O

0

o

ro

to.3?

Chl

orin

ated

Vol

a

£\-

oo

CDrr

O

Q

CO

'o

J

c

'tice

ntra

tions

8—<

= R

ejec

ted

val

Q:

COCD

1ro

LUII

o

§~Z.MZ)

calib

ratio

n lim

il

CD£

1rocgroc0}

timat

ed c

ono

MLUnLU

co

cent

ral

c8CD0.

1•o1QnQ

C/j

SQ.13Cro0)oQOUL-Q

CD

XCD

CD

T3CU

ro-CCO

ro

0)

bCM

(D

alue

exc

eeds

>Mro

roCD

bro

O

alue

exc

eeds

>n

_Q

0)

Not

app

licab

l

n<^~z.

CDCLEro(O

Ero

IO

CD

= su

rfac

e w

at

w| —

CO

O CMO Ch- •*

Page 98: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

^ Dro o GO

II

c

COoo

CDer stea

m s

CO3

n-^vlot apphcab

T>

<-COlue exceeds

iCO

n

CD

CO

<-CDlue exceeds

o

roq

CD

CD

COCLn>Q.

CDwcc/rCDXoCDCDQ.

73OOoCDCD

gcCDQ.cnOJ3

cb~concentrat

Q

m.-»m

ate

d con

ee

ntra

tion a

crO

CD

ZOn-detect, J =

Estim

ate

d

_^

CDV>r—

oQ

icen

tratio

ns

<o

O> ^J

S "§ ^£ Q

<

5^-C

hloride

ro

oooo

ro

C

C

c

H

o

oro

eth

en

e

oo

rooooo

en

C

C

C

^

-•ro•T

nch

loro

eth

a

nCD

roOOOo

enOooo

Z

C

C

c

—1£CDch

loro

eth

fine

COooo

enooo

en

C

C

C

_L

"->

ro2-T

etra

chlo

ro

CDITCO

CD

roo

ro0ooo

Z

C

c

c

_i

ro6ich

loro

eth

en

eo5?

Z

Z

en

C

C

C

oen_— 2

-Dich

loro

eth

CDu

roooo0

enooo0

Z

c

c

c

S3

-1,2

-Dich

loro

e

rrCD

CD

rooo0o

oooo

z

C

C

C

ocobenzene

ooo

enoo

Z

C

c

c

2

r~

m

Q

ro

O

CO

7300O<DCO

CT3I —O>

1

0COCO

0

5o8s-1

oOlosu

Oo

«

.

o

4.T>

O

O

O-t^o

73re

COCT(D

Oo

Page 99: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

0)t:°> 5*-* -3

O

<? P|LU|

ID

Q)ce

o•tO

<Q

hr P

§O! CO UO

-8P =3 Z) -,

in in CO

LO

oinro

-QCO

9 0 0 0 °

15 § § § m S

liM

TE e e e

>: 5n n n l

z

nze

nze

e bZ S ff S

a>ca>

o go

e I I f o »-° ° I II §

O ochl

c

1 .3

-Di

.4-D

i

,2-D

ien

tac

.2,

CO

ao

0)3

3 I"D —<U Co 2Si ra(D i-

ce -9it gK <y*-" «^ CD

^ I §"O nj -j±

? 1 c

J5s-5:Q.acdj ,<5 TO0 Q> SQ 'c ••£O o o

^>Q.

ooCNO CN

™ O (NQ i-

Page 100: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Oo

OSo

o-t .o

Q>CJCD

CO

OO

c o z ^ " " o o o m c >

^ < < I ° ™ z "" < < c i 5 : U ) Z oM — r C D C J C D r z ~- O 13

w o ^ ^ ^ - c o B ? "c 2 a > c t , s g . f 3 a . gg - £ c D C D £ w c D £ 2| ? s s § g a s sg f s S c E j f - c l S - oI & 2 £ * ^ S V «^ * « § § § I LT =£ S § a ^ 3 ^ £M « ^ ^ 3 c 5 w ^q o o O — zj —« S S o 3 „ gQ ) 5 ^ 0 5 0 - ^3 ?, F> CD D ° ^>^ " "" | r» ^CO c - =

13 ^ 33

< 8 "CD ^ ~n— rr ''en ^ CD

~ So GZ) CD_ dZ3 <i OJ

CCD

—1 -^2 4-Tnchlorobenzene

otal SV

OC

s

oooo

enoo

COUlo

enO

C

i °o

^

eno

C

eno

C

oC

o

C

o

C

-oentachlorophenol

-2L

000

~Z.

ro

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

_»2-Dichlorobenzene

oo0o

CDo00

~z.

cn

C

en

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

_.4-Dichlorobenzene

COoooo

COooo

en

en

C

ro0

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

^3-Dichlorobenzene

oooo

§oo

^

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

AN

ALY

TE

—CD

IO

CO—xOooo(1>0)

cT3I —

1

m

_*o

m

^

m

CO

m

2

iCO

2

ro

m

im

^

Page 101: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

k.(VC

^ 555 0 j-D "O D)C c ^b CM ~—^ CM w0) ' '«Q. « ^ TO TO

(O Q C-0 v. <0 « 0

1 I >

0 ^ Wz 5oo

•'I —

<CD-QOJ1-

CDCN|

1UJ2

31

LLJ

2

ffl

^LLJ

<

T—

LU2

Q

LU2

o-jLLJ2

COUJ

~"?LU

*^

"QJ

1Q.3C

0Q0cc

^?oCM

§o_— -

AN

ALY

TE

rr OLo o

Z) ^>

m m

5 — 3Z> Z)

in in

— j ~r>Z> Z)in in

Z) 3

m m

Z> Z)

in m

Z> O

m in

3 3

ID Z)m m

< in*-

0 0o oO 0CO CO

o oo o0 0o oT- CO

,3-D

ichl

orob

enze

ne,4

-Dic

hlor

oben

zene

••- *-

cr a:o o

=> ^m ™

— >

3 =m ™

3 3in ™

Z) 3

in £(

Z) ^

in £

Z) =>

m £

— 3

3 ^m £

< <2 Z

oo oO COCO

oO *fo $o z

,2-D

ichl

orob

enze

neen

tach

loro

phen

ol

<- Q-

cr o0

Z) ._.oin

3 oin

—-}0 oin

~!

oin

Z)

in °

Z)

^ °

~>Z)

^ °

omCO

ooin

oooo

,2,4

-Tnc

hlor

oben

zene

otal

SV

OC

s

T- i-

o>~n5>

"O

3"oO)0)

CCiirr•fc-

3

II co

ncen

tratio

ns in

ug/

L.=

Non

-det

ect,

J= E

stim

ated

re;

< Z)

-•-1

E

libra

tion

s0>(—

0)

^Est

imat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

abov

LU

=Dilu

ted

sam

ple

conc

entra

tion

Q

>nCO

-CO

CLDCra

hade

d re

sults

exc

eed

RO

D c

le;

CO

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-2 c

riter

ia

TO

= V

alue

exc

eeds

GW

-3 cr

iteria

J3

CO

a

A =

Not

app

licab

le.

