facilities master plan - university of kansas facilities master plan is designed to facilitate ......

University of Kansas Medical Center Facilities Master Plan February 2012

University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas City, Kansas

Facilities Master PlanFebruary 2012


Acknowledgments

1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Existing ConditionsOverview

KUMC Campus

3.0 AnalysisGrowth Projections Summary

Classroom

Research

Office

4.0 Master PlanOverview

Highest & Best Use

2020 and Beyond

5.0 Phase I Medical Education

Building Program

Cost Estimate

6.0 Appendix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3

4-15

16-26

27-32

33-53

54-60

61-80


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Barbara Atkinson, Exec. Vice Chancellor and Executive Dean, KUMC

Heidi Chumley, Assoc. Vice Chancellor for Educ. Resources, KUMC

Shelley Gebar, Sr. Assoc. Dean for Operations and Admin., KUMC

Doug Girod, Senior Associate Dean, KUMC

Theresa Gordzica, Chief Financial Officer, KU

Jon Jackson, Senior VP & Chief Administrative Officer, TUKH

CJ Janovy, Director of Communications, KUMC

Rick Johnson, Associate Vice Chancellor and Chief of Police, KUMC

Kim Meyer, Senior Associate Dean for Finance, KUMC

Karen Miller, Senior Vice Chancellor, KUMC

Don Rau, Director of Facilities Management, KUMC

Dave Roland, Associate Director Facilities Management, KUMC

Steve Smallwood, Associate Director Facilities Management, KUMC

Paul Terranova, Vice Chancellor for Research, KUMC

Steffani Webb, Vice Chancellor for Administration, KUMC

3

Special acknowledgements go to all who gave generously of their time and dedication to aid in the development of theFacilities Master Plan.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0

EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.0

ANALYSIS 3.0

MASTER PLAN 4.0

NEW MEDICAL EDUCATION BUILDING 5.0

APPENDIX 6.0


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FOREWORD

The University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) is an agency of The University of Kansas. KUMC is a

leading institution with facilities in Kansas City and throughout the state which house four schools:

School of Medicine

School of Nursing

School of Health Professions

School of Public Health

As the region’s premier academic medical center, The University of Kansas Medical Center promotes

multidisciplinary collaboration on-site, sharing a campus with The University of Kansas Hospital and The

University of Kansas Physicians. The co-location of people and resources affords a synergy between

institutions, and allows KUMC to excel in fulfilling its Education, Research, Clinical, and Community

Engagement missions.

5

clinical

education

research

community engagement


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

KUMC STRATEGIC PLANNINGIn early 2011, The University of Kansas Medical Center communityembarked on an intensive strategic planning effort. The Schools ofNursing, Medicine, Health Professions, and Public Health completedStrategic Maps to identify goals and outline steps to achieve theiraspirations. The Strategic Plan formed the background for this FacilitiesMaster Plan. The Facilities Master Plan is designed to facilitateimplementation of Strategic Plan objectives.

6


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PROCESS

In mid 2011, Kansas University Medical Center (KUMC) engaged Cannon

Design, an international architectural planning and design firm specializing

in higher education, to develop a Facilities Master Plan for the Kansas City

campus. The objective was to provide KUMC with a long-range,

comprehensive vision for the growth, development and improvement of

facilities and campus amenities to accommodate education, research,

clinical and community engagement program needs, both current and

future. An additional component of the project is a Phase One Project

Definition of a new Medical Education Building including a preliminary

Program of Spaces, conceptual cost estimates, and conceptual drawings.

The Master Plan was created over a six month time period through an

interactive process among Cannon Design, the EVC Leadership, facilities,

utilities, parking & transportation work groups, and representatives from

Research, the School of Medicine, School of Nursing, and School of Health

Professions. With these stakeholders the potential concepts and scope

of this project were defined, created, and verified.

7

2011 2012Master Plan Process Schedule


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PLANNING TEAM PARTICIPANTS - KUMC

8


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9

GUIDING PRINCIPLESThrough the Facilities Master Planning process, the EVC Leadership Committee established a list of principles to develop and guide implementation ofthe master plan. These principles framed a high-level perspective, with focus on future site opportunities and analysis to reveal where the potentiallarge, key investments could be located.

Strengthen and enhance the campus image and University Identity.

Improve pedestrian connectivity, wayfinding, and experience.

Develop a new Medical Education Building to provide modern instructional

space and centralized student gathering and study spaces.

Generate and implement a plan to improve or eliminate unacceptable

research, classroom and student spaces, balancing new development and

the re-use of acceptable facilities.

Improve proximity of office to research to classroom space within the

various schools.

Maintain a strong connection between the University and the Hospital.

Improve parking provisions.

Accommodate growing faculty office space needs.

Reinforce and enhance public greenspace.


13%

35%43%

9%

BUILDING CONDITIONThrough a collaborative evaluation involving Design Team architects, engineers, and KUMC Facilities Management, a rating system was established to summarize the condition of campus facilities.

Some of the oldest buildings were evaluated as Inadequate to serve current and future needs (Delp, Olathe, Smith East, Smith West, Wescoe). These facilities are mostly 55 to 85 years old, inefficient in function and energy use, with obsolete infrastructure. Most were designed as Hospital-use facilities.

The current animal facility is evaluated as Marginal for long-term continued use.

Aging classroom space does not accommodate problem based and team based learning pedagogies.

Some current parking very inconveniently located.

10

Hemenway

DykesRSF

Bre

identh

al

Hoglund

Breidenthal Annex

Taylor

Nurse

Ed

Lied

Applegate

Sutherland

Instit.

Kirmayer

CD

U

Miller

Smith East

Smith West

Delp (F)

Delp (D)

Wescoe

Robinson

Murphy Sudler

Olathe

Olathe

Parking

Olathe

Parking

Cam

brid

ge P

ark

ing

Orr

Major

Hixon

Wahl East

Wahl Annex

Wahl West

Eato

n

Spencer Chapel

Student Center

Bluff

Parking

On a square footage basis, nearly ½ of campus space is rated as

Marginal to Inadequate.

Ratings Legend

Satisfactory: Good Condition, possibly needs limited upgrade

Marginal: Significant upgrade is required

Inadequate: Should be removed from service

Indicates The University of Kansas Hospital (TUKH) owned

facilities space that were not evaluated

Radiation Oncology

N

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500

Hospital

Parking

Office (non

research)

Research

Classroom

Net Assignable SFArea (x1000)

Existing

Upon Completion of Medical Education Building

Required for 2020

Construction of new Medical Education Building will meet all requirements for 10 year projections.

Assumes a moderate increase in efficiency of existing space - $200/SF minimum of external grant revenues.

121,500 NASF(194,400 GSF)

37,500 NASF(60,000 GSF)

Animal Facilities53,500 NASF(85,600 GSF)

(for comparison)

An additional 159,000+/- net assignable square feet of space (254,400 GSF), beyond the completion of a new Medical Education Building, may be required by the University within the next 10 years. This does not include parking, nor the relocation of existing research animal space currently in marginal facilities, which would require an additional 85,600 GSF.

SPACE NEEDS

AFTER NEW MEDICAL EDUCATION BUILDING IS CONSTRUCTEDEvaluation of the most immediate requirements facing KUMC indicated that creating newspace to house medical education is the most urgent. As well as developing a Phase Iprogram to satisfy this requirement, the Design Team also identified other anticipatedshortages of campus space based on projected growth.

Clinical faculty growth projected to require 200+/- new offices over the next 10-15 years.

65,200 SF of space is currently occupied by the Hospital and may potentially be

vacated when the next phase of Hospital construction is complete, but is primarily

in obsolete buildings that should be removed.

Research office growth is accommodated in research space growth projections.

+


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12

1

2

3

MASTER PLAN SITE DEVELOPMENT CORE CONCEPTSTo meet the space needs of the near future, and further delineate a plan for clear, organized

campus development over the next 20-30 years, the design team developed a pattern forcampus growth organized around several core concepts.

Enhance the campus image and University identity with strategic upgrades

Incorporatee three significant organizational elements to align with guiding principles

1. Strong Face of Education is Developed along Rainbow Boulevard

2. Greenway Pedestrian Connectivity is Enhanced from South to North

3. Medical Center Boulevard Identity is Enhanced

1

2

2

3

N

Medical Center Gateway Signage

“Four Corners” Campus Signage

Internal Signage and Wayfinding Opportunities

Master Plan Site Development Core Concepts1


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MASTER PLANSITE DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS

In addition to the Core Concepts, the Master Plan identifies several keyopportunities leading to the development of a stronger campus within thenext 20 to 30 years.

NEW EDUCATION BUILDING

Required by the university within the next five years

INCREASED PARKING CAPACITY

Current shortages and immediate growth will require a parkingexpansion within the next five years.

NEW RESEARCH BUILDING

Research growth will require additional square footage within thenext 10 years. In addition, replacement of several aging animalfacilities, a longer-term requirement, could best be accomplished intandem with a new research building.

INCREASE CAMPUS ENGINEERING CAPACITY

Construct a new central utility plant to support the future growth anddevelopment of campus facilities.

TUKH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The University of Kansas Hospital expansion will utilize existing landbank to immediately begin expanding to meet market needs.

CLINICAL TRANSLATIONAL ZONE

Enhance relationships and collaboration, fueled by physical proximityof students, faculty, researchers, and doctors in practice, and bymutual investment in facilities and projects.

ESTABLISH NEW CAMPUS GREEN

Use greenspace as an organizing feature for the placement andorientation of northward expansion.

Development that backs up against the North-South bluff will createiconic building opportunities as seen from the West.

13


LEGEND

EXISTING KUMC FACILITIES

PROPOSED KUMC FACILITIES

TUKH FACILITIES

OTHER BUILDINGS

DEMOLISHED BUILDINGS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

MASTER PLAN

14

New Medical Education BuildingNew Research Building

Increase Parking Capacity

Clinical Translational Zone

Increase Campus Utilities Infrastructure Capacity

N

Establish New Campus Green

TUKH Proposed Development


NEW MEDICAL EDUCATION BUILDING

CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PHASE IThe Design Team identified growth of medical education programs as themost pressing concern facing KUMC. To meet the state’s growingphysician workforce needs, KU SOM’s Kansas City campus should create afacility to promote 21st Century Medical Education.

A new Medical Education Building would:

Allow class size to increase by 50 students per class year, from 175per class to 225.

Promote contemporary Team-based and Problem-based Learningpedagogies and methods.

Create a state-of-the-art Human Patient Simulation Center withmulti-modal technologies that allow students to experience surgery,emergency room, and other problem-solving situations.

Provide technology enhanced classrooms, individual study, smallgroup learning, and interaction spaces.

Be recognized as the central home for Medical Education, housingstudent learning and support space, program administration and thetelecommunications hub for all campuses.

