feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Feature Selection and Classification in Supporting Report-Based Self-Management for People with
Chronic Pain
Author:Yan Huang, Huiru Zheng, Chris Nugent, Paul McCullagh, Norman Black, Kevin E. Vowles, and Lance McCracken
Advisor: Ben-Jye Chang Student: YU-HSIEN CHO
Source: Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on Jan. 2011, Journals & Magazines
![Page 2: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OUTLINE• I. Introduction• II. Issue• III. Motivations• VI. Approaches• VI. Numerical results• V. Conclusion
![Page 3: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
• Older people has increased, that two thirds of people who reached retirement age had at least two chronic conditions.
![Page 4: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
• Machine learning approach, self-reporting data collected from the integrated biopsychosocial treatment, in order to identify an optimal set of features for supporting self management.
![Page 5: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Fig. 1. Assessment interface of the PSMS and the assessment workflow for self-management
Introduction
![Page 6: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Introduction
• We assess the feasibility of applying automated classification techniques to identify "low" and "better" health status levels from self-reporting data and explore an appropriate classification algorithm.
![Page 7: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
OUTLINE• I. Introduction• II. Issue• III. Motivations• VI. Approaches• VI. Numerical results• V. Conclusion
![Page 8: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Issue
• Numbers of selected questions and classification performance of a person’s health status level.
• Which ranking method and which classification model had the best performance.
![Page 9: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
OUTLINE• I. Introduction• II. Issue• III. Motivations• VI. Approaches• VI. Numerical results• V. Conclusion
![Page 10: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Motivations
• Traditional health care, expensive, consuming significant resources , inconvenient.
• PWCP, self-management of their health care has been shown to be effective in terms of improving their QoL.
PWCP: People With Chronic PainQoL: Quality of Life
![Page 11: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
OUTLINE• I. Introduction• II. Issue• III. Motivations• VI. Approaches• VI. Numerical results• V. Conclusion
![Page 12: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Approachs
A.Dataset
187 subjects who suffered from chronic pain
8 types of questionnaire total number of questions was 329, answers had values
"pretreatment“ stage as " low health level “, "posttreatment“ stage as " better health level “
16 (8.6%) of the patients withdrew , 171 (91.4%) of the patients completed the treatment
training sets:114 patients, testing sets:57 patients
![Page 13: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Approachs
B.Methods
Four feature selection methods, rank the questions.
1.SVM-RFE(Support Vector Machine With Recursive Feature Elimination):
The ranking criterion for feature i :
Methods: Step 1: Train an SVM on the dataset. Step 2: Rank features according to the criterion c. Step 3: Eliminate the lowest ranked feature. Step 4: If more than one feature remains, return to step 1.
![Page 14: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Approachs
2.OneR: 1-level decision tree
Q.1
1 21
2 16
3 22
4 20
5 35
Steps:
For each feature fiFor each value v from the domain of fiSelect the set of instances where feature fi has value vLet c = the most frequent class in that setAdd the clause “if feature fi has value v then the class is c”to the rule for feature fiOutput the rule with the highest classification accuracy.
![Page 15: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Approachs
3.Information Gain:based on Shannon’s information theory and can be calculated from (1)–(3)
A represents a feature (question) of an instance, which has n values
two classes(pre. and post.),each has 114 instances
![Page 16: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Approachs
![Page 17: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Approachs
4. X2 Statistic:
m, number of answers for one question(feature) ni , frequency of that answer i Pi , probability of that answer i n , total frequency for all the questions’ answers, 228×329
![Page 18: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Approachs
C. Classification Performance Assessment• Purpose : classify the person’s appropriate
health status
• Classifier: C4.5,Naive Bayes, SVM, MLP
![Page 19: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Approachs
1.Overall accuracy:
2.Area Under the ROC Curve(AUC):
Suggested as a tool, which can evaluate the performance of the classification alorgithm
![Page 20: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
OUTLINE• I. Introduction• II. Issue• III. Motivations• VI. Approaches• VI. Numerical results• V. Conclusion
![Page 21: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Numerical results
There were no significant differences between the feature ranking methods in overall classification accuracy. (any of the four feature ranking methods can be used)
There were significant differences between the classifiers for each ranking method.
The MLP classifier has been identified as the best option to build the classification model for PSMS in the sense that both overall accuracy and AUC were very high.
![Page 22: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
OUTLINE• I. Introduction• II. Issue• III. Motivations• VI. Approaches• V. Numerical results• IV. Conclusion
![Page 23: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Conclusion
• Feedback information for their self-management
• Changing their behavior,lifestyle, and care plan in order to achieve effective self-management of their chronic condition
![Page 24: Feature selection and classification in supporting report based self-management with chronic pain](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042614/557cbd61d8b42a1b0c8b4fec/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Thank you for
your listening