executive summary summary: the comprehensive pl€¦ · executive summary meeting date: august 14,...

Executive Summary Meeting Date: August 14, 2017 Agenda Item: TA/CPA 17-09 Future Land Use Map Amendment 27th Street and Adamo Drive Presenter: Jennifer Malone, AICP ext. 324 Action Necessary: Yes Summary: The Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan is the official document guiding the long-term development of the City of Tampa. The Planning Commission is required to make recommendations to the Tampa City Council on all proposed changes to the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Chapter 97-351, Laws of Florida as amended. Plan Amendment TA/CPA 17-09 is a privately initiated request to amend the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map. The subject site is located in the Central Tampa Planning District, north of Adamo Drive and east of North 26th Street. The subject site is within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The Comprehensive Plan defines the Coastal High Hazard Area as “the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model.” The request is to change the Future Land Use designation for approximately 2.79-acres from Heavy Industrial (HI) to Urban Mixed Use-60 (UMU-60). Under the HI land use category, residential is prohibited on the subject site. The effect of the map amendment, if approved, would remove land designated High Industrial, which the Tampa Comprehensive Plan intends to protect. Industrial lands are vital to the City’s diversified economic base and its long-term stability. The proposed request is not compatible with the surrounding area, which is characterized by active industrial uses east of North 26th Street. The proposal does not further the intent of the goals, objectives, and policies within the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission find TA/CPA 17-09 amendment INCONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to the Tampa City Council. Attachments: Resolution, Staff Report, Map Series, Agency Comments, Site Photos, Basis of Review and Application

Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org

[email protected] 813.-272-5940

601 E Kennedy Blvd 18th Floor

Tampa, FL, 33602

1

http://www.planhillsborough.org/

mailto:[email protected]

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

2

WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission

developed a Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tampa, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which was originally adopted by the Tampa City Council on January 7, 2016 as amended; and

WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission received a privately initiated map amendment to the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission staff

reviewed TA/CPA 17-08 that proposes a Future Land Use designation of Urban Mixed Use-60 from Heavy Industrial for the subject 2.79-acre parcels that are located at 27th Street and Adamo Drive; and

WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission reviewed the proposed map amendment, considered existing/future development patterns and

Resolution Item: City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA 17-09 27th Street and Adamo Drive

AYE NAY ABSENT DATE: August 14, 2017

Mitch Thrower, Chair

Bowen A Arnold, Vice-Chair

Gary Pike, Member-at-Large

Matthew D Buzza

Derek L Doughty, PE Mitch Thrower Chair Theodore Trent Green, RA

Nigel M Joseph

Karen Kress, AICP

Michael Maurino

Jacqueline S Wilds

Melissa E Zornitta, AICP Executive Director

Melissa E. Zornitta, AICP Executive Director

On motion of ____________________ Seconded by ___________________

The following resolution was adopted:

Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org

[email protected] 813-272-5940

601 E Kennedy Blvd 18th Floor

Tampa, FL, 33602

3

http://www.planhillsborough.org/

mailto:[email protected]

Resolution City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA 17-09 27th Street and Adamo Drive August 14, 2017

community facilities, as well as the adopted goals, objectives and policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan as follows:

Livable City- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.1: Recognize the Central Tampa District as the primary urban employment, civic and cultural center, building upon the heritage assets found in its diverse neighborhoods while fostering a vibrant urban lifestyle through mixed-use development via entertainment and cultural facilities. LU Policy 1.1.6: Encourage transit oriented, pedestrian friendly mixed-use development with attractive and multifunctional corridors through Community Planning efforts in the Westshore, Central Tampa and University planning districts. LU Policy 1.1.7: Continue to consider the development of strategically located mixed-use areas in all districts that accommodate local serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses. Mixed-Use Centers and Corridors - Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 6.1: The transformation of major corridors to include a broader mix of uses, both horizontal and vertical, that provides opportunities for medium and higher density housing, while also addressing local and citywide demand for retail and services. LU Policy 6.1.1: Promote redevelopment of existing automobile-oriented corridors and the up- grading of existing commercial development to create vibrant, mixed- use boulevards that balance efficient movement of motor vehicles with the creation of attractive pedestrian-friendly districts that serve the adjoining neighborhoods as well as passing motorists. Industrial Lands- Development and Redevelopment LU Objective 8.9: Recognize industrial lands for their support to key economic engines within the City in order to strengthen Tampa’s role as a regional employment center. LU Policy 8.9.1: Accommodate a range of employment activity to ensure employment opportunities are available for the City’s diverse residential population, including maintaining healthy manufacturing and industrial areas. LU Policy 8.9.2: Encourage the continued intensification, and existence of industrial, warehousing, and distribution facilities and provide opportunities for new warehousing/distribution activities in select locations, to provide a range of employment opportunities to Tampa’s residents. LU Policy 8.9.3: Maintain industrial areas that provide for the manufacturing of goods, flex space, and research and development that are attractive, compatible with adjoining non-industrial uses, and well-maintained.

