fetal stunting, fetal wasting and maternal nutritional...

20
- - i: . . FETAL STUNTING, FETAL WASTING AND MATERNAL NUTRITIONAL STATUS ANDRÉ ERIEND

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jun-2020

10 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

- -

i: . .

FETAL STUNTING, FETAL WASTING AND MATERNAL N U T R I T I O N A L STATUS

ANDRÉ E R I E N D

-* , <.. .. .

- 2 - '

SUMMARY

._' ! . i : '

To assess the n u t r t i o n a l s ta tus o f neh lorn i n fan ts by a methoc

roughly independent o f a p rec i se knw ledge o f gestat ional age, t h i s

. .. . . . .

. .-

paper suggests the use o f t\vo ind ices based on body measurements which

may r e f l e c t m a l n u t r i t i o n . On analogy w i t h o lde r ch i ld ren , the index

determining whether a newborn i n f a n t has a small body s ize compared t o

i t s head circumference was cal l e d the "s tun t ing index" whereas the one

measuring the r e l a t i v e weight f o r body length was c a l l e d the "wast ing

index", These ind ices were used t o determine the r e l a t i o n between

the n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus o f the newborn i n fan ts and t h e i r mothers i n an

underpr iv i leged popu la t ion i n Dakar which has a r e l a t i v e l y low mean

b i r t h weight o f between 3000 and. 32009, w i t h seasonal va r ia t i ons .

a sample o f 131 subjec&,- the morphology o f the newborn in fan ts was

found t o be l a r g e l y independent o f maternal mid upper arm circumference

In - -

suggesting t h a t the main l i m i t i n g fac to r o f f e t a l growth was no t

insu f f i c iency of maternal n u t r i t i o n a l reserves. To exp la in t h i s

observat ion and the w e l l documented r a p i d g r w t h of breast fed babies

i n Dakar, both facts d i f f i c u l t t o understand i f one assumes tha; f e t a l

m a l n u t r i t i o n a t the end o f pregnancy i s the consequence o f a poor

maternal n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus , an alterna; ve i n t e r p r e t a t i o n i s suggested :

imperfect adaptat ion o f the cardio-vascu a r system t o the up r igh t

posture a t the end o f pregnancy could be the main l i m i t i n g f a c t o r o f

f e t a l growth i n populat ions who do n o t have a gross ly d e f i c i e n t food

in take.

may be a consequence o f the i n t e n s i v e phys ica l a c t i v i t y o f the mothers

w i t h reduced o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r r e s t a t the end o f pregnancy. C l i n i c a l

imp l ica t rons a re discussed b r i e f l y : i t i s suggested t h a t i n m r e

Therefore, the s l i g h t f e t a l m a l n u t r i t i o n observed i n Dakar,

depr ived areas, where energy de f i c iency of maternal d i e t does l i m i t

. .

fetal growth, reduct ion of maternal a c t i v i t y should b e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h

energy suppiementation to o b t a i n opt¡ mal growth o f t h e fetus, .

Key words : pregnancy, fetus, growth, n u t r i t ion, p o s t u r e .

. . . .) . .

istic

o f i r

r a t e

soc¡ i

i n fc

from

s i m i

Morel

born

o f n

whos,

ma i n,

nutr

from

weig

of t

much

i n c

WOU 1

i nde

t h e

of t

. be r I

has

is 1

, , ._ .'.. . . . . . _ ~ . . .._... . . I ... . . 1 ...__. .... . . ._ . . . , __.. , . . I _.i , ,-- -.--,-. ... . - . II_̂ -".

- 4 -

I n the human spccies, the f e t a l ..growth curve has a very character-

A f t e r being almost l i n e a r from the 28th t o the 38th week i s t i c shape.

o f i n t r a u t e r i n e l i f e , there i s a progressive' reduct ion i q the growth;: .

r a t e which is more marked and occurs e a r l i e r i n the underpr iv i leged

s o c i a l classes (Gruenr.lald, 1966). I t seems u n l i k e l y tha t t h i s dec l i ne

i n f e t a l growth r a t e is of genet ic o r i g i n . Shor t l y a f t e r b i r t h , away

from the maternal environment, newborn i n f a n t s regain a growth r a t e

s i m i l a r t o the beginning of the t h i r d t r imes te r o f i n t r a u t e r i n e l i f e ,

Moreover, there i s no i r r e g u l a r i t y i n the growth curves o f prematurely

born babies near the¡ r theo re t i ca l term (Campbel 1 , 1976).

Gruenwald (1966) has suggested t h a t t h i s growth f a l t e r i n g may be

of n u t r i t i o n a l o r i g i n . According t o h i s observat ions, newborn babies

whose weight i s lower than i t would have been had t h e i r growth r%-

mained constant, have anatomical c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s reminescent o f m a l - - -

n u t r i t i o n i n o l d e r ch i ldren. Therefore, i t i s f requent ly concluded

frm h i s work and s i m i l a r s tud ies by Naeye (1965) t h a t a low b i r t h

weight f o r ges ta t i ona l age i s synonymous w i t h i n t r a u t e r i n e malnu t r i t i o n .

