final

51
An Investigation of Motivated Learning Strategy Use in a WebQuest Classroom - A Case of University of Technology in Central Taiwan Advisor: Dr. Po -Yi Hung Advisee: Shin-Yi Liao Date: May 25, 2010

Upload: cyut

Post on 21-Dec-2014

51 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final

An Investigation of Motivated Learning Strategy Use in a WebQuest Classroom

- A Case of University of Technology in Central Taiwan

Advisor: Dr. Po -Yi Hung

Advisee: Shin-Yi Liao

Date: May 25, 2010

Page 2: Final

Here comes your footer

Contents

2

IV. Results

IIV. Conclusions

I. IntroductionII. Literature Review

III. Methodology

Page 3: Final

Here comes your footer

Introduction

3

Background of the Study

Statement of the Problem

Purposes of the Study

Research Questions

Significance of the Study

Definition of Terms

Page 4: Final

Here comes your footer

Background of the Study The most interesting and important innovation in education in recent years is the widespread introduction of computers into K-12 schools, colleges and universities.

(Zheng, Perez, Williamson, & Flygare, 2008)

4

Page 5: Final

Here comes your footer Page 5

Background of the Study

If technology is an important part to the future success of our students, it makes sense that it should also be an important part of our instruction.

(Strickland, 2005)

5

Page 6: Final

Here comes your footer

Students do not know for what purpose to learn during their learning period, thus, come to have the problem on knowing the ways to successfully achieve the goal.

(Moore, 2004)

6

Statement of the Problem

Page 7: Final

Here comes your footer

Purposes of the Study

- to investigate the English learning strategies use by English major students at the college level in a WebQuest environment

7

What learning strategies do English major students apply when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?

What learning strategies do English major students apply when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?

Page 8: Final

Here comes your footer

Purposes of the Study

- to examine the relationship between English learning strategies and learning motivation in a WebQuest environment

8

Is there any significance between leaning strategies use and motivation among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?

Is there any significance between leaning strategies use and motivation among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?

Page 9: Final

Here comes your footer

Purposes of the Study

- to explore the motivated learning strategies use in English teaching and learning field in a WebQuest environment

9

Page 10: Final

Here comes your footer Page 10

Significance of the Study

- to offer teachers directions to encourage students and arise students’ learning interests in a WebQuest environment

10

Page 11: Final

Here comes your footer Page 11

Definition of Terms

WebQuest

“An inquiry-oriented activity in which some or all of the information that learners interact with comes from resources on the internet.”

(Dodge, 1995)

11

Page 12: Final

Here comes your footer

Definition of Terms

12

WebQuest Environment

The participants complet the task by the use of a website to accomplish the final project based on WebQuest Approach.

Page 13: Final

Here comes your footer

Literature Review

13

WebQuest Application

Motivated Learning Strategies

Page 14: Final

Here comes your footer

Understanding of the student’s learning approaches can benefit the learning efficiency for students.

(Wolfe, Bates, Manikowske, & Amundsen, 2006)

Motivated Learning Strategies

14

Page 15: Final

Here comes your footer

They use WebQuest to teach literary criticism in a high English classroom.

(Rozema and Robert, 2001)

WebQuest Application

15

Page 16: Final

Here comes your footer

Methodology

16

Research Design

Procedures of the Study

WebQuest Approach

WebQuest Application

Procedures of the Course

Learning Strategy immersion

Page 17: Final

Here comes your footer Page 17

Duration

17

50 minutes / a week

Page 18: Final

Here comes your footer Page 18

Location

Course:Internet Resources for English Teachers

Room: T2-505

18

Page 19: Final

Here comes your footer Page 19

Participants

19

Junior Senior Total

Male 1 12 13

Female 8 30 38

Total 9 42 51

Percentage (%) 17.65 82.35 100

Table 1The Distribution of Participants (n = 51)

Page 20: Final

Here comes your footer

Criteria

The Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI) is a tool for eliciting ratings and comments from learning resource evaluators.

(Belfer, Leacock, & Nesbit, 2004)

20

Page 21: Final

Here comes your footer

LORI Manual Version 1.5

Reliability : .70~.90

21

(Belfer, Leacock, & Nesbit, 2004)

Page 22: Final

Here comes your footer

Zimmer Twins

This website is presented for informational, educational and entertainment purposes.

