exploiting unmanned aircraft systems · pdf fileexploiting unmanned aircraft systems dr....
TRANSCRIPT
1
AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2010
Exploiting Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Dr. Werner J.A. Dahm
USAF Chief Scientist
Air Force Pentagon
Headquarters U.S. Air Force 21 April 2010
Their Role in Future Military Operations
and the Emergent Technologies that
will Shape Their Development
2
Current Unmanned Aircraft Systems of the U.S. Air Force and DoD
U.S. Army
MQ-1C WarriorRQ-7 Shadow
RQ-11 Raven
Wasp III BATMAV
U.S. Navy / Marines
RQ-2 Pioneer
RQ-11 Raven Scan Eagle
RQ-8 Fire Scout
U.S. Air ForceRQ-4 Global Hawk
MQ-1 PredatorMQ-9 Reaper
RQ-11 Raven
Wasp III BATMAV
RQ-170
Sentinel
USAF Need for RPA Pilots, Operators, and Ground Crews is Growing Quickly
2004 2009 2011
RQ-4 Global Hawk MQ-1 Predator MQ-9 Reaper
4
5
Emerging Roles and New Concepts forLarge and Medium Size UAVs
UAS moving beyond traditional
surveillance and kinetic strike roles
Longer-endurance missions require
high-efficiency engine technologies
In-flight automated refueling will be
key for expanding UAS capabilities
May include ISR functions beyond
traditional electro-optic surveillance
LO may allow ops in contested or
denied (non-permissive) areas
Electronic warfare (EW) by stand-in
jamming is a possible future role
Wide-area airborne surveillance
(WAAS) is increasingly important
Directed energy strike capability is
likely to grow (laser and HPM)
Civil uses include border patrol and
interdiction, and humanitarian relief
6
Ultra-Long Endurance Unmanned Aircraft
New unmanned aircraft systems (VULTURE)
and airships (ISIS) can remain aloft for years
Delicate lightweight structures can survive
low-altitude winds if launch can be chosen
Enabled by solar cells powering lightweight
batteries or regenerative fuel cell systems
Large airships containing football field size
radars give extreme resolution/persistence
7
New Multi-Spot EO/IR Sensors for UAVs
Multi-spot EO/IR cameras allow individually
steered low frame rate spots; augment FMV
Gorgon Stare now; ARGUS-IS will allow 65
spots using a 1.8 giga-pixel sensor at 15 Hz
Individually controllable spot coverage goes
directly to ROVER terminals on ground
Autonomous Real-Time Ground Ubiquitous
Surveillance - Imaging System (ARGUS-IS)
8
New LIDAR Systems Allow Large-Area Three-Dimensional Urban Mapping
Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) allows
3D sensing with light-wavelength resolution
Allows detailed mapping of complex urban
areas from unmanned airborne systems
Merge with EO/IR images to give enhanced
spatial cognition and situational awareness
Low-collateral-damage strikes in urban
areas via target-quality 3D pixel coordinates
UAS Automated Aerial Refueling (AAR)
Aerial refueling of UAVs from USAF tanker fleet is
essential for increasing range and endurance
Requires location sensing and relative navigation
to approach, hold, and move into fueling position
Precision GPS can be employed to obtain needed
positional information
Once UAV has autonomously flown into contact
position, boom operator engages as normal
Key issues include position-keeping with possible
GPS obscuration by tanker and gust/wake stability
9
10
Flight Testing of UAS AAR Algorithms
August 2006 initial flight tests of AFRL-developed
control algorithms for automated aerial refueling
KC-135 with Learjet-surrogate UAS platform gave
first “hands-off” approach to contact position
Subsequent positions and pathways flight test
and four-ship CONOPS simulations successful
120 mins continuous “hands-off” station keeping
in contact position; approach from ½-mile away
12 hrs of “hands-off” formation flight with tanker
including autonomous position-holding in turns
Position-holding matched human-piloted flight
11
Increased Autonomy in UAS Missions
Autonomous mission optimization under
dynamic circumstances is a key capability
Must address UAV platform degradation as
well as changes in operating environment
Operator only declares mission intent and
constraints; UAV finds best execution path
Vigilent Spirit is current implementation
12
Distributed/Cooperative Control of UAVs
Optimized scalable solution methods
for multiple heterogeneous UAVs
Allows multiple UAVs to act as single
coordinated unit to meet mission need
Scalability of methods is essential to
allow future application to larger sets
np-hard problem; exponential growth
13
Distributed/Cooperative Control of UAVs
Task coupling of multiple UAVs is key in
complex environments; e.g. urban areas
Must include variable autonomy to allow
flexible operator interaction with UAVs
Allow dynamic task re-assignment while
reducing overall operator workload
Demonstrated in Talisman Saber 2009
16
Integration of UAS Operations in National,
International, and Military Airspace
Authority:
Federal Aviation Authority (FAA)
Separation:
Cooperative: TCAS / ADS-B
Non-Cooperative: Visual
Airfields:
Friendly and well known
International AirspaceNational Airspace Military Airspace
Collision
Avoidance
Conflict
Avoidance
Authority:
Int’l. Civil Aviation Org. (ICAO)
Separation:
Cooperative: TCAS
Non-Cooperative: Visual
Airfields:
Limited access, not well known
Authority:
Department of Defense (DoD)
Separation:
Cooperative: IFF
Non-Cooperative: Radar, Visual
Airfields:
Limited, austere, security
17
UAS Autonomous Collision Avoidance
and Terminal Airspace Operations