_. - - B i r t h weight by i t s e l f however must be considered a bad i n d i c a t o r

of the n u t r i t i o n a l status o f a newborn, F i r s t o f a l l , i t i s very

much in f luenced by the gestat ional age which i n p r a c t i c e i s f requen t l y

i n doubt.

wouid r e s u l t from the i n t e r a c t i o n o f two fac to rs which can vary

independently and which should n o t have the same s ign i f i cance : f i r s t

growth r a t e o f the fe tus and second the ex ten t and t im ing

Moreover, according t o Gruenwald - (1966) the b i r t h weight

the i n i t i a

of the dec

be re la ted

¡ne i n the growth curve.

t o i n t r a u t e r i n e n u t r i t i o n . Consequently, i f a newborn

Only t h i s second fac to r would

has a lcw b i r t h weight, one should speak o f ma l tau t r i t ion on ly i f there

is reason t o b e l i e v e tha t the low weight r e s u l t s from a pronounced

gmwth f a l t e r i n g . .

.. ._ I

- 5 ;

.- - I

- W i t h t h i s i n mind, i n t h e w o r k on n u t r i t i o n a l r e l a t i o n s between t h e

m o t h e r a n d the nev!born i n Dakar , we- t o o k i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n n o t t h e

b i r t h ' w e i g h C by i t s e l f , b u t d i f f e r e n t c o m b i n a t i o n s of i t w i t h h e a d c i r -

c u m f e r e n c c and body l e n g t h . T h i s r e p r e s e n t s an a t t e m p t t o a s s e s s t h e

n u t r i t i o n a r s t a t u s o f t h e newborn i n f a n t n o t by t h e a b s o l u t e v a l u e of

i t s a n t h r a p m t r i c p a r a m e t e r s b u t by c a l c u l a t e d i n d i c e s d e s c r i b i n g i t s

morpholog2. - .

We s p e c u l a t e d o n t h e a n a l o g y w i t h o l d e r c h i l d r e n ( J e 1 1 i f f e ,

1366) t h a t a o w b o r n i n f a n t w i t h a r e l a t i v e l y l a v w e i g h t and body l e n g t h

f o r h e a d - c \ r c u m f e r c n c e was l i k e l y t o h s v e h a d i n t r a u t e r i n e m a l n u t r i t i o n

r e g a r d l e s s of t h e a b s o l u t e v a l u e of t h e s e v a r i a , b l e s . C o n v e r s e l y , a

s m a l l b u t s o q r e c t l y p r o p o r t i o n e d n e w b o m i n f a n t . would b e c l a s s i f i e d as

n o r m a l l y m t d r ï s h e d and c o n s i d e r e d as h a v i n g a l o w i n i t i a l g rowth ra te

o r as haV¡qg a g e s t a t i o n a l a g e s l i g h t l y b e l o w t h e a v e r a g e of t h e g r o u p .

METHODS

T h e U;i?k was d o n e i n a m a t e r n i t y c e n t r e i n Dakar s e r v i n g womn of

a low s o c : o . e c o n o m i c leve- l . P r e v i o u s n u t r i t i o n a l s u r v e y s o f t h i s

p o p u l a t i o n r e p o r t e d a mean e n e r g y i n t a k e of s l i g h t l y o v e r 2000 k c a l . /

d a y (Cano=., a n d Chevassus-Agnes , 1 9 7 8 ) . A s a m p l e o f newborn i n f a n t s

was taker; i n J u n e 1 9 7 8 a t t h e e n d of t h e 2ry s e a s o n , a time of t h e y e a r

when tke S r t h w e i g h t i s s1 i g h t l y a b o v e a v e r a g e - ( D u p i n , Masse and

Correa, Z~S]. B a b i e s b o r n b e t w e e n 7 a.". a n d 1 p.m. on t h e d a y s of

t h e s t u % were s y s t e m a t i c a l l y e x a m i n e d . T h o s e w i t h a g e s t a t i o n a l a g e

e v a l u a t e & !& n e u r o l o g i c a l e x a m i n a t i o n ( S a i n t - A n n e D a r g a s s i e , 1974) as

b e i n g OYGL- 38 weeks a n d whose m o r h e r s h a d n o t had p r e - e ~ l a m p s i a as

d e f i n e d by the s imul t a n e o u s o c c u r r e n c e of h y p e r i e n s í o n , oedema and .. ' I . . .

p r o t e i n u r t a w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e s u r v e y . T h e t o t a l was 131 b a b i e s ,

, . . ,.-., .. :... .. .. .

d"

. I

- 6 -

. ~, -.. . ., I . . i.. , . .__. ~ . . . ' . . . -_ .. . i .. " . . - . . _ _ . ' . . _ . 2.. . _ . :

Il

- c &

1 the

c i r-

I

l eng th

.i t i o n 1

i a

.d as

J roup.