(Zimmer Twins, 2010)

22

Page 23: Final

Here comes your footer

2006 Webby Awards

The site has been nominated as a finalist in the 2006 Webby Awards.

(Zinc, 2010)

23

Page 24: Final

Here comes your footer

Procedures of the Study

24

Test Questionnaire

Conduct studyTrain students

Create project

Collect MSLQ Analyze Date

Page 25: Final

Here comes your footer Page 25

WebQuest Approach

Unambiguous Process

Related Resources

Clear Tasks

Attractive Introduction

Reflective Conclusion

Standard Criteria

25

(Dodge, 1995)

Page 26: Final

Here comes your footer Page 26

WebQuest Application

Offer the Teaching Manual

Provide Links

Create a Story

Introduce Zimmer Twins

Website

Leave Feedbacks

Follow Criteria

26

Page 27: Final

Here comes your footer Page 27

Procedures of the Course

2week

3-8week

11-12week

13week

9week

10week

1week

Introducing

Practicing

Creating

Evaluating

Revising

Adding

Uploading

27

Page 28: Final

Here comes your footer

9 Learning Strategies

28

9 strategies immersed in a WebQuest task

a re-doable website allows students to practice1. Rehearsal

cute and vivid pictures to make the project fancy2. Elaboration

a logic setting to complete a whole story3. Organization

a conversational style, content arrangement is needed4. Critical Thinking

Page 29: Final

Here comes your footer

Learning Strategy Immersion

29

9 strategies immersed in a WebQuest task

Criteria of the story creation for weekly assignment6. Time and Study Management

a scoring project7. Effort Management

a group work in a technology room8. Peer Learning

an instructor and a teacher assistant are provided 9. Help Seeking

5. Meta-cognitive and self-regulation

a project task pushed students to be aware of their doing

Page 30: Final

Here comes your footer Page 30

Data Collection

Questionnaire Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire - Revised Version (79 items)

Time 30 minutes

Validity 1. Verified Factor Analysis (KMO =.61 - .84)2. Expert Validity

Reliability Cronbach alpha = .96

Measurement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

(Not at all true of me Very true of me)

30

Page 31: Final

Here comes your footer

LMS Online System

31

Page 32: Final

Here comes your footer Page 32

Data Analysis

32

Pearson Correlation Multiple RegressionDescriptive Statistics

Q1

What learning strategies do English major students apply when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?

Q3

What motivated learning strategies used to stimulate learning in a WebQuest environment?

Q2

Is there any significance between leaning strategies use and motivation among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?

Page 33: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

33

Statistical Results

Discussions

Students’ Perceptions

Final Project Sharing

Page 34: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

34

No. Strategy M SD1 Critical thinking 5.57 0.822 Elaboration 5.24 0.863 Help seeking 5.16 1.054 Meta-cognition and self-regulation 5.12 0.855 Time and study management 4.95 0.696 Organization 4.92 1.117 Rehearsal 4.84 1.178 Peer learning 4.73 1.249 Effort 4.13 0.93

Table 2Frequency, Distribution of the Learning Strategy Subscale (n = 51)

What learning strategies do English major students apply when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?What learning strategies do English major students apply when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?

Page 35: Final

Here comes your footer

Discussion

35

Page 36: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

36

No. Learning Strategy r Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking .669 .000***2 Elaboration .733 .000***3 Help seeking .294 .018*4 Meta-cognition and self-regulation .686 .000***5 Time and study management .216 .064 6 Organization .420 .001**7 Rehearsal .583 .000***8 Peer learning .500 .000***

Table 3Correlation Between Learning Strategies and Motivation (n = 51)

Is there any significance between leaning strategies use and motivation among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?Is there any significance between leaning strategies use and motivation among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?

Note. ***p < .001.

Page 37: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

37

No. Learning Strategy T value Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking .454 .6522 Elaboration 8.209 .000(***)3 Help seeking .362 .7194 Meta-cognition and self-regulation 2.315 .0255 Organization -.171 .8656 Rehearsal .454 .6527 Peer learning -.171 .865

Note. ***p < .001.

Table 4Regression on Learning Strategies and Intrinsic Goal Orientation (n = 51)

If teachers want to increase students’ intrinsic goal orientation, elaboration skill might help.