TS =

sur

face

wat

er s

team

sam

•z. co

OoCO

oTf

OI-<Q

Oro

COCMO CM

M SO CNQ ^I- Tf

Page 102: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

^ aro o

O

O

o

B>crCD

V)

OO

in zA = Not applicable

TS = surface w

ater stearr

i/>CD

3•D

CD

CT 0= Value exceeds G

W-2

c

= Value exceeds G

W-3

c

~ ~5 ooJ EJ

co o m c >II concentrations in ug'L

= Non-detect

J= Estim

ati

= Estim

ated concentration

=Diluted sam

ple concentr

haded results exceed RO

0 Si cu &o 5 CT _,CD § g CD

3 5 1"° 5" ^2 S "ft rr- -ri— • rr ^cn ^ CD

Si B0 GZ5 CD_ a3 S_ CO

CD

-1 -•2 4-Tnchlorobenzene

otal SV

OC

s

ooo0

Uloo

OJUlo

Ul

0 c

Ul

co

0 ^

c

0 <"

c

0 ^

C

0 ^

Cc_

o "•C

o °-c

"Dentachlorophenol

>

COo

>

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

K>

C

fo

C

ro

C

_^

2-Dichlorobenzene

oooo

COo0o

>

cn

c

Ul

c

Ul

c

Ul

c

Ul

c

Ul

cc_

Ul

c

Ul

C

_>4-Dichlorobenzene

CJc?ooo

COo0o

cn

cn

C

Ul

C

Ul

C

Ul

C

Ul

C

Ul

Cc_

Ul

C

Ul

C

_iJ-Dichlorobenzene

oooo

CO0oo

-7JL.

>

Ul

c

Ul

c

Ul

C

Ul

C

Ul

C

Ul

C

Ul

C

cn

C

>

>r~

m

O

ro, _

O

CO—3ODO<t>ffl3CT3

r-CD

1

Sm_A

CO03

mCO0)

ocTJ

mto

* s2mt

CO

mi.

S"%m"tx*

Sm°°V,

^mto

Page 103: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

h-0>t

o> g-•-• -*co 0 J-D "a 0)C C 35 CM —.E CN y,1_ , • —

a> toa. 2 >*^ TO nj

CO Q c-0 J- <O O_ -S O

IIS0 ^ COZ c

3ok.O

<CO

_aCO

CD°?>>

a:jj-

<?~>•$•

COCM

>;>

0.IDQ

<CN-~>§

^CM

>>

OfCDi§

<

>5-:>

1^3Q.Z3CCO0)

0QOccCO

CD

CM

O

u

<<

3 Z z> = z> oin in m ^ m

D =: 13 Zl 13 0

m in in ^ in

Z) 13

in in

3 Z)

in in

=5 Z)

m m

Z) Z>

in in

T- CM

< 0

O O0 00 000 OO

o oo o0 0o oT- CO

1 ,3

-Uic

hlor

oben

zene

1 ,4

-Dic

hlor

oben

zene

D ^ ^)0

in ^ in

-^ 0Z) D Z

in J^ in

^ ^ ^ om ^ m

Z) D Z) o

m Jj m

.03 O LO

CO

,n rxi 0 <DCO CM o-,^~ in

< < s^ -^ ro

8 o g§ <° so oo << oo -i oo ^- o

1 ,2

-Dic

hlor

oben

zene

Pen

tach

loro

phen

ol

1 ,2

,4-T

richl

orob

enze

ne

Tot

al S

VO

Cs

CDH3O3>

"OwfjCp^

CO

o:IItr

All

conc

entr

atio

ns i

n ug/L

U=

Non

-det

ect,

J= E

stim

ated

res

u

.*_:

Ecg03

^8CO-C

E=

Est

imat

ed c

once

ntra

tion

abov

e

D=D

ilute

d sa

mpl

e co

ncen

trat

ion.

(/>CO>CDQ.3

Sha

ded

resu

lts e

xcee

d R

OD

cle

ar

a =

Val

ue e

xcee

ds G

W-2

crit

eria

.

ni•c£'5CO

C3«

XCO

CD3ra

n£> N

A =

Not

app

licab

le.

01

ST

S =

sur

face

wat

er s

team

sam

ph

ooco

o>tr

o•<tO

<Q

ooCMO (N

(N 5O CMQ ^

Page 104: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

oro oroCO

eno

O

O

73(D

CO ZA = Not applicable

TS = surface w

ater steam s

QJ

3

(F

cr QJ= V

alu

e exce

ed

s GW

-2 crit

= V

alu

e exce

ed

s GW

-3 crit

<D roCD QJ

onhaded results exceed RO

D

o^

H)

cT3

S"

(DCO

D^Diluted sam

ple concentrat

0Z)

m c >II concentrations in ug

/L

= No

n-d

ete

ct J= E

stima

ted

=E

stimated concentration a

cr _,0 <t>S cIT "o> ^oo MCL) "

cr ^~

^ "(P5 a13 <T>

O.

1 1^ cCP

—1 ->2 4-Tnchlorobenzene

otal SV

OC

s

ooo0

enoo

eno

en0 c

en

0 c

en

CDc

en0 c

eno

C

en

° C

eno

C

~Den

tach

loro

ph

en

ol

2>

00o

zJ*

ro

C

ro

C

to

c

_>

c

ro

C

ro

C

ro

C

_>

2-D

ichlo

rob

en

zen

e

o0o0

COooo

z^*

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

_*4-Dichlorobenzene

COoooo

COooo

en

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

^

3-D

ichlo

rob

en

zen

e

oooo

COooo

zJ*

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

en

C

'

AN

AL

YT

E

O

ro

0

CO—

OOo(Du=)T3

(D

S

1CO

1>

1,03

|

*I-ijCO

11 -

1go

CJD

O

>

Oo

w i. om> -. Q.D D (Tw_ a> c

>< w "O« . ®

^s|cE H Q.D O ^

!S

CD

OO

Page 105: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

ooco

131/5CD

Q

O

L.

0t

o 3*•• -; . .CO 0 _j

1? I"i: CM —mJ fVI«£ CM </)

a> ' '«Q. " >,if- *•• .3 re «

CO Q C"O i_ <0 « 0

!!§0 ^ COz §

0

o

<0)

JDCD1-

coy;

CO

CMCO

CO

1C£

COO>

^!Q

cS0Qoa.

