federation of the indonesian chemical industry responsible ... discussions/acsel 2015_panel... ·...

Responsible Carereg and Chemical Safety amp Security

by Muhammad Setyabudhi Zuber

Presented at

2nd Asian Conference on Safety and Education in Laboratory (ACSEL-2)

December 1-2 2015

Kampus Universitas Indonesia Depok ndash Jawa Barat

Federation of the Indonesian

Chemical Industry

1 What is Responsible Carereg

2 Responsible Care reg Security Code

3 Chemical Risk Management Related to

Safety and Security

4 Challenges

5 Close Conclusion

CONTENT

What is Responsible Carereg

Responsible Carereg is our commitment to meeting Indonesiarsquos expectations for community and environmental protection employee health and safety product stewardship and social engagement

Responsible Carereg helps RCI member companies to improve their environmental health safety and security performance as well as improving their operations in striving sustainable business


4

Responsible Carereg is the chemical industryrsquos unique global initiative that drives continuous improvement in health safety and environmental (HSE) performance together with open and transparent communication with stakeholders

Responsible Carereg embraces the development and application of sustainable chemistry helping our industry contribute to sustainable development while allowing us to meet the worldrsquos growing need for essential chemicals and the products those chemicals make possible


5


Chemical Industry To become the Chemical Management Center of Indonesia through sustainable Responsible Carereg implementation

Our Vision

wwwresponsiblecare-indonesiaorid

Member of

Responsible Carereg GlobalINTERNATIONAL

COUNCIL OF

CHEMICAL

ASSOCIATIONS

Family of Nations in 58 Association in 63 Economies

Representing more than 75 of global chemical production

Thousands of induvidual chemical companies have adopted RC and implementing the initiative throughout their

global operation

Responsible Carereg Security Code

M Setyabudhi Zuber

Executive Director amp Secretary General

Responsible Care Indonesia amp

FIKI Vice Chairman for International Affairs

December 2015

1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch

First Strategic Review Peer review element

introduced

Second Strategic Review Third-party

certification and mandatory

performance reporting

DHS Recognizes Security Code

Defining the Future New Product amp Process Safety Codes focus on

energy efficiencyrecycling

Responsible Carereg 25 Years of Continuous Improvement

Security Code

adopted

2001-

RC Indonesia Launch in 1997

Activities related to Chemical Safety amp Security

2010 ndash Aug CSS Workshop ndashUS-CSPSandia National Lab (Jakarta)

2011 ndash July Seminar on Risk Assessment Chemical Management -US-CSP SNL amp NICNAS Aust(Bandung)

2012 ndash May

CSS Workshop ndashUSCSP SNL (Jakarta) Seminar on CSM ndashMOI DFAT Australia MOFA NZ UnivIndonesia UKM Malaysia NITE Japan

2013 Seminar on Chemical Risk Assessment Method (Jakarta Feb amp Nov) APEC Chemical Dialogue (JakartaJan amp MedanJune) May 8-9)

2014

Seminar on How to Use Chemical Safely and Maintain its Security (Surabaya 14-15 Oct)

wwwresponsiblecare-indonesiaorid 9

Summit of Chemical Sector SecurityBaltimore Maryland (2012 amp 2013) Alexandria VA (2015)

10

C A E R Process Safety

Distribution Product Stewardship

Pollution Prevention

Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code

Builds on Other Responsible Carereg Codes

Security Code

7 Codes of Management Practices (7 Responsible Carereg Codes)

PUBLICSPUBLICS

INVOLVEMENTINVOLVEMENT

DISTRIBUTIONDISTRIBUTION

CAERCAER

PROCESSPROCESSSAFETYSAFETY

POLLUTIONPOLLUTIONPREVENTIONPREVENTION

EMPLOYEEEMPLOYEEHEALTH ampHEALTH ampSAFETYSAFETY

SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12

INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL SECURITY

Sources Google image

A commitment to the Security of chemical life cycle has been part program of the Responsible Carereg Indonesia (RCI)

