fazia/indra scientific program ganil …scientific program ganil experiments: equilibrium constants...
TRANSCRIPT
FAZIA/INDRA Scientific ProgramGANIL experiments:
Equilibrium constants
R. Bougault, LPC Caen for the FAZIA collaboration
FAZIAFrance, Italy, Poland, Romania
new
FAZIA Demonstrator192 telescopes
Si(300m)/Si(500m)/CsI(10cm)
Blocks of 16 (20x20mm2) telescopes
with in vacuum FEE
(digitized signals for Pulse Shape
identification)
Extend (A,Z) identification
FAZIA
SHORT TERM 2019-…
FAZIA coupled with INDRA
GANIL: 58,64Ni@35-65 A.MeV
INDRA
Existing GANIL
INDRA multi-detector• (A,Z,E) for light charged
particles
• (Z,E) for heavier fragments
The basic FAZIA module(looking very standard, but actually somewhat special)
1st
Si2d
Si
CsI(Tl) + photodiode
Si(300m)/Si(500m)/CsI(10cm)
20x20mm2
The basic FAZIA module(looking very standard, but actually somewhat special)
1st element: reverse mount 300 μm thick, nTD Silicon of doping uniformity
(2% RMS) adapted to Pulse Shape Analysis of signals
1st
Si2d
Si
CsI(Tl) + photodiode
Identification by PSA
on 1st Si
The basic FAZIA module(looking very standard, but actually somewhat special)
1st element: reverse mount 300 μm thick, nTD Silicon of doping uniformity
(2% RMS) adapted to Pulse Shape Analysis of signals
2nd element: reverse mount 500 μm thick, nTD Silicon for redundant PSA
1st
Si2d
Si
CsI(Tl) + photodiodeIdentification by
ΔE1- E2
The basic FAZIA module(looking very standard, but actually somewhat special)
1st element: reverse mount 300 μm thick, nTD Silicon of doping uniformity
(2% RMS) adapted to Pulse Shape Analysis of signals
2nd element: reverse mount 500 μm thick, nTD Silicon for redundant PSA
3rd element: 10 cm long CsI(Tl) crystal, coupled to Si-photodiode
1st
Si2d
Si
CsI(Tl) + photodiode
Identification by
(ΔE1+ ΔE2) - E3
The basic FAZIA module(looking very standard, but actually somewhat special)
1st element: reverse mount 300 μm thick, nTD Silicon of doping uniformity
(2% RMS) adapted to Pulse Shape Analysis of signals
2nd element: reverse mount 500 μm thick, nTD Silicon for redundant PSA
3rd element: 10 cm long CsI(Tl) crystal, coupled to Si-photodiode
First and second Silicon detectors are cut out of a <100> crystal along a
properly selected direction in order to avoid channelling.
1st
Si2d
Si
CsI(Tl) + photodiode
Identification by
(ΔE1+ ΔE2) - E3
Identification by
ΔE1- E2
Identification by PSA
on 1st Si
CsI
FAZIA PSA performance: Z
(First Silicon detector ONLY)
No limits seen
for Z
identification.
Progress with
respect to
previous results
is evident.
Z=54
129Xe + 58Ni @ 35 MeV/n
EN
ER
GY
(ch
an
nel)
First Si Charge signal Rise Time (ns)
DE E
CsI
FAZIA operation has definitely confirmed the superior performance of this correlation
PSA-based mass discrimination up to Z ≈ 20 is available using this correlation, with
refined digital processing with the now used faster ADCs.
