fall state 2011 agenda

8/2/2019 Fall State 2011 Agenda

1/36

1


2/36

2

Table of Contents

Messages from Cabinet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4

Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-20

Keynote Speaker Biographies . . . . . . 21-23

Fundraising, Publicity, Activism . . . . 24-25

Civic Engagement Fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-26

Midwest JSA Calendar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

Debate Feedback Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

JSA Summer School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29-30

Convention Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32-34

Dining Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

Skeleton Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36


3/36

3

Junior Statesmen and Stateswomen,I hope all of you are as excited as I am to be back in Madison for Fall State 2011! For me, Fall State

has always represented what JSA truly is, and the potential it holds. Every second of this weekend, all of

you are engaging in active citizenship. You will argue our countrys most dire issues and you have the power

to answer the hard questions. And you make your voice heard at every step of the way.

Therefore, I urge all of you to take a step forward and truly be involved during this convention in as

many ways as possible. Ask a question during to the Keynote Speaker, speak with the multiple

organizations we have represented here at the Activism Fair, question views and ideas you oppose, but,

most importantly, throughout the weekend, be able to question yourself. We all gather here today to not

just argue ignorantly, but to learn from others and keep an open mind as we, together, will take on the

challenges of the future. Our theme for this years Fall State is the Power Paradigm: Our Role in the

Changing World. And if, from this weekend, you are one step closer to knowing your role in our world, no

matter what that role maybe, I would call this convention a success.

The weekend that lies in front of us all poses a unique opportunity to make your opinions into

reality, so make your opinion heard, and watch democracy unfold before your own eyes.

Have a fantastic and enjoyable weekend!

Neshal Patel

Midwest JSA Lieutenant Governor

Midwest Junior State,

I cant even begin to explain how excited I am to kick off Fall State 2011. Were back in Madison,

and as you could probably tell from looking outside, the city is exciting as ever; as we speak, tens of

thousands of Wisconsin citizens gather outside the Capitol building, concerned with the future of their

state, and vowing to Be the People.

The state of Wisconsin is merely one example of the shifting power paradigm that were witnessing

all around us. The world is in flux; with China in a housing bubble, the European Union in panic, and Brazil,

India, and several other countries in prosperity, America faces a myriad of monumental decisions. As our

economy barely recovers under the looming shadow of a double-dip recession, we must reevaluate our

foreign policy and reconsider our role in the global arena. An election is right around the corner; we as

citizens must decide where our country should go from here.

Midwest Cabinet has tried its hardest to make sure that theres a debate for each of you, so I

encourage you to put yourself in the mix at this convention, whether thats giving a great speech, asking

the perfect question, or just absorbing what you hear. With engaging debates, enthralling speakers, and an

electrifying atmosphere, this Fall State will undoubtedly be unforgettable.

What is Americas role in this changing world? You, the Midwest Junior State, will decide.

Yours Truly,

Aadi Tolappa

Midwest JSA Governor

Message from Governor Aadi Tolappa

Message from Lieutenant Governor Nesh Patel

Messages from Midwest JSA Cabinet


4/36

4

Dear Delegates,

I am thrilled to welcome you all to Fall State 2011! Prepare to face challenges that will stimulate

your intellect, broaden your mindset, and test your fundamental beliefs. Even more importantly, I urge you

to take leaps and bounds out of your comfort zone this weekend and forge new friendships that will trulymake your experience here unforgettable.

Over this past year, we have had the incredible opportunity to witness history in the making. We

have beheld the tremors of both the global economy and a cataclysmic Japanese tsunami, viewed age old

dictatorships topple and fall in the Middle East, lived to welcome the birth of the worlds 7 billionth child,

and commemorated the end of a decade of grief upon the death of Osama bin Laden. As we sit here in the

heart of Madison, revolutionary forces brew around us on the very steps of this building. Pivotal issues like

these and many others will be explored throughout the course of this convention. Thus, in accordance with

this years theme, I challenge you to take an active role in our changing world and immerse yourself in all

that Fall State has to offer.

As we gather together today, the message of JSA is resonant in my own heart and, I hope, in yoursas well. If you only accept the opportunity, I promise this convention will be an experience like no other.

Together we can guarantee that Fall State 2011 will be nothing short of spectacular.

Always Yours,

Kimberly Liu

Midwest JSA Convention Coordinator

Message from Convention Coordinator Kimberly Liu

The Midwest Junior State of America

Fall State 2011

`

Opening Remarks Governor Aadi Tolappa

Lieutenant Governor Nesh Patel

Convention Coordinator Kimberly Liu

Opening Session | 10:00 - 11:00 Capitol BuildingAssembly Chamber

Registration | 8:00 - 9:45 Madison Concourse Hotel

Senate A and Senate B

Saturday, November 19


5/36

5

Convention Rules Lindsey Bowen, Program Director

Keynote Speaker Mark F. Miller, Wisconsin State Senator

Moderating Workshop:

All moderators and new JSAers are strongly encouraged to attend.

Led by: Karthik Bala, Stanley Yuan Room 300 NW

Debate Workshop:

All speakers and new JSAers are strongly encouraged to attend.

Led by: Edeline Chen, Kimberly Liu Room 328 NW

Council of Chapter Presidents & Teacher Advisor Meeting

Mandatory meeting for all Chapter Presidents and Teacher Advisors.Led By: Praneeth Tripuraneni, Gayatri Sanku, Nesh Patel Parlor

Debate:Resolved, that the United States promote the idea of evaluating temporary

members of the United Nations Security Council for the possibility of permanent voting

membership.

Many are of the opinion that the current United Nations Security Council is an antique of the

World War II era, when its permanent membership was decided. They argue that the

dynamics of international power have shifted significantly over the past 66 years since the

council was formed, and that something should be done to account for that significant

change. As a leading world power, it falls to the responsibility of the United States to take astance on the future of the Security Council. Many temporary members, which include

Germany and India, are just as powerful and influential as the nations on the Security Council

and therefore might deserve equal representation. Others argue that expanding the number

of permanent voting nations on the Security Council could reduce productivity due to the

significance of the veto power, among other negative consequences. The composition of the

United Nations Security Council is of great international importance, so it is essential that the

United States take a stance on this debate that acts in the best interest of its citizens, and the

citizens of the world.

Pro: Luke Dawson, Marian Central Catholic

Con: Will Donnelly, Naperville North

Moderator: Carly Naughton, Neuqua Valley Room 225 NW

Debate:Resolved, that Social Security be privatized.

With the United States in a terrible fiscal emergency, many are looking for ways to help get

the economy back on track and to cut spending. One such government program that is often

talked about in regards to spending and the economy is Social Security, and many

conservatives want to privatize the program as a means to stabilize Social Security and cut

Block I | 11:05 - 11:50 Capitol Building


6/36

6

government spending. Supporters of privatization argue that privatization would allow for

the payments to be passed on from one generation to the next, spending could be cut, and

Chile, with one of the most economically sound countries in the world also has a system

similar to privatized Social Security. Others argue that privatization would make Social

Security subject to fluctuations in the stock market and bond market, which could adversely

affect it, and that spending will not actually be cut because the government will have to fundthe private accounts, which would result in more spending.

Pro: Varun Chethan, Skyline

Con: Matteo Alleman, Naperville North

Moderator: Hari Ravi, Neuqua Valley Room 400 NW

Thought Talk: Should the U.S. actively support individuals engaged in protest against their

governments?

Beginning in the spring of 2011 with the string of protests in the Middle East (more commonly

known as Arab Spring), there have been in a rise in mass movements, social, political, or

humanitarian. There have been changes in head of state in Egypt, the creation of new

countries in South Sudan, changes in policies in India, and many more world changing events.

The U.S. has been put into a position in which they have to take sides in the conflicts. Some

people say that the United States should stand by other heads of state instead of condoning

movements such as these. Others say that the U.S. should stand by the values it so proudly

proclaims and support protestors in their fights against theirstates.

