fatigue management case for endorsement final documents/fatigue...• tlif2010 apply fatigue...

TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0 Case for Endorsement i

CASE FOR ENDORSEMENT FOR TLI TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS

TRAINING PACKAGE

Release 3.0

TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0 Case for Endorsement ii

CONTENTS A. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 1

Industry Reference Committee submitting the Case for Endorsement ...................................... 1

Skills Service Organisation responsible for preparing the Case for Endorsement .................... 1

Title and code for each of the training package components that are submitted for approval ............................................................................................................................................................... 1

Relevant Case for Change details ..................................................................................................... 2

B. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL ..................................................... 2

1. Description of work undertaken and why ....................................................................................... 2

2. Decision being sought from the AISC ............................................................................................... 3

C. EVIDENCE OF INDUSTRY SUPPORT ........................................................................................ 4

1. IRC written evidence of support ........................................................................................................ 4

2. Evidence of consultation with all relevant stakeholders ............................................................... 4

3. Evidence that states/territories have been actively engaged and provided advice ................... 4

4. Advice about alternative approaches explored .............................................................................. 4

5. Report/s by exception......................................................................................................................... 4

6. Evidence that key stakeholders (including training providers) are aware of the expected impact of the changes ........................................................................................................................ 5

D. Industry expectations about training delivery ................................................................... 5

1. Advice about industry’s expectations of training delivery ............................................................. 5

Industry priorities and expectations ................................................................................................ 5

Industry’s imperatives and timelines for implementation of the components .......................... 6

Reflection of contemporary work organisation and job profiles.................................................. 6

Supporting movement of skills within and across organisations and sectors ........................... 6

Credit arrangements existing between Training Package qualifications and higher education qualifications ........................................................................................................................................ 6

2. Traineeships and apprenticeships .................................................................................................... 6

E. Implementation of the new training package .................................................................... 7

1. Advice about how training package components meet occupational and licensing requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 7

2. Implementation issues of note and management strategy .......................................................... 7

Meeting the diversity of individual and enterprise needs ............................................................. 7

Supporting equitable access and progression of learners ............................................................ 7

Supporting learner transition between education sectors ........................................................... 7

3. Advice about implementation ........................................................................................................... 8

Supporting implementation across a range of settings ................................................................ 8

TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0 Case for Endorsement iii

Supporting sound assessment practice ........................................................................................... 8

Support the availability of necessary places so students can meet work placement requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 8

Public/private training and assessment services ............................................................................ 9

Enterprises ........................................................................................................................................... 9

Policy environment ............................................................................................................................. 9

Supporting implementation through compliance with National Register requirements ......... 9

Data on VET delivery and participation ............................................................................................ 9

F. Quality assurance reports ................................................................................................... 10

1. Independent Quality Report ............................................................................................................ 10

2. AIS Declaration .................................................................................................................................. 10

3. Companion Volume Implementation Guide ................................................................................. 10

4. Statement of evidence against the Training Package Quality Principles ................................... 10

G. Implementation of the COAG Industry Skills Council reforms to training packages.... 11

1. How the decision being sought from the AISC would support the COAG Industry and Skills Council reforms to training packages ................................................................................... 11

2. Evidence of completion of the training package development work assigned by the AISC in the Case for Change ..................................................................................................................... 11

3. Evidence that training package component/s are prepared for publication ............................ 11

H. A copy of the full content of the proposed training package components ................... 11

ATTACHMENT A: Modification History ....................................................................................... 12

ATTACHMENT B: Stakeholder Consultation .............................................................................. 13

Members of the Transport and Logistics Industry Reference Committee ........................................ 13

Members of the Fatigue Management Technical Advisory Committee ............................................. 14

State/Territory Training Authority (STA) contacts ................................................................................. 15

ATTACHMENT C: Quality Report ................................................................................................. 17

Section 1 – Details of draft Training Package components ......................................................... 17

Section 2 – Compliance with The Standards for Training Packages ........................................... 18

Section 3 – Comments on how the draft Training Package components meet the quality principles ............................................................................................................................................ 20

TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0 Case for Endorsement 1

A. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

Industry Reference Committee submitting the Case for Endorsement

Transport and Logistics Industry Reference Committee (IRC)

Skills Service Organisation responsible for preparing the Case for Endorsement

Australian Industry Standards Limited (AIS)

AIS is a Skills Service Organisation (SSO) that undertakes professional activities for the following IRCs:

• Aviation • Corrections • Electrotechnology • ESI Generation • ESI Transmission, Distribution and Rail • Gas • Maritime • Public Safety • Rail • Transport and Logistics • Water.