Must address all aspects of UAV situational
awareness and control
Airspace deconfliction, air-ground collision
avoidance, terminal area operations
Must be immune to UAS “lost-link” cases;
“remotely-piloted” becomes “unmanned”
Surface avoidance (vehicles, obstructions)
U-270K
60K
Global Hawk
Heron 1
Predator A
50K
40K
30K
20K
10K
Alt
itu
de
1020
30Endurance (hours)
Hermes, Aerostar,
Eagle Eye, Fire
Scout, Hunter
Heron 2
Predator B
18
“Sense-and-Avoid” (SAA) System for
In-Flight Collision Avoidance
Sense-and-Avoid was Global Hawk ATD
for in-flight collision avoidance system
Flight on surrogate aircraft began 2006
Autonomous detection and avoidance of
cooperative & non-cooperative intruders
Jointly Optimal Collision Avoidance
(JOCA) was transition program in 2009
19
Developing Increased Trust in Autonomy:
Verification & Validation of UAS Control
Flight Control Requirements
Control Design
Control Analysis
Software Requirements
Software Design
Software Implementation
Software Test & Integration
System Requirements
System Architecture Design
System Verification & Validation
System Architecture Analysis
Systems and software V&V is a
major cost and schedule driver
High level of autonomy in UAVs
will require new V&V methods
IVHM for mission survivability
Complex adaptive systems with
autonomous reconfigurability
Approach infinite-state system
even for moderate autonomy
Data/communication drop-outs
and latencies make even harder
Traditional methods based on
requirements traceability fail
Extremely challenging problem;
must overcome for UAS “trust”
Requires entirely new approach
20
“Formal Methods” vs “Run-Time Method”
for V&V of UAS Control Systems
Formal methods for finite-state systems
based on abstraction and model-based
checking do not extend to such systems
Probabilistic or statistical tests do not
provide the needed levels of assurance;
set of possible inputs is far too large
Classical problem of “proving that failure
will not occur” is the central challenge
Run-time approach circumvents usual
limitation by inserting monitor/checker
and simpler verifiable back-up controller
Monitor system state during run-time and
check against acceptable limits
Switch to simpler back-up controller if
state exceeds limits
Simple back-up controller is verifiable by
traditional finite-state methods
Run-time
V&V system
21
Batteries & Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuel Cells
Will Be Needed to Power Small UAVs
Small UAVs need suitable power source
for propulsion and on-board systems
Desired endurance times (> 8 hrs) cause
battery weight to exceed lift capacity; IC
engine fuel efficiencies are too low
Fuel cells give lightweight power system
but must operate on logistical LHC fuel
JP kerosene fuels ideal, liquid propane is
usable; need on-board fuel processor
Solid-oxide fuel cells are best to date;
current record held by U. Michigan team
> 9 hrs aloft with propane in small UAV
22
MAVs: New Aerodynamic Regimes and
Microelectromechanical Components
Micro UAVs open up new opportunities
for close-in sensing in urban areas
Low-speed, high-maneuverability, and
hovering not suited even to small UAVs
Size and speed regime creates low-Re
aerodynamic effects; fixed-wing UAVs
become impractical as size decreases
Rotary-wing and biomimetic flapping-
wing configurations are best at this size
Requires lightweight flexible structures
and unsteady aero-structural coupling
23
Low Reynolds Number Flow Associated
with Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicles
Unsteady aerodynamics w/ strong coupling
to flexible structures is poorly understood
AFRL water tunnel with large pitch-plunge
mechanism allows groundbreaking studies
Advanced diagnostics (SPIV) combined with
CFD are giving insights on effective designs
MAV aerodynamics, structures, and control
are accessible to university-scale studies
24
AMASE: Air Force Research Laboratory’s
AVTAS Multi-Agent Simulation Environment
Desktop simulation environment developed
at AFRL for UAV cooperative control studies
Used within AFRL to develop and optimize
multiple-UAV engagement approaches
Public-released by AFRL to universities; no
license restrictions and no acquisition cost
Self-contained simulation environment that
accelerates iterative development/analysis
AMASE User Interface
25
AMASE Can Be Used to Develop/Assess
New Collaborative Control Algorithms
Example shows comparison of control laws for
mission with multiple areas and no-enter zones
Heterogeneous UAVs make intuitive approach
too complex; results show performance differs
Allows effectiveness of control algorithms to
be quantitatively assessed and compared
Enabled maturation of process algebra laws for
UAVs flown in Talisman Saber 2009
AMASE modeling details are documented and
publicly available in AIAA-2009-6139
Comparison of two cooperative
UAS control systems
26
Concluding Remarks
We are still at the very early stages of
UAS evolution, roughly where aircraft
were after WWI; much is changing
Developments over next decade will
span from large UAVs to MAVs as key
technologies and missions evolve:
Advanced platforms and sensors
Operations in non-permissive areas
Automated aerial refueling
Coordinated control of multiple UAVs
UAS integration across airspace
V&V to provide trust in autonomy
Creative approaches and technology
advances will be needed to exploit the
full potential that UAVs can offer