"<?§q

^9fi

u+-_1

^^

Y

—> —> —> ^ — )^ 3 Zl -1 Z)

in in in ! in °

— 3 ^> ^> 3? — >Zi Z> Z) — ' ZJ

in m m ^ in

•— )^ ^ ) ^ ^D Zi D -> Z>

in m in rxj in

~) —> —> ^ —>=) D 3 => =) om m m J^ m

<f <r << o^ m 5 ^ m*; ^. ^. n

CD

1 ^> E

"O

8 8 8 o ° 3 IO O O CO JX CD mco co co •" 5- S

ft- — CDo o o o n °! >o o o r f o " c 3 cuo o o S o C E c D "Z.o o o Z o . ^ Q.• ^ c r > T - T - — i3 g (j,

1 I § « g « E"- J3 2 o aj aj ra

S c I S 5 'I E= d | g c O |CD o i E r o O - . - . - i - i Sc = > - J 5 J = c £ > 5 w

g g g _ S ? w S 8 § « o < , i c oS S S i S ^ A c i ^ g ^ - S - g gC C C C D ^ ) o . O Q . a > < D H >( B C D C D J = 0 ^ 0 ° E — S H — C D

1HII8 Illl! IIIlllsf iilpif!n - t c M c B C M o - n n V ™ M II < ji:• r - ^ - ^ C L T - t - < Z > u j Q c o r o j 3 Z c o

or-

CMOQ

Page 106: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

0)t

v §•t-f -^

(O ^^ "TT3 "°

0-25,D ro -^W Q g

o a>o 13 CD? i °Ir

oO

CM

^

25m

1-

0}

UJ

OO

LLI

lO

LU

t§ID

Dr

CQ

CO*7en

o

en

o>CO

tCD

"53o>_iQ.

CCOCD

OQOOL

CO

O

CN

0

UJ

z**

in0

0

Z,

LOOO

^inoo

H

o

o0

22)

inoo

_,

mCM

o

moo

3

<£Z

coo

CD

0

i

0o0

<

moo

z,inoo

3

inoo

Z>

0

inoo

^j

in0o

inCM

o

inoo

D

<Z

CO

o

Z

CMCM

,

O00

<

m0

0

=>

moo

3

mo0

Z)

o

inoo

13— j

i,—

~<t

O

inCM

o

moo

^

<£Z

CO

o

Z

CM

CM

i

Ooo<

in0

0

3

inoo

ID

mo0

o

^

CMCO

O

23

inoo

_,

inCM

0

Z)

inoo

_o

CDin

Z

CO

o

z

OO

CM

i

0oo<

moo

=>

moo

CMCM

O

^-1

.0

in0

_D— 5

,—

roO

.0

^-*CO

CM

O

-O~)

inCD

Z

roO

Z

aCM

i

0Oo<

in o0

0

D

in ooo

CMm CM0 o0

3 c.CM

O

~ ' CDOO

m „0 °o

)CM

in |s-o oo

Z)

in mCM

o

Z)in ^0 00

CM

Z

CO

o

Z

s „CM CQ

"7 O6 °-O CO0 0

0)13OJ>•o0)^J0)COccII

CC

jntr

atio

ns in

ug/

L

dete

ct,

J= E

stim

ated

res

ull

o d:c o0 ^0 z

— ii< 3

I—coro_o

8o^

ate

d co

nce

ntr

atio

n a

bo

ve 1

EI/)IDIILU

W

?JD

Q.-i

d sa

mpl

e co

ncen

trat

ion

resu

lts e

xcee

d R

OD

cle

ani

e ex

ceed

s G

W-2

crit

eria

,

e ex

ceed

s G

W-3

crit

eria

,t

appl

icab

le,

jrfa

ce w

ater

ste

am s

ampl

e

a> -c, = a o w3 a> ni «o ^ n

S!^ < ?Q CO ro .0 Z CO

CDoaa_.0ro

OJCC

ah-Q

d

CD

'o

COCMo CM

D

Page 107: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

-i Dro oo ^ro O

roCO

roo

O

a

O£.o

CD(fiC.

0)CTCD

TJOCD

co z ~ ^ co o m c >— t j> ii ii -^ ii ii ii —c o , ^ a > o r n 7 o11 <- ^ Li — C / ) ^ _ Q1 1 - r C D Q J C D c ^ O ^ Ju ? 0 c c Q - J 3 ? "^ — 1> <T> 3 Q. 0) Q. 2^ " r o c f S ^ r o S -° ~o x o — C J C I ^ Q J^ ^ r o c D i / r s o — p rg " a > c r > _ - o o °2i cr g- g- x ro = 1, w

5 r o O C l S 8 S r r i 3

en < < ™ 3 =r £ cST < ^ " ^ n c D ^ C Q

1 " ^ 3 3 5 r! -3 q q 0 g =, -en — — u Si cu Q.0) ^ ™ ° 6 CT -i1 - - s 3 < |rc c 5 ~

0) O ||< cu "CD =- -n— CT

Si "rt>

i §Q.

1 S

CD

-1 >

1 8~D ^oCD ro

o

i

0

^J

Zj>

oo

o <-"c

0

oo <-"

c

oo

o '-"c

0

oo "-"

c

oo

o *-"

c

o

~" en

C

o

0 g

C

o0

o en

C

oo

o en

C

>o00

ro

*

Z

oCO

zJ>

ooen

C

0

o

c

o0en

C

0

oen

C2

O

oen

C

ro

cr

O

oen

C

Ooen

C

ooen

C

>ooo

ro

CO

Z

oCO

z]J>

ooen

C

ooen

C

o0en

cr

0

oen

C

ooen

C

o

en

C

O

oen

C

ooen

C

ooen

C

>ooo

ro

ro

Z

o

ZJ>

ooen

C

ooen

C

ooen

C

0

oen

c

ooen

C

o

en

C

ooen

C

ooen

C

O

oen

C

>Ooo

roro

Z

0

CO

Z^>

ooen

C

ooen

C

O

oen

C

o0en

c

ooen

C

o

en

C

O

oen

C

ooen

C

0

oen

c

>ooo

o

CD

z

0CO

z^J>

ooen

C

ooen

C

O

oen

C

O

oen

C

ooen

C

O

en

C

o0en

C

ooen

C

o0en

C

>;.

Z

1—

IT

._

1

O

u>_

Caoro0)

c

CD

CD_

m

o

m

-*

m<S

^

m

00

mho

Tl

CO

Tl

Tlicn

Page 108: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

mO

• /w O

.S. « 13 T»

CO Q «T> >- <<O 0) "*•o « m

oo

CNI

._dro

moo^~LU

oaCN

LU

<

^°LU

mT—

LU

T-r-LU

O

LU

0>LU

LU

'55

Q.

cCDCDOQOo:n

1CN

0-•t

illt<(z^

ID

oo

ID

oo

Z)

inoo

IDm0o

IDinoo

Z>

moo

z>

inoo

ID

moO

Z

no

z

CD

0iO

8<

Z)

inoo

Z)

ino0

_j

ino0

r>in0o

moo

ID

inoo

ID

in0

o

3

inoo

Z

roo

-z.