AIS also provides technical, operational and secretariat services to enable IRCs to undertake industry engagement and to develop training packages and other products.

This submission puts forward a Case for Endorsement for the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0. It includes the following units of competency that have been developed in direct response to a request by the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) to support the fatigue management accreditation process.

Title and code for each of the training package components that are submitted for approval

Three new fatigue risk management units of competency.

Unit of Competency code Unit of competency title

TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system

Five revised qualifications.

Qualification code Qualification title Release

TLI21216 Certificate II in Driving Operations Release 2.0 TLI31216 Certificate III in Driving Operations Release 2.0 TLI42016 Certificate IV in Logistics Release 2.0 TLI42116 Certificate IV in Driving Operations Release 2.0 TLI50415 Diploma of Logistics Release 3.0


Relevant Case for Change details

Activity Order reference: AISL/TPD/2015−16/001

Activity Start Date: 16 May 2016 Activity Finish Date: 31 March 2017

The Australian Industry and Skills Committee (AISC) requested the preparation and development of three new units of competency to be published in the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package:

• TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system • TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system • TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system

B. DESCRIPTION OF WORK AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL

1. Description of work undertaken and why

On behalf of the Transport and Logistics IRC, AIS has prepared and developed three new units of competency for the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0, based on the following existing three units of competency on fatigue management:

• TLIF2010 Apply fatigue management strategies • TLIF3063 Administer the implementation of fatigue management strategies • TLIF4064 Manage fatigue management policy and procedures.

The three new units of competency have been developed to support the NHVR fatigue management accreditation process. Currently, industry is allowed to operate under a National Heavy Vehicle Accreditation Scheme (NHVAS) that allows drivers to drive additional hours per day using the accreditation scheme. The current training package units of competency that are being used by the regulator to address fatigue management were not designed for NHVR accreditation. Safety and non-compliance with the current accreditation system are the key drivers for this work. The development of units of competency specifically aligned to the NHVR's fatigue management accreditation requirements will ensure that the regulator and industry have greater certainty that workers can demonstrate the knowledge and skills to operate safely and compliantly. It will also enable transport businesses to meet the training requirement for the NHVAS. The units currently being used for fatigue management accreditation do not fully address the skills and knowledge requirements for NHVR accreditation scheme. The NHVR fatigue management accreditation supports increased transport efficiency, while improving road safety. At the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting, it was agreed that the three new units of competency will be packaged in the following qualifications:


2. Decision being sought from the AISC

This submission puts forward a case for the endorsement of three new fatigue risk management units that have been developed in accordance with the Training Package Products Policy, the Standards for Training Packages 2012 and the Training Package Development and Endorsement Process Policy, and the inclusion of these three units in the general elective units for five qualifications.

Evidence of consultation with states and territories, and evidence that the views of all key stakeholders have been considered is also provided in this document.

This Case for Endorsement is approved by the Transport and Logistics IRC and is submitted to the AISC through the Department of Education and Training for AISC consideration.

Code Qualification TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system

TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system

TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system

TLI21216 Certificate II in Driving Operations (Release 1)

General elective units

TLI31216 Certificate III in Driving Operations (Release 1)


TLI42116 Certificate IV in Driving Operations (Release 1)



TLI42016 Certificate IV in Logistics General elective units


TLI50415 Diploma of Logistics (Release 2)




C. EVIDENCE OF INDUSTRY SUPPORT

1. IRC written evidence of support

The Transport and Logistics IRC members endorsed the TAC recommendation to put forward the fatigue risk management units of competency and relevant revised qualifications to the AISC for endorsement. The IRC members support the draft units and the analysis of the anticipated impact of the change on the industry and on the vocational education and training (VET) sector. Written evidence of this support was obtained on 28 February 2017.

2. Evidence of consultation with all relevant stakeholders

During development of the three fatigue risk management units of competency, AIS used the following communications strategies to ensure relevant stakeholders were consulted:

• Face-to-face meetings, phone, video/teleconference meetings and emails to key industry stakeholders

• IRC member communications to their relevant industry networks using various methods • Emails to State and Territory Training Authorities (STAs) and VET regulators • Email alerts on project progress to stakeholders providing project information • Information about the project, progress updates and draft materials posted on the AIS website

throughout the life of the project • TAC meetings.

See Attachment B: Stakeholder Consultation for a list of organisations and individuals consulted.