Z=63
FAZIA PSA performance: Z and A
(First Silicon detector ONLY)
DE E
CsIDE E
No channelling with a
properly cut Silicon…
Note full Z identification
Isotopic (mass)
identification up to Z~25
with ~5GeV full range
FAZIA PSA performance: DE/E
Z=5Z=54
129Xe + 58Ni @ 35 MeV/n
FAZIA Scientific Program
• Nuclear matter Equation of State• Density, Temperature, (N-Z)/A
• Cluster in nuclear medium
• Nuclear matter Transport properties• In medium nucleon-nucleon interaction
• Hot nucleus Thermodynamics• Level density at finite temperature
• Phase transition, spinodal
IMPORTANCE OF (A,Z) Identification of reaction products
GANIL, LNS, LNL
Nuclear Matter Equation of StateSymmetry energy versus density
J. Margueron, R. Hoffmann Casali, F. Gulminelli Phys. Rev. C 97, 025805 (2018)
Nuclear EOS (meta-modeling): high order Taylor expansion
Varying all
empirical
parameters
together (+/- s)
𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
SY
MM
ET
RY
EN
ER
GY
DENSITY
2018 status
Constraints:
• Experimental data/Model
prediction
• Functionals:
• 35 Skyrme
• 11 RMF
• 4 RHF
• 2 ab_initio
Nuclear Matter Equation of StateSymmetry energy versus density
J. Margueron, R. Hoffmann Casali, F. Gulminelli Phys. Rev. C 97, 025805 (2018)
Nuclear EOS (meta-modeling): high order Taylor expansion
Varying all
empirical
parameters
together (+/- s)
𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
SY
MM
ET
RY
EN
ER
GY
DENSITY
DENSITY
SY
MM
ET
RY
EN
ER
GY
Varying only Ksym
Nuclear Matter Equation of Stateat very low densities
K. Hagel, J.B. Natowitz, G. Röpke Eur. Phys. Journal A 50 (2014) 39
Prediction of the nuclear EOS : The symmetry energy at subsaturation
density and finite temperature
Data versus
• Quasiparticle Mean-Field Approach (RMF without cluster)
• Quantum Statistical (QS) approach (with clusters)
In the low-density region: the symmetry energy is
strongly depending on temperature
Mean field (no cluster): linear
increase of the symmetry energy.
QS: formation of clusters leads to an
increase of the symmetry energy at
low densities.
IMPORTANCE OF CLUSTERS
+ and o: data Texas A&M
Heavy-Ion collisionsHeavy-ion collisions at Fermi energies:
unique tool to study low density exotic nuclear matter
(region located at mid-rapidity)
Study of the chemistry/particle composition
Low density window
124Xe
B. Tsang
Thank you for the picture
Equilibrium constant KcData from NIMROD detector
TEXAS A&M
(mid-rapidity region, central collisions)
AT VERY LOW DENSITIES
Z 11𝐻 + (𝐴 − 𝑍) 0
1𝑛 ↔ 𝑍𝐴𝑋
Chemistry of proto-neutron star
(neutrino-sphere)
Measure in medium effects (Helena Pais)
Cold Neutron Star
2.Neutronization &
by
emission
3. Long-term cooling:
Neutrino cooling epoch
Photon cooling epoch
few minutes
105 years
csm.ornl.gov
1. Accretion of matter onto the central object,
known as the proto-neutron star (hot and lepton rich)
Cooling
neutrino
proto-Neutron Star
• Dominated by neutrinos.
• Large part of the process occurs
near the surface (neutrinosphere)
which is composed of warm low
density neutron rich material.
Clusters/Symmetry energy
influence the neutrino response of
the neutrinosphere material.
Core Collapse Supernova explosion
INDRA@GANIL experimentEquilibrium Constants 2d measurement
INDRA = 4pi multidetector
(A,Z,E) for light charged particles
(Z,E) for heavier fragments
136,124Xe+124,112Sn 32 A MeV
Analysis restricted to the forward part of the c.m.
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Selection: central events & ½ rapidity
CENTRAL EVENTS
½ rapidity production
½ rapidity=60°-90° angles
Quasi-projectile and mid-rapidity sources (in the c.m.)
