fall 08 background paper prepared for the 2019 global ......to assist in drafting the 2019 gem...

55
Martha K. Ferede 2018 HIGHER EDUCATION FOR REFUGEES This paper was commissioned by the Global Education Monitoring Report as background information to assist in drafting the 2019 GEM Report, Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls. It has not been edited by the team. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the Global Education Monitoring Report or to UNESCO. The papers can be cited with the following reference: “Paper commissioned for the 2019 Global Education Monitoring Report, Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls”. For further information, please contact [email protected]. Background paper prepared for the 2019 Global Education Monitoring Report Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls ED/GEMR/MRT/2018/P1/24/Rev 2

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • M a r t h a K . F e r e d e 2 0 1 8

    HIGHER EDUCATION FOR REFUGEES

    This paper was commissioned by the Global Education Monitoring Report as background information to assist in drafting the 2019 GEM Report, Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls. It has not been edited by the team. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the Global Education Monitoring Report or to UNESCO. The papers can be cited with the following reference: “Paper commissioned for the 2019 Global Education Monitoring Report, Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls”. For further information, please contact [email protected].

    08Fall

    Background paper prepared for the 2019 Global Education Monitoring Report

    Migration, displacement and education: Building bridges, not walls

    ED/GEMR/MRT/2018/P1/24/Rev2

  • 2

    CONTENTSAcronyms.......................................................................................................................................................3

    Terminology...................................................................................................................................................4

    Abstract.........................................................................................................................................................5

    Introduction...................................................................................................................................................6

    Part1:Impetus,InternationalConventionsandenrolmentdata...................................................................61a.Whydoeshighereducationforrefugeesmatter?........................................................................61b.Internationaldeclarationsandconventions...............................................................................101c.Refugees’highereducationenrolmentdata...............................................................................11

    PartII:BarrierstoHigherEducationforRefugees.........................................................................................162a.Missingqualificationsandevaluationofcredentials..................................................................172b.Interruptededucation/gapsinlearning....................................................................................182c.Limitedlanguageproficiency.......................................................................................................182d.Informationbarrier.....................................................................................................................202e.Prohibitivecostofhighereducation...........................................................................................212f.Hostcountrylimitedresourcestoexpandhighereducationtorefugees...................................222g.LegislativeChallenges..................................................................................................................232h.Insecurityinhostcountries.........................................................................................................24

    PartIII:IncentivesandProgrammes.............................................................................................................253a.Alternativecredentialevaluationschemes.................................................................................253b.Hostlanguage-learninginitiatives...............................................................................................273c.Scholarshipschemes...................................................................................................................273d.Refugeepeer-to-peerinitiatives.................................................................................................333e.Onlineandblendedhighereducationforrefugees....................................................................343f.Initiativessupportingacademicsinneedofrefuge.....................................................................373g.CapacitybuildinginitiativesoffacultyandstaffatHEIs..............................................................393h.Resettlementthroughhighereducation.....................................................................................40

    CaseStudy:WUSCStudentRefugeeProgramme..........................................................................................42

    PartIV:Recommendations...........................................................................................................................47Policy.................................................................................................................................................47Research............................................................................................................................................49

    Conclusion....................................................................................................................................................50

    References...................................................................................................................................................52

  • 3

    ACRONYMS

    AY Academicyear

    CEFR CommonEuropeanFrameworkofReference

    Cara CouncilforAt-RiskAcademics

    CLCC ConnectedLearninginCrisisConsortium

    DAFI AlbertEinsteinGermanAcademicRefugeeInitiative

    ERN EuropeanResettlementNetwork

    HEI HigherEducationInstitution

    IIE InstituteofInternationalEducation

    ISCED TheInternationalStandardClassificationofEducation

    MOOC MassiveOpenOnlineCourse

    NARIC NationalAcademicRecognitionInformationCentresintheEuropeanUnion

    NOKUT NorwegianAgencyforQualityAssuranceinEducation

    SAR ScholarsatRisk

    SDG SustainableDevelopmentGoals

    SRP StudentRefugeeProgram

    TOEFL TestofEnglishasaForeignLanguage

    TVET TechnicalandVocationalEducationandTraining

    UIS UNESCOInstituteforStatistics

    UN UnitedNations

    UNESCO UnitedNationsEducationScientificandCulturalOrganization

    UNHCR UnitedNationsHighCommissionerforRefugees

    UNICEF UnitedNationsChildren’sEducationFund

    WUSC WorldUniversityServiceofCanada

  • 4

    TERMINOLOGYAsylumSeeker

    Anasylum-seekerissomeonewhoserequestforsanctuaryhasyettobeprocessed(UNHCR,2016a).

    HigherEducation

    Ingeneral,highereducationisconsideredasformaleducationthatfollowssecondaryeducation.Assuch,highereducationisalsoreferredtoaspost-secondaryortertiaryeducation.

    For thepurposesof thispaper, I use the International StandardClassificationofEducation (ISCED)description(UNESCOInstituteforStatistics[UIS],2012).TheISCEDdistinguishesbetween:

    • Short-cycletertiaryeducationprogrammesatISCEDlevel5(atleasttwoyears);• Bachelor’sorequivalentfirstdegreeprogrammesatISCEDlevel6(threetofouryears);• Bachelor’sorequivalentlongfirstdegreeprogrammesatISCEDlevel6(morethanfour

    years);• Master’sorequivalentlongfirstdegreeprogrammesatISCEDlevel7(atleastfiveyears);• Doctorallevel-thesuccessfulcompletionofISCEDlevel7isusuallyrequiredforentryinto

    ISCEDlevel8.

    Tertiaryeducationandhighereducationareusedinterchangeably.

    HigherEducationInstitutions(HEIs)

    Referstouniversities,othereducationalestablishments,centresandstructuresofhighereducation,and centres of research and culture associatedwith any of the above, public or private, that areapproved as such, either through recognised accreditation systems or by the competent stateauthorities(UNESCO,1997).

    Refugee

    The1951UNConventionRelatingtotheStatusofRefugees,Section1(A)definesarefugeeas:“Apersonwhoowingtoawell-foundedfearofbeingpersecutedforreasonsofrace,religion,nationality,membershipofaparticularsocialgrouporpoliticalopinionisoutsidethecountryofhisnationalityandisunableor,owingtosuchfear,isunwillingtoavailhimselfoftheprotectionofthatcountry;orwho,nothavinganationalityandbeingoutsidethecountryofhisformerhabitualresidenceasaresultofsuchevents,isunableor,owingtosuchfear,isunwillingtoreturntoit”

    (UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly[UNGA],1951).InlinewithUNHCR(2018a,p.61)definitions,“Therefugeepopulationalsoincludespeopleinrefugee-likesituationsthatincludesgroupsofpeoplewhoareoutsidetheircountryorterritoryoforiginandwhofaceprotectionriskssimilartothoseofrefugeesbutforwhomrefugeestatushas,forpracticalorotherreasons,notbeenascertained.”

  • ABSTRACT

    Higher education holds many benefits for refugees. Yet, historically, their higher education

    opportunitieshavebeenverylimited.Thispaperaddressesrefugees’accessto,andparticipationin,

    higher education by examining factors that serve as barriers. It then specifies initiatives aimed at

    increasing access. A case study based on original research delves deeply into how peer-to-peer

    sponsorship holds great promise for increasing higher education access and durable solutions for

    refugeeyouth.Thepapercloseswithrecommendationsforpolicyandresearch.

  • 6

    INTRODUCTION

    In 2016, less than 1% of refugee youth had access to higher education. A myriad of challenges

    accountforthislowrate,includinglearninggapsduetointerruptedschooling,issueswithacademic

    credentials,financialconstraintsandlimitedfluencyinthelanguageofinstruction.

    Thispaperaddressesrefugees’accesstohighereducationinthreeparts;thefirstpartgroundsthe

    issue by demonstrating the impetus for higher education for refugees, outlining the international

    conventionsthatcall forrefugees’participation inhighereducationandprovidingenrolmentdata.

    The second part outlines the various barriers to access. In the third part, the paper identifies

    initiativesdesignedtoincreasehighereducationaccessforrefugees.Inthissection,adetailedcase

    studyontheWorldUniversityServiceofCanada’s(WUSC)StudentRefugeeProgram(SRP)describes

    auniqueinitiativethatoffersrefugeeyouthaccesshighereducationandtothedurablesolutionof

    resettlement.Thepapercloseswithrecommendationsforpolicyandresearch.

    PART1:IMPETUS,INTERNATIONALCONVENTIONSANDENROLMENTDATA

    1a.Whydoeshighereducationforrefugeesmatter?

    The benefits of higher education are best organised under those garnered at the individual and

    societal levels. At the individual level, economists note advantages to education are particularly

    robust with the completion of a bachelor’s degree. Higher education has been shown to be a

    gateway to upward social and economicmobility by enabling access to higher-skilled, better-paid

    positions,accesstowell-connectedsocialnetworks,andentryintothemiddleclass(Ma,Pender,&

    Welch,2016).TheOECD(2011)foundthat in‘Brazil,theCzechRepublic,Greece,Hungary,Poland,

    theSlovakRepublicandtheUnitedStates,menholdingadegreefromauniversityoranadvanced

    research programme earn at least 80% more than men who have an upper secondary or post-

    secondarynon-tertiaryeducation.InBrazil,Greece,Hungary,Ireland,Japan,theSlovakRepublic,the

    UnitedKingdomandtheUnitedStates,womenhaveasimilaradvantage’(p.139).

    Besides individual economic gains, personswith a bachelor’s degree aremore tolerant of others,

    tendtohavelowerchildmortalityrates,andlivelongerandhealthierlives.Thepublicbenefitsofan

  • 7

    educated population include a lowered burden on criminal and social services, increased political

    engagementandincreasedtaxesfromahigher-earninglabourforce(Baum,Ma,&Payea,2013).

    The private and public benefits of higher education appear to hold irrespective of immigration

    status.Thepertinentquestionis;doeshighereducationmatterinparticularforrefugees,andifso,

    why?

    SUPPORTSDURABLESOLUTIONSFORREFUGEES

    Access to primary and secondary education iswidely accepted to be critical to thewellbeing and

    livelihoodofallchildren.However,highereducationforrefugeeshasonlycomeintofocusinrecent

    years.Thisisdue,inpart,toUNHCR’s2012-2016EducationStrategythatforthefirsttime,included

    highereducationforrefugeesasakeypriorityarea.Priortothis,itwasrarelyconsideredaspartofa

    humanitarianresponsestrategy.

    HighereducationholdsvalueforallthreeofUNHCR’ssolutions1forrefugees:

    1)Repatriationintotheircountryoforigin2;

    2)Integrationintocurrentcountryofasylum;

    3)Resettlementintoathirdcountry.

