extract of planning proposal relating to amendment no. 18 ... · extract of planning proposal...

9
Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks to ensure the local heritage items are correctly listed and identified. The proposed amendments do not make any changes to the heritage significance of the items. PART 2: EXPLANATION of PROVISIONS Amendment applies to Explanation of provisions Map changes Map and Schedule 5 Correct the property descriptions in the LEP for lots with heritage items due to subdivision or rectifying an incorrect property description. Removal of one item (I253 Progress Association Hall, Tuross Head) which has been demolished. Addition of Najanuka Heritage Conservation Area to the Rural LEP 1987 where it relates to Deferred Matter in ELEP 2012 as it was unintentionally omitted from ELEP Amendment No. 6. This amendment was exhibited as part of the Draft ELEP in 2011 with no submissions received. Heritage Map See Attachments A and B for details PART 3: JUSTIFICATION Section A NEED for the PLANNING PROPOSAL The planning proposal is not the result of any strategic study or report. The amendments have been identified by Council staff and are considered minor in nature. The amendments correct anomalies relating to the property description of certain heritage items, delete the listing of an item that has been demolished and complete the listing of a conservation area which covers land in both ELEP 2012 and the Rural LEP 1987. Section B RELATIONSHIP to STRATEGIC PLANNING FRAMEWORK The planning proposal is consistent with the South Coast Regional Strategy and Council’s Community Strategic Plan, One Community. Section C ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL and ECONOMIC IMPACT There are no likely environmental effects as a result of the proposed amendments. Section D STATE and COMMONWEALTH INTERESTS Given the minor nature of the proposed amendments, the views of State or Commonwealth public authorities have not been sought prior to Gateway determination.

Upload: dinhhuong

Post on 02-Jul-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18

PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks to ensure the local heritage items are correctly listed and identified. The proposed amendments do not make any changes to the heritage significance of the items.

PART 2: EXPLANATION of PROVISIONS

Amendment

applies to

Explanation of provisions Map changes

Map and

Schedule 5

Correct the property descriptions in the LEP for

lots with heritage items due to subdivision or

rectifying an incorrect property description.

Removal of one item (I253 – Progress Association

Hall, Tuross Head) which has been demolished.

Addition of Najanuka Heritage Conservation Area

to the Rural LEP 1987 where it relates to Deferred

Matter in ELEP 2012 as it was unintentionally

omitted from ELEP Amendment No. 6. This

amendment was exhibited as part of the Draft

ELEP in 2011 with no submissions received.

Heritage Map

See Attachments A and B

for details

PART 3: JUSTIFICATION

Section A – NEED for the PLANNING PROPOSAL

The planning proposal is not the result of any strategic study or report. The amendments have been identified by Council staff and are considered minor in nature. The amendments correct anomalies relating to the property description of certain heritage items, delete the listing of an item that has been demolished and complete the listing of a conservation area which covers land in both ELEP 2012 and the Rural LEP 1987.

Section B – RELATIONSHIP to STRATEGIC PLANNING FRAMEWORK

The planning proposal is consistent with the South Coast Regional Strategy and Council’s Community Strategic Plan, One Community.

Section C – ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL and ECONOMIC IMPACT

There are no likely environmental effects as a result of the proposed amendments.

Section D – STATE and COMMONWEALTH INTERESTS Given the minor nature of the proposed amendments, the views of State or Commonwealth public

authorities have not been sought prior to Gateway determination.

