feeder separation project
DESCRIPTION
Mr. Mohammad Suleman Secretary (Energy), Govt. of Madhya Pradesh at RPR 2012, 23-26 August, Goa, IndiaTRANSCRIPT
Feeder Separation Project Mohammed Suleman Secretary Energy, GoMP
August 2012
Goal of Power Sector
To provide 24 Hours supply to every willing household in
the State by FY 13.
To ensure continuous 8 hours quality supply to
Agricultural consumers through separate feeders by FY 13.
Challenges
Accurate Demand projection
Availability to meet demand
Transmission Network Strengthening
Distribution System Strengthening
Commercial viability of operations
Commercial Scenario
AT&C losses
• Reduction in last 5 years – About 10%
• Current AT&C loss level – 31.62% (excluding transmission losses)
• Transmission losses – 3.51%
Share of Agriculture Consumption - 30%
Tariff Subsidy - Rs.1925 crore (FY 12)
Percentage recovery from Agriculture (net of Govt. subsidy) – 50%
RPU & ACoS Gap - Rs.1.03 per unit (FY 12)
Proposed Solution
Separation of 11kV feeders for domestic and
agricultural use in rural areas.
Objectives of FSP
“To provide commercially viable continuous
supply of electricity in rural habitations while
ensuring sufficient supply for agricultural use to
promote sustainable exploitation of ground
water, thereby to accelerate socio-economic
development of rural areas.”
Benefits of FSP
Better quality & reliability of power supply due to separate 11kV feeders and
System strengthening.
Reduction in AT&C losses:
• Prevention of theft / Direct hooking from LT network catering to non-agricultural
load;
• Reduction in technical losses; and
• Restricted supply hours to agricultural pumps.
Reduction in Equipment failure.
Water Conservation with restricted hours of required power supply to
agricultural pumps.
Round the clock power supply would encourage development of rural
industries.
Improvement in Livelihood Index due to accessibility of power for 24 hours in
rural areas.
No of Feeders require Separation
Name of Company Feeders to be
Separated
Feeders covered
RGGVY & Old
schemes
Feeders
covered under
Feeder
Separation
Scheme
No. No. No.
East 1891 246 1645
Central 1729 395 1334
West 2642 315 2327
State 6262 956 5306
Scope of Feeder Separation Project
Particulars Unit East Discom Central
Discom
West
Discom State
33 kV S/s No 0 169 65 234
11 kV new
line Kms 37138 17571 16979 71688
DTR No 28504 32553 24640 85697
HVDS Kms 0 6438 5916 12354
Conversion
to AB Cable Kms 21487 15000 20503 56990
Meter No 587701 751269 596285 1935255
No of
Feeders No 1645 1334 2327 5306
No of
Villages No 15860 15745 10837 42442
Project Cost of Feeder Separation
Name of the
Discom
1st Phase (REC) 2nd Phase(ADB)
Other Schemes (RGGVY & Old ADB) Total
Cost
Distt. (in
No.)
No. of feeders
Cost
Distt. (in
No.)
No. of feeders
Cost
No of Feeders
Cost
East 9 708 765.88 8 937 1012.32 280 119.37 1897.57
Central 7 516 427.13 9 818 717.88 376 510.80 1655.81
West 7 1209 528.26 7 1118 699.11 451 377.00 1604.37
State 23 2433 1721.27 24 2873 2429.31 1107 1007.17 5157.70
For the 1st Phase, Loan is sanctioned by REC Ltd.
For the 2nd Phase, Loan is sanctioned by ADB.
Cost (Rs in Cr)
Project Methodology
• District-wise turnkey contracts for construction
• No material supply by the Discoms
• Contractor to design the system and approval by Independent
Engineer
• Construction supervision by Independent Engineering firm
• Concurrent supervision by Discom officers
• Centralized Project Management at Corporate offices
• Contractor to ensure loss level below 12% post completion at DTR
level
Procurement Strategy (1/3)
Bid documents were prepared in advance
Contractor conferences were organized
• Delhi (04.08.2010,No of participants-35)
• Hyderabad (05.08.2010, No of participants-32)
• Mumbai (09.08.2010, No of participants-31)
Independent supervision- First time concept of PMC
introduced in the Discoms for better monitoring, quality
control & timely completion of the project.