    Highereducationplaysan important role inadvancing refugees’ integration intohost societies, in

    developing skill sets that canbe leveraged for entry into labourmarkers and towardpost-conflict

    reconstructionincountriesoforigin. Forexample,astudyof5,000universitygraduateswhoheld

    DAFI scholarships (UNHCR’s higher education scholarship programme)3 and had completed their

    studiesinAfrica,Asia,theAmericasandEurope,foundthat78%ofthoseintegratedintotheirhost

    countries and 93% of those who had repatriated were employed (Morlang & Watson, 2007).

    Graduatescontributedtothehumanresourceneedsofthedevelopingcountrieswheretheywere

    1Formoredetail,visithttp://www.unhcr.org/solutions.html2UNHCRprioritisesthepromotionofenablingconditionsforvoluntaryrepatriation.Theseshouldensurethatindividualscanexerciseafreeandinformedchoice,andtomobilisesupportforreturnees.UNHCRpromotesandfacilitatesvoluntaryrepatriationthroughvariousmeans.Safeanddignifiedvoluntaryrepatriationrequiresthefullcommitmentofthecountryoforigintohelpreintegrateitsownpeople.3ForadetaileddescriptionoftheDAFI,seepage28.

  • 8

    hosted or repatriated and also supported these countries’ reconstruction and sustainable

    development.Sincemanyheldleadershippositions,theyalsoservedasimportantrolemodels,4thus

    amplifyingtheoriginalscholarshipinvestment(Morlang&Watson,2007).

    SERVESAPROTECTIVEFUNCTION

    Education,atalllevels,performsaprotectivefunction(UNHCR&UNESCO,2016).Highereducation

    protects refugees frommarginalisation and abuse (Kirk & Sherab, 2016). According to Barakat &

    Milton (2015), higher education can also help young men and women to remain hopeful and

    resistant,protectingthemfromthepullandrhetoricofextremistgroups.

    OFFERSAPOSITIVEIDENTITY

    The1951UNConventionRelating to theStatusofRefugees, Section1(A)definesa refugeeas: ‘A

    person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion,

    nationality,membershipofaparticularsocialgrouporpoliticalopinionisoutsidethecountryofhis

    nationalityandisunableor,owingtosuchfear,isunwillingtoavailhimselfoftheprotectionofthat

    country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual

    residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it’

    (UNGA,1951).

    Thus,lossandfeararenotonlycentraltothedefinitionofrefugees,theirexperiences,butarealso

    part of the dominant narrative and collective imagination of ‘refugee-ness’ (Zeus, 2011).5 When

    they enter higher education institutions, refugees adopt the (additional) identity of student and

    scholarandbenefitfromthepositiveconnotationsofthisidentification.Highereducationstudents

    are often heralded the future innovators, thinkers and leaders of knowledge–based societies. In

    essence,theidentityofstudentisnotheavywithlossbutratherhopefulwithpossibility.6

    4Thiswasespeciallytrueforfemalerefugees,whoservedasmentorsforfemalesintheircommunity.

    5Refugeesalsocrossotherbarrierssuchaslinguisticandculturalborders.Theyalsomoveacrossinternalbordersofidentity.Thedominantnarrative(oftendeficit-based)ofrefugeesplaysoutinmainstreammediaandthroughpoliticalrhetoric.6InanarticlebyYoung-Powell(2015)aSyrianasylumseekerinaGermanuniversitystated,‘Universityistheoneplacewhereyou’renotlabelled.’

  • 9

    PROVIDESACCESSTOSOCIALANDECONOMICMOBILITY

    Povertyisasignificantissueforrefugees.Forinstance,a2016WorldBankandUNHCRstudyfound

    that the majority of Syrian refugees living in Lebanon and Jordan were vulnerable and living in

    poverty.Thereportstatesthatin2014,

    Sevenin10registeredSyrianrefugeeslivinginJordanandLebanoncouldbeconsideredpoor.This number increases to 9 in 10 refugees if the poverty lines used by the respective hostcountriesareconsidered.ThepovertyofSyrianrefugeesishigherinJordanthaninLebanon.In Jordan, there is also evidence that poverty among refugees has increased by severalpercentagepointsbetween2013and2015.(Vermeetal.2016,p.xvi)

    As indicated earlier, higher education and particularly bachelor’s degrees, hold important private

    and public benefits. By providing the opportunity to access to skilled, well-paid positions in the

    labourmarket, higher education can provide refugeeswithmuch needed economic benefits. It is

    also a way for refugees to foster supportive social networks of peers and community members,

    whichisnecessaryforsuccessfulintegration.7

    CONTRIBUTESTOTHEPUBLICGOODROLEOFHIGHEREDUCATION

    Higher education has a ‘common public good’ role that extends beyond teaching and research.

    DuringUNESCO’s(1991)secondconsultationofNGOsonTheRoleofHigherEducationinSociety,the

    variousstakeholdersrecommendedthatinadditiontoexcellenceinteaching,trainingandresearch,

    the social function of higher education should be guided by ‘the relevance of services offered by

    highereducationinstitutionstotheperceivedpriorityneedsoftheirrespectivesocieties’(UNESCO,

    1991).8

    Providingaccesstorefugeesandasylumseekersispartofthepublicfunctionofhighereducation.At

    thelocallevel,educatedrefugeesarebetterabletoadaptandintegrateintohostcommunitiesand

    economies(incountrieswheretheyhavethelegalrighttowork).Inaddition,ifthosewhohavefled

    are ever able to return to their country of origin with skills and the understanding of the

    consequences of conflict, this has great value to rebuilding societies that prioritise peace. For

    instance,Coffie(2014)foundthatofLiberianrefugeereturneesfromGhanaandGuinea,thosewho

    7Detailsonhighereducation’sroleindevelopingsocialcapitalcanbefoundinthecasestudy(p.42)8UNESCOistheonlyUnitedNationsagencywithamandateinhighereducation.

  • 10

    were able to access higher education opportunities during their period of exile, deployed their

    professionsandskillstowardspeacebuildinguponreturningtoLiberia.

    In sum, there is a clear impetus for providing higher education access for refugees. Next, the

    conventionsthatunderpintheprovisionofhighereducationforrefugeesareoutlined.

    1b.Internationaldeclarationsandconventions

    Access to and provision of higher education for refugees finds support in several international

    declarations,resolutionsandconventionsincluding:

    • Article26oftheUniversalDeclarationofHumanRights:Everyonehastherighttoeducation.Educationshallbefree,atleastintheelementaryandfundamentalstages.Elementaryeducationshallbecompulsory.Technicalandprofessionaleducationshallbemadegenerallyavailableandhighereducationshallbeequallyaccessibletoallonthebasisofmerit(UNGA,1948);

    • Article22oftheConventionRelatingtotheStatusofRefugees:ContractingStatesshallaccordtorefugeesthesametreatmentasisaccordedtonationalswithrespecttoelementaryeducation;andTheContractingStatesshallaccordtorefugeestreatmentasfavourableaspossible,and,inanyevent,notlessfavourablethanthataccordedtoaliensgenerallyinthesamecircumstances,withrespecttoeducationotherthanelementaryeducationand,inparticular,asregardsaccesstostudies,therecognitionofforeignschoolcertificates,diplomasanddegrees,theremissionoffeesandchargesandtheawardofscholarships(UNGA,1951);

    • Article13.2coftheInternationalCovenantonEconomic,SocialandCulturalRights:Highereducationshallbemadeequallyaccessibletoall,onthebasisofcapacity,byeveryappropriatemeans,andinparticularbytheprogressiveintroductionoffreeeducation(UNGA,1966);

    • Article28oftheInternationalConventionontheRightsoftheChild:Makehighereducationaccessibletoallonthebasisofcapacitybyeveryappropriatemeans(UNGA,1989);

    • Article5e.VoftheConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofRacialDiscrimination:StatesPartiesundertaketoprohibitandtoeliminateracialdiscriminationinallitsformsandtoguaranteetherightofeveryone,withoutdistinctionastorace,colour,ornationalorethnicorigin,toequalitybeforethelaw,notablyintheenjoymentofthefollowingrights[…]therighttoeducationandtraining(UNGA,1965);

    • Article10oftheConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofDiscriminationAgainstWomen:StatesPartiesshalltakeallappropriatemeasurestoeliminatediscrimination

  • 11

    againstwomeninordertoensuretothemequalrightswithmeninthefieldofeducationandinparticulartoensure,onabasisofequalityofmenandwomen:(a)Thesameconditionsforcareerandvocationalguidance,foraccesstostudiesandfortheachievementofdiplomasineducationalestablishmentsofallcategoriesinruralaswellasinurbanareas;thisequalityshallbeensuredinpre-school,general,technical,professionalandhighertechnicaleducation,aswellasinalltypesofvocationaltraining(UNGA,1979);

    • Article14.2oftheConventionontheEliminationofAllFormsofDiscriminationAgainstWomen:StatesPartiesshalltakeallappropriatemeasurestoeliminatediscriminationagainstwomeninruralareasinordertoensure,onabasisofequalityofmenandwomen,thattheyparticipateinandbenefitfromruraldevelopmentand,inparticular,shallensuretosuchwomentheright…(d)Toobtainalltypesoftrainingandeducation,formalandnon-formal,includingthatrelatingtofunctionalliteracy,aswellas,interalia,thebenefitofallcommunityandextensionservices,inordertoincreasetheirtechnicalproficiency(UNGA,18December1979);

    1c.Refugees’highereducationenrolmentdata

    AccordingtotheUNHCR(2016b),only1%ofrefugeeshaveaccesstohighereducation.Thisstatistic

    wasfirstnotedinthe2016reportMissingOut:RefugeeEducationinCrisis.Whatistheevidencefor

    thisoften-citedrate?UNHCRutilisedtwotypesofdata:1) internaldatacollectedthroughcountry

    operations,atindividualrefugeeandhouseholdlevels;and2)externaldatafromUISstatistics,host

    governments and information gathered from NGOs and civil societies. UNHCR extrapolated the

    numbers to factor in situations where data collection was difficult and/or incomplete due to a

    numberofchallenges.9

    While on average only 1% of all refugees taken together worldwide have access to higher

    education,thereisvariationatthecountrylevel.Forexample,in2014,whileonlylessthan2%of

    SyrianrefugeeswereenrolledinTurkey,theywereashighas6%inLebanon,and8%inJordanand

    Egypt(Cremonini,Loriska&Safar,2015).

    9UNHCRhasindicatedthatgivenincreasedattentiononhighereducationandexpandedsupportprogrammesavailabletotheforciblydisplacedworldwideinrecentyears,itiscurrentlyengaginginadatareviewprocessandworkingwithresearchinstitutionstodetermineaccessandenrolmenttrends.