Moderator: Nic Wolf, Naperville North Room 415NW

Debate:Resolved, that teacher unions are detrimental to the American education system.Since their establishment, teacher unions have been a forceful contender in the shaping of

American education. In fact, Fortune magazine has consistently ranked the National Education

Association in the top 15 of its Washington Power list due to its influence in the capitol. In

nearly every state, teachers dues are automatically diverted to their unions political funds.

These funds are then siphoned to finance campaign distributions, ballot initiatives, and

lobbying expenditures, often to combat proposed education reform. Critics of the

organizations assert that the activities of teacher unions ultimately detract from the

educational system, lowering its quality while increasing its cost. Yet unions are founded upon

and perpetuate the principle of social justice. They work tirelessly to give teachers a voice as

forceful as that of their role in the lives of Americas youth. Supporters maintain that theimproved pay and other benefits that unions achieve incentivize the occupation, encouraging

more talent to enter the field while increasing teachers motivation to work. Do unions

contribute to the American education system through improvement of teaching conditions or

provide teacher benefits at its expense?

Pro: Jackie Qiu, Skyline

Con: Ben Carlson, Naperville North

Moderator: Maya Gianchandani, Skyline Room 415NW

Block II | 11:55 - 12:45 Capitol Building


7/36

7

Debate:Resolved, that the United States no longer subsidize petroleum companies, and

instead devote those resources to alternative energy grants and hybrid and electric car

subsidies.

In a time when the Earths petroleum resources are being depleted at a staggering rate and

petro-chemical firms are turning significant profits, many call for the US government to pull its

many subsidies from the industry and focus instead on the future. By investing that money inthe development of alternative energy technology as well as more resource-efficient vehicles,

the US could position itself to succeed in an uncertain energy future without further straining

an overburdened budget. Others believe that removing these subsidies would be felt by

Americans at the gas pump and that doing so would be dangerous in a time of such economic

volatility. Whether or not to proceed with moving these subsidies from the vital petroleum

industry to an investment for the future of energy in America is a key decision that should be

thought over with care.

Pro: Rohit Rastogi, Naperville North

Con: Lisa Swanson, Naperville Central

Moderator: Glen Richardson, IMSA Room 328 NW

Debate:Resolved, that the U.S. should respect international desires over national interests

as dependence on foreign powers increases.

In todays globalized world, America has become increasingly dependent upon other countries

for oil, manufacturing, raw materials, and other resources. The federal government borrows

massive amounts of money every year, and international trade is quickly becoming the most

important aspect of American business. Some experts believe that as America depends more

and more upon other countries, we should hold foreign interests in higher priority than

domestic issues. Others contend that this is not the case, and that economic interdependence

is not a reason to compromise policy at home.

Pro: Kevin Zhang, IMSACon: Karthik Bala, Naperville North

Moderator: Pooja Saxena, Neuqua Valley Room 300 NW

Debate:Resolved, that America increase quotas on skilled worker visas.

The American economy is an advanced economy - it is primarily service based and relies

heavily on knowledge industries such as technology and education. Such an economy is fueled

by a workforce educated in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics).

American multinationals have fed their growing demand for STEM educated workers by hiring

immigrants by granting them an H1-B visa. The H1-B visa is a skilled worker visa that requires

the recipient hold a minimum of a bachelors degree and the visa can only be granted if there

are no citizens who can reasonably occupy the job. Under the directive of President Obama,the TARP bill included restrictions on the use of H1-B visas for companies that received TARP

money, and these restrictions were again extended with the ARRA bill. Opponents frequently

cite the abuse the H1-B system encounters - although workers may be brought in under the

premise they are performing skilled labor, many are actually unskilled and processed through

the H1-B program to speed their entry into the US. Additionally, only companies can sponsor

H1-B visas, making the employees dependent on their employers; some draw parallels


8/36

8

between their situation and those of indentured servants. Supporters note that without the

visa, the United States would lose its competitive advantage of attracting the worlds smartestworkers to its companies. In addition, supporters note that the H1-B visa allow many foreigners to

enter the United States with employment and a stable path to permanent residency, the first steps

towards the American Dream.

Pro: Shantanu Jain, IMSACon: JohnPatrick OHagan, Marian Central Catholic

Moderator: Timothe Smith, Naperville North Room 225 NW

Debate:Resolved, that the United States take a stance against media and social media

censorship that countries such as China and North Korea use to limit their citizens access to

information.

Many believe that Communist Regimes in countries such as North Korea go too far in their

policies of media and social media censorship, and that pressure should be applied to achieve

freedom of information in these countries. They argue that it behooves the United States to

stand with this effort in order to both further its humanitarian objectives and further open up

these countries to American businesses. For example, tension between the Chinesegovernment and Google has resulted in the frustrated corporation effectively making its

services unavailable to the Chinese mainland, cutting off Google from an internet search

consumer base that is growing by 40% every year as well as making information less available

to Chinese citizens. Others, however, argue that by taking a stance on this issue the United

States would overstep its bounds and potentially interfere with the sovereignty of other

nations, not to mention the likely diplomatic consequences. The outcome of these, and other

key arguments, will decide whether or not the United States should demand: Mr. Jiabao, tear

down this firewall!

Pro: Kajol Char, Neuqua Valley

Con: Jeremy Still, Vernon HillsModerator: Caroline Brunson, Springfield Room 400 NW

Keynote Speaker:

Jeff Burkhart, Madison Literacy Network Assembly Chamber

Block III | 2:10 - 2:55 Capitol Building

Lunch | 12:50 - 2:05


9/36

9

Civic Engagement Fair North Hearing Room

Thought Talk: Does the country you are born in matter to your success?Immigrants from all over the world come to America, the land of opportunity, in pursuit of

a better life. However, as the world becomes increasingly globalized, the traditional view of

the Western world holding more economic opportunities is being challenged. In addition,

success has a variety of definitions, as few would dispute the success of influential advocates

for change such as Mother Teresa or Gandhi. Nonetheless, for those who live in oppressed

nations, race and background play a large role in the opportunities that present themselves.

Many countries that are engaged in war have corrupt governments that simply cannot

provide its citizens with the adequate education and opportunities necessary to succeed. So,

does the country you are born in matter to your success? Or does it depend on what type of

person you are?

Moderator: Adam Burshan, Naperville North Room 300 NW

Thought Talk: From what sources does a government derive its power?

As the Arab Spring continues to captivate the attention of the world, as governments rise and

fall in the blink of an eye, this question seems omnipresent, furtively seeking a resolution

amidst the turmoil of the Middle East. While the common perception seems to be that

government derives its power from the people, is this really the case? Dictators who ruled

with an iron fist for generations have been forced to relinquish their grasp in the face of the

very military force they exercised to gain power in the first place. Military rule then gave way

to armed rebels, who in turn attribute their power to God. At the very heart of this chaos,

where does the power of a government truly lie?Moderator: Lauren Moore, Marian Central Catholic Room 328 NW

Debate:Resolved, that the increased polarization of political parties accurately reflects the

ideologies of their constituents.

In a system where politicians have consistently taken moderate positions or flip-flopped on

their own party principles in order to maximize their votes, it seems that parties have

become more polarized than everRepublicans use the Democrats policies against them,

and vice versa, and leaders adhere closer and closer to strict party lines, widening the once

small gap between the two groups. Some say that this ongoing change is simply a reflection

of the peoples ideals, as it should be in a democracy, while others claim that radical party

leaders are simply demonstrating exaggerated sides of each issue, and that the averageAmerican voter is a moderate blend of these influences.

Pro: Kyle Glasper, IMSA

Con: Eric Price, Naperville North

Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Room 225 NW

Block IV | 3:00 - 3:50 Capitol Building


10/36

10

Debate:Resolved, that America is still the land of opportunity.

America has undisputedly been the land of opportunity in its past. Considering the sizeable

influx of immigrants during the early nineteenth (and even later during the early twentieth)

century and their subsequent assimilation into society, America has surely given

opportunities to incoming foreigners. America has always touted social mobility and

economic freedom as two of its greatest aspects, both of which are embodied by the

idealized, land-of-opportunity America which forever captures admiration. But, has this spirit

of economic and social freedom persisted? Many would claim that the America in which we

live has neither of these traits, and is in fact becoming less free market and more sociallystatic than it has been in the past. Conversely, Americas continuation of practices like

reverse discrimination shows that it is inciting social mobility.

