family connections the leading noble families of the late ayutthaya period— the persian bunnags,...
TRANSCRIPT
Family connections
• The leading noble families of the late Ayutthaya period—
• The Persian Bunnags,
• The Brahman
• The Chinese, i.e., Krairuks,
The Chakri
• By 1775, the Chakri (Thong Duang) and brother(Bunma) were related to all three.
• The Chakri’s chief wife was closely related to the Bunnags;
• Through his elder sister’s husband he was related to the Brahman line; through one of his concubines, he was connected to the Chinese line.
Wars and conquest
• 1775 conquest of Lan Na
• 1778 conquest of Vientiane– Took the Emerald Buddha and Phrabang back
to Thonburi.
• Suzerainty over Champassak and Vientiene and cowed Luang Prabang unequal alliance with Siam.
Crisis and revolt in Thonburi
• 1779 Taksin devoted to religious excesses.
• Provoking schism in Buddhism, required the monks to recognize him as a sotapanna, “or stream-winner”
• The loss of merit and right, by merit, to rule.
• “paranoid” behavior because he was an outsider; his roots were shallow.
• Taksin had alienated the old power structure of the capital, the monks, old families, officials, and the merchants.
• Power remained in the hands of local ruling families, the noble families, forming many cliques and factions and control of manpower.
• By the end of 1781 some consensus within the elite that Taksin had to be replaced—for the good of all, for the fate of Buddhism, for the future of Siam.
• Sent Chakri and Surasi to pacify Cambodia.• A revolt in the capital and call for the
Chakri to be king. Marched back on April 6, 1782.
Royal execution
• According to the Palatine Law
• Taksin is said to have met his end tied up in a velvet sack and struck on the back of the neck with a sandalwood club, later to be secretly buried in the outskirts of Thonburi.
• Folk tradition was that he was taken away to Nakhon si Thammarat.
The Bangkok Kingdom• ‘new Siamese vision’
• 1:The “new self” perception. – humanism in Buddhism, “rationalism”, .
Paticcasamuppada, the doctrine of dependent co-arising
• 2: The “New Order” – a new moral order=The new Ecclesiastical laws
(Kotmai phra song) 1782-1801. – Rewrite “Traiphum”-1783: Tipitaka in 1788.
• Rethinking; interpretation of the canon & text.
– reminds monks of the rules – reverse the order of man and the world in Traiphum– Old Traiphum--less virtue up to the highest– New Traiphum--man first, then lower orders--higher
orders. Man in the middle of the order.– ‘world of men and kings’. Theme=king is the leader– The Three Seals Laws. 1805– relate all law to a single absolute standard of justice
• 3: The “New World”• Recognized the world and its calamities• Translation of foreign literature and texts• ‘Ramayana’.(1796-7). ‘Rachathirat’• ‘Dalang’ and ‘Inao’ from Java; from Persia• ‘Unarut’, from ‘Mahabharata’• ‘Mahavamsa’ and ‘Jinakalamali’ from Pali• ‘The Romance of the Three Kingdoms’-Chinese• Mainly from Mon, Chinese and Persian literatures
• Universalization of values.
The Rewriting of History
• . Explaining the cause of the fall of Ayudhya. Baan Plu Luang(1688-1767).> The royal chronicle of Ayudhya
• New hybrid of Bangkok style of art and architecture. Early Bangkok pro Chinese, by the middle period pro Western style.
• “change in focus that brought rational man clearly to the center of the stage of history”.
The New Empire
• Large number of power centers existed:• First circle of semi-independent
rulers=Kedah, Trengganu, Kelantan, Cambodia, and Luang Prabang.
• A second tier of principalities, provided manpower, tribute, married in and interfered; Chiangmai, Vientiane, Champassak, and Patani.
• The next layer consisted of large regional centers around Siam’s periphery, ruled by chaophraya, as quasi-independent provinces. Songkhla, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Battambong-Siem Reap, and Nakhon Ratchasima.
• A fourth tier was in Khorat Plateau.