facial fractures: demographics and injury patterns in a level 1 trauma center
TRANSCRIPT
Oral Abstract Track 2
References:
1. Shanti RM, Ziccardi VB: Use of Decellularized Nerve Allograft for
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Reconstruction: A Case Report. JOMS 69:550-
553, 2011
2. Brooks DV, Weber RV, Chao JJ, et al: Processed Nerve Allografts for
Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study of Utilization and
Outcomes in Sensory, Mixed, and Motor Nerve Reconstructions. Micro-
surgery 1-14, 2011
BDNF Gene Transfer PromotesRegeneration After Rat Facial NerveCrush Injury
B. E. Yang: Hallym University School of Medicine
Although facial nerve injury is seldom a complication
of dentoalveolar surgery, transient Bell’s palsy may follow
an inadvertent injection of local anesthetic into the
parotid gland and its superficial location make it liable
to be injured during dental treatment. A variety of
methods are used in the treatment of facial palsy.
However, there is no simple and effective treatment for
this problem up to now.Objectives:Damage to the facial nerve produces weak
muscles of facial expression. Facial nerve crush model
was designed and nerve recovery was evaluated using
BDNF gene transfer.
Materials and Methods: A crushed injury was made
with hemostat to create axonotmesis on the right facial
nerve main trunk in rats. Adenoviral BDNF (BDNF-Ad)
was injected into the experimental group andsaline was injected for the control group. Regeneration
was evaluated with functional test (vibrissae and
ocular movement), electrophysiologic (threshold volt-
age, peak voltage, conduction velocity) and histomorpho-
metric study.
AAOMS � 2013
The t-test was used to compare the mean score of the
electrophysiology test and axon density results in thesame day. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare
the mean score of functional test in the same day. For
analysis of experiments involving time, one-way ANOVA
was used to determine the mean score of the electrophys-
iology test results and the axon density measurements.
The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the mean
score of the functional test results on the same day be-
tween the control and experimental groups. A value ofp < 0 .05 was considered significant.
Results: Functional test score, threshold and conduc-
tion velocity improved with time in both groups. How-
ever, axon density increased significantly only in the
experimental group. Functional tests at 10 and 20 days
showed no difference. Vibrissae movement, threshold,
conduction velocity and axon density at 30 days revealed
that the degree of regeneration in the experimental groupwas significantly superior. The degree of nerve regenera-
tion in the BDNF-Ad group was significantly higher dur-
ing the 30 days of analysis, and functional recovery
after facial nerve crush was obtained 30 days.
Conclusion: Despite the lack of long-term effective-
ness, the present study demonstrates that the administra-
tion of BDNF using an adenoviral vector accelerates
nerve regeneration for a period of 30 days followingcrush injury.
References:
1. Zhang JY, Luo XG, Xian CJ, Liu ZH, Zhou, XF: (2000): Endogenous
BDNF is required for myelination and regeneration of injured sciatic
nerve in rodents. Eur J Neurosci 12, 4171-4180
2. Hadlock TA, Heaton J, Cheney M, Mackinnon SE: (2005): Func-
tional recovery after facial and sciatic nerve crush injury in the rat.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 7, 17-20.
Oral Abstract Track 2
TRAUMA, ORTHOGNATHIC, COSMETIC, OSA
October 10, 2013 7:00 AM-9:00 AMFacial Fractures: Demographics andInjury Patterns in a Level 1 Trauma Center
R. Garza III: Allentown, PA, J. M. Adkinson, J. N. Gilstrap,
N. F. Miller, S. M. Eid, R. X. Murphy Jr
Purpose:With increasing age, an individual’s potential
for exposure to various mechanisms of trauma may
change. This may impact the types of facial fractures sus-
tained and the likelihood for surgical intervention. The
objective of this study is to examine the impact of patient
demographics on facial fractures at our Level 1Trauma Center.
Method: An IRB-approved review of the Network
Trauma Registry from 2006-2010 was performed: age,
sex, mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow
Coma Score (GCS), blood alcohol level (BAL), length of
stay (LOS), type of facial fracture (nasal, maxillary/malar,
orbital, mandible), and operative intervention were docu-mented. A logistic regression was performed using SPSS
15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).