I I

. .

?n o f

3

31 ./

fants

2 year

s o f

1 age

1 as

S

d

es.,

1

of wolo f , Peulhe, Toucouleur o r Sere o i i g in . The 'average p a r i t y I

of the mothers was 3,s (s.d. = 2 , l ) ; there were 22 primiparae.

' , . .- The accuracy o f the masQrements ;.ras t l o g f o r U i r t h weight, f 1mm

f o r [lead circumference and ? 0,s cm f o r body length, Subjects w i t h

cephalhaematoma were excluded,

ference o f every m t h e r was a l s o masured (accuracy = k ~ m n ) .

The he igh t and mid upper a r m circÜm-

RESULTS

t h e i r mothers are shown i n Table 1 and 2. There i s

t i o n between the infan; meas&ements-as shown i n Tab

The mean values o f the measurements o f the newborn in fants and

a s t rong co r re la -

e 3, whi ch means

t h a t these var iab les each g ive very s i m i l a r informat on. To ob ta in

- independent ind ices descr ib ing morphological cha rac te r i s t i cs o f every

subject and p rov id ing a maximum of i n fo rmat ion , we made a p r i n c i p a l

component analysis.

anthropometr ic data by a r o t a t i o n o f t he a x i s i n three independent

I n o ther words, we transformed the standardized

-

ind ices Z1 ,:Z2, Z3-which are s u f f i c i e n t t o charac ter ize a newborn

i n fan t .

i

The formula f o r the t rans format ion o f the standardized data can

be deduced from t h e coordinates of the e igenvectors o f the c o r r e l a t i o n

matr ix . We obta ined :

Z1 = 0 , 6 1 Weight + O,59 Body Length f 0,53 Head Circumference

22 = -0,25 Weight -0,49 Body Length + 0,84 Head Ci

Z3 = -0,76 Weight + 0,63 Body Length + 0,16 H-ead C

These ind ices exp la in respec t ive ly 76%, 17% and 7% of

cumference

iance, T h e i r mean value f o r the whole sample is zero.

rcumfe ren ce

the g lobal var-

.- e

t - To i l l u s t r a t e t h e s e formulae,we w i l l use them to c a l c u l a t e the in-

d ices of a newborn i r . f a r , t ~ J ! \ O S ~ b i r t h f ; . e igh t i s 3226 q, body l e n g t h is

43.4 cm a n d head c i r c u n f e r c n c e is 3 3 , & ai. These d a t a r e p r e s e n t t h e

a v e r a g e v a l u e s of newborn i n f a n t s i n Denver ( C o l o r a d o , U.S.A.) a t 40 --

weeks o f g e s t a t i o n a l a g e a c c o r d i n 0 to :he pro::th c h a r t o f Lubchenco

(1963; 1966) . T r a n s l a t e d i n t o s i l s n d s r d l zed da:a, t h e s e p a r a m e t e r s

Head ci r c c n f c r c n c c = - 1 , I I -

21 = -0,67~0,04 - o,52xo,33 - 0.53~1 , I I = -o,81 . _ -

likewise :

22 = -0,77,z3 = - 0 3 .

T h e s e t h r e e va l r tes ãre ouzside t h e i n t e r v a l o f v a r i a t i o n o f t h e a v e r a g e

of t h e s e i n d i c e s i n our s a n ~ l e (p F 0 , O l ) . T h i s p i n t w i l l b e d i s c u s s e d

1 a t e r .

li

1

After c a l c u l a t i n g i n d i c e s 2 1 , 22 and 23 f o r e v e r y newborn i n f a n t ,

we examZned t h e i r r e l a t i o n to r a t e r n a 1 h e i g h t and mid upper arm circux-

ference. The c o r r e l a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s . a r e g i v e n i n Ï a b l e 4 . Br ie f

Z1 i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y and p o s i t i v e l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h - m a t e r n a i h e i g h t

(D < 0,05), 22 is G e 9 sionificanriy n e g a t i v e l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e

same p a r a m z t e r (p < O . O J ) , Z3 is v e r y s i g n i f i c a n t l y n e g a t i v e l y corr-

e l a t e d w i z h m a r e r n a l arm c i r c u n f e r e n c e (p < 0,Ol).

/

f . :..

6

I , :.

40

CO

rs

we r a g e

ji s c u s s e

n f a n t ,

ci rcum-

r i e f l y ,

h t

t h e

o r r -

i i

. .

- a - .