3. Evidence that states/territories have been actively engaged and provided advice

State and territory industry stakeholder views were sought and all feedback was presented to TAC members during the development of the three fatigue risk management units of competency. All state and territory feedback was considered during the consultation periods and the draft materials were prominent on the AIS website project page for sector-wide consultation.

State and territory industry stakeholders were advised that there were no components proposed for deletion from the National Register and advice was provided on the possible impact of implementing the proposed training package components.

4. Advice about alternative approaches explored

TAC members were aware of the minimum standard arrangements that IRCs are to adhere to. The members did discuss and consider future technology and technical equipment available to industry. No alternate view or alternative arrangements were proposed to the TAC members by industry stakeholders that would have better suited the needs of their industry or the project outcomes.

5. Report/s by exception

There is no report by exception for the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0 being submitted to the AISC.


6. Evidence that key stakeholders (including training providers) are aware of the expected impact of the changes

Key stakeholder views were sought and all feedback received was presented to TAC members during the development of the three fatigue risk management units of competency. Stakeholder feedback was considered and discussed at TAC meetings and all decisions made at these meetings were documented.

As part of the AIS communication strategy, all key stakeholders were regularly informed of the anticipated impact of the changes during the consultation periods.

There is no training package component proposed for deletion from the National Register being submitted to the AISC.

D. INDUSTRY EXPECTATIONS ABOUT TRAINING DELIVERY

1. Advice about industry’s expectations of training delivery

Industry priorities and expectations

The proposed fatigue risk management units have been developed to address NHVR requirements for when an enterprise is applying for accreditation under the NHVAS, operating within the road transport sector.

The industry expectation is that people assessed as competent in these three units will be equipped with the appropriate skills and knowledge to operate effectively, efficiently and compliantly in a road transport enterprise that operates under the NHVAS.

Due to the geographical issues faced by industry there is also an expectation that these units of competency can be delivered online and via face to face. Training providers will focus on providing quality training and assessment that meets the assessment requirements identified in the units.

Via the consultation process, wider industry feedback has ensured delivery and assessment components have been thoroughly examined and amended to meet industry requirements.

It is also expected that training provided by registered training organisations (RTOs) will address the identified need and that individuals will attain skills that are relevant and transferable across industries and enterprises, by providing quality training and assessment that is consistent and meets the outcomes identified by the regulator.

Specific training delivery strategies requested by industry are listed in the Companion Volume Implementation Guide (CVIG).

The new units of competency are able to be delivered by all RTOs who have the qualification/s they are packaged in on their scope of registration or who have the new individual unit/s of competency added to their scope of registration.

However, if an RTO wishes to deliver the units of competency for NHVR accreditation purposes, the RTO must first be approved by the NHVR. The approval process for RTOs to deliver these units of competency for accreditation purposes will be administered by the NHVR.


RTOs who are not approved by the NHVR to deliver the units of competency on their behalf are still able to deliver the units for a qualification outcome or a Statement of Attainment outcome, just not for NHVR accreditation purposes.

Industry’s imperatives and timelines for implementation of the components

The timeline for implementation of the fatigue risk management units of competency will align with the NHVR’s finalisation of amendments to the current fatigue management accreditation process.

Reflection of contemporary work organisation and job profiles

With increasing costs within the road transport sector, the opportunity to operate higher productivity vehicles for longer periods assists industry to alleviate the rising costs of road transport distribution. Currently, the NHVAS is in place to assist in road safety, however there were identified gaps in the skills and knowledge of the current endorsed fatigue management units that did not meet the regulatory compliance and the safety requirements of drivers operating for the extended periods.

The development of the new fatigue risk management units ensures that road transport enterprise owners and schedulers are provided with the necessary skills and knowledge to operate compliantly within the NHVAS and to manage their duty of care.

Supporting movement of skills within and across organisations and sectors

The three new units of competency have been developed to support the NHVR fatigue management accreditation process, which allows enterprises to gain efficiencies; they have broad application across organisations and different workplace environments.

Consequently, other industry sectors may find the three units of competency applicable to their needs.

Credit arrangements existing between Training Package qualifications and higher education qualifications

There is currently no credit transfer arrangement between the proposed units of competency in the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package and higher education qualifications.

2. Traineeships and apprenticeships

The proposed units of competency would be suitable for a traineeship or an apprenticeship – should these units /s be selected as an elective in a qualification that is used as a traineeship or apprenticeship.

A training provider’s training and assessment strategies and practices, including the amount of training provided, must be consistent with the requirements of training package/s and/or VET accredited courses and enable each learner to meet the requirements for each unit of competency in which they are enrolled.


E. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEW TRAINING PACKAGE

1. Advice about how Training Package components meet occupational and licensing requirements

The three new units of competency have been designed for specific job roles in the road transport sector to enable road transport enterprises to meet the NHVR accreditation requirements.

These units of competency were requested by the NHVR to provide the skills and knowledge to enable individuals and enterprises in the road transport sector to operate safely and compliantly within the NHVAS.

The relevant regulatory body, the NHVR, is supportive of the draft endorsed components due to their direct involvement in the development, consultation and validation processes.

The requirements of the accreditation scheme come from the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL). The units of competency will be a mandatory requirement for enterprises and their staff if they are seeking accreditation under the NHVAS. To deliver and assess these units for ‘accreditation purposes’ RTOs will require to be approved by the NHVR.

2. Implementation issues of note and management strategy

Meeting the diversity of individual and enterprise needs

The three fatigue risk management units of competency outlined in this submission have been developed in consultation with organisations, regulators and individuals across a range of road transport industry sectors.

Stakeholders consulted were associated with a range of organisations, industry associations and the regulator, representing a wide variety of workplace and state and territory requirements and environments. This included the NHVR (the regulator) who provided specific advice and guidance around the HVNL in developing the final draft of the units of competency.

Supporting equitable access and progression of learners

The Equity Review undertaken for the three units of competency provides evidence that the draft endorsed components meet the requirements of flexibility and functionality. Access to training and mobility within and between industry sectors is supported by industry.

In each unit the assessment requirements state that ‘Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate’.

Supporting learner transition between education sectors

There are no formal transition arrangements between the vocational education and training sector and the higher education sector for the units being submitted to the AISC.


3. Advice about implementation

Supporting implementation across a range of settings

The TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0 CVIG provides advice on implementation.

These units of competency can be delivered and assessed in the workplace or in a simulated environment. They support implementation across a range of settings by providing guidance on assessment that encourages assessment in a variety of contexts and applications. The units can be modified for distance-based learners and cultural appropriateness, and are suitable for the level of communication, language, literacy and numeracy capabilities of the work being performed.

Supporting sound assessment practice

Industry is committed to sound assessment practice that ensures assessment is fair and reliable and is evidenced by knowledge, skills and work performance that meet the agreed industry standard. This imperative is reinforced by the need to respond to technological change and to provide solutions to economy-wide issues.

As a minimum, assessors and assessment must satisfy applicable regulatory requirements, which include the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (current at the time of assessment).

Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.

The assessment requirements within the proposed units specify:

• Performance evidence • Knowledge evidence • Assessment conditions.

Evidence must demonstrate that the learner has successfully met the requirements of the elements and performance criteria in the units.

Where these units are being delivered for the learner to gain NHVR accreditation or a learner is required to have the specific unit of competency for the purpose of working at an enterprise operating under a NHVR accreditation scheme, the qualification or specific unit of competency will need to be delivered by an NHVR approved RTO.

Support the availability of necessary places so students can meet work placement requirements

Implementation of the fatigue risk management units of competency is critical to the NHVR changes to the national heavy vehicle accreditation scheme. Stakeholders support the implementation of the three fatigue risk management units of competency to improve productivity and to be compliant while operating under the NHVAS.


Public/private training and assessment services

There are currently a number of training providers with the capacity to deliver units of competency, skill sets and qualifications in this area.

Training providers wanting to deliver and/or assess against the proposed fatigue risk management units of competency will need to update their scope of registration if these qualification/s are not already on their scope of registration or to add these new individual unit/s to their scope of registration.

For delivery and assessment for national heavy vehicle accreditation purposes, the training provider must be approved by the NHVR.

The assessment requirements in the proposed units of competency have been written to assist training providers in assessing the units in a variety of environments and workplace contexts.

Enterprises

By incorporating the three units of competency in the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0, enterprises will have access to personnel with high level, transferable skills across the industry.

Policy environment

Training and VET policies have been addressed during the development process through consultation with STAs.

STAs, registration and accrediting bodies and training providers will need to ensure that processes implemented are valid and in line with government policy.

Supporting implementation through compliance with National Register requirements

The draft endorsed components meet the requirements for the Standards for Training Packages and the National Register (i.e. training.gov.au) and therefore present no structural barriers at the systems implementation level.

Data on VET delivery and participation

As the proposed fatigue risk management units of competency are new units of competency, there is no current NCVER participant data available.


F. QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS

1. Independent Quality Report

The Quality Report provides confirmation that the draft endorsed components meet the Standards for Training Packages 2012. Please see Attachment C for the full report.

