exp cell res- hansen

Upload: caseosman

Post on 03-Jun-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    1/10

    EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH 192,587-596 (1991)

    Differential Regulation of HSC70, HSP70, HSPSOcw, nd HSPSOP mRNA

    Expression by Mitogen Activation and Heat Shock in Human Lymphocytes

    LINDA K. HANSEN,~ J. P. HOUCHINS,? AND JAMES J. OLEARY*

    Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and tlmmunobiology Research Center, Box 198 UMHC,

    IJniuersity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

    A

    subset

    of heat shock proteins, HSPSOcr, HSPSO@,

    and a member of the HSP70 family, HSC70, shows en-

    hanced synthesis following mitogenic activation as well

    as heat shock in human peripheral blood mononuclear

    cells. In this study, we have examined expression of

    mRNA for these proteins, including the major 70-kDa

    heat shock protein, HSP70, in mononuclear cells follow-

    ing either heat shock or mitogenic activation with phy-

    tohemagglutinin (PHA), ionomycin, and the phorbol es-

    ter, tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate. The results demon-

    strate that the kinetics of mRNA expression of these

    four genes generally parallel the kinetics of enhanced

    protein synthesis seen following either heat shock or

    mitogen activation and provide clear evidence that mi-

    togen-induced synthesis of HSC70 and HSPSO is due to

    increased mRNA levels and not simply to enhanced

    translation of preexisting mRNA. Although most

    previous studies have focused on cell cycle regulation of

    HSP70 mRNA, we found that HSP70 mRNA was only

    slightly and transiently induced by PHA activation,

    while HSC70 is the predominant 70-kDa heat shock

    protein homologue induced by mitogens. Similarly,

    HSPSOa appears more inducible by heat shock than mi-

    togens while the opposite is true for HSP908. These re-

    sults suggest that, although HSP70 and HSC70 have

    been shown to contain similar promoter regions, addi-

    tional regulatory mechanisms which result in differen-

    tial expression to a given stimulus must exist. They

    clearly demonstrate that human lymphocytes are an

    important model system for determining mechanisms

    for regulation of heat shock protein synthesis in un-

    stressed cells. Finally, based on kinetics of mRNA ex-

    pression, the results are consistent with the hypothesis

    that HSC70 and HSPSO gene expression are driven by

    an IL-2/IL-2 receptor-dependent pathway in human T

    cells.

    @ 1991 Academic Press, Inc.

    INTRODUCTION

    Physiologic stress, such as heat shock, preferentially

    enhances the synthesis of a limited number of intracel-

    1 Current address: Department of Surgical Research, The Chil-

    drens Hospital 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.

    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be ad-

    dressed.

    lular proteins (heat shock proteins or HSPS).~ The re-

    sponse has been observed in all cells so far tested and

    some of the HSPs a re highly conserved across species

    (reviewed in [l]). The most strongly heat-inducible and

    conserved HSPs found in eukaryotic cells are proteins

    of about 90 kDa (HSPSO) and 70 kDa (HSP70). How-

    ever, HSPSO is also constitutively expressed in un-

    stressed cells, and all cell types that have been exam-

    ined have constitutively expressed homologues of

    HSP70, including the glucose-reactive protein, GRP76

    in human cells, and a structural and functional homo-

    logue of HSP70, which is less strongly induced by heat

    shock and has been designated HSC70 in human cells.

    HSPSO and these homologues of HSP70 are abundant

    intracellular proteins and it is clear that these proteins

    must have important roles in normal cell function in

    addition to whatever role they may play in cellular adap-

    tation to stress.

    However, while the regulation of HSPSO and HSP70

    synthesis and gene expression by heat shock has been

    well studied, little is known of the regulation of these

    gene products in unstressed cells. We have previously

    reported [2] that mitogen ac tivation of human periph-

    eral blood mononuclear cells in culture results in strong

    and sustained preferential enhancement in the synthe-

    sis of HSPSO and HSC70 during the prereplicative in-

    terval, which is a period of about 24 h following mitogen

    addition but prior to entry of the activated cells into S

    phase. Human HSPSO actually consists of at least two

    proteins, Q and 0, each encoded by its own gene [3] and

    appears to be involved in a number of importan t intra-

    cellular processes in unstressed cells including serving

    as a cytoplasmic shuttle protein for growth-related mac-

    romolecules such as steroid hormone receptors [4] and

    the protooncogene product src-tyrosine kinase [5].

    Compared to human HSP70, HSC70 is only moderately

    heat inducible, but is 83% homologous at the amino acid

    level with HSP70 [6]. In eukaryotes HSC70 appears to

    be involved in a number of intracellular processes im-

    portant for cell growth, such as uncoating of clathrin

    3 Abbreviations used: PHA, phytohemagglutinin; PBLs, peripheral

    blood lymphocytes; HSP, heat-shock protein; IL-2, interleukin-2;

    TPA, tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate.

    587

    0014.4827/91 3.00

    c

    opynght Q 1991 by Academic Press, Inc.

    All rights o f reproduction in any form reserved.

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    2/10

    588

    HANSEN, HOUCHINS, AND OLEARY

    triskelions from endocytotic vesicles [ 71 and transloca-

    tion of nascent polypeptide chains across organelle

    membranes [8, 91.

    The enhanced expression of HSC70 and HSPSO ob-

    served after mitogen activation of human lymphocytes

    shows marked differences from the enhanced expres-

    sion of these gene products associated with the heat

    shock response. Heat shock of human cells in culture

    leads to enhanced expression of HSP70 and HSPSO

    mRN A and enhanced synthesis of the proteins which

    can be detected within 15-30 min of the heat shock [3,

    lo]. However, after stimulation of human peripheral

    blood lymphocytes with the mitogen phytohemagglu-

    tinin (PHA), which activates primarily T cells, preferen-

    tial enhancement in HSC70 and HSPSO synthesis does

    not occur until about 8 h following PHA addition reach-

    ing a stable maximum by about 12-18 h of culture with

    PHA [ 111. Unlike the heat shock response, we observed

    no detectab le increase in HSP70 synthesis during the

    prereplicative interval or even as the activated cells be-

    gin to enter S phase. By contrast, a few studies have

    reported enhanced expression of HSP70 in serum-

    stimulated HeLa cells [lo, 121, but the enhancement

    appears less than that which we observed for HSC70

    and HSPSO in lymphocytes and these findings may not

    be relevant for nontransformed cells. Some enhance-

    ment in HSP70 synthesis and mRNA expression has

    been seen in purified T lymphocytes activated with

    PHA [13], but this study did not examine the HSC70

    gene product, and again the enhancement appears small

    compared to that observed for HSPSO and HSC70 in

    PHA-activated mononuclear cells. One problem with

    such studies of mitogen activation in human lympho-

    cytes is that purified T cells lack the accessory cells, i.e.,

    monocytes, required for optimal proliferative response

    [14] and which are present at optimal levels for mito-

    gen-induced proliferation in the mononuclear cell prepa-

    rations used in our previous work [a].