Ecm (MeV)
𝐝𝐌
𝐝𝐄𝐜𝐦𝐝𝛀𝐜𝐦
124Xe+124Sn 32 A MeV
c.m. angle=60°-90°(mid-rapidity)
Central collisions
INDRA@GANIL experimentBasic observables: energy spectra of detected particles
Scenario: Hot expanding source
Detected particle energy spectra = Temperature + Coulomb
Particle energy spectra
at emission time:
Coulomb correction.
Surface energy
Surface velocity (Vsurf)
time2>time1
time1
For each step/bin of Vsurf
(i.e time) coalescence n,p
to form a cluster.
Ec = 10 MeV per Z
(Szi ½ rapidity)
Texas A&M analysisFor each step/bin of Vsurf (i.e time) coalescence n,p
to form a cluster.
with
Albergo et al. Il Nuovo Cimento 89 (1985) pp1-28
(equilibrium)
RVsurf = Y(2H) Y(4He)/Y(3H)Y(3He)
Coalescence radius
in
momentum space
Coalescence volume
(density)
T.C. Awes et al. PRC24 (1981) 89
A. Mekjian PL89B (1980) 177
Texas A&M analysis: comments!For each step/bin of Vsurf (i.e time) coalescence n,p
to form a cluster.
with
Albergo et al. Il Nuovo Cimento 89 (1985) pp1-28
(equilibrium)
RVsurf = Y(2H) Y(4He)/Y(3H)Y(3He)
Coalescence radius
in
momentum space
Coalescence volume
(density)
Rnp is n/p of the
evolving source
½ rapidity neutron
spectra are not measured
(Texas A&M and INDRA):
deduced from 3H and 3He
production
Mn=Mp (M3H/M3He)
INDRA data: equilibrium
achieved
Coulomb Ec not measured
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Evolving source N/Z ratio deduced from 3H/3He ratio
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Blue: 124Xe+112Sn
Difference for the two systems reflects different initial N/Z
𝜌(3𝐻)
𝜌 3𝐻𝑒=
𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛 2 𝜌(𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛)
𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛 𝜌 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛 2 =𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛
𝜌 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Time sequence: proton rich material emission then neutron rich.
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Blue: 124Xe+112Sn
𝜌(3𝐻)
𝜌 3𝐻𝑒=
𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛 2 𝜌(𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛)
𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛 𝜌 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛 2 =𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛
𝜌 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛
TIME
Suggestion: looks like EES model of Friedman
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Blue: 124Xe+112Sn
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Coalescence radius in momentum spaceEvolving source N/Z ratio included
NO DIFFERENCE between N/Z reaction (thus n/z evolving source)
n/p from 3H/3He systematic error (possible to correct with models)
Comment concerning neutrons
Model correction or compare observables using 3H/3He and not n/p
n/p ratio compared to 3H/3He ratio
for a given proton fraction (0.41)
RMF MODEL (FSU) – different coupling constants
𝜌(3𝐻)
𝜌 3𝐻𝑒∝
𝜌 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛
𝜌 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛
(Helena Pais, private communication)
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Same temperature for all studied systems
(lcp production are very different!)
RVsurf = Y(2H) Y(4He)/Y(3H)Y(3He)TEMPERATURE
INDRA@GANIL experiment
VOLUME
(Density = nucleons/Volume)
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Idem TexasA&M: deuton are different (« fragile »)
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Blue: 124Xe+112Sn
VOLUME
(Density = nucleons/Volume)
Same results for the different systems
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Blue: 124Xe+112Sn
EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS versus DENSITY
Idem for all systems
INDRA@GANIL experimentEQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS versus DENSITY
COMMENT:
Neutron density is not measured and is
deduced from proton density multiplied by 3H/3He (Texas A&M and INDRA).
For model comparison: would be better to use
the experimental prescription.
INDRA experiment: conclusion
Analysis: framework of Texax A&M
• We confirmed the very low densities
measurements of Texas A&M.