• PMC for Phase-I: M/s Feedback Ventures Pvt. Ltd. for all 3
Discoms
• PMC for Phase-II: M/s UR Scott Wilson for West & East Discoms
M/s ICT Pvt. Ltd. for Central Discom
Procurement Strategy (2/3)
Transparent process:
• National level publicity by arranging conferences in metro/ Tier-I cities;
• Publication in national newspapers; and
• Publicity through website of the Discoms.
Competition: Bids received
Award:
Discom Max. Nos. Min. Nos. Average
East 27 4 13
Central 24 6 12
West 23 6 14
Discom No of Contracts Awarded
East 29
Central 19
West 26
Procurement Strategy (3/3)
Time taken in the process (Issue of NIT to LoA)
Some Names of contractors
• West Discom- M/s. Hythro Power Ltd. Gurgaon, M/s Aster Tele
Services Hyderabad, M/s Vindhya Telelinks Ltd. New Delhi, M/s
UbiTech Ltd. Faridabad, M/s NCC Ltd, M/s Vishwa Infrastructures
Services P. Ltd. M/s Megha Engg & Infra Ltd.–KEPCO(JV), M/s
Vishwanath Project Ltd., etc.
• East Discom- Aster, Godrej, KMG, Era, ARK, Ramky, Kepco Korea,
A2Z, Eltel, GET Power, New Modern, UB Engg.
• Central Discom- M/s KEI, Godrej, GET,NCC,Jyoti structure, Shyam
Indus, AMRCL.
Discom Phase-I Phase-II
East 3 months 6 months
Central 4.5 months 5 months
West 4 months 5.5 months
PROGRESS OF FEEDER SEPARATION WORK UP
TO JULY 2012
Discom Total no. of feeder to be separated in all scheme
Cumulative progress of feeder separated up to 31st July 2012
% achievement
No. of feeders
Total villages
East 1891 617 4227 33%
Central 1729 578 3848 33%
West 2642 874 2665 33%
Total 6262 2069 10740 33%
Final Results (Expected)
Particulars Existing After Feeder
Separation
Increase
No %
33kV S/s 2638 2872 234 9%
Length of 11kV
Lines in Km 216488 288176 71688 33%
Cable (Kms) 9560 69677 60117 629%
No of DTRs 302502 388199 85697 28%
Meter 6084683 8109417 2024774 33%
No of rural
domestic
Consumers (in
lakhs)
40.22 50.45 10.23 25%
State
Sample Results
S. No.
Particulars AT&C Loss %
Before FSP
After FSP
1 11 KV Bhaitari feeder 39.90 29.50
2 11 KV Kusmi feeder 49.47 31.45
3 11KV Surkhi feeder 64.55 4.71
4 11KV Sehora feeder 85.13 15.87
5 11KV Mugalia Chhap & Kodia feeder 79.00 29.00
6 Distribution Centre Harsola (8 feeders) 69.45 9.78
7 Distn.Centre Teesgaon (14 feeders) 50.50 38.32
8 Dhar Circle (154feeders) 48.57 38.30
9 Distn.Centre Jaora (R) (4 feeders) 57.91 14.90
10 Distn.Centre Uplai (12 feeders) 66.10 29.21
Thanks
Sample Results - East Discom (1/3)
SN Name of
Divsiion
Name of
the
33/11KV
Sub-station
Name of 11KV feeder No. of
consumer
Input in
LU
Unit
Sold in
LU
Demand
in
Rs.lacs
Collection
efficiency
%
T&D Loss % AT&C
%Loss
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14
1
O&M Sidhi Kothiya
Bhitari
Data before
commencement of
FS 478 0.52 0.3 0.72 104.17 42.31 39.90
Data after
completion of FS 669 0.65 0.52 1.01 88.12 20.00 29.50
Percentage change
39.96 25.00 73.33 40.28 -15.41 -22.31 -10.40
3
O&M Sidhi Kusmi
Kusmi
Data before
commencement of
FS 440 0.5 0.33 1.41 75.89 33.41 49.47
Data after
completion of FS 504 0.33 0.28 1.56 80.13 14.45 31.45
Percentage change
14.55 -34.00 -15.21 10.64 5.59 -18.96 -18.02
Back
Sample Results - East Discom (2/3)
Name of Town/DC/FS 11KV SURKHI FEEDER (SAGAR CIRCLE)
S.
No.
FY Input Unit
(LU)
Sold Unit
(LU)
Billing
Eff. %
T&D
Loss %
Demand
(Rs. in
lakh) Collection
(Rs. in
lakh)
Coll. Effi.