    In fact, serum- or growth factor-induced expression

    of HSC70 mRNA has not been previously examined in

    human cells, although similar genes have been studied

    in Drosophila [15] and rat cells [16] which, like human

    HSC70, are expressed in the absence of heat shock [6,

    111. Studies thus far find evidence only for serum induc-

    tion of the HSPSOcr gene product in transformed human

    cells [ 171. However, it appeared from two-dimensional

    gel electrophoresis in our studies of T cells that both

    HSPSO cu and /3 are mitogen inducible [II]. Thus, the

    goal of the current study was to begin to clarify the

    mechanisms responsible for the marked enhancement

    in HSC70 and HSPSO protein synthesis observed follow-

    ing PHA activation of human mononuclear cells. The

    basic question was whether the enhanced synthesis of

    these proteins reflects enhanced levels of mRNA ex-

    pression, implying growth factor-modulated enhance-

    ment in gene expression, or is primarily due to enhanced

    translation without an increase in steady-s tate mRNA

    levels. In addition, we sought to clarify whether mitogen

    activation might result in some enhancement in HSP70

    mRNA expression as implied by the study of purified T

    cells [13]. The results are consistent with a slight, but

    transient up-regulation of HSP70 mRNA abundance

    during the prereplicative interval of human T cells.

    However, they demonstrate clearly that HSC70 is the

    predominant 70-kDa HSP induced following mitogen

    activation both at the level of mRNA abundance and

    protein synthesis. Because the kinetics of expression of

    HSC70 mRNA are dramatically different from that of

    HSP70 following mitogen activation and heat shock, it

    seems clear that despite great functional similarities the

    genes for these products must contain quite different

    regulatory elements. The results also show some degree

    of differential modulation of HSPSOcu and HSPSOP

    mRNA abundance in heat shock compared to mitogen

    response, but both forms are clearly enhanced in the

    two responses, implying a greater degree of regulatory

    homology at the gene level. More importantly, these re-

    sults are perhaps the strongest support so far reported

    for the hypothesis that HSPSO and HSC70 expression

    can be modulated in unstressed cells by a growth factor-

    mediated pathway [ 181.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Cell isolation and culture. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

    were isolated from healthy donor whole blood by centrifugation on

    H&opaque (Sigma Chemical Co.), washed three times with Hanks

    Balanced Salt Solution (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY), and resus-

    pended at 2-5 X 10s cells/ml in 10% pooled hu man serum and RPM1

    1640 medium (GIBCO). Phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (Wellcome

    Diagnostics) was added at 1 pg/m l where indicated. Ionomyc in was

    used at 5 fig/ml alone or 1 pg/m l when added with tetradecanoyl phor-

    bol acetate (TPA). TPA alone was used at 50 or 100 rig/ml when

    added with ionomycin. Heat stress consisted of incubating cell cul-

    tures in 50.ml tubes in a water bath at 42 or 45C for 30 or 15 min,

    respectively, followed by a recovery period at 37C. For protein label-

    ing, cells were cultured in the presence of [3H]leucine (ICN) at a spe-

    cific activity of 50 Ci/mmol and a dose of 100 &i/ml and [35S]methi-

    onine (ICN) at a specific activity of 344 mCi/mmol and a dose of 50

    pCi/ml.

    cDNA probes. The HSP70 probe was a full-length cDNA con-

    tained in plasmid, pH 2.3, a gracious gift from Dr. Richard Morimoto.

    The HSC70 probe was a 500.bp fragment isolated from X-phage 7,

    also a gift from Dr. Richard Morimoto. This 500.bp fragment was

    derived from the 5 end of the HSC70 coding region, identified by in

    uitro translation of larger cDNA. The HSC70 and HSP70 cDNA

    probes exhibit no cross-reactivity under normal stringency condi-

    tions. The HSPSOtu and B probes were the kind gift of Dr. Eileen

    Hickey and were 900. and 800.bp cDNA fragments, respectively.

    These cDNA probes are also non-cross-reac ting under normal strin-

    gency conditions. The major histocompatibility Class I cDNA probe

    was specific for the human B7 gene.

    Subcellular f ractionation for protein synthesis. After cell culture,

    cells were scraped f rom culture dishes with a rubber policeman and

    washed three times with cold Hanks. The cell pellet was resuspended

    in low detergent lysis buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 150 mM KCl, 8 mM

    MgCl,, 20 mM Tris, 1 mM PMSF, pH 7.5) at a concentration of 10

    &lo6 cells. After a 15.min incubation on ice, the solution was spun

    briefly in a microfuge to pellet nuclei. The supernatant was saved as

    the cytoplasmic fraction.

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    3/10

    MITOGEN- AND HEAT-INDUCED EXPRESSION OF HSP mRNA

    589

    RNA isolation. RNA isolation was performed using a modifica-

    tion of the Chirgwin method 1191. Briefly, after incubation , cells were

    washed two times in cold Hanks, then lysed in 3 ml guanidinium

    thiocyanate solution (4 M guanidinium thiocyanate [Fluka], 25 mM

    sodium citrate, pH 7, 0.5% sarcosyl, 0.1 M 2-merceptoethanol). The

    lysate was passed through a 22-gauge needle 6-10 times and layered

    on a 1.5.m15.7 M CsCl cushion in Beckman polyallomer tubes. This

    preparation was spun at 35,000 rpm for 18 h. The supernatant was

    carefully removed and 100 ~1 TES (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM

    EDTA, 5% sarkosyl) was added to the pellet which was allowed to

    dissolve for 30 min. The buffer was removed and another 100 ~1 was

    added to the tube for 30 min. The resulting 200.~1 sample was read at

    A,,, and A,, to determine concentration and sample purity.

    SDS-polyacrylamide ge:elelectrophoresis. Following cell fraction-

    ation, counts per minute of label incorporated into the cytoplasmic

    fractions were determined by scintillation counting . Equal counts per

    minute of cytoplasmic samples were added to each lane in a given gel

    and separated by SDSPAGE using the method of Laemmli [20].