4

Resolution City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA 17-09 27th Street and Adamo Drive August 14, 2017 LU Objective 8.10: Preserve light and heavy industrial areas which are appropriately located in terms of traffic accessibility, minimizing their environmental effects on surrounding areas, and ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses. LU Policy 8.10.2: Residential uses within industrial land use categories are considered to be non-conforming uses. LU Policy 8.10.4: Ensure an adequate transportation network for industrial development. People living in residential neighborhoods abutting industrial uses shall have safe connections through industrial areas if needed (e.g. Port Tampa City to Picnic Island Park). Adequate Sites to Accommodate Housing Needs HSG Objective 1.3: Ensure that an adequate supply of housing is available to meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Tampa’s households now and in the future in all neighborhoods. HSG Policy 1.3.2: Limit residential development in areas designated as industrial use. Coastal High Hazard Area CM Objective 1.1: Direct future population concentrations away from the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) so as to achieve a no net increase in overall residential density within the CHHA. CM Policy 1.1.1: The CHHA is hereby defined as the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model. CM Policy 1.1.2: The boundary of the CHHA is shown on the Future Land Use Map and shall be the basis for boundary determinations as called for by policies in the Comprehensive Plan. CM Policy 1.1.3: The following shall apply for purposes of evaluating plan amendments and rezonings:

• If 50% or more of a parcel of land is located within the Coastal High Hazard Area, then the entire parcel shall be considered within the Coastal High Hazard Area.

• Isolated areas that are defined by the SLOSH model to be at higher elevations and are surrounded by the CHHA or by the CHHA and a body of water shall be considered within the Coastal High Hazard Area.

CM Policy 1.1.5: Plan amendments within the Coastal High Hazard Area shall be limited to uses that are water enhanced, water related, water dependent, or which have been shown to support the Tampa Port Authority Master Plan. CM Policy 1.1.6: Limit new development in the Coastal High Hazard Area to uses that are vested or shown on the Future Land Use Map and defined in the Urban Design and Land Use Element.

5

Resolution City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA 17-09 27th Street and Adamo Drive August 14, 2017 Hurricane Evacuation and Shelters CM Objective 1.2: Maintain and reduce hurricane clearance times within the City as a component of maintaining and reducing evacuation times for Hillsborough County and the Region. CM Policy 1.2.5: Proposed plan amendments which would increase densities within the Coastal Planning Area shall demonstrate no negative impacts on hurricane evacuation times, routes and shelter demands. Proposed plan amendments that will increase hurricane evacuation times shall mitigate impacts (such as, but not limited to, providing transportation improvements, agreements with HART to provide emergency evacuation service, or emergency van pools).

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission staff determined that TA/CPA 17-09 is inconsistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission finds the Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment INCONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehesive Plan and forwards it to the Tampa City Council for approval.

6

City of Tampa: TA/CPA 17-09 27th Street and Adamo Drive

Planning Commission Public Hearing: August 14, 2017

Future Land Use Map Amendment Summary Information

Application Type Privately Initiated

Location 2701 East 2nd Avenue Located north of Adamo Drive, east of North 26th Street

Property Size 2.79 + acres

Folio Number 189513.0000, 189520.0000

Existing Future Land Use Heavy Industrial (HI)

Proposed Future Land Use Urban Mixed Use-60 (UMU-60)

Existing Land Use Industrial

Roadways Adamo Drive is designated as an arterial roadway. East 2nd Avenue is designated as a local roadway.

Neighborhood East Ybor Historical

Vision Map Designations Central Tampa Planning District

Agency Review Comments Objections: City of Tampa and Environmental Protection Commission All Agency Comments are provided in Attachment B

Applicable Plan Sections Livable City, Industrial Lands, Adequate Sites to Accommodate Housing Needs, Coastal High Hazard Area, Hurricane Evacuation and Shelters

Link to Application http://www.planhillsborough.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TA-CPA-17-09-Application.pdf

Staff Planner Jennifer Malone, [email protected], 813-273-3774 ext.324

Staff Recommendation INCONSISTENT

7

Impact of Proposed Change

The applicant is requesting a Future Land Use Map designation change to the following:

Potential Impact Current Land Use Category Proposed Land Use Category

Acres: 2.79 acres Heavy Industrial (HI)

Urban Mixed Use-60 (UMU-60)

Maximum Density Allows 0 dwelling units per gross acre(DU/AC)

Up to 60 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC)

Maximum Residential Development Potential

0 DU 167 DU

Range of Allowable Uses Industrial or manufacturing that may occur within or outside a building, office and service uses that provide support to the employees, high building coverage.