2. AIS Declaration

AIS declares that the draft endorsed components meet the requirements of the:

• Standards for Training Packages 2012 • Training Package Development and Endorsement Process Policy • Training Package Products Policy • Training Product Development Programme Guidelines.

3. Companion Volume Implementation Guide

AIS and the Transport and Logistics IRC confirm that the CVIG is available and has been quality assured.

4. Statement of evidence against the Training Package Quality Principles

The Transport and Logistics IRC confirms that evidence against the following quality principles has been obtained as part of the development of the draft endorsed components listed in this Case for Endorsement:

1. Reflect identified workforce outcomes 2. Support national (and international) portability of skills and competencies, including reflecting

licensing and regulatory requirements 3. Reflect national agreement about the core transferable skills and core job-specific skills

required for job roles as identified by industry 4. Be flexible to meet the diversity of individual and employer needs, including the capacity to

adapt to changing job roles and workplaces 5. Facilitate recognition of an individual’s skills and knowledge, and support movement between

the school, vocational education and higher education sectors 6. Support interpretation by training providers and others through the use of simple, concise

language and clear articulation of assessment requirements.


G. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COAG INDUSTRY SKILLS COUNCIL REFORMS TO TRAINING PACKAGES

1. How the decision being sought from the AISC would support the COAG Industry and Skills Council reforms to training packages

Completion of the training package development work and extensive industry consultation with relevant stakeholders confirms that the draft endorsed components:

• do not duplicate existing unit outcomes from within the VET system • meet the NHVR requirements for national heavy vehicle fatigue management accreditation

requirements • will improve the efficiency of the training system through the creation of units that can be

used by multiple industry sectors.

2. Evidence of completion of the training package development work assigned by the AISC in the Case for Change

The Transport and Logistics IRC has provided in writing that the development work required by Activity Order AISL/TPD/2015−16/001 has been completed. This document is in the form of an email from the Transport and Logistics IRC chair. The work has also been completed to the satisfaction of the NHVR as per the requirements in the Activity Order.

3. Evidence that training package component/s are prepared for publication

The Quality Report provides confirmation that the draft endorsed components meet the Standards for Training Packages 2012 and the Mapping Summary and Training Package Modification History provides detail on the changes to the training package components. Please see Attachment A: Modification History for Mapping Summary and Training Package Modification History.

H. A COPY OF THE FULL CONTENT OF THE PROPOSED TRAINING PACKAGE COMPONENTS

The draft endorsed fatigue risk management units to be approved under this Case for Endorsement are:

• TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system • TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system • TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system.

The draft endorsed revised qualifications to be approved under this Case for Endorsement are:

• TLI21216 Certificate II in Driving Operations Release 2.0 • TLI31216 Certificate III in Driving Operations Release 2.0 • TLI42016 Certificate IV in Logistics Release 2.0 • TLI42116 Certificate IV in Driving Operations Release 2.0 • TLI50415 Diploma of Logistics Release 3.0.


ATTACHMENT A: MODIFICATION HISTORY The Modification History table is included as an attachment. Reference is made to this information in the Training Package Development and Endorsement Process Policy.

Mapping Summary: Units of Competency

Key: E = equivalent, N = not equivalent, NA = not applicable

Equivalent means the outcomes of old and new units are equivalent.

Components for Endorsement

TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 2.0


Comments E/N/NA

NA TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system

New unit of competency NA

NA TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system


NA TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system


Mapping Summary: Qualification

Key: E = equivalent, N = not equivalent, NA = not applicable

Equivalent means the outcomes of old and new qualifications are equivalent.

Components for Endorsement



Comments E/N/NA

TLI21216 Certificate II in Driving Operations (Release 1.0)

TLI21216 Certificate II in Driving Operations (Release 2.0)

TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system added to general elective units and packaging rules for the elective units clarified

E

TLI31216 Certificate III in Driving Operations (Release 1.0)

TLI31216 Certificate III in Driving Operations (Release 2.0)

TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system added to the general elective units and packaging rules for the elective units clarified

E




Comments E/N/NA

TLI42016 Certificate IV in Logistics (Release 1.0)

TLI42016 Certificate IV in Logistics (Release 2.0)

TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system and TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system added to the general elective units and packaging rules for the elective units clarified

E

TLI42116 Certificate IV in Driving Operations (Release 1.0)

TLI42116 Certificate IV in Driving Operations (Release 2.0)

TLIF0005 Apply a fatigue risk management system and TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system added to the general elective units

E

TLI50415 Diploma of Logistics (Release 2.0)

TLI50415 Diploma of Logistics (Release 3.0)

TLIF0006 Administer a fatigue risk management system and TLIF0007 Manage a fatigue risk management system added to the general elective units

E

Training Package Modification History

Release Number Release Date Comment

3.0 Wednesday, 17 May 2017

This is the third release of this Training Package.