In 2008 the RCI adopted the Responsible Carereg Security Code of Management Practices which set forth activities that chemical companies committed to take as part of their Responsible Carereg

obligations This activity has been implemented started with self-assessments and continued with Responsible Carereg Verification since 2010 by third party (independent verifier team)

RCI began an integration of Responsible Carereg Codes covering 6 Code elements and included the ldquoSecurity Coderdquo in 2010

Implementation of Chemical Security

14

How Responsible Care Security Code Work (1)

Under the Security Codersquos 13 management practices ndash which address facility cyber and transportationvalue chain

Companies must conduct comprehensive security vulnerability assessments (SVAs) and implement security enhancements under a strict timeline using methods approved by nationally recognized security experts

Companies also must obtain independent verification to prove they have made required physical site security measures identified during the SVA

15

Scope of Security Codes

1 General Security aspects (Properties threat)

2 Information (CyberIT Confidentialities)

3 Process (Sabotage Contaminant interlock system)

4 People (Trust Integrity)

Security Code Aspects

Supply Chain SecurityPhysical Site SecurityCybersecurity ndash IT

systems and process controls


Implementation Process for Plants

Companies prioritize

facilities according to

risk (Tiers 1 ndash 4)

Conduct Security

Vulnerability

Assessment (SVAs) at

facilities in priority

order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented

19Confirmed by Annual CEO Attestation

Supply Chain Cyber-systems

bull Transportation distribution

procurement

bull Management of

inboundoutbound materials

bull Know your customer

bull Value chain cooperation

bull Process controls and IT systems

bull Assess threats vulnerabilities

and consequences

bull Layers of protection

bull Rapidly changing field

Member support for Security Code implementation

Chemical Risk Management Related to Safety and Security

Risk Basics Overview

Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk

Activity Risk Perception

Safety and Security

Risk Characterization

Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab

Risk Basics Hazard vs Risk

What is wrong Hazard

bull Overloaded circuit

What are the possible outcomes

bull Blown fuse

bull Electrical shock

bull Fire

What influences the likelihood

bull Factors that lead to an event

bull Plugged in brokenfrayed cords near oily rags

What are the consequences

bull Other factors and things that follow an event

bull Voltage fire alarms evacuation Risk Sandia National Lab

Hazard and Threat

The term Hazard is used in the Chemical Safety context

For Chemical Safety Risk the hazard is the chemical material worked with in the lab

Characterizing the material allows one to determine important parameters for likelihood and consequences exposure harm

The term threat is used in the Chemical Security context

For Chemical Security Risk the threat is the potential adversary who is interested in the chemical materials

Characterizing potential adversaries allows one to determine important parameters for likelihood and consequences such means motives and opportunity

Definition of Risk

Risk is the likelihood of an undesirable event happening that involves a specific hazard or threat and has consequences

Risk is a function of

1048711Probability that an incident will occur (likelihood)

1048711Severity if the event occurs (consequence)

Risk = f (Likelihood Consequence)


Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment

A risk assessment could be defined as a procedure that analyses a particular process or situation in order to determine the likelihood and consequences of a certain adverse event

R = f(L C)

A risk assessment assignsvalues for likelihood and consequences which allows us to represent the risk of a particular adverse event on a graph

A hazardthreat is not a risk without particular adverse event

Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate

What is the Objective

Risk assessments inform the selection of appropriate laboratory chemical safety and laboratory chemical security risk mitigation measures to reduce likelihood and consequences of an adverse event form occurring

Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill

bull Accidental exposure

bull Uncontrolled reaction

Security Incident

bull Theft or diversion of dual-

use chemicals

bull Intentional release

bull Sabotage

Risk concept Applies to both Chemical Safety and Chemical Security

Chemical Safety Culture

The overall intent and effort to keep people safe from chemicals and chemical accident

ldquo that assembly of characteristics and attitudes in organizations and individuals which establishes that as an overriding priority chemical plant safety issues receive the attention warranted by their significancerdquo

Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm

Ensure that human actions are consistent appropriate and correct and human error is minimized or prevented

