facilitating change skills resource handbook · page 4 tips for workshop facilitators get prepared!...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
Facilitating Change Skills
Resource Handbook
Page 2
Definitions of Facilitation
The word facilitates comes from the Latin facilis which means, "to make easy". The dictionary definitions vary; these are some examples:
"To free from difficulties and obstacles, to make easy"
"To ease the labour of, to assist the progress of"
"To render easier, to promote, help forward" Trevor Bentley defines facilitation as:
"The provision of opportunities, resources, encouragement and support for the group to succeed on achieving its objectives and to do this through enabling the group to take control and responsibility for the way they proceed" Training Officer, July/August 1994
Aims of intervention The following definitions offer ways of understanding the purpose and role of the facilitator. Schein:
"Process consultation is a set of activities on the part of the consultant that help the client to perceive, understand and act upon the process events that occur in the clients environment in order to improve the situation as defined by the client" From Process Consultation, Vol. 1, 1988
Argyris: 3 basic requirements of intervention
The generation of valid data Free, informed choice by the client These choices made by the client are done in such a way
that internal commitment to these choices is high From Intervention Theory and Practice, 1990 Nervis
1. The role of the consultant is to teach the client system those skills necessary for understanding the cycle of experience and for functioning better in carrying out the processes involved
2. In the process of helping the client system to improve its functioning, the consultant aims to provide a presence that is otherwise lacking
From Organisational Consulting: A Gestalt Approach, 1987
Page 3
The Facilitator
…focuses energy of the group on a common task
…suggests alternative methods and procedures
…protects individuals and their ideas from attack
…encourages everyone to participate
…helps the group find win/win solutions
…co-ordinates pre- and post-meeting logistics
Page 4
Tips for workshop facilitators
Get prepared! Research the material, write notes, plan the order of activities, imagine what could arise in terms of questions and challenge ... and think through strategies to deal with that.
You don’t need to be an expert on an issue, it is not important that you have all the answers. As a facilitator, your job is to guide participants through a process of exploring.
Believe that you can do a good job. If you don’t believe in yourself and your message, no one else will.
Don’t let the little things get you down. It is all right to make mistakes, we learn from mistakes.
Use positive body language: look at people when they are talking, use your hands freely to aid in your presentation, smile...
State the goals of activities or exercises. Participants need to know why they are doing something and what they can expect as the result from the activity.
Give the instructions carefully. Never ask participants: “Do you understand my instructions?”, but rather: “Have I given you clear instructions?”
Announce how much time participants have for an activity (“You have 5 minutes to make your list“) and remind them when the time is about to end (“You have 1 minute left to finish your task“).
Never say, “no” or “wrong” in reply to a participant’s response. For example, if you ask participants to think of a situation when they tried to influence someone and they describe a situation when someone tried to influence them, instead of telling them that you did not ask about that, say something like: “Yes, this is a good example of somebody trying to influence you, could you also think of an example when you tried to influence somebody?”
Don’t point. Instead, use an open palm, nod of the head, or best, say their name.
Compliment, then comment. Use expressions such as: “Thank you for this great idea!”, “This is a good time to bring that up, thank you! “, “You did a very good job with your list, let’s see if we can make it even more specific.”
Avoid handing out books and materials in the middle of an activity. They will read rather than participate.
Page 5
Difference between training and facilitation
The most common understanding of what a trainer does is very different to what a facilitator does.
TRAINING FACILITATION
Trainer starts from his/her own knowledge
Facilitator starts from the knowledge of the group
Trainer presents new information from the front of the room
Facilitator uses participatory methods – activities in which all members of the group participate
Information flows in one direction, from the trainer to the participants
Information flows in many different directions, between all members of the group – a true exchange of ideas
Trainer is concerned with participants understanding the right point of view
Facilitator encourages and values different views
Page 6
Three Steps to Facilitation Learning in Groups Taking things in, making sense of them and intervening
Step one: Taking things in
This involves observing and noticing what is going on in the group, both task and process, and what is going on in me as the facilitator, physically, emotionally and thought processes. There is a lot to observe in the group in terms of the task being completed and how the group is working together to complete the task. So, non-verbals, body language, eye contact, laughter, patterns of speaking, what is said, to whom, by whom, the quality of the listening and the atmosphere is important information to notice. Given the vast amount of data available to us, many facilitators concentrate on the group to such an extent that we may not notice the other main source of information about the group - what is happening to me as the facilitator? What physical sensations am I having, what emotions are welling in me, what feeling am I experiencing? Am I relaxed, tense, confused, full of energy, etc? If we pay attention to these feelings, they tell us much about the group. Perhaps the really good facilitator is the person who can pay attention to both dimensions at once, to self-awareness and group-awareness.
Step two: Making sense
This is a crucial stage of attempting to make sense of what has been noticed and observed. This is a refining process, which sifts and sorts - sees patterns and meanings. In this step the facilitator applies models, theories and past experience to the information observed. Facilitators must carry a well-stocked bag of models with which they are familiar so that, as random observations flood in, they are matched quickly against the available stock, hoping that some model will be in stock which makes sense of some of the observations. For example, if we have a theory about group development which involves a storming or control phase, we need not get too alarmed when issues of power and authority surface and our own role is questioned.
Self Knowledge
Self knowledge is diferent from the moment-by-moment self-awareness mentioned in "Taking things in". As facilitators, our underlying values shape the way we work with groups. It is not possible for us to facilitate a process without influencing that process by our own values, about how a group might function and work together, how people should behave with each other and how individuals should be in this world. The important thing is ‘facilitator know thyself’. When you want to take someone in on anger, can you make sense of that in terms of what you know about yourself?