Pro: Lucy Mui, Naperville Central

Con: James Chen, IMSA

Moderator: Nivetha Samy, Skyline University Room C

Debate:Resolved, U.S. law enforcement be involved in investigating potential violations of

NCAA bylaws by college athletes, coaches, and institutions.

The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) is the governing body for Division I, II,

and III college sports. They have set rules down to protect the amateurism of the athletes.

These rules range from prohibiting payments to the players beyond their scholarships towhat kind of competitions they can participate in to even whether or not they can have

cream cheese on pre-meal bagels (this rule was repealed during summer 2011, but still an

interesting rule nonetheless). There are 33 programs that are currently serving a period of

probation imposed by the NCAA. Since the NCAA created its rulebook in 1955, 31 college

programs have been found guilty of committing at least 5 major violations. In the past 5

years, the NCAA has had to deal with multiple violations by different schools in a short span

of time. Because of this, the NCAA has taken a long time to hand out sanctions to the guilty

parties and the repercussions of the violations often has to be felt by groups of people who

have absolutely nothing to do with the violations or even the team during the time period

they committed the violations. A proposed solution is to hire law enforcement agencies toexpedite the process of investigating. Opponents of this claim that the government has

better things to do than investigate rules violations by college athletes. Others claim that

since college sports are such a big money business, government regulation is a necessary

measure to ensure that all the rules of the business are followed.

Pro: Varun Chethan, Skyline

Con: Jack Carbonara, Naperville North

Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Assembly Room

Block V | 5:10 - 6:00 Madison Concourse Hotel

Chapter Caucus & Key Distribution |4:35 - 5:05 Madison Concourse Hotel

Senate A and Senate B


11/36

11

Debate: Resolved, that it was in the best interest of the United States to cut off financial aid

to Pakistan.

The death of Osama Bin Laden in May of 2011 was a pivotal point in the war on terror. The United

States and its allies finally succeeded in killing the 9/11 mastermind and head of Al Qaeda. However,

his death resulted in the U.S. looking at its Middle East policy differently, especially in regards to

Pakistan. Osama Bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan near a major military academy there. Not onlythat, but the compound he was residing in was very large and out in the open. After learning of this,

many called for the United States to stop sending financial aid to Pakistan. Pakistan, they argued,

should have known Osama Bin Laden was hiding in a massive compound near a major military

academy, and it seems as if they harbored him. Others argue that Pakistan is playing a major role in

fighting terror, and without the financial aid of the U.S., their ability to combat terrorism will be

affected, which will only harm the United States and its Allies

Pro: Gayatri Sanku, Naperville Central

Con: Praneeth Tripuraneni, Naperville North

Moderator: Hari Ravi, Neuqua Valley University Room D

Debate:Resolved, that the internet is the most important form of infrastructure.

As the twenty-first century progresses, the importance of the internet is growing at an

unbelievable rate. Its potential and accessibility make it one of the most important

innovations of the past few decades, as it has become an information highway upon which

hundreds of millions of users connect and communicate. But has this new, exciting form of

infrastructure outgrown the importance of actual highways, airports, and even apartment

complexes? Railroad conductors would maintain that the internet pales in comparison to the

constant, flowing network of resources across the nations rail system, and the same could be

asserted by nearly any profession dealing in transportation, housing, or food.

Pro: Yasha Mostofi, Naperville North

Con: Zach Gold, Naperville North

Moderator: Timothe Smith, Naperville North University Room A

Thought Talk: How should the government define marriage?

Marriage is historically acknowledged as a social institution recognizing the decision between

a man and woman to live as husband and wife. In todays society, marriage can also be

possible for partners of the same gender. Should a government definition of marriage be

based on traditional views or be altered based on societal shifts? Should states still be able to

enforce marriage laws differing from those of federally defined marriage? How will the

separation of church and state be applied in marriage, which can be considered both a legal

and religious institution?

Moderator: Casey Doherty, Marian Central Catholic University Room B

Dinner |6:00 - 8:00


12/36

12

Debate:Resolved, that the government financially assist companies that are scientifically

and technologically innovative.

Two schools of thought persist. One maintains that no, the government should not beinvolved whatsoever in the affairs of the economy, and it should especially not favor one

company over another. The other argument lies in the belief that yes, the government should

assist a company that maintains a certain degree of scientific and technological innovation

that as of yet is not advantageous in the free market, and so requires financial assistance.

Should the government help out the little guy? Some would argue that the responsibility of

market success lies entirely in the hands of the company, and not in financial assistance. But

would financial assistance stimulate growth in Americas much-neglected fields of science

and technology? Would financial assistance be enough to propel weaker, bright-eyed

companies beyond the competition of their larger-budgeted, big-business, less-efficient

counterparts? Is it ethical?Pro: Lisa Liu, Skyline

Con: Naren Akurati, Vernon Hills

Moderator: Stanley Yuan, IMSA Assembly Room

Debate: Resolved, that higher sales taxes imposed on proscribed goods such as alcohol,

tobacco products, and unhealthy foods infringe upon the rights of consumers.

Sin taxes sales taxes placed upon goods or services that could be considered harmful to

the consumer in the United States are levied by state and federal governments, and have

been used as a means of protecting the people since the extra taxation of cigarettes during

the Civil War. Sin taxes are ostensibly used to reduce the consumption of these harmful

products by making them more expensive, thereby giving the consumer a reason to refrainfrom purchasing them. However, many argue that these taxes interfere with a citizens

individual right to control his or her own body. Still others claim that excessive taxation of

certain goods or services leads to black market activity and smuggling within or between

jurisdictions.

Pro: Carly Naughton, Neuqua Valley

Con: Nathan Geldner, IMSA

Moderator: Glen Richardson, IMSA University Room A

Debate: Resolved, that with the death of Osama Bin Laden, the U.S. should immediately

withdraw all military troops from Afghanistan.

On September 11, 2001, members of the Al Qaeda terrorist group hijacked four passenger

planes and intentionally crashed them into the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon. In

retaliation, America initiated a war on terror that culminated on May 2nd, 2011 in the death

of the groups leader, Osama bin Laden. After ten long years of war in Afghanistan, a team of

United States Navy Seals stormed the mansion where bin Laden was hiding and shot him

dead. Now that our initial purpose has been complete, both the majority of Americans and

the majority of Afghans support the immediate withdrawal of all troops. Last June, in a

Block VI | 8:15 - 9:05 Madison Concourse Hotel


13/36

13

televised speech to the nation, President Obama set a timeline for the removal of troops by

2014. However, some feel that this will not enact the immediate change necessary for our

country.

Pro: Ryan Chiu, IMSA

Con: Jack Zinnen, Springfield

Moderator: Max Glas, Naperville Central University Room C

Debate: Resolved, that because NATO is useless, it should be dissolved.

The NATO alliance (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) was an organization founded to

formalize relations between the major European and American powers - the traditionally

western countries. Since its formation in the mid 20th century, its goal has evolved from

"*keeping+ the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down, as stated by the first

Secretary General, to enforcing the plans for a no fly zone over Libya. Critics of the

organization note that NATO nations constitute 70% of all defense spending, and thus nearly

monopolize military power. Supporters note that it allows for fast and organized action

because of its codes that require member nations to provide dedicated troops to the

organization.

Pro: Kyle Glasper, IMSA

Con: Will Donnelly, Naperville North

Moderator: Adam Burshan, Naperville North University Room B

Thought Talk: Hipsters

Moderator: Name, School University Room D

Debate: Resolved, that America could defeat any single nation without the support of its

allies.

Many people theorize that the United States has enough military power to single handedly

defeat any nation in the world. They believe that the US can achieve its interests without the

assistance of the UN, NATO, or any other alliance the US is a part of. Conversely, there are

those that believe that the U.S. draws its power from the trust its allies have in its judgment,

as well as the alliances that give the US influence in places they would not reach without

these alliances. Does the US actually require these alliances to maintain its influence in the

world and protect its interests abroad? Or are can they go rogue and do it all on their own?

