f light. test d attaatimer evaluation the gm time and time in mode (dj13, dm13) were compared with...

185
J GT-2 J .1 ';'t'('J:/ , If ;1, £:;p.J j /F_LIGHT. TEST_DATTAA BOOK XII TIMING, PRESSURE - A350 DIR IQ6 AD - FP AD o GI AO - G2 AD - G$ T A$ST " 8SS R ASST 112 BUDGET 104 RRD 122 I[DIT 149 REG 122 _._.._ ACD 137 ._o _l_=- 21_ .,-_'_J _IDLO 242 -_ / IRD 1235 "j"_ SMO 310 _" " SRD 188 NASA HQ. --- AND ALTITUDE COMPARISONS N67 15134 ' """7"sW o _r_ASA CR O-R TMX OR AD NUMBER) GPO PRICE $ RU) (CAT[GORY| Prepared byi _ Computation and Analysis il ,4" am Division CFSTI PRICE(S) $ ETS 112 EHGR 107 AD - ADM It1 CH. C 145 PA 15 r_ SEC Slg FtSC 13G A$O 1!! PHOTO 190 pERS 3O9 PROC 1:38 Hard copy (HC). Microfiche (M F) _ ff653 July 65 NATIONAL AcK,_,_,.,UTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER HOUSTON, TEXAS 19 JANUARy 1965 # IIASA-LANGLEY MAR 2 1965 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19670003805 2020-03-25T04:13:12+00:00Z

Upload: others

Post on 19-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

J

GT-2

J .1 ';'t'('J:/ , If

;1, £:;p.J j

/F_LIGHT. TEST_D ATTAA

BOOK XII

TIMING, PRESSURE- A350 DIR IQ6

AD - FPAD o GIAO - G2AD - G$T A$ST "8SSR ASST 112

BUDGET 104RRD 122

I[DIT 149REG 122

_._.._ ACD 137• ._o _l_=- 21_

• .,-_'_J _IDLO 242

-_ / IRD 1235"j"_ SMO 310

_" " SRD 188NASA HQ. ---

AND ALTITUDE COMPARISONSN67 15134

' """7"sWo

_r_ASA CR O-R TMX OR AD NUMBER)

GPO PRICE $

RU)

(CAT[GORY|

Prepared byi _

Computation and Analysisil

,4"am

Division

CFSTI PRICE(S) $

ETS 112EHGR 107AD - ADM I t 1

CH. C 145PA 15 r_SEC Slg

FtSC 13GA$O 1!!PHOTO 190pERS 3O9PROC 1:38

Hard copy (HC).

Microfiche (M F) _

ff653 July 65

NATIONAL AcK,_,_,.,UTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

•MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER

HOUSTON, TEXAS

19 JANUARy 1965

#IIASA-LANGLEYMAR2 1965

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19670003805 2020-03-25T04:13:12+00:00Z

Page 2: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

V

II

TIMING, PRESSURE, AND ALTITUDE COMPARISJONS

Page 3: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

TABLEOFCONTENTS

SEC TION I

Sensor Locations

SEC TION II

Computation Procedures

SEC TION III

Plots And Tabulations Of Pressure And Altitude Differences

Seq. No. Definition Plot. No.

CB07

QB04

QB09

QBIO

QC14

QD06KB02

Delta Forward Compartment Pressure I

Delta Conic Section R/H Equip. Compt. 2Absolute Pressure

Delta Landing Gear Compt. Abs. Press. 3Delta L/H Equip. Compt. Abs. Press. 4

Delta Retro-Compt. Abs. Pressure 5

Delta Adapter Equip. Compt. Abs. Press. 6

Delta Radar Cover Cavity Abs. Press. 7Delta Pressure - Altitude 8

Tab. No.

II

I

I

1

2

DJ13

DM13

SECTION IV

Plots And Tabulations Of Time Differences

Delta Greenwich Mean Time

Delta Time In Ascent Mode

Delta Time In Reentry Mode

2

2

3

Page 4: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

S_CTIONI

SENSORLOCATIONS

Page 5: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

NASA-S-64-7216

OAMS

relay panel--\

OAME

package.----

--Discrete command\ relay panel No, 1\\\

/ -QCI5

-- Discrete command

relay panel No. 2

-------DCS unit

-- LAO 5

ACQ aidbeacon

LDO1 -/

Instrumentationpackage No. 1-- /

// I

Lo-level multiplexer -/ / I LB04

Hi-level multiplexer -/

//

--Diplexer _iii_.