%
AT&C
Loss %
RPU
Rs./Unit
1 2009-10
(BEFORE FS) 18.12 7.80 44.15 55.85 7.85 6.30 80.30 64.55 0.35
5 2011-12
(AFTER FS) 10.04 8.65 82.88 13.86 31.54 34.89 110.63 4.71 3.48
Percentage
change -44.61 8.08 38.73 -41.99 453.87 30.33 -59.84 894%
Back
Sample Results - East Discom (3/3)
Name of Town/DC/FS 11kv SEHORA FEEDER (Sagar Circle)
S.
No.
FY Input
Unit
(LU)
Sold Unit
(LU)
Billing
Eff. %
T&D
Loss %
Demand (Rs.
in lakh)
Collection
(Rs. in
lakh)
Coll.
Effi. %
AT&C
Loss %
RPU
Rs./U
nit
1 2009-10
(BEFORE FS) 5.73 1.00 17.43 82.57 21.30 18.17 85.33 85.13 3.17
5 2011-12
(AFTER FS) 9.89 8.27 83.63 16.37 35.62 35.83 100.60 15.87 3.62
%Change 72.45 727.32 66.20 -66.20 67.23 97.15 15.27 -69.26 14%
Back
Sample Results - Central Discom
T&D AND AT&C LOSSES OF 11 KV MUGALIYA CHHAP AND 11KV KODIA FEEDER JOINTLY (A) BEFORE FEEDER SEPERATION
Month No. of Cons.
Input in LU
Sold Unit in
LU
T&D loss%
Demand Rs in Lakhs
Collection Rs in Lakhs
Collection efficiency
Billing efficiency
AT&C loss%
RPU
Apr-12 721 4.25 1.08 74.59 1.78 1.46 82% 25% 79% 0.34
(B) AFTER FEEDER SEPERATION
Month No. of Cons.
Input in LU
Sold Unit in LU
T&D loss%
Demand Rs in Lakhs
Collection Rs in Lakhs
Collection efficiency
Billing efficiency
AT&C loss%
RPU
Jun-12 2473 4.37 3.29 24.71 9.84 9.25 94% 75% 29% 2.12
Difference in %
243 3 284 (-)49.88 453 534 12% 50% (-)50% 523
Back
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTRES- HARSOLA
Total No. of 11 kV feeders-8 Village Covered- 3
11 KV feeders separated- 8 Village Benefitted- 3
Year Input in lacs Sold unit in
Lacs
Demand in
Lacs
Collection
in Lacs
Billing
Eff.
Collection
Eff.
AT&C
Losses RPU
2010-11 114.98 79.51 170.76 160.58 69.15 94.04 34.97 1.4
2011-12 130.29 98.19 210.88 224.33 75.36 106.38 19.83 1.7
Growth in 2011-
12 Compare to
2010-11
13.32 23.49 23.49 39.70 6.21 12.34 -15.14 0.33
Upto June-2011 36.29 13.89 35.44 28.28 38.28 79.80 69.45 0.8
Upto June-2012 23.78 18.39 55.71 64.99 77.33 116.66 9.78 2.7
Difference
-12.51 4.5 20.27 36.71 39.06 36.86 59.67 1.95
Growth in June-
12 compare to
June-2011 in %
-34.47 32.40 57.20 129.81 39.06 36.86 -59.67 250.71
Sample Results - West Discom (1/5)
Back
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTRES - TEESGAON
Total No.of 11 KV Feeders :- 14
Villages
Covered :- 29
11 KV Feeders Separated :- 14
Villages
Benefitted :-
29
Year Input in lacs Sold unit in
Lacs Demand in Lacs
Collection in
Lacs Collection Eff. Demand unit RPU AT&C Loss
2010-11 235.93 132.83 249.55 254.39 101.94 57.39 1.06 43.70
2011-12 251.17 156.34 338.95 323.67 95.49 59.44 1.35 37.76
Growth in 2011-
12 compare to
2010-11
6.46 17.70 35.82 27.23 -6.45 2.05 0.29 -5.94
Upto JUNE 2011 45.28 20.15 44.36 40.86 92.11 40.99 0.98 55.50
Upto JUNE 2012 43.09 26.58 66.89 62.03 92.73 57.20 1.55 38.32
Numeric
Difference in
JUNE 12
compare to JUNE
11
-2.19 6.43 22.53 21.17 0.62 16.21 0.57 -17.18
Growth in JUNE
2012 compear to
JUNE 2011 in %
-4.84 31.91 50.79 51.81 0.62 39.55 58.45 -17.18
Sample Results - West Discom (2/5)
Back
AN ANALYSIS OF - DHAR CIRCLE
Total No.of 11 KV Feeders :- 244 Villages Covered :- 1337
11 KV Feeders Separated :- 154 Villages Benefitted :-483
Year Input in lacs Sold unit in
Lacs
Demand in
Lacs
Collection in
Lacs Billing Eff.