Page 7
The dangers of interpretation
Interpretation can limit learning and is frequently inaccurate. To avoid interpretation entirely is impossible; we do it all the time and there is value in considering a range of possible interpretations. The danger lies in going all out on one favourite interpretation to the exclusion of all others. We must constantly check that it is really what we are observing that determines what sense we are making of the happenings in the group or whether the few theories/models we have are shaping and limiting how we are able to make sense of what is happening.
Step three: Intervening
The primary aim of intervening is learning. The facilitator's job, is therefore, to help the group "work well together", how that is defined, usually in terms of process and/or task, as well as to help individuals learn. So the first goal is group awareness and the facilitator has to assist the group members to answer a simple-sounding question: What is happening to the group? It is actually an extremely complex and difficult question and presents a paradox: How do you instruct people to be aware? The learning model this comes from is an ancient one: the tradition of encouraging learning, not by telling but by questioning, not by the teacher always being right, or by knowing the answer, but by the teacher demanding exploration and pushing for explanation. This is the Socratic tradition. However, Socrates never pretended to be ignorant and his disciples could ask him questions too, so that at the right time (and here is the skill) he laid before them his own understanding. It is a perfect learning model for facilitators, who have to decide when to lay bare for the group what they, as facilitators, have taken in and how they have made sense of it, and when to let the group struggle on independently. This requires a delicate balance between sharing your own insights and holding back. A simple framework to help decide what insights to share with the group are:
What I have taken from self What I have taken in from group What I have made sense of, from what I have taken in My interpretations
You do not have to demonstrate genius, conjuring up profound explanations for what is happening, nor do you have to make sense of everything you have taken in. You are also not the only person in the group who can make sense of things. In deciding what to share with the group, the single test is: will it help learning? Taken from "Facilitating Learning in Groups" by David Casey, Paul Roberts and Graeme Salamec published in Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 13,4
Page 8
Typical Roles Statements for the Facilitation Role Grid
Counsellor
"You do it: I will be your sounding
board"
Coach
"You did well; you can add this next
time"
Facilitator
"You do it: I will attend to the
process"
Teacher
"Here are some principles you can use to solve problems of this type"
Reflective Observer
"You do it: I will watch and tell you
what I see and hear"
Technical Advisor
"I will answer your questions as you
go along"
© Champion, Kiel and McLendon, 1985
Page 9
Phases of effective group work Putting the 'work' back into groups!
There are eight phases of effective group work. If any of these phases are missed, there is greater risk of dissatisfaction and unachieved outcomes. The phases are: 1. Planning & preparation
Content
Timescales
Resources
Methods
Facilitator & participants
Identifying stakeholders
Clarifying expectations 2. Contracting
Who does what
Roles and responsibilities 3. Task or purpose
What is to be done
Boundaries and outcomes of meeting 4. Clarification and definition
Are we all talking about the same thing?
Are we using language in the same way?
What is the "real" problem or issue?
What is, is not? 5. Exploration
Problem analysis
Generating options and alternatives 6. Convergence
Evaluation
Selecting key issues
Decision making
Action planning
Page 10
7. Closure
Summarising
Checking for commitment and understanding
Next steps 8. Follow up
Looking forward to any subsequent meetings
Ongoing support
Evaluation
What has happened as a result of this meeting/event? In practice the phases merge and overlap. The implications the facilitator needs to consider are:
Timing
Appropriate facilitation style
Types of activity
Group dynamics Effective facilitators also ensure sufficient time is invested in Phases 1 to 3, i.e. the contracting, purpose and clarification phases. All too often, groups quickly move into exploration and convergence without being really clear they are talking about the same thing.
Page 11
The Group Process 'Iceberg'
Content Topics
Subject
matter
Opinions
Views
Procedure Some options often used to give
structure to events:
Small group/syndicate work
Pairs
Brainstorm
Individual reflection/time out
Includes issues of:
Overall climate or atmosphere
Inclusion and exclusion
Power and status
Openness and trust
How people feel (about one another and the task)
What the overall climate/atmosphere is like
"hidden agendas"
often indicated by non-verbal behaviour
Process or dynamics
What the group is doing,
working on, the content of what
is being said.
How the group is organising
itself to carry out the task.
More visible and
up front
Often
below the
surface
What's happening
whilst the group is
working
Page 12
Prevention is better than cure
Effective facilitators invest time early on with themselves and with their groups, putting in place 'prevention(s)' that will enable the group to function effectively early on. 'Going slow now, to go faster later' is a key feature of good facilitation. Setting up 'prevention(s)' is analogous to servicing your car and planning your route before a long journey - it reduces the chance of breakdowns on the motorway later on! Examples of key 'prevention' activities include:
Clarifying the overall purpose of the group and the primary task of each meeting Specifying realistic outcomes and deliverables for each meeting Formulating a fall-back position in case the desired outcome is not reached Ensuring that all group members share the same meaning for important words and
phrases Offering a model or definition or process for the group to use as a common starting
point Clarifying administrative boundaries such as start and finish times, breaks, needs of
group members, conditions of attendance Allocating roles and responsibilities (e.g. scribe, timekeeper) to group members Inviting group members to air their concerns and expectations early on Arranging the layout of the room in a way that is conducive to the work of the group Setting up 'procedures' as to how the group will work together or handle difficult
issues, e.g.:
For dealing with conflict and disagreement
For expressing their feelings for using power constructively
How decisions will be made
How minority views will be handled/accommodated Confronting and encouraging group members to take responsibility for achieving the
group's outcomes This list is not exhaustive, nor will all activities be necessary every time. The key question to ask yourself is:
What needs to be in place now, to enable this group to work effectively later on?