,_CN

iOoo<

ID

inoo

ID

inoo

_>

inoo

ID

inoo

inoo

ID

in0o

_,

inoo

Z>

ino0

Z

roO

Z

CM

CN

i

O

8<

0

ID

inCD

o

Z)

inoo

-O

~}

CMCD

O

Z)moo

33

inoo

z>

moo

Z>

moo

Z

o

z

00

CNI

i

Ooo<

CM

O

Z)

inoo

Zi

inoo

— >Z)inoo

Z)inoo

o

CO•<to

_Jinoo

Z)

ino0

Z

o

Z

«finCM

i

^>o<

Z)

inoo

z>

inoo

Z)

moo

35

inoo

moo

ID

inoo

ID

inoo

ID

in0

o

Z

roo

Z.

OCDCM

«

O73O<

roroo

o

0

CMCO

o

o

CO

o

o

o

10CDoQ.

sH

.oroI-

o>OL

O

Q

ooo

_J

-3

ince

ntra

tlons

8—<

•oSt>0)

a)ULno:

10a)

Est

ima

ted

n—3

£-ocoz.II3

ove

the

calib

ratio

n Ii

.0

entra

tion

a.ti

mat

ed c

ono

LUII

LU

conce

ntr

at

CDQ.

COin-oS

QnD

tt>

Q.13croO)

oQO

0)8

ed r

esul

ts e

x<

roXTCO

roc

5CM

O

alue

exc

eeds

>Mro

rocCD

5

o

alue

exc

eeds

>n.0

o>

Not

app

licab

i

n

z

CDQ-

EroenEro

ro

CDoCOtCO

II

CO1—CO

ooS C N

Q Ch- -t

Page 109: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

i Dro o

COHS

= surfa

ce wat

5crCD

>/>CD

1T>

z

, = Not apphcab

Q

crM: V

alue exceeds

OS

o^CD*

CJ

CD

II: Value exceeds

O

roq

roEJ

CO

aded results ex>

oCDCDCu

0O0

CDCU

c^CD"CD

C/)

^-jn0cfT>Q.

WCU

3"O

CDconcentr

CO

Q

mnE

stima

ted cone

en

tratio

n

CJcrO

CD

5CD

O

—crCJ

O^}

3

£-||

ZoD

CLfD

CDO

IIEstim

atf

tuQ.

CD(nc"

^0II-p

o>T>

£CDCL

<Ci)

J>rr:concentrations

c*p

O

o&o

-1oS-rjoCDC/l

oLOCD

Ln•

0U>

.

to

O

o

o

>ooo

roCDo

z

oCO

Z

ooLn

C

OUl

c

ooUl

c

oroUl

C

ooUl

c

ooUl

c

ooUl

c

>ooo

roLn^

Z

OLO

Z

OroLn

OLn

C

0Ul

cr

IX)

cr

OOLn

c

ooUl

C

ooUl

C

>oc'

roiicc

Z

OCO

z

o_i— *

0Ul

c

0oUl

c

oroUl

C

ooUl

C

ooUl

c

ooUl

c

>ooo

roro

Z

oCO

Z

00c_n

C

Ul

•"c_CT

OOUl

C

oroUl

C

ooUl

C

ooUl

c

o0Ul

c

>ooo

roro— '

Z

oCO

Z

OoUl

c

oUl

c

0oUl

c

oroUl

C

0oUl

c

ooUl

c

ooUl

c

>o0o1

0

CD

z

oLO

z

ooUl

c

oUl

c

ooUl

c

oroUl

C

00Ul

c

0oUl

c

o0Ul

c

zI

,_ 1

m

ofb

oCO

73OOO

£c

5L

i00CD

ac-a

11*

>

100

|fj

1rbm

1w

StCO00

0)CTCD

TlTlOCD

Page 110: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

mOo.Q_

CNJ

_aCO

a:

in m m m LD mo o o o o pc> o o o o o

D Z) O r> ID ID

in in m m m mo o p o p oo o o o o o

Z) Z) Z) Z) Z) 3

in in in m in inp p p p o pd d d d o d

in in in m in inp o p p p od o d d d o

Z) Z) Z) Z>

in in in in in mp p p p p pd d d d d d

~D Z> Z> Z)

in in in in in inp p p p p pd d d d d d

Z> Z)

in in mo o o

mod

Z) Z) Z) D Z) O

in m m in m mp p p p p pd d d d d d

Z 'Z. ~Z.

co co ro co co rod d d d d d

-Z. ^ ~Z.

CD •<- CN CO ••* OT- CN -<t ^t in co toO CN CN CN CN CN COV T V T T 'T O5 .2 .9 ' .2 ^ ?:8 0 o o o o co

o o o o o -x

cc

Q

O

Oin

_i

.cen

tratio

ns in

c

8—<

R =

Rej

ecte

dst

imat

ed r

esul

t,

LUn— >

co

uZ>

3 ca

libra

tion

li

CD>0-OCOCo2

ma

ted c

once

n

COUJII

LJJ

ncen

tratio

n.

8cuQ.

roCO

15nD

JO

Q.

CCO

73QO

-%

d re

sults

exc

e<

CD•oCO

w

CO

jii

oCN

lue

exce

eds

G

CO

IIro

.CO

.1u

§

lue

exce

eds

G

ro

II

.0

Jot a

pplic

able

.

*c_

II

2

stea

m s

ampl

esu

rface

wat

er

uwi-

COCNIo

Q 3;

Page 111: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

£• -ti Oro o

CO Z cr " GO O m C

CA>M

y>C=X

nft)w

ater steam s

m3

TD

o

^II

2o£)•Q~ooQJCT

it

CD

CD

CDXooCDQ.'J)

05OJo

5)

<Q)

CCD

CDXoCDCDCLCO

O

roq

CD

W

[1JQ.CDQ.

C

in

CDXoCDCDQ.

0ooCDCDZJC

T3

CD"cp_

gc"CDCL

cu3pie concentrat

Q

mC/l

5SroQ.

ooncentration a

eroroc±

<T>

Ocu

CT

S

0

zoZJ

CLroro0

J= Estim

ated

_^CD

C"•-j-.