Collection
Eff. RPU AT&C Loss
2009-10 749.00 466.55 12120.55 12215.23 62.29 100.78 1.62 37.71
2010-11 832.37 537.66 15289.52 14834.17 64.59 97.02 1.84 35.41
2011-12 1034.67 695.67 20110.84 19147.58 67.24 95.21 1.94 32.76
Growth in 2010-
11 compare to
2009-10
11.13 15.24 26.15 21.44 2.30 -3.76 0.22 -2.30
Growth in 2011-
12 compare to
2010-11
24.30 29.39 31.53 29.08 2.64 -1.81 0.11 -2.64
Upto June 2011 210.74 108.39 3708.84 3290.76 51.43 88.73 1.76 48.57
Upto June 2012 222.43 137.24 4991.96 4666.90 61.70 93.49 2.24 38.30
Growth in June
2012 compear to
June 2011
5.55 26.62 34.60 41.82 10.27 4.76 0.48 -10.27
Sample Results - West Discom (3/5)
Back
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS -JAORA(R)
Total No. of 11 KV Feeders -: 4 Villages Covered-: 17
11 KV Feeders Separated-: 4 Villages Benefitted-:17
Year Input in lacs Sold unit in
Lacs
Demand in
Lacs
Collection
in Lacs Billing Eff.
Collection
Eff.
Demand
unit RPU % loss AT&C Loss
2009-10 212.44 138.91 275.59 226.78 65.39% 82.29% 1.3 1.07 34.61% 46.19%
2010-11 205.3 145.2 292.83 266.45 70.73% 90.99% 1.43 1.3 29.27% 35.65%
2011-12 217.66 167.28 381.16 367.82 76.85% 96.50% 1.75 1.69 23.15% 25.84%
Growth in
2010-11
compare
to 2009-10
-3.36% 4.53% 6.26% 17.49% 5.34% 8.70% 0.13 0.23 -5.34% -10.55%
Growth in
2011-12
compare
to 2010-11
6.02% 15.21% 30.16% 38.04% 6.13% 5.51% 0.32 0.39 -6.13% -9.81%
Up to
May-2011 35.65 19.21 48.91 38.2 53.88% 78.10% 1.37 1.07 46.12% 57.91%
Up to
May-2012 32.39 26.78 64.52 66.41 82.68% 102.93% 1.99 2.05 17.32% 14.90%
Growth
in May-
2012
compare
to May-
2011
-9.14% 39.41% 31.92% 73.85% 28.79% 24.83% 0.62 0.98 -28.79% -43.02%
Sample Results - West Discom (4/5)
Back
AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION CENTERS - UPLAI
Total No. of 11 KV Feeders -: 12 Villages Covered-: 29
11 KV Feeders Separated-: 12 Villages Benefitted-:29
Year Input in lacs Sold unit in
Lacs Demand in
Lacs Collection in
Lacs Billing Eff. Collection Eff.
Demand unit
RPU % loss AT&C Loss
2009-10 274.4 145.42 304.91 264.11 53.00% 86.62% 1.11 0.96 47.00% 54.10%
2010-11 303.38 173.78 366.89 314.47 57.28% 85.71% 1.21 1.04 42.72% 50.90%
2011-12 348.53 186.76 422.8 429.55 53.59% 101.60% 1.21 1.23 46.41% 45.56%
Growth in
2010-11
compare to
2009-10
10.56% 19.50% 20.33% 19.07% 4.29% -0.91% 0.1 0.07 -4.29% -3.19%
Growth in
2011-12
compare to
2010-11
14.88% 7.47% 15.24% 36.59% -3.70% 15.88% 0 0.2 3.70% -5.34%
Up to May-
2011 59.07 22.81 54.98 48.26 38.62% 87.78% 0.93 0.82 61.38% 66.10%
Up to May-
2012 51.48 25.77 59.93 84.75 50.06% 141.41% 1.16 1.65 49.94% 29.21%
Growth in
May-2012
compeart
to May-
2011
-12.85% 12.98% 9.00% 75.61% 11.44% 53.64% 0.23 0.83 -11.44% -36.89%
Sample Results - West Discom (5/5)
Back