expression and prognostic value of ars2 in hepatocellular carcinoma
TRANSCRIPT
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Expression and prognostic value of Ars2 in hepatocellularcarcinoma
Qian He • Yongde Huang • Lei Cai •
Shaobo Zhang • Chenghua Zhang
Received: 12 May 2013 / Accepted: 6 November 2013
� Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2013
Abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of
the most common malignant tumors in China. Arsenic
resistance protein 2 (Asr2) was reported to be important for
microRNA (miR) biogenesis, and its depletion could
reduce the levels of several miRs, including miR-21, which
is over-expressed in HCC. We hypothesized that Ars2 is
also overexpressed in HCC and may be involved in the
biological properties of HCC.
Methods Ars2 immunolabeling was evaluated in 132
HCCs. Ars2 immunolabeling, Ars2 qRT-PCR and miR-21
were evaluated in 20 HCCs and in paired normal tissues.
Ars2 shRNA was transfected into SMCC-7721 and HepG2
HCC cells. The cell proliferation and expression of Ars2
and miR-21 were subsequently evaluated.
Results Ars2 was expressed primarily in the nucleus of
HCC cells. The expression of Ars2 was statistically cor-
related with the loss of HCC differentiation and patho-
logical stage. The survival rates of patients with low Ars2
expression in HCC were statistically higher than patients
with overexpressed Ars2 in HCC. Ars2 and miR-21 were
more highly expressed in HCC specimens than normal
tissues, and they were also correlated. The knockdown of
Ars2 in HCC cells inhibited miR-21 expression and cell
proliferation.
Conclusions Ars2 is overexpressed in HCC and may have
prognostic value; it might play an important role in HCC
proliferation and miR-21 expression.
Keywords Ars2 � Prognostic value � Hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC)
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most com-
mon malignant tumors and is the third most lethal tumor in
the world [1]. HCC is the second leading cause of death in
Chinese cancer patients [2]. The treatment of HCC is pri-
marily surgical resection, after which the use of chemo-
therapy drugs is limited. Therefore, research regarding the
impact of proto-oncogenes on the proliferation and inva-
sion of HCC is highly significant in developing new
treatments [3].
Arsenic resistance protein 2 (Ars2/Asr2) was first
identified by screening cDNAs that conferred sodium
arsenite resistance in a hamster cell line; however, this
protein has remained poorly characterized [4, 5]. Several
lines of evidence support the role of Ars2 in RNAi function
during microRNA (miR) biogenesis and cell proliferation.
In addition, it was recently determined that Ars2 depletion
decreased the levels of several miRs, including miR-21,
let-7 and miR-155, and its suppression led to a profound
defect in cell proliferation [6]. MiR-21 was confirmed to be
overexpressed in HCC as an oncomiR, and most of the
targets of miR-21 are tumor suppressors [7]. Therefore, we
Q. He and Y. Huang contributed equally to this work.
Q. He � Y. Huang � L. Cai � S. Zhang � C. Zhang (&)
General Surgery Department, The 180th Hospital of People’s
Liberation Army, Quanzhou 362000, People’s Republic of China
e-mail: [email protected]
Y. Huang
Gastroenterology Department, The 180th Hospital of People’s
Liberation Army, Quanzhou 362000, People’s Republic of China
L. Cai
Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Southwest Hospital,
Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038,
People’s Republic of China
123
Int J Clin Oncol
DOI 10.1007/s10147-013-0642-6
hypothesize that Ars2 also exists in HCC and affects pro-
liferation. In the current study, we determined whether
Ars2 is overexpressed in HCC specimens and whether its
depletion affects the proliferation of HCC cells.
Methods
Patients and HCC specimens
Paraffin-embedded sections were obtained from 132
patients (95 men and 37 women; mean age 57.2 ± 12.3
years). Twenty frozen tumor tissues and their correspond-
ing normal tissues were obtained for real-time PCR and
immunohistochemistry from patients with primary HCC.
All these specimens were gathered from patients who
underwent radical hepatoma resection at the Department of
General Surgery, the 180th Hospital of PLA (Quanzhou,
China). The clinicopathological data of these patients
are shown in Table 1. In all cases, informed consent
was obtained for the use of the resected tumor speci-
mens. Preoperative examination of all patients found no
metastases.
All resected HCC specimens were histologically
examined by hematoxylin–eosin staining according to the
International Union against Cancer TNM Classification.