. - - 1

DISCUSS I ON

1. Interpretation ‘of t h ; indices

Index Z 1 is p o s i t i v e l y c o r r e l a t e d y¡ t h t h e t h r e e a n t h r o p o m e t r i c

p a r a m e t e r s of t h e newborn i n f a n t s .

b o t h to t h e g e s t a t i o n a l a g e and to t h e - g r m t h p o t c n t i a l of e v e r y sub-

j e c t , t h i s i n d e x may b e c o n s i d e r e d as r e s u l t i n g from b o t h v a r i a b l e s ,

As e a c h o n e i s c l o s e l y r e l a t e d

t n d i c e s 22 and 23 a r e a m e a s u r e o f t h e e x t e n t to which t h e n e w b o r n

morphology r e s e m b l e s t h a t of o l d e r c h i l d r e n who h a v e had some d e g r e e

of m a l n u t r i t i o n . 22 i s h i g h . f o r b a b i e s w i t h a low b i r t h w e i g h t and

a s m a l l body l e n g t h fo r t h e i r h e a d c i r c u m f e r e n c e , Z3 i s h i g h f o r

t h o s e who h a v e a low w e i g h t fo r b o d y l e n g t h ,

ch’ i ldren , ( J e l l i f f e , 1966) \ . rewi 1 1 d e s i g n a t e 22 t h e “ s t u n t i n g index”

and Z3 t h e “ w a s t i n g index“ .

On a n a l o g y w i t h o l d e r . .- - -

Because of t h e way t h e y a r e c a l c u l a t e d , 22 and Z3 v a r y i n d e p e n d -

So, i f o n e follows t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of Z l s u g g e s t e d , e n t l y of 21.

t h e a s s e s s m e n t o f n u t r i t i o n a l s t a t u s of t h e newborn i n f a n t s o b t a i n e d

by e v a l u a t i o n of t h e s e i n d i c e s i s n o t i n f l u e n c e d by t h e i n a c c u r a c y o f

g e s t a t i o n a i a g e o r by t h e v a r i a t i o n s o f g r a v t h p o t e n t i a l .

e x t e n t , 22 and Z3 may b e c o n s i d e r e d a s ; ” p r e c i s e a g e i n d e p e n d e n t

To some

i n d i c e s ” of n u t r i t i o n a l s t a t u s .

2. Validity of the mathematka2 mode2

T h e m a t h e m a t i c a l model w e u s e d to assess t h e n u t r i t i o n a l s t a t u s

o f t h e newborn i n f a n t s assumes t h a t t h e r e l a t i o n be tween t h e dimen-

s i o n s of t h e h e a d a n d t h e body i s m a i n l y i n f l u e n c e d by n u t r i t i o n a l

factors. T h i s i s n o t t o t a l l y t r u e . F i r s t , some i n d i v i d u a l v a r i a -

t i o n s of t h e morphology may b e of g e n e t i c o r i g i n and t h i s can b i a s

the resu l ts . Moreover, the volume of the head o f a newborn i n fan t i s

p r o p o r t i o n a l l y g rea ter when the ges ta t i ona l age i s l o w (Vaughan and

MacKay, 1975).

a r e l a t i v e l y homogenous sample o f newborn i n f a n t s f o r gestat ional age

To avoid d i s t o r t i o n from t h i s second factor,we se lec ted

by t e s t i n g t h e i r m a t u r i t y neuro log ica l l y .

Though t h i s method o f assessment of n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus i s f a r from

per fec t , i t should be more accurate than the usual one o f comparing

the b i r t h weight o f a newborn i n f a n t wi th the average fo r i t s ges ta t iona l

age which i s based on the double assumption t h a t a l l the subjects have

the same i n i t i a l growth ra te and tha t t h e i r ges ta t i ona l age is known

p rec i se l y . These hypotheses can never be v e r i f i e d i n pract ice.

Whatever method i s used, i t seems ind ispensable t o r e l y on a model

based on the simultaneous ana lys is o f severa l anthropomet-ric - - var iab les.

Mathematical ly, i t is impossible t o e x t r a c t from the va r ia t i ons o f the

b i r t h weight alone the r e l a t i v e importance o f i n t r a u t e r i n e n u t r i t i o n

and o the r fac to rs t o determine s i z e a t b i r th. It i s necessary t o

consider a t l e a s t one other v a r i a b l e submi t ted t o the same in f luences -. - -

bu t reac t i ng d i f f e r e n t l y .

3 . Comparison of the Dakar newborn infmrts w i t h t h e Denver s t a n d a d

Previous lywe ca l cu la ted the i n d i ces-of the mean values o f t he

anthropometr ic parameters o f 4 0 week Denver newborn in fan ts . As the

mean b i r t h weight o f our sample is .32419 which i s s l i g h t l y above the

Denver standard, one might assume tha t the n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus o f Dakar

newborn i n fan ts i s very s i m i l a r t o the Denver one.

o f n u t r i t i o n a l ind ices con t rad i c t s t h i s f i r s t impression.