High density multi-family residential development, general and intensive commercial and professional offices.

Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)/Non-Residential Development

1.5 FAR/182,298.6 square feet of non-residential uses.

3.25 FAR/394,986 square feet of non-residential or residential uses. To encourage a true mixture of uses, residential development may be guided by either density or FAR.

Context of Proposed Change

Practical Impacts

The proposed change would support an urban mixed-use development pattern, increase density and intensity on the site, and allow residential density to be calculated by either FAR or dwelling units.

8

Existing Land Uses and Typical Development in the Area

The existing land use of the subject site is high industrial (dark grey). Surrounding existing land uses are light industrial (light grey), public (blue) and light commercial (pink). The green line represents the Coastal High Hazard Area boundary. The entire subject site is within the Coastal High Hazard area. A study was conducted on the viability of Adamo Drive as a redevelopment corridor in 2005, a portion of the subject site was included in the study area. In 2007, the City of Tampa conducted a second study on the effects redevelopment along Adamo Drive may have on the Ybor City Historic Districts.

Future Land Uses

The subject site currently has a Future Land Use designation of Heavy Industrial (dark grey) which is also present to the north, east, and south of the subject site. This category provides for manufacturing, industrial uses, and intensive commercial uses. This Future Land Use category does not allow for any residential dwelling units. General Mixed Use-24 (light purple) is to the west of the site. General Mixed Use-24 is characterized by a mixture of residential, commercial and light industrial uses with no clear development trend. Community Mixed Use-35 (pink) is located to the southwest

of the subject site. This category provides for areas of medium intensity and density and allows horizontal and vertical mixed use.

Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Criteria

Livable City- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.1: Recognize the Central Tampa District as the primary urban employment, civic and cultural center, building upon the heritage assets foun d in its diver se neighborhoods while fostering a vibrant urban lifestyle through mixed-use development via entertainment and cultural facilities.

9

LU Policy 1.1.6: Encourage transit oriented, pedestrian friendly mixed-use development with attractive and multifunctional corridors through Community Planning efforts in the Westshore, Central Tampa and University planning districts. LU Policy 1.1.7: Continue to consider the development of strategically located mixed-use areas in all districts that accommodate local serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses. Mixed-Use Centers and Corridors - Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 6.1: The transformation of major corridors to include a broader mix of uses, both horizontal and vertical, that provides opportunities for medium and higher density housing, while also addressing local and citywide demand for retail and services. LU Policy 6.1.1: Promote redevelopment of existing automobile-oriented corridors and the up- grading of existing commercial development to create vibrant, mixed- use boulevards that balance efficient movement of motor vehicles with the creation of attractive pedestrian-friendly districts that serve the adjoining neighborhoods as well as passing motorists. Industrial Lands- Development and Redevelopment LU Objective 8.9: Recognize industrial lands for their support to key economic engines within the City in order to strengthen Tampa’s role as a regional employment center. LU Policy 8.9.1: Accommodate a range of employment activity to ensure employment opportunities are available for the City’s diverse residential population, including maintaining healthy manufacturing and industrial areas. LU Policy 8.9.2: Encourage the continued intensification, and existence of industrial, warehousing, and distribution facilities and provide opportunities for new warehousing/distribution activities in select locations, to provide a range of employment opportunities to Tampa’s residents. LU Policy 8.9.3: Maintain industrial areas that provide for the manufacturing of goods, flex space, and research and development that are attractive, compatible with adjoining non-industrial uses, and well-maintained. LU Objective 8.10: Preserve light and heavy industrial areas which are appropriately located in terms of traffic accessibility, minimizing their environmental effects on surrounding areas, and ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses. LU Policy 8.10.2: Residential uses within industrial land use categories are considered to be non-conforming uses. LU Policy 8.10.4: Ensure an adequate transportation network for industrial development. People living in residential neighborhoods abutting industrial uses shall have safe connections through industrial areas if needed (e.g. Port Tampa City to Picnic Island Park). Adequate Sites to Accommodate Housing Needs HSG Objective 1.3: Ensure that an adequate supply of housing is available to meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Tampa’s households now and in the future in all neighborhoods.