What motivated learning strategies used to stimulate learning among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?What motivated learning strategies used to stimulate learning among English major students learning in a WebQuest environment?

Page 38: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

38

No. Learning Strategy t Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking 1.546 .1292 Elaboration .119 .9063 Help seeking 1.231 .2244 Meta-cognition and self-regulation 5.375 .000(***)5 Organization .520 .6066 Rehearsal 1.098 .2787 Peer learning 1.079 .286

Table 5Regression on Learning Strategies and Extrinsic Goal Orientation (n = 51)

If teachers want to increase students’ extrinsic goal orientation, meta-cognition and self-regulation skill might help.

Note. ***p < .001.

Page 39: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

39

No. Learning Strategy t Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking .989 .3272 Elaboration 7.301 .000(***)3 Help seeking -1.881 .0664 Meta-cognition and self-regulation 1.439 .1575 Organization -2.189 .0346 Rehearsal -.151 .8817 Peer learning -.446 .658

Table 6Regression on Learning Strategies and Task Value (n = 51)

If teachers want to increase students’ task value, elaboration skill might help.

Note. ***p < .001.

Page 40: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

40

No. Learning Strategy T value Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking 1.235 .2232 Elaboration 4.908 .000(***)3 Help seeking -2.370 .0224 Meta-cognition and self-regulation .588 .5595 Organization -1.723 .0926 Rehearsal -.608 .5467 Peer learning 3.598 .001(***)

Table 7Regression on Learning Strategies and Learning Beliefs (n = 51)

If teachers want to increase students’ learning beliefs, elaboration, and peer learning might help.

Note. ***p < .001.

Page 41: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

41

No. Learning Strategy T value Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking 5.262 .000(***)2 Elaboration 2.004 .0513 Help seeking -1.105 .2754 Meta-cognition and self-regulation .124 .2205 Organization -.225 .8236 Rehearsal -.277 .7837 Peer learning .706 .483

Table 8Regression on Learning Strategies and Self-efficacy for learning and performance (n = 51)

If teachers want to increase students’ self-efficacy, critical thinking skill might help.

Note. ***p < .001.

Page 42: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

42

No. Learning Strategy T value Sig. (1-tailed)1 Critical thinking -.610 .5442 Elaboration -.165 .8693 Help seeking -1.366 .1784 Meta-cognition and self-regulation -1.056 .2965 Organization -.146 .8856 Rehearsal 2.710 .009(**)7 Peer learning .139 .890

Table 9Regression on Learning Strategies and Anxiety (n = 51)

If teachers want to decrease students’ anxiety, rehearsal skill might help.

Note. **p < .01.

Page 43: Final

Here comes your footer

Results

43

What are the English major students’ perceptions of learning when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?What are the English major students’ perceptions of learning when they are doing the project in a WebQuest environment?

Figure 1. Distribution of task-taking attitudes (n = 51).

84.31%

15.69%

Page 44: Final

Here comes your footer

Comments

44

A comment from documents reveals students‘ learning attitude on the project which holds the postive perception states that:

Student AStudent A

It’s really an interesting website! Not only for children, but adults must love it, too.

Student BStudent B

In this website, I can make movie by myself. It is so cool for me.

Page 45: Final

Here comes your footer

Comments

45

Comments from documents reveal students‘ learning attitude on facing the diffculties when completing the project states that:

Student CStudent C

Sometimes, I cannot find the pictures in that I want to put in my film, so I have to change my ideas, it’s really bad.

Student DStudent D

Sometimes when I couldn’t find the action or facial expression, I’ll get angry!!!

Page 46: Final

Here comes your footer

Final Project Sharing

46

Page 47: Final

Here comes your footer

Conclusions

Summary

Limitations

Suggestions

47

Page 48: Final

Here comes your footer

Summary

48

1. WebQuest is one of the way to train students’ critical thinking.

2. Different strategies used could stimulate different motivation

to learn.

Page 49: Final

Here comes your footer

Limitations

49

1. Limited sample size

2. Limited in one class

3. Limited in a technological environment

Page 50: Final

Here comes your footer

Suggestions

50

Page 51: Final

Here comes your footer Page 51

Thank You for Your Attention.