The c a l c u l a t i o n

> 1

The "s tun t ing '1 and "wasting" i nd i ces 22 and Z 3 which are supposed

t o be c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f i n t r a - u t e r i n e ma lnu t r i t i o n obtained by the

...

I ' .

t is" 4 I i d

3 : lec ted II

< !

age I

i !

l 1

4 r from j

ag

t a t i on a l

have I

I

i

I 3

! 3 i 1

own

,/

1 3 model

iables. 1 2f the

i t i o n 1

I

1 t o

ences

gdards ~

:he

Is the

3 the

f Dakar

t i o n

uppos ed

the '

. .

. .-

- l o -

I '

transformation of the Denver data are c l e a r l y below ze'ro which i s by

d e f i n i t i o n the mean value o f o u r sample. T h i s suggests tha t the fac to rs

1 i m i t i n g the fe

occur sooner i n

The f i r s t

a.1 'grJordth a t fhe ,cn¿'of i n t r a u t e r i n e 1 ¡,fe. are greater o r

Dakar than i n Denver.

ndex 21 i s a l so h igher i n Dakar, T h i s can be exp la ined

i n two d i f f e r e n t ways : one might argue t h a t the growth p o t e n t i a l i s

h igher inoursample o r t h a t the mean ges ta t i ona l age of the newborn in-

fants examined i s s l i g h t l y more than 4 0 weeks. These two p o s s i b i l -

i t i e s a r e not mutual ly exc lus ive. Unfor tunate ly , the data g ive no

i nd i ca t i on o f the cor rec t i n t e rp r e t a t ion.

Maybe e t h n i c fac to rs i n f l uence the growth p o t e n t i a l dur ing f e t a l

l i f e .

heavier than wh i te ones up t o 28 or 30 weeks .of ges ta t iona l age a l though

It was repor ted from New York t h a t b lack newborn i n fan ts were

- -

t h e i r subsequent b i r t h weight was s l i g h t l y lower (Erhardt e t aZ, 1964).

The p o s s i b i l i t y o f a mean g e s t a t i o n a l age of s l i g h t l y more than 40

weeks i n my sample o f i n fan ts must a l s o be considered. Geber and

Dean (

degree

be exp

1974).

957) repor ted tha t the A f r i can newborn i n f a n t has an advanced

o f neuro log ica l maturat ion by European standards. This migh t

I n

tha t c l ¡mat

durat ion of

the Rhesus

ained by a prolonged pe r iod o f ges ta t i on (Saint Anne Dargassie,

Monkey, R i o p e l l e and Hale (1975) have shown

c and nu t r t i o n a l f a c t o r s have sane in f luence on the

pregnancy. - These two p o s s i b i l i t i e s o f a d i f f e r e n t groclcth p o t e n t i a l i n o u r

populat ion or of a d i f f e r e n t g e s t a t i o n length suggest t h a t !he assess-

ment o f n u t r i t i o n a l

alone may be b iased

urgent need t o deve

knowledge o f ges ta t

status o f a newborn i n f a n t by i t s b i r t h weight

by unexpected fac to rs .

op improved ind ices , independent o f p r e c i s e

This under l ines the

onal age for i n v e s t i g a t i o n . of f e t a l n u t r i t i o n .in

develop i ng count r ¡es.

- 1 1 -'

4. Relation beta)ecn materna2 anthmpometry -- - wid indices of the i n f m t s h

The observed pos¡ t i v e c o r r e l a t i o n between 21 and maternal he igh t n

mans t h a t arger mothers tend t o have la rge babies a t b i r t h . T h i s .

i s a genera

and Le i t ch , 1971) . The r e l a t i o n s o f 22 and Z 3 w i t h maternal anthropo-

metry provides more o r i g i n a l in format ion about the in f luence o f maternal

n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus on f e t a l growth. we t r i e d t o use these ind ices t o

determine whether, i n oursample, the i n f a n t s whose morphology was

suggest ive o f m a l n u t r i t i o n were born t o th inne r women as m i g h t be ex-

pected i f the poor n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus of the mothers was the main

l i m i t i n g f a c t o r o f f e t a l growth.

r u l e which app l ies even between d i f f e r e n t species (Hytten

The index o f wast ing (Z3 ) was s i g n i f i c a n t l y negat ive ly c o r r e l a t e d

w i t h maternal mid upper arm circumference.

o f the women examined had i n s u f f i c i e n t n u t r i t i o n a l reserves t o

T h i s suggests t h a t s o r e

support f e t a l growth up t o the end o f pregnancy. This phenomenon

however must be considered as r e l a t i v e l y minor : Z3 expla ins on ly a

smal l p a r t o f the g loba l var iance (7%) which means t h a t i t had l i t t l e

i n f l uence on the morphology of the i n fan ts ;

(22) accounted f o r much m r e o f the morphological v a r i a t i o n i n t h e

The index o f s t u n t i n g

sample (77% of the g lobal var iance),

w i t h maternal mid upper arm circumference.

o f f e t a l dep r i va t i on assessed by the r e l a t i v e p;oportions o f the head

and the body was l a r g e l y independent of t h i s i n d i c a t o r o f maternal

n u t r i t i o n a l s ta tus .

w ide l y h e l d b e l i e f t h a t poor maternal n u t r i t i o n a l reserves are the

p r i n c i p a l , l i m i t i n g fac to r o f f e t a l growth i n developing countr ies.