E:

i-- S band !i_.beacon :_

-- ECS 02 _!i

bottle .ii:

/ --CA02 .:i;/ .!!:

.:_iii::; Sequence numbers.::_ ...._::i::;: of parameters

::::::::::::::::::::::::::located on this drawing

%-- CAO1

CA01 LD01CA02 QC15LA05LB04

Adapter section-electronic module and ECS primary oxygen

Page 6: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

NASA-S-64-7224

CB07--\

/ -- CC04

CC01

/ --CC03

CA03

KBO2--

CB01 -/

/CB02 -I

/

CC05-- //

CC02 -/

Reentry vehicle - ECS module

/

Sequence numbersof parameterslocated on this drawing

CA03 CC04CA04 CC05CB01 KB02CB02CB07CC01

CC02

CC03

Page 7: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

NASA-S-64-7212

TY

LX 8

_',,! _2_-.JL.#Yooo_ .8 \oo,o

Z 2 2 3.5 RX ii_!ii ':i:iiiii:i _ Z 104.50

LegendCl Outside surface0 Opposite side surface• Inside spacecraft

Sequencenumbersof parameterslocated on this drawing

AB07 QA11 QD07AB08 QA12 QD08MA28 QA13 QD09MA29 QA14 QDIOQA09 QD06 QD11QA10

Reentry vehicle - vibration_ separation_ pressure_ and temperature sensors

Page 8: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

NASA-S-64-7218

Sequencenumbersof parameterslocatedon this drawing

HH07QCI4

QC14

HH07

N-- Adapterseparation- retrosequencerelay panelassy

Adapterretrosection-retrorocketsandmountingstructure

Page 9: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

NASA-S-64-7211

--BD011 BD02, BE011BE02_ BH011BH02

I\\

\

/-Low-level/ multiplexer

,--Instrumentation / /-High-level/ package no. 2, / / multiplexer

/ /-Referencer-BFO./// / / junction box/

/ / /, / / P Suit compressor/ / /

/ power supply

/ /- Fan power/ / supply

/ _-DC-to-DC // / /

converters /

//

// /

/

/- Low frequencyTM transmitter

FHigh frequency/ TM transmitter

/-- UHF voice// transceiver

Reentry vehicle - right hand equipment bay

Suit compressor\\ \\\ \\.___ power supply

\ Coaxial switch\ \

\ _C band\ beacon

x_ Programmer

Sequence numbersof parameterslocated on this drawing

BDOZ BH01BD02 BH02BE01 LEO5BE02 LC04BFO 1 QB04BF05

Page 10: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

SNCTION II

COMPUTATION PROCEDURES

Page 11: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

PRESSUREANDALTITUDECOMPARISONS

Differences between the free stream ambient pressure and the telemeteredpressures were computedby subtracting the free stream ambient pressurefrom the telemetered pressures. The telemetered pressures were smoothedby using a three-point moving average prior to differencing. The freestream ambient pressure profile was constructed by using measuredmeteor-ological, radar, and IGS data. Free stream ambient pressure was inter-polated, where needed, by using Aiken's four-poing interpolation tech-nique. Thesedifferences were computedbelow 150Kfeet for ascent andreentry.

Altitude differences were computedby subtracting the measuredaltitudefrom the pressure-altitude below 65K feet for ascent and reentry. Theprocedure for computing differences for KB02is as follows:

a. SmoothKB02by using a three-point moving average.

b. Convert KB02pressure reading to altitude by using the ARDC1962 model atmosphere.

c. Convert the radar measuredaltitude to pressure by using themeasuredmeteorological data.

d. Convert the pressure from (c) to altitude by using the ARDC1962 model atmosphere.

e. Computealtitude differences (a) - (c) for ascent and reentryphase below 65K feet.

Page 12: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

TIMER EVALUATION

The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with

the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed

as follows, every 2.A seconds:

Delta GMT = GMT -(AA02)

Delta time in ascent mode = DJ13 - AAO2

Delta time in reentry mode = DM13 -AA02

where:

AA02 = coarse time

GMT = AFETR D-5 time (time from lift-off)

DJ13 = time in ascent mode

DM13 = time in reentry mode

Page 13: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

SNSTIONIII

PLOTSANDTABULATIONSOFPRESSUREANDALTITUDEDIFFERENCES

Page 14: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

D

qlm

I

J

6m_

Page 15: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

?

LO_q

Page 16: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

|

|

m

Lm_q

Page 17: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

\

LIiNq

?

Page 18: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

¥

Ik m_41

Page 19: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

lt.ONq

?

§

N

ill

I

Page 20: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

?

|

llJ

GWmuo

NI

i

a,o_q

Page 21: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

?

Page 22: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0 T

11m

LImq

Page 23: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

§

irj

NlwQ

al

al, i t-, qr

Page 24: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

§

|

LO_

Page 25: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0 ?