Chemical Security Culture

The overall intent and effort to protect chemicals from nefarious individuals

ldquo that assembly of characteristics and attitudes and behavior of individuals and institutions which serves as a means to support and enhance chemical securityrdquo

Based upon

Compartmentalization

SecrecyConfidentiality

Classification

Relies heavily on the trustworthiness honestly and integrity of individuals not to perform malicious acts

Synergy Between Safety and Security

Share principal objective of ldquothe protection of people society and the environment from the effect of harmful chemicalsrdquo

Share attributes

bull Recognized values

bull Leadership needed for success

bull Accountability

bull Personal dedication and accountability

bull Questioning attitudes but rigorous approaches to actions

bull Learning and experience driven

bull Best when fully integrated into the system

Both require a coordinated response

Some Differences Between the Two

Security

Considers deliberates acts

Emphasize confidentiality management

Involves organizations not related to chemical

Safety

Considers unintentional acts

Emphasizes open information

management

Involve only organizations related to

chemical

Sometime the two can conflict such as in emergency egress

Early challengesbull Outside the traditional EHS ldquocomfort zonerdquo

bull Lack of company in-house expertise

bull Information security vs sharing

bull Lack of common industry expectations and government intentions

bull Understanding complex supply chains

bull Security vs emerging cyber business environment

bull Employee contractor and visitor background check issues

Challenges

Currently chemical industry that implementing Responsible Carereg is still low around 10

Responsible Care Security Code has been officially adopted in Indonesia since 2010 but less than 20 of the Responsible Care companies in Indonesia which has implemented Security code

Foster a culture of security in the chemical industry is not simple but should continue to be pursued in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders

37

The role of CEO top management of the chemical industry and industry associations and government related institutions is very important

Cultural security related chemical need to start from early childhood in elementary education

RCI still need to improve the capacity building training programs in the field of Chemical Security

Collaboration between Government and Industry including RCI and industry associations in terms of security already exists but needs to be improved through a more intensive program

Challenges (contrsquod)

38

Close Conclusion

To encourage the growth of the chemical industry and protect the public and the environment Security Culture related chemical industry should be a priority for the Government and the business world

Security must be a top priority for leading chemical producers Responsible Carereg companies are leaders in chemical security and have to work closely with the Government Authorities to safeguard our communities

39

40wwwresponsiblecare-indonesiaorid

Additional Support Slides

42

Responsible Care was introduced by ASEAN Chemical Industry Club Indonesian Cemical Industry Club (ACICICIC) in 1994

The RCI established in October 23 1997 Officially launched by Minister of

Environment supported by Ministry of Industry and Ministry of Manpower

Founded by 14 companies(7 Local + 7 MNC)

Recognized as ICCA-RCLG member on August 1999 at RCLG meeting in Sao Paulo Brazil (29 companies)

Responsible Carereg in Indonesia

43

What is GPS (Global Product Strategy)

launched by ICCA in order to globally improve sound chemicals management as a part of RC activities

designed to improve communication and transparency about the management of chemical hazards and risks and safety practices across the value chain

contribution to SAICM (Strategic Approach to International Chemical Management) which aims to achieve WSSD goals

httpwwwicca-chemorgenHomeICCA-initiativesglobal-product-strategy

ICCAs voluntary initiative to globally enhance industry performance

of product stewardship

44

WSSD 2020 Goal

ldquoBy 2020 chemicals are used and produced in ways that lead to the

minimization of significant adverse effects on human health and the

environment using transparent science-based risk assessment

procedures and science-based risk management procedures

45

What is PS (Product Stewardship)

Target is health safety and environment at all stages of a product life cycle

The most effective Product Stewardship actions are holistic risk management based on hazard and exposure

Implementation of PS is strengthenedby ICCArsquos GPS Strategic Elements

PS Chemical Risk management throughout its life cycle

ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007

based on GPS Strategic Elements

46

GPS and Product Stewardship (RCGC and GPS)

Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM

Public Acknowledgement and Confidence on Chemicals

Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure

ICCArsquos Response ICCArsquos Response

47

GPSPS ndash Communicate with your customers

Product Stewardship

Life Cycle

R amp D Production Sale Use Waste

Risk Assessment and Management

( Human Health and Environment )