Page 13
Who am I as a facilitator? Internal and External Dimensions
Driver Behaviour
Be perfect
Be strong
Hurry up
Please me
Try hard
Self talk
I'm not good at handling conflict
Beliefs - about self and
others
Emotions - own and others
Crumple buttons
(Triggers)
Fears and Anxieties
Judgement
A good group member is…
Individuals are difficult when
they…
Self confidence
Rules
As a facilitator
I must…
I should…
I ought…
Non-verbal behaviour Personal style
Skills
Physical presence
Energy Levels
Impact on others
Page 14
Contracting
A major part of setting up 'prevention(s)' is an explicit 'contract' the facilitator makes with the group. The contract specifies and clarifies the expectations both parties have of each other, i.e.: The role and responsibility of the facilitator The roles and responsibilities of other group members (particularly the manager) Procedural issues such as time commitments, administrative duties, meeting times
and venues, etc Process issues - how the facilitator will work with the group to facilitate group
process and progress, e.g. for making decisions, handling conflict, generating ideas. An explicit contract helps set out expectations between the facilitator and the group, communicates competence and professionalism, but most importantly legitimises interventions and confrontations the facilitator may make later on.
Page 15
Dimensions of Facilitation Effectiveness
Being
Values Assumptions about
people/reality/change The kind of person I fundamentally am
Natural self
Doing
Tools Techniques
Skills Competencies
Role
Presence Integrated Congruent
Walk the talk
Effective action
Page 16
Observing Group Dynamics Some key points to watch (and potentially incorporate in a group debrief)
Membership To what extent are group members included in the task? How do people include/exclude themselves? How do people include/exclude others? Are there sub-groups within the overall group/team? Influence How do people influence one another? Who is high in influence? Low in influence? How are decisions made in the group? How is leadership exercised in the group? What key acts of leadership did you observe? Climate What kind of atmosphere does the group generate? How does this change? How open are people in expressing:
Their thoughts and opinions
Their feelings What level of trust exists in the group?
Page 17
Facilitation and Stages of Group Development
Stage 1: Forming Key facilitator behaviours
Create safety and comfort
Make objectives and task demands clear and explicit
Help people feel included
Create opportunities for contact and time for people to get to know one another
Be directive without being authoritarian, create clear structures for meetings, the way the group or team is to work, that can evolve and change over time in which participation can occur
Be prepared to allow a degree of dependency on the facilitator
Take initiatives
Try and avoid being excessively anxious
Value previous experience of new group/team members Concerns and feelings
Am I going to be liked/accepted?
Do I need to be liked/accepted?
Are these the right people for the group/team?
How anxious do I feel?
Stage 2: Storming Key facilitator behaviour
Allow conflict to surface in the group; don't avoid, deflect, deny or reject conflict
Legitimate the expression of different opinions and feelings
Respond to challenges constructively
Don't give in to blackmail, threats
Accept responsibility for and confirm own facilitation
Encourage negotiation of responsibilities
Avoid scapegoating and polarisation
Differentiate between conflicts about task and interpersonal conflicts
Be clear about limits; what is and what is not negotiable
Try and take feedback seriously without collapsing under criticism
Distinguish between you and your role
Page 18
Concerns and feelings
Is this all going to fall apart?
Do I really know what I am doing?
How much should I stay in control?
Likely feelings of anger, frustration, resentment, apathy
Stage 3: Norming Key facilitator behaviours
Help create norms rather than rules
Make norms conscious and explicit
Allow norms to be created by the group/team as far as possible, not created entirely by facilitator
Be honest about own values and norms
Create climate where feedback can be more openly given and received
Build on and develop roles
Don't allow group/team to get too rigid about ways of doing things
Don't be reluctant to allow further autonomy and lose centrality of facilitator Concerns and feelings Likely feelings of relief, sense of progress and possible boredom now that life is more settled
Stage four: Performing Key facilitator behaviours
Challenge existing norms and assumptions
Develop creativity, allow room for mistakes and experimentation
Allow others to lead and/or facilitate, let go as far as possible of control
Create more sense of equality in team, partnership and interdependence
Don't allow team to get too cosy and internally focused - help them develop relationships with external individuals/teams/departments
Concerns and feelings
Feeling good, involved, committed, that the whole of you is being used
More able to relax with and enjoy the group or team
Excitement of achievement
Page 19
Stage 5: Mourning Key facilitator behaviours
Predicting varied individuals reactions to ending (sometimes endings trigger strong individual feelings)
Communicating maximum clarity about timing of end-point, letting people know of ending well in advance
Help create appropriate ending rituals, e.g. meals, parties…that have real meaning and are not going through the motions
Helping individuals and group/team learn from their work together as a whole; encourage reminiscing
Allowing and facilitating expression of the appreciation and acknowledgement of contributions within the group/team and towards the facilitator
Helping individuals plan and prepare for the future (e.g. next job, next project etc)
Create successful outcome(s) Concerns and feelings
Feelings of sadness at ending
Satisfaction with successful outcome(s)
Page 20
What is Process? Content What is being said or done?
Process How the 'what' is said or done
Words
Music behind the words Revealed non-verbally Reflects feelings of the person
From: E Schein, Process Consultation, Vol. 2 (1987) p39
"Process is everywhere. In order to help, intervene and facilitate human problem solving, one must focus on communication and interpersonal processes. The processes we need to learn to observe and manage are those that make a demonstrable difference to problem solving, decision making and organisational effectiveness in general."