    Gels were dried on cellophane (Bio-Rad) on plastic frames (Idea Sci-

    entific) and placed on Kodak X-Omat film for autoradiography.

    Probe preparation. The cDNA sequences were cut from the plas-

    mids with the appropriate restriction endonuclease and then electro-

    phoresed in a known quantity on low melting point agarose (BRL)

    gels. The cDNA fragment was excised from the gel, weighed, and

    boiled 10 min. The amount of fragment present was estimated and

    the solution was aliquoted into lo-fig samples and frozen at ~20C.

    To label, aliquots were removed and boiled 2 min. The Multiprime

    labeling kit (Amersham) was used to label the cDNA with [32P]dCTP.

    A specific activity of 1 X lo9 cpmlwg was generally achieved.

    Northern analysis. Northern analysis was performed as described

    by Thomas 1211. Briefly, RNA samples were denatured 15 min at

    60C in a 1X Mops, 50% formamide, 12% formaldehyde solution, and

    then applied to formaldehyde-agarose denaturing gels (16% formalde-

    hyde, 1X Mops, 1.5% agarose [BRL]). RNA ladder (BRL) was used

    for molecular weight determina tions. After electrophoresis, the

    RNA-containing gel was incubated at room temperature in a 0.05 N

    NaOH solution for 30 min, followed with 2~ SSC for 30 min. The

    RNA was transferred from the gel to GeneScreen (DuPont) using the

    capillary blotting technique at least 20 h. The blot was washed briefly

    in 1X SSC and then baked in V~CUOat 80C for 2 h.

    Hybridization was performed as follows: B lots were prehybridized

    in hybridization solution (1 M NaCl, 50% formamide, 15% dextran

    sulfate, 5X Denhardts, and 1% SDS) for at least 4 h at 42C. Labeled

    probe was boiled for 10 min in the presence of depurinated salmon

    sperm DNA and added to the blot at 5 X lo cpm/ml hybridization

    buffer. Hybridization took place at 42C for at least 16 h, after which

    blots were washed two times in 2X SSC at room temperatu re, two

    times in 2X SSC, 1% SDS at 6OC, and two times in 0.2~ SSC, 0.1%

    SDS at room tempera ture. Blots were then resealed in a heat-sealable

    bag with 1X SSC-saturated 3-mm Whatman paper and exposed to

    Kodak X-Omat film with DuPont intensifying screens.

    Blots were stripped by boiling for 2 min in 1% SDS followed by

    cooling for 15 min. This was repeated, and autoradiography was per-

    formed to assure that all the radioactive probe was removed. Blots

    were reprobed as described above.

    RESULTS

    Specific mRN A Induction following PHA Activation

    of

    Human Mononuclear Cells

    In Fig. 1, mRNA levels were compared by Northern

    analysis of human mononuclear cells cultured for

    various times after PHA addition using the cDNA

    probes for HSC70, HSP70, HSPSOa, and HSPSOP de-

    scribed above. cDNA for the major histocompatibility

    HSC70

    HSP9Oa

    Class I

    ,. .-

    -2.6 kb

    -2.5

    -2.7

    -1.6

    FIG. 1. Kinetics of HSP mRNA expression following mitogen ic

    activation of mononuclear cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

    were PHA-activated and cytoplasmic RNA was isolated at the indi-

    cated times following PHA addition. Levels of cellular HSC70,

    HSP70, HSPSOtu, and HSP90fi mRNA were determined using the

    cDNA probes described under Materials and Methods and the results

    shown are for the same blot which was stripped and reprobed with

    each cDNA. The major histocompatibility complex Class I probe was

    used as a control to compare RNA loading in each lane. Molecular

    weights (kilobases) of the bands are indicated to the right.

    Class I gene, which is not mitogen-inducible in human T

    lymphocytes , was used as a control. As shown in Fig. 1,

    HSC70, HSPSOcY, and HSPSOP mRNA are detectable in

    freshly isolated (0 h) cells. Enhanced HSC70, HSP90@,

    and HSPSOB mRNA levels were observed between 4 and

    8 h after PHA addition, increasing out to 24 h. HSP70

    mRNA levels showed a slight enhancement only at 12 h

    of culture, but return to baseline (0 h) levels by 24 h of

    culture.

    mRNA and Protein Induction following Heat Shock

    To determine the kinetics of mRN A induction follow-

    ing heat stress, mononuclear cells were heat shocked at

    42C for 30 min, then returned to 37C (Fig. 2). Samples

    were removed from the 37C water bath at the indicated

    times for total cellular RNA isolation. While HSP70

    mRNA is not detectable in the control cells incubated

    continuously at 37C, immediately following the 30-min

    heat shock a substantial amount of HSP70 mRNA is

    present. E levated, but decreasing, levels are maintained

    through 2 h post heat shock, and by 4 h HSP70 mRNA is

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    4/10

    590

    HANSEN, HOIJCHINS, AND OLEARY

    HSC70

    -2.5

    HSP90a

    -2.95

    HSP90P

    -2.7

    FIG. 2. Kinetics of HSP mRNA expression following heat shock.

    The cells were heat shocked at 42C for 30 min and returned to 37C,

    and total cellular RNA was isolated at the indicated times following

    return to 37C. Northern analysis was performed as in Fig. 1 and the

    results shown are for the same blot which was stripped and reprobed

    with each cDNA. Although the data are not shown, mRNA levels

    detected with the Class I gene probe were not affected by heat shock

    and, relative to the induction seen with the heat shock gene probes,

    reflected only slight differences in loading.

    barely detectable. HSC70 mRNA is detectable in the

    control cells, and slightly enhanced HSC70 mRNA lev-

    els are seen immediately following the 30.min heat

    shock, peaking at 30 min of incubation at 37C, and

    decreasing to resting levels by l-2 h. Like HSC70,

    HSPSOol mRNA is detectable in resting cells and

    slightly enhanced immediately following the heat shock.

    Maximal levels are achieved within 2 h after stress and

    by 4 h, levels have returned to control. HSPSOP mRNA

    shows a similar pattern of response to heat shock, al-

    though maximal levels are seen slightly earlier.

    The kinetics of heat shock-induced cytoplasmic pro-

    tein synthesis are shown in Fig. 3. Following a 30 min

    42C heat shock, the mononuclear cells were returned

    to 37C and pulse labeled with radiolabeled amino acids

    for the indicated intervals. After the labeling period,

    cells were lysed and counts per minute of incorporated

    label determined with equal counts per minute added to

    each lane in the gel, followed by separation on SDS-

    PAGE and autoradiography. As expected with addition

    of equal amounts of label per lane the increases in the

    heat shock bands are accompanied by decreased inten-

    sity of bands corresponding to non-heat shock proteins,

    particularly the major band corresponding to actin at

    about 42 kDa. The exposure time for the autoradiogram

    was adjusted to permit optimal visualization of the rela-

    tive enhancement in heat shock protein synthesis.