  • 12

    Figure 1. Percentage of Syrians enrolled in tertiary education in four MENA countries, 2014(Cremonini,Lorisika&Safar,2015)

    Tofurtherillustratethevariationinrefugees’highereducationenrolmentatcountrylevel,thissub-

    sectionexaminesenrolmentdataforoneselectedcountryineachoftheregionsofAfrica,Asiaand

    thePacific,Europe,MiddleEastandNorthAfrica (MENA),NorthAmericaandSouthAmerica.The

    countries(Ethiopia,Australia,Turkey,CanadaandBrazil)wereselectedfor:1)hostinglargenumbers

    ofrefugeesand2)havingreliableenrolmentdataavailable.10

    REGION:AFRICA

    Country example: Ethiopia

    Ethiopiaisthesecondlargestrefugee-hostingcountryinAfrica,secondonlytoKenya.Attheendof

    September2017, Ethiopiahosted883,546 refugeeswith99%originating from just four countries:

    Eritrea,Somalia,SudanandSouthSudan(UNHCR,2018b).

    In2016,approximately1,600refugeeswerestudyingindifferenthighereducationinstitutions(HEIs)

    acrossthecountry.Approximately1,300(81%)oftheserefugeesweresponsoredbytheEthiopian

    government and enrolled in state-owned universities. The German government-funded DAFI

    Scholarship Programme supported the remaining 300 students. In addition, 2,638 adult refugees

    10TheonlyexceptionisBrazil,whereenrolmentdatawasnotavailable.

    0 2 4 6 8

    10

    Egypt Jordan Lebanon Turkey

    Per

    cent

    age

    Enro

    lled

    Country

    Percentage of Syrians Enrolled in Tertiary Education in 4 MENA Countries (2014)

  • 13

    were enrolled in technical and vocational education and training (TVET)with another 9,672 adult

    refugeesenrolledinAdultFunctionalLiteracyandNumeracyprogrammes(UNHCR,2016b).

    REGION:MIDDLEEASTANDNORTHAFRICA

    Country example: Turkey

    There are over 2.9 million Syrian refugees registered in Turkey, by far the largest host of Syrian

    refugeesglobally(UNHCR,2017). In2011,earlyintheSyriancrisis, it isestimatedthattherewere

    about4,000Syrian studentsenrolled inTurkishuniversities.However, in the2015-2016Academic

    Year (AY) enrolmentmore than doubled to reach 10,000 students and increased again to 14,000

    students in the 2016 -17 AY (Yavcan& El-Ghali, 2017). The 2016 enrolment of Syrian refugees in

    Turkishhighereducationbydegreelevelshowsthatthemajoritywereenrolledinbachelor’sdegree

    programmesandseveralhundredwerecompletingtheirdoctoraldegrees(Table1).

    Table1.

    SyrianStudentsinTurkishHigherEducationbyDegreeLevel2016-2017

    Degreelevel NumberofStudentsEnroled

    AssociateDegrees 1,102

    BachelorDegrees 12,127

    MastersDegrees 1,067

    DoctoralDegrees 335

    Total 14,631

    Note.Reprintedfrom“HigherEducationandSyrianRefugeeStudents:TheCaseofTurkey”byYavcan,B.&El-Ghali,H.A.(2017),p.18.

    REGION:ASIAANDTHEPACIFICREGION

    Country example: Australia

    UsingdatafromtheDepartmentofEducationandTraining’sHigherEducationStatisticsCollection,a

    group of researchers at the University of Melbourne examined the 2009-2014 higher education

    enrolmentofstudentsfromrefugeebackgrounds(Terry,Naylor,Nguyen&Rizzo,2016).Theyfound

    that therewere3,506 studentswitha refugeebackgroundenrolled inAustralianHEIsasof2014.

    StudentswithrefugeebackgroundsinAustralianHEIsdoubledfrom2009-2014,withapproximately

  • 14

    73%undertakingfulltimestudies.Thedataalsoindicatedthatwhileahigherproportionofrefugee

    studentsweremen, therewas gender variation by country of origin. For instance,more female

    Iraqis of refugee backgrounds were enrolled thanmale Iraqis (176 versus 167) while there were

    nearlyequalnumbersoffemaleandmalestudentsfromIranenrolled(251femalesand252males).

    Bycontrast,372%moreSudanesemales(216)thanfemales(66)wereenrolled.

    REGION:EUROPE

    Country example: Germany

    Refugees in Germany are increasingly enrolling in university courses. A survey conducted by the

    German Rectors Conference (HRK), representing the heads of German universities among its

    memberinstitutions,showedthatatotalof1,140refugeeswereenrolledforstudiesin2017,which

    isfivetimesasmanywereinenrolledin2016.InAY2016,approximately12,000refugeesconsulted

    courseandcareerguidanceservices.In2017,thisnumberdoubledto24,000.Syriansmadeuptwo-

    thirds of prospective students, while the rest arrived from Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq (German

    Rectors’Conference,2017).

    The same survey found that approximately 5,700 refugees were enrolled in language and prep

    coursesinthewintertermofthe2016-17AY,anincreaseof80%fromthe2016summerterm.The

    GermanRectors Conference views this trend as a sign of the importance of scaffolding / support

    programmesduringdegreecourses,aswellaspre-studypreparationandcounselling.

    Interestingly,Germany’sFederalOfficeforMigrationandRefugeesreportedthataround13%ofall

    refugeesenrolledindegreeprogrammesin2016alreadyheldahighereducationdegree.11

    NORTHAMERICA

    Country example: Canada

    In Canada, the 2016 Canadian Census data shows that nearly one-third of refugees (31.5%) who

    received their permanent resident status upgraded their educational credentials. For those who

    arrivedasadults(18andolder)thisratewasabout22%,whichishigherthantheeconomicorfamily

    categoryof immigrants.However,whileadulteconomicimmigrantswhoupgradedtheireducation

    11 Entry into degree programmes are perhaps informed by the belief that a degree from the host countrywouldbemorevaluabletoenteringlabourmarketentry.

  • 15

    in Canada tended to complete a bachelor’s degree or higher, the vast majority of (71.1%) adult

    refugees inCanadacompleteda tradesorcollegediploma.This suggests that financial constraints

    and financial obligationsmay play a factor in decisions around the selection of higher education

    programmes(StatisticsCanada,2017).12

    SOUTHAMERICA

    Country example: Brazil

    SouthAmericancountrieshavebeenincreasinglyopeningtheirdoorstoresettlerefugeesoutsideof

    theirregion.OneofthemostvisibleinitiativeswastheresettlementofPalestinianrefugeesinChile

    andBrazilduring2007and2008(Ruiz,2015).

    BrazilisthelargestcountryinSouthAmericaandreceivesmorerefugeesthananyothercountryin

    theregion;asof2016,Brazilhostedabout2,100refugees.Bynationallaw,refugeeshaveaccessto

    healthcare,educationandtherighttowork.Althoughnationaldataonhighereducationenrolment

    ofrefugeesisnotyetavailable,in2017,weknowthatthereareinstitutionalinitiativestoincrease

    access and enrolment. For instance, the Federal University of SantaMaria launched an initiative

    focusedonvulnerablerefugeesandimmigrantswhohasrecentlyarrivedinBrazilbymakingiteasier

    accesstovocational,technologicalandhighereducationdegreesforthisgroup.

    Thissectionof thepaperhasarguedthat refugees’ inclusion inhighereducationholdsbenefitsat

    the individual level, and for host and home societies. It has also outlined that refugees’ rights to

    highereducationareenshrinedinnumerousinternationaldeclarations,resolutionsandconventions.

    A review of enrolment data and trends in selected countries in five regions has revealed wide

    variation.Nonetheless,globally,refugees’accesstohighereducationislow.Tounderstandtheirlow

    ratesofparticipation,thenextsectionconsidersthebarriersthatrefugeesfaceinaccessinghigher

    education.

    12ForthefirsttimeinCanada’shistory,the2016CensusincludedinformationontheadmissioncategoryofimmigrantstoCanada.Thethreeimmigrationstreamsare1.Economic:educatedandskilledimmigrants2.Family:toreunifyfamilies3.Humanitarian:toprovidehumanitarianandcompassionaterefuge.

  • 16

    PARTII:BARRIERSTOHIGHEREDUCATIONFORREFUGEES

    A brief overview of higher education admissions is essential to understand the access barriers

    refugees face. Until the 20th century, formal education, and particularly higher education, was

    largely inaccessible except to wealthy males.13 The shift from elite to mass higher education

    increased access to awider segment of society. At the same time,with industrialisation and the

    knowledge-basedeconomy,thepurposeofhighereducationalsoshiftedfromapurely intellectual

    andtheoreticalpursuittoonethathadvalue(humancapital)thatcouldbeexchangedinthelabour

    market (Tilak, 2008). With the massification of higher education, institutions in some countries

    turnedtotesting inthefinalyearofsecondaryschooltodetermineaptitudeforhighereducation.

    Overtheyears,institutionsalsobeganaddinginterviews,personalstatementsandadditionalcriteria

    todetermine‘goodfit’.14

    Inorder toaccess tohighereducation, refugees, likeotherapplicants,arerequiredtoundergoan

    admissions process to demonstrate their eligibility and aptitude for study. Although eligibility

    requirements vary widely by country and institution, in general, HEIs have the following

    requirementsforapplicants:

    • Proofofcitizenship,residenceorimmigrationstatus;• Documentationofsecondaryschoolleveleducationcompletion(suchasadiploma);• Transcriptsofsecondaryschoollevelcoursesandgradesachieved;• Passingscoresonsecondaryleavingexams;• Universityentryexams;• EvidenceofLanguageproficiencyinthelanguage(s)ofinstruction;• Scoresonaptitudetests(e.g.SwedishScholasticAptitudeTest);• FinancialAidorpaymentforms(indicatingabilitytopay/financialaidneeded).

    13Themassiveexpansionofhighereducationinthe20thand21stcenturieswasnearlyaglobalphenomenon,withdifferencesbyregionandcountry(Schofer&Meyer,2005).Forinstance,inEuropeitwasaprocessthatunfoldedduringmuchofthetwentiethcentury,whileinAfricathedemandforhighereducationescalateddramaticallyinthepost-colonialperiodofthe1960sand1970s.14Thisalsoservedtokeepthestatusquo(andlimitentrytocertaingroups).FormoreinformationreadKarabel,2005orGolden,2006.

  • 17

    2a.Missingqualificationsandevaluationofcredentials

    Thequalifications-relatedbarrierstorefugees’accesstohighereducationaretwo-fold.

    First, refugeesmaybewithoutanydocumentaryevidenceofprior learning (credentials).Withthe

    turbulent circumstances surrounding forced displacement, this is not surprising. Documents may

    alsobelostorstolenduringthemigrationroute,inreceptioncentresandrefugeecamps.

    Second, if refugees manage to flee with documentation, these credentials must be evaluated,

    recognisedand/orequalised.Recognitionofcredentialsisacomplexissue-theprocessneedstobe

    aligned with existing international and regional conventions, with recognition usually involving

    quality assurance of the original studies and determination of the validity of incomplete studies.

    Moreover,theevaluationandequalisationprocessrequireshumanandfinancialresourcesthatmay

    notbeinadequatesupplyinhostcountries(UNESCO,2015).