It

CD

TDo

O>O^

CD

— O O O O O O^- Q. Q O. Q. O. Q.-rj g o g o o oC) ~L> It 1L ~L 1> I*CD ro ro t*o ro to oui O) en -t^ -t^ fo —L

o £* co ro —* cr>

Z Z z z z

o o o o o oco co co eo eo co

Z Z Z Z Z Z

o o o o o o

C C C C C C

o o o o o oo o o o o oen en en en en en

C C C C C C

O O O O O Oo o o o o oen en en en en enC C C C C C

Of

G)C(t

3

Oo

Sll.> <D O--, - a5! O o)

O

O

D£.O

•S. g. e

T)T)Oon

Page 112: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

APPENDIX B

Risk Assessment Calculation Spreadsheets

TD02-0425 2402

Page 113: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

I jbi« B 1Pisl- M rrx ui> laN'1 tu' Can IMC<J< n<< Oil Of Ha/dfdous M,)h rialsRi?C£'[tor Pi>pi la'ion Conslrut.tion A'nfVtr

eplof Aye- AdultSet' 'Hto TirtelrjrTH* FulufpSite Nonvood PCB Supt-rlund SI'P

Expo^ui!1 P nit1 Cumulative Medium-Exposure Roule Specie t-LO^s S[ e' ific Risk fo( Eacfi

Litelta^e Cancer Risk Exposure Poinl

Dcrnial AbsorplionInhalation

1 4E '52 f)E 10

e Execs'- Lifetime Cancer Risk for Construction /,i

TD02 0425/2402 Page 1 of 1 RISK CALCS ca «ls summary

Page 114: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

o(!)a.toEcu6

m co

ZJ *-O -C

_oj g>O 0)

c

o ^1 £o .?" c

ro 1?cu 5E 8

£ E"ro OECUQ

c -^ <uO -O

E oU_ CO

S3

cuQ. p

0) — -E cj; d)CD UJ03_J

(D

^ ^o z

c

8coon

Chem

ical <

3E %-C »-O O

oE

0JH

~£O

v>cu•=D

C

-S!

o

.

CO

COcpLLJ

CD

CD

O

inooen

cucro

15

CM

Oo>

en <°CD £)en ^

CO CMcp cpLLJ LLJr-~ ooh- CM

CO -<to o

O I--cn oin en0 00

^o

cu

aj PP S

1 ,2

-Dic

hlo

iC

hlo

roben

0 0O O> >

enCDen

COoLLJ

"

CO

o

CMO)inCDin

cuccu.c

1o-coQCM

5

8>

02 enCD g

CM CO0 O

LLJ LLJCO f~

co r~-

cn coo o

•* inoo oP SCM m

cuccu

cu o0) Q

11 oO »—v

Tetr

ach

lori

tran

s-1,

2-C

O Oo o> >

•* mro g

CM COo cpLLJ LUCM CD

*- in

00 •*in CMo o

CD -fr

o oO) mh- r--

0)

Pf

Tric

hlo

roel

Vin

yl C

hlo

i

0 0

> >

in

00

CMcpLLJCD

CD

^~T-

^_

CM00oCM

CU

CUNCCUno

•b£4CM

O

5CO

•<t ^t

CM CMo cpLLJ LLJT- OO•<t in

hi £o o

^ —T- CO0 h-

m ^ten m

cu cuc ccu cuN Nc cci> ci>o oo o!c ^Eo o

9 9CM CO

o oo o> >CO CO

r- CM*- CM

CM T-0 0

LLJ LLJCM in

"* "

CD

o

T- COh- CDo -<t

enh- CMCD enS CO

TfO COT- in

cuccuNCcu

0 CM

?s:•!oO CO> OCO Q-

CMCJ>CM

O

LLJinr-

CD

O

COCDTj

CDOlCMCM

CDCM

00•>t

Aro

clor-

12

mOQ.

CMenCM

cpLLJinh-

CD

O

COCDtj

CD

0)O

mCM

o

E

COoQ-

c Og -§E o- <Q. v-O. CU^ -Cco ~

t3— cu

ilCO _

^ £c cuo .c.= Q.ro 52 o> o

CU CC <»E a3 Q.o <

Q. n

fio So cc ~ra ^<•3 ?3 CUO Ec SCU CDP COS «CO -<CO <cu _*10 CO

Q. ro

coO

O

COa:

<Den

o —CO

CMOD

Page 115: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

o E

§ °3 S

. ila i2c5 g = |S E 3|3°

:II if a!O 5 Q. a < a:E 5 5 S 2 13 S o S S g» & ? « S g^5 LLJ LU QT Ct LL)

a. a>O ?

S

2 -

S P

I 5o ^

;l|u S

I 2- E

j 11

f g a

« SI ¥

w s i

iC/3 %

O c

a

2n. _

2 3 3.EQ>

O

* i 1O _j

S 5£- °

<D£U

£0)Q. U?

^ "" QJ

I1

(J

0> COI^_,1 S t0 £

u

y

c "> >

J a f1 co

c

J iT> 0)

0 O

II II 11

II?— <j5 c

c | |

> a

o c

o ^ J5> a

o a L« Q c.

0)

9 S £

£ °- c

D

^ _

3 "o> &

o ^5

c

3 ^

S siC roO U.J

J ^E a)

si>. c ^

!!"f 0u

: 0

n

lis• | §

g

§ § fcoU

aic

— 01

^£|

- gl- -K >

'IfQ)

(/)

O

of C

once

rn

SSa>j=U

0

O J C O O O O O O O O O C

U J U j L l J C l J L i J L l J l l J U J U J U J L U L L J L J L I I L . 1

i ^ r j " j » r - t » r l f O » » » - - l ' - i

o o o o o o o o o o o c ^ ~^

c e o — C D i n c n n f ^ ^ o r - O a - c r c -

^ ^ ^ o ' ^ o ' ^ i n ^ t x . r ^ r ^ o j - s i r s i

^ ? £ ^ m * S c ? S § ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' ^

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

(D CD tc

0 0 0

" ^ "o> < s i ^ - « » S - «o ^ S o , g s l n s S | o S g o o

S S S S S S S S ^ 5 S 5 " " 5

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O) f *-

O l ^ - ( N ^ l O »- *— f-- CNJ ".J ID

S o r o i S i ^ « Q Q o S * - 3 - * £ o^ s ^ ? ^ ? 8 s ^ * s ? s ^ ^

§ Q) £ •

II lo t III!* S § S 3

" Z ^ O ^ M § c e i ^ ^ T T ^K " (58 ( N I Jn"^ — ^ ^ f i o o — — —

- ^ O O H i = » - 5 - ' ^ - " - ^ < < <

o O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O t D C O c DO O O O O O O O > > > > O O C J

J

CD

\CO

*

7 i

\ •J +

~ico

"c "r ju_ •<-> LL

•£

< ^

C4 Li- -

iM00^

jjf0 0 ^ -

1 "* <f

I 1°

C* "*

||I

||l0 0 °

2* c c ™a) <n flj tc ? P cS o b c

Oa

CD ^

S ^LL 0)

C

LLI 8

55 I*| 0

^ „Q (D

i SI i|TO •! EO "* 0

(M O

0 " uo i. c

ra

6

a>

8in"gg1OOyra

Q

m ~

J>

I ^

Page 116: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

X

•n

I s4> U

0

to•a

a 3D UL

10m gf

£) U t

m "8 |§ ^

I =s 2a S g

IS

jj3 -0 0

_ p c O0) fX 3— ^ o c

? l"l° « S |0 2 a £

01 0) >.E = = 2

ill!I £ uj a

§

§S

1

?!< °~

g. 5

a: uj

a o

- 5"

I £

O

,

^ n

<r> a

" !

re

S|

•O_ ii

(M

° ?to

o

1 1

IIItoII U

£ £

ps!a.