10

HSG Policy 1.3.2: Limit residential development in areas designated as industrial use. Coastal High Hazard Area CM Objective 1.1: Direct future population concentrations away from the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) so as to achieve a no net increase in overall residential density within the CHHA. CM Policy 1.1.1: The CHHA is hereby defined as the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model. CM Policy 1.1.2: The boundary of the CHHA is shown on the Future Land Use Map and shall be the basis for boundary determinations as called for by policies in the Comprehensive Plan. CM Policy 1.1.3: The following shall apply for purposes of evaluating plan amendments and rezonings:

• If 50% or more of a parcel of land is located within the Coastal High Hazard Area, then the entire parcel shall be considered within the Coastal High Hazard Area.

• Isolated areas that are defined by the SLOSH model to be at higher elevations and are surrounded by the CHHA or by the CHHA and a body of water shall be considered within the Coastal High Hazard Area.

CM Policy 1.1.5: Plan amendments within the Coastal High Hazard Area shall be limited to uses that are water enhanced, water related, water dependent, or which have been shown to support the Tampa Port Authority Master Plan. CM Policy 1.1.6: Limit new development in the Coastal High Hazard Area to uses that are vested or shown on the Future Land Use Map and defined in the Urban Design and Land Use Element. Hurricane Evacuation and Shelters CM Objective 1.2: Maintain and reduce hurricane clearance times within the City as a component of maintaining and reducing evacuation times for Hillsborough County and the Region. CM Policy 1.2.5: Proposed plan amendments which would increase densities within the Coastal Planning Area shall demonstrate no negative impacts on hurricane evacuation times, routes and shelter demands. Proposed plan amendments that will increase hurricane evacuation times shall mitigate impacts (such as, but not limited to, providing transportation improvements, agreements with HART to provide emergency evacuation service, or emergency van pools).

Staff Analysis

The approximately 2.79-acre subject site is currently designated Heavy Industrial (HI), zoned Industrial Heavy (IH), and located within the Central Tampa Planning District and the Coastal High Hazard Area. It is currently operating as Blacklidge Emulsions, an asphalt emulsion manufacturer. The request is to amend the parcel from Heavy Industrial (HI) to Urban Mixed Use-60 (UMU-60). The subject property is surrounded by the Heavy Industrial Land Use designation and active industrial uses. Directly to the west of the subject site is a brewery. Other uses in the area include a waste collection facility, steel distributor, and a pet cremation facility.

11

While evaluating the surrounding area, staff focused on the land use designation and pattern east of North 26th Street, which is predominantly designated HI. There have been no Comprehensive Plan amendments or rezoning requests to suggest this area is experiencing a transition away from industrial uses. A CSX rail line is located within 500 feet to the east of the subject site. This portion of the CSX line is designated as a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Railway Connector by the Florida Department of Transportation. The SIS was established in 2003 by the Governor and Legislature to identify the state’s facilities most significant for interregional, interstate and international travel. This portion of the CSX line connects to a SIS Railway Corridor and the Port Tampa Bay, which is identified as an SIS Waterway Connector. The subject site benefits from its location to the CSX line, providing access for industrial uses to transport goods via freight. The amendment, if approved, would create an “island effect” of very dense residential/commercial/office development wholly incompatible in terms of form and function to the neighboring land uses. It would also be the first introduction of UMU-60 in the general vicinity, east of North 26th Street. The urban form of the HI land use category is not consistent with the type of urban form within UMU-60. The HI land use category prohibits residential, and benefits from being located within proximity to a vital transportation network. The UMU-60 encourages residential and commercial to interact. The proposed plan amendment has the potential to introduce 167 dwelling units on the subject site and approximately 394,986 square feet of non-residential or residential units. It would also permit a variety of uses, including offices, banks, and restaurants. Manufacturing, heavy repairs, and processing plants would be prohibited, which have defined the surrounding area. Also, if approved, the amendment would allow residential in an area where it was previously prohibited. Directly to the east of the subject site is a transfer station for Republic Services, which is a collection location for waste before the shipment of waste to regional landfills. During a field visit, staff witnessed several trucks driving east on 2nd Avenue, passing the subject site, indicating active industrial uses in the area. If approved, the amendment has the potential to introduce residential directly adjacent to the waste transfer facility which would continue to operate in compliance. Further, this portion of Adamo Drive is not designated as a Transit Emphasis Corridor. The Transit Emphasis Corridor along Adamo Drive is designated from Channelside Drive to 26th Street. Transit Emphasis Corridors are areas in the City where opportunities to create new housing and developments are identified and redevelopment is encouraged (LU Policy 6.1.1). While the Comprehensive Plan supports mixed use development and redevelopment, this is not identified as an area where mixed use development is encouraged or would benefit from a higher density land use category (LU Objective 6.1, LU Policy 6.1.1). The Tampa Comprehensive Plan is clear in its intent to protect and enhance the industrial areas in the City (LU Policy 8.9.2, LU Objective 8.10). These areas are vital to the City’s diversified economic base and its long-term sustainability, and contribute a higher median tax payment per square footage than residential uses (LU Objective 8.9). The Comprehensive Plan recognizes a continued demand for industrial in Tampa, especially around its major economic engines such as the Port of Tampa Bay. The entire subject site is located within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). An objective of the Comprehensive Plan is to direct future populations away from the CHHA (CM Objective 1.1). If approved, the proposed plan amendment would allow residential development where it is currently prohibited. Policy direction in the Comprehensive Plan states that plan amendments which would increase the density within the CHHA must ensure that adequate public hurricane shelter capacity is available to accommodate the future population. In accordance with the “Local Mitigation Strategy” and the Coastal Management Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the applicant would be required to mitigate the impacts of increased hurricane evacuation times (CM Policy 1.2.5).

