experimental study on glass fiber reinforced geopolymer ... · 1 experimental study on glass fiber...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Experimental Study on Glass Fiber Reinforced
Geopolymer Concrete Madhava Perumal .R
1, J.Jasper Daniel
2, Suriya .S
3, Vignesh .R
4
1,2 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College
3,4UG Students Department of Civil Engineering, Rajalakshmi Engineering College
Abstract - This paper examines that thus Geo-polymer based Concrete is highly environment friendly and
the same time it can be made a high-performance concrete. In the present study, 100% replacement of
conventional ordinary Portland cement is made by using class F fly ash, Ground granulated blast furnace
slag and catalytic liquids or AAS to prepare Geo-polymer concrete mixes. In our present study we
evaluated strength characteristics of Geo polymer concrete by varying the percentage of glass fiber for
M40 grade of concrete. The work has been done to structural specimen like cylinders, beams and cubes
and evaluated compressive, split tensile strength, flexural strength for different binding material
proportions and solution concentration. Glass fibers were added to the mix in the volume fractions of
0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04% volume of the concrete. Present study shall be a right step forward in
reducing consumption of natural sand and consuming higher volumes of fly ash available in Chennai
region together with fibers for sustainable and durable concrete.
Keywords: geo-polymer concrete, fly ash, glass fibre compressive strength, split tensile strength.
I. INTRODUCTION
Concrete is one of the most widely used construction material. Portland cement production is a major
contributor to carbon-di-oxide emissions .The global warming is caused by the emission of greenhouse gases,
such as carbon-di-oxide, to the atmosphere by human activities. Among the greenhouse gases, carbon-di-oxide
contributes about 65% of global warming. Many efforts are being made in order to reduce the use of Portland
cement in concrete. These efforts include the utilization of supplementary cementing materials such as fly ash,
silica fume, granulated blast furnace slag, rice-husk ash, Metakaolin and finding alternative binders to Portland
cement.
Geo-polymer is used as the binder, instead of cement paste, to produce concrete. The geo-polymer
paste binds the loose coarse aggregates, fine aggregates and other unreacted materials together to form the geo-
polymer concrete. The manufacture of geo-polymer concrete is carried out using the usual concrete technology
methods. As in the Portland cement concrete, the aggregates occupy the largest volume, that is, approximately
75 to 80% by mass, in geo-polymer concrete. The silicon and the aluminum in the fly ash are activated by a
combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions to form the geo-polymer paste that binds the
aggregates.
The production of one ton of cement emits approximately one ton carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, which
leads to global warming conditions. So, one of the ways to produce environmentally friendly concrete is to
reduce the use of Ordinary Portland Cement by replacing cement with by-product materials such as fly ash. One
of the efforts to produce more environmentally friendly concrete is to replace the Portland cement in concrete
with by-product materials such as fly ash. An effort to make environmentally friendly concrete is the
development of inorganic alumina-silicate polymer, such as fly ash that are rich in silicon and aluminium called
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:135
2
Geo-polymer. Synthesized from materials of geological origin or by-product materials such as Fly ash that are
rich in Silicon and Aluminum. GGBS (Ground Granulated Blast Slag) is a waste material Generated in iron or
Slag Industries have significant impact on Strength and Durability of Geo-polymer Concrete. Fiber reinforced
cement or concrete is a relatively new composite material in which fibers are introduced in the matrix as micro
reinforcement, so as to improve the tensile, cracking and other properties of concrete. Glass fiber is a material
consisting of numerous extremely fine fibers of glass. GFRC has been used for the past 30 years to produce
many concrete products, especially thin architectural cladding panels, but also for ornamental concrete such as
domes, statues, planters, and fountains. Recently, decorative concrete artisans have discovered the benefits of
GFRC for decorative panels such as fireplace surrounds, concrete countertops, and artificial rock work.
II. MATERIALS
The material used in this project is fly ash, GGBS, glass fiber, geo polymer solution fine aggregate and
coarse aggregate. The properties of the material is notified below .The following flow chart will be used to
explain brief about this project.