HCC was histologically classified into the following three
stages based on the predominant features: well, moder-
ately and poorly differentiated. The survival rate was
determined for the patients who met the following criteria:
first, they did not die preoperatively, and second, they did
not die of causes other than HCC within 5 years after the
surgery.
All specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in
paraffin wax. Then, 4-lm serial sections were examined by
immunohistochemistry. For real-time PCR, the samples
were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
280 �C until use.
Cell lines
SMCC-7721 and HepG2 HCC cells were purchased from
the ATCC [8, 9].
Ars2 immunolabeling
We used an immunohistochemical assay for the detection
of Ars2 protein levels using a polyclonal anti-Ars2 anti-
body (polyclonal, Catalog No. sc-135083, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., CA, USA). Unstained 4-lm sections
were cut from each tissue and de-paraffinized using routine
techniques. Antigen retrieval was accomplished by incu-
bating the tissue sections in citrate buffer at 120 �C (Boster
Bio-Technology Co. Ltd., Wu Han, China) for 130 s fol-
lowed by incubation in 0.5 % Triton-X for 30 min at
37 �C. The sections were then incubated with 4 lg/ml Ars2
antibody at 4 �C overnight. Incubation with the labeled
polymer (Envision Plus Detection kit, Gene Tech Co. Ltd.,
Shanghai, China) was then carried out for 150 min at room
temperature. The peroxidase reaction was visualized by
incubating with the Real EnVision Detection System
(Dako Co., Via Real, CA, USA) for approximately 5 min
under a microscope [10].
The appropriate positive and negative controls were
included [4, 10]. Immunostaining was classified as follows:
-: no immunostaining above the cutoff level, ?: low
expression (between 1 and 33 % positive cells), ??:
moderate expression (between 34 and 66 % positive cells),
???: strong expression (over 67 % positive cells). Two
independent pathologists evaluated each case for the
average expression of Ars2 in five different visual fields.
RNA extraction
The total RNA was isolated using the Tripure isolation
reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals Co., Indianapolis,
IN, USA).
Table 1 Clinicopathologic data for HCC specimens
Age (years) Gender Stage Differentiation
T1 43 F T2N0M0 M
T2 52 M T2N0M0 M
T3 61 F T2N1M0 W
T4 51 M T1N0M0 M
T5 38 M T1N0M0 M
T6 65 M T3N1M0 P
T7 47 F T1N0M0 W
T8 41 M T4N1M1 P
T9 44 F T1N0M0 M
T10 64 M T2N0M0 P
T11 52 M T3N0M0 M
T12 48 F T2N0M0 M
T13 37 F T2N0M0 M
T14 55 M T3N0M0 W
T15 68 M T1N0M0 M
T16 50 M T3N0M0 W
T17 46 M T4N1M0 P
T18 54 F T2N0M0 M
T19 41 M T1N0M0 M
T20 45 M T3N0M0 P
Age age at surgery, Gender male (M) and female (F), Stage TNM
staging, Differentiation well differentiated (W), moderately differen-
tiated (M), or poorly differentiated (P)
Int J Clin Oncol
123
qRT-PCR for Ars2 mRNA expression
SYBR� Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Dalian, China) was
used for the qRT-PCR. The amplification primers were as
follows: (1) Ars2: forward 50-GGTGACCTTCGACCGC
AGTGTT-30 and reverse 50-TGGGTGATGCCGTTGATG
TTGC-30; and (2) b-actin: forward 50-TGACGTGGACAT
CCGCAAAG-30 and reverse 50-CTGGAAGGTGGACAG
CGAGG-30. Amplification and detection were performed
using a Roche qRT-PCR system. The fluorescence
threshold value was calculated using the Q system soft-
ware. The conditions were as follows: 20 min at 50 �C
followed by 42 cycles of 15 s at 94 �C for denaturation,
30 s at 60 �C for annealing, and 30 s at 72 �C for exten-
sion. A single fluorescence measurement was obtained at
each extension step. Melting curve analyses and agarose
gel electrophoreses were performed to verify the amplified
products. The concentrations of the PCR products were
calculated using a standard curve prepared from serial
dilutions of the most positive specimen for b-actin and for
the target gene in the specimens.
Transduction with shArs2 lentivirus
The shRNA lentivirus for Ars2 interfering mRNA was
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Confluent cells (70–80 %) were transfected with shArs2 at
a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20 along with the
negative control using TurboGFP shRNA (Sigma-Aldrich).