    Recognition and equalisation of credentials can prove to be especially difficult for refugees who

    arrive from conflict zoneswhere institutions are looted, destroyed and/or being used formilitary

    purposes.15

    Inaddition,whenexileisaresultofgovernment-inflictedpersecution,governmentsfromrefugees’

    countries of origins may be unwilling to offer support and substantiation of enrolment and

    credentials. Forexample,Watenpaugh,Fricke,andSiegel (2013) found that theSyrianEmbassy in

    Jordan, which was loyal to the Assad government, generally made their services unavailable to

    Syrianswhohadcrossed into JordanwithoutaSyrianexitpermit.Moreover,even ifgovernments

    are willing to provide information, if records were looted or destroyed, then the information no

    longerexistsinareliableform.

    15Forinstance,datafromtheGlobalCoalitiontoProtectEducationunderAttack(2018)finds:Widely-reporteddeadlyattackshaveoccurredinuniversitiesinPakistanandKenya,explosivesweresetatDhakaUniversityinBangladeshatleast35timesbetween2013and2015.

  • 18

    2b.Interruptededucation/gapsinlearning

    Withtheclosingofschoolsduringconflictand/orwithyearsspentinexile,refugeescansufferfrom

    interruptedschoolingandgapsinlearning.Manyrefugeesonlycompleteprimaryeducationorhave

    partial secondary education. This issue is especially pronouncedwhen it is considered by gender.

    UNHCRdata finds that refugee girls are less thanhalf as likely to enrol in secondary schools as

    males. This, of course, limits their opportunities to enter tertiary education. UNHCR (2018b)

    advocatesthateducation:

    …reducesgirls’vulnerabilitytoexploitation,sexualandgender-basedviolence,teenagepregnancy and child marriage. According to UNESCO (2014), if all girls completedprimaryschool,childmarriagewouldfallby14percent. If theyall finishedsecondaryschool, it would plummet by 64 per cent. For refugee girls and women facing theincreasedrisksthatcomewithforceddisplacement,educationisparticularlyimportant.

    Interruptededucationposesabarrier tohighereducation.First,a secondary schooldiploma is, in

    nearly all cases, required to enter tertiary education. Second, the gaps in learning must be

    addressed,prolongingthetimeittakestoenterorcompletehighereducation,addingcostandtime

    forbothrefugeesandinstitutions.Third,thosewithsignificantlearninggapsmayfeelfrustratedor

    unmotivatedduetorelatedtimeandcostissues.

    2c.Limitedlanguageproficiency

    Havinglittleornoproficiencyinthelanguage(s)ofinstructionisanotherbarriertohighereducation

    access. To demonstrate the scope of the issues, Table 2 lists the official languages of the five

    countrieswheremostrefugeesoriginateandtheofficiallanguagesofthefivecountriesthathostthe

    highestnumbersof refugees for2015.Except forArabic, there is littleoverlap in the languagesof

    countriesoforiginandthehostcountries.

    In Kenya,whichhosts approximately 486,000 refugeesmainly fleeing fromSomalia, South Sudan,

    Congo and Eritrea, proof of proficiency in English or Kiswahili, the languages of instruction in

    universitiesandcolleges,isrequired.InWestAfrica,GhanaandGuinearequireproficiencyinEnglish

    and French, respectively, for admission to universities, which partially explains English-speaking

    Liberianrefugees’higheraccesstoHEIsinGhanaascomparedtoinGuinea(Coffie,2014).

  • 19

    Table2.

    Languagesoftopfivecountriesoforiginsofrefugeesandtopfiverefugeehostingcountries(2015)

    InGermany, thecountryhosting themost refugees inEurope,proofof the languageat Level2 in

    Deutsche Sprachprüfung für den Hochschulzugang (DSH) or Level 4 in Test Deutsch als

    Fremdsprache(TDN)isaperquisiteforuniversityadmission.

    ToprefugeeCountriesofOrigin

    Language(s)ofCountryofOrigin TopRefugeeHosting

    CountriesLanguage(s)ofHostingCountry

    Syria Arabic is the official languagewith dialects Levantine in thewest and Mesopotamian in thenortheast. Kurmanji,avarietyofKurdish, is spoken in theKurdishregions.

    Turkey Turkish is theofficial language.Kurmanji (in the south east),Arabic and Zazaki are alsospoken.

    Afghanistan Pashto and Dari – are bothofficial and most widely spoken.The government has alsorecognised five other languagesfor their regional importance:Hazaragi, Uzbek, Turkmen,Balochi,andPashayi.

    Pakistan Urdu is the national languageand English is the officiallanguage.Inaddition,Punjabiisspoken in the province ofPunjab.Sindhiismainlyspokenin theprovinceof Sind.Pashtuis spoken in North-WestFrontier Province (NWFP) andBalochi: Mainly spoken in theprovinceofBaluchistan.

    Somalia SomaliandArabicaretheofficiallanguages.

    Lebanon Arabicisthenationallanguage,and French and English arewildlyspoken.

    Sudan Sudanese Arabic and along withthe tribal languages are spokenincludingNubian language in thefar north spoken by Nubians ofMahas,DongolaandHalfa.

    Iran Persian is the official languageand is spoken by 53% of thepopulation.

    Azerbaijani and other Turkicdialects, Kurdish, Gilaki andMazandarani, Luri, Arabic andBalochi2%arealsospoken.

    SouthSudan The official language is English.The indigenous languages withthe most speakers are Dinka,Nuer,Bari,andZande.

    Ethiopia

    Amharic (official), Oromo,Somali and Tigrinya are thewidelyspokenlanguages.

  • 20

    InItaly,Sweden,Austria,andFrance–countrieswithhighasylumclaimsinEurope–refugeesmust

    showproofofC1levellanguageproficiencyinItalian,Sweden,Austrian-GermanandFrenchaspart

    oftheadmissionsprocess.16Atthisadvancedproficiencylevel,oneshouldbeableto:

    • Understandawiderangeofmoredemanding,longertexts,andrecogniseimplicitmeaninginthem;

    • Expresshim/herselffluentlyandspontaneouslywithoutmuchobvioussearchingfortherightexpression;

    • Uselanguageflexiblyandeffectivelyforsocial,academicandprofessionalpurposes.He/shecanproduceclear,well-structured,detailedtextoncomplexsubjects,showingcorrectuseoforganisationalpatterns,connectorsandcohesivedevices(CEFR,2018;BritishCouncil,2018).

    Language also limits higher education access in an indirect manner. Language is essential for

    integrationandtothebuildingofsocialnetworks,whicharekeysourcesof informationaboutthe

    educationsysteminthehostcountry(Watkins,2012).

    2d.Informationbarrier

    Anotherbarrierfacedbyrefugeesisa lackofknowledgeorunderstandingofthehighereducation

    system in their host country. This can be exacerbated by a lack of availability of information and

    counselling services. This is particularly true for the 85% refugees in developing nations (UNHCR,

    2018b;Watenaughetal.,2013).

    WhilenumerousnewinitiativesmakeuseoftheInternettodisseminateinformationwidely,limited

    Internet access, particularly in rural settings and developing countries, represents a significant

    barriertothisapproach.Forexample,KirkandSherab(2016)reportthatonly2.5%ofSyrianyouth

    in Jordanhadaccessed the Jami3til Initiativeonlinedatabaseoffered inArabicbyUNESCO in July

    2015.CreaandSparnon(2017)alsofindthatlackofaccesstotechnologyandtheInternet,aswellas

    cultural and linguistic mismatches between Western-oriented online education and students’

    backgrounds, present hurdles to students attempting to access higher education in developing

    countries.

    16C1isthefifthlevelintheCommonEuropeanFrameworkofReference(CEFR).C2isconsideredfullmastery.

  • 21

    2e.Prohibitivecostofhighereducation

    The cost of higher education is a barrier to higher education access. Tuition fees vary widely by

    country, and by type of institution - such as public or private and/or diploma or degree granting

    institutions.Inthe2013/2014AY,EnglandandUnitedStates,withfeesof8,000USD/year,hadthe

    highesttuitionratesforpublictertiaryinstitutions(OECD,2016). Insomecountries,suchasBrazil,

    Denmark, and Finland, there are no tuition fees. However, the cost of higher education extends

    beyond tuition. The additional costs include studymaterials, health insurance and food over the

    periodofstudy.Thus,evenwhentherearenotuitionfees,therearestillothercoststoconsider.

    SelectedcountriestakenfromUNHCRdataonthe2017DAFIscholarshipcostsshowlargevariability

    inhighereducationcostsacrosssub-SaharanAfrica(seeTable3).WhileEthiopiahadascholarship

    costof685USD,Botswana’swas6,548USD.Ethiopia’sgovernmentsubsidisestuitionforrefugees,

    whileBotswana,asaresultofresourceconstraints,doesnotdoso(UNHCR,2018b).

    Table3.

    DAFIProgrammeinSub-SaharanAfrica(SelectedCountries)

    Country Female Male BudgetAvg.scholarship

    cost(USD)

    Benin 2 2 20,775 4,155

    Botswana 4 4 52,383 6,548

    Cameroon 45 105 329,966 2,200

    Chad 45 91 382,174 2,810

    Ethiopia 182 547 499,096 685

    Niger 1 8 42,653 4,739

    SouthAfrica 60 82 614,736 4,329

    Uganda 151 287 818,471 1,869Note.Adaptedfrom“TheOtherOnePerCent.RefugeeStudentsinHigherEducation:DAFIAnnualReport2017”byUNHCR(2018b),p.28.

    Tuitionfeesalsodifferwidelybystudents’residencystatus.Publicinstitutionsdifferentiatebetween

    lower ‘home fees’ for citizens and permanent residents and higher ‘international fees’ for other

    students.Certaincountrieswaivetuitionfeesforrefugees,whileothercountriesofferthehomefee

    tuitionrate,andothersconsiderrefugeesasinternationalstudents.Forexample,Watenpaughetal.

    (2013)foundthattheUniversityofJordan(apublicHEI)chargedrefugeesforeignstudentfeesthat

  • 22

    made the school nearly as expensive as private universities in Jordan. Meanwhile, Coffie (2014)

    foundthatrefugeesinGhanaianuniversitiespaidtuitionfeesthatwereapproximatelydoublethat

    ofdomesticstudents.17

    Notonlytheactualcost,buttheopportunitycostofhighereducationforrefugeesmustalsobe

    considered. Inaddition to thepotentialdebt, losingoutonearningsover the fouryearsof study,

    couldbeapricethatrefugeesconsidertoohightopayfortheremotebenefitsoffutureearnings.

    This is compounded by findings that show that many refugees feel an immense pressure to

    financially support their families and feel an urgency to work. Even those whomanage to enter

    higher education studies oftenwork part-time or even full-time, in order to send remittances to

    supportsiblings,parentsandotherswhoremaininrefugeorasylumcontexts(Ferede,2014).

    2f.Hostcountrylimitedresourcestoexpandhighereducationtorefugees

    Eighty-fivepercentofrefugeesarehostedindevelopingregions.Inmid-2017,refugeesfromSouth

    Sudan were hosted in the world’s least developed countries – including Sudan, Uganda, Kenya,

    DemocraticRepublicofCongo,TheCentralAfricanRepublic,andEthiopia(UNHCR,2018b).

