fed_sys

Upload: maximoramallo

Post on 04-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 fed_sys

    1/5

    ANTON PELINKA

    FEDERAL SYSTEMS.

    THE EU, US AND INDIA COMPARED

    2007-2008

    WINTER

    NATIONALISM STUDIES PROGRAM

    DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

  • 7/29/2019 fed_sys

    2/5

    1. Name of Course

    Federal Systems: The EU, US and India compared

    2. Lecturer:Anton Pelinka

    3. No. of Credits and no. of ECTS credits:

    4 credits resp. 8 ECTS credits

    4. Semester or Time Period of the course

    Classes on Tuesday during the whole winter term: 11:00 12:40 and 15:30 16:40

    5. Any other required elements of the department

    No

    6. Course Level

    The course is offered for second term MA students (one year) in Nationalism Studies andin Political Science

    7. Brief introduction to the course outlining its primary theme, objective and

    briefly the place of the course in the overall program of study:

    The course is designed to focus on the analysis of federalism using the cases of threerather different systems. Despite the continental dimension, the EU, the US and India

    have in common, the three systems differ greatly:

    The United States, together with Switzerland, is considered the most traditionalfederal system. US federalism is very much the case of a bottom-up development.

    India is a comparatively new state with a combination of Westminster (British style)

    democracy and symmetrical federalism. Indian federalism has been established top-

    down.

    The EU is not a state, but perhaps a federation in the making. European

    federalism is the perfect case of a long ongoing process based on nation (member)

    states as driving forces of integration.In all cases, federalism has to be seen as an instrument to deal with national, ethnic,

    religious, social, and geographic diversity. Despite very different backgrounds, all three

    cases cannot be imagined as unitary (centralised) and democratic states. In all three cases,federal structure seems to be the only way to establish democracy.

  • 7/29/2019 fed_sys

    3/5

    8. The goals of the course

    The focus will be especially on the following questions:

    the structure of federal governments;

    the compatibility of democracy and presidentialism, resp.parliamentary rule;

    the question of identity, resp. identities;

    the preconditions of democratic federalism; party system and federal structure;

    the impact of federalism on foreign policy.

    9. The learning outcomes of the course

    The students should be enabled to understand the functions of federalism (e.g. theintegration of diverse societies) and its structures (e.g. symmetrical and asymmetrical

    federalism). As some of the students will start to design their MA thesis during the term,

    the course is also a possibility to get familiar with aspects possible linked to the research

    for the thesis (e.g. nationalism and federalism, comparing different models of federal

    political systems, etc.)

    10. More detailed display of contents.

    Week 1:

    How diversity and globalization challenge democratic systems built upon the traditional

    nation state: analysis of the necessary democratic responses

    Ruggie, Habermas, Slaughter, Plattner

    Week 2:

    The different forms of democratic governance and the logic of a vertical separation ofpower between federal state and sub-statesSodaro, Wilson

    Week 3:

    The United States of America as (together with Switzerland) the model for a bottom-up

    federal system

    DeSipio

    Week 4:

    The United States and its integration process the development from a confederation to a

    federationLipset, Glazer

    Week 5:

    The European Union a political system sui generis; its structures and its functions; its

    specificities and the parallels to already established democratic federal systemsOudenaren

  • 7/29/2019 fed_sys

    4/5

    Week 6:

    The European Union its historical background and the two logics of widening

    (enlargement) and deepening (federalization)Moravcsik, Morgan

    Week 7:

    Classes for feedback, critical assessment, and discussion about the term papers, the

    students are required to present at the end of the term

    Week 8:

    US and EU in comparison: To which extent can the EU learn from the integration

    process the US had gone throughElazar, Weiler, Schmidt, Scharpf

    Week 9:

    The Indian political system its peculiarities: a combination between British/style

    Westminster democracy and US-style federalismKohli and Basu

    Week 10:

    The Indian democracy as the necessary element of nation building power sharing as the

    requirement of integrating an extremely diverse societyPelinka

    Week 11:

    The Indian form of governance as a possible model for diverse and lesser developed

    Nariman, Chatterjee

    Week 12:

    The US, the EU and India as global actors: What are the common interests?

    Oudenaren, Mohan

    For the weeks, the reader provides the compulsory reading. Optional reading will be

    provided on a case to case basis, which will include often literature for the better

    understanding of most recent developments (e.g. the outcome of the ratification processof the EUs Reform Treaty).

    The format will be the result of what had been already proven as a rather stimulating way

    of teaching: a combination of seminar-style presentations by student, based on theliterature as assembled in the reader, and a lecture, dealing with the specific topic of the

    weak.

    11. Assessment

    The students are required to participate actively in class (This requires preparation by

    reading the designed texts). This requirement includes the necessity to at least onepresentation in class. The presentations schedule (who, what, and when) will bedecided

  • 7/29/2019 fed_sys

    5/5

    in the second week. In addition, the students have to write a term paper (appr. 5000

    words). The topic of the paper has to be decided by agreement between the student and

    the lecturer. The term paper an academic essay should demonstrate the studentsability to deal with a topic, linked to the courses general topic, in a scholarly way.

    Both requirements active participation (including presentation) and the term paper are

    to be considered equal important for the final grading. The essay will be gradedaccording to its formal academic quality (research questions, hypotheses,

    operationalisation, methodology, sources, bibliographical quality, etc.)

    The students are encouraged not only to raise any question linked to the courses topicbut also to challenge the lecturer for the sake of an academic discourse. They are advised

    to use the lecturers office hours as well as the possibility to contact him via the internet.

    It can be assumed that all the assessments are related to the achievement of the Learning

    Outcome.

    12. Office hours

    Tuesday 2:30 3:30, Wednesday 10:00 11:00