The i n t e r v e n t i o n of o t h e r f a c t o r s independent o f maternal n u t r i t i o n a l

s ta tus , suggested by the resu l t s , could exp la in why breas t fed babies

However, i t was no t c o r r e l a t e d

I n o ther words, the degree

This f i n d i n g i s s u r p r i s i n g i n the l i g h t o f t he

I * . ..

,d 1%

n fa? t s

i g h t

'h is

i y t ten

rh ropo-

na t e rna 1

2s t o

* :

5

e ex-

n

e l a t e d

S O I X

) 1 1

i Y a i

on I

i t t l e

l i n g

:he

3 1 a ted

2 degree

3 head

na1

f the

the

es.

t i o n a l

ab I es

1

. .

. .

* . - - 1 2 - ; -

have very rap id growth a f t e r b i r t h i n Dakar despi te a r e l a t i v e l y low

" mean b i r th weight (Masse, 196:). ' , . .'

4 I

To expla in these facts, impossible to understand on a pu re l y

n u t r i t i o n a l bas is , we suggesc a n o n - n u t r i t i o n a l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f -_

var ia t ions o f

theory o f evo

observed j u s t

ion; there i s

f e t a l growth in d i f f e r e n t s o c i a l groups drawn from the

u f i o n (Briend, i n p repara t ion) . The growth f a 1 t e r i n g

before b i r t h i n man must be considered as an imper fect -

no reason - t o be l i eve tha t dep r i va t i on o f the fetus j u s t

before the s t ress o f de l i ve ry would be o f any value t o the species.

Very l i k e l y , t h i s - imper fect ion appeared a t the same t ime as the

acqu is i t i on o f the u p r i g h t p o s i t i o n which was associated w i t h a

r e l a t i v e d iminu t ion o f the dimensions o f the p e l v i s and o f the t runk

and the appearance o f lumSer lo rdos is .

predispose t o compression by the pregnant u terus o f the ao r ta and

These s k e l e t a l mod i f i ca t ions

for f e t a l

This

i mpe r f e c t

. . I '

i n f e r i o r vena cava. The r e s u l t i n g haemdynamic changes have un-

favourable imp l i ca t i ons for the p lacen ta l b lood f l ow and hence f o r

f e t a I n u t r i t i o n and are aggravated by the s tanding p o s i t i o n . The

negat ive c o r r e l a t i o n we observed between 22 ( s tun t i ng ) and mate rna l

he ight may be a consequence of the reduc t ion o f the space a v a i l a b l e

development.

hypothesis impl ies t h a t pregngnt women must be considered as

y adapted t o the up r igh t p o s i t i o n and t h a t t h e i r way of l i f e

a t the end o f pregnancy may in f l uence f e t a l n u t r i t i o n .

exp la in why the dec l i ne o f f e t a l growth a t the end of i n t r a u t e r i n e

l i f e tha t e x i s t s i n i ndus t ra l i zed count r ies seems p a r t i c u l a r l y

Pronounced i n o u r sample : i n Dakar, wmen o f low socio-economic l e v e l

are very a c t i v e p h y s i c a l l y and remain on t h e i r f e e t up t o t h e end of

pregnancy wi th 1 i t t l e poss ib i 1 ¡ t y of rest .

Th is cou ld

. . . . , .., . _ _ ._-;*- . -. . I... .. :-" , . . . . . - .. . ,' . . . '._ ,.., . L :. :... . , . , > _.,. i' :.. ____. ., . . . ' ..: Z'. . .: . .. . *.....,t. . , . - . .

- 1 3 - '

CONCLUS I ON

I n Dakar, the mean b i r t h w i g h t , between 3OOOg and 32009 w i t h

seasonal var ia t ions (Dupin, Masse and Correa, 7962) i s low compared t o

European standards. .. .