Page 2: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

ATTACHMENT A – Heritage Amendments to ELEP 2012

No. Item No. Schedule 5 Changes Heritage Map Changes

18.1 I35

Bodalla Arms

Hotel

Change Lot and DP to Lot 1 DP

1194082

Map only Lot 1 DP 1194082 as item

no. I35

18.2 I129

Former Cheese

Factory

Change Lot and DP to Lot 11

DP 1149894

Nil

18.3 I103

Mogo Cemetery

Change Lot and DP to Lot 7323

DP 1162462

Nil

18.4 I241

Former

Agricultural

Showground Hall

Change Lot and DP to Lot 7 DP

1176656

Map northern part of Lot 7 DP

1176656 as item no. I241

18.5 I239 and I240

Glen Luna

Residence and

Mountain Valley

Farm Cottage

Change Lot and DP to Lot 45

DP 1171177

Map only Lot 45 DP 1171177 as item

no. I239 and I240

18.6 I235

Former

Temperance Hall

Change Lot and DP to Lot 441

DP 1180207

Map only Lot 441 DP 1180207 as

item no. I235

18.7 I231

Former Tilba

Tilba Hotel,

Milton’s Hotel

Change Lot and DP to Lot 442

DP 1180207

Map only Lot 442 DP 1180207 as

item no. I231

18.8 I73

Albert Read’s

Grave

Change Lot and DP to Lot 12

DP 1190088

Map only Lot 12 DP 1190088 as I73

18.9 I43, I44 and I45

Mrs Abraham

Malabar’s Grave,

Erin-Go-Bragh

Hotel site, Rail

Tracks on Former

Jetty

Change Lot and DP to Lot 1189

DP 1188374

Nil

18.10 I124

Donkey Hill Gold

Mine

Change Lot and DP to Lot 7306

DP 1166059

Nil

Page 3: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

18.11 I120

Sundial

Change Lot and DP to Lot 2 DP

1161705

Nil

18.12 A11

Breamar Farm

Change Lot and DP to Lot 2 DP

1164518 and change name to

Braemar Farm comprising

Farm House remains,

Outbuildings and Bunya Pine.

Nil

18.13 A16

Old Ferry

Approaches and

Crossings

Change Lot and DP to Lot 7319

DP 1166668; Lot 225 DP

726737

Nil

18.14 I183

Pilots Wharf and

Boatshed

Change name of item to Pilots

Wharf and Boatshed Remains

and change Lot and DP to Lot

7313 DP 1166286

Nil

18.15 I251

Old Tuross Bakery

Change Lot and DP to Lot 1 DP

1159384

Nil

18.16 I148

Sacred Heart

Catholic Church

and St Mary’s

Convent Group

Change Lot and DP to Lots 1, 2

and 3 DP 1184190 and change

name to Catholic Church,

Presbytery, Convent and

School Group

Nil

18.17 I50

Corn Trail

Change Lot and DP to Lot 14

DP 1196039

Nil

18.18 I253

Tuross Progress

Association Hall

Remove from Schedule Remove from Map

ATTACHMENT B – Heritage Amendment to Rural LEP 1987

No. Map Change

18.19 Identification of Najanuka Heritage Conservation Area to the RLEP 1987 map on land

within the area that is deferred from ELEP 2012.

Page 4: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

LO C

RO

WN

SH

ER

RIN

GH

AM

LAN

E

HA

XSTEAD

RO

AD

LO C

RO

WN

LO

CR

OW

N

LO CROWN

LO

CR

OW

N

23719750

435752155

4583678

1583678

2583678

3583678

83499767

4800600162

4900600163

82499766

70551060178

2171600164

1125769

8852736

9852736

11153642

221046699

73001128707

4021132410

21141039

221140120

11147335

21147335

31149168

21149168

111190088

121190088

12/2/2015 Scale: 1:11060

Heritage Map (18.8)

mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Show coloured area within red outline as item I73 (Sheet HER_014B)
Page 5: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

COMERANG FARM ROAD

PR

INC

ES

HIG

HW

AY

LO

ES

C

SUTCLIFFE STREET

GANNONS POINT ROAD

EURO

BO

DALL

A RO

AD

1250007

3250007

6250007

3513566

3313566

3113566

3913566

4213566

4413566

4513566

Part Lot 4713566

53500678

86584733

A359942

9263277

720846

920846

2214034

5787496

1830129

2830129

140851742

11097533

21129079

11186515

21186515

80598258

11263277

12263277

13263277

120846

320846

520846

1176147

Part Lot 21752131

202231560

11102819

14263277

13247133

1445142

4227181

5227181

1504002

Part Lot 2412672

8787496

3787496

21830034

141851742

221084999

231084999

11194082

21194082

221193416

12/2/2015 Scale: 1:4268

Heritage Map (18.1)

mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Remove white area within red outline from Heritage Map relating to Item I35 (Sheet HER_08C)
Page 6: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Identify cross-hatched area on RLEP 1987 Map as Najanuka Aboriginal Conservation Area
Page 7: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