The RNA and proteins were harvested 72 h after trans-
fection. The level of p21 was determined to be unaffected;
therefore, shArs2 does not affect the levels of unrelated
proteins (data not shown).
Western blots
Cells were lysed in RIPA sample buffer (Bi Yun-Tian,
Jiang Su, China) supplemented with protease inhibitors
(complete, EDTA-free; Roche, Nutley, NJ, USA) and
PMSF (Bi Yun-Tian). The protein concentration was
measured using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Bi Yun-Tian).
Cell lysates (50 lg) were electrophoresed on 8–10 %
polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitro-
cellulose membranes (Whatman International Ltd., Dassel,
Germany). The membranes were blocked with 5–10 %
skim milk and then incubated with the primary antibodies.
Anti-Ars2 (polyclonal, Catalog No. ab55822, Abcam Co.,
Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-b-actin (polycolonal, Catalog
No. sc-10731, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., CA, USA)
and anti-p21 (polyclonal, Catalog No. sc-756, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) were used according to the manufacturers’
instructions. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-
rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody was used (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), and the results were
analyzed using an enhanced chemiluminescence-plus
reagent (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK).
Cell proliferation assay
SMCC7721 and HepG2 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640
and DMEM-H supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum
(FBS), respectively. The cells were harvested in logarith-
mic phase, plated at a density of 100 cells per well in a
96-well plate, and cultured with 10 % FBS RPMI 1640 or
DMEM-H medium. Cell proliferation was measured using
a CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution cell proliferation
assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Following each
treatment, 20 ll dye solution was added to each well in the
96-well plate and incubated for 3 h. Subsequently, the
absorbance was recorded at 490 nm using a Bio-Rad model
550 microplate reader [11].
Real-time PCR assays and Northern blots for mature
miR-21
The expression of mature miR-21 and U6 was assessed by
real-time PCR analysis. Reverse transcription was per-
formed on RNA isolated using the TaqMan� MicroRNA
Reverse Transcription Kit, and the cDNA was amplified
using the specific primers provided in the TaqMan�
Human MicroRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster
City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruc-
tions. The target sequence in these assays for miR-21 was
50-UAGCUUAUCA GACUGAUGUU GA-30 and for U6
was 50-CTGCGCAAGG ATGACACGCA AATTCGT-
GAA GCGTTCCATA TTTTT-30. The cycle passing
threshold (Ct) was recorded and normalized to U6
expression. The values of the candidate specimens were
calculated using standard curves derived from serial dilu-
tions of the standard miR-21 and U6. For Northern blots,
the total RNA was fractionated on 15 % urea-PAGE gels,
transferred to Hybond? membranes, and cross-linked by
UV irradiation. Hybridization of 32P-end-labeled DNA
oligonucleotide probes antisense to miR-21 was performed
using ULTRAhyb-Oligo buffer (Ambion) at 37 �C over-
night. The probe sequences for miR-21 was 50-TAGGTA
GTTTCATGTTGTTGGCCTGTCTC-30 and for U6 was
50-ACGAATTTGCGTGTCATCCTT -30 [10].
Statistical analyses
Cumulative survival analysis was performed using the
Kaplan–Meier method and was analyzed using the log-rank
test. The correlation between Ars2 expression and each
clinicopathological factor was evaluated using the chi-
squared test. The paired samples t-test was performed to
Int J Clin Oncol
123
determine the difference in Ars2 mRNA and miR-21
expression between HCCs and corresponding normal tis-
sues, and linear regression analysis was performed to
determine the correlation of Ars2 mRNA and miR-21
expression in all the 40 specimens. Each statistical analysis
was performed with SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Apache Software
Foundation, USA). Differences with a P value of 0.05 or
less were considered statistically significant.
Results
Immunohistochemical results
The Ars2 antibody produced a primarily nuclear staining
pattern in all HCC cells of each sample. The results of the
immunohistochemical staining are shown in Fig. 1 and
Table 2. Ars2 staining was positive (score ?, ?? and
???) in 115 cases of HCC tissues (87.1 %) (Fig. 1). The
weakly positive (?), moderately positive (??) and
strongly positive staining (???) were 26/132 (19.7 %),
51/132 (38.6 %) and 38/132 (28.8 %), respectively. The
expression of Ars2 was statistically correlated with the loss
of differentiation (P = 0.000), tumor topography (P =
0.015), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.006) and patholog-
ical stage (P = 0.010. However, statistical analysis showed
that there was no significant correlation between the
expression of Ars2 and the age, gender and distant
metastasis of the patient.
