fcp video rubric april 2010
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: FCP Video Rubric April 2010](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022100404/577d37ea1a28ab3a6b96a9f7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
8/9/2019 FCP Video Rubric April 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fcp-video-rubric-april-2010 1/6
Flat Classroom™ Video Assessment Rubri
Student Name Project:
Video Number
Design and Technical QualityCriteria (5-6) (3-4) (1-2) 0
Effective Sufficient Limited
Points
Person AssessingVideo:
4Use of multimedia toolsto express ideas
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other levels
4Sound qualityand balance
betweenmusic/video and
voice-over (if any)
Clear; no or littledistortion of sound;easy to understand,adequate pace.Appropriate balanceis achieved betweenmusic/sound andvoice at all times
Mostly clear; may
have somedistortion of soundor pace may be toofast or too slowtherefore interferingwith understandingof narration.Music/sound or voice may be usedrather than both andgenerally a goodbalance is achieved
Difficult or impossible to hear or understand; useof audio may belimited andineffective
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other levels
4SpecialEffects andTransitions
Special effects andtransitions are usedcreatively andspecifically toenhance the finalmessage
Special effects andtransitions enhancethe final message toa limited extent
Special effects andtransitions do notenhance or interferewith the finalmessage
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other levels
4Clip EditingProcess
All or most videoclips and imageshave beeneffectively edited to
improve the impactof the artifact
Some video clipsand images havebeen edited whichhas improved the
impact of the artifactto a limited degree
Video clips andimages have beenpoorly edited and donot enhance theimpact of the artifact
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other
levels
4Length of video
minutes long;maintains interestand is anappropriate lengthfor the message
(no marks in thissection)
(no marks in thissection)
Under 1 minute or over 5 minutes
![Page 2: FCP Video Rubric April 2010](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022100404/577d37ea1a28ab3a6b96a9f7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
8/9/2019 FCP Video Rubric April 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fcp-video-rubric-april-2010 2/6
Synthesis of Design and Construction of Ideas
Criteria (5-6) (3-4) (1-2) 0
Excellent fit Adequate fit
Total points
4Fit withsubmission
theme
Limited fit. Videomay fit better with adifferent theme thanwhat it wassubmitted under
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other levels
4Constructionof content
Systematicsynthesis of information is
clearly based ontopic research
Some synthesis of information based
on research onthe topic
Synthesis of information issuperficial and notclearly related to
research on thetopic
The work does notmeet the standard
described in other levels
4Organizationand presentation
of content
Content ispresented in a waythat is creative or tells a story thatmakes a point or teaches a lesson;well-craftedintroduction and aneffectively
structuredprogression of topics or story
Content ispresented in a waythat tries to becreative or tell astory; reasonablywell structuredprogression of
topics or storyincluding anintroduction
Presentation is poor and interferes withunderstanding of content and ispoorly organized;there may be an
introduction andsome attempt tostructure topics
The work does not
meet the standarddescribed in other levels
4Editing of content
Content is by andlarge free of spelling/grammatical errors andtechnical glitches
Content maycontain minor spelling/grammatical errorsand/or anoccasional minor technical glitch
Content containsmany spelling/grammatical errorsand/or a number of technical glitches
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other levels
4Evidence of collaboration
v eo; ou sourcevideo is included,
source is creditedand the use of itmay or may not beseamless
(no marks in thissection)
v eo s nc u e ,source is NOT
obviously creditedand the use of itmay or may not beseamless
The work does not
meet the standarddescribed in other levels
4Credit topeople andsources of information
Full and correctcredit given to allpeople and sources;Creative Commonsdesignationspecified
Credit given topeople and sources;Creative Commonsmay or may not beshared; minor errorsmay occur
Credit given topeople and sourcesis incomplete or haslots of obviouserrors; CreativeCommons probablynot evident
The work does notmeet the standarddescribed in other levels
![Page 3: FCP Video Rubric April 2010](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022100404/577d37ea1a28ab3a6b96a9f7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
8/9/2019 FCP Video Rubric April 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fcp-video-rubric-april-2010 3/6
Revised: April 2010
Out of 100
We acknowledge the tireless dedication to excellence as shown by volunteers Steve Madsenand Mark van ‘t Hooft in this process.
SCORE
![Page 4: FCP Video Rubric April 2010](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022100404/577d37ea1a28ab3a6b96a9f7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
8/9/2019 FCP Video Rubric April 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fcp-video-rubric-april-2010 4/6
6
6
6
6
6
30 0
possible points
Points for this video
![Page 5: FCP Video Rubric April 2010](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022100404/577d37ea1a28ab3a6b96a9f7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
8/9/2019 FCP Video Rubric April 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fcp-video-rubric-april-2010 5/6
6
6
6
6
6
6
36 0
Possible points
Points for this video
![Page 6: FCP Video Rubric April 2010](https://reader037.vdocuments.us/reader037/viewer/2022100404/577d37ea1a28ab3a6b96a9f7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
8/9/2019 FCP Video Rubric April 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fcp-video-rubric-april-2010 6/6
66 00%
pointspossible
points for this video