15

Concept Rendering:New Medical Education Building




ANALYSIS 3.0

MASTER PLAN 4.0


APPENDIX 6.0


EXISTING CONDITIONS 17

OVERVIEWThe University of Kansas Medical Center serves the State of Kansas through missions in education, research, patient care and community engagement. The main medical center campus in Kansas City is the primary home to the School of Medicine, School of Nursing, School of Health Professions, and School of Public Health. The School of Medicine also operates campuses in Wichita and Salina, and KUMC operates at several regional hospitals, clinical sites, and outreach programs throughout the state. For the purposes of this master plan, facilities outside of Kansas City were not evaluated.

SalinaKansas City

Wichita


EXISTING CONDITIONS

KANSAS CITY FACILITIESFacilities in Kansas City include the KUMC main campus and communityoutreach clinics. Only the main campus facilities at 39th and Rainbow wereconsidered in this Master Plan.

18

1

3

2

MIS

SOU

RIK

AN

SAS

US

HW

Y 6

9 /

MET

CA

LF A

VE

US

HW

Y 1

69 /

RA

INB

OW

BLV

D

KEY TO MAP

1. UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER MAIN CAMPUS

Including The University of Kansas Hospital

2. JAYDOC FREE CLINIC

3. SILVER CITY HEALTH CENTER

N


EXISTING CONDITIONS

KUMC LAND OWNERSHIPA complete look at land ownership on the 39th and Rainbow campus revealed several key points relevant to University development.

Much of the land owned by the University is already developed

KUMC is landlocked; there is limited opportunity to acquire additional contiguous properties

19

1.8 Acres

(internal campus space)

2.8 Acres

2.4 Acres

(planned for development)

3.9 Acres

2.3 Acres

Rainbow Mental

Health Facility

(owned by the

State of Kansas)

KUMC Land and Facilities

TUKH Land and Facilities

Owned by Others

LEGEND


EXISTING CONDITIONS

CAMPUS FACILITIES TIMELINE

20

1

44%

6%

13% 7%

11%

8%

11%

Prior to 1960 1960s

1970s 1980s

1990s 2000s

2010s

Nearly ½ of the space on campus is over 50 years old.

Approx. ¼ of total campus space was built between 1960 and 1990.

About 21% of Education space, and 29 % of Support space on

campus is less than 20 years old.

Heading to Pasture Middle Age Creaks

Recent Investments

19

60

19

80

20

00

19

40

19

20

19

50

19

70

19

90

19

30

20

10

3

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

1. 1905 – School of Medicine established

2. 1906 – School of Nursing established

3. 1924 – School of Medicine Moved to 39th

and Rainbow campus

4. 1971 – Wichita campus established

5. 1974 – School of Health Professions formally established as School of Allied Health

7. 1998 - Master of Public Health degree program established

6. 2011 – School of Medicine campus established in Salina

4 752

6

Buildings Constructed:

*TUKH Facilities not included


13%

35%43%

9%

EXISTING CONDITIONS

BUILDING CONDITIONBuildings that comprise the core of the KUMC main campus wereevaluated based on the Exterior Shell, Mechanical HVAC, Electrical, andFire Safety Systems, as well as the efficacy and adaptability of eachbuilding’s Architectural Layout and Structural System. Buildings with anaverage overall rating of Marginal may be maintained or upgraded at areasonable cost. Those buildings identified as Inadequate would require asubstantial amount of investment to maintain usability that isdisproportionate to their remaining value. The University should takeimmediate to short-term action to relocate programs out of, andsubsequently demolish these obsolescent facilities.

Some of the oldest buildings were evaluated as Inadequate to servecurrent and future needs (Delp (D), Olathe Pavilion, Smith East andWest, Wescoe Pavilion)

The current animal facility (RSF) was evaluated as Marginal

Aging classroom space does not accommodate problem based andteam based learning pedagogies

Some current parking is very inconveniently located

21

Hemenway

DykesRSF

Bre

identh

al

Hoglund

Breidenthal Annex

Taylor

Nurse

Ed

Lied

Applegate

Sutherland

Instit.

Kirmayer

CD

U

Miller

Smith East

Smith West

Delp (F)

Delp (D)

Wescoe

Robinson

Murphy Sudler

Olathe

Olathe

Parking

Olathe

Parking

Cam

brid

ge P

ark

ing

Orr

Major

Hixon

Wahl East

Wahl Annex

Wahl West

Eato

n

Spencer Chapel

Student Center

Bluff

Parking

On a square footage basis, nearly ½ of campus space is rated as

Marginal to Inadequate.

Ratings Legend

Satisfactory: Good Condition, possibly needs limited upgrade

Marginal: Significant upgrade is required

Inadequate: Should be removed from service

Indicates TUKH-owned facilities – not evaluated

Radiation Oncology

N


EXISTING CONDITIONS

BUILDING FUNCTIONThe current distribution of functions on campus highlights several points relevant to the efficiency of campus.

Research and Academic functions are somewhat dispersed

Clinical buildings are clustered; the majority of clinics remaining in University buildings are owned and operated by TUKH

Faculty offices are primarily located in Clinical buildings; a significant number of faculty offices are located in Marginal to Inadequate facilities

22

Hemenway

DykesRSF

Bre

identh

al

Hoglund

Breidenthal Annex

Taylor

Nurse

Ed

Lied

Applegate

Sutherland

Instit.

Kirmayer

CD

U

Miller

Smith East

Smith West

Delp (F)

Delp (D)

Wescoe

Robinson

Murphy Sudler

Olathe

Olathe

Parking

Olathe

Parking

Cam

brid

ge P

ark

ing

Orr

Major

Hixon

Wahl East

Wahl Annex

Wahl West

Eato

n

Student Center

Bluff

Parking

Spencer Chapel

Function Legend

Clinical (Includes KUMC & TUKH operated spaces)

Research

Education

Support


Radiation Oncology

N


EXISTING CONDITIONS

DISTRIBUTION OF SCHOOLSThe current location of buildings and spaces occupied by the schools that comprise KUMC reveals important information.

The School of Health Professions is dispersed throughout KUMC facilities.

School of Medicine occupies the majority of space on campus.

School of Public Health currently does not have a recognizable home. Ongoing renovations in Robinson will create this space.

23

51%

6%5%Less than

1%

10%

28%

Occupation Legend

School of Medicine

School of Nursing

School of Health Professions


Occupied by Others

Support


Hemenway

DykesRSF

Bre

identh

al

Hoglund

Breidenthal Annex

Taylor

Nurse

Ed

Lied

Applegate

Sutherland

Instit.

Kirmayer

CD

U

Miller

Smith East

Smith West

Delp (F)

Delp (D)

Wescoe

Robinson

Murphy Sudler

Olathe

Olathe

Parking

Olathe

Parking

Cam

brid

ge P

ark

ing

Orr

Major

Hixon

Wahl East

Wahl Annex

Wahl West

Eato

n

Student Center

Bluff

Parking

Spencer Chapel

Radiation Oncology

N

(School of Public Health)


EXISTING CONDITIONS

ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTMECHANICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Steam and Chilled Water Systems have adequate capacity to support the proposed Medical Education Building.

A new central plant will be required to expand campus capacity prior to any construction after Medical Education

24

Chilled Water / Steam Routing

The KUMC campus utilizes a Honeywell BAS system, which is a mixture of DDC and pneumatic controls, serving approximately 90% of AHUs across campus. Services are distributed via the utility tunnel system, which has reached capacity. Numerous leaks and flood damage have resulted across campus due to old, inadequate mechanical piping. Replacement of such piping should be a priority upgrade to campus infrastructure.

STEAM SYSTEM:

Three 55,000 lb/hr Nebraska boilers, installed in 1975, which operate at 125 PSI.

Each boiler currently operates at ½ to ⅔ capacity.

One boiler provides redundancy in the system.

Current upgrades include adding an economizer to one of the boilers. Upon completion, two of the three boiler will have economizers.

CHILLED WATER SYSTEM:

The central plant has seven chillers total: three at 1,000 tons and four at 1,250 tons. Some chillers were de-rated when refrigerant was changed.

The 1,250 ton machines are under five years old. The 1,000 ton machines were installed in the 1980s and ‘90s.

LWT is 42°. Winter ∆T is 4°, and summer ∆T is 8 °. The system was designed for a 12° ∆T. The university is working to improve ∆T.

There is physical room for one additional chiller in the central plant.

No cooling from the plant is backed up by emergency power.

N

Proposed Med Ed

Bldg Site


EXISTING CONDITIONS

ENGINEERING ASSESSMENTDOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION INFRASTRUCTURE

Domestic Water and Fire Protection System capacities are sufficient to support the proposed Medical Education Building

A new central plant will be required to expand campus capacity prior to any construction after Medical Education

25

Domestic Water / Fire Protection Routing

A 16 in. city water main along State Line Road provides both domestic water use and fire protection for campus buildings south of 39th Street. City water enters campus at Applegate Energy Center via a 12 in. main.

The central plan contains three booster pumps that increase water pressure for campus distribution.

DOMESTIC WATER:

Water is conditioned for domestic use by a water softener system.

A 12 in. soft/domestic water line leaves the central plan and is distributed via the campus utility tunnel system.

FIRE PROTECTION:

Campus buildings are protected by either a sprinkler or a standpipe system. Some buildings are only partially covered.

An 8 in. fire line (soft domestic water) is routed from Applegate via the tunnel system serves buildings south of 39th Street.

Buildings north of 39th Street utilize individual mains tied into the city water supply system.

N

Proposed Med Ed

Bldg Site


EXISTING CONDITIONS

ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTUREELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Generator capacity will be maxed out upon completion of current campus building projects

Adequate capacity exists to support the proposed Medical Education Building

A new central plant would serve the Medical Education building more efficiently

26

To Fishers Substation

Electrical Service Routing

Denotes buildings not on campus power

F-4 Switch

The existing campus electrical feed is distributed via duct banks which run through the utility tunnel network and basements of various buildings. Due to the complexity of this network, any demolition of campus buildings should ideally begin at the end of a feed and work backwards. In situations where this is not feasible, new infrastructure will have to be implemented in order to back-feed buildings to remain.

ELECTRICAL:

Campus is served from two 13.8 kV feeders from Fishers Substation

Campus utilizes one feeder for all power

Ample reserve power is available from the utility for expansion

Two 2.25 MW Diesel generators were added in 2009 to provide backup power to select campus buildings

Generators will be at maximum capacity upon completion of renovations undertaken prior to this master plan

N

Proposed Med Ed

Bldg Site




ANALYSIS 3.0

MASTER PLAN 4.0


APPENDIX 6.0


ANALYSIS

GROWTH PROJECTIONS SUMMARYBased on growth projections provided by KUMC, shortages will exist inclassroom, research, office, and parking space within the next 10 years ifthere is no new construction. These shortages total approximately383,000 net assignable square feet (not including parking).