• Equilibrium constants d, t, 3He, 4He
and 6He (new!).
• Equilibrium constants differences: steeper
with INDRA data.
• Comments about Coulomb and n/p versus 3H/3He.
FAZIA/INDRA exp.
Extend Kc measurements to heavier isotopes
Thresholds
FAZIA A & Z identification
80Kr+40-48Ca @ 35 A MeV IsoFazia experiment, June 2015, LNS Catania
D. Gruyer et al.
Supernova explosionSupernova explosion occurs via core-collapse in very massive stars (M>8Msun)
Present best 3D hydro simulations do not produce successful explosions
– Model and progenitor dependence - Great sensitivity to the microphysics
Color: electron fraction
• From Symmetric matter (0.5) red
• To Neutron matter (0) blue
T. Fischer et al. Astro. Phys. Journal 194:39 (2011)
Phase space covered in Core-Collapse Supervova simulations
TE
MP
ER
AT
UR
E (
MeV
)
Baryon DENSITY (fm-3)
15 MSUN progenitor
EOS controls explosion
HI collisions (T, density)
Reign title: CHIH-HO, AD 1054-1055
Reign title: CHIA-YU, AD 1056-1063
Emperor JEN TSUNG (AD 1023-1063)Jen Tsung used nine reign titles, casting coins for all of them
“In the first year of the period Chih-ho (1054), the 5th
moon, the day chi-ch’ou (July 4th) (a “guest-star”)
appeared appromately several inches south-east of
T’ien-kuan (Tauri). After more than a year it gradually
become invisible”.
On the day hsin-wei (of the 3rd moon of the 1st year of
the period Chia-yu (April 17, 1056) the Chief of the
astromomical Bureau reported that from the 3th moon of the 1st year of the period
Chih-ho (June 9-July 7,1054) a guest-star had appeared In the morning in the eastern
heavens……….
Written around 1350
INDRA@GANIL experimentImpact parameter selector:
transverse energy of lcp
Analysis restricted to the forward part of the c.m.
INDRA@GANIL experimentQuasi-projectile (0°-30°) mid-rapidity (60°-90°)
For central events: EQUILIBRIUM (124+124=136+112) for ½ rapidity and QP
Impact parameter selector:
transverse energy of lcp
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Quasi-projectile and mid-rapidity sources (in the c.m.)
𝐝𝐌
𝐝𝐕𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐟𝐝𝛀𝐜𝐦
Vsurf (MeV)
124Xe+124Sn 32 A MeV
c.m. angle=60°-90°(mid-rapidity)
Central collisions
INDRA@GANIL experiment
L. Qin et al. PRL108 (2012)
INDRA
(preliminary)
RVsurf = Y(2H) Y(4He)/Y(3H)Y(3He)
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Nuclear Matter Equation of StatePrediction of the nuclear EOS :
• Directly from Ab-initio approaches
• Directly from more simple interactions (Skyrme,…)
• From experimental measurements
It is possible to do:
• Taylor expansion around saturation density (empirical property)
Binding energy => 휀(𝜌𝑛 + 𝜌𝑝, 𝜌𝑛 − 𝜌𝑝) = 휀𝑖𝑠 𝜌𝑛 + 𝜌𝑝 + 휀𝑖𝑣 𝜌𝑛 + 𝜌𝑝 (𝜌𝑛−𝜌𝑝
𝜌𝑛+𝜌𝑝)2+⋯
Isoscalar 𝜌𝑛 + 𝜌𝑝 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 ⇒ 휀𝑖𝑠 = 𝐸𝑠𝑎𝑡 +1
2𝐾𝑠𝑎𝑡𝛿
2 +1
3!𝑄𝑠𝑎𝑡𝛿
3 +1
4!𝑍𝑠𝑎𝑡𝛿
4
Isovector 𝜌𝑛 − 𝜌𝑝 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 ⇒ 휀𝑖𝑣 = 𝐸𝑠𝑦𝑚 + 𝐿𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿 +1
2𝐾𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿
2 +1
3!𝑄𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿
3 +1
4!𝑍𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿
4
𝛿 =(𝜌𝑛+𝜌𝑝) − 𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
3𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
휀𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑦𝑚𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑦 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦: 𝑆(𝜌𝑛 + 𝜌𝑝)
e does not change under (n,p) interchange, odd terms=0 (charge invariance of strong interaction).