"Understanding of human interpersonal and group processes is critical for the manager because effective managers spend far more time in intervening in how things are done than on what is done."
Page 21
Process Interventions Taken from "Unfinished Business" by Clark, Phillips and Barker (1984) Our working definition of a process intervention is any intervention made by the facilitator specifically, to affect directly:
The quality and nature of the relationship with the group
The feelings, behaviour, attitudes of the individual
The relationships between the facilitator and the group, or an individual within it
We can look at different levels of process Intrapersonal
Interpersonal
Group
Inter-group
Organisation
Page 22
Process interventions with groups Process interventions can be used with groups. The aim of the intervention(s) being to influence the quality of relationships within the group, including the relationship between the facilitator and the group. The group level interventions can be: Implicit e.g. comparing current group with past groups, or Explicit e.g. offering direct feedback on your perceptions of the group The process intervention you use with a particular group will depend on a number of factors:
The stage in the group’s development (see Schein's model of group development)
The experience of the facilitator(s)
The 'contract' you are working with
The structure of the meetings
"readiness" of the individual group members to respond There are additional risks attached to using process interventions at a group level compared with working individuals.
Conflict with individual members of the group who disagree with the facilitator's perceptions
Challenge from group members on 'how' the facilitator arrived at their perceptions
Criticism for taking an 'impersonal' stance in the group Given the risks, nevertheless, interventions at a group level are worth using as they can reduce tension in the group, offer a professional perspective on what is happening, offer support and reassurance and give ideas of alternative courses of action.
Page 23
Group interventions can be made in a number of different ways e.g.:
There and then "I thought the group handled the feedback session really well yesterday"
Here and now "What's happening in this group now" Directive "I want you to be more challenging with each other" Non-directive "You remind me of a group…" Interpretative "This group is avoiding making some key decisions" Descriptive "This is the third period of silence we have had in this
group" Negative "You are not challenging each other enough" Positive "I like the way you are supporting each other" Sharing feelings "I feel excited at the moment with what is going on" Not sharing feelings "Silence"
It is important that you give yourself the right to make group level interventions, these are often very useful in providing support/challenge to the group without putting pressure on particular individuals. Remember they should be used in conjunction with personal process interventions, not as an alternative to them.
Page 24
Intervention styles There / Then Reviewing: Activities Interviews Exercises Role plays Were you aware of your frown then? What was going through your mind then? Your voice was very quiet at that point
Here / Now How do you feel about that comment? What are you thinking now? What's your response to that feedback? What's going on for you now? What do you want to do? Can anyone here help you with that? Notice your non verbal response
Directive I want you to pay close attention to what's said Ask the group for feedback I want you to challenge any use of generalised
statements Be clear and direct in your comments Use "I" not one/people/all etc Look toward the group - describe what you see
Non Directive
What do you want to happen now? What options are there for you? Where would you focus your energies? What ideas spring to mind for you? How would you react to that statement When might you use this approach?
Interpretative You’re looking confused I don't think you’re listening You're avoiding the problem You seem to resent that statement I see you're getting angry
Non interpretative I notice you're frowning You use the word 'angry' often I see your colour has changed from pale to
quite red I was struck by the speed of your reply I'm conscious of the fact that you are not
looking at me while I'm speaking to you
Showing feelings I feel: Hurt Angry Isolated Full of energy Accepted Welcomed Happy Pleased to be here
Not showing feeling Silence Respond at content level Deflect using humour Rationalise / generalise
Page 25
Techniques for helping groups We have identified five main categories of facilitation techniques, and have listed specific techniques within each. The list is not exhaustive, but covers most of what we believe are the main techniques. In a way this is a variant of de Bono's 'Six Thinking Hats'.
Idea generation and categorisation methods
Metaphor
Re-framing
Draw a picture
Write a story
Make a myth
Build a collage
Brainstorming
Mindstorming
Clustering
Write ideas on 'post-its'
Magnetic hexagons Shifting state
Take a break
Energisers
Act out the problem
Sculpt it
Line up
Physical movement
Change seats
Work in bare feet
Write with your other hand
Problem analysis techniques
Force-field analysis
SWOT
Fishbone / cause-effect diagram
Mind-maps
Onion method Restructuring the group
Divide into pairs
Work individually
Break into syndicates
Create a sub-group task-force Verbal interventions
Summarise where we are now
Confront individuals who are obstructive
Disclosure 'How I'm feeling' 'This is where I'm at'
Diagnose the source of the block
Page 26
Bringing groups to closure
Another key skill of effective facilitators is the ability to bring group activity to an effective close. 'Effective' in this case means:
The group has achieved the outputs/outcomes it planned, to the satisfaction of its members
Or, having failed to achieved its outcomes, the group has an understanding about where it is and has a plan in place as to how it will achieve its outcomes next time
There is little or no 'unfinished business' in the group
The 'next steps' are clear for the group as a whole and the individuals within it Techniques for bringing closure
Summarising is the key to good closure
Summarise key points and action items, or ask someone else to summarise
Check with the group: 'Is there anything else'
Making a closing statement, e.g. 'Well, I sense from the group that we're about finished here"
Create a 'ritual' that will signal closure to the group, e.g. ask everyone to tell a 'good news' story
Where the meeting has been 'difficult', e.g. unresolved and unfinished business
Ask each member of the group to make a closing statement about where they are and how they feel
Invite the group to help you devise a way forward, e.g. 'In the five minutes we have left, I'd like you to suggest ways we could plan the next meeting so it will help us move forward'
State your own feelings and views, e.g. 'I feel vaguely dissatisfied about the way the meeting has gone. How is everyone else feeling?'
