explaining the volume-cost relationship for cancer surgery vivian ho phd a meei-hsiang ku-goto ma a...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Explaining the Volume-Cost Relationship for Cancer SurgeryVivian Ho PhDa Meei-Hsiang Ku-Goto MAaand Thomas Aloia MDb
aRice University and Baylor College of MedicinebMD Anderson Cancer Center*This research was supported by grant number 1R01 CA 138640-01 A2 from the NationalCancer Institute.
-
Are there determinants of high quality, low cost cancer surgery?*
-
Background*
-
BackgroundHigher surgeon volume lowered hospital costs for 6 cancer operations. (Ho and Aloia, Medical Care 2008)Higher hospital volume lowered costs only for colectomy.
Do high volume hospitals spend more to improve outcomes?Broader range of specialists?Advanced ICUs and technology-based services?
*
-
This study*
-
DataSEER-Medicare filesPatients diagnosed 2001-2005, Medicare claims through 2007.
MedPAR files linked to Carrier claims.Patients who received cancer surgery for 2005-2009.
*
-
*Methods
Dependent VariablesRegressorsHospital characteristicsSurgeon characteristicsPatient characteristics
-
Methods*
-
Methods*
-
MethodsRegressions include year and hospital fixed effects.
Coefficient on volume measures effects of within-hospital changes in volume. Cant specify volume in categories.
Standard errors adjusted for clustering of unobservables across patients within hospitals.*
-
Methods*
-
Methods*
-
Methods*
-
*
AHRQ Hospital-level Patient Safety Indicators Complications of anesthesia (PSI 1)Death in low mortality DRGs (PSI 2)Decubitus ulcer (PSI 3)Failure to rescue (PSI 4)Foreign body left in during procedure (PSI 5)Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PSI 6)Selected infections due to medical care (PSI 7)Postoperative hip fracture (PSI 8)Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma (PSI 9)Postoperative physiologic and metabolic derangements (PSI 10)Postoperative respiratory failure (PSI 11)Postoperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (PSI 12)Postoperative sepsis (PSI 13)Postoperative wound dehiscence in abdominopelvic surgical patients (PSI 14)Accidental puncture and laceration (PSI 15)Transfusion reaction (PSI 16)
-
Costly Hospital ServicesNurse-to-patient ratiosHospital has CT ScannerHospital has Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT)Hospital has Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Hospital has Multi-slice spiral computed tomographyHospital has Positron emission tomography
-
Processes of CareArterial Line Transfusion packed red blood cells or auto-transfusion Critical Care Consultations Central Venous Catheter Daily Epidural Management Epidural Anesthesia Frozen Section Incidental Appendectomy Inpatient Consultations Pulmonary Artery Catheter Re-intubation Total Parenteral Nutrition Total claimed hours for anesthesia
-
*Figure 1: Hospital Costs by Hospital and Surgeon Volume (SEER)
-
*
Figure 2: PhysicianReimbursements byHospital and SurgeonVolume (SEER)
- *Determinants of ln(Hospital Costs + Physician Payments)Colon Resection (SEER Medicare data)All regressions include patient and hospital characteristics, mean nurse wages, and the nurse-to-patient ratio.t-statistics in parentheses*p
- *Determinants of ln(Hospital Costs + Physician Payments)Pancreatic Resection (SEER Medicare data)All regressions include patient and hospital characteristics, mean nurse wages, and the nurse-to-patient ratio.t-statistics in parentheses*p
-
Summary of SEER Results*
-
Summary of SEER Results*
-
Summary of SEER Results*
-
Caveats*
-
Pancreatic Resection Volume, CMS
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax20051314912722006131191254200713138126720081512712542009151381259
-
Pancreatic Resection Volume, SEER
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax200113131110200214151213200314141210200416161314200515191313
-
Top 5 Hospitals by Pancreatic Resection Volume, CMS 2005
Hospital NameVolumeCityStateSEERJohns Hopkins Hospital149BaltimoreMDNoClarian Health Partners108IndianapolisINNoMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center94New YorkNYYesMassachusetts General Hospital80BostonMANoSaint Marys Hospital77RochesterMNNo
-
Within Provider Change in VolumePancreatic Resection, 2005-2009
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax-73-222-35027
-
Average Cost per Pancreatic Resection Patient
Chart1
39304.96
38526.125
39182.859
37285.536
35566.749
Cost per Patient
Sheet1
YearCost per Patient
200539304.96
200638526.125
200739182.859
200837285.536
200935566.749
To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.
-
Pancreatic Resection Total Cost Regression, FE*All regressions include year dummies.