    Thus, the control lane is somewhat underexposed (No

    HS).; however, as shown in Fig. 7 and previously [2,11],

    HSP70 synthesis is undetectable in control cells even

    with greater relative exposure of the autorad iograms.

    As shown in Fig. 3, HSP70 synthesis is enhanced within

    the first 30 min following stress. Synthesis reaches a

    peak at l-2 h and returns to control levels by 446 h. By

    contrast, HSC70 synthesis is detectab le in resting con-

    trol cells and is enhanced 30-60 min following stress

    and returns to control levels by 2-3 h. As with HSC70,

    the HSPSO band, composed of both HSPSOtr and

    HSPSOP, is detectably synthesized in resting cells. En-

    hanced synthesis is observed 30-60 min following stress

    with maximal synthesis seen at l-2 h. Baseline levels

    are achieved by 4-6 h. Thus, the heat-induced enhance-

    ment in protein synthesis parallels increases in specific

    mRN A levels, although as expected the kinetics are

    somewhat delayed.

    Comparison of mRNA Induction following Heat Shock

    and Mitogen Activation

    The degree of specific mR NA induction following

    heat stress or mitogen activation is compared in Fig. 4,

    HSPSO-

    HSC70-

    HSP70

    FIG. 3. Kinetics of protein synthesis in mononuc lear cells follow-

    ing heat shock. Cells were heat shocked at 42C for 30 min, then

    returned to 37C, and incubated with [3H]leucine and [%]methio-

    nine for the indicated intervals prior to cell fractionation. Equal

    counts per minute of incorporated label were loaded in each lane with

    proteins separated by SDSPAGE followed by autoradiography. The

    autoradiograph is shown. Molecular weight markers (kDa) are indi-

    cated to the right and the positions of HSPSO (LYand B forms are not

    distinguishable), HSC70, and HSP70 as shown in previous studies [2,

    111 are indicated to the left.

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    5/10

    MITOGEN- AND HEAT-INDUCED EXPRESSION OF HSP mRNA

    591

    HSP70

    -2.6 kb

    HSP90a

    HSPJN)P

    -2.7

    FIG. 4. Comparison of heat shock-induced and mitogen-induced

    levels of HSP mRNA in mononuc lear cells. The cells were heat

    shocked at 42C for 30 min or 45C for 15 min, and then placed at

    37C for 1 h at which time total cellular RNA was isolated. In addi-

    tion, RNA was isolated from lymphocytes which were incubated with

    PHA for 1 2, 24, or 48 h. The results show a single blot which was

    stripped and reprobed with each cDNA. Although not shown, varia-

    tions in loading detected with the Class I gene probe were insignifi-

    cant compared to the differences seen with the other probes.

    which shows mitogen induction of HSP mRNA and the

    induction of HSP mRNA after a 42 and 45C heat shock

    with RNA isolated 1 h after the heat stress. In addition,

    mRNA expression was examined out to 48 h after PHA

    activation to see if the enhanced message levels are sus-

    tained later in the cell cycle or only transiently ex-

    pressed during the prereplicative, GO-S phase, transi-

    tion. As shown previously [22], by 48 h following PHA

    addition, most responding T lymphocytes have com-

    pleted at least one round of division and are progressing

    through the cell cycle with increasing asynchrony.

    HSP70 mRNA is, as expected from the previous re-

    sults, undetectable in resting cells. Heat stress at 42C

    enhances abundant HSP70 mRNA, with even greater

    enhancement at 45C. Consistent with Fig. 1, a very

    faint HSP70 band is detectable at 12 h following PHA

    activation, with the mRNA diminishing to undetectable

    levels by 48 h. Again consistent with the previous re-

    sults, HSC70 m RNA is detectable in resting cells and

    less strongly induced than HSP70 mRNA by 42C heat

    shock; however, the mRNA is strongly enhanced at

    45C. PHA induced HSC70 levels at 12 h are signifi-

    cantly enhanced over that seen in control (37C) cells or

    42C heat-stressed cells. This increase in HSC70

    mRNA is maintained out to 24 h, but is diminished at 48

    h. The heat shock induction of HSC70 mRNA is compa-

    rable to mitogen-induced levels only at the higher heat

    shock temperature.

    HSPSOn mRNA is detectab le in a very low quantity in

    resting cells, and shows a lo- and 20-fold increase with

    42 and 45C heat stress, respectively. After PHA addi-

    tion, mRNA expression continues to increase out to 48

    h. The level of 42C heat shock-induced mRNA is about

    equivalent to that seen at 24 h after PHA addition, but

    the amount of mRNA induced by severe heat shock ex-

    ceeds that seen at any time point following mitogen ac-

    tivation. HSP908 mRNA is also low in resting cells and

    increases in response to heat stress, but its extent of

    induction by heat stress is lower relative to that induced

    by mitogen. Like HSPSOcu, mitogen-enhanced mRNA

    levels persist at least 48 h following stimulation. Thus,

    HSPSOcu appears to be more inducible by heat stress

    than by mitogen, whereas HSPSOP shows greater mito-

    gen enhancement.

    Cytoplasm ic protein synthesis induced by different

    degrees of heat stress is shown in Fig. 5. As in Fig. 3,

    equal counts of incorporated label were added to each

    lane. Prior to cell fractionation, aliquots of cells were

    heat shocked followed by incubation with radiolabeled

    amino acids for 2 h at 37C or the radiolabeled amino

    acids were added and the cells were left at the heat

    shock temperature for the 2-h labeling period. The 30-

    min 42C heat stress followed by 37C recovery shows

    the expected pattern of protein synthesis, with HSP70

    showing greatest induction, along with HSPSO, HSC70,

    and other minor heat shock proteins. A 2-h continuous

    incubation at 42C shows essentially the same pattern.

    In contrast, the 15-min 45C stress induces HSP70 and

    HSC70 as expected, but the quantity of HSPSO protein

    is diminished relative to that seen with the heat shock at

    the lower temperature. Continuous incubation for 2 h at

    45C inhibited any detectab le incorporation of radiola-

    beled amino acids into proteins.