I t is s i m i l a r t o tha t observed i n groups o f l w

socio-economic leve l i n developed count r ies (Gruenwald, 1966). I n our

sample o f f u l l term nenborn infants,we observed t h a t thd i r morphology,

assessed by the r e l a t i v e dimensions o f the head and the body, was

reminescent o f ma lnu t r i t i on i n o l d e r c h i l d r e n , which suggested t h a t

they may have undergone s l i g h t n u t r i t i o n a l dep r i va t i on i n l a t e f e t a l

1 i fe. -

I t seems d i f f i c u l t t o exp la in these two fac ts on a pure ly nu t -

r i t i o n a l basis and t o r e l a t e them t o an i n s u f f i c i e n c y of the maternal - . - -

d i e t . F i r s t , inoursample, the morphology o f the i n f a n t s was l a r g e l y

indpendent.of the mid upper arm circumference o f t he mothers when the

reserse should have been observed i f a poor maternal n u t r i t i o n a l

s ta tus had been the main l i m i t i n g f a c t o r o f f e t a l growth. On the o t h e r

hand, i t i s we l l documented t h a t i n Dakar, breast f e d babies have r a p i d

g r w t h , a t leas t dur ing the f i r s t months o f l i f e and catch up very

qu i c k l y t o in te rna t iona l standards (Masse, 1969). An a l t e r n a t i ve

exp lanat ion must be considered andwe suggest t h a t impairment o f f e t a l

growth i n Dakar, may be the consequence o f the e f f e c t o f excessive

maternal a c t i v i t y on p lacenta l b lood f low.

-

T h i s conclusion leads us t o r a i s e some quest ions. There i s good

evidence that , i n contrast t o Dakar, energy de f ic iency o f the maternal

d i e t i s the main l i m i t i n g fac to r of f e t a l growth i n many depr ived areas

o f developing countr ies, (Lecht ig e t aZ, 1p75).'

whether supplementation of the maternal d i e t alone i s r e a l l y ab le t o

I r .. However, we ques t ion

5

hat

e t a1

u t -

e rna

arge

' I

L. 3h

.h

-ed to

f l0rJ _ .

I n our

3 b Y ,

I

ie o t h e r 1

t Y ]

n t h e

i /e rapid

2 ry

i ve

f e t a l

i ve

i s good

a t e rna l

ed a reas

ues t i on

le to

- 14 - - - ' -

i overcom th i s t y p e o f f e t a l malnut r i t ion .

ignores the h u g e work load t h a t f a l l s on mothers i n developing count-

ries' and which,we, be l i eve , even i n urban areas s.uch as Dakar, may.

i t s e l f a f f e c t f e t a l growth.

the energy expendi ture of t h e women by reducing t h e i r more s t renuous

work?

placental blood flow, amplify the e f f e c t o f any d i e t a ry supplement

on energy balance, and improve t h e s tandard o f ch i ld care during t h e

Such an approach t o t a l l y

. .. . . : * ' '

Would i t not a l so be advisable t o reduce

This,we be l i eve , would suppress unfavourable e f f e c t s on

f i r s t months o f l i fe . T h u s reduct ion o f maternal a c t i v i t y should b e

associated w i t h energy supplementation of t h e maternal d i e t t o o b t a i n

optimal f e t a l growth i n developing count r ies . -

. _ -

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by 0.R.S.TfO.M. (Off ice d e Recherche

Sc ien t i f ique e t Technique Outre Mer) and 0.R.A.N.A. (Organisme d e

Recherche s u r 1I.Alimentation e t la Nu t r i t i on Afr icaine) i n Dakar, c c

Senegal.

(M.R.C. Dunn Nu t r i t i on U n i t , Cambridge) for h e l p and advice i n the

I w i s h a l s o to express my g r a t i t u d e t o Dr. M.G.M. Rowland

preparat ion of t h i s manuscript.

- 1 5 - -

RE FE RENCES

B r i e n d A.: F e t a l m a l n u t r i t i o n - t h e p r i c e of u p r i g h t p o s t u r e . In

p r e p r a t i o n (1979). _.-

Campbel l S.: Fetal growth . In: F e t a l p h y s i o l o g y a n d m e d i c i n e , e d .

R . W . B e a r d and P.U. N a t h a n i e l s z , p . 2 7 1 - 3 n I . W . B . S a u n d e r s Company

L t d , London (197G:..

c

Canonne P., Chevassus-Agnes S. : E n q e t e d e consommsr ion a l i m e n t a i re

F.A.O./O.R.A.M.A., Dakar ( 1 9 7 8 ) .

Dupin ti., r iasse L-, Correa f . : C o n t r i b u t i o n a

n a i s s a n c e >

. I'Gtuãe d e s p o i d s d e

la r a c e r n i t é z f ri cai n e de Daka:-; évolerion an cours d?S

a n n e e s , v a r i a t i o n s s a i s o n n i e r e s . - -

- -(1962).

E r h a r d t C.L., Doshi C.E., Ide lson

f l u e n c e of weights and g e s t a t i o n

by e t h n i c g r o u p . Am. J. Put.. Hea

C o u r r i e t Gu C.I.E. 12, 4 , 1-30 - ~ ..

