Upload File

fewer can be more - nuclear safety and security …...fewer can be more - nuclear safety and...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • Fewer can be more - Nuclear safety and security …...Fewer can be more - Nuclear safety and security culture self-assessment in the Hungarian Public Ltd. for Radioactive Waste Management
1
Fewer can be more - Nuclear safety and security culture self-assessment in the Hungarian Public Ltd. for Radioactive Waste Management K. HORVÁTH 1 , M. SOLYMOSI 2 (presenter) , GY . V ASS 3 1 Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority (HAEA) Budapest, Hungary, 2 National University of Public Service Budapest, Hungary, 3 National Directorate General for Disaster Management, Ministry of the Interior (NDGDM) Budapest, Hungary, 1 [email protected] , 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected] Although there is a relationship between nuclear safety and security culture, especially in the process and methods, these connections were researched detailed only in recent years. The large amount of connections between safety and security culture inspired me to research a new methods and test them in practice. The presented self-assessment was conducted in August-September 2015 at the Public Limited Company of Radioactive Waste Management (PURAM) and was entirely based on both domestic and international [1-5] guidance. Although the entire self-assessment was initiated, laid out and conducted by myself, beside that “behind the scene” obviously there were a lot of cooperation and communication. To determine the optimal method together with the management, that is responsible for the nuclear security and safety divisions. We agreed in order to the higher out fill ratio on a “traditional” paper based survey. The applied techniques and innovations: The presented method is appropriate to combine different guidance and characteristics, to measure safety and security attitudes with a single survey. The first Hungarian combined self-assessment that was originally applied by three different INSAG-15, GS-G-3.5 and NST 026 guidance. Between two characteristics the more visible the lines are, the stronger the connections. As it can be seen on the table, every action, opinion and attitude has an effect on the characteristics by the different guides. About 3-5 indicator of every characteristic was compared from all the Guidance. The point of the chart is no other to demonstrate the huge number of connections between safety and security culture characteristics. Although GS-G-3.5 created new characteristics, but every action and opinion are fit into both guidance, just have to be categorised different, which explains the large number of connections. Independent questions, which were related to both, nuclear safety and security culture indicators and was a combination of them. The given answer about the question determines the result of both, one or more safety and security culture characteristic. Dependent questions. These can be related to only one, either a safety or a security culture characteristic. (Information security) A significant connection shows whether and how strongly answers and pairs of variables are related. I made clusters and examine the connections between answers and all of their attributes. If the connection was significant and the average of the answer was low or extremely high, than further analysis or assessment is required. To point to a strong and weak characteristic, the strength and weaknesses of the organisation. This kind of correlation analysis is capable to show the trends of these strength and weaknesses inside the organisation. The relations of the characteristics of different guidance Attributes/ Characteristics Age Position Time at the org. Safety is a clearly recognized value Weaker Stronger No correlation Leadership for safety is clear Weaker Stronger No correlation Accountability for safety is clear Weaker Stronger No correlation Safety is integrated into all activities Weaker Stronger No correlation Safety is learning driven Weaker Stronger No correlation Correlation analysis Process of the self-assessment 1. IAEA International Safety Advisory Group 15: Key practical issues to strengthen safety culture, Vienna (2002), 2. IAEA: The Management System for Nuclear Installations, Safety guide, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-3.5, Vienna, (2009) http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1392_web.pdf 3. IAEA: NSS 07 Implementing Guide, Nuclear security culture, Vienna, 2008 http://ww w-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1347_web.pdf 4. IAEA: NST 026 Technical Guidance, Self-assessment of nuclear security culture in facilities and activities - DRAFT, Vienna, (2014) http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/ security/security-series-drafts/tech-guidance/nst026.pdf 5. IAEA: NST 027 Technical Guidance NOT AN OFFICIAL DRAFT, Enhancing nuclear security culture in organisation associated with nuclear and/or radioactive material, Vienna, November 2015 version

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fewer can be more - Nuclear safety and security …...Fewer can be more - Nuclear safety and security culture self-assessment in the Hungarian Public Ltd. for Radioactive Waste Management

Fewer can be more - Nuclear safety and securityculture self-assessment in the Hungarian Public

Ltd. for Radioactive Waste ManagementK. HORVÁTH1, M. SOLYMOSI2 (presenter), GY. VASS3

1Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority (HAEA) Budapest, Hungary, 2National University of Public Service Budapest, Hungary,

3National Directorate General for Disaster Management, Ministry of the Interior (NDGDM) Budapest, Hungary, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Although there is a relationship between nuclear safety and security culture, especially in the process and methods, these connections were researched detailed only in recent years. The large amount of connections between safety and security culture inspired me to research a new methods and test them in practice. The presented self-assessment was conducted in August-September 2015 at the Public Limited Company of Radioactive Waste Management (PURAM) and was entirely based on both domestic and international [1-5] guidance. Although the entire self-assessment was initiated, laid out and conducted by myself, beside that “behind the scene” obviously there were a lot of cooperation and communication. To determine the optimal method together with the management, that is responsible for the nuclear security and safety divisions. We agreed in order to the higher out fill ratio on a “traditional” paper based survey.

The applied techniques and innovations:

The presented method is appropriate to combine different guidance and characteristics, to measure safety and security attitudes with a singlesurvey. The first Hungarian combined self-assessment that wasoriginally applied by three different INSAG-15, GS-G-3.5 andNST 026 guidance. Between two characteristics the morevisible the lines are, thestronger the connections. As it can be seen on the table,every action, opinion and attitudehas an effect on the characteristics bythe different guides. About 3-5 indicatorof every characteristic was compared from all the Guidance. The point of the chart isno other to demonstrate the huge number ofconnections between safety and security culturecharacteristics. Although GS-G-3.5 created newcharacteristics, but every action and opinion are fitinto both guidance, just have to be categorised different, which explains the large number of connections.