    The HSP protein synthesis observed following the

    15-min 45C heat shock stands in contrast to the

    marked enhancement in mRNA levels observed with

    this stress compared to the mRNA levels observed with

    heat shock at 42C. Thus, while HSPSO mRNA levels

    were more strongly induced by the 15.min 45C heat

    shock, HSPSO protein synthesis declined, and HSP70

    and HSC70 show about the same degree of enhanced

    protein synthesis at 45C despite a marked increase in

    mRN A levels with this heat shock condition.

    Effects of Phorbol Ester and Ionomycin on HSP

    Induction in Mononuclear Cells

    Certain agents in addition to PHA can be mitogenic

    for lymphocytes. Ionomycin, a calcium ionophore, and

    TPA, a phorbol ester, can induce a partial mitogenic

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    6/10

    592

    HANSEN, HOUCHINS, AND OLEARY

    205kd

    -116

    96

    66

    -45

    -29

    FIG. 5. Protein synthesis following heat shock at different tem-

    peratures. Mononuclear cells were heat shocked at 42C for 30 min or

    45C for 15 min, and [H]leucine and [?S]methionine were added to

    the culture medium. The cells were then either returned to 37C or

    maintained at the heat shock temperature for the labeling interval.

    The cells were then lysed and equal counts of incorporated label were

    added per lane and separated by SDSPAGE followed by autoradiog-

    raphy. The autoradiograph is shown: No heat shock, 37C for 2 h;

    42C for 30 min, 37 for 2 h; 42C for 2.5 h; 45C for 15 min, 37C for 2

    h: 45C for 2.25 h.

    response alone or in combination by increasing intra-

    cellular free calcium and activating protein kinase C,

    respectively. mRNA induction by these agents was ex-

    amined and compared to levels in resting cells and cells

    activated by PHA, using concentrations of TPA (50 ng/

    ml) and ionomycin (5 pg/ml) that separately induced

    the greatest proliferative response, which was about 20-

    25% of that seen with PHA. The optimal concentrations

    when used together were 100 rig/ml and 1 pg/ml, respec-

    tively, and this combination induced a proliferative re-

    sponse about

    55%

    of the optimal PHA-induced re-

    sponse (data not shown).

    In these experiments, the cells were incubated with

    the same concentrations of mitogens for 24 h in the pres-

    ence or absence of serum, a required cofactor for the

    proliferative response. In the presence of serum, HSP70

    mRNA appears to show some slight enhancement in the

    TPA- and PHA-activated cells (Fig. 6). In contrast,

    HSC70 shows a similar, 5- to lo-fold induction, by iono-

    mycin, TPA, or PHA, and both HSPSOo( and HSP90/3

    also show strong induction with all treatments. The

    pattern of protein induction in the presence of serum is

    also similar with each stimulus (Fig. 7). As in Figs. 3 and

    5, equal counts per minute of label incorporated into the

    cytoplasmic factions was added per lane. Consistent

    with our previous reports [2,11] the induction of HSC70

    and HSPSO by PHA is not as striking as the relative

    induction seen following heat shock . However, the pref-

    erential enhancement with PHA activation occurs

    against a general increase in protein synthesis during

    the prereplicative interval, and synthesis of these pro-

    teins accounts for more than 5% of the total protein

    synthesized during this interval [2]. PHA added in the

    absence of serum, although nonmitogenic [2], is suffi-

    cient to induce the synthesis of both HSC70 and

    HSPSO, while serum alone elicits no induction. TPA,

    like PHA, is able to induce this set of proteins in both

    the presence and the absence of serum as does the com-

    bination of ionomycin and TPA. By contrast, ionomycin

    added in the absence of serum gives a very different

    pattern of protein synthesis with strong induction of a

    band with molecular weight similar to another member

    of the HSP70 family, BiP, or GRP76, which has been

    shown to be induced by calcium ionophores in another

    cell type [23]. However, the preferentially enhanced syn-

    E g

    2

    %

    = c

    2 .P c .,

    f

    HSP70

    -2.6 kb

    HSC70

    -2.5

    HSP90u

    HSP90P

    -2.7

    FIG. 6. HSP mRNA induction by ionomycin and phorbol ester.

    Mononuclear cells were incubated in medium and 10% serum alone

    (lane marked serum) or with ionomycin (5 pg/ml), TPA (50 rig/ml),

    ionomycin (1 rg/ml) plus TPA (100 rig/ml), or PHA (1 Kg/ml). After

    incubation for 18 h, total cellular RNA was isolated and Northern

    analysis was performed. One blot was stripped and reprobed with

    each cDNA. The Class I probe (data not shown) again revealed only

    small differences in gel loading.

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    7/10

    MITOGEN- AND HEAT-INDUCED EXPRESSION OF HSP mRNA

    593

    -205kd

    HSPSO-

    HSC70-

    FIG. 7. Protein synthesis induced by ionomycin and phorhol es-

    ter. Mononuclear cells were placed in medium alone or medium p lus

    10% serum and incubated with the indicated agents at concentrations

    which gave the optimal proliferative responses, as described in the

    text. lonomycin (i) was added at 5 pg/ml; TPA was added at 50

    rig/ml; and when added together, the concentrations were 1 pg/ml

    and 100 rig/ml, respectively, and PHA was used at 1 pg/ml. The cul-

    tures containing serum are noted by +s. and serum = control

    with no mitogens. The remaining cultures contained medium alone

    with no serum added. Af ter 18 h in culture, cells were lysed and equal

    counts from the cytoplasmic fractions were run on SDS-PAGE, fol-

    lowed by autoradiography. The autoradiograph is shown.

    thesis seen in Fig. 7 is clearly associated with a general

    decrease in synthesis of most of the major bands seen in

    the control lanes or in the lane with ionomycin in the

    presence of serum. More severe forms of stress, e.g., the

    more severe examples of heat shock shown in Fig. 5, also

    induce a general suppression in protein synthesis and

    thus, it seems likely that this result represen ts a toxic

    effect due to an excessive free concentration of ionomy-

    tin in serum-free medium which lacks serum proteins

    which can bind this hydrophobic compound.

    DISCUSSION

    This paper is the first report to our knowledge to ex-

    amine mitogen-induced HSC70, HSPSOcu, and HSPSOP

    mRNA expression in human lymphocytes presented

    with optimal conditions for cell growth and prolifera-

    tion. The results show that HSC70 and HSP90a and /3

    mRN A are significantly enhanced by mitogen activa-

    tion in human periphera l blood mononuclear cells (Fig.