A. Fly ash
Fly ash is one of the residues created during the combustion of coal in coal-fired power plants. Fine
particles rise with flue gasses and are collected with filter bags or electrostatic precipitator’s Fly ash is a waste
by-product material that must be disposed of or recycled.
B. Alkaline liquids
A combination of sodium silicate solution and sodium hydroxide solution was chosen as the alkaline
liquid.Sodium based solution were chosen because they were cheaper than potassium based solution.Sodium
hydroxide solution with the concentration of 8 M consisted of 8*40=320g of sodium hydroxide per litre of
solution.Alkaline liquids are used in ratio of 1:2 (NaOH:Na2SiO3)
C. Coarse aggregates
Coarse aggregate comprising of maximum size of 20 mm, having fineness modulus of 7.29,specific
gravity of 2.67,water absorption of 0.9% and impact value is 7.3%
D. Fine aggregates
Fine aggregates having fineness modulus of 2.76,specific gravity of 2.7,water absorption of 1%
E. Glass fibre
Glass fibres are made of silicon oxide with addition of small amounts of other oxides. Glass fibres are
characteristic for their high strength, good temperature and corrosion resistance, and low price. Alkali resistant
E-glass fibres of 12mm length, 0.014mm nominal diameter, specific gravity of 1.9 and density of 2650 kg/m3
were used.
F. Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS)
Granulated Blast Furnace Slag is obtained by rapidly chilling (quenching) the molten ash from the furnace with
the help of water. During this process, the slag gets fragmented and transformed into amorphous granules
(glass), meeting the requirement of IS 12089:1987 (manufacturing specification for granulated slag used in
Portland Slag Cement). The granulated slag is ground to desired fineness for producing GGBS. The chemical
composition of JSW’s GGBS contributes to the production of superior cement. Over the period of time, its load-
bearing properties continue to increase as it absorbs surplus lime released during hydration to form more
calcium silicate hydrates. These hydrates add to the strength of the cement.
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:136
3
III. MIX PROPORTION
By the Replacement of 40% of fly ash and 60% of GGBS instead of OPC,fine aggregate and coarse
aggregate were mixed together as a dry mix for 4minutes and the Glass fibers are reinforced with
0%,0.01%,0.02%, 0.03%,0.04% by volume of concrete alkaline activator are add by ratio of 1:2
(NaOH:Na2SIO3)
TABLE 1
MIX PROPORTION TABLE OF GFRGPC
Material Glass
fiber 0%
Glass fiber
0.01%
Glass fiber
0.02%
Glass fiber
0.03%
Glass fiber
0.04%
Coarse aggregate
(Kg / m3)
1053.63 1053.63 1053.63 1053.63 1053.63
Fine aggregate
(Kg / m3)
762.98 762.98 762.98 762.98 762.98
Fly ash (class F)
(Kg / m3)
160.932 160.932 160.932 160.932 160.932
GGBS (Kg / m3) 241.39 241.39 241.39 241.39 241.39
Na OH :Na2Sio3 1 : 2 1 : 2 1 : 2 1 : 2 1 : 2
Na OH (Kg / m3) 60.35 60.35 60.35 60.35 60.35
Na2Sio3 (Kg / m3) 120.7 120.7 120.7 120.7 120.7
Alkaline solution / (FA +
GGBS)
0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45
GLASS FIBER
(gm / m3)
0 240 480 720 960
IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
TABLE 2
SLUMP TEST
C.C GFGPC
0%
GFGPC
0.01%
GFGPC
0.02%
GFGPC
0.03%
GRGPC
0.04%
Slump value
(mm)
80 95 80 85 85 80
Degree of workability Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium
TABLE 3
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:137
4
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Test average compressive strength of GPC and GFGPS at the 7 and 28 days for ambient curing
Sample ID for GFRGPC Age of concrete Compressive strength(n/mm²)
CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE 7 DAYS 34.1
0.00% 7 DAYS 32.7
0.01% 7 DAYS 34.1
0.02% 7 DAYS 35.0
0.03% 7 DAYS 35.4
0.04% 7 DAYS 33.6
CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE 28 DAYS 44.3
0.00% 28 DAYS 47.9
0.01% 28 DAYS 50.1
0.02% 28 DAYS 51.2
0.03% 28 DAYS 52.1
0.04% 28 DAYS 48.8
Fig 1 Comparison of Compressive Strength for Conventional Concrete with different proportion
In concrete testing, compressive strength is considered to be of paramount importance. Compressive
strength of Geo polymer concrete is dependent on the alkaline activator solution used, glass fiber, mix
proportion of fly ash and GGBS in the place of cement. The test was performed under ambient curing
conditions. Results indicate that fly ash and GGBS based geo polymer concrete achieves very good compressive
strength then conventional concrete. A maximum strength was achieved at 0.04% of glass fiber and ratio of
40:60 of fly ash and GGBS proportion at 7th
day is 35.4 KN/mm² and 28th
day is 52.1 KN/mm².