Survival analysis
The Kaplan–Meier post-operative survival curve shows the
survival rate of patients with HCC and Ars2 expression
(Fig. 2). The post-operative mean survival time of all
patients with HCC was 37.227 ± 1.409 months. The mean
survival time of patients with strongly positive (???)
Ars2 expression was 29.218 ± 1.270 months, and of
patients with moderately positive (??), weakly positive
(?) and negative Ars2 expression were 34.214 ± 1.395,
43.147 ± 2.934 and 54.511 ± 3.898 months, respectively
(pairwise comparison all log-rank test: P \ 0.05). The
post-operative median survival time of all patients with
Ars2 expression was 35.000 ± 1.166 months. The median
survival time of patients with strongly positive (???)
Ars2 expression was 29.000 ± 1.270 months, and of
Fig. 1 Immunohistochemical detection of Ars2 in sections of HCCs (9200). The Ars2 was primarily stained in the nucleus. -: no
immunostaining, ?: 1 to 33 % positive cells, ??: 34 to 66 % positive cells, ???: over 67 % positive cells
Int J Clin Oncol
123
patients with moderately positive (??), weakly positive
(?) and negative Ars2 expression were 35.000 ± 2.574,
41.000 ± 3.399 and 53.000 ± 2.920 months, respectively.
Ars2 immunolabeling, Ars2 mRNA and miR-21 qRT-
PCR assays indicate higher levels of Ars2 and miR-21
in HCC specimens than normal tissues and a correlation
between Ars2 mRNA and miR-21
Immunohistochemistry for Ars2 was performed on 20
paired normal and cancer tissues. Overexpression of Ars2
was observed in the cancers; however, underexpression or
loss was observed in the paired normal tissues, and there
was a significant difference between the two as determined
by chi-squared tests (Pearson chi-squared = 28.923,
P \ 0.01). qRT-PCR assays to measure Ars2 mRNA andFig. 2 Kaplan–Meier post-operative survival curve for groups of
patients with Ars2 expression
Table 2 Correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and Ars2 expression
Parameters Total (n = 132) Ars2
- (n = 17) ? (n = 26) ?? (n = 51) ??? (n = 38) P value
Age (years)
B39 36 4 6 16 100.849
[40 96 13 20 35 28
Sex
Male 89 11 17 23 27
0.582Female 43 6 9 18 11
Differentiation
W 28 7 12 6 3
0.000M 73 8 9 34 22
P 31 2 5 11 13
TNM classification
T
T1 32 6 5 18 3
0.015T2 53 7 12 21 13
T3 29 4 6 8 11
T4 18 0 3 4 11
N
N0 121 17 26 48 300.006
N1 11 0 0 3 8
M
M0 126 17 26 49 340.156
M1 6 0 0 2 4
Stage
I 28 5 5 15 3
0.010II 48 8 12 20 8
III 50 4 9 14 23
IV 6 0 0 2 4
Int J Clin Oncol
123
miR-21 were performed on 20 corresponding normal and
HCC tissues. Normal tissues had uniformly lower expression
of Ars2 mRNA and miR-21, as shown in Fig. 3a. The rela-
tive normalized qRT-PCR values were 15.02 ± 3.35 and
11.07 ± 3.03, respectively. However, the HCCs displayed
more variable expression, with relative normalized values of
32.78 ± 8.40 and 24.84 ± 5.14, respectively. All tumors
displayed higher Ars2 and miR-21 than the normal speci-
mens. The fold-difference between the cancer and normal
groups was 2.18 and 2.24 for Ars2 and miR-21, respectively
(all P \ 0.01, n = 20, paired-samples t-test), as shown in
Fig. 3b. Ars2 is related to the expression of miR-21 and
accurately discriminates between HCC and paired normal
tissues. Linear regression analysis shows that the R2 of the
expression of Ars2 mRNA and miR-21 is 0.469 (P \ 0.001,
n = 40) in HCC and paired normal tissues (Fig. 3c).