Nuclear Matter Equation of StateIsoscalar 𝜌𝑛 + 𝜌𝑝 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 ⇒ 휀𝑖𝑠 = 𝐸𝑠𝑎𝑡 +
1
2𝐾𝑠𝑎𝑡𝛿
2 +1
3!𝑄𝑠𝑎𝑡𝛿
3 +1
4!𝑍𝑠𝑎𝑡𝛿
4
Isovector 𝜌𝑛 − 𝜌𝑝 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 ⇒ 휀𝑖𝑣 = 𝐸𝑠𝑦𝑚 + 𝐿𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿 +1
2𝐾𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿
2 +1
3!𝑄𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿
3 +1
4!𝑍𝑠𝑦𝑚𝛿
4
𝛿 =(𝜌𝑛+𝜌𝑝) − 𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
3𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡Empirical parameters at saturation density:
• Esat: saturation energy,
Ksat: incompressibility modulus,
Qsat: isoscalar sknewness,
Zsat: isoscalar kurtosis.
• Esym: symmetry energy,
Lsym: slope,
Ksym: isovector incompressibility,
Qsym: isovector sknewness,
Zsym: isovector kurtosis.
If you know all empirical parameters, EOS is known
Nuclear Matter Equation of StatePrediction of the nuclear EOS :
• « Experimental » Not directly accesible from experiments without the use of a theoretical model
Bao-An Li, Xiao Han Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 276
Sym
metr
yE
nerg
yat r
sa
tS
lope
at r
sa
t
Nuclear Matter Equation of StatePrediction of the nuclear EOS :
• Ab-initio approaches and more simple interactions (Skyrme,…)
𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
J. Margeron, R. Hoffmann Casali, F. Gulminelli nucl-th 1708.06894
Nuclear Matter Equation of State
𝜌𝑠𝑎𝑡
J. Margeron, R. Hoffmann Casali, F. Gulminelli nucl-th 1708.06894
Prediction of the nuclear EOS : all predictions together (meta-modeling)
DENSITY
SY
MM
ET
RY
EN
ER
GY
DENSITY
SY
MM
ET
RY
EN
ER
GY
Only Lsym variation Only Ksym variation
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Coalescence radius in momentum spaceEvolving source N/Z ratio removed
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
Blue: 124Xe+112Sn
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Coalescence radius in momentum spaceEvolving source N/Z ratio removed
DIFFERENCE between N/Z reaction (thus n/z evolving source)
INDRA@GANIL experiment
Coalescence radius in momentum spaceEvolving source N/Z ratio included
Black: 124Xe+124Sn
INDRA@GANIL experimentINDRA = 4pi multidetector
(A,Z,E) for light charged particles
(Z,E) for heavier fragments
Cold Neutron Star
2.Neutronization &
by
emission
3. Long-term cooling:
Neutrino cooling epoch
Photon cooling epoch
few minutes
105 years
csm.ornl.gov
1. Accretion of matter onto the central object,
known as the proto-neutron star (hot and lepton rich)
Cooling
neutrino
Core Collapse Supernova explosion
FAZIA Scientific Program
• Nuclear matter Equation of State• Density, Temperature, (N-Z)/A
• Cluster in nuclear medium
• Nuclear matter Transport properties• In medium nucleon-nucleon interaction
• Hot nucleus Thermodynamics• Level density at finite temperature
• Phase transition, spinodal
IMPORTANCE OF (A,Z) Identification of reaction products
GANIL, LNS, LNL