    1). These enhanced mRNA levels correlate with the ki-

    netics of enhanced HSC70 and HSPSO synthesis ob-

    served following PHA activation (Fig. 7 and [2, 111). As

    noted under Results, the preferential enhancement in

    synthesis of the heat shock proteins appears more strik-

    ing following heat shock (Figs. 3 and 5), but in part this

    is due to the lower general level of protein synthesis in

    quiescent cells which forms the background against

    which this enhancement is visualized. Nevertheless,

    with the major exception of the results following a brief

    45C heat shock (F igs. 4 and 5), where protein synthesis

    is not further enhanced (HSC70, HSP70) or declines

    (HSPSO) despite greatly increased mRNA abundance,

    differences in kinetics of protein synthesis with heat

    shock are also generally mirrored by differences in ex-

    pression at the level of mRNA. Taken together, these

    results indicate that the preferentially enhanced pro-

    tein synthesis is not simply due to enhanced transla-

    tional activity of preexisting mRNA in mitogen-acti-

    vated or heat-shocked mononuclear cells.

    For HSC70 and HSPSO, enhanced mRNA levels were

    observed within 8 h following mitogenic activation and

    were sustained out to 24 h, which is just prior to entry

    into S phase [22], and the increased levels are main-

    tained beyond this prereplicative interval. By contrast,

    HSP70 mRNA is only transiently increased at about 12

    h after PHA addition. As expected, heat shock-induced

    mRNA expression was seen for all four genes examined,

    but unlike the PHA response enhanced expression is

    sustained only 2-4 h following heat shock (Fig. 2). Thus,

    even though HSP70 and HSC70 show 75% homology at

    the DNA level and contain similar promoter regions

    (See below and [6]), they exhibit very different kinetics

    of expression to either stimulus.

    Peripheral blood mononuclear cells consist of approx-

    imately 5% monocytes, 10% B lymphocytes, and 85% T

    lymphocytes, and the majority of the lymphocytes are in

    a natural GO, or resting, stage of the cell cycle. Activa-

    tion of the T cells by a mitogen like PHA in the presence

    of adequate numbers of accessory cells initiates a com-

    plex sequence of events as the cells progress through the

    prereplicative interval. Perhaps the most well-charac-

    terized events involve synthesis of the T-cell growth

    factor, IL-2, and expression of IL-2 receptors on T cells.

    Within 2-6 h after activation, CD4+ helper T lympho-

    cytes in the presence of accessory cells begin to synthe-

    size and secrete IL-2 and both the CD4+ and the CD8+

    (cytotoxic/suppressor) T cells begin to express IL-2 re-

    ceptors [24]. IL-2 then acts as a growth factor required

    for lymphocyte progression from Gl into S phase [24,

    251. As shown here, expression of HSC70 and HSPSO

    mRNA appears to be up-regulated subsequent to this

    initial increase in IL-2 and IL-2 receptor expression

    (Fig. 1). Thus, the kinetics of enhanced HSC70 and

    HSPSO expression are consistent with enhancement fol-

    lowing IL-2/IL-2 receptor interaction.

    This conclusion is also supported by the results of

    Ferris

    et

    al. [ 131 using purified human T cells. As noted

    above, isolated T cells lack the accessory cells which are

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    8/10

    594

    HANSEN, HOUCHINS. AND OLEARY

    required for IL-2 synthesis [ 141, and it is not surprising

    that neither sustained synthesis of HSPSO nor induc-

    tion of HSP7O mRNA was seen in primary response to

    PHA by these investigators. Some increase in HSP70

    protein synthesis was observed in response to PHA, but

    they found no induction of HSP70 mRNA by PHA or

    phorbol12-myristate 13-acetate. HSPSOprotein synthe-

    sis (the (Yand /3 orms were not distinguished) was found

    to be rapidly and transiently induced by PHA with ki-

    netics of expression different from HSP70. However,

    while IL-2 synthesis requires accessory cells, PHA can

    induce IL-2 receptor expression in T cells depleted of

    monocytes [22]. When IL-2 was added subsequent to

    PHA addition, Ferris et al. [ 131 observed some enhanced

    HSP70 mRNA and protein expression and a sustained

    induction of HSPSO synthesis, similar to the kinetics of

    HSPSO synthesis we have observed in PHA activated

    mononuclear cells [ 111. Although HSC70 induction was

    not examined by Ferris et al. [ 131, these results clearly

    support the hypothesis that HSC70 and HSPSO synthe-

    sis in T cells is driven by the IL-2/IL-2 receptor interac-

    tion.

    In contrast to these results with purified T cells, we

    have been unable to demonstrate any increases in

    HSP70 protein synthesis following PHA activation of

    the T cells present in human mononuclear cells [2, 111.

    All that we have been able to observe for HSP70 per se is

    the very transient increase in mRN A levels at about 12

    h after PHA addition shown in the current study (Fig.

    1). In fact, Kaczmarek et al. [26] and Ida and Yahara

    [27] demonstrated diminished HSP70 mRNA and pro-

    tein expression, respectively, in PHA-activated lym-

    phocytes. The different results observed in these studies

    may be due at least in part to the existence of up to 10

    genes in the HSP70 family [28] and lack of standardized

    nomenclature or use of different gene probes for HSP70

    may explain some of these apparently conflicting re-

    sults. However, taken together it seems clear that

    HSP70 synthesis and mRNA expression is only weakly

    inducible by T-lymphocyte mitogens, and the constuiti-

    vely synthesized homologue, HSC70, is the predomi-

    nant form induced in this growth factor response.

    HSP70 and HSPSO expression have also been exam-

    ined in the growth response of other cell types. HSP70

    and HSPSOcY mRNA expression have been shown to be

    enhanced in HeLa cells following serum addition [lo,

    121. c-myc can also induce HSP70 expression in mam-

    malian cells [29] and Ela adenov irus infection, which

    leads to increased expression of cellular gene products

    involved in cell growth, has been reported to induce ex-

    pression of HSP70 and HSPSOa, but not HSPSOP, in

    HeLa cells [3, 171. On the other hand, Kao et al. [30]

    report an increase in HSP70 protein synthesis following

    S phase in HeLa cells rather than in the Gl interval

    following serum addition. Regard less of this apparent

    conflict, most studies with other human-derived cells

    have focused on expression in transformed cell lines.

    Such cell lines exhibit proliferation that is relatively in-

    dependent of growth factors and serum deprivation gen-

    erally does not lead to growth arrest in a true GO state.

    Thus, responses of growth-arrested transformed cells to

    serum addition may not accurately reflect the effects of

    serum or growth factor addition on cell cycle progres-

    sion in nontrans formed cell types.