Ars2 knockdown suppresses proliferation of HepG2
and SMCC7721 cell lines
HepG2 and SMCC7721 cells were infected with a lentiv-
iral shRNA targeting Ars2 or infected with an empty vector
control (shVec) and cultured for 3 days. Western blot
analysis was performed to detect the expression of Ars2
(Fig. 4a). The HepG2 and SMCC7721 cell lines were
plated at approximately 100 cells per well in 96-well plates
and cultured for 3, 6 or 9 days. Each assay was performed
in triplicate. The data represent the mean ± SD of 490 nm
absorbance (Fig. 4b). The shArs2 hairpin suppressed the
proliferation of both the HepG2 and SMCC7721 cell lines
by approximately 56.6 and 57.9 %, respectively (all
P \ 0.01, n = 3, independent samples t-test) compared
with the shVec-infected control cells.
Fig. 3 Realtime-PCR data in 20 HCC and corresponding normal tissue specimens. a, b Ars2 mRNA and miR-21 paired sample t-test, P \ 0.01.
c Scatter plot analysis of all T/NT specimens of Ars2 and miR-21 with R2 and P-values
Int J Clin Oncol
123
qRT-PCR assays and Northern blotting for miR-21
in HCC cells transduced by empty vector control
and shArs2
As reported, Ars2 acts during the RNAi function of miR
biogenesis and cell proliferation. It was recently observed
that Ars2 depletion decreases the levels of several miRs,
including miR-21, which was reported to be a novel onco-
gene similar to miR in HCC, and this may be the signaling
pathway by which Ars2 affects HCC cell proliferation.
Therefore, qRT-PCR assays and Northern blotting for miR-
21 were performed on HCC cells transfected with control and
shArs2 to determine whether changing the expression of
Ars2 affects miR-21 expression. Each experiment was per-
formed in triplicate. The results showed that Ars2 depletion
by shArs2 reduced the level of miR-21 by 50.1 and 64.1 %
(all P \ 0.01, n = 3, independent samples t-test) in SMCC-
7722 and HepG2, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4c.
Discussion
Ars2 was originally identified in a screen of cDNAs that
conferred sodium arsenite resistance to a hamster cell line.
Fig. 4 SMCC-7721 and HepG2 cells were infected with retroviral
shArs2 and empty vector control. a Western blot detection of Ars2 in
SMCC-7721 and HepG2 cells infected with retroviral shArs2 and
empty vector control for 3 days. b Plated for MTS proliferation assay
in triplicate, the data represent mean ± SD of 490 nm absorbance.
c Northern blots and qRT-PCR to detect the levels of mature miR-21
Int J Clin Oncol
123
The gene was located in the 7q21 human chromosome;
however, the protein has remained poorly characterized
[4]. Ars2 was found to play an important role in cell pro-
liferation, viral infection and neural stem cell characteris-
tics in a Drosophila model and in a variety of cell-based
experiments [4, 5, 12]. Furthermore, evidence showed that
Ars2 plays an essential role in miRNA-mediated silencing
by interacting with the microprocessor and stabilizing pri-
miRNAs [4–6]. Gruber et al. [4] recently reported that Ars2
plays a critical role in the proliferation of mammalian cells.
Mammalian cells cannot maintain proliferative expansion
in vitro if Ars2 is knocked down [13]. Consistent with a
critical role in proliferation, Ars2 is selectively expressed
in proliferating cells. Cells with knocked-down expression
of Ars2 undergo cell-cycle slowing at all stages of the cell
cycle, as evidenced by impairment of proliferation without
discernible changes in the cell-cycle profile and under
expression of several miRs, including miR-21, let-7 and
miR-155 [6]. Here, we characterized Ars2 expression in
formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded esophageal cancer
specimens using immunohistochemical staining methods.
The data indicate that overexpression of Ars2 is associated
with HCC carcinogenesis, possibly through regulating the
expression of mature miR-21. Ars2 expression was also
confirmed to be upregulated in HCC cancer tissues com-
pared to the adjacent normal tissues, as determined by
immunolabeling and real-time PCR. This is also signifi-
cantly correlated with the expression of miR-21 in human
HCC specimens.
MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules found
in plants and animals, which function in both transcriptional
and post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression [14].
MiRNAs are encoded by eukaryotic nuclear DNA and
function via base-pairing with complementary sequences
within mRNA molecules, usually resulting in gene silencing
via translational repression or target degradation. The human
genome may encode over 1000 miRNAs, which may target
approximately 60 % of mammalian genes and are abundant
in many human cell types [15–17]. miR-21 is one of the first
miRs to be described as an oncomiR. Because the majority of
the targets of miR-21 are tumor suppressors, miR-21 is
associated with a wide variety of cancers, and it is an
important over-expressed miR in HCC. miR-21 can decrease
the levels of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) and phosphatase
and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN)
[18–21]. In our study, we observed growth inhibition and
found that decreasing the Ars2 protein inhibits the expres-
sion of mature miR-21, consistent with previous reports.