Independent questions, which were related to both, nuclear safety and security culture indicators and was a combination of them. The given answer about the questiondetermines the result of both, one or more safety and securityculture characteristic.

Dependent questions. These can be related to only one, either a safety or a security culture characteristic. (Information security)

A significant connectionshows whether and how strongly answers andpairs of variables are related.

I made clusters and examine the connections between answers and all of their attributes. If the connection was significant and the average of the answer waslow or extremely high, than further analysis or assessment is required. To point to a strong and weak characteristic, the strength and weaknesses of the organisation. This kind of correlation analysis is capable to show the trends of these strength and weaknesses inside the organisation.

The relations of thecharacteristics of different guidance

Attributes/Characteristics Age Position Timeat

theorg.Safetyisaclearlyrecognizedvalue

Weaker Stronger Nocorrelation

Leadershipforsafetyisclear

Weaker Stronger Nocorrelation

Accountabilityforsafetyisclear

Weaker Stronger Nocorrelation

Safetyisintegratedintoallactivities

Weaker Stronger Nocorrelation

Safetyislearningdriven

Weaker Stronger Nocorrelation

Correlation analysis Process of the self-assessment

1. IAEA International Safety Advisory Group 15: Key practical issues to strengthen safety culture, Vienna (2002), 2. IAEA: The Management System for Nuclear Installations, Safety guide, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-3.5, Vienna, (2009) http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1392_web.pdf3. IAEA: NSS 07 Implementing Guide, Nuclear security culture, Vienna, 2008 http://ww w-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1347_web.pdf4. IAEA: NST 026 Technical Guidance, Self-assessment of nuclear security culture in facilities and activities - DRAFT, Vienna, (2014) http://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/ security/security-series-drafts/tech-guidance/nst026.pdf5. IAEA: NST 027 Technical Guidance NOT AN OFFICIAL DRAFT, Enhancing nuclear security culture in organisation associated with nuclear and/or radioactive material, Vienna, November 2015 version

Security of Nuclear Material in Transport · IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 26-G Implementing Guide Security of Nuclear Material in Transport INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY

National Nuclear Security - Energy

Nuclear Terrorism Threats Nuclear Security Global Nuclear Governance Nuclear Security Summit; background, significance, achievements 2012 Nuclear Security

Self-assessment of Nuclear Security Culture in …IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 28-T Technical Guidance Self-a ssessment of Nuclear Security Culture in Facilities and IAEA Nuclear

Nuclear Physics and National Security in an Age of Terrorismggilfoyl/research/fmS09.pdfInitial damage from blast; far fewer casualties than a nuclear bomb. Panic may be a major problem

Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical …...Recommendations IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 13 Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and

Nuclear Power Plant Security

IAEA Programme on Nuclear Security: Activities, Goals and ...€¦ · IAEA Nuclear Security Activities All IAEA nuclear security activities are implemented in accordance with the

Nuclear Security

Nuclear Safety and Nuclear Security Networking: Current and future

Computer Security Incident Response Planning at Nuclear ... · IAEA NUCLEAR SECURITY SERIES AND RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA guidance on nuclear security issues relating to the prevention

Legal Elements For Nuclear Security: Egyptian Nuclear Law

IAEA Nuclear Security Programme

Nuclear Security Education and Training At Naif Arab ... · International Symposium on Nuclear Security, Vienna, 30 March –3 April, 2009 Nuclear Security Education and Training

Nuclear Security Recommendations on Radioactive Material ... · IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 14 Nuclear Security Recommendations on Radioactive Material and Associated Facilities

Security Security of Nuclear Substances: Sealed Sources ... … · Security Plans for Category I, II, or III Nuclear Material, and G-274, Security Programs for Category I or II Nuclear

NATIONAL SECURITY & NUCLEAR DETERRENCE

Nuclear Security Summit 2010

Office of Nuclear Security Department of Nuclear Safety ... · Office of Nuclear Security Department of Nuclear Safety and Security. IAEA ... Types of incidents 1993-2007 1340 incidents

Nuclear Energy Pros and Cons. Pros: Low Pollution Nuclear power has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions than the burning of fossil fuels. Nuclear energy

Nuclear Security Recommendations on Radioactive …...Recommendations IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 14 Nuclear Security Recommendations on Radioactive Material and Associated Facilities

Nuclear Safety & Security Commission

Nuclear Security: Looking Ahead

Outcome of the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit and nuclear security culture

Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities · Technical Guidance Reference Manual IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 17 Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY

NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND SECURITY CONSORTIUM...nuclear engineering, radiation detection, radiochemistry and nuclear chemistry, and nuclear security policy supporting the nuclear security

Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC - Energy, Technology ... · Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC. ... Consolidated Nuclear Security ... • NNSA has a renewed focus on limiting so

Nuclear Security Fundamentals - IAEA Nuclear Security Series 20

National Nuclear Security Report (PER) · National Nuclear Security Administration Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Performance Evaluation ... radioisotope thermoelectric

Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: Nuclear Security, the Nonproliferation

ENHANCING NUCLEAR SECURITY CULTURE IN ORGANIZATIONS ... · 25 to nuclear security culture in organizations with responsibilities in relation to the security of 26 nuclear and other

Nuclear Security Summits / EU related activities · EU activities in the filed of Nuclear Security Highlights • Nuclear Detection • Nuclear Forensics • European Nuclear Security

Program Management at the National Nuclear Security ... · National Nuclear Security Administration Office of ... The scope of this paper is to review the National Nuclear Security

Russia's Nuclear Security Policy

Khammar MRABIT Director, Office of Nuclear Security Department of Nuclear Safety and Security