Pro: Kevin Zhang, IMSA

Con: Shubham Patel, Vernon Hills

Moderator: Timothe Smith, Naperville North University Room A

Debate: Resolved, that the U.S. should annex Canada.

Since the American Revolution, Americans have looked towards Canada as a possible nation

to annex. The War of 1812 shattered this hope, but with the United States as the world's

dominant superpower, Canada has once again become a possible nation for

Night Activities I | 9:10 - 10:00 Madison Concourse Hotel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Unionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union


14/36

14

annexation. Supporters of annexation argue that should the U.S. take Canada, the United

States would gain vast amounts of land, people, and natural resources, including oil. Further,

they argue that Canada has an incredibly small military, and the United States should be able

to take it with very minimal casualties. Opponents argue that annexing Canada would violate

the Treaty of Ghent that ended the War of 1812 and that annexation would make the United

States more hated in the world. They also argue that annexation would result in massiveriots in Canada that could spill into the United States. Not just any riots, but Canadian hockey

riots.

Pro: Shaker Samman, Port Huron

Con:JohnPatrick OHagan, Marian Central Catholic

Moderator: Lauren Moore, Marian Central Catholic University Room B

Debate: Resolved, that the lax bro subculture is detrimental to society.

Lax bros are bros (two or more males who experience a strong sense of friendship and

camaraderie) who play lacrosse. They crush cans of Natty Ice on their rock hard abs, and

brochill all day long. Some lax bros attend prep school. Other lax bros take the lax aspect

very seriously, training year-round to perfect their games. Lax bros are also known for getting

chicks and partying hard. Some believe that these lax bros are degenerates who are bringing

society to a new low, while others appreciate their chill demeanor and athletic ability. The lax

bros? They just wanna lax, bro.

Pro: Kevin Chong, IMSA

Con: Aaron Geldner, IMSA

Moderator: Anthony Intini, Naperville North University Room C

Debate: Resolved, that the Harry Potter series promotes witchcraft among children

With the eighth and final Harry Potter installment approaching sales of over one billion

dollars since its premier, countless youths have expressed their sorrow over the end of theirchildhood. The story of the boy wizard who defeated the evil Lord Voldemort has

undoubtedly influenced and inspired millions of children, teenagers, and even adults, across

the world. However, opponents of the books believe that this influence has gone too far. An

unreasonable number of children have woken up on their eleventh birthday, devastated to

find that no letter of acceptance from Hogwarts awaited them. Thousands of wands have

been sold to young wizard wannabes who wish that they could learn and perform magic

themselves. To many parents, the spells, potions, and crystal ball readings in JK Rowlings

bestselling selling novels challenge their religious beliefs. Do the Harry Potter series promote

unrealistic ideas to the worlds youth?

Pro: Roy Fu, Naperville North

Con: Neil Bingham, Marian Central CatholicModerator: Eileen Ennis, Marian Central Catholic University Room D

Impromptu Speaking

Led By: Karthik Bala, Naperville North Assembly Room


15/36

15

Dance CapitolBallroom

Quiz Bowl Wisconsin Ballroom

Debate: Resolved, that Americas economy will still be the worlds most important at the

end of the 21st

century.

The rapid rise of the BRIC (Brazil, India, Russia, and China) economies have many economists

and historians speculating that relative to the rest of the world, the American economy will

decline in relative size and influence. The absolute size of an economy, one side says,

determines a countrys influence, as a larger economy is able to interconnect more people

across borders with more resources and businesses. They cite the example of small affluent

countries, such as Luxemburg. The opposing side states that even if the Chinese and Indian

economies were to surpass the United States economy in terms of GDP (output), the United

States economys high level of innovation would continue to maintain its influence citing

the examples of Japan and South Korea.

Pro: Jeffrey Zhao, IMSA

Con: Riley Helm, IMSA


Debate: Resolved, that students have the majority of the responsibility in their education.Many, in the American tradition of the self-made man, emphasize the need for individual

student responsibility. Students need to take individual ownership for their actions and work

hard in their studies. Attempts to shift responsibility from student to the educational system

itself result in failures such as programs like No Child Left Behind, wasting the efforts of

teachers on students without the drive necessary to achieve and preventing promising

students from receiving educational guidance from their already over-burdened teachers. On

the other hand, practically all modern nations enforce a compulsory educational system,

Block VII | 10:15 11:05 Capitol Building

Checkout & Breakfast | 8:00 - 10:00

Sunday, November 20

Curfew |12:15

Night Activities II |10:00 - 12:00 Madison Concourse Hotel


16/36

16

which takes at its premise that students, regardless of ability or interest, must complete a

minimum number of years in schooling. In this sense education is not only for personal

enhancement (both intellectually and in employability,) but a national interest. This being the

case, can (K-12) educational success be primarily put upon the student who may be present

at school only because it is mandatory?

Pro: Satya Yerrabolu, IMSACon: Anthony Intini, Naperville North

Moderator: Eileen Ennis, Marian Central Catholic Room 328 NW

Debate:Resolved, that a democratically elected leader is responsible for representing the

religion of his or her constituents.

As we all know, a democratically elected leader is someone who is elected because they have

the support of the majority of people in a given election. In many cases, this leader

represents a diverse group of constituents. One of the diverse factors is religion. While in a

perfect democratic model, religion would not play a role in the election of candidates to

office. However, in the humanely possible democratic society, religion inherently plays a role

in election based on basic human tendencies to form prejudices. So the question is, does an

elected leader have a responsibility to represent the religion his their constituents? Some

people argue that one of the basic principles that this country was founded upon, separation

of church and state, would prohibit such a representation from happening. Others say that

since religion plays such an important role in todays world that we would have to

incorporate religion into how we manage the country.

Pro: Lisa Swanson, Naperville Central

Con: Kendell Byrd, IMSA

Moderator: Gayatri Sanku, Naperville Central Room 400 NW

Debate: Resolved, that the U.S. has the obligation to promote democracy in the MiddleEast.

The "Arab Spring" in the Middle East has resulted in countless numbers of people dead and

the oppression of many others. These revolutions are largely democratic ones, and most

seek to overthrow a corrupt ruler. The revolutions have given many people a voice, but the

governments in these nations are still powerful and can still crush revolutions and stifle the

will of the people. Many argue that the United States, as the most powerful democratic

nation in the world, is obliged to promote more democracies in the world. Further,

supporters argue that these revolutions could help the United States in the War on Terror

and topple rulers who are enemies of the U.S. Opponents argue that the United States has

no right to tell a country what government it should have, and that these revolutions open

the possibility of Muslim Extremists taking over the country and turning it into a terroristnation.

Pro: Steven Tinetti, Vernon Hills

Con: Anushka Mehrotra, Neuqua Valley

Moderator: Rishika Ramireddy, Skyline Room 225 NW

Thought Talk: Macs vs. PCs

Moderator: Adam Burshan, Naperville North Room 415 NW


17/36

17

Resolved, that all American airports undergo IsraelificationIn 2010, the TSA revealed plans to purchase and install at least 500 full body scanners in major

airports across the country, each costing approximately $170,000. Currently, only 68 out of the5,000 public-use airports in the country have these scanners, rendering them ineffective

because terrorists can attack flights originating from the airports that do not have scanners

installed. Although the United States spends $15 billion each year on airport security, it fails to

conduct intelligence and threat analyses based on the monitoring of suspicious behavior. The

ineffective American system contrasts with the Israeli method, most prominently used at Tel

Avivs Ben Gurion International Airport. The airports security has yet to be breached, despite

facing dozens of potential terrorist threats each day in one of the worlds most targeted

countries. Their setup consists of a six-step process focused heavily on psychological scrutiny

and allows passengers to arrive at their flight in less than twenty-five minutes, as opposed to

the three or more hours an American must spend. Should America abolish its TSA scannersand adopt the Israeli method?

Pro: Summer Wu, IMSA

Con: Nivetha Samy, Skyline

Moderator: Lauren Moore, Marian Central Catholic Room 328 NW

Debate: Resolved, that the American economic system inherently fosters class conflict.

