fdg-petlackssufficientsensitivitytodetectmyxoid...

4
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Sarcoma Volume 2007, Article ID 36785, 3 pages doi:10.1155/2007/36785 Case Report FDG-PET Lacks Sufficient Sensitivity to Detect Myxoid Liposarcoma Spinal Metastases Detected by MRI Joseph H. Schwab and John H. Healey Section of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell University Medical School, New York, NY 10021, USA Received 26 November 2006; Accepted 21 March 2007 Recommended by David Harmon Purpose. To document a case of myxoid liposarcoma in which PET scan was less sensitive than MRI in detecting spinal metastasis. Materials and Methods. The case of a 65-year-old female with a history of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) of the thigh resected 5 years previously and now presenting with low back pain is presented. Her medical oncologist ordered an FDG-PET scan to evaluate distant recurrence. Subsequently, an MRI of her spine was obtained by her surgeon. Results. The FDG-PET scan was obtained 1 week prior to the MRI, and it did not show increased glucose uptake in the spine. Her MRI did show increased signal intensity in her lumbar spine. CT needle biopsy confirmed the lesion to be metastatic MLS. Conclusion. FDG-PET scans are utilized to detect distant recurrence of cancerous lesions. Myxoid liposarcoma has a unique propensity to metastasize to the spine. Previous reports have documented the unreliability of bone scintigraphy to diagnose these metastases. Our report demonstrates that FDG-PET may also lack the sensitivity needed to detect these lesions. We advocate total spine MRI when screening for metastases in this population when they present with back pain. Copyright © 2007 J. H. Schwab and J. H. Healey. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarco- mas and myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) is the second most com- mon subtype. Soft tissue sarcomas tend to metastasize to the lungs, however myxoid liposarcoma may metastasize to un- usual extrapulmonary sites including bone [13]. Several re- ports have documented cases of metastatic MLS to the spine. It is unclear which imaging modality has the greatest abil- ity to detect these lesions. Bone scintigraphy has been shown to be unreliable [46]. FDG-PET scans are being utilized in many centers to detect metastases, however their sensitivity and specificity is not known. We present a case of metastatic MLS to the spine which was not detected by FDG-PET but had a positive MRI. 1. CASE REPORT A 65-year-old female with a history of an AJCC stage III popliteal myxoid liposarcoma developed mild low back pain 5 years after her initial surgery. The primary tumor had been treated with wide resection followed by 6500 cGy to the popliteal fossa. She had been disease-free and was seen by her medical oncologist for a routine check when she complained of back pain. Whole body FDG-PET (Figure 1(a)) did not show increased glucose uptake in the lumbar spine (black arrow). Subsequent axial MRI (Figure 1(b)) showed a soft tissue component to a mass in the lumbar spine (white ar- row). Sagittal MRI (Figure 1(c)) of the lumbar spine demon- strates a lesion in the second lumbar vertebrae on T1 and T2 weighted images. A CT-guided biopsy confirmed the di- agnosis of metastatic myxoid liposarcoma. The patient was treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Her back pain subsided but she developed further systemic disease and died. 2. DISCUSSION Screening for metastatic liposarcoma is controversial. Chest CT misses a significant number of metastases as MLS has a propensity to metastasize to extrapulmonary sites such as the one in our case report. Bone scintigraphy is not a reli- able diagnostic test for metastatic myxoid liposarcoma [46]. This case demonstrates that FDG-PET scanning may lack sucient sensitivity in diagnosing MLS metastases. The low degree of glucose uptake may reflect low metabolic activity

Upload: others

Post on 02-Nov-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FDG-PETLacksSufficientSensitivitytoDetectMyxoid ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/srcm/2007/036785.pdf · 2 Sarcoma (a) (b) L2 L2 (c) Figure 1: (a) The PET scan did not demonstrate

Hindawi Publishing CorporationSarcomaVolume 2007, Article ID 36785, 3 pagesdoi:10.1155/2007/36785

