exelon presentation oct 2011 bathymetry study
TRANSCRIPT
Sediment Task Force MeetingJanuary 23, 2012
Marjorie L. Zeff, PhD., PG (URS)Gary Lemay (Gomez & Sullivan)
Conowingo Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 405)
CONOWINGO POND BATHYMETRIC SURVEY
SURVEY OBJECTIVES Create a thorough bed elevation map of Conowingo Pond
Determine where and to what extent Conowingo Pond’s sediment/bathymetric profile has changed since the 2008 USGS survey
Establish a physical “baseline” benchmark to better inform future sediment management decisions
WORK CONDUCTED
Collected bathymetric and water velocity data in Conowingo Pond Week of October 24, 2011 (< 6 weeks after flows receded from Tropical Storm Lee)
26 previously surveyed USGS transect locations
33 additional transects, 5 longitudinal profiles
Conducted QAQC on collected data
Plotted 2011 data against 2008 data for each transect
Calculated and compared 2008 vs. 2011 average depths, sediment volume/load
Provided data (along with other sources) to USACE for use in the sediment model
2
3
2011 Transect Layout
CONOWINGO POND BATHYMETRIC SURVEY
FINDINGS
USGS XC 19 and upstream are likely in dynamic equilibrium Some areas of deposition and scour, but generally balanced
In the lower Pond (USGS XC 20 and below), deposition outweighed scour Average cross-section depths generally decreased by 1 foot to 3.5 feet
Deposition occurred around banks/edges, scour in the main channel
The river thalweg appeared to shift toward the dam’s spillway in the farthest downstream cross-sections
Conowingo Pond accumulated approximately 5,870 acre-ft of sediment between the 2008 survey (fall 2008) and 2011 survey (late October 2011)
Net sediment deposition between the 2008 and 2011 surveys was 8.67 million tons, which translates to approximately 2.9 million tons of deposition per year
For reference, historic deposition rates have ranged from 3.1 million tons/yr from 1929-1958, to 2.5 million tons/yr from 1958-1993, to 1.5 million tons/yr from 1996-2008 (Langland 2009)
4
5
Upper Pond
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000
Bed
Elev
ation
(ft N
GVD
1929
)
Distance from Left [West] Bank (ft)
2008-2011 Cross-Section Comparison - Looking Downstream
Data:GSE 2011. GSE XC3,USGS XC2Data:USGS 2008. GSE XC3,USGS XC2
6
Middle Pond
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
Bed
Elev
ation
(ft N
GVD
192
9)
Distance from Left [West] Bank (ft)
2008-2011 Cross-Section Comparison - Looking Downstream
Data:GSE 2011. GSE XC31,USGS XC15Data:USGS 2008. GSE XC31,USGS XC15
7
Lower Pond
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000
Bed
Elev
ation
(ft N
GVD
192
9)
Distance from Left [West] Bank (ft)
2008-2011 Cross-Section Comparison - Looking Downstream
Data:GSE 2011. GSE XC41,USGS XC20Data:USGS 2008. GSE XC41,USGS XC20
8
Channel Shift Close to Dam
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000
Bed
Elev
ation
(ft N
GVD
192
9)
Distance from Left [West] Bank (ft)
2008-2011 Cross-Section Comparison - Looking Downstream
Data:GSE 2011. GSE XC51,USGS XC25Data:USGS 2008. GSE XC51,USGS XC25
9
Longitudinal Profile
10
Questions?
11
Longitudinal Profile Differences