    Developing countries that struggle to educate their own citizens with scarce resources can be

    overwhelmed.Theymaynothavethemeanstoabsorbrefugeesintheirhighereducationsystems.

    In many countries in the Global South hosting refugees, there are limited numbers of available

    institutions,facultyandresources(suchaslibrarybooks,computers,anddesks).

    Ofallcountries,Turkeyshelteredthegreatestnumberofrefugees,hosting3.5millionbymid-2017,

    followed by Pakistan (1.4 million), Lebanon (998,900), Iran (979,400), Germany (970,400),

    Bangladesh(932,200)andSudan(906,600).DatafromUNESCOInstituteofStatistics(UIS)identifies

    educationexpendituresinthetopfiverefugeehostingcountries(seeTable4).

    17Moreover,asylumseekerswhoarestillintheprocessofreceivingadecisionontheirasylumclaimareoftenconsideredtobeinternationalstudentsandwouldneedtopayinternationalfees.

  • 23

    Table4.

    PercentageofEducationExpenditureofTotalGovernmentSpendinginTopRefugeeHostingCountries(VariedYears)

    Hostcountry %EducationExpenditure

    Turkey 13.13(2014)

    Pakistan 12.5(2017)

    Lebanon 8.58(2013)

    Iran 19.3(2016)

    Germany 11.1(2014)

    Note:“%EducationExpenditure”reportedaspercentoftotalgovernmentspending,datafromUIS(2018).

    EducationspendingbypercentageofgovernmentexpenditureinPakistanislargerthaninGermany.

    However, the education budget of the country is smaller. Thus, when we look at spending per

    student at the tertiary level, Pakistan at (1,367.26 USD) spendsmuch less than Germany (17,148

    USD)(UIS,2018).

    2g.LegislativeChallenges

    Institutional ordinances and regulations can make it difficult for higher education institutions to

    provide access and support for refugees. For example, a 2016 survey conducted by the Swedish

    Council for Higher Education (2016) identified a variety of legislative and ordinance barriers as

    limitingandrestrictive18forrefugees’accesstohighereducationinSweden.Afewarenotedhere:

    1. Accessandeligibility

    o Language:Thereisarequirementofstep3Swedishforeligibility,eventhoughitmaynotbenecessaryforthesubject

    2. Tuitiono HigherEducationOrdinanceprohibitsasylum-seekers’righttoparticipateinfreehigher

    education

    3. Recognition/validationandpriorlearningo Therulesforpriorlearningareunclear

  • 24

    4. Lackofresources,contracteducation,otherformsoffunding

    o TherulesaboutwhichorganisationsmayfundeducationarerestrictiveOtherlegislationinthehostcountrycanexacerbatemanyofthebarriersrefugeesfaceinaccessing

    HEIs. For instance, laws that prevent refugees from working hinder their ability to finance their

    education.Inaddition,legislationthatrestrictsfreedomofentryandexitfromrefugeecampslimits

    refugees’ access to services to assist with application processes, and their ability to attend, if

    accepted(Coffie,2014;Watenaughetal.,2013;Zeus,2011).

    2h.Insecurityinhostcountries

    Insecure conditions of violent conflict, personal safety or authoritarian regimes in host countries

    represent a challenge to refugees’ access to higher education. Coffie (2014) found security

    constraints affecting refugees and nationals alike in Guinea to be the main factor resulting in

    Liberian refugees’more limited access to higher education in Guinea than in Ghana. In addition,

    DahyaandDryden-Peterson(2017)describehowsexualassaultagainstwomen inDadaabrefugee

    camp inNorthernKenyadecreasewomen’s freedomofmovement and, therefore, their ability to

    access higher education opportunities. Moreover, the 2007 DAFI report also cited ‘deteriorating

    situations’ in fiveWestAfricancountriesas the reason for closing theseDAFIprogrammes,as the

    opportunities for refugee students to attendHEIs ‘became almost inexistent’ (p. 25). Indeed, the

    DAFI policy and guidelines indicate that when UNHCR selects host countries to offer DAFI

    scholarships, theyconsider “anenvironmentofpolitical stability”among their criteria, stating, ‘an

    environment of political stability is a prerequisite for successful DAFI implementation’ (UNHCR,

    2009,p.11).

  • 25

    PARTIII:INCENTIVESANDPROGRAMMESThis section examines various initiatives that have been developed in order to address the

    challengesandbarrierstorefugees’accesstohighereducation.

    3a.Alternativecredentialevaluationschemes

    As indicated, missing education credentials and/or lack of proof of prior learning has a negative

    impacton refugees’ access tohigher education. Establishing a recognitionprocedure for refugees

    without suchdocumentation isessential, since it: 1)Providesamethod for institutions toensure

    thatapplicantsarequalified;2)Enablesrefugeesandthoseinrefugee-likesituationstoprovetheir

    competenciesandpreparednessforhighereducation.

    Internationalandregionalconventionsestablishvariousnations’commitmenttotherecognitionof

    qualifications,withspecificclausesthataddressthoseinrefugee-likesituations,including:

    • Article7oftheRevisedConventionontheRecognitionofQualificationsconcerningHigherEducationintheEuropeanRegion(CouncilofEurope,1997);

    • Article7oftheAsia-PacificRegionalConventionontheRecognitionofQualificationsinHigherEducation(UNESCO,2011);

    • ArticleIII.2,paragraph5,oftheRevisedConventionontheRecognitionofStudies,Certificates,Diplomas,DegreesandOtherAcademicQualificationsinHigherEducationinAfricanStates(UNESCO,12December2014);

    • TheDjiboutiDeclarationonRegionalConferenceonRefugeeEducationinIGADMemberStates(IntergovernmentalAuthorityonDevelopment,2017)andtheNairobiDeclaration(UNESCO,2018)inwhichAfricanStatescommittedtoestablishingcertificationrecognitionschemes,particularlyhighlightinginclusionofrefugeesandreturnees;

    • ThelaunchofUNESCO’sGlobalConventionprojectadvocatingforafairandjustevaluationprocessthatplacestheburdenofproofontherecognitionauthority,andaimstobuildtheevaluationcapacityofinstitutions.

    In addition to these conventions, organizations and higher education institutions worldwide are

    introducingalternativerecognitionprocedurestomaketheprocessmoresystematised,streamlined

    andconsistent.

  • 26

    InEurope,ENIC-NARIC19recommendsafairandtransparentevaluationprocessandhasalsosetup

    support for institutions that require assistancewith the credential evaluationprocess. Part of the

    additionalstepsinvalidatingpriorknowledgeinclude:

    • Examinationstoallowrefugeestodemonstrateknowledge,competenciesandskills;• Aninterviewwithacommitteeofexpertsforadditionalcontextualinformation;• Swornstatementsbyapplicants.

    The Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (NOKUT) has developed a two-step

    processtoalternativecredentialing.Thefirstphaseisthecreationofaneducationalportfoliowith

    supportingevidence.Thesecondincludesanevaluationinterview.NOKUTdevelopedthisprocessby

    firstconductingapilotin2004withOsloUniversityCollegeandNarvikUniversityCollegewherethey

    evaluated 20 candidates from Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, and the former Yugoslavia, all with

    engineeringbackgrounds.Outofthese20,fourcandidatesreceivedrecognitionoftheirdegreesas

    equivalent to a three-year Norwegian bachelor’s degree, 12 candidates received recognition as

    having one or two years of higher education, and four did not receive any recognition of higher

    education(Egner,2015).

    BasedonasuccessfulpilotofNOKUT’salternativequalificationsassessmentprocess,theCouncilof

    Europehas launched the EuropeanQualificationsPassport forRefugeesProject. Partners include

    UNHCR, the Greek Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs, the Italian Ministry of

    Education,UniversitiesandResearch, theConferenceofUniversityRectorsof Italy, theNorwegian

    Ministry of Education and Research, and qualification recognition centres in Armenia, Canada,

    France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway and theUK. The passport,while not legally

    binding,isastandardisedandstructureddocumentthatidentifiesskillsetsandqualificationsmeant

    toassistrefugeestoaccesshighereducationandemployment.

    19ENIC:EuropeanNetworkofInformationCentresintheEuropeanRegionNARIC:NationalAcademicRecognitionInformationCentresintheEuropeanUnion

  • 27

    3b.Hostlanguage-learninginitiatives

    Language proficiency is needed not only for successful integration into host societies but also to

    access educational opportunities. The following are a few examples of initiatives aimed at

    addressingthelanguagebarriertohighereducationaccess.

    Since2016, through itsERASMUS+programme, theEuropeanCommissionhas supported100,000

    refugeestoaccessOnlineLinguisticSupport(OLS).Itprovidestraininginavarietyoflanguagesand

    isfreeofcost.

    Babbel,aprivatecompany,providesonlinelanguagelessons.Since2016,ithaspartneredwiththe

    Senate of Berlin, Kiron Open Higher Education and Hoffnungsträger Foundation to facilitate

    language learning courses by providing €1million worth of language courses to various refugee-

    focused projects. Since the majority of refugees with whom they work have at least a basic

    knowledge of either English or French, the courses in German are actually provided in English or

    French,ratherthanArabic.Babbelalsotrainsvolunteerlanguageteachersforface-tofacelessonsat

    refugeecentres.

    Since 2015, the University of Grenoble has provided one-month trainings in French language to

    refugees and asylum seekers settled or accommodated in the region through its ‘Passerelle

    Solidarité’(SolidarityLink).Thisfour-monthtrainingisforrefugeesandasylumseekerswhowantto

    continuetheirstudiesinFranceandincludesFrenchclasses,Frenchcultureclassesandmethodology

    classes.ThetrainingisdesignedtohelpstudentsenterahighereducationprogrammeinGrenoble

    oranywhereelseinFrance.

    3c.Scholarshipschemes

    Scholarshipsaimtoaddressthecostofhighereducation.Sincethemajorityofrefugeesarehosted

    in developing countries, scholarship initiatives for this vulnerable group are part of achieving this

  • 28

    target.20 Scholarships either partially or fully address the cost of higher education by covering

    tuition,relatedcostsorboth.Ingeneral,scholarshipscanbegroupedunderfourcategories:

    1.SCHOLARSHIPSTHATTARGETREFUGEESINSIDECOUNTRYOFFIRSTASYLUM

    Thesescholarshipsareintendedforrefugeesstudyinginthecountryoffirstasylum.Assuch,nearly

    all of these scholarships are countries in the Global South, where the majority of refugees are

    hosted. Theoldest, andmostoftenusedmodel forother scholarshipsproviders, isUNHCR’sDAFI

    programme.