;

S I

Its

5 i-"• ~

uj -< oZ 0>

BC CL

a5 Sa> c ^

go>

>- -C

0.1

i a

IIILLl Q_

E sl£||

si< 0s, U

^ £|w r>c j?

w >

a> —

S - £3 ® aD > '

3 ^ E3 °|<

^

il

E

g0

"o

3?a>cO

3C Q.

I S

: s '-~ sss: ^ ^!r

g 5 3 8 8 8

r Z ' - ^ Z Z Z r - j Z ' z ' - - * o o c ,

O O O C C O O O O O O O O O O

L L J U J l l J L J J L l J L I J U J U J U J L i J U J L l J U J U J U J

^ r ^ ^ S - S ^ ^ s ^ ^ : " S

««„«„« „«««„« , „ „ „f r . n r o f o . o r t n t o t r . t o n n n n r t

s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

_ ^ 2 S S

liiiiiiigiiiSii• I " 1 !„ „ „1 1 . 1 i 1 « I ? ? 1^ JP £ ^ — o £ * ° - 9 - S o r ^ ( D —E S c ^ * o £ ^ 2 ^ X ^ ^ * " *

- ^ ^ 9 5 ^ 9 ^ = z z f i ' : T 7 ' Z^ Q ^ ^ m * ^ — ^ " " ( S O O — — -^

^ ^ O O K ^ K > ^ ^ - - - < < <

u o o uO U O O O U U O O O O O t n a J t DO O O O O O O O > > > > O O O

iTO

!?

trQJg

O

aJ

a>

UJ

y

Sco0-

ca:

5

1UJ

Page 117: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

o>

> 3 a

O JF

& g f

E0,

y "" s

tOJ

M „ M

^ ^ 5t^ &•p- « £f I|

S3 s-1

3 ro £-5

a* o; c

111ID J?

a

0 o*- o E

1 I?5"

U

§ g5 3C 0 „

S E§ 2? ao 3 "% w *

5 I Ia> S

5 _

aJ

c

§

cal o

f Coi

^o

S

1 1J O

o o o o o o o o o o o o

O t D O O O t D O O O O O O

L U l L J L L I U J L J U J U J U J U J t U U J L U ^ ^ ^O r M O > O O ' - O t N ' - » - O ) O > ^ - l i - •*1

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OU J U J U J U J L U i l J L I J U J U J U J L l J U J L l J l l J t J Jo o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

S s s s s S s S s s s S s S s

01 to •-

lllllllllllllll±r QJ13 c a,

ll I gl Illljfijjiiflifipf^ • ^ T ™ c u ^ * - * S " ' R ' S ' R- - O u ( - i = K > » - » - * - - < < <

<J O O OO U C J U O O O O O O O O m o D c DO O O O O O O O > > > > U O O

-f

3

£

Ii

Page 118: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

? SisS

5 SI cO g

gO

s *g5 g I

E 5u

u£ ^

< S ^

Q. TOUJ *~ 5^

u. « EUJ <£> -5.

T)

-o

nj —1

> 3 ?O

0$ *

ill& E

o

an

ab

ie S

ymbols

ara

me

ter

Valu

es

Para

mete

r U

nas

••

> a

« 1cr c

» |ij js tZJ g ,1

1

1^1

g L

O

§'S i

5 S>

1 o S

uj

illx 2 -c

gS O _l

1 ?g

co

" H Bl

3 S EgO

CA

S N

um

be

io0

3

o

3; Q

6 O

UJ ' UJ

"2 ?,

c o c o o

" J z z z z z z ^ z z z z ^ ^ 1 ! ^ 1

•~ "* "~ -~ •-

o o o o o o o o o o o o < < <

c n ^ - w ^ ^ c o r ^ i n ^ o ^ ^

. o j n j n s p ^ j n ^ ^ o p p j o p j o

r ^ c N ^ - i ^ ^ N o j c N ^ r M r N . ^ r s . ^

S S S S S S S S S S ^ ^ S S S

o o o o o o o o o o o o

U J U J U J U J L U U J I I J U J U J U J L I J U J ^ Z Z

-M <o ^ x c r ; ^ ^ ^

or " J o° J

r , o ' ' ) oo S S ^

O O S J O ^ - t O O O O t O ' - i D ^ i O O

^ Q>O 0) £ ^

c— S £ ® o» o <»2 § I « g g £ § £si s fll g „! § 1 .5s|||$|||||||g?X

|l|S| ||||||lli•-" •-" O o t- i H >--''-" " — " < < <

U U U U O U O O O O O O C O t D C DO O O O O O O O > > > > U O O- > > > > > > ^ > > C / ) t O t O i / ) Q . f l . Q .

o

S

ccS

S

I

S

UJ

1a

1r±

UJ

£ft5

co

fsCD

Iiooca0<v

OC

= S

erm

vo

latil

>-

S c

3|

f f

3o y. n>

CT

so75 •=

> 3c >

0) *• <J

S Z §

II

Page 119: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Table B 6Ri<^ Surnnur\ Tnblf for Car, in xjrnic Oil or Hn/^rdous MjtonjKRe^t'ptrn PupulHlion ConMruttir-n W-fl-erReref t{ i Afjp AdvjllSerrano TIUH fr,,'no Futur*1

Sil*1 NorwOO'i PCB Supt'ffund Sitt-

E'pasute RouleE»['osurf

Specrdt, M iCurnuldtt^e Ha/,ifd

Index tor FarhExposure Point

Dermal Abscjfptioninhalation

2 7E*U1: *E 04

M,i"imuin Cumulalive Hazard Index (Of Construction Vv irker = 2 7E<01

TD02-04?5/24/02 Page 1 of 1 RISK CALCS - nc *ls summary

Page 120: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

SII B i l l :luis -Sl f^ l i lo

, a- S ? § JS < o,

•PHIL"*I S e l l s S l

J S 3 8 S 8 S "g 2 S » g & g £- [ ^ ^ ^ L u u j c r Q :

•" i;

ll m - SL QT u c

6 £o

£D

m _ a. _

|| 2 g^

9o

s -& 3 u g E

g £ °°-O

I*£ E S 5

* <§ £5; u or

0

f a? a, uj

o ** — —!? g "" 3 H"" < c

5

I sl•5 2 °> S _i* 1 i <i ?° g , ego : 2

o

a g g

i— uj *•* y pt? 1 -c

— ' I -C1 &1

c 5 11 2 IQ *

Q O^

II eE H H II

"c > 7i tt> —0) W 2 D C> ' fl "S "Dni (N C (8 — '

-I !>!9 ill> ^

S co — a0 - >

S >

S Sbo x4. t

|||

f11- ^

Is c3 s cQ> (]J C

|S-

o ^S S Ec ro Do u.J

I ^

>. c ^

111B o b

P 1 °O

? °

s is3 S iL <

S

^ g ^ 'go

^ _i

s111!