IW14

l

W

Le_

Page 26: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

! ? 0

LONq

Page 27: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

iw

u

I

li, ll*-. q

Page 28: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

1

II

lilllllllliliiilliililliiijlilillillliiIZilliilllllliiilfilllillII111111111111111111

B

111 IIIIIIIII1 I11111111111111111

t I- lJ Jll,,,, iIII IIII,,,, , lllillllllllII IIII,, ,,,, IIIIIIIIIIII._i, I III _. IIIII",,

_. I1 JII II,,III '''l I IIIII,,'"' IIIIIIIIIIII_,_, Illllllj_ , ,r,, llIJJ"Ill, ,i ililllllllll,.,.,.' _ I1.11111tll t I1"- J,,_ IIIII,_IIIIIIIIIIII_::,:. L. Ii,lll'''_'' ,,

_' I"III'"1 I,,,,, ,, lllllIlll II g,-,, llfllJ'llIflIIl1111,,

I1IiiIII I''_ IIIIII1111111111,11

I111",,, IIIIlllllllllllllllI i11!111111 -',,_ IIII111111111111111

_! II1111111 ]kJ IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111 1IIIIIIIII I_ IIIIIIIIII111111111 II11111111 ___ff 11111111111!111!!!! iIililltll ._1 Illllllllllllllllll

_J IIIIIIIII "£ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii :Illllllll _ IIIIIIllllllillllll

1 I II1111111 _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIitll _I Iil111111111111111

1 1 IIIIIIIII _ II1111111111111111 11 IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII111111111 "'

IIII11111 _ IIIIIIIII1111111111 l

IIIIIIIII ,! IIIIIIII11111.111111 p-I IIIIIIIII | IIIIIIIIIIIIlllrlll IIIII11111 J IIII!I1111111111III IIIIIIIIII ! IIIIIIIIII11111111!1111111i IIIIIII11111111111

. . . Ifilllill _ iliiliillillllliliIlilfilil iililillilillifiilIlll. lllll lilllllilllllillit i .,.

" q ,_ m ,,, o _ _ ? T I'

Q

IIIIII111111111111III111111111111111II1111111IIIIIIIII 1 tIIII11111111111111 ,

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ]IIIIIllllllllJllllt _ IIIII11111111111111IJlllllllll]llllll 1Illlllllllllllllll

Lm_

Page 29: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

|

i ?

LO_

Page 30: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

IR

i

i..um

I!

iI

I!

!

I

I

iI

fJ

II

i

i

I

iI!

iI

iI

II

II

i

I

, L

JiI

Ii]

!

Ii

I

I

I

IIk

lU

I:II

li

i :

i

9nt

!

!

, i

o

i

i

I

[

!

!

J

I

I

L

I

I[

,p |

1

i

I I

i :

I

i 'L

IIJIj oq14

InlU

ii

, I

:1

i'

! I

I

LIq.!

l

IRD

t

IR

tip

Id

6 IO D,e_

Page 31: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

?

Ib

N

II. WN_

Page 32: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0 ?

|

|

i

itlW

II

II, II IN 9I

Page 33: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

?

|

lID

IW

l

LIR_q

Page 34: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

td

bJb.

0 ? ?

LgtNq

Page 35: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

iJ

|!

Page 36: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

!r

. l Iill'_: I

't-!

|

i!

'!),

! 1 i

I

I

tI

I-t...................

i-°_-.....................

t i..............

I Ii

m

Q

J

i

....o

i iQ

._ L_-. I.o,

I

i I

_.._ _....... i_. i .... ' _ ......... ° .......

i _-.d ................. - .... i_o ' ..... I ,o

i i !

h,Wb_

Page 37: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_ p

' I

-i-T-T-T-'

i i 1

'F_i i

IM

w !;il

N_ " : ;L

A

! . . !

i ; ; t

.I ! ! _

-_:ii1 "

| 1

I

--_t-_ ,-T-TI ii

_.l__,! i _''__

, !_11

-

+_--i-i

t

_WW_

I I] _il

I , ' ,

i _i 111i I

--I .... _-i -_i

t I " "P

I

!

- _ ---1- -...-.......

-- -_ ...... _ --' _¢- _r- ......

i !, i

i , !

I: I

' i I I

1 .

i

, i 1..,

i I

! I

[ 1i ii: i

[

_1 ill [" I • •

_i iii

I I

I

• * i

i

iT'

-I !

I I

--F'] ........

, I

1

"°'"t'-- -F- ----

......._-__/

i

2 ....._--1 r, r

.[ _

1 i

i -r--,I J

lt!I

I! '

i n

, 1I ' I

I i

,!L I I I

|I

i

i

i

_-._

F-

Q

!.

i-

f _[ Q

i

IF

I

Page 38: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

! J

| |_WW_

Page 39: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

;_i!li.l!i i!lili:i!iil+ii_iil!ili

-fi _, _.

'+ I J t+il. I iI ,

• - |Itl:/i/l

w _

,-- ,iilli i IN _};illl I

w i i I ,I

i- , • • I

-' .R'R + ':i

"1--+-_ +-'-I

i_l ! ; : : I I: ...... I

j l _ _ j

IiI_!lili _i:_ii illil, I

i +

! !I i _'_!!!! _!!'

ji!l

+Ill

,i I I l • i "

+ +.....+ I + I,t} t

iii_ iil

if:: : ; : JI

: ; _" : [ i i, , , , ,

!iJ.... IIl• : t ;

'II.... ilj

it'I1

t : t -

I I 'i i l , _ ,,

II

i!

i 'I+, ili+ii+,,, _-i-i. i i .'- ! i

! t I I

1 !!t !