While the poor and working class bear the pain of the recession, the rich and powerful fiercely

fight against any proposal that includes a tax raise on the wealthy. Due to the incredibly

expensive nature of running electoral campaigns, it is often difficult for blue collar workers to

find a political voice. For example, the mid-term elections cost an estimated $4.5 billion, with

most of the contributions coming from big corporations and rich contributors. As oureconomic system is so closely connected to and relies on the political system, many argue that

it inherently fosters class conflict. However, America is also known as the land of opportunity

because of its history of providing everybody, no matter which class they originate from, the

chance to strike it big.

Pro: Connor Sundberg, Marian Central Catholic

Con: Jungje Choi, Skyline

Moderator: Kristiana Yao, Naperville North Room 415 NW

Debate: Resolved, that developing countries be exempt from environmental regulations.

The deterioration of the environment has grown into a pressing global concern, underscored

by rising energy costs and the denial of global warming by certain GOP candidates. Political

jibes aside, however, there exists a very real and urgent pressure to tighten environmental

regulations and improve their enforcement. Furthermore, the worst infractions often take

place in developing, industrializing countries. Activists argue that not only are environmental

safeguards crucial in such countries, but they are more in need there than anywhere else in

the world. Then there also lies the difficulty of classifying countries in the first place. Nations

such as India in China, while they both suffer from heavy pollution and are both developing

Block VIII | 11:10 - 12:00 Capitol Building


18/36

18

into world contenders, are still not considered fully developed countries and would be exempt

from environmental responsibilities, which has many environmentalists crying foul. Yet from a

fiscal and political standpoint, stringent regulations could wreak irrevocable havoc. Going

green tends to have a high price tag attached that emerging nations simply cannot afford.

Checking the growth of fledgling businesses could cause a serious stagnation of the economy.

In the end, is the protection of environment worth it?Pro: Shubham Patel, Vernon Hills

Con: Jenny Zavsatsky, Vernon Hills

Moderator: Mark Gaughan, Neuqua Valley Room 300 NW

Debate: Resolved, that China is not a legitimate threat to Americas global influence.

As the worlds fastest growing major economy and Americas largest foreign creditor, many

fear the inevitability of Chinas rise and Americas decline. Indeed, Americas foreign policy has

done nothing but further entrench these beliefs. Over the past few years, the U.S. has steadily

curtailed its military presence in the Pacific and has virtually turned its back on Taiwan. China

may also soon surpass the U.S. as the worlds largest GDP. Yet others assert that Chinas

purported financial power is in fact two-sided, keeping the country locked within an

undervalued dollar-yuan exchange rate and rendering China unable to establish its own sphere

of economic influence independent of the U.S. Furthermore, the nation is commensurate to a

demographic nightmare and is in need of drastic reforms that it has proven incapable of

making.

Pro: Karthik Bala, Naperville North

Con: Kimberly Liu, Neuqua Valley

Moderator: Jon Henricks, IMSA Room 400 NW

Thought Talk: Are rights merely privileges given to us by higher authorities?

If the right to a fair trial was not afforded to us in the Constitution, would we still have thatright? Should torture be forbidden worldwide, just because we are human beings, and the

Geneva Convention (half of which the United States did not sign) says so? Do we have the

inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness because we are people, or

because the government tells us that we do? If an establishment grants us a right while

retaining the authority to take it away, is it really a right? Where does one draw the line

between rights and privileges afforded to many? If the government can prevent me from

purchasing a gun, do I have the right to bear arms? At what point does an institution have the

power to grant rights? Should people be granted something just because they live and

breathe on Earth, or in a certain country? Do rights even exist?Moderator: Edeline Chen, Naperville Central Room 225 NW

Debate: Resolved, that organized religions corrupt individual beliefs.

Since the beginning of organized religious establishments, there have been dissenters who

refuse to accept the principles laid out for them by theological officials, no matter how

Block IX | 12:05 - 12:55 Capitol Building


19/36

19

convincing the logic or the promised result. Religious institutions offer their constituents an

opportunity to come together and practice what they believe with those who believe in the

same things, but one question - or some variation of it - has been asked over and over: are

theocratic leaders allowing faithful people to join them in their beliefs or telling them what

to believe? Some argue that religious organization helps people to form their own faiths and

create a sense of moral structure in their lives, while others claim that such establishmentslend themselves power and manipulate their constituents out of self-interest.

Pro: Chris Norris, IMSA

Con: Caroline Brunson, Springfield

Moderator: Glen Richardson, IMSA Room 415 NW

Resolved, that the Supreme Court decision Snyder vs. Phelps be overturned

In March 2006, members of the Westboro Baptist Church rallied at Lance Cpl. Matthew

Snyders funeral, chanting antigay slogans and carry signs that read Thank God for dead

soldiers. The group holds weekly pickets (schedule is posted on their website

www.godhatesfags.com) in front of military funerals in order to attract attention for their

anti-homosexual and antigovernment messages, whether or whether not the fallen soldier

was gay. Soon after the funeral, Matthews father Albert sued the church for causing him

emotional distress and violating his right to grieve privately. Others supported his decision,

arguing that soldiers deserve to be honored, and that their funerals are an inappropriate

venue for protesting. However, in March 2011, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of the

church, explaining that free speech is the foundation of democracy, no matter how

blasphemous the message. Nonetheless, should disrespecting soldiers who die for their

country constitute an exception? Will lowering the morale of soldiers affect the number that

chooses to serve in the future, and as a result affect our national security?

Pro: Alexa Maffei, IMSA

Con: Nathan Geldner, IMSAModerator: Pooja Saxena, Neuqua Valley Room 225NW

Debate: Resolved, that America has the resources to achieve total global domination.

By the end of the 20th Century, the United States of America had asserted itself as the

greatest military power in the world, but just how powerful is the USA? Leaving nuclear

weapons out of the picture, since using them wouldnt leave all that much to dominate, the

United States has something that many other military powers lack, the means to project its

power. In modern warfare, the ability to project power can basically be boiled down to the

number of aircraft carriers under a nations control. The United States currently controls 12,

one of which is in reserve, as compared to 10 controlled by every other nation in the world

combined. While the US possesses many advantages such as this one, are they enough tooverwhelm the sheer number of soldiers in countries such as China, on the other side of the

world? This, and other key questions, will be integral in reaching a conclusion as to whether

the United States of America has the resources to achieve total global domination.

Pro: Luke Dawson, Marian Central Catholic

Con: Misha Bogdanov, Vernon Hills

http://www.godhatesfags.com/http://www.godhatesfags.com/


20/36

20

Debate: Resolved, that the passing grade in public schools be raised to a B.

Many students would maintain that earning a low C or D in a class should not qualify them as

having passed and learned all of the course material. It is difficult for the average student to

fail a class using the current pass/fail criteria, but what if the passing grade was raised to a B?

Not only would this make honors classes a legitimate gamble, but it would also create a

stronger sieve between academic levels and provide a real impetus for students to put workinto school. Among these positive effects, it could be remarked that it would discourage

students from taking heavier course-loads and experimenting in subjects at which they do

not have a high level of skill.

Pro: Hamed Kadiani, Springfield

Con: James Chen, IMSA

Moderator: Casey Doherty, Marian Central Catholic Room 300 NW

Debate:Resolved, that fictitious names and accounts be allowed on Facebook and all other

social networking sites.

With the advent of the Internet the issue of anonymity has been revitalized in the public

mind. The Internet has thrived on open discussion where contributors can freely seek and

offer advice on sensitive issues under the protection of anonymitywithout which few would

feel comfortable enclosing their personal problems in a public forum. On the other hand, the

Internet has empowered bullies to harass their victims with greater effects than ever before

through a means that makes it virtually impossible for victims to confront their perpetrators.

