exploring the potential for electronic grading of fruit

21
1 Exploring the Potential for Electronic Grading of Fruit with Canker Lesions Dr. Tom Burks Associate Professor Agricultural and Biological Engineering Dept. University of Florida 46 th Annual Packinghouse Days Citrus Research and Extension Center University of Florida

Upload: others

Post on 20-Mar-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Exploring the Potential for

Electronic Grading of Fruit with Canker Lesions

Dr. Tom BurksAssociate Professor

Agricultural and Biological Engineering Dept.University of Florida

46th Annual Packinghouse Days

Citrus Research and Extension CenterUniversity of Florida

2

Progress Report

Projected funded by the USDA-TASC through Florida Fresh Packers, Assoc.Project team

Dr. Tim SchubertDr. Gordon BonnDr. Mark Ritenour

3

Research ObjectiveInvestigate various sensing techniques for detecting citrus canker and differentiating it from other common confounding diseases.

Develop On-line detection technologies that can be commercialized for eliminating cankerous fruit from the packing line.

4

First Year Objectives

Determine spectral characteristics of citrus canker and confounding diseases.Identify candidate sensing technologies which could be implemented for commercial packingline grading systemsDevelop relationship with Equipment manufacturer and acquire prototype one-lane system

5

Sample Collection and Preparation

Identified source of Grapefruit which exhibited canker and other typical disease conditionsCollected samples from field in Spring 2007Sorted, washed, sanitized, waxed at Indian River REC on their packingline under supervision of Dr. Ritenour, FMC, and a local packer.Transported to UF-Gainesville under advise of FDACS-DPI.

6

Citrus Samples & Skin ConditionsGrapefruits (Ruby Red), 2006/07 Harvest Season

Washed + ChlorineWashed + Chlorine

Washed + Chlorine + SOPP + Wax

Washed + Chlorine + SOPP + Wax

Washed + Chlorine + SOPP

Washed + Chlorine + SOPP

Copper Burn

Greasy Spot

Wind Scar

Cake Melanose

Specular Melanose

Insect damage

UnwashedUnwashed

Field Fruit with Other DiseasesField Fruit with CankerMarket Fruit

7

Citrus Data CollectionFour different vision-based systems:

Reflectance spectra using spectrophotometer ***

Color images using RGB color camera

Visible & near-infrared multispectral images

Hyperspectral reflectance & fluorescence images

8

Objectives of Spectral Reflectance Studies1. To acquire the spectral reflectance of citrus canker and other conditions.

2. To identify the significant wavelengths that have the maximum discriminatory potential.

3. To derive discriminant function that could classify citrus canker from other conditions.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2500

2400

2300

2200

2100

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800700

600500

400

300200

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

BaselineCanker MosaicMarket Fruit

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2500

2400

2300

2200

2100

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800700

600500

400

300200

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

BaselineCanker MosaicMarket Fruit

Machine Vision Grading System

CANKER

• RGB camera• NIR camera• Multispectral Camera• Hyperspectral Camera

Machine Vision Grading System

CANKER

• RGB camera• NIR camera• Multispectral Camera• Hyperspectral Camera

Main GOAL

9

Market fruit Fruit with canker Fruit with greasy spot

Fruit with copper burn Fruit with wind scar Fruit with cake melanose

Fruit samples

10

Sample holder

Spectrophotometer- Measures spectral reflectance from 200nm to 2500nm

CARY Spectrophotometer

2 inches

11

Market fruit peel

Baseline material

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2500

2400

2300

2200

2100

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

100090

080

070

060

050

040

030

020

0

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

Baseline

Market Fruit

Sample reflectance result from spectrophotometer

12

1. Color image acquisition of whole fruit

2. Preparation of peel sample in holder

3. Sample with spectrophotometer

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2500

2400

2300

2200

2100

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900800

700600

500400300200

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

Baseline

Canker MosaicMarket Fruit

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2500

2400

2300

2200

2100

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900800

700600

500400300200

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

Baseline

Canker MosaicMarket Fruit 4. Statistical analysis to identify wavelengths with

high discriminant potential

Flowchart for spectral reflectance acquisition an analysis

13

Different faces of canker

• different distribution of canker infection• spectrophotometer averages thearea of the sample holder• canker “mosaic” was prepared

14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2500

2400

2300

2200

2100

2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800700600

500400

300200

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

BaselineCanker Mosaic

Market Fruit

Visible

Visible/NIR

Whole spectrum

Statistical analysis of reflectance data

3 Spectral Ranges

1. Visible (400-750)

2. Visible/NIR (400-1100)

3. Whole spectrum(400-2500)

15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2502300210019001700150013001100900700500300

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

MarketCankerWindscarCake MelanoseCopper BurnGreasy Spot

Spectral reflectance of the different conditions

• Different spectral characteristics • Potential for separation

16

Interpreting Initial Results

These results are encouraging although caution must be used.

Disease sample sizes were largeSpectrophotometer results are not always implementable under different light sourcesGood results required 7 to 10 bands

Results provide a starting point for on-line system development, more detailed experiments in multi-spectral and hyper-spectral detection.

17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

25002300210019001700150013001100900700500300

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

Late Market SampleEarly Market Sample

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25002300210019001700150013001100900700500300

Wavelength(nm)

Ref

lect

ance

(%)

Late CankerSample(Average)Early CankerSample(Average)

Sampling DatesEarly : March 12, 2007Late : April 16, 2007

• No difference was observed with market fruit and other conditions

• There was a shift of the reflectance curve of the canker samples

Comparison of samples taken on different dates

18

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25002300210019001700150013001100900700500300

LateEarly

Greasy Spot

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25002300210019001700150013001100900700500300

LateEarly

Wind Scar

Cake Melanose

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25002300210019001700150013001100900700500300

LateEarly

Copper Burn

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25002300210019001700150013001100900700500300

LateEarly

19

Industry ContactWe have visited numerous Florida packinghouse’s and have sought close working relationships and advise.We have made contact with a prominent grading equipment manufacturer and have discussed the potential for collaboration.We have purchased a one-lane grading system prototype, where we will integrate our sensing/grading technology on their system to test design, detection and control concepts.

20

Year Two Objectives

Further develop On-line sensing technologies Integrate sensing technologies with one-lane grading system.Monitor canker spectral characteristics over the entire growing season on grapefruit to see if there is a seasonal difference.Explore spectral characteristics of other citrus varieties: navel, and tangerine are likely candidates.

21

Conclusions

Spectral reflectance of citrus canker and other disease conditions were acquired, and key wavelengths have been identified in the visible and the NIR bands.

A discriminant function was able to separate canker from other conditions with overall accuracies of 93% for all conditions, and 100 % for canker.

Results have shown a shift in the reflectance curves between “early” samples with canker and “late” samples with canker. Further spectral reflectance test and analysis will be conducted to study influence of time of season on canker spectral response.