federal aviation administration - faa engine focus panel · 2010. 12. 14. · • caep = committee...

12
FAA Engine Focus Panel FAA Engine Focus Panel LW Dunbar LW Dunbar GEAE GEAE November 13, 2003 November 13, 2003

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

FAA Engine Focus PanelFAA Engine Focus Panel

LW DunbarLW DunbarGEAEGEAENovember 13, 2003November 13, 2003

Notional SSBJ Propulsion RequirementsCruise @ Mach 1.5 to 2.0, altitude 50K to 70K

Overland Supersonic Operation Desired

Range: 4000 to 5000 nmiMinimum of 2 enginesNoise Stage 4 with marginNacelle geometry consistent with low boom> 2000 hrs supersonic cruise life between overhaulsEmissions at least equivalent to current commercial productionThrust reverser likely requiredEarliest availability: 2010 introduction to service

Supersonic Biz Jet CTQ’sNoise

fan pressure ratioadvanced nozzle system

Emissionsturbine temperature (T41)combustor design

Transonic ThrustRange

SFCweightdraginstallation

Lifecompressor exit temp (T3)turbine inlet temp (T41)

Engine Sonic Boom Impact• Diameter• Vehicle Area Distribution• Engine Placement• Flow Area Modulation

GEAE has full confidence that our SSBJ engine will achieve certification once the decision is made to proceed. As with any new concept, there are areas which are considered more critical and will require a joint airframe/engine risk abatement/mitigation plan to ensure certification is achieved. These areas include:

Noise AcceptanceEmissionsSonic BoomRotor BurstEngine SpacingSupersonic Aircraft Rules

Certification & Development

Development schedule for FAR 33 Cert?

Supersonic engine could be certified within ~5 –6 years

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

1 2 3Year 1

4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

1 2 3Year 1

4

A/C CertSSBJ 1st Flight

1st Engine to TestCertification Testing

Engine Certification

Cycle/Config Studies

Component Tech Dev.

Engine Mfg

EIS

Technology Demonstrator Engine

Linked to Advanced Engine demonstrator planTechnologies & Configuration Synergistic with a number of potential products

Core test as early as 2007SLS turbofan test potentially in 2008Engine available for initial flight tests 2009

Altitude test?

Emissions Goals for SSBJ Engines• No Firm Requirements Yet• Will be Using Latest Low Emissions Combustor for This Program• Selection of Overall Cycle PR Will Influence NOx

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

20 30 40Overall Engine Pressure Ratio

NO

x Em

issi

ons,

g/k

N

ICAO Emissions RegulationsCAEP/1

CAEP/2CAEP/4

• CAEP = Committee on AviationEnvironmental Protection

• CAEP/4 from 1998 Meeting

Standards for Engines with FN >6KSpecies Grams/Cycle/kN Thrust

HC 19.6CO 118.0Smoke Number: 83.6 * FN -0.274

UEET Combustor Technology

Cycle Impact on Noise and Vehicle Size

% Delta TOGW vs Cumulative Noise Margin

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Cum Margin relative to stage 3

% D

elta

TO

GW

% Delta TOGW vs Bypass Ratio

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

OBPR

% D

elta

TO

GW

% Delta TOGW vs Fan Pressure Ratio

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4

FPR

% D

elta

TO

GW

Max T3 & T41

Max T3 & T41

Additional Engine Configuration & Noise Technology’sMax T3 & T41

Stage IV - 6

Vehicle Performance Favors Highest Noise Limited Specific Thrust

Smaller Diameter

Is it feasible to be capable of attaining Stage 4 cumulative noise characteristics with Margin?

YES – But it requires a complete system solution and may require a Staged Implementation Depending on EIS.

Propulsion System Controls SidelineCombination of Propulsion System, Airframe Installation, and Flightpath Controls CutbackMainly Airframe Noise and Engine Installation Controls Approach

Propulsion System, Airframe Installation, Flightpath, and Airframe Noise All Contribute to the Cumulative Margin and Achieving Stage 4 !

SSBJ TBO Requirement?

More Than 2X TBO DifferenceFor Equal Distance Traveled

Current Bizjets

Reliability

Phoenix Goal Target4000 hr TBO

GEAE accepts the goal to achieve the 4,000 hour TBO.

Extended Time-at-TemperatureRecognized as critical life issue

addressed in QSP, LRSA and SSBJ studiesEngine design based on Mechanical Design inputs to achieve HPT disk and blade lives

T41 & T3 levels- Special attention required to mitigate high T3’s

HPT Configuration has a significant RoleSupersonic overland mission will increase Hot time

SummarySonic Boom Solution May be Complementary to Other Requirements

- Performance- Acoustics, etc.

Propulsion System can Be designed for a successful SSBJ- Durability and Market Robustness need Additional work- Emissions requirements need to be Characterized- System Noise solution needs further Demonstration

Barrier issues require integrated system solutions- Acoustics, Emissions and Sonic Boom require Demonstration- Simulated Product Environment

Configuration Synergistic with Advanced Military Systems- Technologies have a wide range of applicability- Demo Vehicle Should have wide support- We are very interested