Many social networking sites have removed the wall between on-line and off-line social life

by limiting users to one account which identifies themselves by their real names. Doing so

has effectively stopped bullies from disassociating themselves from their real life persona by

using a plurality of pseudonyms. Yet Internet entrepreneur Christopher Poole argues, We all

have multiple identities. Its not abnormal; its just part of being human...Its not who you

share with, its who you share as. Multiple identities allow greater user protection forpersonal and professional distinctions than the 'lists' and 'circles' offered by Facebook and

Google+ respectively, prioritizing privacy when users wish to explore new communities and

interests and promoting the individual's ability to choose how they present themselves to the

world.

Pro: Allex Lubbers, Port Huron

Con: Neil Bingham, Marian Central Catholic

Moderator: Max Glas, Naperville Central Room 328 NW

Keynote Speaker Glenn Grothman, Wisconsin State Senator

Best Speaker Awards Convention Coordinator Kimberly Liu

Director of Debate Edeline Chen

Farwell Address Governor Aadi Tolappa

Closing Session | 1:00 - 1:30 Capitol Building

Assembly Chamber


21/36

21

Keynote Speaker

Mark F. Miller: Democratic Minority Leader, Wisconsin State Senate

Senator Mark F. Miller was born in Boston, Massachusetts and raised

in Middleton, Wisconsin. After receiving his Bachelor of Science

degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, he served as a

fighter pilot in the Wisconsin Air National Guard, retiring at the rank

of Lieutenant Colonel after 30 years in the Guard. Miller then went

on to become a member of the Wisconsin State Assembly,

representing the 48th

district from 1999 through 2005. In 2004 he

was elected to the Wisconsin State Senate. He is now serving his

second term and is the Senate Democratic Leader.

As senator, Miller is a leading advocate in health care reform. He has led the fight to pass a

statewide health care plan in Wisconsin and is committed to making health care both

affordable and accessible. He is also dedicated to sound environmental policy and conservation

efforts. He is the author of legislation that reduce dependence on imported energy, create jobs,

and encourage a cleaner environment.

In early February of this year, Senator Miller became actively involved in the 2011 Wisconsin

budget protests. In a highly publicized demonstration, Miller led Wisconsins 14 Senate

Democrats out of the state to deny the quorum necessary to vote on Governor Scott Walkers

controversial Budget Repair Bill, which would take away state employees bargaining rights and

increase health care costs and contributions to pensions. Although the bill was passed

nonetheless this March, Senator Miller captured the attention of the nation, inspiring popular

interest in the budget crisis and in the protection of workers rights.


22/36

22

Keynote Speaker

Glenn Grothman: Republican Assistant Majority Leader, Wisconsin State Senate

Senator Glenn Grothman was born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and

raised in the nearby town of Mequon. He received both his Bachelor

of Business Administration degree and Juris Doctor degree from the

University of Wisconsin-Madison. After graduating from law school,

Grothman practiced as a tax and real estate attorney for 10 years until

his election to the Wisconsin State Assembly in 1993. He served as an

assemblyman until 2004, upon which he entered the Wisconsin State

Senate. He is now serving his second term as Senator after re-election

in 2008 and is the Republican Assistant Majority Leader.

Grothman has won many distinctions as a legislator, including the Assembly Tax Cutter of the

Year(Milwaukee County Republican Party), Hero Award (Wisconsin Bear Hunters

Association), Sanctity of Life Award, (Wisconsin Rights to Life), Guardian of Small Business

Award (National Federation of Independent Businesses),Outstanding Legislator Award

(Wisconsin Counties Association),Working For Wisconsin Award (Wisconsin Manufacturers

and Commerce), Legislator of the Year (Wisconsin Builders Association, Pro-Life Wisconsin,

Independent Business Association, Wisconsin Guild of Midwives, Apartment Association,

Wisconsin Curves for Women), and many others.

In early spring of this year, Senator Grothman became entangled in the 2011 Wisconsin budget

protests. He and other fellow supporters of Governor Walkers Budget Repair Bill were among

the Republican senators targeted by protestors. Recall campaigns were also launched against

the Democratic senators who left the state to deny the bill a quorum. Although 3 Democrats

and 6 Republicans were eventually recalled, the motion against Senator Grothman did not

garner enough support and he is again up for re-election in 2012 with a formidable repertoire

of accomplishments under his belt.


23/36

23

Keynote Speaker

Jeff Burkhart: Executive Director, Literacy Network of Dane County

Jeff Burkhart has worked in adult education and organizational

development in the non-profit, healthcare, and educational sectors. His

areas of expertise include developing environments for improved

organizational learning and learner motivation, transfer of learning

techniques, and understanding of communication styles.

Jeff has helped improve teamwork in non-profit organizations and has

developed curricula for adult basic education and workplace learning

programs. He has created and implemented leadership development programs as well as

seminars on collaborative work environments to sustain long-term improvement. Jeff has a

masters degree in continuing and vocational education from the University of Wisconsin-

Madison, where he focused on participatory education for adult basic learners.Jeff has worked with several organizations serving the basic needs of adult learners. He

supervised workplace programs at the Dane County Job Center, created numerous learning

programs at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, and coordinated outreach for the

BadgerCare Plus program for the State of Wisconsin.

Jeff is currently the Executive Director of Literacy Network of Dane County, a non-profit

organization serving over a thousand adult learners throughout Dane County. He also serves on

the board of Wisconsin Literacy, a statewide coalition of literacy providers, and is a member of

the executive team of HealthWatch Wisconsin.


24/36

24

Message from the Fundraising Department

Hello and welcome to Fall State!

As all chapter leadership knows, fundraising is integral to maintaining an active chapter.

Whether it be hosting a mini-con, providing financial assistance to members, or even buyingpizza for a meeting, the money has to come from somewhere. Even large chapters such as

Naperville North have to deal with this problem, and for smaller chapters, it can be a significant

setback in addition to other problems.

This year, the Midwest has started a fundraising department to help chapters raise

money for activities and conventions. We will be testing out different ideas over the year to

alleviate the fundraising problem at conventions. For example, at this convention, we are

piloting a program in which chapters can sell items to JSA members to raise money for activities.

Other upcoming ideas include a chapter raffle or even a poker tournament with representatives

from different chapters.

If you have ideas regarding fundraising or you just need assistance with ways to raise

funds for your chapter, you can contact me at [email protected]. I am always available for

help.

Karthik Bala

Director of Fundraising

Message from the Publicity Department

Hello yall,

This year for the Midwest Publicity we have a couple of new things for everyone: anewly designed JSA website and a Twitter account! Our new website layout includes upcoming

mini-conventions information, a photo gallery, and depicts the Chapter Map for all to use. We

have changed the format of the website so it is easier to navigate, and more aesthetically

pleasing. Also, since many JSAers are tech-savvy, we have created our Twitter account:

MW_JSA. Information about upcoming mini-conventions, regional conventions, current news,

and activism projects will be regularly added.

In the upcoming months, we are going to create our second Midwest JSA Promotional

video! The theme will be along the lines of student activism and why JSA is definitely better

than Speech and Debate team. We hope that all of these tools will be useful for ChapterPresidents, and everyone else to better receive information about JSA.

Lisa Swanson

Director of Publicity
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


25/36

25

Message from the Activism Department

Hello fellow statesmen!

This year JSA will focus its activism towards making a difference in Educational

standards both here in America and around the world. It is for this reason that we have chosen

to do a book drive at Fall State. All the books your chapters have brought in will be going

towards the Rotary Club Books for the World program, which sends these books to

impoverished schools in South Africa. These children normally do not have access to any

reading materials, thus our donations will make a significant impact on their lives. At the Civic

Engagement Fair you will see the Literacy Network, which is taking strides to improve adult

literacy here in Madison. Lastly, I challenge each and every chapter to make a difference in their

own communities, through the Adopt-a-Cause program. I ask that every chapter in the

Midwest find a cause or local organization to support for the duration of this year. If we stay

committed to making a change, our impact as a state could be incredible. So as Gandhi once

famously said, Be the change you wish to see in the world. Good luck Midwest JSA!

Nivetha Samy

Director of Activism

The Progressive: The Progressive is a historically leftwing magazine that was founded in 1909

during the Progressive movement by none other than Robert La Follette himself. The magazinelays its base in standing against militarism, the concentration of power in corporate hands, and

the disenfranchisement of ordinary citizens. The Progressive works to make change in regards

to social and economic justice, civil rights and liberties, preserving the environment and

sustaining freedom of speech.