34,1 32,7 34,1 35 35,4 33,6
44,3 47,91 50,1 51,2 52,1
48,8
C.C 0% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03% 0.04%
N /
mm
2
% GLASS FIBER
COMPRESSION SRENGTH TEST
7 DAYS 28 DAYS
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:138
5
TABLE 4
SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH TEST
Test average Split tensile strength of GPC and GFGPS at the age of 28 days for ambient curing
Sample ID for GFRGPC Age of concrete SplitTensile strength(N/mm²)
CONVENTIONL CONCRETE 28 DAYS 4.43
0.00% 28 DAYS 4.3
0.01% 28 DAYS 4.59
0.02% 28 DAYS 4.88
0.03% 28 DAYS 5.09
0.04% 28 DAYS 4.48
Fig 2 Split Tensile Strength Comparison of Conventional Concrete with different proportion
In concrete testing, compressive strength is considered to be of paramount importance. Split tensile
strength of Geo polymer concrete is dependent on the alkaline activator solution used, glass fiber, mix
proportion of fly ash and GGBS in the place of cement. The test was performed under ambient curing
conditions. Results indicate that fly ash and GGBS based geo polymer concrete achieves very good split tensile
strength then conventional concrete. A maximum strength was achieved at 0.03% of glass fiber and ratio of
40:60 of fly ash and GGBS proportion at and 28th
day is 5.09 KN/mm²
TABLE 5
FLEXURAL STRENGTH TEST
Test average Flexural strength of GPC and GFGPS at the age of 28 days for ambient curing
Sample ID for
GFRGPC
Age of concrete Flexural strength(N/mm²)
CONVENTIONL
CONCRETE
28 DAYS 6.24
0.00% 28 DAYS 6.66
0.01% 28 DAYS 6.98
0.02% 28 DAYS 7.14
0.03% 28 DAYS 7.26
0.04% 28 DAYS 7.42
4,43 4,3
4,59
4,88 5,09
4,48
C.C 0% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03% 0.04%
N /
mm
2
% GLASS FIBER
SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH
28 DAYS
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:139
6
Fig 3 Flexural Strength Comparison of Conventional Concrete with different proportion
In concrete testing, compressive strength is considered to be of paramount importance. Flexural
strength of Geo polymer concrete is dependent on the alkaline activator solution used, glass fiber, mix
proportion of fly ash and GGBS in the place of cement. The test was performed under ambient curing
conditions. Results indicate that fly ash and GGBS based geo polymer concrete achieves very good flexural
strength then conventional concrete. A maximum strength was achieved at 0.04% of glass fiber and ratio of
40:60 of fly ash and GGBS proportion at and 28th
day 7.42 KN/mm²
V. CONCLUSION
In this project, we have geo polymer concrete in which the cement is fully replaced by 40% of Fly
ash, 60% of GGBS and the Glass fiber is added to increase the strength of the concrete in proportion of
0%,0.01%, 0.02%,0.03%,0.04%. It is found that the compressive strength of the conventional concrete at the
end of 28th day is 44.3 N/mm2. Initially the compressive strength of the geo polymer concrete at 0% of glass
fiber is 47.9 N/mm2 which is higher than the conventional concrete and this maximum strength attained at
0.03% addition of glass fiber (i.e.) 52.1 N/mm2 and it decreases for further replacement of 0.04%. The Split
tensile strength of the conventional concrete at the end of 28th day is 4.43 N/mm2. Initially the Split tensile
strength of the geo polymer concrete at 0% of glass fiber is 4.3 N/mm2 which is higher than the conventional
concrete and the maximum strength attained at 0.03% addition of glass fiber (i.e.) 5.09N/mm2 and it decreases
for further replacement of 0.04%. For flexural strength the maximum strength is attained at 0.04% addition of
glass fiber (i.e.) 7.42N/mm2. It is higher then conventional concrete. Hence 0.03% addition of glass fiber is
recommended to increase the strength of the concrete.