(1) No Controls(2) + Patient Variables(3) + Hospital VariablesHospital volume0.000663(0.97)-0.000182(-0.31)-0.0000263(-0.07)Surgeon volume= ln(surgeon volume/10)-0.0503***(-6.13)-0.0407***(-5.22)-0.0429***(-5.88)Patient VariablesXXNurse-to-patient ratio0.0267***(3.96)Hospital VariablesX
N135721237712348
-
Pancreatic Resection Total Cost Regression, FE*Regression includes year dummies and patient and hospital characteristics.
(4)+ Safety IndicatorsHospital volume-0.000193(-0.40)Postop hemorrhage or hematoma0.444***(9.14)Surgeon volume= ln(surgeon volume/10)-0.0357***(-4.76)Postop physio metabol derangement0.280(1.35)Complications of anesthesia-0.0346(-0.27)Postop respiratory failure0.537***(15.84)Decubitus ulcer0.338***(6.19)Postoperative pe or dvt0.303***(10.75)Death among surgical0.275***(5.19)Postoperative wound dehiscence0.503***(5.33)Foreign body left in during proc-0.408***(-5.99)Accidental puncture/laceration0.143***(5.17)Iatrogenic pneumothorax0.152(1.64)
N12348
-
Pancreatic Resection Total Cost Regression, FE*Regression includes year dummies, patient and hospital characteristics, and PSIs.
(5)+ Birkmeyer Processes of CareHospital volume-0.000661(-1.41)Daily Epidural Management-0.00869(-0.65)Surgeon volume= ln(surgeon volume/10)-0.0193**(-3.07)Re-intubation0.253***(8.36)Incidental Appendectomy0.0131(0.27)Transfusion/auto-transfusion-0.0217* (-2.08)Arterial Line0.0660***(6.84)Critical Care Consultations0.285***(18.83)Central Venous Catheter0.0150(0.26)Total Parenteral Nutrition0.148***(6.94)Epidural Anesthesia-0.00500(-0.39)Inpatient Consultations0.216***(17.66)Frozen Section-0.00557(-0.52)Operating Room Time0.0383***(18.34)Pulmonary Artery Catheter0.190***(8.15)
N11877
-
Lobectomy Volume, CMS
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax20051625513822006162301382200717219138620081822313932009192361377
-
Lobectomy Volume, SEER
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax20011106316642002110701673200311170176220041126317662005112611865
-
Top 5 Hospitals by Lobectomy Volume, CMS 2005
Hospital NameVolumeCityStateSEERMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center255New YorkNYYesH Lee Moffitt Cancer Center151TampaFLNoSaint Marys Hospital151RochesterMNNoNew York-Presbyterian Hospital129New YorkNYNoUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center111HoustonTXNo
-
Within Provider Change in VolumeLobectomy, 2005-2009
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax-58036-37153
-
Average Cost per Lobectomy Patient
Chart1
23292.178
23285.009
22926.612
22245.323
21858.237
Cost per Patient
Sheet1
YearCost per Patient
200523292.178
200623285.009
200722926.612
200822245.323
200921858.237
To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.
-
Lobectomy Total Cost Regression, FE*All regressions include year dummies.
(1) No Controls(2) + Patient Variables(3) + Hospital VariablesHospital volume=(hospital volume/100)^3-0.0149**(-2.78)0.00845(0.63)0.00760(0.58)Surgeon volume=(surgeon volume/10)^.5-0.0487***(-4.16)-0.0403***(-4.32)-0.0403***(-4.31)Patient VariablesXXNurse-to-patient ratio0.00938*(2.36)Hospital VariablesX
N570205283552675
-
Lobectomy Total Cost Regression, FE*Regression includes year dummies and patient and hospital characteristics.
(4) + Safety IndicatorsHospital volume=(hospital volume/100)^30.00990(0.67)Postoperative hip fracture0.404**(2.72)Surgeon volume=(surgeon volume/10)^.5-0.0391***(-4.58)Postop hemorrhage or hematoma0.360***(5.29)Complications of anesthesia0.0611(0.82)Postop physio metabol derangement0.385***(5.65)Decubitus ulcer0.494***(10.74)Postop respiratory failure0.770***(37.43)Death among surgical0.537***(19.57)Postoperative pe or dvt0.349***(14.91)Foreign body left in during proc0.200(1.41)Accidental puncture/laceration0.191***(10.20)Iatrogenic pneumothorax0.0336***(3.32)
N52675
-
Lobectomy Total Cost Regression, FE*Regression includes year dummies, patient and hospital characteristics, and PSIs.