Wisconsin Democracy Campaign: The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign is an organization

devoted to reforming the democratic process in modern America. It is a non partisan watchdog

group that is focused on tracking money in state politics; fighting corruption, creating

government transparency, and creating an overall more honest government which the average

citizen can easily participate in.

University of Wisconsin at Madison Republicans: The U-W Madison Republicans are a

collegiate organization of the Republican Party. They align themselves with the political views

of the Republicans, and on campus hold many events to rally fellow conservatives. They have

been visited in the past by many electoral candidates, and are an excellent example of

collegiate involvement in the political process.

Civic Engagement Fair


26/36

26

Civic Engagement Fair (Continued)

Literacy Network: The Literacy Network is composed of over 400 teachers and volunteers who

devote their time to teaching literacy skills to illiterate adults in the Dane county area. All

programs are free of charge, as they help these adults who may be in poverty, lack education,

have learning disabilities or are immigrants; develop the skills to fully integrate into a literate

society. Litnetwork works with over 2000 adults a year, to proactively combate an illiterate

society.

Rotary Club Books for the World: The program began in 2000 with two Rotarians, one from

America and the other from Johannesburg, South Africa. After seeing American schools dispose

of textbooks on such a regular basis, and witnessing entire classrooms in South Africa go

without reading materials, the Rotarians have taken it upon themselves to take unused books

from this country to places where they are more needed. Since then over 1.3 million bookshave been sent to over 3 different continents and continue to change lives globally.

University of Wisconsin Democrats: The University of Wisconsin at Madisons collegiate branch

of the Democratic Party. Liberal students on campus have come together to support

Democratic values and candidates, and can been seen actively conducting rallies, holding

meetings, and voter registration drives. The Democrats were last seen participating in the

Recall Walker rally, in which they campaigned for the withdrawal of Governor Walker from

Wisconsin State Legislature.

Wisconsin Network for Peace and Justice: The Network was established in 1991 by citizenswho felt compelled to speak out for a sustainable world free of violence and injustice. WNPJ

believes that American society has lost its ethical compass, and thus campaigns for prison

reform, social and economic justice, alternatives to militarism, sustainable agriculture,

immigrant rights and renewable energy. Since its founding, WNPJ has partnered with over 170

peace, environmental, and human rights agencies.

Fair Wisconsin: An organization with a mission to improve the civil rights of Gays and Lesbians

throughout the country through electoral involvement and direct legislative democracy.

Through movements by Fair Wisconsin they were able to be the first state in the Midwest to

protect domestic partnerships. This organization has built strong connections with key political

figures in Wisconsin, and works every day to earn equality for everyone regardless of their

orientation.


27/36

27

Midwest JSA Calendar

November 19-20, 2011 Fall State ConventionMadison Concourse Hotel, Wisconsin State Capitol

Madison, WI

January 17, 2012 Winter Congress Registration Deadline

January 21, 2012 Neuqua Valley MiniconNeuqua Valley High School

Naperville, IL

February 17-20, 2012 Winter Congress Convention

DoubleTree Crystal City HotelWashington DC, Arlington VA

April TBD, 2012 Spring State ConventionLocation TBD

Chicagoland, IL

Title Name Email

Program Director Lindsey Bowen [email protected]

Governor Aadi Tolappa [email protected]

Lieutenant Governor Nesh Patel [email protected]

Chapter Internal Affairs Director Praneeth Tripuraneni [email protected]

Important Note: Get approval from your school administration for major conventions

6-8 weeks prior to the event. Your school may require even more advanced notice.

Chapter Presidents and Teacher Advisors should work together to clear trips with your

schools administration.

Midwest Contacts


28/36

28

Name: ________________________ School: _____________________

Quality of Debate (circle one): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Poor Average Outstanding

Difficulty of Debate (circle one): 1 2 3 4 5Easy Medium Difficult

Thank you!

Comments/Feedback:

Debate Feedback Sheets

Name: ________________________ School: _____________________

Quality of Debate (circle one): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Poor Average Outstanding

Difficulty of Debate (circle one): 1 2 3 4 5Easy Medium Difficult

Thank you!

Comments/Feedback:


29/36

29

How does one become a JSA Scholar or a JSA Ambassador?

All across the nation there is a vibrant new spirit of service emerging. The Junior State of America is

challenging its members to answer that call to action by taking leadership roles in this movement by

becoming aJSA Scholar or JSA Ambassador.

JSA Scholar:

Be a tax-paid member of an official JSA Chapter Attend at least one JSA overnight convention Graduate from one of the JSA Summer Schools or JSA Diplomat Program

Benefits of JSA Scholar Membership include:

Automatic$750scholarshiptothe2012 JSASummer School at Stanford,Princetonor Georgetown Recognition as a JSA Scholar on the JSA website and at JSA programs. Eligibility for JSA Scholarship Funds for domestic 2012 JSA Summer Schools. One-on-one fundraising coaching from our experienced staff.

Become a part of the JSA alumni network. The new friends you make this summer will be apart of your network for decades to come and you'll be connected to JSA alumni who areleaders in a variety of professions.

JSA Ambassador:

Be a tax-paid member of an official JSA Chapter Attend at least 2 conventions during the 2011/2012 academic year Submit Summer School Application by Dec. 31st 2011 Graduate from one of the JSA Summer Schools or JSA Diplomat Program Recruit at least one non-JSA member to attend a 2012 JSA Summer School. (Recruited student

must enroll and attend for you to become a JSA Ambassador.)

Benefits of JSA Ambassador Membership include: Automatic$1,250 scholarshiptothe2012 JSASummerSchoolatStanford, PrincetonorGeorgetown Recognition as a JSA Ambassador on the JSA website and at JSA programs. Recruit non JSA members to attend a 2012 Summer School.

-One student = a free registration to a 2012-2013 JSA overnight convention.

-Two students = 3 free registrations for 2012 2013 JSA overnight conventions.

-Three or more students =a full scholarship to JSAs Election 2012 Symposia at either

the Republican or Democratic National Conventions.

A letter of recommendation from JSA CEO, Jeff Harris, to include in your college applications. Eligibility for JSA Scholarship Funds for domestic 2012 JSA Summer Schools. Lifetime membership in the JSA Alumni Association. With 4,000 plus members the JSAAA gives

you access to special alumni events and job opportunities after you graduate from high school.

A special JSA Ambassador T-shirt.

Get Started Now!Visit summer.jsa.org/scholar for more information on the JSA Scholar & JSA Ambassador

Program!

OR

Use your smart phone to scan this qr code and visit automatically.


30/36

30

STUDENT APPLICATION FORMFor 2012 Junior Statesmen Summer Programs

To the Applicant

A complete application includes:1. This student application form or online application (www.jsa.org/summer/apply)2. Two essays, typed and doublespaced (Please see brochure, second to last

page, or website for essay instructions).3. A recommendation from a counselor or social studies or English teacher.

4. An official transcript sent by your school.

Im applying to the JUNIOR STATESMEN SUMMER SCHOOL session at:____ Georgetown ____ Princeton ____ Stanford ____ Beijing, China

(Place a 1 by your first choice campus and a 2 by your second choice. If you apply to a session that is filled or for which you are notqualified, we will try to honor your second choice.)