Common reasons for failing to achieve closure
Too many options
Unwillingness, inability to make a decision
Inadequately planned or unrealistic outcomes
Unfinished business within the group, e.g. strong feelings not accommodated, unresolved conflict
Introduction of new ideas or information at an inappropriate time, e.g. near the end of the meeting
Inadequate solutions to a messy problem
Page 27
Closure
Purpose To summarise To check for commitment and understanding To action plan To look ahead to next steps To clear up any 'unfinished business' ___________________________________________________________ Methods Specific things you can say or do Summarising
FFrom facilitator
"So the key decisions from this meeting have been…"
FFrom group
"In pairs, spend one minute discussing where you think we've got with this issue today, then we'll quickly hear from each pair" "Going around the group, let's hear from each person the one key thing they're going to do as a result of today's meeting"
Check level of achievement of outcome(s) Remind group of outcome (perhaps from a written statement on flipchart or handout). Ask to what extent that has been achieved. If not fully, ask how the outcome can now be achieved (e.g. outside meeting, follow up action, further meeting).
'Ritual' that signals the end of the meeting
Round robin of closing statement, e.g.
OOne thing I'm going to do as a result of this meeting
OOne thing I'm pleased with about today, one thing for us to do better next time
TThree words that describe how the meeting has been for me
Page 28
Action planning and looking ahead
CComplete framework of
What Who When How for further actions
Individual action points, discussed and thought through in pairs, then shared in fours, etc, etc, up to the whole group
Addressing unresolved issues and/or 'unfinished business'
"I feel vaguely dissatisfied about the way the meeting has gone. How is everybody else feeling?" Ask in final 5 minutes for ideas for making future meetings more productive or satisfying
Page 29
Clarification and definition Early stages of group work Purpose
To surface an issue
To make it OK to discuss it (legitimise)
To air different points of view
To avoid "perception wars"
To get group agreement to work on the problem Methods Specific things you can say or do Legitimise
AAccept v agreement
IIt’s OK to have or see the problem
"Why don't each of you take a minute or two to present your view of the problem. Let's not interrupt and at the end, only clarifying questions will be allowed. All right?" "Wait a minute Joe. That is how Mary sees the problem. You don't have to agree with her, but can you accept that she see it differently?" "It may not be a problem for you but do you understand it's an issue for him?" "How do you see the problem?" "It's natural. People see things differently depending on their point of view".
How does it feel?
GGetting at the affective or emotional aspect of the issue
LLegitimise feelings
"How does it feel to have to face that issue every day?" "You seem very upset. Why don't you take some time to share your feelings with the rest of the group?" "If you were she, how would you feel?"
Page 30
What's the 'real' problem?
SSpeaking the unspeakable
FFloating a trial balloon
"I don't get the feeling you've got to the real issue. What is the real problem?" "Is that the real problem?" "What's really going on?" "I may be really off base…but is the real issue about losing your jobs?"
Best, worst and most probable
BBacking in to the issue
"What's the best possible thing that might happen if we tackle this problem?…What's the worst possible thing that might happen?…What's the most likely? "If that happened, would that be so bad?" "OK, I understand that some of you have doubts about whether anything new will happen if we work on this problem. Are you willing to give it a try for the next few minutes?"
Whose problem?
GSetting ownership of the problem
NNot trying to solve someone else's problem
"Who's responsible for dealing with this problem?" "Can this group deal with this problem in this meeting?" "Who else should be involved?" "Can we tackle this problem today?" "Who has responsibility for this problem?" "What did you do that allowed this problem to become so difficult?…What could you have done to avoid the problem?"
Page 31
Skills for working with groups Foundation skills
Listening
Questioning
Articulation - expressing self clearly and concisely
Observation
Timing of interventions
Self awareness
Basic understanding of group dynamics Advanced skills
Dealing with ambiguity of role - Dealing with one's needs so they do not intrude/interfere - Acceptance of marginality of role
Ability to observe, understand and intervene at different levels in a group situation - Intrapersonal - Interpersonal - Group - Organisational/cultural
Understanding parallel process - I.e., how what happens to a consultant can mirror organisational processes
Flexibility of style having an increasing range about choices/intervention - E.g. along Heron's six dimensions - Or Schein's types of intervention
Having multiplicity of different models/orientations by which to understand, e.g. systems perspective/NLP/gestalt/psychoanalytical
Organisational sensitivity - Understanding of organisational culture - Awareness/impact of other aspects of organisation upon the group or team
Ability to discuss and negotiate appropriately management of the facilitating contract with the 'client'
Page 32
Facilitation Continuum Group Centred Facilitator Centred _________________________________________________________________________________________
Use of control by facilitator
Area of freedom for group
Facilitator uses inductive
question and answer to
"sell" an idea or concept
Facilitator presents ideas
or concepts and invites
responses; idea is
'considered' but not open
to rejection
Facilitator presents
subject, gets responses
and guides a group to a
conclusion
Facilitator defines
boundaries and asks
group to explore issue
Facilitator picks up
issues generated by
group and manages a
free discussion
Leading skills Leading and
shaping skills
Shaping skills
Shaping and
following skills Following skills
Page 33
John Heron's Facilitation Model From 'The Abridged Facilitator's Handbook' The six dimensions of facilitation The Planning Dimension
This is the goal orientated, ends-and-means aspect of facilitation; that is, it is to do with the aims of the group, and what programme it should undertake to fulfil them. The facilitative question here is; how shall the group acquire its objectives and its programme?
The meaning dimension
This is the cognitive aspect of facilitation: it is to do with participants' understanding of what is going on, with their making sense of experience, and with their knowing how to do things and to react to things. The facilitative question is; how shall the meaning be given to and found in the experiences and actions of group members?