Case ReportFDG-PET Lacks Sufficient Sensitivity to Detect MyxoidLiposarcoma Spinal Metastases Detected by MRI

Joseph H. Schwab and John H. Healey

Section of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,Weill Cornell University Medical School, New York, NY 10021, USA

Received 26 November 2006; Accepted 21 March 2007

Recommended by David Harmon

Purpose. To document a case of myxoid liposarcoma in which PET scan was less sensitive than MRI in detecting spinal metastasis.Materials and Methods. The case of a 65-year-old female with a history of myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) of the thigh resected 5 yearspreviously and now presenting with low back pain is presented. Her medical oncologist ordered an FDG-PET scan to evaluatedistant recurrence. Subsequently, an MRI of her spine was obtained by her surgeon. Results. The FDG-PET scan was obtained 1week prior to the MRI, and it did not show increased glucose uptake in the spine. Her MRI did show increased signal intensity inher lumbar spine. CT needle biopsy confirmed the lesion to be metastatic MLS. Conclusion. FDG-PET scans are utilized to detectdistant recurrence of cancerous lesions. Myxoid liposarcoma has a unique propensity to metastasize to the spine. Previous reportshave documented the unreliability of bone scintigraphy to diagnose these metastases. Our report demonstrates that FDG-PETmay also lack the sensitivity needed to detect these lesions. We advocate total spine MRI when screening for metastases in thispopulation when they present with back pain.

Copyright © 2007 J. H. Schwab and J. H. Healey. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work isproperly cited.

Liposarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarco-mas and myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) is the second most com-mon subtype. Soft tissue sarcomas tend to metastasize to thelungs, however myxoid liposarcoma may metastasize to un-usual extrapulmonary sites including bone [1–3]. Several re-ports have documented cases of metastatic MLS to the spine.It is unclear which imaging modality has the greatest abil-ity to detect these lesions. Bone scintigraphy has been shownto be unreliable [4–6]. FDG-PET scans are being utilized inmany centers to detect metastases, however their sensitivityand specificity is not known. We present a case of metastaticMLS to the spine which was not detected by FDG-PET buthad a positive MRI.

1. CASE REPORT

A 65-year-old female with a history of an AJCC stage IIIpopliteal myxoid liposarcoma developed mild low back pain5 years after her initial surgery. The primary tumor had beentreated with wide resection followed by 6500 cGy to thepopliteal fossa. She had been disease-free and was seen by hermedical oncologist for a routine check when she complained

of back pain. Whole body FDG-PET (Figure 1(a)) did notshow increased glucose uptake in the lumbar spine (blackarrow). Subsequent axial MRI (Figure 1(b)) showed a softtissue component to a mass in the lumbar spine (white ar-row). Sagittal MRI (Figure 1(c)) of the lumbar spine demon-strates a lesion in the second lumbar vertebrae on T1 andT2 weighted images. A CT-guided biopsy confirmed the di-agnosis of metastatic myxoid liposarcoma. The patient wastreated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).Her back pain subsided but she developed further systemicdisease and died.

2. DISCUSSION

Screening for metastatic liposarcoma is controversial. ChestCT misses a significant number of metastases as MLS hasa propensity to metastasize to extrapulmonary sites such asthe one in our case report. Bone scintigraphy is not a reli-able diagnostic test for metastatic myxoid liposarcoma [4–6].This case demonstrates that FDG-PET scanning may lacksufficient sensitivity in diagnosing MLS metastases. The lowdegree of glucose uptake may reflect low metabolic activity

Page 2: FDG-PETLacksSufficientSensitivitytoDetectMyxoid ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/srcm/2007/036785.pdf · 2 Sarcoma (a) (b) L2 L2 (c) Figure 1: (a) The PET scan did not demonstrate

2 Sarcoma

(a) (b)

L2 L2

(c)

Figure 1: (a) The PET scan did not demonstrate increased glucose uptake in the lumbar spine. (b) and (c) Axial and sagittal MRI demon-srated abnormal signal intensity in the second lumber vertebrae.

found in the myxoid/paucicelluar regions of these tumors.MRI appears to be the most reliable method of diagnosingspinal metastasis in myxoid liposarcoma.