F.G., K r o l l B.H., W e i n e r

o n p e r i n a t a l a n d n e o n a t a

L.: In-

m o r t a l ¡ t y

G e b e r P.-, Deara R.F .A. : The s t a t e ' o f d e v e l o p m c n r of newborn A f r i c a n

c h i l d r e n . ' L a n c e t , - i , 1216-9 ( 1 9 5 7 ) .

Gruenwald I . : Growth of t h e human f e t u s : I. Norms1 g r a q t h a n d ¡Cs

v a r i a t i o n s . Am. J. O b s t e t . Gyriec. 54, 712-119 (1966).

Hy t t en ' F.E., t e i t c h I . : T h e p h y s i o l o g y of huma6 p r e g n a n c y . 2nd e d .

-

B 1 ackwel 1 S c i e n t i f i c P u b 1 i c a t i o n s , London ( 1 971 *

J e l l i f f e D . B . : The a s s e s s m n t of t h e n u t r i t i o n a l s t a t u s of t h e

c o r m u n i t y - WHO m n c s r a p h , Geneve.

L e c h t i g A., h a b i c h t J.P.', D e l s a d o M.; ' K l e i n . R.E.; Yarbrough C. :

E f f e c t of food s u p p l e m e n t a t i o n d u r i n g p r e g n a n c y o n b i r t h w e i g h t .

(1966)-

I

P e d i a t r i c s , - 56, 508-20 ( 1 3 7 5 ) .

In *

d.

any

ta¡ re

s d e

lrs des

3 0

In-

- t a l i t y

r i can

n d i ï

id e d .

c . :

g h t .

... . .

- 16 - -

1

Lubchenco L.O., Hansman c . , Dressle; M . , Boyd E.: In t rau ter ine growth

as estimated from liveborn b i r t h w e i g h t data a t 24-42 weeks o f qest- . . , . -

! '

a t ion . Pcdfa t r ics ; - 3 2 , 793-800 (Iq63). i :

Lubchenco L.O., Hansman C . , Boyd E . : In t rau ter ine growth i n l e n g t h

l i v e b i r t h a t ges ta t iona l --

403-8 (1 966)~.

and head circumference as es t imated from

ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Ped¡ a t r i c s , 37

Masse G.: Croissance e t developpemnt de

(1 969

-

a t ion .

Riopel

a f f e c t

1170-6

- - -

1 Internat ional d e 1 Enfrance- P a r i s

Naeye R . L . : Malnutr i t ion, a probab

Arch. Pathol. -i 79, 284-91 (

l 'enfant Dakar. Centre

e cause of f e t a l growth re ta rd-

3 6 5 ) . - -

e A . J . , Hale P .A. : N u t r i t i o n a l and environmental fac tors

ng ges ta t ion l e n g t h i n rhesus monkey. Am. J. C l in . Nutr. 28, - (1975)

Saint-Anne Dargassie S. : Le développement neurologique d u nouveau ne'

à terme e t prematurg. Masson e t Cic P a r i s , (1974).

Vaughan V . C . , MacKay R.J.:Nelsons Textbook of Pedia t r ics . 1 0 t h ed.

W. B. Saunders Company, P h i ladelphi a (1975) -

i

. u

n

Table 1

5 . .

I ' t ' * .

NTHROPOMETRI C PARAIiETERS OF THE NEWBORN INFANTS

Weight (9) Body l e n g t h Head C i r c u m f e i e n c e ( c d ("1

324 1 50 35 1 me an

s.d. 392 11

. .

_-

e

Table 2

ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS OF T H E MOTHERS

Me an

Height (un)

162

A r m ci rcumference (mn)

- 26 1

- S.d. - - fi 33

Table 3 i:

C O R E L A T lot1 HATRI X OF THE Aì4fMWO$QMETRI C PARAIIETERS

OF THE NEWBORN I~EFANTS

B i r t h Body Head \le i gh t Length c i rcumference -

B i r t h we¡ g h t 1 n 9 790 0 , W

Body leng th - ..

0,790

Head circumference 0,606

1

0,579

0,513

1

I

- . . - i

.. . .: '

CORRELATION MATRIX OF INDlCES Zl, Z2 and Z3 VlTH

MATERNAL ANTHROPOMETRIC P a R A H E T E R S

z1 22 ( s t u n t i n g ) ~3 ( w a s t i n g )

He i g h t O, 176".

Arm c i rcumference O , 143 ns

- 0,2435

O,í14 ns

- 0,152 ns

ns : non s i g n i f i c a n t

2; : p less t h a n 0,OS J. ,.,. -1. : p less t h a n 0,Ol

. . _.. . ^ . ' . , . ... ., :. ..: .

- . , ' . , L I - . I.',..+. T-. . ,: . e,<: .

. . . ' .. I I . . ..i- ._ ., ,

. , . . I . .1.

... . I - .,~. . . ...,. .:::. . -, . . . . . . .