5 Sl

O o*~

^•pzto5

iio•53

u

S

O C O O O - ^ O O O O C C T O O O

U J L L J L L . L L J L J J J ! U U J L U J J l J J l J J l L J t l J U

rj ,-M «- -j ^- - CO .D - - - i-l - C-4 CO

o o c o o o o o o o a o ^ o o

-a.^Jo,;^,^^^B s " s s S s = s ? 2 ? 2 s ? i s

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo o o o c o o c o o o o c o o

8§°8°8° i ° | ° °555

to i£> <O

CM n co 01 " oo

0 0 0 0 0 0

o O O o O O

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 -,-,-,

S S K o S K S S o o S g g S S

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O) to «—

ililliiiiiilil!? g

g 1 1 I I j » «

- I B 1 1 i « | ? 1 12s c fe£ ft S « x -S •§ *^ x f B ^ ^ ^ S ^ f e f e S S wy ^ Q ) Q 2 ( N 02 c Z Z Z T T T

S Q ° ^ ^ ^ J O 4 5 5 6 - ^ ^ - ^T-* M 2 «S « ° c tN ' rv i tA^ 1 o o o'-"'-" O 0 1- i )->—"--" - - " ^- < < <

o o o oO O O U O C J C J O O O O O m t D C QO O O O O O O O > > > > O U U

ir-7CO

CD

C

_ S

S rg

imi *^

?1u. •U u.

? Q

2 ^?NJ U- —

iisO O rfII II 0

JJIQ Q —

"_

jjg

| S |

||lO O °

U U C» c c ^

1 fe ?1

a.

5CD

0 |UJ ^

LL QUJ OJ

< ICO c

J I<t -*•

o1 ^C T3fO , C

Z ™* O

Q " U0 - I

Ol

6-=

1

1If)

O0

IDC

1<Jerea

. 6i »8 re

1 >

I1 §

Page 121: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

i o> 2:

ffl< o

rj <->

E Q

— i? S1

Q r g

O £O

• in >.

IS?

,uj "~ a>_

LL iTt -*.

s

re> r |^ CD

>0)

tf> §

-O 0>S ^

J "5 {^** o E

- g

« » »

ts 1

10 ™ Sa, 2 5Sll;= n> n>^? TO Q>> Q.

0 ^ ^

< ^ ^j L. c

| f >a ^ o0 0) L

£ c

o

UJ ^< Cn

Z 0)- e

o £» 0

c1 y 5

|i

p O Q,

m |"

I«sX 11 >

UJ

£ u *-3 c rii;X 01 (T

C C "Cs!l

Ei< 0o 0

? S SLO Q

t ro

w 'c3 - D3 C >

b « o§ ^

w

?lJ Z

c

g

B

u

3

!l

, , „ ^ , , „ _ „U L J L U U J U J U J — L l J U J U J j j ^ j i l j

- . ' . " " " i - - " ^ S '

UJUJlUL iJL lJL lJ^ lJJ lJJUJ^ ^ UJUJLU

^ ^ " ^ ^ ^ °°S °J S J

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

L J L U U J U J U J L l J U J L l J U J U J U J U J L l J L l J U J

o £ ! S S ! 2 S S S S 1 8 £ S ! 2 5 S

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

S S S J S S S S S S I S S S S S ^

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

OJ i£) --i- a> o>

i ill IlliiSlisi^ J ° ^ ^ ? ? ^ ^ ^ ? ^ J ^ £ r i ^ f ^

§ ? .? g | | | . . „

j||Ifijjll|J!pH?i5Ji l j f=???! lS

0u o o o u o o o o o o O t n m a DO O O O O O O O > > > > O O ( J

UJ

''

-J

3r01

oco

Ja

a>

8a:a>

§a

Page 122: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

1 I

e

i?

<S 3

s t1 3 feS 3 <»

"3 |

.0U- UJ 5O o o>

i0.

u « s0 £ Q

E

II U II

(A V ID

3 3 C

<S) ^ *

ill-J? ra Q-> a

g

S b_iC S

0

Ittp a £s g S

1!

£ s P£ S .tg™ 5u.O

|s| (0^S 2 aU §*•n (/) o

2*?sisIs—

k-s

< D

C

henncal

of C

once

O

ilJ> O

O O O O O O O O O O O O

U t U J L U U J L J U J U J U J U J U J U J U J ^ Z Z

L n i C T - m i T i i n i n ^ o i r i r - - ! - -

o o o o o o o o o o o oL J J U J U J U J U J U J U J L l l U J U J U J U J ^ ^ ^

"" "^g g g g g g g g g g g g g g go o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

ininininininminin^m^ininir)

lOioininininintninininoiKiJiin

a,» ^o f ^ - C N ^ i i n i- ^ - r ^ r ^ o g S

g O J O O J C O O t O t f N ^ n t O O T C J g .

^ J ^ ^ ^ ^ S f ^ ^ c S X ^ i n ^ ^

3 = « ,o * a» c* ~ £ £ § ? ? §g j £ < c g c S t s S

S l g l U g - l s s I1 |s| lg2||«|«ssaf 1 1 a | ° g I f || I a a s^Hilll^sflii^ - U o ^ - i = t - > - - - - < < <

U O O UU O O O O O O O O O O O t O C D C Oo o o o o o o o > > > > o u o> > > > > > > > w c o c o c o a . Q . Q .

CP

i!

Page 123: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

a>CO

1.

B-9

ivoo

d P

CB

Sup

erfi

Tim

efra

me

Futu

r

o oz ra

*> cCO •= U- in co

11so

ilU 0)

1 £

(D

1g

s sSSI

Gro

undw

ater

Med

ium

G

roun

dP

oint

G

roun

dwa

Pop

ulat

ion

C

ons

Age

A

dult

Rou

te

inha

latio

n

E llstlT|> CL a u u aa? x x a w x

I 'irc "> ?S s ?o Et: 0)

|SI

D- raUJ ^

Li- LO >,

"O

Ira — '

> 3 traO

G

Is.i s ?Q. E

.c0

II II II€ « f

fe > ?

c 1 is™ m Q-> Q_

0 2

M p =

^ §§

c'og f

If?e o)

c ? c

o ^

oO

8P i_ f"

c < '-Q) c C

& "U

1 Sai a

I^S

il

CD

5 0 ^

x 0. >III

Exp

osur

eF

requ

ency

1 ^= ™ 6o

15 5_J

r 1 f

u

£Q

z

**

E

o

3I6

3: Q-

) O

•"• CD O O O

„„„

< < 3 < < < < 5 5 5 < 5 < < s

Z 2 o 2 z Z Z o O o Z o 2 Z I ICM ^ CM f*4 (C

o o o o o o o o o o o oU J U J U J U J L U U J U J U J U J L U U J U J 4 * '

^ ^ ^ r 0 , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

s s s s s s s s -s g s s s s

£ S , S S S £ S S S S S S S £

o o o o o o o o o o o o

U J U J U J L L I U J L 1 J U J U J L 1 J U J L U U J 2 * ^ Z

c o ^ - ^ ^ i n . n ^ c R ^ i - h -

g ^ o ^ g o " o S g g ° Z Z 2

OJ (D ^-- O) Ol

o S S S ) * S ^ 2 S 5 P 5 « S r ^ r "c p T h o i n t N J r i S B K t M i n j o r o r v j ^

75 ¥

<i> 2 c 1? *

|j||f|I|ll||Hgc ^ S 0 ^ 0 ' 1 i ^ ^ - n S S ^ ^ ^5r5 g^1 C^|^5o69|| |

- - 6 S ^ ™ K § ! ^ ^ - - < < <

O O O O U O O O O O O O c o o a m

';'

»

T^J

r

1

&

^

"*

5.

j3

tr

3oa

UJ

5d B

ohen/i

§0

a.

fOoa

oa.£

O

cS6a?

