factors determining the price of used mid-compact size vehicles
DESCRIPTION
Factors Determining the Price Of Used Mid-Compact Size Vehicles. Team 4. INTRODUCTION. Used least squares regression analysis to determine the factors that affect mid-compact size vehicle price. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Factors Determining the Factors Determining the Price Of Used Mid-Compact Price Of Used Mid-Compact
Size VehiclesSize Vehicles
Team 4Team 4
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
Used least squares regression analysis to Used least squares regression analysis to determine the factors that affect mid-compact determine the factors that affect mid-compact size vehicle price.size vehicle price.
By determining these factors manufacturers, By determining these factors manufacturers, dealerships, rental agencies, and consumers dealerships, rental agencies, and consumers can incorporate these economic indicators into can incorporate these economic indicators into their decision making processes and operationstheir decision making processes and operations
What?
Why?
Identified and defined dependent variable Identified and defined dependent variable (Price of Mid-Compact Size Cars) (Price of Mid-Compact Size Cars)Collected sufficient data on potential Collected sufficient data on potential indicators/independent variablesindicators/independent variablesDeveloped regression model by Developed regression model by considering different model types and considering different model types and variable interactionsvariable interactionsDiagnosed and refined model taking into Diagnosed and refined model taking into consideration performance parametersconsideration performance parameters
How?
Independent VariablesIndependent Variables
SupplySupply - - Used cars available in a particular monthUsed cars available in a particular month FleetFleet - Percentage of supply of vehicles sold to public - Percentage of supply of vehicles sold to public
agencies (police department, government offices)agencies (police department, government offices) LeaseLease - Percentage of total supply of cars leased.- Percentage of total supply of cars leased. IncentivesIncentives - Rebates, APR, etc. dollar value($) - Rebates, APR, etc. dollar value($) PIPI - - MonthlyMonthly National Personal Income in National Personal Income in
Billions of dollarsBillions of dollars MonthMonth - - Month in which Price was recorded. Month in which Price was recorded. YearYear - -Year in which Price was recorded.Year in which Price was recorded.
Single Variable RegressionsSingle Variable Regressions
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Supply
Pri
ce
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Fleet
Pri
ce
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
Lease
Pri
ce
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Incentive
Pri
ce
Y=.0557x+6046.7 R^2=.1743 Y=-4031.1x+7730.3 R^2=.3143
Y=4850.4.4x+6088.3 R^2=.2421 Y=-.7584x+7895.1 R^2=.3742
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Month
Pri
ce
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Model year
Pri
ce
Y=-69.184x+7326
R^2=.0491
Y=-98.334x+7136.3
R^2=.0163
PRICE SUPPLY MONTH YEAR LEASE INCENTIVE FLEET
PRICE 1.0000 0.4175 -0.2216 -0.1278 0.4921 -0.6117 -0.5606
SUPPLY 0.4175 1.0000 -0.1115 0.0869 -0.0825 -0.4844 -0.3933
MONTH -0.2216 -0.1115 1.0000 -0.2223 -0.0368 0.1127 -0.1625
YEAR -0.1278 0.0869 -0.2223 1.0000 -0.1179 0.0332 0.0661
LEASE 0.4921 -0.0825 -0.0368 -0.1179 1.0000 -0.0422 -0.1142
INCENTIVE -0.6117 -0.4844 0.1127 0.0332 -0.0422 1.0000 0.5116
FLEET -0.5606 -0.3933 -0.1625 0.0661 -0.1142 0.5116 1.0000
Correlation MatrixCorrelation Matrix
By looking at the Correlation Matrix we see some fairly high By looking at the Correlation Matrix we see some fairly high correlations between independent variables and that indicates a correlations between independent variables and that indicates a potential problem with multicollinearitypotential problem with multicollinearity
Developing ModelsDeveloping Models (EQ 1) (EQ 1)
R-squared 0.7221 Mean dependent var 6833.9815
Adjusted R-squared 0.7068 S.D. dependent var 1028.1981
S.E. of regression 556.7549 Akaike info criterion 15.5396
Sum squared resid 39366959.4514 Schwarz criterion 15.7117