I ! I I '1 I ; ,

I!!I,+i

t t i q

t i

iii _!!! iiiii ::

1 I I I I

itf !_ill ii.... i i

I I I I

II

,,.iII,

Ill

llll

_ww_

Page 40: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_. ¥N .J

n_

z_,.,

W

¥Wu.b_

W U _'-

I-

O.

_'_ _'_,_'_,_W'_ _ _

i ....... _ ,,_,,_

Page 41: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

=.=

Wgt'W

e,=D

W

W

o=

II I lllil|lll!

w_e _

I1.

U.

•, @

I-

Page 42: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0_

•,t Q. _W _

-J_W N

T_W

.mJ_W

OW_ n

¥

W

Z

G.

oooo.ooooo,_ooo,,,._o_ ................. • ............ _ • • ._ ._ • •

.J

Page 43: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

41:

0

b,I ;4)

0

r.3 taJ Q. Q.

I).

ww

_tAJ

_ Lt. q,h

ObJG. n_U_a.a

t_J

tJJ t_bJ

UlU_

._.,***,_..°°°°°°°°,°,°°°°°o°.°o,o°.°**o°,

Page 44: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

=J

I1=,1¢I.=

,,1[.=j,m ,I[

I-

r3.. t_

,.=,

u_W s,.,/ I,--

eL

_===,q[ q[ s/9

II. ,1_

I_llll|liilll|l/lll/ll/llillllll

illli_llili_ill_l_iillili_Tlili_Tlili_iili

i

Page 45: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.=/

i-

.Jv_

.2"- u¢"¢_ l_J u.

_)

I- _ ,.=* Q.

l-a.

OUO.

O.

O.

O.

Page 46: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

q(

w

0

W

ot

WO

L

_L_

m_m_ W

O.J_ mL

UN

O.

$--

..............."'_999 ..... 999 .9 ............... "_VVVVVVVV?VVVV _° ° 0 , ,?V_VVV?

_ • • ._9 ..... 99__ ._ ....................., , 0 , , , ,V?V, ,,?, ,?V _ , ,VV_V

VV??VVVVVVVVVVVV0 0VVVVV?VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

Page 47: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

JN

M

Zq(

wut

o

W

W

NI

Im

OW rL Q.

_6

W'qtWO.J _

_N_N_N_NN_

_ooo°oo_o°

Page 48: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

mi-

n.i

a.

!-

o

',auEn- #,1_

G.

al,,

???????? ???_=????????????????_????????????,,

_°_°o_

???????? ???????????_???????????????????,,0 ,

???????? ??????????????????????????????????

_____._ ...................

Page 49: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

iJl.i

ID

W

CrW

IL

nl

q_J t.i

nl

ar_ __ v_

L

o**o_o.oo_**oo°oo°oo°_o,o°o.oJooo**o.ooo

° . , °_T_T_ °,° °°, , ° ,° °.°. ,, °

_o_**ooo_wooo,oooo,o_,o_olooto**o.eoooo,

Page 50: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

,,J

m

g

W

O

W

W

16

?

_.._ U Q,, Q,

a.

.,,¢w

TTTT° °TTTTTTT TTT TTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTT

• o°o0°_o_ .0_o

o=oo=o===ooo _TT?

_ _NN NNNN_

Page 51: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

m

q_ rJL _a_a

w

..a

w W4tW_L

qP

0,.

v

...o..o.°..o.o.oo.....ooo..._.....,....o,..

TTTTTT_TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT,,

.eeee.

.............. _@@ ..... _ .QQ ....... _ • ."'ii

Page 52: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

J

I

b-_L

C6

W

W

w _,

q

n_

_ W

IIIit11111111111111111111111

IlllllllllllIlllllllllltlllllIIllllllllll I

5_'°_ _ _ _ _ _ _IIIllllllllllllllllllllllltlllllllllillllil '

Page 53: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

gOS

e.-

Q.

¥

° _

L

.... • • • • ............ ._ • • • • ...... _.._ • ,_ ....

Page 54: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

N

m

0

W

UJ

0

U_

t--

_,., <

_tu

u_v

.°****°.,°°.o°,,0°,o..°°,°°.,°,.,.°,°**°0,°

. • • ° . . • . . • , • , ° • • . • o • ° ° ° • • ° • • • • ° • • ° • • • • , • • ° •

L

Page 55: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J4.1

CD.(g..

.9[ G:

Out._

bJ

0

bJ

(/)t_l

G.

I-13,

t-G.

O_G. G.

iL

G.

_____:__::: ..........

,,_.****......_..,,..,..,_o...,

o_°**o,oo°°°,°°,.°°°°_°°°tt_,t,

trttr_tdrtvt_,t tl._tt_t_t_,tt_t_')_ _tl.t _tr_ _,)tl,ttft_,_• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o • ° . • • • • •

_ _ _NO_N_N_N__N_

Page 56: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

Z

_JLlr

L_

L_

.,J_t

(M!