    By contrast, it is clear from the current results that

    up-regulation of HSC70 and the HSPSO genes is part of

    the sequence of events involved in the prereplicative

    interval of human T cells and these findings suggest

    that similar modulation may be a common feature of the

    growth factor response of other nontransformed human

    cell types. Unlike the studies of transformed cells, again

    there is not much evidence for modulation of HSP70

    levels during the proliferative cycle of T cells and, while

    some studies have reported serum induction of

    HSPSOa, but not HSPSOP, in HeLa cells [3, 171, our

    results indicate that both the (Y and the /3 forms are mi-

    togen inducible and in fact, HSPSOP mRNA exhibits

    greater PHA-stimulated induction, relative to induction

    by heat shock, than HSPSOn mRNA (Fig. 6).

    HSC70, HSP70, HSPSOcu, and HSPSOB mRNA were

    also induced by ionomycin and TPA in the current

    study, both of which are only partial mitogens for pe-

    ripheral blood lymphocytes [31]. Calcium ionophores

    such as ionomycin or A23187 induce the release of in-

    tracellular calcium stores, one of the events in the mito-

    genie pathway. On the other hand, the phorbol esters,

    such as TPA, activate protein kinase C [25]. In the

    current results, ionomycin at an optimal concentration

    induced a proliferative response that was 26% of that

    with PHA, while TPA gave a 20% response, and with

    both reagents the response was only 55% of that seen

    with optimal PHA dose (data not shown). Although

    these agents elicited only a partial mitogenic response

    compared to PHA, both ionomycin and TPA induced

    expression of the same set of heat shock mRNA seen

    with PHA and expression was enhanced to about the

    same extent with each stimulus (Fig. 6). An intriguing

    finding was that enhanced synthesis of these proteins

    by PHA and TPA does not require the presence of

    serum in the culture medium. As shown previously [ll],

    serum alone does not affect HSP synthesis, and serum

    supplies transferrin, a required cofactor for T-cell prolif-

    erative response. Thus, these results demonstrate that

    induction of the heat shock gene products by PHA or

    TPA in the absence of serum is not by itself sufficient to

    induce the cells to enter the cell cycle. By contrast, iono-

    mycin in the absence of serum induced the synthesis of a

    protein with a molecular weight similar to that expected

    for the glucose reactive HSP70 homologue, BiP or

    GRP76, which has been shown to be induced by iono-

    mycin in another cell type [23]. As noted under Results,

    however, the enhanced synthesis of this protein was ac-

    companied by marked suppression of other synthesized

    bands, suggesting that in the absence of serum binding

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    9/10

    MITOGEN- AND HEAT-INDUCED EXPRESSION OF HSP mRNA

    595

    proteins the cells were subjec t to excessive concentra-

    tions or the drug. Thus, it seem s likely that the appar-

    ently enhanced synthesis of GRP76 in this experiment

    may be an artifact of cell injury rather than due to spe-

    cific induction of this gene product.

    There is growing evidence for at least two distinct

    promoters in the 5 untranslated region of some HSP70

    genes which is consistent with the hypothesis that gene

    activity may be modulated by growth factor ac tivation.

    All heat shock genes contain a highly conserved heat

    shock consensus element (HSE) which is responsible

    for heat shock induction, and an additional region has

    been identified as the serum-responsive element in the

    HSP70 gene of HeLa cells along with a CCAAT box

    which has been observed in a number of eukaryotic

    other gene promoters [32, 331. An HSE and a CCAAT

    box have also been identified in the 5 untranslated re-

    gion of the human HSC70 [6]. Despite these indications

    that HSC70 and HSP70 may have similar promotor re-

    gions, as shown in the current study the kinetics and

    levels of expression differ dramatically in response to

    heat shock or PHA in human lymphocytes. Thus, there

    must exist additional regulatory elements which are re-

    sponsible for this differential expression, such as, as yet

    undefined differences in the promotor regions, trans-

    acting enhancer elements, or differences in mRNA sta-

    bility. The existence of possible growth factor-respon-

    sive promotors in the HSPSO genes has yet to be deter-

    mined, but based on the current results it seems clear

    that similar non-HSE promotor regions must be pres-

    ent to explain the very significant and sustained in-

    creases in HSPSO mRNA expression we observe, and

    again additional regulatory elements must be involved

    to explain the differential enhancement in HSPSOa and

    HSPSOP mRNA, following mitogen activation and heat

    shock.

    Only two instances were observed in this study where

    protein expression does not parallel mRNA expression

    and which might indicate control of HSP synthesis at

    some level other than mRNA abundance. First, in com-

    paring mild (42C) to severe (45C) heat stress, mRNA

    expression increases dramatically for each gene at the

    higher temperature (Fig. 4), but protein synthesis is not

    enhanced or diminished (Fig. 5). Similar to these re-

    sults, the 90-kDa heat shock protein expressed in HeLa

    cells is synthesized at 42C but not 45C [34]. It has

    been proposed that one of the toxic effects of severe

    heat stress is inhibition of mRNA translation [35]. On

    the other hand, it has been reported that at tempera-

    tures greater than 42.5C, mammalian cells are unable

    to splice introns from unprocessed messages [36]. Be-

    cause the HSP70 gene contains no introns, and introns

    are present in HSC70 and both HSPSO genes [6,12,37],

    it is possible that the diminished HSC70 and HSPSO

    synthesis we observed at the higher heat shock tempera-

    ture could be accounted for by this mechanism. How-

    ever, our Northern blots do not show evidence for un-

    processed message after the 45C heat shock and in fact

    show enhanced levels of what appears to be mature

    mRNA. Alternatively, studies of RNA metabolism fol-

    lowing heat stress indicate that the processing and

    transport to the cytoplasm of non-heat shock message

    appears to be inhibited, while the transcription of these

    genes remains unaffected [38]. As in our study, how-

    ever, the accumulation of heat shock mRNA is ob-

    served, and it has been postulated that heat shock

    mRNA may represent a class of mRNA which main-

    tains normal p rocessing during stress [38]. Thus, our

    results are not consistent with inhibition of HSP pro-

    tein synthesis due to inhibition of splicing or mRNA

    transport and processing following severe heat shock

    and the most likely mechanism leading to diminished

    protein synthesis following severe heat shock in lym-

    phocytes is direct inhibition of mRNA translation.

    The second instance in which protein synthesis does

    not parallel mRNA expression is in the later stages of

    mitogen activation. Previous work has shown sustained

    synthesis of HSC70 and HSPSO gene products as late as

    48 h following PHA addition [ll]. However, HSC70

    mRNA is diminished by 48 h after PHA addition, while

    HSPSOa and fi mRNA remain enhanced at this time

    point (Fig. 4). Thus, enhanced HSC70 m RNA transla-

    tion or some other regulatory process may be required

    to sustain HSC70 synthesis at later times and this result

    indicates that there may be a separate down-regulatory

    signal which operates on HSC70, but not HSPSOol or p,

    during S phase.