Recommendation

Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the proposed land use designation change for Tampa Plan Amendment TA/CPA 17-09 from Heavy Industrial (HI) to Urban Mixed Use-60

12

(UMU-60) INCONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to Tampa City Council.

13


14

Attachment A

Map Series

1. General Locator Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Adopted Future Land Use Map 5. Proposed Future Land Use Map Change

15

SR 60 / ADAMO DR

SH

EL

DO

N R

D

COURTNEY CAMPBELL CSWY

78

TH

ST

BUSCH BLVD

FL

OR

IDA

AV

E

FA

LK

EN

BU

RG

RD

US

HW

Y 4

1

BA

YS

HO

RE

BLV

D

AR

ME

NIA

AV

E

BRUCE B

DO

WNS B

LVD

DA

LE

MA

BR

Y H

WY

NE

BR

AS

KA

AV

E

HIM

ES

AV

E

N B

OU

LE

VA

RD

WE

STS

HO

RE

BLV

D

GUNN HWY

HARNEY RD

I-2

75

FOWLER AVE

LEE

RO

YS

ELM

ON

EXP

WY

LUTZ LAKE FERN RD

BLOOMINGDALE AVE

BROADWAY AVE

SR 60 / BRANDON BLVD

US HW

Y 301

FLETCHER AVE

56TH

ST

CR

57

9

BEARSS AVE

VA

LR

ICO

RD

KIN

GS

WA

Y R

D

MA

CD

ILL A

VE

LINEBAUGH AVE

M L KING BLVDWIL

LIA

MS

RD

MO

RR

IS B

RID

GE

RD

HILLSBOROUGH AVE

RACE T

RACK R

D

LIV

ING

ST

ON

AV

E

CAUSEWAY BLVD

I-7

5

I-4

PA

RS

ON

S A

VE

VETERANS EXPWY

BOYETTE RD

RHODINE RD

MC

INT

OS

H R

D

US HWY 92

0 13,000 26,000 39,000 52,0006,500

Feet

µ

CITY OF TAMPAGENERAL LOCATION MAP

MAY 2017PLAN AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL

JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present.

URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present.

ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-CountyPlanning Commisiion.

REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

^TA/CPA 17-04

TA/CPA 17-05^HOWARD FRANKLAND BRIDGE

GANDY BRIDGE

TA/CPA 17-05 ROLAND ST. AND STERLING AVE.

TA/CPA 17-04 BAY TO BAY BLVD. AND HIMES AVE.

PLAN AMENDMENT^

AUTHOR:WELSH

Date: 6/28/2017

Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpaMAY2017loc.mxd

COUNTY BOUNDARY

JURISDICTION BOUNDARY

URBAN SERVICE AREA

TAMPA SERVICE AREA

MAJOR RIVERS

WATER

EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK

LEGEND

FIGURE 1

T̂A/CPA 17-06

TA/CPA 17-07

^ TA/CPA 17-08

^ TA/CPA 17-09^KENNEDY BLVD

COLUMBUS DR

TA/CPA 17-06 TYSON AVE.

TA/CPA 17-07 ROME AVE. AND COLUMBUS DR.

TA/CPA 17-08 25TH ST. AND 2ND AVE.

TA/CPA 17-09 27TH ST. AND 2ND AVE.