Log likelihood -1040.9202 F-statistic 47.1450
Durbin-Watson stat 0.6384 Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
SUPPLY 0.0200 0.0075 2.6817 0.0083
FLEET -2146.8892 425.2621 -5.0484 0.0000
INCENTIVE -0.4330 0.0761 -5.6936 0.0000
LEASE 4240.7041 474.7231 8.9330 0.0000
MONTH -96.6401 25.9345 -3.7263 0.0003
YEAR -458.4911 297.1605 -1.5429 0.1253
PI 0.8325 0.6548 1.2714 0.2059
C 2494.8234 4111.2844 0.6068 0.5451
Developing ModelsDeveloping Models (EQ 2) (EQ 2)Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
SUPPLY 0.0208 0.0075 2.7853 0.0062
FLEET -2231.5649 421.0242 -5.3003 0.0000
INCENTIVE -0.4093 0.0739 -5.5381 0.0000
LEASE 4281.7972 474.7604 9.0189 0.0000
MONTH -70.4489 15.7922 -4.4610 0.0000
YEAR -83.7062 37.5382 -2.2299 0.0275
C 7709.2045 285.1369 27.0369 0.0000
R-squared 0.7186 Mean dependent var 6833.9815
Adjusted R-squared 0.7054 S.D. dependent var 1028.1981
S.E. of regression 558.0938 Akaike info criterion 15.5374
Sum squared resid 39867988.1607 Schwarz criterion 15.6880
Log likelihood -1041.7738 F-statistic 54.4708
Durbin-Watson stat 0.6253 Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000
Testing Variable InteractionsTesting Variable Interactions
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000
Year*Supply
pri
ce
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Incentive*Fleet
Pri
ce
Price Vs Year*Supply
Price Vs Incentive*Fleet
Y=.0071x+6517.7
R^2=.0548
Y=-1.8835x+7533.3
R^2=.3377
Developing ModelsDeveloping Models (EQ 3) (EQ 3)Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
SUPPLY -0.0680 0.0158 -4.2942 0.0000
MONTH -66.2268 13.9278 -4.7550 0.0000
YEAR -477.4664 71.9577 -6.6354 0.0000
LEASE 5719.1001 478.8719 11.9429 0.0000
INCENTIVE -0.4027 0.0651 -6.1848 0.0000
FLEET -2100.0570 371.4849 -5.6531 0.0000
YEAR*SUPPLY 0.0289 0.0047 6.1611 0.0000
C 8602.7106 290.0318 29.6613 0.0000
R-squared 0.783333561 Mean dependent var 6833.981481
Adjusted R-squared 0.771391317 S.D. dependent var 1028.198109
S.E. of regression 491.6127776 Akaike info criterion 15.29069057
Sum squared resid 30693756.64 Schwarz criterion 15.462855
Log likelihood -1024.121613 F-statistic 65.59349469
Durbin-Watson stat 0.867002592 Prob(F-statistic) 0
Final ModelFinal ModelVariable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
SUPPLY -0.0642 0.0145 -4.4258 0.0000
MONTH -57.8940 12.8331 -4.5113 0.0000
YEAR -498.9848 65.8981 -7.5721 0.0000
LEASE 5495.1686 439.8410 12.4935 0.0000
INCENTIVE -0.9477 0.1222 -7.7527 0.0000
FLEET -4523.0306 583.6174 -7.7500 0.0000
YEAR*SUPPLY 0.0284 0.0043 6.6105 0.0000
INCENTIVE*FLEET 2.3145 0.4534 5.1042 0.0000
C 9055.9077 279.5399 32.3958 0.0000
R-squared 0.8205 Mean dependent var 6833.9815
Adjusted R-squared 0.8091 S.D. dependent var 1028.1981
S.E. of regression 449.2916 Akaike info criterion 15.1176
Sum squared resid 25434734.6948 Schwarz criterion 15.3112
Log likelihood -1011.4354 F-statistic 71.9727
Durbin-Watson stat 0.9421 Prob(F-statistic) 0.0000
DiagnosticsDiagnostics
Residuals Vs predicted
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Predicted
Re
sid
ua
ls
Residuals VS Time
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133
Time
Res
idua
lsSeries1
Series2
Final EquationFinal EquationPRICE = -0.06417398414*SUPPLY - 57.89403046*MONTH - 498.984817*YEAR + 5495.168601*LEASE - 0.9477265548*INCENTIVE - 4523.030592*FLEET + 0.02838232606*(YEAR*SUPPLY) + 2.314465082*(INCENTIVE*FLEET) + 9055.90772
dPrice/dSupply= -.064+.028(Year)
dPrice/dMonth= -57.89
dPrice/dYear= -498.98 + .028(Supply)
dPrice/dLease= 5495.17
dPrice/dIncentive= -.9477+2.31(Fleet)
dPrice/dFleet= -4523.03+2.31(Incentive)
ConclusionsConclusions
The month and lease % variables have the The month and lease % variables have the most significant impact on price.most significant impact on price.The effect of incentives on price cannot be The effect of incentives on price cannot be considered without looking at fleet %considered without looking at fleet %The effect of supply on price also cannot The effect of supply on price also cannot be considered without looking at yearbe considered without looking at yearAn informed buyer or seller of mid-An informed buyer or seller of mid-compact sized vehicles should consider compact sized vehicles should consider these implications before actingthese implications before acting