feedback on the 8th international conference on bullying and harassment 2012 copenhagen
DESCRIPTION
Feedback on The 8th International Conference on Bullying and Harassment 2012 Copenhagen. BSc. Psych. Anne Sofie Fedders. Design. Revised sample: 190 Respondents: 90 The survey was distributed by e-mail. 51 responded before the reminder e-mail was distributed. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Dias 1
Institut for Psykologi
Feedback on The 8th International Conference on Bullying and Harassment 2012 Copenhagen
BSc. Psych. Anne Sofie Fedders
September 2012
Design
Revised sample: 190 Respondents: 90
The survey was distributed by e-mail.
51 responded before the reminder e-mail was distributed.
39 responded after the reminder e-mail was distributed.
Dias 2
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 3
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Pre-conference information on the Bul-lying 2012 website
Pre-conference information on the Bullying 2012 website
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 4
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Content of pre-conference information letters rating
Content of pre-conference in-formation letters rating
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 5
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Timing of pre-conference information letters
Timing of pre-conference in-formation letters
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 6
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
The abstract submission process
The abstract submission process
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 7
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
The delegate registration process
The delegate registration process
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 8
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Usefulness of guidelines to oral and poster presentations
Usefulness of guidelines to oral and poster presentations
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 9
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Helpfulness of the organising team
Helpfulness of the organising team
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 10
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
If you stayed at one of the recom-mended accommodations how did you
like it
If you stayed at one of the recommended accommoda-tions how did you like it
September 2012
1. Pre-conference and registration
Dias 11
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Quality and usefulness of delegate bag Abstract book city maps etc
Quality and usefulness of del-egate bag Abstract book city maps etc
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 12
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Proximity of accommodation to venue if you stayed in one of the recommended
hotels
Proximity of accommodation to venue if you stayed in one of the recommended hotels
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 13
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Quality of rooms for oral presentations
Quality of rooms for oral presentations
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 14
Institut for Psykologi
Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Audio support
Audio support
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 15
Institut for Psykologi
Unacceptable Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Video support
Video support
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 16
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Helpfulness of the helpdesk reception
Helpfulness of the helpdesk reception
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 17
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Helpfulness of the practical helpers dur-ing the oral presentations
Helpfulness of the practical helpers during the oral presen-tations
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 18
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Quality of the chair persons during the oral presentations
Quality of the chair persons during the oral presentations
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 19
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Helpfulness of the organizing team dur-ing the conference
Helpfulness of the organizing team during the conference
September 2012
4. Conference venue
Dias 20
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
The quality of the food served at the conference venue
The quality of the food served at the conference venue
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 21
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Range of topics covered and discussed
Range of topics covered and discussed
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 22
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Division of abstracts into a few core themes
Division of abstracts into a few core themes
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 23
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Quality and usefulness of the abstract book
Quality and usefulness of the abstract book
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 24
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Quality of keynote presentations
Quality of keynote presenta-tions
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 25
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Quality of oral presentations
Quality of oral presentations
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 26
Institut for Psykologi
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Quality of poster presentations
Quality of poster presentations
September 2012
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 27
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Scheduling of oral presentations
Scheduling of oral presenta-tions
5. Scientific content of the conference
Dias 28
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Scheduling of poster presentations
Scheduling of poster presenta-tions
6. Social content of the conference
Dias 29
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
The quality of the evening reception at the city hall of Copenhagen
The quality of the evening reception at the city hall of Copenhagen
6. Social content of the conference
Dias 30
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
The quality of the canal tour to Hotel Admiral
The quality of the canal tour to Hotel Admiral
6. Social content of the conference
Dias 31
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
10
20
30
40
50
60
The quality of the conference dinner at Hotel Admiral
The quality of the conference dinner at Hotel Admiral
6. Social content of the conference
Dias 32
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
The overall networking opportunities
The overall networking oppor-tunities
7. Overall opinion of the conference
Dias 33
Institut for Psykologi
September 2012
Unac-ceptable
Poor Adequate Good Excellent0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
What was your overall experience of the 8th International Conference on Bully-
ing and Harassment 2012, Copenhagen?
What was your overall experi-ence of the 8th International Conference on Bullying and Ha-rassment 2012, Copenhagen?