16

E 5th Ave

E 3rd Ave

E 2nd Ave

E 4th AveN

26th

St

N 25

th St

N 31

st St

N 27

th St

Adamo Dr

Selm

on C

onne

ctor N

Selm

on C

onne

ctor S

N 28

th St

0 160 320 480 64080

Feet

µ

Date: 6/29/2017

Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1709aerial.mxd

DATA SOURCES: Aerial Photography 2016, Hillsborough County Geomatics.

PARCEL DATA: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser.

REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specificapproval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

LEGEND

Author: colangeg

CITY OF TAMPAAERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY

TA/CPA 17-09

FIGURE 2

ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES

COUNTY BOUNDARY


URBAN SERVICE AREA

PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

TAMPA SERVICE AREA

17

E 5th Ave

E 3rd Ave

E 2nd Ave

N 26

th St

N 25

th St

N 31

st St

N 27

th St

Adamo Dr

Selm

on C

onne

ctor N

Selm

on C

onne

ctor S

N 28

th St

EXISTING LAND USE: Derived from Property Appraiser parcels and NAL DOR Codes.


PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser.



ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.

Date: 6/29/2017

µ

0 120 240 360 48060

Feet

Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1709elu.mxd

Author: colangeg

CITY OF TAMPAEXISTING LAND USE

TA/CPA 17-09

FIGURE 3

LEGEND

SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOME

TWO FAMILY

MULTI-FAMILY

MOBILE HOME PARK

VACANT

PUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONS

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES

RIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYS

EDUCATIONAL

HEAVY COMMERCIAL

LIGHT COMMERCIAL

HIGH INDUSTRIAL

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL

MINING

RECREATION / OPEN SPACE

AGRICULTURAL

NATURAL

WATER

UNKNOWN

NOT CLASSIFIED

PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

EXISTING LAND USE


COUNTY BOUNDARY


URBAN SERVICE AREA

COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY

TAMPA SERVICE AREA

18

Document Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1709flu.mxd

LEGEND

CITY OF TAMPAADOPTED 2040 FUTURE LAND USE

Date: 6/29/2017

Author: colangeg

E 5th Ave

E 3rd Ave

E 2nd Ave

E 4th AveN

26th

St

N 25

th St

N 31

st St

N 27

th St

Adamo Dr

Selm

on C

onne

ctor N

Selm

on C

onne

ctor S

N 28

th St

TA/CPA 17-09

2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, 2009. Jurisdicitonal areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present.



CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area

below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's

computerized storm surge model.

ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County

Planning Commisiion.


0 160 320 480 64080

Feet

µ

FIGURE 4

TAMPA SERVICE AREA


COUNTY BOUNDARY


URBAN SERVICE AREA


PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

CITY OF TAMPA

GENERAL MIXED USE -24

REGIONAL MIXED USE - 100

TRANSITIONAL USE - 24

SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3


URBAN MIXED USE - 60

COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35

RURAL ESTATE - 10

RESIDENTIAL - 6

RESIDENTIAL - 83

RESIDENTIAL - 50

RESIDENTIAL - 10

RESIDENTIAL - 20

RESIDENTIAL - 35

RESIDENTIAL - 3

(1.5 FAR)

(3.5 FAR)

(1.5 FAR)

(.25 FAR)

(.50 FAR)

(3.25 FAR)

(2.0 FAR)

(.65 FAR)

(1.0 FAR)

(.35 FAR)

(.50 FAR)

(.60 FAR)

(.25 FAR)

(.35 FAR)

MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE

RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE

PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC

MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS

HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR)

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR)

COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 (2.0 FAR)

AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

WATER

RIGHT OF WAY

TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION)

NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 16



(.50 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, .75 FAR

VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY)

(.75 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.0 FAR


(1.0 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.5 FAR


19

Document Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1709flu_proposed.mxd

LEGEND

CITY OF TAMPAPROPOSED 2040 FUTURE LAND USE

Date: 6/29/2017

Author: colangeg

2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission.




CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area

below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's

computerized storm surge model.

ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County

Planning Commisiion.