28

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500

Hospital

Parking

Office (non research)

Research

Classroom


Existing

Required for 2020

(for comparison)


ANALYSIS

GROWTH PROJECTIONS SUMMARYUpon the completion of the proposed Medical Education Building, theprojected requirement in campus classroom space will be well-satisfied.Shortages in other areas within campus space will still exist, specifically121,500 NSF in research and 37,500 NSF in offices.

29

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500

Hospital

Parking

Office (non

research)

Research

Classroom


Existing

Upon Completion of Medical Education Building

Required for 2020

Construction of new Medical Education Building will meet all requirement for 10 year projections.

Assumes a moderate increase in efficiency of existing space - $200/SF minimum of external grant revenues.

121,500 NASF(194,400 GSF)

37,500 NASF(60,000 GSF)

Animal Facilities53,500 NASF(85,600 GSF)

(for comparison)

NO CHANGE

An additional 159,000+/- net assignable square feet of space (254,400 GSF), beyond the completion of a new Medical Education Building, may be required by the University within the next 10 years. This does not include parking, nor the relocation of existing research animal space currently in marginal facilities, which would require an additional 85,600 GSF.

+


ANALYSIS

EXISTING CLASSROOM UTILIZATIONThe need for campus classroom space was based on current and desiredutilization of existing space, also taking quality of spaces into account.Underutilization of existing space indicates that several substandard orpoorly located classrooms could be eliminated in order to increase theefficiency of classroom usage.

Usage analysis total % is based on class day from 8AM – 4PM; schoolin session 1,920 hours annually.

Based on preliminary analysis there is an average of 45% utilization ofexisting classrooms. Desired utilization rate is approximately 60%,indicating some spare capacity in existing classrooms.

Many of these classrooms are in substandard buildings which will betaken out of service, demolished or repurposed under this MasterPlan.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Orr

Maj

or

2004

Orr

Maj

or

2005

Mu

rph

y Lo

bb

y

Orr

Maj

or

2008

Lied

Hix

son

Mu

rph

y P

hill

ips

Orr

Maj

or

Sto

lan

d

Hem

men

way

100

5

Stu

d. C

ente

r Fr

anci

sco

SoN

Bo

ard

Rm

Mill

er 3

005

Orr

Maj

or

4007

Hem

men

way

100

9

Orr

Maj

or

4016

Orr

Maj

or

1012

/13

Orr

Maj

or

4006

Orr

Maj

or

1018

/19

SoN

401

6

Orr

Maj

or

4017

Orr

Maj

or

1010

Wah

l Eas

t A

ud

.

Orr

Maj

or

1004

Hem

men

way

100

3

Hem

men

way

100

1

SoN

402

4

SoN

104

7

Orr

Maj

or

4005

Orr

Maj

or

4014

Orr

Maj

or

4015

Stu

d. C

ente

r 30

01D

Orr

Maj

or

4004

Stu

d. C

ente

r B

atte

n.

SoN

201

4

Sud

ler

Sud

ler

Au

d.

Stu

d. C

ente

r 10

05

Stu

d. C

ente

r K

ansa

s

Wes

coe

2041

Orr

Maj

or

1006

Orr

Maj

or

1014

Lied

Au

d.

Mill

er 3

001

Orr

Maj

or

1025

SoN

B01

2

SoN

G01

3

SoN

B01

8

SoN

104

9

Ro

bin

son

Cle

nd

enin

g

SoN

105

0

Eato

n 4

893

Wes

coe

2023

Orr

Maj

or

1015

Del

p 2

035

SoN

Atr

ium

Auditorium

Large 41-100

Medium 31-40

Small 10-30

Open Area

30

Per

cen

tU

tiliz

ed

Desired Utilization Rate – 60% or better

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 4 13

Classrooms to be removed from service over time,under this Master Plan

1. Relocate to maintain adjacency to Clinical Functions2. Building to be demolished. Re-allocate to other ITV rooms.3. Eliminated due to underutilization, poor condition or proposed

repurposing. 4. See pages 55-56. Absorb functions into adjacent, underutilized spaces5. Function replaced by proposed Medical Education Building

55

CLASSROOM SIZE

Additionally, satisfying the requirement for a new Medical Educationbuilding will create substantial, up-to-date classrooms space, satisfyingprojected growth space needs for the next 10 years.


ANALYSIS

CLASSROOM NEEDS GROWTH PROJECTIONS

THERE IS APPROXIMATELY *59,000 SF OF CLASSROOM SPACE IN EXISTING FACILITIES

16,285 SF NEW CLASSROOM SPACE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE NEW MEDICAL EDUCATION BUILDING – A 28% INCREASE IN TOTAL CLASSROOM SPACE

NUMBER OF STUDENTS IN THE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE IS PROJECTED TO INCREASE FROM 175 TO 225 PER CLASS (FOUR CLASSES) – A 29% INCREASE IN SOM STUDENT POPULATION BY 2016

FROM DISCUSSIONS – MODERATE GROWTH IN SOME PROGRAMS, SOME PROGRAMS DECREASE IN SIZE – ASSUME AN ADDITIONAL 4% INCREASE IN STUDENT POPULATION OVER 10 YEARS DUE TO GROWTH IN REMAINING AREAS

** TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS ON CAMPUS CURRENTLY IS 3,196.

• Total School of Medicine 1,931

– MD Program 686

– Graduate Medical Education 766

– Medicine Graduate Programs 331

– Other Medical Education 148

• Total Remaining Programs 1,265

4% X 1,265 = 128 INCREASE IN THIS STUDENT POPULATION OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS

128 + 200 (SOM CLASS SIZE INCREASE) = 328 STUDENT GROWTH.

*Data derived from analysis of campus square footage for “instructional services” detail provided by KUMC Facilities Management

** For 2010 per the KUMC Office of Planning and Analysis

Note - Percentage of increase in student population does not necessarily correlate directly to SF of classroom needed. Classrooms are left unlocked much of the time and students often utilize the classrooms to study. A few classes are held without going through the reservation software so utilization percentages may be a little larger than indicated.

BASED ON 328 OR 10.3% INCREASE IN STUDENT POPULATION IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS, 65,077 SF OF HIGH QUALITY CLASSROOM SPACE WILL BE REQUIRED.

THE NEW MEDICAL EDUCATION BUILDING WILL PROVIDE 16,285 SF OF ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE FOR A TOTAL OF 75,285 SF = 10,208 SF MORE THAN REQUIRED, IF NO AGING SPACES WERE REPURPOSED OR DEMOLISHED. IT WILL ALSO PROVIDE SPACES FOR CURRENT PEDAGOGIES TO BE IMPLEMENTED AND INFORMAL LEARNING TO OCCUR.

APPROXIMATELY 76% OF EXISTING CLASSROOMS ARE BELOW OPTIMUM UTILIZATION (60% CLASSROOM UTILIZATION OR BETTER IS DESIRED, DEPENDING UPON SCHEDULINGCONSTRAINTS. AVERAGE CURRENT KUMC UTILIZATION IS 45%)

THE ABOVE SUGGESTS THAT CURRENT NEED COULD BE SATISFIEDWITH 75% OF THE EXISTING SPACE (59,000 SF X 25% REDUCTION EQUALS 15,000 SF).

THEREFORE, NEW, MODERN FACILITIES WILL ALLOW FOR REPURPOSING OR DEMOLITION OF UP TO 25,208 NSF (10,208 + 15,000) OF SEVERELY OUTDATED AND/OR POORLY LOCATED CLASSROOM SPACE, AS OUTLINED ON PREVIOUS PAGE.

31


ANALYSIS

RESEARCH GROWTH PROJECTIONSMODERATE GROWTH IN RESEARCH MAY ADD UP TO 127 NEW PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR TEAMS BY 2021

2% Annual Growth Projection utilized for planning purposes

5% Annual Growth Projection was reviewed; rejected as too aggressive

If greater efficiency of use can be achieved in some existing researchspace, new space requirement is moderately reduced. Even assumingincreased efficiency of existing research space use, additional spacewould be needed for 81-104 PI Teams

1,500 NSF average space requirement is assumed per PI Team for futuregrowth projections

This would mean 121,500-156,000 new net assignable square feetrequired for research over the period of the Master Plan (201,690 -259,000 gross square feet at 60% building efficiency)

Research revenue per NSF is external grant revenue per PI team, dividedby total space allocated per PI team. Target is $200/N

SF

32

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Timeline of Master Plan

Nu

mb

er

of

Pri

nci

ple

Inve

stig

ato

rs

936 potential PIs

707 potential PIs

Current Excess Capacity: 23 PI Labs using a

$100/SF benchmark

Current Excess Capacity: 46 PI Labs using a

$200/SF benchmark

580 current PIs

33%

29%

16%

7%3%

12%

Below $100 $101 - $200

$201 - $300 $301 - $400

$401 - $500 $501 - Above

Currently, Up to 62% of PIs do not achieve $200 in grant revenue / SF of Laboratory Space, allowing additional

growth capabilities within existing space

Aggressive target would require up to 534,000 SF of additional space (not utilized in this Master Plan)

Existing Condition:Percentage of PIs by $/SF of

Research Space

81

PI

10

4 P

I


ANALYSIS

OFFICE SPACE GROWTH PROJECTIONSFACTS AND PROJECTIONS*

Approx. 516 predominantly clinical faculty on campus

Existing offices are allocated at one per person

Clinical faculty may grow up to 40% to match growth plans of TUKHto meet health care needs in the region, requiring 206 new offices

SPACE NEEDS

New offices required: Say Approx. 200 @ 300 Gross SF = 60,000 GSF

65,200 NSF of space is currently occupied by the Hospital and maypotentially be vacated when the next phase of Hospital constructionis completed

However, 48,000 NSF of that 65,200 NSF is in buildings identified forremoval from service due to age, condition and inherent inefficiencyof the building.

32

*Data derived from analysis of campus square footage detail provided by KUMC Facilities Management, the Department of Research, and the Hospital

300 GSF PER FACULTY IS DERIVED FROM: Area Req’d Area per Faculty . GSF per Faculty

Faculty Office 120 NSF 120 NSF

Every 12 faculty need:

Conference Room 300 NSF

Work Room 150 NSF

Lounge 150 NSF

(2) Secretarial/Waiting 150 NSF

750 NSF / 12 = 62.5 NSF

Department Heads – Every 20 faculty need:

Additional Office Space 40 NSF

Secretarial office 150 NSF

190 NSF / 20 = 9.5 NSF

TOTAL 192 NSF X 1.56 = (grossing factor for offices)

300 GSF




ANALYSIS 3.0

MASTER PLAN 4.0


APPENDIX 6.0


MASTER PLAN

PRIORITIESThe KUMC EVC Leadership Committee established several priorities toaddress strategic planning in key service lines.

