fairview addition - contingency plan implementation case study

27
Fairview Addition ¾ Mining history has affected land use planning & incentives for redevelopment ¾ “Historical Use & Development” does not always lead to identification of releases ¾ Fairview Addition in Virginia is an example of using contingency plans as integral parts of the assessment/investigation process Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Upload: others

Post on 28-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Fairview Addition

Mining history has affected land use planning & incentives for redevelopment“Historical Use & Development” does not always lead to identification of releasesFairview Addition in Virginia is an example of using contingency plans as integral parts of the assessment/investigation process

Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Page 2: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Many of the cities are located within or

adjacent to the ore body.

Page 3: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

City of Virginia - Population Trends

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005

Year

Pop

ulat

ion

Changes in mining and a down-turn in the industry starting in the 1980s has lead to:

Decreasing populationVery little investment in new housing or redevelopmentAn economy struggling to diversify

Page 4: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 5: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

To facilitate economic development, Virginia began a deliberate effort to acquire lands and make them available for commercial and residential development.

BUT………

These lands had a history.

Page 6: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 7: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 8: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 9: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 10: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 11: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 12: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 13: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 14: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 15: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 16: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 17: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 18: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 19: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study
Page 20: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Important Points Regarding The Pre-Taconite History

Activities and infrastructure around the pit rim were distinct from those within the pit

Even land around the pit rim was highly disturbed

Infrastructure was transient If no record of a structure or activity was found does not mean it did not exist

Page 21: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Potential Contaminants from Historical Mining Activities

Activity Potential Contaminants Coal Fired Boilers Metals/PAH

Headframes/Motor Houses DRO/VOC/Metals/PAH/PCB Electric

Generation/transformers/substations DRO/PCB/VOC

Railroad DRO/PCB/PAH/Metals Locomotive Service DRO/PCB/PAH/Metals/VOC

Heavy Equipment Service DRO/GRO/VOC/Pb Millwright/Fabrication Metals/VOC

Paint Shop Metals/VOC Electrical Shop PCB/VOC

Panel Yards Creosote/As/DBCP (?) Fueling Stations DRO/GRO/VOC

Wash Plants DRO/GRO/VOC/Metals/PCB

Page 22: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Phase I on Fairview Begins1995

Phase I ESA included a typical historical search which discussed the proximity to the pit rim

The only historical uses which were located by the Phase I were employee gardens and a city plat with utility extensions

The REC were former RR corridor and unknown fill

Page 23: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Phase IIThe Phase II consisted of 8 test pits and sampling for DRO/PAH/Metals

One fuel oil release was identified, approximately 20 yd3 soil was excavated and the City completed the purchase with their Phase I, Phase II and closure letter in hand.

A much different release was identified during the first day of grading and the City enrolled in the VIC Program.

Page 24: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Highlights of the first VIC Work on Phase 2

About 800 Yd3 soil (DRO/TCB/DBCP) were excavatedA Certificate of Completion incorporated a CP which required sampling and analysis during

future gradingutility construction andeach building excavation

Historical “Data Gaps” were researchedVirginia Historical Society archivesIron World archivesMine inspector recordsOliver Mining (US Steel) archivesCity archivesOld Timer interviews

The REC were still the RR and fill

Page 25: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Highlights of EPA Brownfield Pilot Assessment on Phase 3

The Phase II identified an Arsenic release and a fuel oil releaseA No Further Action incorporated a CP that required

Excavation of the releases during gradingSampling and analysis during grading, utility construction and each building excavation

Public meetings specifically sought historical use and development information from residentsThe only REC that were identified were

RR corridor andunknown fill

Page 26: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Release Summary

DRO1002007Exc#6

DRO/GRO8002007Exc#5

As842007Exc#4

DRO/TCB/PCB

19402007Exc #3

DRO/TCB/DBCP/PCB

8001998Exc#2

DRO201995Exc #1

COCVolumeDateExc

Page 27: Fairview Addition - Contingency Plan Implementation Case Study

Fairview Addition

What we have learned about redeveloping old mine land:Historical use and development is important but may not lead to spots on the map for Phase II InvestigationCPs work but the developer and contractors must be fully involvedMust consider a large list of potential contaminants