expert working group on gtld directory services: initial report 2biniti al%2breport report for alac...

12
Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report http://www.icann.org/en/gsearch/E WG%2BInitial%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton Samuels

Upload: ryan-phillips

Post on 27-Mar-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report

http://www.icann.org/en/gsearch/EWG%2BInitial%2BReport

Report for ALAC DiscussionCarlton Samuels

Page 2: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial Report

What Needs Fixing?• Ability/Willingness of Registrars to

verify/validate Whois Data• Dependence on individual registrars

for access to/reliance on Whois data• All registrant data potentially

accessible globally• Unregulated privacy/proxy servers

Page 3: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial Report

Page 4: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial ReportWhat is Being Proposed

Page 5: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial ReportUsers of Registration Data

Page 6: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial Working GroupPermitted Purposes for Data Use

Page 7: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial ReportARDS Model• Registrar collects registrant data – gTLD

registry. gTLD registries hold authoritative data• ARDS (or other repository) as non-authoritative

repository of all all collected data elements• Requestors apply for access to data – obtain

access to non-authoritative, or special cases, authoritative data

• ARDS repository provides validation of data, handling and auditing access, handling complaints and imposing penalties for inappropriate access

Page 8: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial ReportGated Access Model

Page 9: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial Report

Advantages:• One Stop shop for requestors• Greater accountability for data validation

and access abuse• Standardizes access approaches to meet

privacy requirements• Enables more efficient accuracy checks• Enables search portal in multiple

languages

Page 10: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial Report

Disadvantages• Data latency• Creation of a ‘big data’ source• Increased risk of insider abuse• Registries/registrars no longer

control delivery of registration data

Page 11: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

EWG: Initial Report

Issues for discussion:• Support for the ARDS generally?• Location of repository?• Whois data: enough/too little/too much• Accuracy checks on data – who and how?• Permitted (or not) uses• Permitted (or not) users• Penalties – for whom/for what/what

authority• Timeline?

Page 12: Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services: Initial Report 2BIniti al%2BReport Report for ALAC Discussion Carlton

Thank you