TRAFALGAR ROAD

NELSON PARADE

JUTLAND AVENUE

Part Lot 12015425

Part Lot 12115425

Part Lot 12315425

12415425

12515425

126650560

Part Lot 12715425

12815425

111061882

519374

1519374

2508618

1508618

16515425

222825

1516447

40601717

322825

1700176

27001763

700176

221336

121336

1822825

3516447

128921

528921

828921

928921

13815425

13715425

13615425

2510024

302575623

301575623

4508618

3508618

13915425

1546850

1125339

38544304

11050884

1028921

L362231

1624709

13515425

13415425

13315425

13215425

D18055

F18055

H18055

11201585

21201585

12/2/2015 Scale: 1:1489

Heritage Map (18.18)

mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Remove white area within red outline from Heritage Map (Sheet HER_013A)
Page 8: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

PR

INC

ES

HIG

HW

AY

MOUN

T DROMEDAR

Y TRAIL

BERM

AGU

I ROA

D

TH

E A

VE

NU

E

CO

RK

HI L

L D

RIV

E

LO

CR

OW

N

LO

CR

OW

N

Sec 1 Lot 13351

Sec 2 Lot 53351

Sec 3 Lot 43351

2614884

917823239

401752155

351752155

350752155

61752155

362752155

90752155 51

752155

1191518

1125582

2125581

112862831

21017506

3105866711

1117213

21039689

31141039

11152145

11168246

21168246

451171177

51176656

61176656

71176656

4421180207

31196461

1970168

1795856

1521590

1773295

31177519

12/2/2015 Scale: 1:7894

Heritage Map (18.4 - 18.7)

mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Show coloured area within red outline as item I231 (Sheet HER_014BA)
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Show coloured area within red outline as item I235 (Sheet HER_014BA)
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Show coloured area within red outline as item I241 (Sheet HER_014BA)
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Line
mhitchen
Text Box
Show coloured area within red outline as items I239 and I240 (Sheet HER_014BA & HER_014B)
Page 9: Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 ... · Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 18 PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks

Extract of Planning Proposal relating to Amendment No. 19

PART 1: OBJECTIVES or INTENDED OUTCOMES This item seeks to review the exempt and complying development categories to maintain currency and consistency with the State Environmental Planning Policy.

PART 2: EXPLANATION of PROVISIONS

Amendment

applies to

Explanation of provisions Map changes

Schedules 2

and 3

Amend the exempt and complying development categories

by:

Deleting all Advertisements from Schedule 2 as these are now included within the Exempt and Complying Development SEPP.

Deleting Industrial buildings and warehouses (external alterations or additions) from Schedule 3 as this is now included in the Exempt and Complying Development SEPP.

Nil

PART 3: JUSTIFICATION

Section A – NEED for the PLANNING PROPOSAL

The planning proposal is not the result of any strategic study or report. The amendments have been identified by Council staff and are considered minor in nature. The amendments will ensure ELEP 2012 is consistent with the Exempt and Complying Development SEPP.

Section B – RELATIONSHIP to STRATEGIC PLANNING FRAMEWORK

The planning proposal is consistent with the South Coast Regional Strategy and Council’s Community Strategic Plan, One Community.

Section C – ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL and ECONOMIC IMPACT

There are no likely environmental effects as a result of the proposed amendments.

Section D – STATE and COMMONWEALTH INTERESTS

Given the minor nature of the proposed amendments, the views of State or Commonwealth public

authorities have not been sought prior to Gateway determination.