N

" °

IIIIIIIIl|llltllllllll|lllllllllll|lllll|l|_W

Page 57: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

m9_

9_q_o

N

W

I_LJ

OD

_J

Im_J,JLQ_q_q_l

hJ

Page 58: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

,.JN

l.i

w

t,_

w

t-,-

I

t,-,, _%1

,.,JWq_'o £1.

I 0 0_W

Page 59: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.JN

t_J

tA.b.

i.-

t_Ji

q:,._

O

v)

Page 60: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

CO,11I-

Z.1{

rj_

W

u(,JLI.

W

f,a!

I-- N

Illlllllllllllllllllllllillllll

_W

Page 61: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

,-t

N

W

t_J

IA.

0

I=.

.J

o,I

,L

,_CO

I=.

WLI.

Page 62: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

If.

I=-¢_

,.c ,,r_

°J

°J_°,o°,°oeo°e°°°_°_°_°,°°°°_°°_,°°°,o°°°_

II II IIII I I IIII IIIIIIIII I III I

Page 63: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

2[

,.,eI,a.

.,.I

O,.,, ('_,_,.,J_

_25

0

IIIIIlililiilillll/O/lllllllll__OllllIIIIII

..... _..._ ..... _ ..... _ .... _._...

Page 64: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

2

_=_

W

..I

b

I--

IIIIIIIIII1|111111111111111111|11111111

_ __ ...................................

Page 65: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Jo4

O)

Z91[

w

o

N

,_J

i

,_rel°.°**°,°°****°*°°°*******°,*°*°°.°...°°.°.*

Page 66: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

w

[,...

i

",¢¢0v

.4C

_;; .......................................

Page 67: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

(3Z

cO

z •

i.i

LL

L_J

I--

t--.J9{

k-G4

_°*°_.o°_°1o.,1°°°°°°.o_°o°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°

IIIl||i|lltlilllllll titlilll It li_iill

Page 68: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

,.4

t_

t_J

.J

,.o

°_

I."tdJ

...o I,O

oo,ooooo,,oooo.,,,,°,,_,o,,_o°,,,_,ooo°o.o°

Page 69: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

w

u.

ID

,..I9¢

!

I-oJ

Oh.b.I

C3

• °, • °,°ooo_°

NN___NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN_NNN_NNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllllflllllllllllllltllllll

Page 70: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

l.n

.,,It

_d

L_.&z.

W

...J_'9

..J

OIL

W

°o_°.,t°°_°°°°°°°o°°°°.o°°.°.°°.°°°° .... °°

, , ° , , ,? ?????, ,???????TTTTTT

_W

Page 71: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

..J

w

k=.

_ _N_ _ _ _N _ _ _ __ _

liililllillillllllll|llllllllllllllil;lllll

Page 72: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_11"4

Z

Z

,$

W

hi0

0_

A

Page 73: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

c_

s-,-

0,-

?

._1C5

.,COO

II|lllli|illllllllll|llllltlilllllllllllill

Page 74: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

2

W

I.-

I

o_I,-hi

I. ???®®??????®_????????????_®®®_??_?????_,,, , , , , , , , , ,_

Page 75: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

¢..

(_J

s-t_j

IJ.

I,- Wcn

lllllllil|||lli|lli|ll|_l

Page 76: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

rn

Zq_

q_J

L_

_JL_

CD

t_JC_

im

D--..Jq_

t.- C_J..t,_qCIDO

,It

_J

D- W

°,oo°o,°o°o°°o°o°o°o,°°_oo.°,°o°,o°°°°°°°°°

,oo°o,,,°o_,eoe_°_o°,°*o,_o_o°°,°°°_o°oo°o

Page 77: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

w

I.-

!

..J

Page 78: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

ti*

zqc

o_

I-*_J.j_mj9jill

.9[II-W

.,°°°°**°°°**°_°°°...,**°°°°°°°°**°°.°°°°°°

Page 79: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

CQ

Zqc

o*i

CJ

LI.

L_J

_IC n'i°*°°***o*°o°°°°*°o°*o°°,°.o°o°°°°°°° ...... •

Page 80: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

w

L_

W

J

Page 81: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

w

.J

o

• _o0,,00,°000000°°o°0°°_00°.° .... ,000° .....

Page 82: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.Jt_

4c

t_,,J

!

1- ¢_J

9¢m_s

-I

..o._ooooooo*,oo.ooo

Page 83: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

Z

CD

_Fq_

W

_J

OD

t_

q_C_O_s

J _Jw

Page 84: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

CO

Z4c_N

_Nqcn_l_s

0

Page 85: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

z

I-

z.ic

IN

IL

hi

--Iqf

!

I-- I_1

,ecrnIIC

ql

D_I-

,.w

Page 86: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

--3qc

tit

o

w

..I9_

c_J

Ot_

..o°oooo°oooooooooooooo°ooooooooooo_ooo°ooo

Page 87: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

o.-

w

LmJ

!

.mr '..._qt_

W#._

• o°,,°..o°.o,..°ooo.o,°o.o.°°,.°,..°,°o .

Page 88: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

o's

w

Ls.