Name: ______________________________________________________________________________Please Print First Last

Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________Street City State Zip

Home Phone: ( ______ ) _____________________ Cell Phone: ( ______) ________________________

Email Address: _____________________________ Parents Email Address: ______________________

Birthday: ____/____/____ Age:___ Male Female Graduation Year: __________

School _________________________________________ School City/State______________________

Email for your teacher recommendation___________________________________________

Georgetown (July 8-July 29) Stanford (July 1-July 22) JSA Diplomats (June 27-July 22)Check class for which you Check class for which you Beijing, Chinaare applying: are applying: Check class for which youAP U.S. Government AP U.S. Government are applying:International Relations AP Macroeconomics Chinese Government andConstitutional Law International Relations Modern historyMedia and Politics Constitutional LawSpeech and Political Speech and Political

Communications CommunicationsPresidency (NEW)

Princeton (July 8-July 29)

Check one in the first sectionOR AP U.S. History

AP U.S. Government AP Macroeconomics International Relations Speech and Political

Communications AP U.S. History (July 1 -

July 29)

China and Stanford applicants, mail to:Admissions OfficeJunior Statesmen Summer School800 South Claremont St, Suite 202San Mateo, CA 94402

800.334.5353 Fax 650.347.7200

Georgetown and Princeton applicants,mail to:Admissions OfficeJunior Statesmen Summer School1411 K Street NW, Suite 200

Washington, D.C. 20005

800.317.9338 Fax 202.296.7839


31/36

31

1. All rules for school field trips prevail. Use of illegal drugs or alcohol is not permitted .

Students also will be punished if they are in a room where drugs or alcohol are present. The

use of tobacco products is not allowed. To ensure these rules are obeyed, theTeacher/Advisor and The Junior Statesmen Foundation must approve the attendance of

each delegate. We reserve the right to deny any student the privilege of attending the

event.

2. At 7 p.m., students will meet with their Teacher/Advisor for roll call and may not leave thehotel thereafter. At curfew, Teacher/Advisors will check delegates at their rooms. Delegates

must remain quietly in their own rooms after curfew. Pizza deliveries and room service

deliveries are not permitted after curfew. Delegates also are required to meet with the

Teacher/Advisor at other designated times.

3. Delegates MUST attend all conference activities.

4. At no time may young men and women be in each others' rooms.

5. Delegates may not leave the convention hotel without the permission of their

Teacher/Advisor. During meal times, with their Teacher/Advisor's permission, delegates

may leave the hotel to eat in designated areas. Under no circumstances are delegates to

leave the hotel after 8:00 p.m.

6. Delegates must wear their name tags above the waist in a visible location at all times.

7. All students assigned to a room are responsible for any charges made to the room. All

students assigned to a room are also responsible for the condition of the room. No outside

phone calls can be made from student hotel rooms. Room service and other items may not

be charged to a students room. No delegate may change rooms without the permission of

The Junior Statesmen staff members at the event. The hotel staff will house four students in

each room with two large double beds.8. No student may drive a car to the convention or ride in a student driven car during the

convention.

9. Visitors are not allowed in the convention hotel. Delegates are not allowed to associate with

any visitor who is not an official guest of the Junior Statesmen program.

10.Students are expected to dress appropriately. Delegates should respect the rights of other

hotel guests and not do anything to damage the reputation of the Junior Statesmen

program. Students must not open or throw anything out of windows. Students must stay off

balconies.

11.Students should not bring expensive items to the convention. Valuable items must be

stored in the hotel safe or with the bellmen. The Junior State/The Junior State Foundationare not responsible for items stored in a luggage storage area. No large radios or portable

stereos are allowed.

12.Delegates or delegations that are sent home for conduct problems WILL NOT RECEIVE A

REFUND.

13.Delegates and their parents agree that The Junior State may use any photographs or video

taken during the convention for promotional purposes.

Convention Rules


32/36

32

Hotel Map

Senate

Room

B

Senate

Room

A

Assembly

Room

Wisconsin

BallroomCapital Ballroom

A B C D

1st

Floor

2nd

Floor

University Rooms


33/36

33

Capitol Building Map

Room Floor Wing

Assembly Chamber 2 West

North Hearing Room 2 North

Parlor 2 West

Room 225 NW 2 North-WestRoom 300 NW 3 North-West

Room 328 NW 3 North-West



The Wisconsin State Capitol Building is laid out in the shape of a compass rose.

The chart above indicates the name of each room, the floor it is on, and the wing it is in.Stars indicate the wings in use.

The West Wing serves as your entrance and exit point.

Avoid the South Entrance. A protest will be taking place there on Saturday.


34/36

34

The Madison Concourse Hotel (A) and the Wisconsin State Capitol Building (B) are marked on

the map below with stars. The hotel is located at 1 West Dayton Street. The Capitol Building is

located in the middle of Capitol Square. Enter through the West entrance, which is located atthe corner of Carroll Street and State Street.

On Saturday, a protest will be taking place near the South Entrance (lightning bolt).

Be careful crossing streets and navigating the city!

Directions

STATE STREET


35/36

35

Dining Guide

Fast Food

Subway

462 State St.

Qdoba Mexican Grill

548 State St.

Taco Bell/KFC

534 State St.

Five Guys

517 State St.

Noodles & Company

232 State St.

Chipotle

658 State St.

American

Buffalo Wild Wings

529 State St.

Pizza Hut

662 State St.

Ginos Restaurant

540 State St.

Milios Sandwiches

449 State St.

State Bar & Grill

118 State St.

Starbucks Coffee

661 State St.

International

Asian Kitchen

449 State St.

Takara

315 State St.

Taste of Tibet

430 State St.

Chautara Restaurant

334 State St.

Frida Mexican Grill

117 State St.

Parthenon

316 State St.

State Street is the road that leads directly from the West corner of Capitol Square. It has

been converted into a pedestrian mall with hundreds of shops and is a major tourist

attraction. The dining guide below provides only a small index of the many restaurants that

line State Street so feel free to explore on your own!


36/36

Saturday

Capitol Building Room 300 NW Room 328 NW Room 225 Room 400 NW Room 415 NW

10:00 - 11:00Opening Session

(Assembly Chamber)

Block I

11:05 - 11:50

Moderating

Workshop

Debate

Workshop

UN Security

Council

Privatizing Social

Security

Should US support

protestors? (TT)Block II

11:55 - 12:45

US should respect

international

desires

US no longer

subsidize

petroleum

Increase quotas

on skilled worker

visas

US take a stance

against media

censorship

Teacher unions

are detrimental to

education

12:50 - 2:05 Lunch

Block III

2:10 - 2:55

Keynote Speaker

(Assembly Room)

Block IV

3:00 - 3:50

Does birthplace

affect success?

(TT)

Source of

government

power? (TT)

Polarization of

parties reflects

constituents

Civic Engagement Fair

(North Hearing Room)

Hotel University Room A University Room B University Room C University Room D Assembly Room

4:35 - 5:05Chapter Caucus and Key Distribution

(Senate A and B)

Block V

5:10 - 6:00

Internet is the

most important

infrastructure

How should

government

define marriage?

(TT)

America is still the

land of

opportunity

It was in the best

interest of the US

to cut financial

aid to Pakistan

US law

enforcement be

involved in NCAA

violations

6:00 - 8:00 Dinner

Block VI

8:15 - 9:05

Sin taxes violate

consumers rights

NATO be

dissolved

US withdrawal

from Afghanistan

Hipsters

(TT)

Government fund

innovation

Night Block I

9:10-10:00

America could

defeat any nation

Annexation of

Canada

Lax bro

subculture

Harry Potter

promotes witching

Impromptu

Speaking

Night Block II10:00 12:00 Quiz Bowl(Wisconsin Ballroom) Dance(Capitol Ballroom)

Sunday

8:00 - 10:00 Checkout & Breakfast

Capitol Building Room 300 NW Room 328 NW Room 225 Room 400 NW Room 415 NW

Block VII

10:15 - 11:05

US economy most

important at end

of 21st

century

Student

responsibility in

education

US obligation to

promote

democracy in

Middle East

Democratic

leader should

represent religion

Macs vs. PCs

(TT)

Block VIII

11:10 - 12:00

Developing

countries should

be exempt fromenvironmental

regulations

All American

airports undergoIsraelification

Are rights merely

privileges given

by higherauthorities?

(TT)

China not a

legitimate threat

to US global

influence

American

economic system

fosters class

conflict

Block IX

12:05 - 12:55

Passing grade be

raised to a B

Fictitious

accounts be

allowed on social

networking sites

Snyder vs. Phelps

be overturned

America has

resources to

achieve global

domination

Organized

religions corrupt

individual beliefs

1:00 1:30Closing Session

Skeleton Agenda

fall state 2011 agenda

Documents