6,24
6,66 6,98
7,14 7,26 7,42
C.C 0% 0.01% 0.02% 0.03% 0.04%
N /
mm
2
% GLASS FIBER
FLEXURAL STRENGTH
28 DAYS
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:140
7
REFERENCES
[1] K. Vijaia, R. Kumuthaaand B.G.Vishnuramb, “Properties of glass fibre reinforced geopolymer
concrete composites”.Asian journal of civil engineering (building and housing) vol. 13, no. 4 (2012)
pages 511-520.
[2] Mr.R.Balamurugan, “Experimential investigation of glass fibre reinforced geo polymer
concrete”.IRACST - Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal (ESTIJ), ISSN:
2250-3498 Vol.7, No.2, Mar-April 2017
[3] Choi Y, Yuan RL. Experimental relationship between splitting tensile strength and compressive
strength of GFRC and PFRC, Cement and Concrete Research, 35(2005) 1587-91.
[4] Mazaheripour H, Ghanbarpour S, Mirmoradi SH, Hosseinpour I. The effect of polypropylene fibers on
the properties of fresh and hardened lightweight self compacting concrete, Construction and Building
Materials, 25(2011) 351-8.
[5] Songa S, Hwang S, Sheu BC. Strength properties of nylon- and polypropylene-fiber reinforced
concretes Cement and Concrete Research, 35(2005) 1546-50.
[6] Jagannadha Rao K, Ahmed Khan T. Suitability of glass fibers in high strength recycled aggregate
concrete – An experimental investigation, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and&
Housing), No. 6, 10(2009) 681-9.
[7] Niranjan K, Pallavi H J, Dr. D.L Venkatesh Babu, Nagaraj V.K, “An Experimental Study On Steel And
Glass Fibre Reinforced Geo-Polymer Concrete Using Ggbs And Alcco Fine”, International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Vol. 03 Issue: 06 , June-2016.
[8] Sathish Kumar. V , Blessen Skariah Thomas , Alex Christopher, “An Experimental Study On The
Properties Of Glass Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering
Research and Applications (IJERA), Vol. 2, Issue 6, November- December 2012, pp.722-726.
[9] Kothapalli Sindhu Rani , N.D Anusha, “Experimental Study Of Geopolymer Concrete By Using Glass
Fibers”, International journal of professional engineering studies, volume viii, issue 1, Dec 2016.
[10] Dr.Vaishali, G Ghorpade, “ Experimental Evaluation of Glass Fibre reinforced Geopolymer Concrete
(GFGPC)”, International Journal of Technical Innovation in Modern Engineering & Science, Volume
3, Issue 11, November-2017.
[11] Mr. Kakade V.D.1 , Dr. Kawade U. R, “ Review On-Glass Fiber Geopolymer Concrete ”, IJARIIE,
Vol-4 Issue-6 2018.
[12] Chintan Khatri , Jenish M Mistry , Anuj K Chandiwala, “An Experimental Study On Rice Husk Ash
And Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete ”, International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research
Development, Volume 2,Issue 12,December -2015.
JASC: Journal of Applied Science and Computations
Volume VI, Issue V, May/2019
ISSN NO: 1076-5131
Page No:141