The confronting dimension
This is the challenge aspect of facilitation: it is to do with raising consciousness about the group's resistance to and avoidance of things it needs to face and deal with. The facilitative question is; how shall the group's consciousness be raised about these matters?
The feeling dimension This is the affective aspect of facilitation: it is to do with the management of feeling within the group. The facilitative question is; how shall the life of feeling within the group be handled?
The structuring dimension
This is the formal aspect of facilitation: it is to do with methods of learning, with what sort of form is given to experiences within the group and with how they are to be structured. The facilitative question is; how can the group's learning experience be structured?
The valuing dimension
This is the integrity aspect of facilitation: it is to do with creating a supportive climate which honours and celebrates the personhood of group members; a climate in which they can be genuine, disclosing their reality as it is, keeping in touch with their true needs and interests. The facilitative question is; how can such a climate of personal value, integrity and respect be created?
Page 34
The three modes of facilitation Each of the above six dimensions can be handled in three different ways. It is one of these three ways which will provide the answer as to who should make decisions on each dimension. The hierarchical mode
Here the facilitator directs the learning process, exercising power over it and doing things for the group: the facilitator leads from the front by thinking and acting on behalf of the group.
The co-operative mode
Here the facilitator shares power over the learning process and managing the different dimensions with the group: s/he enables and guides the group to become more self-directing in the various forms of learning by conferring with them. S/he prompts and helps group members.
The autonomous mode
Here the facilitator respects the total autonomy of the group: s/he does not do things for them, or with them, but gives them freedom to find their own way, exerting their own judgement without any intervention.
Page 35
Communications
The following ideas are based on Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) types.
When presenting to, influencing, explaining to, or trying to understand:
SENSORS
INTUITIVES
Be factual
Document successful applications
Reduce risk factors
Work out details in advance
Show why it makes sense
Give the global scheme
Don’t let an opportunity pass
Be confident and enthusiastic
Indicate challenges
Point out future benefits
THINKERS
FEELERS
Be logical
State principles involved
Stress competent handling of issue
Have clear arguments
List the costs and benefits
Mention other supporters / use testimonials
Be personable and friendly
Indicate how it is helpful
Tell why it’s valuable to people
Show how it supports personal goals
HOW TO PERSUADE STs
Show me that it works
Indicate how it saves time and money
Demonstrate a good cost-to-benefit ratio
Show how the results can be measured
Allow me to try it before I buy it
Offer specific applications and benefits
Answer all my questions
Page 36
HOW TO PERSUADE SFs
Indicate its practical results for people
Show how it will clearly benefit me and those I care about
Use personal testimonies from those who have benefited from it
Show that it provides immediate results
Set it in a personal context
Show respect to me and others in your presentation
Explicitly state the benefits; don’t just imply them
HOW TO PERSUADE NFs
Show how it will enhance relationships
State how it helps people grow and develop
Focus on my own and others’ giftedness
Show how it gives new insights and perspectives
Indicate that people will like it, and, by implication, will like me
Point out how it will help me find meaning
Say it’s enjoyable and fun
HOW TO PERSUADE NTs.
Discuss its research base
Highlight its theoretical background
Demonstrate how it fits a strategy
Show how it will increase competency
Indicate its broad and far-reaching possibilities
Show that it has intriguing and fascinating possibilities
Page 37
Influencing strategies for facilitators
Many facilitators underestimate the need for choosing an influencing strategy when they are engaged with a group. They mistakenly imagine that we are always using the same style when we are facilitating for learning. In fact, we can move up and down a continuum which runs from teaching through to pure facilitation, where the facilitator’s influence is minimal.
Influencing Strategies
Directive Participative
Teaching Facilitating
Push Build
A typical “Push”, or teaching approach is characterised by:
Mostly one-way communication
Confidently presented
Short (<20 mins.) and to the point
Logically structured
Clear visual aids
Firm conclusions.
When done well this approach can be efficient, clear and appreciated by a group, who are looking for the expert opinion on a matter.
The danger of excessive "push" is that it can provoke active or passive resistance from other parties; you must have sat through presentations where perceived arrogance from the presenter was met with a quietly hostile response in the audience.
A typical “Build”, or facilitation approach is characterised by:
Two-way communication
Active involvement of the group
The structure and pace is determined by the needs of the group. More time may be spent where the group need it.
No conclusions or recommendations from the facilitator. These are generated by the group itself.
The group maintains responsibility for the solution or outcome.
The facilitator’s responsibility is for the process, not the content.
Page 38
The facilitation approach can be a very powerful way to engage people and gain their full commitment. The only potential disadvantage is that it is a more time-consuming process, so people may get impatient if they believe that all that is necessary is to hear the expert’s opinion. Nevertheless, when facilitation is used for learning, it can enable the learning to stick in a more permanent way than teaching can because people have been involved in the process of coming to conclusions.
FACILITATORS NEED FLEXIBILITY
Even if we accept that true learning probably occurs more through a facilitated approach than a teaching approach, nevertheless there may be moments when facilitators need to move more towards the directive end of the continuum. When groups are very inexperienced, sometimes the instructions given by a directive facilitator can help give them some structure and discipline.