E 5th Ave

E 3rd Ave

E 2nd Ave

E 4th AveN

26th

St

N 25

th St

N 31

st St

N 27

th St

Adamo Dr

Selm

on C

onne

ctor N

Selm

on C

onne

ctor S

N 28

th St

TA/CPA 17-09FROM: HEAVY INDUSTRIAL TO: URBAN MIXED USE - 60

0 160 320 480 64080

Feet

µ

FIGURE 5

TAMPA SERVICE AREA


COUNTY BOUNDARY


URBAN SERVICE AREA


PLAN AMENDMENT AREA

TAMPA FUTURE LAND USE

GENERAL MIXED USE -24

REGIONAL MIXED USE - 100

TRANSITIONAL USE - 24



URBAN MIXED USE - 60

COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35

RURAL ESTATE - 10

RESIDENTIAL - 6

RESIDENTIAL - 83

RESIDENTIAL - 50

RESIDENTIAL - 10

RESIDENTIAL - 20

RESIDENTIAL - 35

RESIDENTIAL - 3

(1.5 FAR)

(3.5 FAR)

(1.5 FAR)

(.25 FAR)

(.50 FAR)

(3.25 FAR)

(2.0 FAR)

(.65 FAR)

(1.0 FAR)

(.35 FAR)

(.50 FAR)

(.60 FAR)

(.25 FAR)

(.35 FAR)

MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE

RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE

PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC

MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS

HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR)

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR)

COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 (2.0 FAR)

AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

WATER

RIGHT OF WAY

TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION)




(.50 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, .75 FAR


(.75 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.0 FAR


(1.0 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.5 FAR


20

Attachment B

Agency Comments

21

STAFF REPORT ON C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT

APPLICATION: CPA 17-09 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 14, 2017

PROPERTY ADDRESS: CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE:

REQUESTED FUTURE LAND USE:

2701 East 2nd Avenue

Vicinity of North Adamo Drive, West of Selmon Expressway

HI UMU-60

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE

The subject property contains 2.79± acres and is located in the Central Tampa Planning District. The property is currently zoned Industrial Heavy (IH), which provides primarily for areas of intensive manufacturing and industrial uses in areas related to the Port of Tampa or other areas capable of supporting such uses. The industrial heavy district is established to provide areas for uses that can generate emissions and are not compatible with primary commercial, institutional, and residential uses. This district requires a minimum lot width of 50’ and a minimum lot area of 5,000 SF. The subject property is adjacent to warehousing and industrial uses to the north, south, east and west. The character of the surrounding neighborhood is primarily industrial.

PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The proposed future land use category of Urban Mixed Use-60 (UMU-60) would allow for the consideration of any of the allowable zoning districts from residential through commercial. It is important to review the current request in relation to those uses currently permitted and the intensification of the property that could occur if the future land use designation is changed to the UMU-60. Key city form characteristics for Urban Mixed Use include:

Blocks are small and rectangular, allowing for convenient pedestrian access from adjacent areas;

Lot sizes that are typically small and narrow, providing a fine-grained development pattern; A mix of building heights, typically up to 10 stories, number of stories varies by location, special

district or overlay district. Building height in local historic districts limited unless approved by the ARC (100 feet) or BLC (60 feet);

Building heights that step down to not more than one story higher at the property line than permitted in the adjacent neighborhood unless separated by a roadway, rail corridor, or other setback or buffer;

Buildings sited at or near the sidewalk along the primary street frontage and typically abut one another with limited side yard setbacks;

Building entrances set at the sidewalk along the primary street frontage; Rear alleys and secondary streets that provide vehicular and service access, with limited

driveways and curb cuts on a primary street; Parking on-street, in individual or shared lots at the rear of structures, or in screened parking

structures; Transparent building frontages with pedestrian-scaled articulation and detailing; Moderately wide sidewalks, with street trees, public seating areas, and inviting amenities;

22

Public streetscapes that serve as the area’s primary open space, complemented by semi-public plazas, courtyards and semi-public sidewalk dining areas; and *Any proposed development, city-wide may develop up to 2.75 FAR, if all of the following are met:

o Subject site is greater than 0.5 acres; o Subject site maintains frontage on an arterial roadway (length of frontage must

meet minimum lot width standard in City Code); and o Structure must have vertically integrated mix of at least 2 uses from 2 separate

general use categories as outlined in City Code. C

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS City of Tampa Planning staff has reviewed this request and has objections. Staff finds the requested Urban Mixed Use 60 land use category INCONSISTENT with the following comprehensive plan goals, objectives, and policies: LU Policy 6.1.6:

Ensure that the introduction of higher density mixed-use development along major arterial corridors and collector roads is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring such features as:

Buildings setback from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-family residential uses;

Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses (including historic districts) to maintain appropriate transitions in scale, massing and height and to protect privacy and solar access;

Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas to the degree feasible; and

Lighting shielded and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses.

This site is located along the arterial corridor of Adamo Drive. The allowance of the requested UMU-60 land use category will allow for the introduction of high-density residential uses and intensive commercial uses with allowable building heights up to ten (10) stories. The UMU-60 category allows uses which are incompatible with the existing development pattern of the surrounding area.