Three new units added to the general elective units in five revised qualifications.

ATTACHMENT B: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

Members of the Transport and Logistics Industry Reference Committee

Representative Organisation

Anne Maric TNT

Bill McKinley Australian Trucking Association


Members of the Fatigue Management Technical Advisory Committee

Bill Murphy Customs Brokers and Forwarders Council of Australia Inc.

Cam Dumesny Western Australia Road Transport Association Inc.

Cathi Payne Payne Haulage

Damien Davies BORAL

David Hine Woolworths Limited

David Rogers Supply Chain and Logistics Association of Australia

Greg Spence DP World Australia

Greg Lipscombe Linfox Logistics

Joe Lopino Australian Furniture Removers Association

Kim Hassall Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport

Lindsay Eisemann Origin Energy

Lynda Douglas Department of Defence

Mark McKenzie ACAPMA

Mark Haley Border Express

Michael Kilgariff Australian Logistics Council

Peter Anderson Victorian Transport Association

Umme Hoque Transport Workers Union of Australia

Warren Smith Maritime Union of Australia


Peter Nemtsas Linfox

Craig Olsson Linfox

Glenn Sharp Defence force

Cathi Payne Payne Haulage

Craig Guthrie Boral


State/Territory Training Authority (STA) contacts

Peter Elliot Australian Logistics Council

Karen Bow NHVR

Andreas Blahous NHVR

Darren Nolan Nolan's Interstate Transport

Bill Law Patrick

Luke Tabone Patrick

Michelle Harwood Transtrain

Umme Hoque TWU

Tony Hopkins National Road Freighters Association

Tony Khoury Waste Contractors & Recyclers Association of NSW

Tony Fenwick PFD Food Services Pty Ltd

Jan Paterson Queensland Trucking Association

Louise Bilato NT Road Transport Association

Rowena Muller Australian Trucking Association

Jeff Merrick J.A.T. Refrigerated Road Services Pty Ltd

Rod Hannifey Truckright

Cam Dumesny Western Australian Road Transport Association (WARTA)

Barry Mitchell Simon National Carriers

Shaun Moloney Simon National Carriers

Mark Webb Simon National Carriers

Ken Brennan Sutton Road Training Centre

Greg Fawcett TAFE QLD South West


Guy Valentine Department of Education, Training and Employment


In addition to the above list, approximately 2,000 VET stakeholders were also contacted, informed about the project and invited to comment on draft units at various stages of the project via AIS targeted email alerts and phone enquiries.

Skills Investment and Market Strategy (QLD)

Liam White Education & Training, ACT Government (ACT)

Lisa Barron

Lucinda Pita

Department of Training and Workforce Development (WA)

Dianne Fong Department of Trade, Business and Innovation (NT)

Marina Borrello Skills SA - Department of State Development

Lee Carter Department of Education and Training (VIC)

Susan Bayly-Stark Skills Tasmania, Department of State Growth

Vera Kostadinovska Department of Industry/State Training Services (NSW)


ATTACHMENT C: QUALITY REPORT

Section 1 – Details of draft Training Package components

INFORMATION REQUIRED DETAIL

Training Package title and code TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package Release 3.0

Number of new or revised qualifications 5 revised qualifications

Number of new or revised units 3 new units

Confirmation that the draft endorsed components meet the Standards for Training Packages 2012

The draft endorsed components meet the Standards for Training Packages 2012.

Name of panel member completing Quality Report Tina Berghella, Oggi Consulting Pty Ltd, Quality Assurance Panel Member.

Statement that the panel member

is independent of development and/or validation activities associated with the Case for Endorsement

has not undertaken the Equity and/or Editorial Report

is independent of the Training Package or Training Package components being reviewed.

Tina Berghella is independent of the Training Package and its components, has not been involved in the development and validation of this Training Package and the Case for Endorsement and has not undertaken the Editorial and Equity Reports.

Date completed 28th February 2017


Section 2 – Compliance with The Standards for Training Packages

Standards for Training Packages Standard met – yes or no

Comments (including any relevant comments from the Equity and Editorial Reports)

Standard 1 Training Packages consist of the following:

1. AISC endorsed components: • units of competency • assessment requirements (associated with each unit

of competency) • qualifications • credit arrangements.