In order to provide excellence in medical education, The University ofKansas Medical center must establish and implement a plan toprovide facilities that support 21st century educational methods andpractices.

University faculty will grow at a rate parallel to the rapid expansion ofThe University of Kansas Hospital. Together, KUMC will providecontinued excellence in patient care to the communities it serves.

University research programs will target moderate growth rates overthe next several years, and seek to expand the scope of researchwhile remaining within the physical constraints of the existingfacilities on campus, for several years into the future.

34


MASTER PLAN

SITE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINESPreliminary analysis based on observation and study of the campus siteestablished guidelines that influenced the development of the masterplan.

Continue to promote the established presence of the Universityalong Rainbow Boulevard, allowing TUKH to maintain a front doorexperience along Cambridge Avenue.

Capitalize upon the connectivity of 39th Street with TUKH in order tostrengthen the unified identity of The University of Kansas MedicalCenter.

Address the existing campus south of 39th Street with deliberatecare. Strive to alleviate congestion, relieve an over-built condition,create meaningful campus open spaces and improve efficiency byremoving selected obsolescent facilities.

Focus future campus development primarily north of 39th Street.Establish a development plan that improves the campus identityand experience concurrently with TUKH expansion anddevelopment.

Expand parking facilities conveniently and efficiently, while avoidingover development of the campus core with service facilities.

35

NPrimary Traffic ArterySecondary Traffic – Hospital/PublicTertiary Traffic – University

Views of KUMC establishing

campus image

Views of KUMC establishing

campus image

STA

TE L

INE

RA

INB

OW

BLV

D

CA

MB

RID

GE

AV

ENU

E

39th STREET


MASTER PLAN

LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANSITE DEVELOPMENT CORE CONCEPTS

To meet the space needs of the near future, and further delineate a planfor clear, organized campus development over the next 20-30 years, thedesign team developed a pattern for campus growth based on threeprimary concepts.

36

1

2

3

1

2

N

2

3

1. The strong presence and visibility of education is strengthened alongRainbow Blvd.

2. Greenway pedestrian connectivity from South to North is enhanced

3. The identity of “Medical Center Boulevard” (39th Street) is improved


MASTER PLAN

LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANSITE DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS

In addition to the Core Concepts, the Baseline Master Plan identifiesseveral key opportunities leading to the development of a strongercampus within the next 20 to 30 years.

NEW EDUCATION BUILDING

Required by the university within the next five years

INCREASED PARKING CAPCITY

Current shortages and immediate growth will require a parkingexpansion within the next five years.

NEW RESEARCH BUILDING

Research growth will require additional square footage within thenext 10 years.

INCREASED CAMPUS ENGINEERING CAPACITY

Construct a new central utility plant to support the future growth anddevelopment of campus facilities.

TUKH NORTWARD DEVELOPMENT

Hospital expansion will utilize existing land bank to immediatelybegin expanding to meet market needs.

STRENGTHEN COLLABORATION

Enhance relationships and collaboration, fueled by physical proximityof students, faculty, researchers, and doctors in practice, and bymutual investment in facilities and projects.

ESTABLISH NEW DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS

Use greenspace as an organizing feature for the placement andorientation of northward expansion.

Development that backs up against the North-South bluff will createiconic building opportunities as seen from the West.

37


LEGEND



TUKH FACILITIES

OTHER BUILDINGS


MASTER PLAN

LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN

38

New Medical Education BuildingNew Research Building

Increase Parking Capacity

Strengthen Collaboration

Increased Campus Engineering Capacity

N

Establish New Development Patterns

TUKH Northward Development


MASTER PLAN

LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANENGINEERING ASSESSMENT

The existing campus infrastructure has reached a feasible operatingcapacity. Current systems will be able to support limited campusdevelopment, and will be maxed out with the development of the MedicalEducation Building. As a long term goal, the university should utilizeApplegate Energy Center to serve all buildings south of 39th Street. Aseparate system of utilities and services should be implemented tosupport future development north of 39th Street. Any construction priorto a new central plant should be designed to switch over to newinfrastructure as it becomes available.

According to the strategic facilities master plan being concurrentlydeveloped by TUKH, the hospital will also be constructing a new centralutility plant to support future development.

The historical method of independent ownership and operation of centralutilities would require both KUMC and TUKH to construct separatefacilities to achieve this purpose. At a point in time where these masterplans converge, the design teams foresee a second, alternative option.

Through collaboration between KUMC and TUKH, it would be possible tolease a selected portion of property for the construction and operation ofa central utility by a third party owner. University and hospitaldevelopment would both draw from this infrastructure and utilities wouldbe metered and purchased by each party based upon usage. Greaterbenefit would be achieved by development of a central utility that isexpandable, and capacity added parallel to campus development.

39


MASTER PLAN

LONG-TERM COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLANENGINEERING ASSESSMENT

40

Obsolete buildings to be removed Olathe is at end of Chilled Water loop and

can be removed at any time.

New Medical Education Building To originally be served from Applegate Energy Center.

Should be designed and allow for connection to new central plant when completed.

Campus development north of 39th Street All new buildings powered from new Central Plant

Chilled Water and Steam for RadiationOncology, Delp (F), and Robinson are fedthrough Wescoe and Delp (D). Cooling andHeating strategies for these buildings will berequired prior to demolition.

New central utility plant zone Will be required to support future

campus development


MASTER PLAN

ALTERNATE MASTER PLANSITE DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS

Concurrent development of KUMC and TUKH Strategic Facilities MasterPlans allowed the design teams to identify opportunities for coordinatedcampus development. Through collaboration in areas of land ownershipand treatment of obsolescent facilities, an alternate pattern ofdevelopment and construction could be established that may improvelong term campus relationships north of 39th Street. Development of thismodified direction of the Master Plan would be dependant upon futuredecisions made jointly by KUMC and TUKH.

TUKH DIRECT EXPANSION

In this option Hospital facilities expand due North, west of Cambridge,relating directly to existing facilities, lessening the impact ofdevelopment and creating a stronger connection to new research andeducational facilities.

IMPROVED GREENSPACE UTILIZATION

Parallel development of university facilities along the bluff anddevelopment of Hospital buildings allow both take advantage of acommon greenspace.

University faculty, staff, and students, as well as hospital patients andstaff all benefit from the use of a common enhanced pedestrian-oriented landscape.

MAXIMIZE COLLABORATIVE ENGAGEMENT

The first phase of Hospital development allows it to be in a positionthat would encourage collaborative functions recommended in theLong-Term Comprehensive Master Plan.

REMOVE IMPEDIMENT BUILDINGS

Immediate need for Hospital expansion would require acceleratedremoval of small, scattered university facilities consisting of ResearchSupport Facility, Breidenthal and Breidenthal Annex incubators, andHoglund Brain Imaging Center.

SERVICE AND PARKING AT PERIMETER

Hospital parking facilities and service access occur from State LineRoad, away from the campus interior.

The immediate demand for campus parking facilities could be satisfiedby constructing a facility at the corner of 39th and State Line Road. Thiswould also satisfy projected demand from future phases of Hospitaldevelopment.

By not directly expanding Bluff Parking Facility, further greenspacedevelopment would be permitted adjacent to Rainbow Blvd.,extending greenway connectivity to future development.

41


LEGEND



TUKH FACILITIES

OTHER BUILDINGS


MASTER PLAN

ALTERNATE MASTER PLAN

42

TUKH Direct Expansion

Remove Impediment Buildings Service and Parking at Perimeter

Improved Greenspace Utilization


LEGENDMEDICAL CENTER GATEWAY SIGNAGE

“FOUR CORNERS” CAMPUS SIGNAGE

INTERNAL SIGNAGE AND

WAYFINDING OPPORTUNITIES

MASTER PLAN : DETAILS

SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING

43

N

Guiding Principles



MASTER PLAN : DETAILS 44

LEGENDPATIENT/VISITOR TRAFFIC

FACULTY/STAFF TRAFFIC

MEDICAL CENTER GATEWAY

CAMPUS CIRCULATION

N

Will require significant improvements

Guiding Principles

Strengthen and enhance the campus image and University identity.



SITE DEVELOPMENT CORE CONCEPTSTHE STRONG FACE OF EDUCATION ALONG RAINBOW BLVD

45

Guiding Principles


New Medical Education Building

School of Nursing


Signature Research Building

Future Signature Building

Rainbow Mental Health Facility

(Owned by the State of Kansas)

Enhanced, consistent landscaping and defined open spaces along Rainbow

Enhanced, consistent landscaping and defined open spaces

Consolidate School of Health Professions N

KUMC Gateway Signage



SITE DEVELOPMENT CORE CONCEPTSPEDESTRIAN GREENWAY

46

Guiding Principles

Improve pedestrian connectivity, wayfinding, and experience


Remove Obsolete Buildings

Eliminate Pedestrian “Roadblock” Structures

Develop with Greenspace as Organizer

Eliminate Pedestrian “Roadblock” Infrastructure

Improve Pedestrian Pathway Past Orr-Major

N



SITE DEVELOPMENT CORE CONCEPTSMEDICAL CENTER BOULEVARD

47

Guiding Principles



Maintain a strong connection between the University and the Hospital.

KUMC Gateway Signage

High Visibility Pedestrian Crosswalk

Signature Paving

Dedicated Bicycle Lane

Enclosed Hospital Bridge

TUKH/KUMC Gateway Signage

Existing Pedestrian Bridge

New Pedestrian Bridge to

Medical Education Building

Increased Road Width

Wider, Improved Median

Regulated Traffic to Key Access Points

Pedestrian-Level Lighting

Consistent, Dense Landscape Treatment

N


MASTER PLAN

DETAILED CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTSCREATION OF NEW COLLABORATIVE PROGRAMS SITE

Solutions to the most pressing situations identified by the design team areinterdependent, and coincide with the proposed restructuring of the sitebetween Eaton and Cambridge streets immediately north of 39th Street.Functions that occupy scattered facilities should be incorporated intobuilding projects to accommodate growth within the next 10-20 years. Ahigher utilization of the site would involve the construction of a facilitydesigned to promote collaboration with The University of Kansas Hospital.

Potential program opportunities include:

Tertiary/Ambulatory Care

Relocated and Expanded Brain Imaging Clinic/Research

Collaborative Translational Research

Entrepreneurial Incubator Space

Distance Learning and Conference Center

Faculty Offices

48

*See Appendix for detailed calculations of square footage to satisfy projected faculty growth.

Relocate Research Support Facility function to subgrade

facility constructed with new Research Building; expand

current Hemenway vivarium and link the two vivaria.

12,200 GSF Hoglund Imaging Center relocates and is absorbed into higher function Neurology Hospital or Collaborative Building

Breidenthal incubator contracts are bought out or allowed to lapse; 48,520 GSF Breidenthal and Breidenthal Annex can be removed

Removal of buildings is also necessary to complete widening

of 39th Street

N

New research building required within 10 years

Preferred approach to resolve faculty office shortfall

New Medical Education Building

Shortages identified by facility impact analysis include:

CLINICAL/FACULTY OFFICES

Approximately 200 new faculty offices (60,000 SF*) will be requiredto accommodate faculty growth.