Here is a guide to when you can push and when you are better off building:
THE CONTINUUM OF INFLUENCING STRATEGIES
Directive Push
Participative Build
Confident body language and voice Rapport and matching
Logical arguments Careful questioning
Structured presentations Extensive preparation
Expert opinion Coalition building
Proposing your ideas and solutions Incorporating ideas of others
Talk more than listen Listen more than talk
Criteria for use: Criteria for use:
High credibility Low to medium credibility
You are the accepted expert Resistance may occur
One right answer Complex matter
It is sufficient for people to understand
The group must own the process
Only need approval/acceptance Need participation/full buy-in
Neutral environment Emotionally tense/hidden agendas
Page 39
Being Aware of Your Natural Preference
You will probably have an inherent preference either for "push" or "build", regardless of the situation; this is a question of personal style. In order to be successful, you will need to develop your skills across the whole continuum, so that you can use both push and build effectively.
Using the wrong style in the wrong moment can lead to some undesirable outcomes:
Using push, when you should be building Resistance (maybe even sabotage, in the worst cases.)
Using build, when you should be pushing Loss of credibility, wasting time, inefficiency.
THE IMPACT OF CULTURE IN INFLUENCING
Clearly culture plays an important role in determining which behaviours will work in which situations. A skilful influencer is also someone, who has a good sensitivity for cultural differences and can adapt his style accordingly. Here are some of the key areas where culture can affect your choice of push or build:
Power Distance Differences
In high power distance cultures, there is a big gap between the people at the bottom of the hierarchy and those at the top. The ones at the top are the decision-makers and the ones further down are the implementers. Communication runs from top to bottom. People tend not to challenge the opinions of people who are higher in the hierarchy. Consequently, if you are in a position of authority in this culture people will expect to see, and will tolerate, a lot of push behaviour. In a low power distance culture, the inverse is true. In this culture there is very little difference between the top and the bottom. The mentality of people in this culture is that everyone is entitled to an opinion, whatever their level. People tend to challenge and question frequently. These cultural differences influence how groups will perceive the facilitator. In high power distance cultures, the facilitator often has authority just because of their role as facilitator. People may expect therefore that this person brings expertise and answers. They may resist being asked to participate in the process. In low power distance cultures, people may resent a facilitator, who does not ask for the group’s opinions or input.
Working in a high power distance culture does not automatically mean that you must always teach. Sometimes people could benefit from a more facilitative approach. You simply need to be aware that they may not be used to the idea that everyone’s idea is equally valid and the facilitator does not provide all the answers.
Page 40
Direct/Indirect Communication Styles
Some cultures tend to communicate very directly. People tend to pass a message in the most concise, simple format possible. We often refer to these cultures as low context because you do not have to understand the context, or have a relationship with the people involved, to understand the communication. The communication is all contained in the message. Typical low context cultures are US, NL, DK, S, CH, Germany. These cultures look for efficiency in communication and will appreciate the directness of a push strategy, providing of course, that the other criteria for using push are fulfilled.
On the other hand, high context cultures, which include the Arab world, and most of Africa, Southern Europe and Belgium, operate differently. Here it is desirable to have lots of discussion before a decision is made. Great importance is placed on relationship-building. There is a good reason for this because in these cultures the communication is not just in the message you hear. You are expected to read between the lines because you know the people and you understand the context. A very fast push strategy may be interpreted in these cultures as being too impersonal.
Page 41
The Facilitator’s Toolbox This section covers the following techniques:
1. Generating and collecting ideas 2. Organising ideas 3. Making decisions 4. Passing on information or ideas 5. Problem-solving 6. Parking lot 7. Energisers
1. Generating and collecting ideas Probably the best known technique for this is brainstorming.
Advantages Disadvantages
Easy to apply, many people know this technique Fast and efficient Usually generates large numbers of ideas to choose from
Is not necessarily the best techniques for introverts Works less well when the topic is controversial or people are scared to say what they really think
The rules of brainstorming:
Quantity breed quality – go for lots of ideas Hitch-hike other’s suggestions – build on ideas Freewheel – make changes in direction Postpone judgement – evaluation comes later Be succinct – each idea expressed in maximum of 7 words
Other variations on brainstorming There may be situations where you fear that people will not say what they really think. Perhaps they are scared of looking stupid in front of the group or maybe the issue is a controversial one and people do not dare express an opinion for fear that they are associated with that point of view and even sanctioned for daring to express it.
Page 42
In these cases, it is better to use either:
Small group discussions with a summary report from each group Individuals write their ideas on post-its or small cards and stick them
anonymously on to boards around the room.
2. Organising Ideas – Metaplan or affinity diagrams Metaplan or affinity diagrams are two names for the same technique of organising information into clusters. Writing on small cards or post-it notes during the brainstorming session has the advantage of making it easier to organise ideas later. Even when the brainstorm is a collective one, you may still consider using cards or post-its. When organising ideas, ask the group to scan all the cards in silence and move them together into clusters of similar themes. It is best when people do not discuss during the process. The process is over when everyone stops moving cards around. At this point you, the facilitator, may comment on what you observe has happened in this exercise. You can comment on the process and also on the outcome. You may propose (or ask the group to come up with) titles for the various clusters that have emerged. 3. Decision-making When the Metaplan is complete, you may need to decide which course of action you will pursue. It may be a matter of prioritising the clusters you have generated to decide which topics you will work on first. It may be a matter of choosing the one best cluster of ideas to develop further. In either case, majority voting tends to work best with these kinds of decisions where there is a lot of information to choose from. The easiest way to organise voting with the Metaplan system is to give each participant four or five votes that they can distribute over the list of suggestions as they so wish. The votes may be given in the form of sticky dots, which they can physically stick on their preferred items. Alternatively, you may ask people to make pen marks next to the suggestions they want to vote for. People may put all of their votes on one item or distribute their votes over several items.