2. One or more quality assured companion volumes.

Yes TLI components for endorsement include 5 qualifications, 3 units of competency and their associated assessment requirements, credit arrangements and one quality assured companion volume.

Standard 2 Training Package developers comply with the AISC Training Package Products Policy.

Yes TLI components for endorsement comply with policy. This is supported by the Equity Report.

Standard 3 Training Package developers comply with the AISC Training Package Development and Endorsement Process Policy.

Yes The processes described in the Case for Endorsement are consistent with policy. This is supported by the Equity Report.

Standard 4 Units of competency specify the standards of performance required in the workplace.

Yes The units clearly specify the standards pf performance required in the workplace.

Standard 5 The structure of units of competency complies with the unit of competency template.

Yes The structure of the TLI units complies with the template. This is supported by the Editorial Report.

Standard 6 Assessment requirements specify the evidence and required conditions for assessment.

Yes The assessment requirements clearly specify the performance and knowledge evidence and the conditions of assessment.


Standard 7 Every unit of competency has associated assessment requirements. The structure of assessment requirements complies with the assessment requirements template.

Yes Each unit has associated assessment requirements and the structure complies with the template. This is supported by the Editorial Report.

Standard 8 Qualifications comply with the Australian Qualifications Framework specification for that qualification type.

Yes The developer’s mapping of the qualifications against the AQF was examined during this review.

Standard 9 The structure of the information for the Australian Qualifications Framework qualification complies with the qualification template.

Yes The structure of the qualifications complies with the template. This is confirmed by the Editorial Report.

Standard 10 Credit arrangements existing between Training Package qualifications and Higher Education qualifications are listed in a format that complies with the credit arrangements template.

Yes These were sighted for all draft qualifications.

At this time, no credit arrangements exist.

Standard 11 A quality assured Companion Volume Implementation Guide produced by the Training Package developer is available at the time of endorsement and complies with the Companion Volume Implementation Guide template.

Yes The companion volume complies with the companion volume implementation guide template.

The quality assurance process is documented within the companion volume implementation guide.

Standard 12 Training Package developers produce other quality assured companion volumes to meet the needs of their stakeholders as required.

Yes No additional companion volumes are included in this submission.


Section 3 – Comments on how the draft Training Package components meet the quality principles

TRAINING PACKAGE QUALITY PRINCIPLES

KEY FEATURES EXAMPLES OF EVIDENCE MET YES/NO

COMMENTS/ OTHER EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATED

Provide brief commentary on how the draft endorsed components meet the Quality Principles with specific reference to the evidence provided, including any evidence provided by the Equity and Editorial Reports

1. Reflect identified workforce outcomes

1. Driven by industry’s needs

• Changes demonstrate a clear link back to relevant AISC decisions commissioning the work, the IRC Skills Forecast and Proposed Schedule of Work, the National Review Schedule and/or Case for Change, or demonstrate other evidence of industry needs

Yes The changes demonstrate a clear link back to the AISC’s request to Australian Industry Standards Limited (AIS) to develop three new units of competency for the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package (Activity Order reference: AISL/TPD/2015 – 16/001). The National Register describes this activity as ‘The Transport and Logistics IRC will oversee the development of three new units in relation to heavy vehicle fatigue management, including industry consultation and validation necessary to prepare a Case for Endorsement outlining the case for change.’ driven by ‘National Heavy Vehicle Regulator accreditation requirements’. The new units have been added to the general elective banks of five existing TLI qualifications that are also included in the submission.

2. Compliant and respond to broad

• Evidence that the training package components respond to Ministers’ policy initiatives, in

Yes The training package components are responsive to Ministers’ policy initiatives, including the move


government policy initiatives

particular the 2015 training package reforms

to the contestable model for the development and maintenance of training packages. This is demonstrated in the Case for Endorsement through adherence to the Training Package Development and Endorsement Process Policy approved by the AISC in November 2016.

TLI is also responsive to other broad VET policy initiatives including an industry-led training system and aligning of training and regulatory requirements.

3. Reflect contemporary work organisation and job profiles incorporating a future orientation

• Open and inclusive consultation and validation commensurate with scope and impact has been conducted

Yes The consultation and validation processes described in the Case for Endorsement reflect the scope and impact of the changes.

Stakeholders consulted included the members of the Transport and Logistics Industry Reference Committee and the members of the Fatigue Management Technical Advisory Committee. Representatives included enterprises, industry associations, unions, regulators, training providers, and state and territory training authorities. A list of stakeholders consulted is provided in the Case for Endorsement.