RESEARCH

As many as 127 additional Principal Investigator research teams willrequire between 121,500-156,000 new net assignable square feet(194,400-249,600 GSF) of research space.

EDUCATION

The new 200,000 SF Medical Education Building will be requiredwithin five years to allow for expansion of class sizes, providefacilities to meet evolving teaching methodologies, and meet LCMEaccreditation standards.

Efficient utilization of existing (and planned) classroom spaceindicates that there will not be any additional need for growth.


MASTER PLAN

DETAILED CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTSRE-PURPOSING ORR-MAJOR

Orr-Major is the current home of Medical Education at KUMC. With theconstruction of a new Medical Education building, several functions withinOrr-Major will vacate their existing space.

11,360+ NSF of space will become available by functions moving toMedical Education and other renovations

Consolidation of School of Health Professions faculty will promote astronger identity and locate faculty closer to the primary studentexperience.

49

Guiding Principles



…improve or eliminate unacceptable classroom and student spaces, balancing new development and the re-use of acceptable facilities. First Floor Plan

Backfill at Nursing Entry Level to improve courtyard space and create greenway pedestrian connector

New bridge and vestibule, raise courtyard entry from level below

Demolish existing stair tower, “flying” study lounge, and projecting bookstore skylights on North façade

Improve landscaping and ramp to Basement Level and 39th Street

Remove one classroom and create improved entry at functional level

Entrance Below at Basement Level

Ground Level Second Floor Fourth Floor

Consolidate basic science research to other facilities

Eliminate low-utilization classrooms and repurpose the space.

Existing Anatomy labs move to renovated Fourth Floor and expand

Renovate space to School of Health Professions faculty

Video-capable classrooms remain in place

Student groups and study spaces move to Medical Education

Renovate to School of Health Professions faculty offices

N

Demolish concrete ramps and extend courtyard to South face of Orr-Major

current student groups

current anatomylabs

current research

labs

current low-use

classrooms


MASTER PLAN

DETAILED CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS

50

Proposed SectionOpen, landscaped pathway

Existing Section Looking NorthConstricted pedestrian passage west of Orr-Major

Existing Condition Proposed Condition

Remove small building extensions at Orr-Major

Orr-MajorSchool of Nursing Orr-Major

School of Nursing

Raise grade to consistent elevation

Orr-Major isolated stair tower

School of Nursing (beyond)

Bridge across 39th Street to new Medical Education BuildingOrr-Major “flying” study lounge

Taylor Hall east stair entrance

Improved plaza between Orr-Major and School of Nursing

Improved access to landscaped greenway connector


MASTER PLAN

DETAILED CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTSOFFICE GROWTH ACCOMMODATION (PREFERRED APPROACH)

ADD TWO FLOORS TO DYKES LIBRARY:

The existing Dykes Library building, constructed in 1983, was designed toaccommodate vertical expansion of an additional two stories. With afootprint of 29,000 gross square feet, an addition would provide 58,000gross square feet to be used for faculty offices. This would satisfy theprojected new office space requirement identified in the Master Plan.

Additionally, Dykes Library is located immediately adjacent to theproposed new Medical Education Building. A bridge between the twobuildings would situate students and professors in close proximity. Inaddition, the proposed Education Commons in the new Medical EducationBuilding will have well-equipped Information Center clusters for digitalaccess to multiple resources in addition to its other functions. Over time,as traditional library book storage functions are reduced, additional spacemay become available for expansion in the existing Dykes Library building.

MECHANICAL IMPACT

Modification of current chilled water would permit addition to beserved by existing distribution from Applegate Energy Center.

Any addition should also be designed for connection to the newcentral utility plant.

Multiple exhaust fans and outside air intakes currently situated onthe roof would need to be extended to the roof of the addition.

ELECTRICAL IMPACT

An emergency generator may be required for an elevator to serve allexisting and additional floors.

Increased service entrance conductors may be required for mainincoming service.

An upgraded transformer may be required if main service to thebuilding is increased.

51

Potential Office Floor Concept Above Existing Dykes Library

New Bridge to Med Ed.

Bldg at 2nd Floor

N


MASTER PLAN

DETAILED CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTSOFFICE GROWTH ACCOMMODATION (OPTIONAL APPROACH)

EXPAND VERTICALLY ON RADIATION ONCOLOGY SITE

According to the TUKH master plan, facilities constructed by the hospitalin the future will move acute services north of 39th Street. This couldresult in the existing Radiation Oncology building located on RainbowBoulevard becoming available for university use. The structure of thebuilding, built in 1980, was reportedly designed to accommodate verticalexpansion of up to five stories.

The usable structural base would provide a floor plate of 18,800 GSF. Fullbuild-out of a 5-story vertical expansion could create an additional 94,000GSF (approximately 58,000 net assignable square feet) of space to be usedfor faculty offices and other uses.

Various drawbacks to this site including detachment of faculty fromstudents, as well as uncertainty of the timeframe for availability, make thisa less desirable option for the University.

MECHANICAL IMPACT

Chilled Water and Steam service are currently routed throughWescoe and Delp. If these buildings are removed, a modified routeor new chillers and boilers would be required to serve a proposedexpansion on the Radiation Oncology site.

Equipment and ductwork will be required to extend to the new roofin order to serve the existing space.

New HVAC will be required for the addition.

ELECTRICAL IMPACT

A generator will be required for two elevators to serve verticalexpansion, per International Building Code.

A service upgrade and switchgear replacement will be required formain incoming service.

Utility transformer at the building will require an upgrade due to anincrease in service.

52

Approximate outline of buildingarea capable of supportingmulti-level vertical expansion(18,800 GSF/floor)

N

Radiation Oncology Building Plan


MASTER PLAN

DETAILED CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTSRESEARCH BUILDING REQUIRED WITHIN 10 YEARS

Even Moderate projected growth in research functions may add up to 127new Principal Investigator teams by 2021. It is anticipated that 23-46 ofthe new teams could be accommodated within existing space by achievinggreater efficiency. Therefore, our planning is based on the assumption ofnew space growth to accommodate 81 new P.I. teams. Assuming agreater than current percentage of new research teams may be dry-lab orcomputational-based, a relatively conservative space projection for a newresearch building would allocate 1,500 NSF per PI team.

121,500 new Net Square Feet would be required to accommodatethis growth in research.

In planning for a new research building project, KUMC should alsoconsider the replacement of animal facilities in the Research SupportFacility and Smith East which are currently rated in marginal condition.

Current Research Support Animal Facility space occupies 74,300 GSF(approximately 45,000 NSF)

The modern existing vivarium in Hemenway LSIC occupies 10,376NSF; it is anticipated that additional new animal facilities to replaceRSF should be located near the Hemenway vivarium space.

Relocating animal facilities to a space within a new research buildingwould utilize a larger floor area than the current RSF and increaseefficiency and safety of facilities.

53

*Assume Grossing Factor of 1.6

New Research Building construction required to accommodate growth 121,500 NSF (194,400 NSF)

Replace existing animal facilities in RSF and Smith, plus modest growth 53,500 NSF (86,600 NSF)

Total NSF Required: 175,000 NSF

Total GSF Required: 280,000 GSF*




ANALYSIS 3.0

MASTER PLAN 4.0


APPENDIX 6.0



THE FUTURE OF MEDICAL EDUCATIONThe University of Kansas School of Medicine (KU SOM) is the only medicalschool in Kansas and a premier institution for training primary care andrural physicians. To meet the state’s growing physician workforce needs,KU SOM’s Kansas City campus should increase its enrollment by 50students per class, from the current 175 to the proposed 225 students by2014.

The 21st Century curriculum of medical education:

Emphasizes small-group, interdisciplinary problem solving

Allows more direct contact with faculty for more in-depth discussionof difficult topics

Uses simulation with actors as patients and highly sophisticatedrobots to simulate patients

Is technology-driven, requiring interactive televideo with advancedgraphics

Takes place in a building recognized as the medical educationbuilding, which houses students, program administration and thetelecommunications hub for all campuses

The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), the nation’s MedicalSchool accrediting body, is next scheduled to visit KU SOM in the fall of2013. At that time, the school must demonstrate that it meets thestandards for evaluation of medical education programs – or it must havefacilities under construction that will meet these standards.

The new Medical Education Building will provide:

Classrooms equipped with interactive televideo and other advancedtechnology

A state-of-the-art Human Patient Simulation Center with multi-modaltechnologies that allow students to experience surgery, emergencyroom, and other problem-solving situations

Modern clinical skill laboratories where medical, nursing, and otherhealth-professions teams focus on the patient experience

Lecture halls designed for rapid movement into and out of smallgroups

Spaces that encourage quiet study as well as social interaction

Offices for administration, and increased interaction of faculty andstaff from all schools

55



SITE PLANAs Phase I of the Master Plan, the Design Team undertook site analysis,preliminary program development, and cost estimation for the creation ofa new Medical Education Building. In keeping with the guiding principlesand creating a strong image for KUMC, the site at the intersection of 39th

Street and Rainbow Boulevard was indentified for high visibility andintegration with the existing campus. A new building on this site shouldutilize the opportunity to create a new student activity plaza and enhancethe development of campus greenspace. A pedestrian bridge connectionacross 39th Street would improve circulation within campus, and create anopportunity for prominent University signage. Orientation of the buildingalong 39th Street would also enhance campus identity, as well as allowdirect physical connection to Dykes Library, further strengthening theSchool of Medicine experience.

56

New Student Plaza

New Bridge across 39th Street

Bluff Parking Facility

Parking Expansion

Hemenway LSIC

Hoglund Brain Imaging Center

Research Support Facility

Orr-Major

Dykes Library

Nurse Ed

39th STREET

New Medical Education Building - 200,000 GSF

N



PROGRAM SUMMARYSpace needs for a New Medical Education Building were developedthrough meetings with KUMC EVC Leadership, individual user groups, andFaculty Town Hall meetings. To meet the immediate, evolving needs ofmedical education and allow for near-term growth of the School ofMedicine, the following functions were identified as being at the core ofthe medical education experience at KUMC.