(5) + Birkmeyer Processes of CareHospital volume=(hospital volume/100)^30.0116(0.91)Daily Epidural Management0.0158**(2.92)Surgeon volume=(surgeon volume/10)^.5-0.0048(-0.66)Re-intubation0.412***(31.60)Incidental Appendectomy1.250***(4.78)Transfusion/auto-transfusion0.0954***(16.61)Arterial Line0.0180***(4.01)Critical Care Consultations0.282***(30.11)Central Venous Catheter0.122*(2.52)Total Parenteral Nutrition0.313***(11.20)Epidural Anesthesia-0.00768(-1.62)Inpatient Consultations0.186***(34.42)Frozen Section0.0426***(10.63)Operating Room Time0.0742***(33.22)Pulmonary Artery Catheter0.177***(11.04)
N48689
-
Colon Resection Volume, CMS
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax2005123368177020061233721784200712434516832008127342168020091252531558
-
Colon Resection Volume, SEER
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax20051249615362006126127164120071251041636200812510616272009125981637
-
Top 5 Hospitals by Colon Resection Volume, CMS 2005
Hospital NameVolumeCityStateSEERFlorida Hospital368OrlandoFLNoNew York-Presbyterian Hospital291New YorkNYNoChristiana Care Health System264NewarkDENoMethodist Hospital262San AntonioTXNoBeaumont Hospital Royal Oak252Royal OakMIYes
-
Within Provider Change in VolumeColon Resection, 2005-2009
HospitalSurgeonMinMedMaxMinMedMax-647147-22356
-
Average Cost per Colon Resection Patient
Chart1
19916.529
20385.956
20255.139
19934.386
20606.862
Cost per Patient
Sheet1
YearCost per Patient
200519916.529
200620385.956
200720255.139
200819934.386
200920606.862
To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.
-
Colon Resection Total Cost Regression, FE*All regressions include year dummies.
(1) No Controls(2) + Patient Variables(3) + Hospital VariablesHospital volume0.000149(1.01)-0.0000399(-0.31)-0.0000180(-0.14)Surgeon volume-0.00532***(-16.35)-0.00201***(-9.07)-0.00202***(-9.08)Patient VariablesXXNurse-to-patient ratio0.0104***(3.74)Hospital VariablesX
N160712149803148925
-
Colon Resection Total Cost Regression, FE*Regression includes year dummies and patient and hospital characteristics.
(4) + Safety IndicatorsHospital volume0.0000110(0.09)Postop hemorrhage or hematoma0.458***(15.73)Surgeon volume-0.00187***(-8.52)Postop physio metabol derangement0.525***(8.63)Complications of anesthesia-0.133*(-2.50)Postop respiratory failure0.631***(45.37)Decubitus ulcer0.320***(18.70)Postoperative pe or dvt0.365***(34.24)Death among surgical0.274***(15.55)Postoperative wound dehiscence0.677***(27.33)Foreign body left in during proc0.216*(2.03)Accidental puncture/laceration0.209***(22.38)Iatrogenic pneumothorax0.350***(9.11)Transfusion reaction-0.0720***(-10.43)Postoperative hip fracture0.614***(5.75)
N148925
-
Colon Resection Total Cost Regression, FE*Regression includes year dummies, patient and hospital characteristics, and PSIs.
(5) + Birkmeyer Processes of CareHospital volume-0.000101(-0.92)Daily Epidural Management0.0259***(5.05)Surgeon volume-0.000370(-1.87)Re-intubation0.260***(27.95)Incidental Appendectomy0.0303***(4.57)Transfusion/auto-transfusion0.0831***(27.13)Arterial Line0.157***(36.19)Critical Care Consultations0.331***(66.48)Central Venous Catheter0.00459(0.15)Total Parenteral Nutrition0.238***(42.61)Epidural Anesthesia-0.00146(-0.30)Inpatient Consultations0.242***(74.07)Frozen Section0.0632***(15.31)Operating Room Time0.0893***(36.53)Pulmonary Artery Catheter0.189***(13.15)
N138488
-
Policy ImplicationsSurgeon volume is more closely associated with average costs than hospital volume.Given that higher surgeon volume lowers mortality, should states report surgeon volumes & mortality?
Processes of care explain much of the surgeon volume-cost relationship.
*
-
Conclusions*
-
Caveats*
*Note: Real costs per patient fell over time.
**These variables have not been included in the regression results for SEER data yet.*Natural log scale masks potentially large differences in mean costs. (inverse ln of 8.9 and 9.0 are $7,331 and $8.103 respectively). Predicted costs appear lower for patients in lower tertile of hosp volume (1 to 35/yr) relative to highest tertile (>65)*Mcare only values***Mcare only values*WANT TO INCLUDE THOSE NOT IN SAMPLE?*Mcare only values*