The case for endorsement notes that approximately 2000 VET stakeholders were contacted via email and phone.

A summary of formal meetings with the Fatigue Management Technical Advisory Committee Representatives is available on the developer’s website. The developer confirmed that they are in


the process of developing an issues register that will be placed on their website.

National communication, consultation and validation mechanisms included a mix of methods commensurate with the complexity of the work. These included face to face, telephone and video-conferencing meetings, IRC initiated communications with their networks, emails and website postings.

2. Support portability of skills and competencies including reflecting licensing and regulatory requirements

4. Support movement of skills within and across organisations and sectors

• Pathways support movement within and across sectors

• Identification of skill sets that respond to client needs

Yes The new units are designed to support movement across the different transport and logistics industry sectors and have been packaged into broad road transport and logistics qualifications.

No skill sets are included with this submission.

5. Promote national and international portability

• Other national and international standards for skills are considered

Yes The new units reflect a national legislative requirement and support portability across Australian jurisdictions.

6. Reflect regulatory requirements and licencing

• Solutions to incorporate licensing and regulatory requirements are brokered and there is clear evidence of support from licensing and industry regulatory bodies

Yes The new units reflect the fatigue management requirements of the Heavy Vehicle National Law (HVNL). The requirements are incorporated into the unit application field, the performance criteria, the performance evidence, the knowledge evidence and the assessment conditions. This is supported by advice provided in the companion volume implementation guide.

The list of stakeholders consulted in the development and validation of the draft


components include representatives from the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) as members of the Fatigue Management Technical Advisory Committee.

3. Reflect national agreement about the core transferable skills and core job-specific skills required for job roles as identified by industry

7. Reflect national consensus

• Active engagement across industry has sought to achieve a national consensus about the advice being provided to the AISC.

Yes The developer confirmed that the NHVR agreed to the new draft components on the 24/032/17 and the Transport and Logistics Industry Reference Committee agreed to the submission of the draft components for endorsement on the 27/02/15.

There are no reports by exception.

8. Recognise convergence and connectivity of skills

• Best use is made of cross-industry and work and participation bank units

Yes The draft components are specific to legislative requirements and therefore cross-industry units are not applicable to this submission.

4. Be flexible to meet the diversity of individual and employer needs, including the capacity to adapt to changing job roles and workplaces

9. Meet the diversity of individual and employer needs

• Provide flexible qualifications that enable application in different contexts

Yes The qualification packaging rules are unchanged. They offer flexibility in the number and choice of electives to meet individual and enterprise needs in a variety of contexts.

10. Support equitable access and progression of learners

• Provide multiple entry and exit points

• Pre-requisite units of competency are used only when required

Yes The qualification pathways are unchanged. Multiple entry and exit points are shown on the qualification pathways charts in the companion volume implementation guide.

Entry into the all revised qualifications is by direct entry.

None of the new units contain prerequisites.


5. Facilitate recognition of an individual’s skills and knowledge and support movement between the school, vocational education and higher education sectors

11. Support learner transition between education sectors

• Provide pathways from entry and preparatory level as appropriate to facilitate movement between schools and VET, from entry level into work, and between VET and higher education qualifications

Yes The qualification pathways are unchanged. The qualification pathways charts in the companion volume implementation guide show progression from school through to Advanced Diploma.

Pathways between VET and higher education do not appear in the credit arrangements template as there are no national arrangements.

6. Support interpretation by training providers and others through the use of simple, concise language and clear articulation of assessment requirements

12. Support implementation across a range of settings

• Industry advice about delivery is provided via a Companion Volume Implementation Guide ready for publication at the same time as the Training Package

Yes The companion volume implementation guide was sighted as part of this review and checked against the mandatory requirements of the template. It has had a minor update reflecting the small size of this activity.

13. Support sound assessment practice

• Units of competency and their associated assessment requirements are clearly written and have consistent breadth and depth

Yes The units and associated assessment requirements are clearly written with consistent breadth and depth. The content is logically sequenced and there are clear links between each unit and its associated assessment requirements. This is supported by the Equity Report.

14. Support implementation

• Compliance with the TGA/National Register requirements for publication

Yes The draft components are consistent with the required templates. This is supported by the Editorial Report.


• Implementation advice is provided in a Companion Volume Implementation Guide that is ready for publication at the same time as the Training Package

The developer has advised that the updated companion volume implementation guide will be available at the same time as the Training Package.

fatigue management case for endorsement final documents/fatigue...• tlif2010 apply fatigue...

Documents