T)"o

Ia(/I

OO

CO

O) "O

siQ, C

<31 |

01

3 °

S H-> 0

0 ^£ z o

Page 124: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

APPENDIX C

Development of the Volatilization Factor

TD02-0-I25'24'02

Page 125: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

CM Standing Crounch^ater to Ambient Air in an Open Air Excavation

A quanti tat ive approach was developed to evaluate this exposure pathway using a volatil ization factor(VF) The VF is defined as the ratio of the concentration of the dissolved chemical in the groundwater tothe concentration of that chemical in the ambient air breathing space. Some general assumptions for thismodel are as follows

• VF was derived using Equation 59, from Section 3 1 2: "Air Dispersion Models, in the SoilScreening Guidance Technical Background Document" (USEPA, 1996).

• The emission rate from the surface of the standing groundwater was assumed to beessentially constant over a range of concentrations observed at the site when normalized tothe concentration of the volatile in the groundwater The chemical-specific emission rateswere calculated using the WATERS model (USEPA, 1995).

• Air concentrations were developed using a gaussian plume-based dispersion factor tailored tothe size and geographic location of the excavation area.

The equation derivation is as follows:

Q/ = J-<

/c Cair CF3

where:

Q/C = Inverse of Mean Concentration at the Center of a Square Emission Source[g/sec-m^kg/m1)]

Jave = Average rate of contaminant flux from the surface of the pooled groundwater[g/sec-m2]

Cair = Volatile chemical concentration in the ambient air above the excavation [mg/m3]CF3 = Conversion Factor [1 kg/1,000,000 mg]

Jave can be expressed as a contaminant flux normalized to the contaminant concentration in thegroundwater as follows:

/ — / (^J ave ~ J aveN *- g>\

where:

JaxeN = Volatile emission rate calculated using the WATERS Model (USEPA, 1995) normalizedto the area of the excavation bottom and the maximum dissolved volatile chemicalconcentration in the groundwater [(g/sec-m2)/(mg/L)]

Cgw = Concentration of the dissolved volatile compound in the groundwater [mg/L]

Substituting the Jaxe equation into the Q/C equation, it becomes the following:

O/ ^ aveN 'Cg»

% = -£^oir

FD02 0425 2-4 02

Page 126: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

Rearranging the equation and remembering that the \olat i l i7at ion factor is defined as the ratio of theconcentration of the dissolved chemical in ground\\ater to the concentration oi the volat i l ized chemicalin the ambient air breathing space, the following equation is derived

crs

where

VF™ Volatilization Factor from pooled groundwater to the breathing space above an open airexcavation [m3/L]

The parameters used to evaluate the VF lor the open-air excavation are shown in Table 5-3 Theparameters used to calculate Ja i lN using WATERS are shown below in Table C-l J a % eN is calculated byusing the results from the WATERS Model (USEPA, 1995) normalized to the area of the excavationbottom and the maximum dissolved volatile chemical concentration in the groundwater

Table C-lInput Parameters for WATERS:

Standing Groundwater to Ambient Airin an Open Air Excavation

ParameterGroundwater FlowRate

General BiorateWind Speed Over theWaterExposed WaterTemperatureUnit SelectedLength of ExcavationWidth of ExcavationDepth of ExcavationDepth of Water inExcavationTime for EmissionsFrom Excavation

Value1 5xl0 4

5451 5

25

Lagoon12510030 1

3

Unitsm3/sec

mg/g Bio-hrcm/sec

C

mmmm

months

CommentBased on the groundwater seepage velocity(3 3 ft/day) presented in the RI (Ebasco, 1989)assumed to flow through the broadside cross-section of the excavationConservative minimum valueEquivalent to 10 1 mph above the excavation(Average wind speed for Worchester, MA)Typical value

Most appropriate.Site-specific assumption.Site-specific assumption.Site-specific assumptionApproximately equal to 4 inches.

Equivalent to actual total exposure time for theconstruction worker scenario when an openexcavation and standing groundwater might exist.

TD02 0-425 2-102

C-2

Page 127: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

APPENDIX D

Annotated Responses to Review Commentson Draft Amendment to the Supplemental Risk Assessment

TD02-0-I25/24 02

Page 128: FINAL AMENDMENT TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT · A Supplemental Risk Assessment was completed in 2000 by Foster Wheeler as an update and revision to the 1998 Groundwater Risk

FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATIONTOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT (TERC)

CONTRACT NO. DACW33-94-D-0002, NORWOOD PCB SUPERFUND SITE

ANNOTATED RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS

The following are responses to USACE review comments on the Draft Amendment to the SupplementalRisk Assessment for the Norwood PCB Superfund Site, dated April 2002. The comments are provided initalic type followed by Foster Wheeler's responses in bold type.

Reviewer: C.A. Opdyke - USACE Date: May 21,2002

Comment 1: For purposes of clarity and transparency the intake equations should be included in thetext of Section 5, the exposure assessment. These equations currently appear in thetables in the appendix but the reader has to hunt for them.

Response: The intake equations for dermal absorption and inhalation have been added in thetext of Section 5. Note that these equations also appear on Table 5-1.

Comment 2: Table 5-1 - a reference or "source" should be listed for values ofKp (most likely RAGSPart E, Appendix B).

Response: This reference has been added as footnote [8| on Table 5-1.

Comment 3: Table 5-3 - the Pooled Groundwater Temperature used in this table appears high,especially given the fact that the mean ambient air temperature for Worcester, MA(as taken from the NOAA websitehttp://w\vw.erh.noaa.sov/er/box/climate/WORCESTER_MA .html)-for the three warmest months of the year is approximately 20 degrees centigrade. Tin'svalue should be changed.

Response: The pooled groundwater temperature has been modified to 20°C. This parameterdid not have a significant effect on the emission rate (Jave)(see Table 5-4). Thischange also did not affect the risk calculations and thus, the conclusions of thereport have not changed.

Comment 4: Page ES-1, second paragraph, line 6 - the word "Risks " should be changed to "Risk".

Response: This correction has been made.

Comment 5: Page 6-1, third paragraph, line 2 - repeated word "that". Insert "to" in place of first"that".

Response: This correction has been made.

TD02-042 App D5/24 02