    DAFI Programme21

    For 25 years, UNHCR and the German Government have offered the Albert Einstein Deutsche

    AkademischeFlüchtlingsinitiative(DAFI)scholarshipprogramme,intendedtoassistrefugees’access

    to higher education. Since its launch in 1992, the DAFI programme has assisted 14,000 young

    refugees in 50 countries, the vastmajority ofwhich are in theGlobal South. In 2017 alone, the

    DAFI programme supported over 6,700 studentswho studied in 720 institutions (see Table 5 for

    detailsoftheDAFIprogrammefrom2015-2017).

    The DAFI programme awards scholarships through a selection process that begins with widely

    publicised calls for applications. In 2017, approximately 36% of applicants were shortlisted and

    interviewedbyamulti-partnerselectionpanel.Ofthose,60%wereofferedaDAFIscholarship.

    In 31 of the 50DAFI countries, refugees have the same access conditions as nationals such as in

    Botswana,Cameroon,Chad,Ecuador, the IslamicRepublicof Iran,Mozambique,Nigeria, Tanzania

    andZambia.UNHCRnegotiateswithgovernments forreducedfees forrefugeestudents, including

    DAFI scholars, as it has successfully done in Ethiopia, Rwanda, Sudan, and Yemen. Other times,

    20Thehighcostofhighereducation,particularlyaffectingyouthindevelopingcountries,isreceivingincreasedattentioninglobaleducationplanning.SDG4,target4.baimsto,by2020‘substantiallyexpandgloballythenumberofscholarshipsavailabletodevelopingcountries,inparticularleastdevelopedcountries,smallislanddevelopingStatesandAfricancountries,forenrolmentinhighereducation,includingvocationaltrainingandinformationandcommunicationstechnology,technical,engineeringandscientificprogrammes,indevelopedcountriesandotherdevelopingcountries.’21ThetextandtablearebasedonUNHCR’spublication,TheOtherOnePerCent.RefugeeStudentsinHigherEducation:DAFIAnnualReport2017.http://www.unhcr.org/publications/education/5bc4affc4/other-percent-refugee-students-higher-education-dafi-annual-report-2017.html

  • 29

    specific arrangements are made. For instance, in 2017 the UNHCR and the Ministry of Higher

    EducationinIraqagreedthatDAFIstudentsundertaking5-yearcourses, includingmedicine,would

    haveonetuition-freeyear.

    TheDAFIprogrammeextendsbeyondfinancialsupport.Thescholarshipschemecoverstuitionand

    related study costs such as accommodation, food, fees and subsistence allowances.Moreover, it

    includes remedial and language support and support to aid retention, such as psychosocial

    counselling.

    In2016,UNHCRandtheDAAD(GermanAcademicExchangeService)decidedtocooperateglobally

    tofacilitateaccessto,orcontinuationof,highereducationstudiesinthefiveSyriancrisiscountries

    Turkey,Lebanon,Jordan,IraqandEgypt.Doingso,thetwoorganisationslinkedtheresourcesoftwo

    projects:theDAFIprogrammewhichfocusesonbachelor’sdegreestudiesandtheHOPESprojectof

    theDAADwithitsconsortiumpartners,whichfocusesonmaster’sdegrees.

  • 30

    Table5.

    DAFIGlobaloverviewofdevelopments2015-2017

    Year 2015 2016 2017

    Numberofstudents 2,321 4,652 6,723

    Percentfemale 42% 44% 41%

    Graduated 364 449 547

    Newlyadmitted 678 2,718 2,582

    #countriesofstudy 40 37 50

    Top5countriesofstudy

    297Ethiopia232Iran187Uganda146Kenya143Pakistan

    825Turkey512Ethiopia428Iran358Lebanon293Egypt

    818Turkey729Ethiopia721Jordan490Pakistan438Uganda

    Top5countriesoforigin

    428Afghanistan

    363Somalia


    326SyrianArab
Republic


    277DRoftheCongo


    179Sudan


    1,790SyrianArab
Republic


    712Afghanistan


    454Somalia


    325DRoftheCongo


    311Sudan


    2,528SyrianArab
Republic


    942Afghanistan


    667Somalia


    475SouthSudan


    404Sudan


    Topfieldsofstudy 436Commercialand
Businessadministration

    373Medicalandhealth-
relatedscience

    247Socialand
behaviouralsciences

    206Engineering

    186Educationscience
andteachertraining

    845Medicalandhealth-relatedscience

    807Engineering

    800Commercialand
Businessadministration

    448Socialandbehaviouralsciences

    317Humanities

    1,271Medicaland
health-relatedscience

    1,217Commercialand
Businessadministration

    962Engineering


    780Socialand
behaviouralsciences

    542Humanities

  • 31

    2.SCHOLARSHIPSFORREFUGEESPROVIDEDBYHIGHEREDUCATIONINSTITUTIONS

    Many institutions support refugees directly. For instance, the UNHCR-Refugee Higher Education

    Program(RHEP)supportsrefugeesinJapantocompleteafour-yearundergraduatedegreeateight

    institutionsinthecountry.Students'tuitionfeesandotherstudyexpensesarefundeddirectlyby

    theuniversitieswhomayalsoofferadditionalstipends(UNHCR,2018b).

    3.SCHOLARSHIPSSUPPORTINGFEMALEREFUGEES

    In Australia, Claudette Elaro Refugee Women’s Scholarship accepts applications from female

    studentsofrefugeebackgroundslivinginAustraliaforfiveyearsorless.Thesewomenmustreside

    inNewSouthWales,andattendaninstitutionapprovedbySettlementServicesofAustralia.

    Anotherscholarshipforfemalestudents,butthatisviableworldwide,istheInternationalFederation

    of UniversityWomen’s Hegg Hoffet Fund for DisplacedWomen. It is offered to female graduate

    students(andinspecialcases,undergraduatefemales)whohavebeendisplacedasaresultofwar,

    political upheaval or other serious emergencies, including refugees. GWI’s Hegg Hoffet Fund also

    providesshort-termgrantsforrefreshercoursesforre-entryintothecandidates’professionalfield

    (or if that is not possible, training courses leading to some other employment), and for language

    trainingandothercoursestoassistwithintegrationintotheirnewcountries.Inadditiontofinancial

    assistance,GWI’snationalandlocalgroupsalsoproviderefugeeswithmoralsupporttohelpthem

    toadjusttolifeinadifferentcountry.

    4.SCHOLARSHIPSFORSYRIANREFUGEES

    Bymid-2015,overfourmillionSyriansfledthecountry.Manyscholarshipshavebeenestablishedto

    support Syrian refugees access higher education. For instance, the Institute of International

    Education(IIE)hascompliedaSyriaConsortiumforHigherEducationinCrisisthatlistshundredsof

    colleges and universities worldwide that provide scholarships specifically for Syrian students. In

    2016, the EU announced 400 scholarships for Syrian refugees and Japan has accepted 150 Syrian

    refugees to their schools (as exchange students). In Canada, universities have partnered with

    community-basednon-profitLifelineSyriatoraise27,000CADpertargetedrefugeefamily.Ryerson

    University alumni raised 4.5 million CAD through 102 sponsorships that will go on to help 150

    refugee families (Ryerson University, 2018). Many of the 80 public institutions in Canada offer

    similar initiatives. Furthermore, to increase accessibility to scholarship information, UNESCO

  • 32

    launched the Jami3ti Initiative (‘My University’ Initiative) in July 2015 (Kirk & Sherab, 2016). The

    Jami3ti InitiativeisanonlinedatabaseinArabicofscholarshipopportunitiesandresourcestohelp

    studentsbetterunderstandtheapplicationprocess.Thiswebsiteconsolidatesthewidelydispersed

    scholarship information into a single, searchable platform, proving invaluable to Syrian refugee

    studentswithapproximately2,000opportunitieslisted.

    SCHOLARSHIPCLEARINGHOUSES

    Toaidallrefugeeslocatescholarships,severalorganizationsalsoprovideclearinghousethatcompile

    opportunitiesforasylum-seekersandrefugees:

    UNHCRScholarshipPortal

    UNHCR’sTertiaryEducationteamlaunchedascholarshipportalofferingpracticaladvicefor

    prospectivestudentsandtechnicaladvicetoscholarship.

    TheRefugeeCenter

    TheRefugee Center offers listings of scholarships open to refugees and immigrants in theUnited

    States.

    EuropeanUniversityAssociation’sRefugeeWelcomeMap

    By January 2017, EUA Refugees Welcome Map had collected approximately 250 initiatives from

    highereducationinstitutionsandrelatedorganisationsin31countries.

    StudentActionforRefugees(STAR)

    STARlistsscholarshipsviableinhighereducationinstitutionsintheUnitedKingdom.

    VINCElist

    The VINCE list Includes scholarships with many other initiatives at integrating and supporting

    refugeesinavarietyofareas,includingwithhighereducation.

  • 33

    3d.Refugeepeer-to-peerinitiatives

    Peer-to-peerinitiativesrefertoprogrammesinwhichyouthworktosupportfellowyouthwhoare

    similartothem(e.g.countryorregionoforigin)toaccessorpersistinhighereducation.

    SYRIANYOUTHEMPOWERMENT

    In 2016, four Syrians in thediaspora founded Syrian Youth Empowerment (SYE) tohelpdisplaced

    Syrian students continue theirhighereducation.Theorganisationhasaworkingbudgetof12,700

    USD over two years with a grant from Blossom Hill Foundation and individual donations. The

    organisation supports displaced Syrian students bymentoring them through the institutional and

    scholarship application processes. Vetted mentors who are in or have completed their tertiary

    education serve asmentors. For the 2018-2019 Academic Year (AY), out of the 36 studentswho

    applied to enter universitywith support of SYEmentors, eightwere female.Of the 32whowere

    accepted,threedeferred.Outoftheremaining29,23receivedscholarships,whileoneispending(a

    differentcycleasatransferstudent).Forthe2018-2019AY,SYE-supportedstudentsreceived10.752

    MillionUSDinscholarships(4,032,000USDthefirstyearand6,720,000USDthesecondyear).The

    intendedmajorsofthe2018cohortarelistedinTable6.

    Table6.Majorsforthe2018-2019SYEEnteringClass

    Architecture/InternationalRelationsBehaviouralNeuroscienceChemistryCivilEngineeringComputerScienceComputerScience/Photography

    ComputerScience/TheoreticalphysicsComputerScience/ArtificialIntelligenceComputerScience/InformationTechnologyManagementEngineering/BusinessPhysicsPolitics/MarketingPre-medBiologySociologySoftwareEngineer/ComputerScience

  • 34

    3e.Onlineandblendedhighereducationforrefugees

    CONNECTEDLEARNINGINCRISISCONSORTIUM

    TheConnectedLearninginCrisisConsortium(CLCC)isanetworkofuniversities,NGOs,andblended

    learningprovidersthatcombinesonlineandface-to-faceinstructiontoofferlearningprogrammesto

    refugees in their home environments. By 2017 over 7,000 students had participated in the CLCC

    programmes(UNHCR,2018b).

    UNHCR and the CLCC have identified blended learning as important to bringing learning

    opportunitiestorefugeesandareworkingonunderstandinghowaccesstohighereducationcould

    be scaled up through online and blended learning especially in low-resource environments. The

    consortiumworks in part by identifying innovativemethods and disseminating good practices to

    meetthedemandforhighereducationforrefugees.