57

Space Type Area

Problem Based Learning and Team Based Learning Classrooms 10,500 NASF

Technology-Rich Classrooms and Support 19,585 NASF

Student Educational Commons 27,104 NASF

Clinical Simulation Center 25,860 NASF

Student Services, Societies, and Support 25,971 NASF

Offices and Administration 11,260 NASF

Public Spaces 5,850 NASF

Building Support 7,100 NASF

Total NASF: 133,230 NASF

Total GSF: 200,000 GSF*

Plus 2,900 GSF for elevators, renov. of Dykes Library, and Bridges



BUILDING PROGRAM

58

DERIVATION OF NET AREAS AT KUMC

TOTAL NET ASSIGNABLE SQUARE FEET 133,230 NASF

Space Useable

Non-

Assignable

ID No. Space Name Net Area Net Area

1.000 Public Spaces

1.100 Lobby 3,600

1.200 Large Conference Rm. 2,250

Subtotal Public Spaces 5,850

2.000 Building Support

2.100 Assignable Building Support 7,100

2.200 Non-Assignable Building Support 5,190

2.300 Mechanical Spaces 17,760

Subtotal Building Support 7,100 22,950

3.000 Vertical Circulation

3.100 Stairs 4,995

3.200 Elevators 1,500

Subtotal Vertical Circulation 0 6,495

4.000 NOT USED

5.000 Team Based Learning

5.100 Large (seats 235) 6,000

Subtotal Team Based Learning 6,000

6.000 Classrooms

6.100 Medium Classrooms (seats 45) 12,760

6.300 Large, Sloped Floor Classrm/Aud 3,525

6.200 Classroom Support 3,300

Subtotal Classrooms 19,585

7.000 Problem Based Learning

7.100 Small Group (seats 8-10) 4,500

Subtotal Problem Based Learning 4,500

Space Useable

Non-

Assignable

ID No. Space Name Net Area Net Area

8.000 Educational Commons

8.100 Educational Commons 12,000

8.300 Distributed Student Study Areas 15,104

Subtotal Educational Commons 27,104

9.000 Simulation Centers

9.010 Lobby / Waiting 1,305

9.101 Standardized Patient Care Training 8,790

9.200

High Fidelity Patient Simulator Training/Scenario

Suites and Support 13,645

9.400 Simulation Admin. Services 2,120

Subtotal Simulation Centers 25,860

10.000 Office

10.100 Program Administration 1,785

10.200 School of Medicine Departments 3,130

10.703 Clerical, Workspace, Supplies 5,310

10.107 Office Infrastructure and Support 1,035

Subtotal Office 11,260

11.000 Student Support

11.100 Recreation and Support 8,850

11.300 Public/Visitor Support 3,365

11.700 Kiva Study Rooms 2,460

11.800 Student Society Village w/2 faculty Offices 11,296

Subtotal Student Support 25,971

12.000 Stair/Elev at Dykes Lib Bridge Connection 1,000

13.000 Stair/Elev at Bridge Connection 2,460

TOTAL NET ASSIGNABLE AREA 133,230

TOTAL NON ASSIGNABLE NET S.F. 32,905

TOTAL BGSF 200,000



SECTION LOOKING NORTHDiagrammatic study of the established program presents the opportunityfor clear organization of building functions around identifiable publicspaces. Highly-utilized student spaces have the opportunity to enliven themost visible face of the campus, allowing students to engage with moreformal learning environments located deeper within the building.

59

SIMULATION LABS AND RELATED OFFICES

PROBLEM BASED AND TEAM BASED LEARNING

CLASSROOMSEDUCATIONAL COMMONS

EDUCATIONAL COMMONS CLASSROOMS

CLASSROOMS

PUBLIC SPACES

EDUC. COMMONS

LOBBY

BRIDGE

EDUCATIONAL COMMONS MECHANICAL

CLASSROOMS

SIMULATION LABS AND RELATED OFFICES


60

Name

Address

Date

Size

Client Kansas University Medical Center Washington University D'Youville College University Research & Development Enhancement Corp.UKHA

Market Segment College & University Science & Technology College & University Science & Technology Health Care

Function Academic Biomed / Chemistry Academic Biomed / Chemistry Ambulatory Care

WBS Code WBS Name Quantity Net Unit

Price

Net Total Quantity Normalize

d Unit

Price

Normalized

Total

Quantity Normalize

d Unit

Price

Normalized

Total

Quantity Normalize

d Unit

Price

Normalized

Total

Quantity Normalize

d Unit

Price

Normalized Total

12.5%01-00-00 GENERAL

REQUIREMENTS

200,000 $32.49 $6,497,000 666,000 $26.91 $17,923,979 93,225 $22.27 $2,075,900 208,650 $29.68 $6,193,528 183,158 $25.88 $4,739,663

02-00-00 EXISTING CONDITIONS 200,000 $0.00 $0 666,000 $2.95 $1,962,732 93,225 $0.00 $0 208,650 $0.00 $0 183,158 $2.11 $386,109

03-00-00 CONCRETE 200,000 $21.25 $4,250,000 666,000 $26.83 $17,867,708 93,225 $18.27 $1,703,395 208,650 $27.48 $5,733,849 183,158 $13.43 $2,459,44004-00-00 MASONRY 200,000 $2.00 $400,000 666,000 $16.18 $10,776,771 93,225 $10.07 $938,653 208,650 $12.72 $2,654,987 183,158 $9.00 $1,648,38005-00-00 METALS 200,000 $35.96 $7,192,000 666,000 $56.30 $37,496,585 93,225 $33.03 $3,079,635 208,650 $11.43 $2,384,145 183,158 $43.08 $7,890,57206-00-00 WOOD, PLASTICS, AND

COMPOSITES

200,000 $3.74 $748,000 666,000 $8.15 $5,425,387 93,225 $1.31 $121,847 208,650 $0.35 $73,028 183,158 $5.49 $1,005,109

07-00-00 THERMAL AND

MOISTURE PROTECTION

200,000 $14.53 $2,906,000 666,000 $11.14 $7,415,994 93,225 $11.03 $1,028,569 208,650 $6.44 $1,344,497 183,158 $6.80 $1,245,979

08-00-00 OPENINGS 200,000 $25.49 $5,098,000 666,000 $16.79 $11,180,310 93,225 $18.74 $1,747,126 208,650 $15.14 $3,158,303 183,158 $34.82 $6,376,90609-00-00 FINISHES 200,000 $35.00 $7,000,000 666,000 $14.35 $9,559,351 93,225 $23.27 $2,169,135 208,650 $23.14 $4,827,182 183,158 $59.75 $10,944,52610-00-00 SPECIALTIES 200,000 $0.89 $178,000 666,000 $0.47 $314,746 93,225 $0.90 $83,445 208,650 $1.59 $331,586 183,158 $0.61 $111,67911-00-00 EQUIPMENT 200,000 $10.58 $2,116,000 666,000 $4.37 $2,912,509 93,225 $4.23 $394,252 208,650 $21.09 $4,400,283 183,158 $1.83 $335,03712-00-00 FURNISHINGS 200,000 $5.07 $609,000 666,000 $8.79 $5,854,764 93,225 $3.11 $289,801 208,650 $1.08 $224,690 183,158 $7.32 $1,340,14613-00-00 SPECIAL

CONSTRUCTION

200,000 $2.32 $463,000 666,000 $1.44 $956,143 93,225 $0.00 $0 208,650 $0.00 $0 183,158 $0.91 $167,518

14-00-00 CONVEYING EQUIPMENT 200,000 $3.60 $720,000 666,000 $3.65 $2,429,961 93,225 $3.43 $320,032 208,650 $2.68 $558,203 183,158 $10.33 $1,892,239

21-00-00 FIRE SUPPRESSION 200,000 $4.92 $984,000 666,000 $5.90 $3,930,086 93,225 $6.17 $574,821 208,650 $4.56 $952,393 183,158 $3.03 $555,20722-00-00 PLUMBING 200,000 $13.16 $2,632,000 666,000 $13.43 $8,943,604 93,225 $9.86 $918,919 208,650 $14.46 $3,017,212 183,158 $14.89 $2,727,06223-00-00 HEATING, VENTILATING,

AND AIR-CONDITIONING

(HVAC)

200,000 $50.00 $10,000,000 666,000 $66.38 $44,209,317 93,225 $41.31 $3,851,212 208,650 $49.30 $10,287,123 183,158 $42.23 $7,735,347

26-00-00 ELECTRICAL-Ref Detail 200,000 $17.73 $3,545,000 666,000 $30.07 $20,027,672 93,225 $21.18 $1,974,212 208,650 $26.51 $5,531,312 183,158 $25.43 $4,657,00727-00-00 COMMUNICATIONS-Ref

Detail

200,000 $3.80 $760,000 666,000 $1.14 $756,775 93,225 $4.32 $402,732 208,650 $0.75 $156,488 183,158 $2.23 $408,745

28-00-00 ELECTRONIC SAFETY &

SECURITY-Ref to Detail

200,000 $2.39 $477,000 666,000 $4.90 $3,262,496 93,225 $3.50 $326,288 208,650 $2.25 $469,463 183,158 $3.05 $558,394

31-00-00 EARTHWORK 200,000 $2.88 $575,000 666,000 $3.20 $2,129,180 93,225 $3.37 $314,021 208,650 $2.96 $618,631 183,158 $3.05 $558,394

2.5%32-00-00 EXTERIOR

IMPROVEMENTS - Allow

200,000 $5.00 $1,000,000 666,000 $6.11 $4,069,756 93,225 NIC 208,650 NIC 183,158 $10.00 $1,832,259

33-00-00 MECH-UTIL.-Ref to Detail 200,000 $1.60 $320,000 666,000 $3.27 $2,176,907 93,225 NIC 208,650 NIC 183,158 $3.19 $584,984

33-00-00 ELEC-UTIL.-Ref to Detail 200,000 $3.63 $726,000 666,000 $332.71 $221,582,732 93,225 $239.85 $22,359,824 208,650 $253.27 $52,844,338 183,158 $328.46 $60,160,703

200,000 $298.01 $59,196,000

5.0% CONTINGENCY 200,000 $14.80 $2,960,000 Clarifications Regarding Benchmark Construction Cost at Award:CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 200,000 $312.81 $62,156,000 *Normalized Costs= All Costs have been escalated to today's cost (10/1/11) and have been area factored to Kansas City, KS.

310.78$

Exclusions: Sales Tax.

Owner related FF&E ROM $2,591,000

Moving of existing spaces / furniture and all related move management & temporary sw ing spaces needed during move. Decommission & Building Removal of the existing plant

Conduit & Cabling ONLY is provided for Data & AV and therefore the estimate excludes all: Monitors, Servers, Racks, Security Cameras, Security Hardw are, Communication Devices.

Systems Clarification Notes. -Unless Noted Otherwise Systems SF $s are based upon Normalized Benchmarking Average Attached.

WBS-01 12.5% to Provide GC /CM Fee & OH&P, General Conditions, General Requirements, Insurances & Permitting. Includes minimal temporary Winter protection.