Result: The database identified 23,318 patients; 1,686
patients with facial fractures with 910 patients sustaining
2,094 fractures by MVC, fall, or assault. This cohort in-
cluded 866 nasal, 504 malar/maxillary, 434 orbital, and
290 mandible fractures sustained in 509 MVC, 229 falls,
e-15
Table 1Facial Fracture Rate By Age Group
Fracture Type
Age Group (years) Nasal (n=866)** Malar/Maxillary (n=504)* Orbital (n=434)*** Mandible (n=290)*
<18 82 (48.8%) 37 (22.0%) 54 (32.1%) 47 (28.0%)18-44 370 (53.6%) 237 (34.4%) 190 (27.5%) 195 (28.3%)45-64 227 (60.9%) 159 (42.6%) 99 (26.5%) 53 (14.2%)65-79 132 (61.4%) 75 (34.9%) 72 (33.5%) 21 (9.8%)80-89 109 (58.0%) 60 (31.9%) 66 (35.1%) 14 (7.4%)90+ 37 (71.2%) 11 (21.2%) 11 (21.2%) 4 (7.7%)Total 957 (56.8%) 579 (34.3%) 492 (29.2%) 334 (19.8%)
*p<0.0001 **p=0.007 ***p=0.087
Oral Abstract Track 2
and 172 assaults. Nasal fractures were the most common
injuries sustained by all age groups (56.8% of all patients).
Mandible fractures were the least frequently sustained fa-
cial fracture in patients older than 45yo, and decreased
dramatically in the subset older than 80yo (p<0.0001).
There was no age-related statistically significant differ-
ence in the likelihood of sustaining an orbital fracture(p=0.087) (Table 1). Patients in the 18-44yo age group
had a statistically significantly higher ISS, BAL, and LOS
(p<0.001). 23.8% of patients underwent surgical
intervention and this peaked in the 18-44yo age group
(p<0.001) (Table 2). With increasing age, facial
fractures from MVC decreased, while fractures
Table 2Facial Fracture Surgical Intervention By Age Group (p<0.001)
Age Group(years)
SurgicalIntervention
No SurgicalIntervention Total
<18 45 (26.8%) 123 (73.2%) 168 (100.0%)18-44 223 (32.3%) 467 (67.7%) 690 (100.0%)45-64 88 (23.6%) 285 (76.4%) 373 (100.0%)65-79 33 (15.3%) 182 (84.7%) 215 (100.0%)80-89 12 (6.4%) 176 (93.6%) 188 (100.0%)90+ 1 (1.9%) 51 (98.1%) 52 (100.0%)Total 402 (23.8%) 1284 (76.2%) 1686 (100.0%)
Figure 1 Mechanism of Facial Fracture By Age Group (p<0.0001)
e-16
sustained in falls increased. Assaults peaked in the 18-
44yo age group (p<0.0001) (Figure 1).
Conclusion: Age is associated with differences in the
type of facial fractures sustained, mechanism of injury,
and the likelihood for surgical intervention. These data
emphasize the need to customize prevention strategies
and appropriately allocate healthcare resources for pa-tients within different age stratifications.
A Numerical Model to Simulate CombatNeck Injury From Perforating ExplosiveFragments
J. Breeze: Royal Centre for Defence Medicine
Statement of Problem: Neck injuries from explo-
sively propelled fragments are present in 11% of injured
UK soldiers and result in significant mortality and long-
term morbidity. US forces in contrast only sustain neck
wounds in 3-4% of those injured, which is believed to bedue to their greater acceptance in the wearing of issued
neck protection. A numerical simulation of the neck is de-
sired to simulate suchwounds so that potential methods of
injury mitigationmay be objectively compared. The aim of
this research is to develop an accurate numerical simula-
tion of neck anatomy that can provide accurate predic-
tions of tissue damage from these fragments, which will
enable objective comparisons between the potential miti-gative effects of different body armour systems to bemade.
Method: A high definition numerical model has been
developed based on an anatomically accurate, anthropo-
metrically representative, three-dimensional mathemati-
cal mesh of cervical neurovascular structures. An
explicit Eulerian approach has been chosen, in conjunc-
tion with an LS-DYNA finite element code, to simulate
the effect of a metal fragment simulating projectile(FSP) passing through cervical neurovascular structures.
Currently all structures are modelled using material prop-
erties based on 20% ballistic gelatin, a tissue simulant that
has been demonstrated to accurately simulate the retarda-
tion of such projectiles in tissue [2]. The predicted depth
of penetration (DoP) into muscle of 20 test shots of a sim-
ulated 1.10g FSP in the simulation were compared to that
AAOMS � 2013