Data SDS and GPS Safety Summary (include exposure amp use information)

Communicate with your customers in the downstream value chain

Chemicals Policy and Health (CPampH)

Copyrightcopy 2013 ICCA All Rights Reserved

48

GPS risk assessment process

Step1 Select Substances for Risk Assessment

Step2 Gather Information

Step3 Allocate Substances into PrioritiesPriority 1 2 3 and 4

Step4 Develop Priority Relevant Information

Step5 Hazard Characterization Step6 Exposure Assessment

Step7 Risk Characterization

Step8 Document Outcome

Section OnePreparation

Section TwoImplementation



49

Section One Preparation (Step 1 to 4) - Summary







50

Hazard (Toxicity) Level

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive

Uncontrolled (Level 1)

Priority 1 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 2

Controlled (Level 2)


Limited



Strictly controlled (Level 4)


Priority-allocation in accordance with hazard and exposure levels

An important concept of this section is to allocate chemicals into ldquoPrioritiesrdquo according to an initial consideration of their hazard and or exposure potential

Priority-allocation with worst-case conditions of hazard and exposure levels

The GPS Priority system



51


By following the four steps in Section One you can prepare the ground for the implementation of the GPS risk assessment

Gathered all available hazard and exposure information (Standard parameters + Other available information)

Addressed priority chemicals in Priority Prioritized your chemicals for risk assessment

Developed further information according to the Priority

(Gather Priority-relevant information GPS Base Set)

Further Refined Risk Assessment (with more realistic condition)

Gather Priority-relevant information (GPS Base Set)

Step2

Step3

Step4



52

ExampleChemical Name TolueneCAS No 108-88-3



53

Step 2 Gather information- Hazard information (Toluene)

Hazard Endpoint Data InformationHazardous Level


Acute toxicity (skin) LD50 12400 mgkg (rabbit) X

Acute toxicity (oral) LD50 5580 mgkg (rat)

Acute toxicity (inhalation)LC50 125mgL (rat 4hr)

(NOAEC 150 mgm3human data)X

EyeSkin irritation Skin Irritation 2 X

Sensitization No Sensitization X

Mutagenicity CarcinogenicityNo Mutagenicity

Not carcinogenic in humansX

Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54

Exposure Type Description Use Descriptor

Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X

Consumer Consumer use X

Environment

Industrial operations X

ProfessionalConsumer use X

Step 2 Gather information- Exposure information (Toluene)

Exposure Level = 1 (Wide Dispersive )



55

Toluene is allocated to ldquoPriority 1rdquo

Step 3 Allocate substances into Priorities (Toluene)

Hazard Level = 2

Exposure Level = 1 (Wide Dispersive)



56

Description Data Information

a) Human health

Irritation (Eye Skin) Skin Irritation 2

Mutagenicity No Mutagenicity

Sensitization No Sensitization

Repeated dose toxicity NOAEC 1125 mgm3 (inhalation) NOAEL 625 mgkgd (oral)

Reproduction developmental toxicity test

Reproduction 2 NOAEC 2250 mgm3 (inhalation) LOAEC 330 mgm3 (inhalation)

b) Environment

Acute Toxicity to Fish LC50(96hr) 55 mgL (freshwater)64mgL (seawater)

Acute Toxicity to Daphnia LC50(48hr) 378 mgL

Acute Toxicity to Algae NOEC(72hr 96hr) 10 mgL

Chronic Toxicity to Fish NOEC(40d) 14 mgL

Chronic Toxicity to Daphnia NOEC(7d) 074 mgL

Step 4 Gather GPS Base Set - GPS Base Set for Toluene (Priority 1)

GPS Base Set for Toluene (Priority 1) is gathered

Engagement with the Government (1)

Indonesia has had a variety of laws and regulations related to chemicals but among them there is overlap giving rise to a conflict in its implementation

Since more than five years RCI actively involved in the drafting Chemical Act (the Law on Comprehensive Chemical) covers chemical life cycle hazard-risk-based as well as security and safety of chemicals as this is a strategic breakthrough to improve the integrated chemicals management