WBS-02 Existing Conditions Excludes Building Removal 03

07 30% Exterior Metal Panels on Metal Stud + Louvers (Total Exterior WSF based upon take-off) + Roofing+ Insulation+5,000 SF Soffit

WBS-08 70% Exterior -Curtain Wall. Interiors include Doors & Interior Glazing 11 Equipment Includes - Includes all Casew ork Built-Ins Including Simulation Areas and Kitchen Equipment - Refer to Programmatic Equipment Pricing Sheet

WBS-13 Includes - 1,000 SF Canopy & 750 LF Prefabbed Sun Shades 12 Furniture - Includes all Built-in Seating and Allow ance for Window Treatments & Matts - Refer to Programmatic Furniture Pricing Sheet

WBS-14 Based upon 6 Stop EGT Elevators - 2 -Passenger Elevators 1 Service - Excludes a Pneumatic Tube System

WBS-31 Includes Basement Excavation & Site Stripping WBS-32 Allow ance of 2.5% of Construction Cost

Hazardous Material Removal and Excavation.

Concrete includes conventional spread footers, SOG & composite deck concrete .

666,000 BGSF 93,225 BGSF 208,650 BGSF 183,158 BGSF

All ow ner Soft Costs not limited to: Financing, Admin., A/E Fees, Professional Fees, Land Acquisition, FF&E; Loose Kitchen Equipment, Lab Equipment (Sterilizers, Centrifuges, Equipment Washers, Carts,

Diagnostic Instruments, Counter Top Equipment, Microscopes, Endoscopes, Glassw are's, Cages, Racks, Freezers), Desks, Tables, Chairs, Task Lighting

Mo, St. Louis Buffalo, NY Topeka, KS KS, Kansas City

November-07 June-08 June-04 January-10

Adjusted Benchmark Model *Normalized Cost Models

Kansas University Medical Center

Kansas City, KS

October-11

200,000 BGSF

Washington University School of

Medicine BioMed

D'Youville College Academic Building University of Kansas - Bio-Medical

Research Center

University of Kansas Health Authority -

MOB

COST ESTIMATE





ANALYSIS 3.0

MASTER PLAN 4.0


APPENDIX 6.0


APPENDIX

CURRENT DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPUS FUNCTIONS

Building Name Constr. Add'n. GSF Occupant Approx. % Function Comments

Murphy 1924 51,256 KUMC 100% Administration

Wahl Annex 1928 1937 17,877 KUMC 100% Support

Outreach

Wescoe Pavilion (B) & (C) 1928 1967 103,294 School of Medicine 65% Faculty Offices

1936 School of Health Professions 5% Research Labs

Hospital Authority 30% Clinics

Hixon 1936 21,585 School of Medicine 100% Research

Sudler 1936 1949 95,754 School of Medicine 65% Faculty Offices

School of Health Professions 10% Classroom Labs


Delp Pavilion (D) 1939 1967 118,177 School of Medicine 70% Faculty Offices

School of Health Professions 10% Classrooms

Hospital Authority 20% Inpatient Rehab Clinics

Eaton 1940 34,408 School of Medicine 45% Faculty Offices

School of Health Professions 25% Clinic Labs


Wahl West 1953 69,014 School of Medicine 100% Research

Taylor 41,070 School of Medicine 12% Interdisciplinary Simulators

School of Health Professions 13% Classroom Labs

School of Nursing 13% Campus IT Infrastructure

KUMC 60%

Student Center 1954 1963 58,148 KUMC 100% Student Administration

Study Lounge

Student Health Services

Delp Pavilion 1954 1965 117,223 School of Medicine 60% Faculty Offices

School of Health Professions 5%

Support / Facilities

Management

Hospital Authority 35% Inpatient Rehab Clinics

Olathe Pavilion 1957 55,403 School of Medicine 30% Faculty Offices

School of Health Professions 10% Research Labs

Hospital Authority 60% Inpatient Pyschiatric Clinic

Robinson 1958 1968 62,100 School of Medicine 75% Library / Archives

School of Health Professions 25% Biostatistics

Faculty Offices

Children's Development

Unit 1959 27,552 School of Medicine 85% Faculty Offices

School of Health Professions 15% Clinics

Research Labs

Wahl East 1963 1974 126,751 School of Medicine 100% Research

Dykes Library 1983 59,064 KUMC 100% Library

Spencer Chapel 1967 2,811 KUMC 100% Chapel

Research Support Facility 1989 38,810 School of Medicine 100% Research

Smith West 1972 12,635 School of Medicine 40% Research


62


APPENDIX

CURRENT DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPUS FUNCTIONS

63


Smith East 1973 45,406 School of Medicine 100% Research

Breidenthal Annex 1970 7,920 Incubator 100% Research

Miller 1973 54,684 School of Medicine 70% Faculty Offices


Clinics

Applegate Energy Center 44,612 KUMC 100% Central Utility Plant

Breidenthal 1958 1973 40,620 Incubator 100% Research

Orr Major 118,157 School of Medicine 80% Classrooms

School of Health Professions 10% Student Groups / Lounge

Research Labs

Radiation Oncology 1980 22,995 Hospital Authority 100% Radiation Oncology

Kirmayer 1990 2000 55,336 KUMC 100% Fitness Center

Sutherland inst. 1994 19,515 School of Medicine 100% Clinics

Lied Biomedical 1994 80,250 School of Medicine 100% Research

Hemenway LSIC 2010 200,000 School of Medicine 100% Research

School of Nursing 2000 104,971 School of Nursing 100% Faculty Offices

Classrooms

Landon Center on Aging 2000 43,000 School of Medicine 100% Clinics

Hoglund 2005 12,200 School of Medicine 100% Clinics

Research


APPENDIX

DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPUS FUNCTIONS: FIVE YEARS OUT

Building Name Constr. Add'n. GSF Occupant Approx. % Function Function


Student Administration Relocated From Student Center


1936 School of Health Professions 5% Research Labs



School of Health Professions 10% Classrooms

Hospital Authority 20% Inpatient Rehab Clinics Relocated to Lane Four Site

Student Center 1954 1963 58,148 KUMC 100% Student Health Services


School of Health Professions 5% Support / Facilities

Hospital Authority 35% Inpatient Rehab Clinics Relocate to Lane Four Site

Olathe Pavilion 1957 55,403 School of Medicine 30% Faculty Offices


Hospital Authority 60% Inpatient Pyschiatric Clinic


School of Health Professions 25% Faculty Offices










Orr Major 103,800 School of Medicine 75% Classrooms / Class Labs Expand Anatomy; other renovations*

School of Health Professions 25% Student Groups / Lounge Student spaces to Medical Education

Research Labs Consolidated to other research buildings



Classrooms


Research

Medical Education Building 2014 135,000 School of Medicine 100% Classrooms

Educational Commons

Interdisciplinary Simulation

Administration

Parking Expansion TBD KUMC 100% 1,000+ Parking Space Capacity

Renovations currently under way will

increase the School of Public Health

within the building

64

Five Year Goals:

Create a new home for consolidated and expanded Medical Education.

Begin consolidation of School of Health Professions.


APPENDIX

DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPUS FUNCTIONS: FIVE YEARS OUT

65

*See detail on Orr-Major, pages 56-57 for specific information regarding the suggested renovation and re-purposing of the facility**The following buildings have no change in function as a result of this master plan: Hixon, Wahl West, Wahl East, Lied Biomedical, Hemenway LSIC, Wahl Annex, Sudler, Eaton, Taylor, CDU, Miller, Sutherland Institute, Spencer Chapel and Kirmayer Fitness Center.

School of Medicine Administration moves to Medical Education

Inpatient Rehab Clinic (Hospital) relocates to Lane Four

Student Groups and study spaces relocate from Orr-Major to new Medical Education Building

School of Health Professions functions in

Olathe relocate to vacated space in Student Center

Student Related Functions in Student Center

relocate to vacated space in Orr-Major


APPENDIX

DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPUS FUNCTIONS: 10 YEARS OUT



Student Administration


1936 School of Health Professions Research Labs Consolidate to Student Center



School of Health Professions Classrooms

Hospital Authority 20% Re-use of space TBD



Faculty Offices




Management


1957 55,403 School of Medicine Faculty Offices Moves with Inpatient Psych Clinic

School of Health Professions Research Labs Research to Student Center

Hospital Authority Inpatient Pyschiatric Clinic Future Location TBD



School of Public Health 25%

1983 2022 117,064 KUMC 50% Library Remain in place

School of Medicine 50% Faculty Offices Accommodate faculty growth








Orr Major 103,800 School of Medicine 60% Classrooms / Class Labs

School of Health Professions 40% Faculty Offices From Robinson; Consolidation



Classrooms


Research

Medical Education 2014 135,000 School of Medicine 100% Classrooms

Interdisciplinary Simulators

Administration

Parking Expansion TBD KUMC 100% 1,000+ Parking Space Capcity

Central Utility Plant (North) TBD Central Utility Plant Must precede any futher construction

Phase I Research Building 2022 280,000 School of Medicine 100% Research Labs

Research Faculty

Animal Facility

Olathe Pavilion

(Demolished)

Dykes Library

(Two Additional Floors)

Consolidate Health Professions Research

to Student Center; Faculty to Orr-Major

Accommodate growth; plan for

replacement of other obsolete facilities

66

10 Year Goals:

Expand office space to accommodate faculty growth.

Complete consolidation of School of Health Professions.

Begin divestiture from obsolete facilities.

Expand Research Facilities with new 280,000 GSF Building; move animal facilities from obsolete Research Support Facility.


SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED MASTER PLAN CHANGES

DISTRIBUTION OF CAMPUS FUNCTIONS: 10 YEARS OUT

67

**The following buildings have no change in function as a result of this master plan: Wahl Annex, Hixon, Sudler, Eaton, Wahl West, Taylor, CDU, Wahl East, Spencer Chapel, Miller, Kirmayer Fitness Center, Sutherland Institute, Lied Biomedical, Hemenway LSIC and Landon Center

School of Health Professions relocates student driven functions and faculty to Orr-Major; allows room for growth of School of Public Health

School of Health Professions vacates Wescoe by moving Research functions to Student Center

Inpatient Psych Clinic (Hospital) and Psychiatry

faculty vacate Olathe; Olathe can be demolished

Begin vacating Wescoe; Specific key faculty move to new

facilities north of 39th Street

Construct vertical expansion to accommodate faculty office space needs

Construct new research building with vivarium and expand Hemenway animal facility


APPENDIX

CAMPUS SNAPSHOT: 10-20 YEARS AND BEYOND



Student Administration

Wescoe Pavilion (B) & (C) 1928 1967 103,294 School of Medicine Faculty Offices

1936

Hospital Authority Clinics TBD

Delp Pavilion (D) School of Medicine Faculty Offices

Classrooms obsolete


School of Health Professions 60% Research Labs Consolidated from across campus




Management


Olathe Pavilion


School of Public Health 50% Faculty Offices

Classrooms


Spencer Chapel 1967 2,811 KUMC 100% Chapel

1989 38,810 School of Medicine Research Relocate to New Research Building

Smith West 1972 12,635 School of Medicine Research Relocate to New Research Building

(Demolished) School of Health Professions Relocate to New Research Building

Smith East (Demo'd) 1973 45,406 School of Medicine Research Relocate to New Research Building

Breidenthal Annex (Demo'd) 1970 7,920 Incubator Research Incubator Contract Expires


Breidenthal (Demo'd) 1958 1973 40,620 Incubator Research Incubator Contract Expires

Orr Major 103,800 School of Medicine 60% Classrooms / Class Labs


Radiation Oncology 1980 22,995 KUMC 100% TBD


Classrooms

Hoglund 2005 12,200 School of Medicine Clinics

Research

Medical Education Building 2014 135,000 School of Medicine 100% Classrooms

Interdisciplinary Simulators

Administration

Parking Expansion TBD KUMC 100% 1,000+ Parking Space Capacity

Central Utility Plant (North) TBD Central Utility Plant

Phase I Research Building 2022 280,000 School of Medicine 100% Research Labs

Research Faculty


Relocate to Hospital Phase I /

Collaboartive Building

Relocate to Hospital Phase I /

Collaboartive Building

School of Public Health will continue to

expand and replace other functions

Absorb within new Neuro Hospital or

create space in Collaborative Building

Consolidated from Robinson and other

building; Accommodate Growth


(Demolished)

68

20 Year Goals:

Finalize removal of obsolete buildings.

