fault management abstract

Upload: christopher-jackson

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Fault Management Abstract

    1/2

    Integrated Fault Management System in PON: Research Challenges, Development and Future Issues:

    Wider deployment of fiber in the last mile is driven by increased customer needs for high capacity

    communication. This deployment requires solutions that reduce the operators OPEX. Passive optical

    network (PON) is being considered as one of the best candidate for next-generation optical access

    solutions. It is a fast emerging architecture that uses only passive components between the customer

    and the central office. PON carries vast amount of bandwidth in the near future, thus issues relating totheir protection and maintenance are becoming more crucial. Yet the need of a cost-efficient fully

    reliable and accurate monitoring solution supporting fault detection, identification, and localization in

    different fiber access topologies will be a key part of those solutions. Moreover, PON operators need a

    monitoring system for the physical layer to guarantee high service quality. This monitoring system is

    necessary during the fiber installation, final network installation testing, regular operation of the

    network, and for fault localization. To achieve this, a certain path redundancy should be added to a PON

    by providing several alternative, diversely routed paths. Dissimilar access network environments may

    require different protection schemes. Redundancy may be added to an entire PONs topology, or to only

    a part of the PON. The International Telecommunication Union - Telecommunication Standardization

    Sector (ITU-T) G.983.1 described a set of to two protection schemes, which are type B and type C

    protection. This has two important consequences. First, the physical PON infrastructure is not entirelyvisible to the network management system (NMS) for fault management operations. Second, failures

    within the fiber plant are likely to entail service disruption before being detected, leading to revenue

    losses and customer dissatisfaction. In addition to those protection schemes, due to the high capital

    expenditures incurred by the deployment of such protection, operators have resorted to

    troubleshooting and restoration once faults are detected. Troubleshooting is an important network

    maintenance function that involves locating and identifying any source of fault in the network. The

    above-mentioned ITU-T protection configurations make no specific provisions to identify and localize

    faults within the optical infrastructure and defer the task to maintenance standards (L series). ITU-T L.53

    (2003) is the first standard to specifically address the maintenance of PONs by recommending the use of

    optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR)-based techniques for troubleshooting. However, a new

    challenge has been appeared in PON networks. The network now becomes a point-to-multipoint (P2MP)

    with passive optical splitter placed in the field. This network architecture introduces a new challenge for

    network testing which requires enhanced test and measurement techniques. In addition, these

    techniques must be capable of measuring the performance of a single bidirectional ber link that carries

    three wavelengths simultaneously. Most of the monitoring techniques which are reliable and cost-

    effective misses the fault localization feature which is a very important task for any monitoring

    technique. This missed feature leads us to divide the monitoring procedure into two main steps. The

    first step is fault detection to determine the faulty branch among the different branches in PON. This

    should be achieved by using a reliable, cost-effective techniques. The second step is accomplished by

    dispatching technicians to the faulty branch in the field and injecting an OTDR signal to exactly

    determine the location of the fault. However, dispatching technicians increases the OpEx of the

    network. Designing a centralized monitoring technique with full capability, i.e. a technique that

    performs fault detection and localization from the CO without need for dispatching technicians is still anopen issue for further research. Therefore, there is a growing need for the monitoring of the PON fiber

    plant. PON monitoring technology automatically identifies and localizes faults of the in-service PON

    optical infrastructure. In doing so, it provides the NMS with enhanced optical infrastructure visibility in

    real time, thus speeding up the detection and localization of faults. Monitoring avoids the operational

    expenditures (OPEX) and large service restoration times of offline troubleshooting, thus enabling wider

    service differentiation and stronger QoS guarantees. In addition, it paves the way to potentially

    enhanced physical layer protection mechanisms. Furthermore, to operate in-service, the desired

  • 7/29/2019 Fault Management Abstract

    2/2

    monitoring technology should act transparently to the data band signals such as the L and C bands.

    Lastly, the protection schemes also should target higher performance, lower cost or scalability to the

    next generation PON architecture (e.g., higher split ratio > 128 and beyond), including WDM, TDM over

    WDM and LR-PON which intended to extend the reach from 20 up to 100 km distances and beyond.

    Consequently, the monitoring technology requires simple design, fabrication, and implementation

    procedures to minimize the cost.

    The lack of a centralized, comprehensive, efficient and inexpensive solution for the PON fault

    management still present many challenges and requirements for the physical layer monitoring system.

    Possible Issues:

    1. Architecture or technique that performs fault detection and localization from the CO without needfor dispatching technicians, thus increasing the QoS guarantees.

    2. In-service monitoring technology that is performing monitoring without affecting the data bandsignals.

    3. Centralized fault monitoring and restoration architectures or techniques that support NG-PONarchitecture such as: TDM-PON, WDM-PON and hybrid over WDM-PON.

    4. The integration of physical layer with other surveillance functions in the higher layer protocols toproduce an efficient and complete monitoring system.