fb newspaper

4
Family Business Issue 2, 15/02/15 “...The relationship between performance and ownership concentration should vary by the level of legal protection afforded small shareholders” Nkem Ike- Nwabuoku Elena Barona In this paper, we consider the relationship between performance and ownership concentration in a large number of publicly traded and privately held companies located in smaller European economies (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Ireland, and Ukraine). These countries represent the five legal families (German, French, Scandinavian, Common Law, and Eurasian, respectively), yet are characterized by fairly illiquid and small stock markets. This paper is the first cross- country study we know of to explore the relationship between corporate performance and ownership concentration for both public and private firms from all Hall et al June 1 2013 “Ownership and Performance in Europe” F a m i l y B u s i n e s s

Upload: nkemike

Post on 08-Oct-2015

152 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Elena and Nkem's FB Newspaper

TRANSCRIPT

“...The relationship between
performance and ownership
concentration should vary
protection afforded small
between performance and ownership
publicly traded and privately held
companies located in smaller European
economies (Austria, Belgium, Finland,
represent the five legal families (German,
French, Scandinavian, Common Law, and
Eurasian, respectively), yet are
stock markets. This paper is the first cross-
country study we know of to explore the
relationship between corporate
 
“Ownership and Performance in Europe”
 
down the sample by size and by one-digit
SIC industry category. We conclude with
some implications for the literature and for
future research.
Ownership Concentration and
results. Although some studies find that
ownership concentration and performance
most recent salient finding (Demsetz and
Villalonga, 2001) is that in an environment
where ownership structure is endogenous -
where shares can be freely traded in a
liquid equity market - ownership structure
and performance arise together, and we
should expect no clear relationship
between them.
relationship between ownership and
whether the controlling block is held by a
single shareholder, or by a coalition of 
shareholders. (Bolton and von Thadden
[1998] present a theoretical model that
specifies conditions when either dispersed
or concentrated ownership may be ideal.)
In environments with poor legal protection
(e.g., Bulgaria as analyzed by Atanasov,
2005), a single blockholder will be able to
divert a large portion of the value away
from minority shareholders. This diversion
could take many forms: transfer pricing o
intermediate goods that reduces profits,
loans made to other firms or individuals at
interest rates that provide subsidies to the
borrower, and even outright asset stripping
(selling corporate assets at below-market
prices to another entity fully owned by the
majority shareholder). For these reasons,
we might expect to see a negative
relationship between return on assets
(ROA) and ownership concentration by a
single bockholder in environments with
 
 
Solu"ion Rea#$ed
  O%ne&s$i'
he is the best candidate to assume full control and
highest market share of the
 business (56%)
  T$e (usiness
remain as allocated
shares as private and not
 public
the current management contract system and not the
franchise system
T$e Family
family mansion with all members still living
harmoniously and
ene&a"ion "o #ome- Will "$e s"&u#"u&e
o+ "$e di.ision o+ "$e s$a&es sus"ain su#$
#$anes o& %ill i" $a.e "o (e &e.ised-
 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uv8_ioE3iI 
 
The Harilela rothers !cloc"wise #rom #ro$t% &eor'e(  )eter( &ary( *i"e( ob a$+ Hari
 Source: Ho$' ,o$' &e$eral -hambre o# -ommerce(
hhtp://www.chambre.or'.h"/i$#o/member_a_wee"/harilela.asp.