exploring different routes from lms towards ple: a dialectical perspective
TRANSCRIPT
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 1
Exploring Different Routes from LMS towards PLE: a Dialectical PerspectiveVladimir Tomberg
Mart Laanpere
Hans Põldoja
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 2
LMS vs. PLE, or LMS & PLE?Topic:
A modern TEL system as a synthesis of LMS and PLE
Research Question:
How can we generalize various attempts to provide an alternative to LMS as the mainstream software platform in TEL?
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 3
PLE as Antithesis to LMSMainstream technological regime in TEL has been
clearly associated with the dominance of LMS
Innovators’ attempts to replace LMS with an alternative can be explained from the perspective of the dialectical logic, interpreting open Personal Learning Environments as a radical antithesis to the mainstream socio-technical regime (LMS)
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 4
Our Classification of PLE
1. Desktop-based PLE
The first steps in an evolution of PLE. Aimed a connection of
the personal desktop software to several LMSs
simultaneously.
Manchester Framework Project and desktop version of PLEX
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 5
Our Classification of PLE (2)
2. Social media as PLE
Connecting social software tools into a hub by means of RSS
threads help a learner to organize their learning flow
Wiki-based PLE (Google sites)
social-network-based PLE (Facebook)
social-aggregator-based PLE (e.g. Netvibes)
browser-based PLE (e.g. Flock)
3. Widget-based PLE
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 6
Our Classification of PLE (3)
3. Widget-based PLE
Service providers offer small applications that can be
embedded into a container application. A learner builds the
own PLE by combining these widgets in the appropriate
manner.
Widgets are packaged according to the W3C Widgets
specification and can be hosted in a container application
such as Drupal, WordPress, Moodle, Elgg, etc.
TENCompetence, Palette and ROLE
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 7
Pedagogical perspective: PLE as an approachFiedler and Väljataga [2011] argued that PLE
should not be understood at all as a certain type of software application, rather is should be seen as a pedagogical approach to organizing learning
Learners and groups should be able to: ◦ Set their personal learning goals, ◦ Design an appropriate learning environment◦ Take control over the learning activities
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 8
Design experimentsThree design experiments exploring alternative
approaches to PLE as a replacement for institutional LMS:
1. LePress
2. EduFeedr
3. Dippler
We have started in 2006 with LePress and finished in 2013 with Dippler
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 9
LePressTrying to find how to transfer into a blog-based PLE
formal learning workflows that are used in traditional LMS
Typical assessment workflow was implemented into WordPress using LePress plug-in
LePress allows the teachers to keep the control over the assessment without a need to leave social media based PLE
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 10
LePress: connecting publishing workflow with learning semantics
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 11
Teachers’ Gradebook
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 12
LePress widgets of Student and Teacher
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 13
Easy deployment of one-time courses "in the field"
Possibility to support teacher control over assessment workflow
Implementation of lightweight course coordination space
Easy to use and easy to learn (confirmed by study)
Does not support any connections between the students, which is highly demanded
Requirement to install plug-in in a blog
Impossibility of use with platforms like Wordpress.com, Edublogs.org. etc.
Advantages vs. disadvantages
EduFeedrCoordination and awareness tool for open online
courses with blogs
Course enrollment, aggregating blog posts and comments, managing assignments, visualizing the progress and social network
Plugin-free architecture enables learners to use free blogging services (WordPress.com, Blogger)
Example use cases: higher education courses with informal participants, small open online courses
14
EduFeedr UI and Analytics
15
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 16
No plug-ins needed; The learners can self-enroll to
the course, thus limiting the workload of the facilitator;
Enhancing the discussions by displaying most recent comments from learners’ blogs;
Simple learning analytics visualizations (progress chart, social network);
Focus on openness: almost all information (except learners’ e-mail addresses) is public for any visitor
There is no simple way for private grading of learners’ blog posts;
Learners’ blog post is connected with the assignment only if the learner included a link to the assignment in her post;
There is no way to keep private blogs that are visible only for the participants of the course
Advantages vs. disadvantages
Dippler as DLE Core services (digital specimen): BackOffice (BOS wsdl),
Wordpress as PLE, Learning Object Repository, online testing service Questr, institutional client, mobile clients
Secondary services: social media (SlideShare, YouTube), identity management (to come: concept mapping, 6 thinking hats)
User communities: learners, facilitators, administrative staff, software developers
Adaptive: institutions and users can expand and adapt the ecosystem
Self-regulation: users can change affiliation, design learning paths
Learning analytics: annotating with domain-specific categories
Software implementation
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 19
Better integration with other information systems used in the university
Potential for advanced learning analytics
Availability of many features common to LMS that reduce the workload of teachers
Middleware component (BOS service) is under control of academia
Setting up a PLE is more complex procedure;
Further development and administration of BOS service requires efforts
Advantages vs. disadvantages
ICALT 2015, Hualien, Taiwan 20
Conclusion The new software development projects in the TEL domain
are initiated due to low satisfaction with existing socio-technical paradigm. This paper demonstrated how such initiatives can be analysed from the dialectical perspective
Dialectical analysis helps us to understand oppositional nature of driving forces (emotions, preferences, perceived needs, concepts) behind the software project
Dialectical analysis lead the developers towards overcoming a binary opposition and seek the dialectical synthesis that makes use of the best from both sides: an existing, mature socio-technical regime and its innovative challenger