L_d

v _°o_°_o_oo_ooo°oo°_o°ooo°°o°°oooo°°°oo_°o_o

Page 89: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

cO

Z

o_q.d

IJJu_

_J

..J

I

_a_

w_

• o ° ° . o o o o , ° o ° . ° . ° o o o , o . ° . ° o . ° o , o o . , • • o ° 0 , o °

Page 90: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

_F

Z

LsJc_

t_

tD

!

91_m• °_ °°°°°,.o°oo,°°o°°o°°o°°°°''°°°°°°

Page 91: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_d

c_z

I-

_p_

..J f.._qqt_m

.Jw@¢rlL_.

I-,.Jw

****°°..°°_****°°****°**°°***°o**°°.,°,°,°,

Page 92: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

w

W

ion

Wt_'OmJ.

Page 93: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

_o

--3q_

_h

w_

£i.

C_

!

_j N,iCrn

oooooooooooooo_o°o°oooooooooooooo_ooooooooo

Page 94: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

zq_IIj

w_OLL_J

ooo_ooooo_oo_ooooooooo_ooooooo_oooooooooo

o_o_o_o_o_o_oo_oooo_o_o_o_o_oo

Page 95: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

qlC"--t

L_

L_J

L,J

Im

_ MP

I--1%/_JL'_

°_O°°oo°,o,o°_°°_oo°°°°° o • °° °

Page 96: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

L_

ZqC-i D

W

iJc_

Law

0

IJJ

Jo.IC

tJ

qC

iL

oooo,,°°_o°°o°o,°°_o_o_o°o°ooo°°°o,o°°°°o°_

Page 97: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.Jc_J

z

L_

LL.

l--

_J

_ C_J

°°o°°°o.°o°°°oo°o°o°°o°°°°°o°o_°oooo° ..... •

Page 98: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

W

•at ,',_

wc_'OLL-

o°*°°°°°°°.°°oo°°°o°°o°oooooo°oo.°e°°°ooo°o

Page 99: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

qc

,N

b."

o

im

im

c%Jt

_B

qcq_

,IC

_JwnL

I,- WIfJ

°_°_°_°_°o°_o°_°°.°_°_°_°_'o°_°°°°°°°.°°

Page 100: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

wt_bJb6

w

g

_ ..........

Page 101: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

t,-N

,,Lq¢

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN_*_*_NNNNNN

Page 102: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

,.,Jt_d

q_I--

-3,9c

,,,4

z_

tl

,It¢0

/

Page 103: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.JN

ql

w

w

I

..J,_

Ic

iI

Page 104: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

¢0

=_,

w

I.=.

o,I!

w_e._ u.

°o°o_oooo_°o°°o°oooo°,o°oo_°°°o_°oo°o°°o°o°

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN_._*NNNNNNN_NNNN_NN_

Page 105: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

qc

w

OB

_P

_l c_J_rn

t_

ooooo°oo_°oo°ooo°oo°ooooo_o°oo°oooo°oooooo

Page 106: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z_

_W4

¥w

q.Iqr

N

_JqcC_

l,s

_JLJ.

Page 107: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

m

..m

w

_J

i-

Illlllllllilllllililiillllllllllllllll

Page 108: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

¢4

L_JLJrJU_

I--

O4

I-"N,,,,,J'_'_,Cm

t-'tAJ

ilia

Page 109: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_1oJ

<=

i.i

w

tm

..Iq¢

IIB_P

9EI_

3_,,Jla.

oo°oo.o.o°°o°o+,°o°°.o+.oo..oo°°.°°+ooo.°oo

Page 110: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

r_

w

£_

w

J

L

0

IIii

®®®®®®____,_ "_ ............

Page 111: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

cO

t_J

t,-

t_Ju.

Page 112: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

Z

zqc

LA*

_A

I'=N

IIIllIllllIlllllllll Illl

Page 113: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

q_

_w

w

w

l,-

b-

P-c_J,.I_)_accD

4E

wLJ.

°°o°°oI°°°_o_°°o°_o°°°°°°°°°°.°°°°°°°°°°°e°

Page 114: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_t9(

u-

0

W

J

WtX

T_Lm.

Page 115: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

g_

w.4

_J

_J

L_

bJ

q__J|

o-_,J

,COOt,l

qc

_Jb,;

Page 116: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

rrJ

ZqC--jJ_IN

L_

wf_

w

.ic t#_

ow_

Page 117: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

z

a_po

_J

W

L_aL

LiJ

l,-

ml

ib _J

IIL_J..J f.._11_ rtl

L_o_JoL

Page 118: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

w

._oo_o°o.o..o,o.oooooo,oo_o_ooo..ooooo,ooo,

Page 119: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

CO

Z--to_

W

bJLV

t_

t,J

.J

k-t_

Im

_°_°o°ol°°_oo°t_o°ooo°°_oooooo°_°°°°°l°o°°B

Page 120: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

CO

zmb

N

rJ_W

hJIL

W

IJq_

?

OP _'_J

9rIDD

qc

Page 121: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z14[

U_

_wILtL

IAJ

t%p!