The negative PET scan may reflect low metabolic activ-ity within the myxoid/paucicelluar regions of these tumors.It is possible that the absence of appreciable glucose uptakereflects the inability of the PET scans to detect those cells thatare actively utilizing glucose within the myxoid stroma. Theradiolabeled glucose may not be able to reach the cells em-bedded in the matrix. However, our case represents a high-grade liposarcoma with at least a 5% round cell component.One would expect that these areas could be detected by FDG-PET. Further study is necessary to determine whether the ra-tio of round cells relative to myxoid stroma is important.

Spine metastasis should be considered when one is eval-uating a patient with a history of MLS presenting with backpain. Bone scintigraphy and FDG-PET do not seem to be

sensitive enough to detect these lesions. We recommend MRIof the spine when one is confronted with a patient complain-ing of back pain with a history of myxoid liposarcoma. WhileMRI seems to be more sensitive than FDG-PET, neither isspecific, and biopsy should be considered for histologic con-firmation.

REFERENCES

[1] C. R. Antonescu, S. J. Tschernyavsky, R. Decuseara, et al., “Prog-nostic impact of P53 status, TLS-CHOP fusion transcript struc-ture, and histological grade in myxoid liposarcoma: a molecu-lar and clinicopathologic study of 82 cases,” Clinical Cancer Re-search, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 3977–3987, 2001.

[2] S. H. Estourgie, G. P. Nielsen, and M. J. Ott, “Metastatic pat-terns of extremity myxoid liposarcoma and their outcome,”Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 89–93, 2002.

Page 3: FDG-PETLacksSufficientSensitivitytoDetectMyxoid ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/srcm/2007/036785.pdf · 2 Sarcoma (a) (b) L2 L2 (c) Figure 1: (a) The PET scan did not demonstrate

J. H. Schwab and J. H. Healey 3

[3] S. E. Kilpatrick, J. Doyon, P. F. M. Choong, F. H. Sim, and A. G.Nascimento, “The clinicopathologic spectrum of myxoid andround cell liposarcoma: a study of 95 cases,” Cancer, vol. 77,no. 8, pp. 1450–1458, 1996.

[4] R. Kirollos, G. Koutsoubelis, S. Ross, and S. Al Sarraj, “An un-usual case of spinal metastasis from a liposarcoma,” EuropeanJournal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 303–305, 1996.

[5] T. Ishii, T. Ueda, A. Myoui, N. Tamai, N. Hosono, and H.Yoshikawa, “Unusual skeletal metastases from myxoid liposar-coma only detectable by MR imaging,” European Radiology,vol. 13, supplement 6, pp. L185–L191, 2003.

[6] J. S. Khurana, D. I. Rosenthal, A. E. Rosenberg, and H. J.Mankin, “Skeletal metastases in liposarcoma detectable onlyby magnetic resonance imaging,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Re-lated Research, no. 243, pp. 204–207, 1989.

Page 4: FDG-PETLacksSufficientSensitivitytoDetectMyxoid ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/srcm/2007/036785.pdf · 2 Sarcoma (a) (b) L2 L2 (c) Figure 1: (a) The PET scan did not demonstrate

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

The Scientific World Journal

International Journal of

EndocrinologyHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Volume 2013

ISRN Anesthesiology

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

PPARRe sea rch

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

ISRN Allergy

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

BioMed Research International

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

ISRN Addiction

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

ISRN AIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Clinical &DevelopmentalImmunology

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Volume 2013

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2013Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

ISRN Biomarkers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2013

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of