    Tothisend,theCLCChasdevelopedaQualityGuidelinesPlaybook thatprovidesrichresourceson

    the provision of connected learning, including case studies. The intention of this Playbook is to

    improve future programme designs and implementation by sharing knowledge of the types of

    blended learningprogrammesthatCLCCmembershave implementedsincetheearly2000s (CLCC,

    2017).

    Table7.

    ConnectedLearninginCrisisConsortiumMembers(2017)

    • AustralianCatholicUniversity• ArizonaStateUniversity• Centreity• INASP• InstituteforInternationalEducation• JesuitRefugeeService• JesuitWorldwideLearning• KenyattaUniversity• Kepler• Kiron• MIT• Mosaik

    • OpenUniversityUK• OpeningUniversityforRefugees• PurdueUniversity• SouthernNewHampshireUniversity• UNHCR• UniversityofBritishColumbia• UniversityofGeneva-InZone• UniversityofNairobi• University of Ottawa – Community

    MobilisationinCrisis• WorldUniversityServiceofCanada• YorkUniversity

  • 35

    BORDERLESSHIGHEREDUCATIONFORREFUGEES

    BorderlessHigherEducationforRefugees (BHER)Project isadevelopment initiativehousedat the

    CentreforRefugeeStudiesatYorkUniversitythatprovidesuniversityprogrammestorefugeesand

    localhoststudentsinDadaabKenyausingablendedlearningmodel.TheBHERconsortiumincludes

    fivepartners:KenyattaUniversity,MoiUniversity,UniversityofBritishColumbia,YorkUniversityand

    WindleInternationalKenya.

    In 2010-2012, the BHER model was designed through research grants from Social Sciences and

    HumanitiesResearchCouncilofCanadaandMasterCardFoundation.Sinceitslaunchin2013,ithas

    receivedfundingfromGlobalAffairsCanada,OpenSocietyFoundations,UNHCRKenyaandprivate

    donations.

    BHER coordinates with Canadian and Kenyan universities to offer internationally recognised and

    accreditedacademicprogrammesat the levelof certificate,diplomasanddegrees to refugeeand

    localpopulations;italsosupportsonsiteandonlineprogrammedeliverythroughtheBHERLearning

    Centre located in Dadaab. The delivery of one certificate and two diploma programmes are in

    teacher education at the primary and secondary level and six degree programmes in education,

    healthandliberalarts.

    Credit transfer among various university programmes allows for “stackable” credentials. Students

    are able to earn a certificate or diploma at each level of study, incrementally building towards

    earningadegree.Since2013,a totalof256students (56 female)havecompleted their certificate

    anddiploma studies in educationat theprimary and secondary level. Since September2016, 107

    studentsofCohort1haveengagedinoneofthefourundergraduatedegreesineducation,healthor

    geographyofferedbyYorkUniversity,KenyattaUniversityorMoiUniversity,with80nowretained.

    About 90%of these students (ofwhom19% arewomen) are on track to graduate by the end of

    2018.

    InSeptember2017,86studentsofCohort2startedstudiesinoneofthedegreeprogrammesinthe

    educationfieldofferedbyYorkUniversityorKenyattaUniversitywith77nowretained.About80%

    of these students (of whom 12% female) plan to graduate from one of the programmes by

    December 2019 after the completion of the current grant from the Government of Canada. The

  • 36

    genderbreakdownoftheprogrammeis36.7%femalesince1978andwas45%femaleforthe2017-

    2018AY.Theprogrammeisaimingfor50%femaleparticipationnextyear.

    KIRONOPENHIGHEREDUCATION

    Kiron Open Higher Education is a German-based non-profit organisation that has two strands of

    delivering courses. In one strand, refugees who lack documents or other requirements to enter

    higher education in their host country can take Kiron designed Massively Open Online Courses

    (MOOCs) on platforms such as Coursera, Edx, FUNorOpen Classrooms. Kiron calls these courses

    ‘micro credentials.’ In addition, Kiron includes language and preparatory courses to complete the

    onlinecourses.

    In the second strand, students who have the required documents and language to enter higher

    educationinstitutionsareabletoparticipate.Inthiscase,Kironprovidesapplicationsupportandthe

    transfer of 60 Kiron credits to the course of studywith partner universities. The programme also

    providesbuddyprogrammes,mentorship,counsellingandstudentguidance.In2017,Kironheldits

    pilotphaseofguidingstudentsthroughtheapplicationprocess.

    In2018,therewere3,200studentsonKironcampuses,with56universitypartnersineightcountries

    (see Table 8). Disciplines are limited to business, economics, computer science, mechanical

    engineering, social work and political science. Kiron is currently developing two study tracks for

    students in Jordan and Lebanon where they can transfer to partner universities to study for a

    bachelor’sdegreeincomputerscienceorbusiness&economics.

  • 37

    Table8.KironStudentDemographics(2018)NumberofStudents Total Male Female

    3,300 2,739(83%) 561(17%)Majors

    BusinessandEconomics 30.00% 28.73% 36.08%ComputerScience 36.74% 38.88% 26.46%MechanicalEngineering 9.15% 10.12% 4.64%PoliticalScience 10.51% 10.87% 8.93%SocialWork 13.60% 11.41% 23.88%

    CountryofResidence Germany 38.31%

    Turkey 12.71% Jordan 9.10% Indonesia 6.33% Kenya 5.70% France 5.67% Other 22.19%

    CountryofOrigin SyrianArabRepublic 41.43% Afghanistan 9.21% Somalia 6.06% Iraq 3.56% Sudan 3.56%Note.Databycountryoforiginandresidencebygenderwasnotmadeavailable.

    3f.Initiativessupportingacademicsinneedofrefuge

    Academicswhoareunder threathavealsobecomeakey concernofhighereducation.Beloware

    twoprogrammesthatsupportthispopulationgroup.Byprotectingacademicsfromregionsofcrisis,

    theseprogrammescanallowforHEIstoberestoredtofunctional levelswheninstructorsarelater

    abletoreturntotheirhomeinstitutions.SustainingandrestoringHEIsinconflict-affectedregionsis

    keytoensuringaccesstohighereducationforyouthwhoarecurrentlyrefugeesorasylumseekers

    (Barakat&Milton,2015).

  • 38

    SCHOLARSATRISK

    Scholars atRisk (SAR)beganat theUniversityofChicagoin1999and launched itsnetworkwitha

    majorinternationalconferenceinJune2000.SincethenScholarsatRiskhasprovidedsanctuaryand

    assistancetomorethan300academicseachyear.Itprotectsthesescholarsbyarrangingtemporary

    research and teaching positions at institutions in their network. A key advocate of academic

    freedom,italsoinvestigatesandspeaksoutagainstattacksonhighereducationcommunities.

    In2002,SARpartneredwithIIEandtheIIEScholarRescueFund.TheFundprovidedfellowshipsto

    SARscholarsfacinggravethreatssothattheymayescapedangerousconditionsandcontinuetheir

    academicworkinsafety.

    CARA

    Council for At-Risk Academics (CARA) is a UK based organisation that provides urgent support to

    academicsatrisk,thoseforcedintoexile,andthoseintheirhomecountrybutindanger.CARAisthe

    leadingorganisationdoingthisworkinEurope.Itisuniqueinitsfocusonhelpingthosewhoarestill

    in immediate danger, rather than already in exile, and in providing 2- or 3-year award packages,

    rather than short stipends. Funding is provided by a number of foundations, such as Harbour

    Foundation and the Murdoch charitable trust; the institutions also contribute in kind and offer

    servicesprobono.

    Over 115universities make up the CARA UK Universities Network, including Cardiff University,

    University of Cambridge, University of Essex, University of London, Glasgow School of Art, and

    UniversityofLiverpool.

    In 2006, CARA launched the Iraq Programme (2006-2011) through its office in Amman, Jordan. It

    undertookcooperationactivitiesdesignedtohelprebuildIraqiresearchandteachingcapacitiesby

    bringingacademics inIraqtogetherwiththoseinJordanandelsewhere,withtheircounterparts in

    theUK.

    In 2009, the Zimbabwe Programme became CARA’s second regional programme, created in

    responsetoan increaseofacademics fleeingZimbabwe,amidreportsofadramaticdecline inthe

    quality of higher education. The programme offered grants and fellowships to pay for vital

  • 39

    equipment and supplies, and in 2012 established a ‘Virtual Lecture Hall’ at the University of

    ZimbabwethatallowedZimbabweanacademicsinexileandotherstoconnectinrealtime.

    In2016CARA launched itsSyriaProgramme inorder toprovidesupport toacademicsaffectedby

    theSyriacrisiswithSyrianacademicsinexile,inTurkey,Lebanon.Inthe2016/17‘pilotphase’,with

    theactiveparticipationofUK,Turkishandotheruniversities,CARAorganisedworkshops inTurkey

    on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and Academic Skills Development (ASD), to lay the

    foundations for futureresearchcollaborations. The firstSyriaProgrammeFellowswerehostedby

    UK universities on short-term research visits, and UK and Syrian academics and others worked

    togetheronresearchtohelpestablishthetruestateofhighereducationinSyria,beforeandsince

    2011, togetabetter senseofhowexiledSyrianacademics couldbehelped toprepare to return,

    whenitissafetodoso.

    An 18-month second phase of the programmewas launched in late 2017 and includes EAP, ASD,

    Research IncubationVisits andaCARA-CommissionedResearchProject– supplementedby anew

    fifth strand, a research funding initiative.The aim of the CARA Syria Programme is to nurture

    importantdisciplineclusters,whileallowingSyriancolleaguestodevelopaninvaluableinternational

    resourceonwhichtodrawinthetaskofrebuildinghighereducation inSyria.Thesecondphase is

    funded primarily by a grant of 850,000 USD from the Open Society Foundations and its Higher

    EducationSupportProgram.

    3g.CapacitybuildinginitiativesoffacultyandstaffatHEIs

    Staffand facultyatHEIsalsorequirecapacitybuilding tounderstandhowtobestsupport refugee

    learners.Twosuchinitiativesthatfocusoninstitutionalactorsare:

    INHERE

    The Higher Education Supporting Refugees in Europe (InHere) project is another Erasmus +

    programme with the purpose of making access to European institutes of higher educationmore

    accessible for refugees and to help them integrate the host communities. The programme was

    implemented by the Union of Mediterranean Universities (UNIMED), in partnership with the

    European Universities Association (EUA), Campus France, the University of Barcelona and the

    UniversityofLaSapienza.

  • 40

    HIGHEREDUCATIONSUPPORTPROGRAM

    OpenSociety’sHigherEducationSupportProgramworkswithgranteesandpartnersinEurope,Asia,

    Africa,andtheMiddleEast,theHigherEducationSupportProgramsupportsinnovativeteachingand

    research, intellectual freedom, the expansion of marginalised groups’ access to higher education

    (includingrefugees),andgoodpracticesinuniversitygovernance.