They may be the reason that Ars2 is significantly correlated
with a predictor of survival in human HCC specimens.
Our work confirmed that Ars2 is overexpressed in HCC
and might contribute to the signaling pathways that have
important HCC prognostic value; depletion of it decreases
HCC cell proliferation and mature miR-21 expression.
Further studies are necessary to determine the signaling
pathways of Ars2 in HCC and the biochemical mechanisms
through which Ars2 influences HCC tumorigenesis.
Acknowledgments This work was partially supported by the
National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grants 81201948/
H1617.
Conflict of interest No author has any conflict of interest.
References
1. Fares N, Peron JM (2013) Epidemiology, natural history, and risk
factors of hepatocellular carcinoma. La Revue du praticien
63:216–217, 220–212
2. Tang ZY (2001) Hepatocellular carcinoma: cause, treatment and
metastasis. World J Gastroenterol 7:445–454
3. Deshmukh M, Hoshida Y (2013) Genomic profiling of cell lines
for personalized targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Hepatology. doi:10.1002/hep.26407
4. Gruber JJ, Zatechka DS, Sabin LR et al (2009) Ars2 links the
nuclear cap-binding complex to RNA interference and cell pro-
liferation. Cell 138:328–339
5. Sabin LR, Zhou R, Gruber JJ et al (2009) Ars2 regulates both
miRNA- and siRNA- dependent silencing and suppresses RNA
virus infection in Drosophila. Cell 138:340–351
6. Beezhold KJ, Castranova V, Chen F (2010) Microprocessor of
microRNAs: regulation and potential for therapeutic intervention.
Mol Cancer 9:134
7. Gramantieri L, Fornari F, Callegari E et al (2008) MicroRNA
involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med
12:2189–2204
8. You N, Liu W, Wang T et al (2012) Swainsonine inhibits growth
and potentiates the cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel in hepatocellular
carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Rep 28:2091–2100
9. Matuo MC, de Oliveira Takamoto RT, Kikuchi IS et al (2013)
Effect of bixin and norbixin on the expression of cytochrome
P450 in HepG2 cell line. Cell Biol Int 37:843–848
10. He Q, Cai L, Shuai L et al (2013) Ars2 is overexpressed in human
cholangiocarcinomas and its depletion increases PTEN and
PDCD4 by decreasing microRNA-21. Mol Carcinog 52:286–296
11. Soman G, Yang X, Jiang H et al (2009) MTS dye based colori-
metric CTLL-2 cell proliferation assay for product release and
stability monitoring of interleukin-15: assay qualification, stan-
dardization and statistical analysis. J Immunol Methods 348:
83–94
12. Andreu-Agullo C, Maurin T (2012) Ars2, an essential player in
neural stem cell identity. Med Sci 28:459–462
13. Wilson MD, Wang D, Wagner R et al (2008) ARS2 is a con-
served eukaryotic gene essential for early mammalian develop-
ment. Mol Cell Biol 28:1503–1514
14. Bentwich I, Avniel A, Karov Y et al (2005) Identification of
hundreds of conserved and nonconserved human microRNAs.
Nat Genet 37:766–770
15. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2005) Conserved seed pairing,
often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human
genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120:15–20
16. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB et al (2009) Most mammalian
mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res
19:92–105
Int J Clin Oncol
123
17. Lim LP, Lau NC, Weinstein EG et al (2003) The microRNAs of
Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev 17:991–1008
18. Morrisey EE (2010) The magic and mystery of miR-21. J Clin
Invest 120:3817–3819
19. Bhatti I, Lee A, James V et al (2011) Knockdown of microRNA-
21 inhibits proliferation and increases cell death by targeting
programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) in pancreatic ductal adeno-
carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 15:199–208
20. Selaru FM, Olaru AV, Kan T et al (2009) MicroRNA-21 is
overexpressed in human cholangiocarcinoma and regulates pro-
grammed cell death 4 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3.
Hepatology 49:1595–1601
21. Pezzolesi MG, Platzer P, Waite KA et al (2008) Differential
expression of PTEN-targeting microRNAs miR-19a and miR-21
in Cowden syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 82:1141–1149
Int J Clin Oncol
123