57


RCI has collaborated with the Ministry of Transportation in the preparation of regulations relating to the safety and security of transportation of chemicals (dangerous goods)

RCI in collaboration with the Ministry of Industry in the preparation of regulations related to the classification and labeling of chemicals based on the Globally Harmonized System (GHS)

RCI Support Government to establish National Chemical Safety Database as a part of ASEAN Japan Chemical Safety Database (AJCSD)

58

RCI Support Government in APEC Chemical Dialogue2011 (US) Russia (2012) 2013 (Indonesia) China (2014) Philippines (2015)

1 What is Responsible Carereg

2 Responsible Care reg Security Code

3 Chemical Risk Management Related to

Safety and Security

4 Challenges

5 Close Conclusion

CONTENT





4




5



Our Vision


Member of


COUNCIL OF

CHEMICAL

ASSOCIATIONS




global operation


M Setyabudhi Zuber




December 2015

1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch


introduced








Security Code

adopted

2001-





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58






4




5



Our Vision


Member of


COUNCIL OF

CHEMICAL

ASSOCIATIONS




global operation


M Setyabudhi Zuber




December 2015

1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch


introduced








Security Code

adopted

2001-





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


5



Our Vision


Member of


COUNCIL OF

CHEMICAL

ASSOCIATIONS




global operation


M Setyabudhi Zuber




December 2015

1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch


introduced








Security Code

adopted

2001-





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58



COUNCIL OF

CHEMICAL

ASSOCIATIONS




global operation


M Setyabudhi Zuber




December 2015

1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch


introduced








Security Code

adopted

2001-





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58



M Setyabudhi Zuber




December 2015

1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch


introduced








Security Code

adopted

2001-





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


1985 1988 1993 2003 2009 2013+BEYOND

Originates inCanada

US ProgramLaunch


introduced








Security Code

adopted

2001-





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58





2012 ndash May



2014




10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58



10




Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58





Employee Health and

Safety

Security Code


Security Code


PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58



PUBLICSPUBLICS



CAERCAER




SECURITY

OurCommitment

to Sustainability

12








14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58









14





15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58






15














Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58















Conduct Security

Vulnerability



order

CCPS

Sandia

VCAT

Implement security

enhancements

revealed by SVA

Third-party

verification that

enhancements

implemented




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




procurement

bull Management of






and consequences






Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58





Hazard vs Risk

Definition of Risk


Safety and Security


Risk Reduction

Sandia National Lab





bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58






bull Blown fuse


bull Fire







Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


Hazard and Threat







Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


Definition of Risk







Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58



Sandia National Lab

Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


Risk Assessment


R = f(L C)



Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




Risk Assessment

Risk

very

high

Lik

eli

ho

od

Consequences

very

low

moderate



Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




Sandia National Lab

Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


Safety and Security

Safety Incident

bull Spill



Security Incident


use chemicals


bull Sabotage





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58





Based upon

Openness

Transparency

Information Sharing

mmm





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58





Based upon



Classification




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




Share attributes



bull Accountability







Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58



Security




Safety



management


chemical









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58









Challenges




37






38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58







38

Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


Close Conclusion



39



42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




42







43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


43








44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


44

WSSD 2020 Goal





45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


45






ICCA PS Guidelines

Issued 7 May 2007


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


46


Chemical

Industry

Societal

Concern

Regulation

Tightening

NGO Market

RC Global

CharterGPS

Contribution

to SAICM


Promotion of PS

Various

Pressure


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58


47


Product Stewardship

Life Cycle








48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




48













49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




49








50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




50



Expo

sure

Leve

l

Wide Dispersive





Limited











51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




51









Step2

Step3

Step4



52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




52




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




53












Hazard Level = 2

not applicable



54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




54


Exposure Level


Worker

Industrial use X

Professional use X


Environment







55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




55



Hazard Level = 2




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58




56


a) Human health







b) Environment











57





58





57





58






58


federation of the indonesian chemical industry responsible ... discussions/acsel 2015_panel... ·...

Documents