    We thank Drs. Richard Morimoto and Eileen Hickey for providing

    us with cDNA probes, and Dr. Helen Hallgren for critical review of

    the manuscript. This work was supported

    by

    NIH Grants AG 02338

    and CA 39692 to James J. OLeary and a grant from the University of

    Minnesota Graduate School to Linda K. Hansen. Portions of this

    manuscript will be a part of the doctoral thesis of Linda K. Hansen to

    fulfill the requirements of the University of Minnesota Graduate

    School.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    I.

    8.

    9.

    Lindquist,S.

    (1986)

    Annu.

    Reu.Biochem. 55,1151~1191.

    Haire, R. N., Peterson, M. S., and OLeary, J. J. (1988a) J. Cell

    Biol. 106,883-891.

    Hickey, E., Brandon, S. E., Sadis, S. Smale, G., and Weber, L. A.

    (1986)Gene 43,147-154.

    Catelli, M. G., Binart, N., Jung-Testas, I., Renoir, J. M., Baulieu,

    E. E., Feramisco, J. R., and Welch, W. J. (1985) EMBO J. 4,

    3131-3135.

    Opperman, H., Levinson, W., and Bishop, J. M. (1981) Proc.

    Natl. Acad. Ski. 1JSA 78, 1067-1071.

    Dworniczak, B., and Mirault, M-E. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15,

    5181-5197.

    Ungewickel, E. (1985) EMBO J. 4,

    3385-3391.

    Deshaies, R. J., Koch, B. D., Werner-Washburne, M., Craig,

    E. A., and Schekman, R. (1988) Nature (London,J 332,800-805.

    Chirico, W. J., Waters, M. G., and Blobel, G. (1988) Nature (Low

    don) 332.805~810.

  • 8/11/2019 Exp Cell Res- Hansen

    10/10

    596

    HANSEN, HOUCHINS, AND OLEARY

    10.

    11.

    12.

    13.

    14.

    15.

    16.

    17.

    18.

    19.

    20.

    21.

    22.

    23.

    Wu, B. J., and Morimoto, R. I. (1985) Iroc. N&l. Acad. Sci. USA

    82, 6070-6074.

    Haire, R. N., and OLeary, ,J. J. (1988h) Exp. Cell Rex 179 , 65-

    78.

    Hickey, E., Brandon, S. E., Smale, (i., I,loyd, D., and Weher,

    L. A. (1989) Mol. Cell. Viol. 9, 2615-2626.

    Ferris, D. K., Harel-Bellan, A., Morimoto, R. I., Welch, W. J..

    and Farrar, W. L. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Ski. 1lSA 85, 3850-

    3854.

    Chalita, T. A., Schwartz, D. H., Miller, R., and Geha, R. S. (1987)

    Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 44, 235-247.

    Ingolia, T. D., and Craig, E. A. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. lfSA

    79, 5255529.

    OMalley, K. O., Mauron, A., Barchas, J. D., and Kedes, I,.

    (1985) Mol. Cell. Riol. 5, 3476-3483.

    Simon, M. C., Kitchner, K., Kao, H-T., Hickey, E., Weller, I,.,

    Voellmy, R., Heintz, N., and Nevins, J. R. (1987) Mol. Ccl/. Rio/.

    7, 2884-2890.

    Pledger, W. J., Stiles, C. D., Antoniades, H. N., and Scher, C. D.

    (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. liSA 75, 2839-2843.

    Chirgwin, J. M., Przyhyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter,

    W. J. (1979) Biochemistry

    18, 5294-5299.

    Laemmli, 17. K. (1970) Nature (London) 277, 680-685.

    Thomas, P. (1980) t-roc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1iSA 77, 5201b5205.

    OLeary, J. J., Hanrahan, 1,. R., Mehta, C., and Rosenherg, A.

    (1980) Cell Tissue Kinet. 13, 41-51.

    Resendez, E., Jr., Attenello, J. W., Grafsky, A., Chang, C. S., and

    Lee, A. S. (1985) Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 1212-1219.

    24.

    25.

    26.

    27.

    28.

    29.

    30.

    31.

    32.

    :x1.

    :34.

    35.

    36.

    37.

    38.

    Reed, J. C., Alpers, J. D., Nowell, P. C., and Hoover, R. G. (1986)

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (ISA 83, 3982-3986.

    Isakov, N., Scholz, W., and Altman, A. (1986) Immunol. Today

    7, 271-277.

    Kaczmarek, I,., Calabretta, B., Kao, H-T., Heintz, N., Nevins, J.,

    and Baserga, R. (1987) J. Cell Biol.

    10,4, 183-187.

    Iida, H. and Yahara, I. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 199-207.

    Mues, (;. I., Munn, T. Z., and Raese, J. D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem.

    261,874-877.

    Kingston, R. E., Baldwin, A. S., and Sharp, P . A. (1984) Nature

    (London) 3

    12,280-282.

    Kao, H-T., Capasso. O ., Heintz, N., and Nevins, J. R. (1985)

    Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 628-633.

    Domenico, D., Greaves, M., Villa, S., and DeBraud, F. (1984)

    Eur. J. Immunol. 14, 720-724.

    Wu, B. ,J., Kingston, R. E., and Morimoto, R. I. (1986) Proc.

    Nntl. Acad. Sci. [IsA 83, 629-633.

    Morgan, W. D.. Williams, G. T., Morimoto, R. I., Greene, J.,

    Kingston, R. E., and Tjian, R. (1987) Mol. (ell. Biol. 7, 1129-

    1 1:%x

    Hatayama, T., Honda, K-I., and Yukioka, M. (1986) Biochem.

    Hiophys. RPS. Commun. 137, 957-963.

    Welch, W. J.. and Mizzen, 1,. A. (1988) J. ((~11Hiol. 106, 1117-

    11:io.

    Yost, H. J., and I,indquist, S. (1986) (~11 45, 185-193.

    Rebhe, N. F., Ware, ,J., Bertine, R. M., Modrick, P., and Stafford,

    D. W. (1985) (;ene 53, 235-245.

    Sadis, S.. Hickey, E., and Weher, L. A. (1988) J. C&I. Ph.y.siol.

    135, 377-386.

    Received July 2, 1990

    Revised version received September 24, 1990