    3h.Resettlementthroughhighereducation

    Resettlement into a third country through admission to higher education has gained interest in

    recent years. For instance, in 2017 the JICA-managed Japanese Initiative for the Future of Syrian

    Refugees(JISR)Programmeadmitted19refugeestudents(formaster’sdegreestudies)fromJordan

    and Lebanon into Japan higher education institutions. Since family members can accompany

    students,atotalof36personswereadmittedintoJapan.JISRaimstoaccept20studentsperyear

    from2017-2021.Theprogramme intends forstudents toreintegrate into theircountriesoforigin,

    butiftheyareunable,thereareopportunitiesforresettlement.

    EUROPEANRESETTLEMENTNETWORK

    Looking for new approaches to resettlement, the European Resettlement Network (ERN) has

    examined the feasibility of higher education and scholarships as a complementary pathway of

    refugeeadmissiontoEurope.22ERN’sminimumrecommendationsarethatinitiatives:

    A.Protectagainstrefoulement;

    B.Upholdtherighttoapplyforasylum;

    C. Do not jeopardise the safety and security of refugees by undermining their legalstatusandrights;

    D.Ensurethatparticipatingstudents’economicneedsaremetduringtheprogramme,includingprotectionagainsthardshipordestitution;

    22FormorereadEuropeanResettlementNetwork’s(2018),StudentScholarshipsforRefugees:ExpandingcomplementarypathwaysofadmissiontoEurope.http://www.resettlement.eu/sites/icmc/files/ERN%2B%20Student%20Scholarships%20for%20Refugees%20-%20Expanding%20complementary%20pathways%20of%20admission%20to%20Europe_0.pdf

  • 41

    E. Ensure that the programme does not adversely affect students’ psychological andsocial wellbeing and that access to health- and psycho-social care is provided forthosewhoneedit;

    F.Ensurestudentsarefullyawareandconsenttoalltherelevantdetailsregardingtheeffect on their rights and responsibilities of participation in the scholarshipprogramme, departure from the country of previous asylum, and stay in a newcountry;

    G.Ensuretherighttoremainlawfullyinthecountryofscholarshipbeyondtheperiodofstudyintheeventthatreturnorre-entrytothepreviouscountryofasylumortothe country of origin is not possible, including the possibility to convert refugees’visasintoworkorothervisatypes.

    (EuropeanResettlementNetwork,2018,p.37)

    LIFELINESYRIA

    In2015,inthecityofToronto,threeuniversities:UniversityofToronto,YorkUniversity,andOCAD

    University joined the Ryerson University-led Lifeline Syria Challenge to offer a response to the

    growinghumanitariancrisisinSyria.Sincethen,ithasgrownto248sponsoringgroups.

    Whenitlaunched,thisnetworkofToronto-baseduniversitieshadagoaltofacilitatethesponsorship

    ofover300SyrianrefugeesacrossCanada, throughtheCanadianPrivateSponsorshipofRefugees

    programme.Teamsofvolunteers,includingstudents,staff,faculty,alumniandcommunitymembers

    were motivated to raise funds and commit their time to support the refugee families upon

    arrival. This initiativehasenabled studentson campus tooffer their skills andknowledge tohelp

    facilitate the integration of these resettled families by developing an online portal to share

    information and delivering workshops for families on relevant topics. A number of additional

    initiatives at these institutions have taken shape, providing opportunities to engagemore of the

    Canadianpublic inthewelcomingofformerrefugees,ontheirpathwaytointegrationintheirnew

    communities.

    In 2018, Lifeline Syria has sponsored 1,074 Syrians through 248 Private SponsorGroups andwith

    8,060,600CADinsponsorshipfunds(RyersonUniversity,2018).

  • 42

    CASESTUDY:WUSCSTUDENTREFUGEEPROGRAMMEDrawing on an original data, this case study outlines how it is possible not only to offer higher

    educationaccesstorefugeesbuttoalsoofferapathwaytoresettlementandintegration.23

    Since1978,Canada’sWorldUniversityServiceofCanada(WUSC)StudentRefugeeProgramme(SRP)

    has resettled over 1,800 refugees from 39 countries of origin into over 80 college and university

    campuses. This initiative is described in depth below, as it demonstrates how a programme

    supportingrefugees’accesstohighereducationcanutiliseseveralofthestrategiesdescribedinthis

    section: host language learning, scholarship schemes, capacity building for higher education

    institutions,peer-to-peerinitiatives,andresettlementthroughhighereducation.

    TheSRPisprimarilyastudent-drivenendeavourmobilisedbygroupsofstudents,faculty,andstaff

    on local university campuses across Canada. Students at Canadian higher education institutions

    actively sponsor refugee students through Local Committees / Constituent Groups. These

    committeesraise fundsandawareness fortheprogram,engageotherstudents,holdreferendums

    throughStudentUnionsandprovidetheday-to-daysocialandacademicsupporttoSRPstudents.

    WUSC is able to do this work because of Canada’s Private Refugee Sponsorship Program under

    whichseveralgroupsmaysponsorrefugees.OneofthesegroupsisSponsorshipAgreementHolders

    (SAH) - incorporated humanitarian, religious, ethnic, community or service organisations with a

    specialaffiliationandcontractwiththeMinistryofCitizenshipandImmigrationCanadatosponsor

    refugees. Since 1981, WUSC, as a humanitarian organisation, has been one of about 80 such

    Sponsorship Agreement Holders who are permitted to sponsor refugees in various local

    communities through the use of Constituent Groups.24 WUSC SRP currently accepts applications

    fromrefugeesinJordan,Kenya,Lebanon,andMalawi.

    23Theinformationinthiscasestudyisadaptedfromalongeranalysis(Ferede,2013)

    24InthecaseofWUSC,LocalCommitteesatuniversitiesandcollegesactasitsConstituentGroups,allowingthemtosponsorrefugeesontotheircampuscommunities.Likeotherprivatesponsors,WUSCagreestoberesponsibleforprovidingfinancialandresettlementsupportfortherefugee’sfirstyearinCanada.Ingeneral,theamountoffinancialsupportthatsponsoringgroupsarerequiredtoprovideapproximateslocalsocialassistanceratelevelsthatvarybyregion,byfamilysizeandageofdependents.

  • 43

    A2013studyfoundthatthebenefitsforrefugeeyouthincludefindingawayoutofdifficultrefugee

    campconditions,havingaccess tohighereducation,developingskills towardsacareerandhaving

    the opportunity to become a Canadian citizen (Ferede, 2014). An internal 2007 evaluation report

    found that sponsored students also become civically engaged, support development in the home

    regions,andtendtojoinsocietygroupsandassociations(WUSC,2007a).

    Theprogram’s benefits also extend toCanadian youth.Volunteers tended to vote at higher rates

    than the Canadian average and be more politically engaged. They also reported developing

    communication,mentoring, andnegotiating skills becauseof their involvement in SRP.Moreover,

    teachers in refugee camps indicated that the program had a positive impact on high school

    graduationssincestudentspersistedinthehopesofapost-secondaryeducationandeligibilityinto

    thehighlycompetitiveWUSCprogram.

    Process of Bringing the Student Refugee Program to a Canadian Campus

    IttakesapproximatelytwoyearsofplanningandfundraisingforaLocalCommitteetoadvancefrom

    expressinginterestinsponsoringarefugeetohavingthemarriveontheircampus.Fromtheonset,

    WUSCheadofficesupportsLocalCommittees intheirsponsorshipeffortsbyprovidingprocedural,

    promotionalandfundraisingguidancethroughbookletsandpostedonlinetextandvideoresources.

    During this planningphase, students are strongly advised to involve faculty or staff as advisors in

    order to ‘ensure long-term sustainability’. In addition, Local Committees need to also engage and

    developstrongrelationshipswithvariousuniversitydepartmentsandoffices,suchastheAdmissions

    Office, President’s Office, International Student’s Office and the Students’ Union. During the

    implementationphase,theseofficesplayakeyroleintheadmissionsprocessofrefugeeapplicants,

    in facilitating institutional waivers on tuition and housing and providing assistance with

    documentation.Sincethesupportofinstitutionalleadershipandstaffiscrucialtothesuccessofthe

    program on a particular campus, Local Committees spend initial conversations explaining the

    program,gauginginterestandbuildingtrust.Iftheyhaveuniversitysupport,LocalCommitteesthen

    conductcampus-wideandcommunityawarenesseventstopromotetheplightofrefugeesandthe

    significanceoftheprogram.

  • 44

    LocalCommitteesareresponsible forraisingthefundsneededforthesponsorshipofonerefugee

    student for a minimum of 12 months. Using a sample budget set by WUSC as a guideline

    (approximately 20,000 - 30,000 CAD per refugee student), Local Committeemembers first assess

    their financial capacity before developing a fundraising strategy. This usually includes holding

    referendumsthroughtheStudentUnionwherethestudentbodyvotesonproposedtuitionlevies–

    mandatory fees - that will go toward the cost of sponsorship. Sometimes, pending on faculty

    support, members can also make an appeal for faculty levies or payroll deductions. Successful

    acquisition ofwaivers on tuition, residence,meal plans, and textbooks through various university

    offices, can reduce the overall cost. Committees may also approach off-campus individuals,

    businesses,andorganisationsforcashorin-kinddonationstowarditemssuchasclothes,bicyclesor

    computersforthesponsoredstudent.Finally,afterraisingawareness,engagingtherequiredparties,

    andsecuringthenecessaryfunding,thecampusLocalCommitteeisreadytosubmitasponsorship

    plantoWUSC.

    Theprogrammehas tremendous variationat the institution level. Someuniversities are seasoned

    sponsors, while others are new. For instance, Local Committees at University of Alberta have

    sponsored students since 1988. Meanwhile, the first refugee student was not sponsored onto

    University of Ontario’s Institute of Technology until 2012. Tuition levy support also differs

    significantly.Data from2010-2011 indicatesaper-student levyof15.00CADatAlgomaUniversity

    but1.00CADatMcGillUniversity.Yetbecauseofthelargedifferenceinthenumberofstudentswho

    attend these institutions, Algoma’s Local Committee raised 15,145 CAD from levies while McGill

    raised30,000CAD.ThemajorityofLocalCommitteessponsoronestudentperyear.Others,suchas

    those at theUniversity of British Columbia and Dalhousie, sponsormultiple students annually. In

    addition,most refugeeyouthare financially supported for12-months,while thoseatahandfulof

    institutions,suchasSimonFraserandWilfredLaurier,aresupportedovermultipleyears.According

    toSeniorProgramOfficers,strongsupportfromuniversityleadershipandLocalCommittees’success

    withsecuringsustainablefunding,accountforthesedifferences.

    The Selection, Admission, and Arrival of Refugee Students

    The majority of the 1,216 youth sponsored from WUSC from 1978-2011 originate from African

    countries (over 85%). Surges in the countries of origin of sponsored students tend to correspond