.,J C'J,,GO

_J

Page 122: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

..JN

_m

IIQ

qW

¥W

iL

a_J

qC

sIN

_a9

WLl.

Page 123: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

W

o

=/

i-(M..JL'_

IIII IIIIIIIIIIIlllllllllllllllilltlll

Page 124: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

Z

w

I.=

I

W llllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllilllllll

Page 125: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

w

W

,.,J

.Jt._-=¢¢0

IIIIIIIIII IIIIiii

Page 126: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

,,,,,0

w

t,l¢'

o

a,a

$,,,

I-,, N,,,,/ _

W I_L" IIIIIIIIII II I1|11

Page 127: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

L_

_J

u.L_

t_l (%1

°°°°°°°°_°°o_oo°,°_°°°o°ooo_o°°°°°o°°°_°_°

Illlllll II Ilillll

Page 128: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.qE

W(_(J

L_.

I,-

N

I-'N.J_,

°°.,,...°°.._._,_.o..,_.°,o°.oooo°_°°°°,,o

TTT''T ' "T , , ,TT.NN_N _N_NII I il I{lil li(l|lil .--

Page 129: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J

b.JL_

L_

c_

i-- ¢_1

°o°°o.oB°o°°oo_oo°o.°ooo.,o.°o°o°°oo°o°°°oo

Page 130: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Sz

LL

W_O_

W

! I ! I l I I I I I ! ! I I I I I I I I I ! I I ! I l I I I I | I I l I I I I I I I I

__A_d ................................

Page 131: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z

)..

llllilillliililiilllii6illillll(lllli|illi|

Page 132: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

CO

q{

O_

LIJ

L_

I--

(M

I'(%/

_CD

9[),.I.IWb.

Illllllllllilll|lillll|lll|llll|lllllllllll

Page 133: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z9t

o.e

,=..

W

_m

I,.-

°o°, oo,°o °o.o.o • ° o°

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl|llll|lllllllllllllllll

Page 134: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

m

-j

w

0

W

t_

.J

N

w

j,,._

I-WW It I Ill II tO II

Page 135: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.=JN

¢0

-3

qe_

t_J

ko.

k.-

ml

,L,Jl,

,_cO

iD

lOlllillllllllllll|lllllllllllllll|llllllll

Page 136: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

ca

z9E

I.I

i.i

t_

i.i

I-

t,,

wu.

IIIIIIIIIIlllllllllllllllll|lllllllllllllll

°°°°°_°°°°__°°°°°°o_o.°°o_°°_°.oo°

Page 137: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.J(%1

CO..cI-

Zq[

w

LIJ

@4

_j _J

IIIiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllll

Page 138: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

¢0t=,

w

LJ.

t_

ode

_tn

Page 139: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

CD

Z.qt

W

W

La.

Q

W

N

WW

................. ._............. _@@@@@@@@@@

Page 140: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

dCD

q[

W

i.I

w

N

,C

IIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Page 141: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

z.i[

w

i.J

,L

Im-WWLm.

Page 142: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

I,-

q[

t,J

WL1¢

LI.

W

I--

/

C_J

I-* GJ

lilllllllllillllllllllllltllllllllillltllll

Page 143: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

..J

,.n

9c

_h

L_

i,D

.J9t

?

t..- t_l

.9_ ,.n

W

Page 144: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_J

Z..1[

w

W

t-

q[

I-_J

9[ *,_l

nW[I--WW

Page 145: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

2

w-e

i.i

I.-

!

..JL-_

°°.o.°..°°,o°.°°o.°°°,.....°o°.°,°.,°°.°.°°

IIIIIIlllllllllllll|lllllllllllllllllllllll

• °..°,°_°°...,°°.°.o • °o°e°o.,,_o°° °° °

Page 146: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

..J

ml

Z

Ld

bJ

t-

..J

N

!--04../_t

lillltlllilltllllll_l_lOItlt|DIIlilQiliQii|

Page 147: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

_E

...j0_

L_

W

lip_P

I--t_.jq_

,L

°°oo,,o°.,o_,,oo°°,°°ooooooo°ooo°o°o°°o°

Page 148: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

o-e

w

I-

..J

_m

IIIllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Page 149: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

J

qt

hi

W

I--

..JL_

W IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl|lllllll

Page 150: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

/

n.t

Z9[

_h

iJ

No

w

(M

.t_

I--IMJL_

IIIIIItilllllllllllllllllilllllllilllllllll

Page 151: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

J(41

Z

(J.LI.

W

I--

I

WWkin.

ill*lll_lililmilmlllllml|llil|lllllllllmlll

Page 152: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

qC

Z

W

l.J

i,¢.

I.-

!• I=-

q_

W

__ _-_ _ _ '£_2____ __

I IIIIIIIIII I I IIII|IIIII IIII IIIIIII S

Page 153: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

I,-

Z

bJ

t;

IJ

.J

N!

I,- _a

II/11111111111111111111111111111111111111

Page 154: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

I-

,i¢-tN

hi

ILl

I,d

I"III--

!