Maximizecollaboration with hospital programs.

Expand research facilities to accommodate growth.


APPENDIX

CAMPUS SNAPSHOT: 10-20 YEARS AND BEYOND

69

Relocate remaining faculty in Wescoe and Delp (D) Hoglund Imaging Center absorbed to higher utilization facility

Consolidate research space and vivarium from

obsolete facilities

Continue campus development northward

Street improvements current to 20 years and beyondDemolish scattered buildings; construct new multi-

disciplinary building to maximize collaboration with TUKH

Demolish remaining obsolete facilities; Complete

greenway connection through campus


FACILITIES CONDITION ANALYSIS CHART


APPENDIX

FACILITIES CONDITION ANALYSIS

71

Murphy

Wahl Annex

Wescoe Pavilion (B)

Sudler

Delp Pavilion (D)

Eaton

Architectural

Layout Structural

Mechanical

HVAC

Electrical

Systems

Fire Safety

Sprinkler

Overall

RatingExterior Shell

Hixon

Wescoe Pavilion (C)

KUMC Kansas City

Wahl West

Taylor

Student Center

Ratings Legend:

Satisfactory = Good condition, possibly needs some limited upgrade

Marginal = Significant upgrade is required

Inadequate = Should be removed from services

Not Included = Building not evaluated

Murphy

Wahl Annex

Wescoe Pav. (B)

Sudler

Delp Pav. (D)

Eaton

Wahl West

Taylor

Student Center

Wescoe Pav. (C)

Hixon


APPENDIX


72

Delp Pavilion (F)

Olathe Pavilion

Robinson

Dykes Library

Spencer Chapel

Research Supp. Fac.

Children’s Dev. Unit

Wahl East

KUMC Kansas City

Smith West

Smith East

Breidenthal Annex

Delp Pav. (F)

Olathe Pavilion

Robinson

Dykes Library

Spencer Chapel

Res. Supp. Fac.

Child. Dev. Unit

Wahl East

Smith West

Smith East

Breid. Annex

Ratings Legend:





Architectural

Layout Structural

Mechanical

HVAC

Electrical

Systems

Fire Safety

Sprinkler

Overall



APPENDIX


73

Miller

Orr-Major

Kirmayer Fitness

Supp. Services Fac.

Nursing Education

Sutherland Institute

Lied Biomedical

KUMC Kansas City

Landon Center

Hoglund

Hemenway LSIC

Applegate Energy

Breidenthal

Miller

Orr-Major

Kirmayer Fitness

Supp. Serv. Fac.

Nursing Educ.

Sutherland Inst.

Lied Biomedical

Landon Center

Hoglund

Hemenway LSIC

Applegate Energy

Breidenthal

Ratings Legend:





Architectural

Layout Structural

Mechanical

HVAC

Electrical

Systems

Fire Safety

Sprinkler

Overall



POTENTIAL EXPANSION OF

SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ANATOMY LAB

IN ORR-MAJOR


APPENDIX

GROSS ANATOMYWith the development of medical education for the 21st Century, KUMCwill continue to use gross anatomy as a key element of School of Medicinecurriculum. The University’s current facilities are outdated, overcrowded,and inadequate to serve the needs of a larger targeted class size. The EVCLeadership committee, KUMC Facilities Management and the design teamdetermined that the most suitable option for expansion of the grossanatomy facilities would be to occupy a renovated and dedicated spacewithin Orr-Major.

75

Orr-Major Fourth Floor (Potential Layout)

LABORATORY

CLASSROOM & FACULTY/TA WORKSPACE

SUPPORT/ PROCEDURES

STORAGE

Consolidate existing research labs to other campus research spaceand eliminate existing low-utilization classrooms; renovate Orr-Major fourth floor for Anatomy Labs

Remove isolated stair tower and corridor to allow more efficientuse of floor area

Create dedicated mechanical space and air handling unit foranatomy labs with existing mechanical functions on third floor

Existing cadaver processing systems in Wahl West and service toanatomy labs in Orr-Major is unaffected

Space available for expanded anatomy program: 12,950 NSF

Anatomy Labs 7,350 NSF

Support, Procedures, and Classrooms 5,600 NSF


DETAIL OF OBSOLESCENT BUILDINGS

EXISTING SPACE USE


APPENDIX


77

Olathe Pavilion 55,400 BGSF

Ground FloorSchool of Health Professions 2,850 NSF Cl inic Laboratory Science Offices , Health Service Resource Offices , OT Research Labs

Psychiatry & Behavior Science Offices 1,200 NSFContinuing Education Offices 575Facilities Management Shops and Offices 1,700

First FloorPsychiatry & Behavior Science Offices 9,700 NSF

Second FloorHospital Owned Offices 8,000 NSF+

Third FloorHospital Owned Inpatient Psych Clinics 8,100 NSF+


APPENDIX


78

Delp (D) 118,200 BGSFBasement LevelBusiness Center Shops & Storage 6,700 NSF

Ground FloorFamily Medicine Offices (Connected to Delp (F)) 200 NSFGeneral Clinical Research Center (GCRC) 5,500 NSFBusiness Center, Mail Services, Environmental Health & Safety 1,350 NSFHospital Owned Offices, Orthotics & Prosthetics Clinic 3,300 NSF+

First FloorFamily Medicine Offices & Research Lab 650 NSFMedicine Administration Faculty & Staff Offices, Class Lab 3,400 NSFRadiology Faculty & Staff Offices, Research Labs 3,650 NSFHuman Resources, Credit Union, Gift Shop 4,200 NSF

Second FloorInstructional Services Classroom 1,050 NSFSchool of Health Professions 3,000 NSF Anesthes ia Education Offices , Simulator

Gyn/Ob Offices, Medicine Administration Offices, Rehab Medical Education Offices, General Surgery Offices 1,950 NSFKUPI Offices 1,500 NSFHospital Owned Inpatient Rehab Clinic 1,550 NSF

Third FloorMedicine Administration Offices, Anesthesiology Offices 1,500 NSF+On-Call Resident Rooms: Medicine Administration, Neurology, Anesthesia Education 850 NSFENT Offices 4,300 NSF+Research Institute Offices 600 NSFHospital Owned Inpatient Rehab Clinic 2,550 NSF+

Fourth FloorSchool of Health Professions 2,400 NSF Dietetics & Nutri tion, Respiratory Care Education Offices

Medicine Administration Offices 5,600KUPI Offices 350 NSFHospital Owned Poison Control 1,250 NSF

Fifth FloorSurgery Orthopedics, Surgery Urology 4,750 NSFUnder Renovation (Add'l 900 NSF on Penthouse Level) 4,000 NSFHospital Owned Trauma/Burn Administration 900 NSF

*Several program functions occupy adjacent space in Delp (F) and Wescoe


APPENDIX


79

Wescoe 103,300 BGSFGround FloorSchool of Health Professions 1,450 NSF Dietetics , PT Research Labs

Medicine Administration Offices, Research Lab 900 NSFKUPI Research Lab 650 NSFEnvironmental Health & Safety Offices 1,428 NSFHospital Owned Rehab Services, Cancer Center Radiation Therapy 2,800 NSF

First FloorFamily Medicine Offices 1,400 NSFGME, Rehab Medicine Education, Neurology Offices 1,350 NSFMedicine Administration Offices, Research Lab 1,400 NSFHuman Resources, Chaplaincy 3,900 NSF

Second FloorInstructional Services Conference Rooms 6,100 NSFPharmacy School 300 NSFKUPI Offices 300 NSFHospital Owned Nursing, Executive Offices 7,200 NSF

Third FloorInstructional Services ITV Conference Room 300 NSFPediatrics Faculty Offices 2,150 NSFDiabetes Institute, Medicine Adminstration, Rural Medical Education, Research Institute Offices 1,150 NSFUnder Renovation 5,100 NSF

Fourth FloorMedicine Administration Offices, Research Labs 8,050 NSF

Fifth FloorPreventive Medicine, Research Institute Offices 1,100 NSFMedicine Administration Faculty Offices 2,200 NSFAcademic Affairs, Planning & Analysis 2,400 NSF

*Several program functions occupy adjacent space in Delp (D)


APPENDIX


80

Smith East 45,400 BGSFGround FloorMolecular Integrated Physiology 2,250 NSFPharmacy Practice Research Lab 500 NSF

First FloorInstructional Services Conference Room 700 NSFMolecular Integrated Physiology Resarch Labs, Cold Rooms 2,950 NSFGeneral Surgery Resaerch Lab 600 NSF

Second FloorSchool of Health Professions 1,500 NSF OT Research Labs

Molecular Integrated Physiology Research Labs 2,200 NSF

Third FloorFamily Medicine, Neurology Offices 450 NSFGynecology & Obstetrics Research Labs 3,900 NSF

Fourth FloorResearch Labs (Senior Dean of Research) 3,600 NSFPsychiatry Research Lab & Office 700 NSF

Fifth FloorAnimal Quarters Service 4,200 NSF

Smith West 12,600 BGSFGround FloorSchool of Health Professions 2,250 NSF Dietetics & Nutri tion Research Labs

First FloorSchool of Health Professions 1,800 NSF Speech & Hearing Research Labs

Research Labs (Senior Dean of Research) 1,800 NSFMolecular Integrated Physiology Office 150 NSF

Second FloorPediatrics Offices 1,650 NSFMedicine Administration Offices & Research Labs 750 NSF

facilities master plan - university of kansas facilities master plan is designed to facilitate ......

Documents