Page 43
Majority voting vs. consensus decision-making
Majority voting Consensus
Fast and efficient May be very time-consuming and frustrating process
Enables the group to move on, but people may not all be delighted with the result
High level of commitment to the decision once it has been reached
Easy to facilitate Takes a lot of skill on the part of the facilitator to draw out people’s concerns and reach true consensus
Can be used as a stepping stone to break a deadlock on the way to reaching consensus
All or nothing – either you have consensus or not
Consensus decision-making
As we have seen, this can be a much more difficult way to get a decision, but is critical when all the members of the group need to defend this decision and be fully committed to its implementation. As the facilitator, ask the following questions:
Can you live with this action?
Will you support this action within the group?
Will you support this action outside the group? If anyone cannot answer yes to all these questions, ask…. What has to change for you to be able to support this decision? When a decision has been reached, confirm this to the group and check once again that everyone is in agreement. For consensus decision-making it may be useful to have a contingency plan, in other words what will we do if we cannot reach consensus in the time allocated?
Page 44
4. Passing on Information One of the techniques that you can use for teaching concepts or passing ideas around the whole group is third party teaching.
Split the group into sub-groups, working on different topics or different aspects of the same topic.
Groups brainstorm at their own flipchart to produce the answer to the question or an explanation of the issue as they see it.
At the end of the brainstorm, each sub-group selects a presenter, who will present this to the next group.
All groups rotate so that they visit the next flip-chart and hear their presentation. At the end of the presentation, a new presenter is chosen and the rest of the
group rotates around. Rotate until each group has been to each flipchart. This is a powerful technique for learning, as people are forced to explain
something that they have listened to. It tests their listening skills and their ability to assimilate the information and pass it on.
5. Problem-solving Techniques “The greatest challenge for any thinker is stating the problem in a way that will allow a solution” Bertrand Russell First define the problem. This step often determines how successful the group will be in finding a solution. There are different techniques, depending on how much creativity is required. One analytical, “left-brain” option is the grid overleaf:
The problem is…… The problem is not…..
Who
When
Where
What
How it is manifested
Page 45
How to….. A more creative, right-brained approach is to ask the group to reformulate the problem in a range of “how to…” statements. For example, if the problem were “solve the traffic congestion problems in London”, the group may reformulate as:
How to ensure the traffic flows more smoothly around the city
How to encourage people to use other means of transport
How to get people out of the city centre
How to have fewer cars on the roads Etc. This may already stimulate some new ways of looking at the problem, which could contribute to its solution.
Why-Why Diagrams
This involves asking the question why as many times as possible. For example: Problem = delays in the project
1. Why?……unreliable contractors….. 2. Why?……contractors do not read the briefing we give them…. 3. Why?……the briefings are long and written in complicated English… 4. Etc.
Fishbone Diagrams
These “whys” can also be represented on a fish-bone diagram, which shows all the potential root causes to a problem. Parking Lot This is a good tool to keep the session focussed on the issues at hand and yet not lose sight of other important points that may be raised. Whenever someone raises an issue, which is worthy of discussion, but does not fit with the topic being discussed at that moment, you may agree to “park” that issue and come back to it later. Simply set up a sheet of paper, which is designated as the parking lot. Issues can be posted there at any moment and then dealt with when the moment is right.
Page 46
6. Energisers These are exercises used at particular moments of the day to keep the energy levels high. They may be activities that in themselves have a link to the theme of the workshop, or they may be simply opportunities to move around and get people’s blood circulating.
Page 47
De Bono's - 6 Hats This technique can be used to maximise diverse thinking in a group. Participants are allocated different ‘hats’ and asked to ensure they contribute from the perspective of the hat wearer. This can also be a useful structure for looking at how a group works together, what perspectives they mostly use and what gaps there might be in their thinking and working.
White Hat Information needed, facts
Yellow Hat Brightness & optimism
Black Hat What may not work, difficulties & dangers
Red hat Feelings, hunches - express emotions
Green Hat Creativity, possibilities, alternatives
Blue Hat Process, control
Page 48
Personal
development
Support and
challenge
On going
development
Personal awareness
Style
Patterns of operating / triggers
Fears / anxieties, blocks, who am I?
Ethics / integrity
Positive integration
Role
Purpose
Limits?
Why? - whose request?
Expectations of the group?
Power - perceptions of their and ours
When / how to use appropriately
Picking things up
Observation skills
Using all our senses
Intuition
Engaging
Energy / focus
Conscious / unconscious data gathering
Making sense
Understanding how groups work
Theories / frameworks / experience
Psychology
Individual behaviour and group behaviour
Our toolkit
Contracting
Structure / design / stages
Interventions - range and
flexibility
Techniques and methods
Difficulties
How I manage myself to work
effectively
Positive anchors
Mapping Facilitation Skills
Page 49
Reading List
Consulting skills and facilitation
Flawless Consulting (1981) By Peter Block (Pfeiffer) The Facilitators Handbook (1990) By John Heron (Kogan Page) Process Consultation, Volumes 1 & 2 (1988) By Edgar Schein (Addison-Wesley) A Consultancy Approach for Trainers (1989) By Keri Phillips and Patricia Shaw (Gower) Client-centred Consulting (1992) By P Cockman, B Evans and P Reynolds (McGraw-Hill) Organisational Consulting - A Gestalt Approach (1987) By Ed Nevis (Gardner Press) Changing Perspectives on Facilitation Skills Development By Midi Berry (Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol 17, No 3, 1993) Practical Guide to Facilitation Skills - a real world approach (1993) By Tony Spinks and Phil Clements (Kogan Page) Group Facilitation - theories and models for practice (1993) By John Heron (Kogan Page)