I" t_l

o...o.°" • • .o°°. .°

illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Page 155: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.(

snw

_J

wm.

W

Om

.,,I C)

Illlllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllll$1111

Page 156: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

.+1N

Ww

W

¢I!

I,,,0,;

W

L_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIit11111111111111

Page 157: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

¢D.(I,-

.=9[

O_

t"

.,J

hiI

I--GJ.,J¢_

t--ILlWII.

ii|ilillllllllllllllllll|l

i

i i

/j

, /

Page 158: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

SK3 TION IV

PLOTS AND TABULATIONS OF TIME DIFFERENCES

Page 159: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

?

mbluOzao

Page 160: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

M

i,e ¢; ?T In

mwuO_rom

Page 161: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

|

mwuO_am

Page 162: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

ow_o_om

Page 163: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

mwuOzoo

Page 164: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

0

OblvOzoe

Page 165: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every
Page 166: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

mwuO_oe

Page 167: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

|

mwuOzr*m

Page 168: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

m

m

.J

w

¥w

o

_J

w

o_

_A_W

W

°°°°°°°°°°°°°.°_°°°°°°°°°°_°°°.°_°°°o_o°°°_

I I I I

Page 169: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

N

C_

..J

q_

l_J

L_LI.

0

LL.

.°oo_oo°o°,°oo_ooooo,,.ooo._o_ooo_ooo

L_X

Li.J '_ bJ

-JIAJ

_oo_ooooo_o_o_o_oo_oo_oo_o_o_

Page 170: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

Z

a_

.J

L_

IJ. q/_

Li_ ..J

°°°o'°°o ..... ooooooooooooooooooooo,oooo*o,oo

_"_"_"_'_"_'_"_"_NNNN_NNNNNNNN0,1NNNNNC_NNNN-NNNNNNNNNI_INNN

¢D I_..I ,=¢ I_

.JW

Page 171: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

N

d

J

LJ

v_

Ci

_o_

_J

oooooo°ooooooooooo°ooooooo°°o°ooooooo_ooo°oo

w

c_N

_w

w

oo_°°oooooo°°o_o°oooo°ooo°oooo_o_oo_o_oo_

Page 172: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

lJ.

_0 f-,

_J

..IW

• • • . o . • • . • . • • • o • • • • • , • • ° • . • . o • . • • • • • o . . o • • • .

Page 173: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

e_

.J

L_

_J

o

_w_w

I

...........ee.e

.°..°°°°.°°°°._

Page 174: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

J

U2_

v

°C.

.o0...0°°..o...o°.0.°.°.°°°°0°°o°°°oo0.°0..°

w

,o.,.oo._o°,_,o°°.°°°o.°oo_o_o°°°oo_ooo,°oeo

Page 175: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

m

,...i

L_

o.

o,J

W

iJ; .,_ i-- w

g,_

W

Page 176: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

e,-

.J

tlJ w v

t-.

i i /lllol

Page 177: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

m

$

w

L_J

ill

v

iD

.......... _° o o_o ° o_o_ ............... __

0_

W

Page 178: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

N

q¢I,-

t--

W

WLJ

I.--

°_o°°°°°°°°o°°.°l°°o°°° =°oe°oe°°.°oeoeoete

• • • • °° •

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN@NNNNNNN_|@__

..=

,=1W

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN__R

Page 179: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

J

w

w

z _

w_x

$-

..°°.°.°°°°o.o°°°.°$.o°_.o$_°.°.**°_°._$°_

o°..°°°.°_°°°°°o°o°°$o.°°°_°._._..o°°°o._.__

Page 180: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

N

CG

$

.J

t_

o,oom. I

0_

_W_W °°o,..°

Page 181: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

e_

q(I,-

.J

gL_

Zt.J

tJ.

0

t_

8Z_

0 q._

I--

???_?_?V_?_, ,

°°°o°ooooo°°_e°.

..o.o.o..o.o...o..oe.o.

W

..JI,,J

eeeoeeeeeeeeee eeeoe,#,oo,ooe0eee e,eooo

Page 182: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

w

I-

-1w

If IIIi Iiii Ii|i |ill l||ll IIII

Page 183: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

w

L_

Q

r_

)--

°°°°.o°°°o°.°°o°°°°°°°°°o°°°o°,°°,°°o°o°°°o.

w

v_w

w

Page 184: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

m

.-J

_J

e.

LA.

t--

• ° ° * ° ..... ° ° • * * • ° ° ° * ° ° ° ° • * ° * ° ° • ° * ° • • ° • • ° • • • •

°..°°°.°°°°e**°,.°,,°°°°.°°,*****°,°,..,°,,°

b.!

W

Page 185: F LIGHT. TEST D ATTAATIMER EVALUATION The GM time and time in mode (DJ13, DM13) were compared with the on-board elapsed time. The time differences were computed as follows, every

rfl

J

vwzw _

LL. _ t_t_LL _ • • •

C_I • • •

_ °°°o