featured presenters: harvey silverjennifer bay williams jan chappuismyron dueck

31
Featured Presenters: Harvey Silver Jennifer Bay Williams Jan ChappuisMyron Dueck Carol Commodore Embassy Suites, Lexington Preconference: July 25, 2011 Conference: July 26-27, 2011 Meeting the Challenge: Implementing Standards and Assessment Practices Register at: http://www.uky.edu/P12MathScience/ -12 MSOU Summer Conference

Upload: rowa

Post on 18-Mar-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Featured Presenters: Harvey SilverJennifer Bay Williams Jan ChappuisMyron Dueck Carol Commodore. P-12 MSOU Summer Conference. Meeting the Challenge: Implementing Standards and Assessment Practices. Embassy Suites, Lexington Preconference: July 25, 2011 Conference: July 26-27, 2011. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Featured Presenters:Harvey Silver Jennifer Bay WilliamsJan Chappuis Myron Dueck

Carol Commodore

Embassy Suites, Lexington

Preconference: July 25, 2011Conference: July 26-27, 2011

Meeting the Challenge: Implementing Standards and Assessment Practices

Register at: http://www.uky.edu/P12MathScience/

P-12 MSOU Summer Conference

New Math/Science Teacher Network

Meeting 6, Year 2March 31, 2011

Brought to you in part by KDEDelivered by P12 Math Science Outreach division of PIMSER

3

Group NormsRESPECT

• Rejoin whole group when signaled• Everyone participates• Side conversations to a minimum • Prepared for meeting• Expect to be here and present in the work• Cell phone and other electronics etiquette• Two feet rule

February Review

Chapter 5 Target MethodMatch

TestBlueprint

EffectiveMultiple Choice

Today’s Plan

DiscussionOf Study Chapter

WrappingIt

Up

YOU be George

Multiple-ChoiceQuizzes

Review&

Preview

P12 Math Science Outreach 6

Group Facilitator• Select someone to serve as your group’s

facilitator for the afternoon. • The group facilitator’s job will be to keep

your group focused, on task, and using the allotted time productively.

Chapter Sharing

• Concerning your chapter:– Explain briefly the strategy– Identify the context in which

you used the strategy– Share student

work/ideas/performance– Share your personal

reflection• What worked well? Not so

well?

Why be more strategic?

“The original concept for High Tech High grew out of the concerns of business leaders and university partners who saw that kids were leaving high school very good at memorizing facts and taking tests and doing well on them, but you ask them to apply what they know or you ask them to talk about or present their work, and they weren’t able to do that.” —Gary Jacobs

GAG Chapter 6 Debrief

• Part 1: With an elbow partner, look at your reading guide and discuss the terms/concepts for 2 minutes, along with any ‘ah-has’ etc.

• Part 2: In groups of 3-4, Share each of your 3 ‘redesigns’; negotiate to determine the top 3 school (or math/science department) ‘redesigns’ you would implement if offered the opportunity. Be ready to share with the entire group and to defend your choices.

“In the often ideologically driven debates about education, it is easy to lose sight of what matters most—which is what happens between students and teachers in real classrooms every day.” --Tony Wagner

What then, is the relationship between curriculum & instruction, 7 Survival Skills and assessment?

Curriculum & Instruction

7 Survival Skills Assessment

What is the relationship?

Deconstruction of Standards

Student Self-Assessment

Assessment for Learning Strategies(CASL Chapter 2, pages 41 – 46)

Where am I going?1. Provide a clear statement of the learning target2. Use examples and models

Where am I now?3. Offer regular descriptive feedback4. Teach students to self-assess and set goals

How can I close the gap?5. Design focused lessons6. Teach students focused revision7. Engage students in self-reflection; let them keep

track of and share their learning

Strategy 4: Teach Students to Self-Strategy 4: Teach Students to Self-Assess and Set GoalsAssess and Set Goals

• Students use test plans as a basis for evaluation of strengths and areas of study

• Students complete self-evaluation and goal-setting form on the basis of test or quiz results

Clear Targets and Student Goal Setting

x

x

x

Write numerals in expanded…

3

Write numerals in expanded…

2

Write numerals in expanded…

1

More study?

Simple mistake?

Wrong?Right?Learning Target

Problem

You are George, a third grader.

With a partner, do a little self-analysis and goal setting by completing the form.

(In this case, you will have to use a little imagination.)

You Be George• How many questions did George get wrong?

– What would his grade on this test be? – What is he likely to conclude from that grade if he doesn’t

do this kind of thinking? – How often do students like George get the opportunity to

look at a low score from this perspective? – What does research indicate students like George need?

• How might this activity be helpful in the classroom? – Who would benefit? – What would make it worth the time?

The students' role is to strive to understand what success looks like, to use feedback from each assessment to discover where

they are now in relation to where they want to be, and to determine

how to do better the next time.Rick Stiggins, 2008

Assessment:Selected Response

• Learning Targets– I can analyze student

assessments to determine item quality.

– I can analyze student assessments to determine next steps in instruction.

– I can modify questions in order to improve accuracy.

– I can design student self-assessment opportunities.

Why Accuracy Is ImportantAssessment information can be inaccurate in

one of two ways:1. We think students have mastered material

when they actually have not.2. We think students haven’t mastered

material when they actually have.

Using Assessment Results

• Using the student results for the MC quiz, analyze each item using the analysis form.

• Once completed:– Revise items if needed– Determine next steps in instruction

• Whole Class• Individuals

Determining if Revision is Needed

• Questions to consider:– How many students missed the question?– What “wrong answer” was selected? Is it

consistent among students or spread out?– Were there questions that ALL students got

correct or incorrect? May this be attributed to distractor problems? Formatting problems?

– Student self-assessment —How many students missed the question and attributed simple mistake as the reason?

Making Instructional Decisions• Questions to consider:

– How many students missed the question?– What wrong answer was chosen most often?– Were wrong answers spread among the distractors?– How did the students self-assess? Are there several “didn’t

know it” selections?• Decisions to make:

– Re-teaching needed?– Individual Instruction?

• Homework or extra practice• 1-on-1 time

– Differentiation for student groups?• Were there patterns in the overall results of the quiz?

– Continuing with unit plan?

Let’s Debrief!• What is the value in MC

analysis using student results?

• What do well constructed MC items reveal about student understanding?

• How important is adequate sampling in MC assessments?

• How could have student self-assessment impacted this process?

D

• Learning Styles• The Strategic Teacher• Global Achievement Gap• CASL

– Student Motivation– Of vs For Assessments– Deconstruction of

standards– Learning Targets– Target Method Match– Test Blueprint– Student Self Assessment– Multiple Choice Testing

• Questioning: Congruent vs Correlated

• Web 2.0 Tools• Characteristics of

Formative Assessment• Games• Instructional Strategies

– Carousel Brainstorming– 4-2-1– Associations– Question Museum– Analogies

Preview of Next Year