LU Objective 8.9: LU Policy 8.9.3: LU Policy 8.10: LU Policy 8.10.2: LU Policy 8.10.5:

Recognize industrial lands for their support to key economic engines within the City in order to strengthen Tampa’s role as a regional employment center. Maintain industrial areas that provide for the manufacturing of goods, flex space, and research and development that are attractive, compatible with adjoining non-industrial uses, and well-maintained. Preserve light and heavy industrial areas which are appropriately located in terms of traffic accessibility, minimizing their environmental effects on surrounding areas, and ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses. Residential uses within industrial land use categories are considered to be non-conforming uses. Heavy industrial uses shall have priority over other uses on undeveloped property appropriately designated as heavy industrial. This site is surrounded with heavy industrial land use categories to the north, east and south. Along the east side of North 26th Street, as far north as East 6th

23

Avenue, to the southern boundary of Adamo Drive, and as far east as the City limit boundary, the future land use is heavy industrial. The allowable uses in the UMU-60 land use category are incompatible with the surrounding industrial land uses and have the potential to create negative impacts on the surrounding uses. Given the size of this site, the UMU-60 category allows for up to one hundred sixty-seven (167) residential units, which is inconsistent with the surrounding industrial uses. It is important to preserve existing industrial lands which are appropriately located within the City. The location of this site, along Adamo Drive which contains surrounding industrial land uses, is inappropriate for the uses allowed in the requested UMU-60 and is out of character with the surrounding industrial uses.

REVIEW CRITERIA FOR PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTS

City Council must consider the following criteria as set forth in the City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan when deciding the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; both staff’s professional opinion and factual information is provided in bold below:

1. The requested land use category does not meet the intent of the general character description of the City Form component in which it is being requested and is otherwise inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Per the Comprehensive Plan excerpts provided below, “Tampa’s specific ‘City Form’? (Pages 29 – 30)”, the proposed future land use change does not meet the intent of the City Form for this area within the Central Tampa Planning District.

As an urban city, Tampa has a defined city form that encompasses many components such as employment centers, urban villages, mixed-use corridors, mixed-use centers, transit stations, and neighborhoods. Elements of City Form: Development Components The physically built environment called the “City Form” has six (6) major components which are described below. The “City Form” includes the following:

Employment Centers Urban Villages Mixed-use Corridors Mixed-use Centers Transit Stations Neighborhoods

o Urban o Traditional o Suburban and Contemporary o The Waterfront

Tampa’s form is and will continue to be shaped by historical development patterns. The City has developed over the span of 150 years, and is influenced by the building patterns that occurred during three significant periods of time.

2. In approving any request for a land use category that provides for an increase in density, intensity or for a broader range of uses, than the existing land use category, City Council shall take into

24

consideration and determine if:

a. a land use category of similar density or intensity is located on at least one (1) side of the subject site, and There is not a land use category of similar density or intensity abutting the subject property.

b. the subject site is within 1320’ (1/4 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated

transit emphasis corridor, and There is a transit emphasis corridor within ¼ mile of the site: Adamo Drive running east-west through this area.

c. the subject parcel is located adjacent to a parcel which has a land use classification of

R-6 or R-10, the subject site is located within 660’ (1/8 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor. N/A.

3. In the event that City Council determines that the above criteria are not met, then City Council may deny the amendment or make a determination that the existing land use classification is no longer in the best interests of the public, it may approve the amendment or direct the local planning agency to propose an alternative amendment to the existing land use classification. Based on the historical development pattern of the area, the requested UMU-60 land use category is not in the best interest of this area and the City as a whole. This future land use category allows for consideration of a maximum FAR of 3.5 (with bonus provisions). Given that this site is approximately 2.79 acres, this would allow for a building with a maximum of 425,363 SF with an allowable height up to ten (10) stories. Similarly, with a maximum density of 60 dwelling units per acre (with bonus provisions), a total of one hundred sixty-seven (167) residential dwelling units could be developed. This modification would allow for an increase in density/intensity of uses which is out of character with the existing industrial uses and planned development pattern for this area of the Central Tampa Planning District.

4. If a land use is changed based on this criteria, the property owner shall process through a site plan district and, if provided for in the City’s land development regulations, shall meet the “Development Performance Incentive Criteria,” unless the development is within an approved Community Planning Area/Adopted Form Based Code Area, in which case a site plan zoning may not be required, as provided for in the specific plan in the land development regulations. Acknowledged.

Submitted by

LaChone Dock Urban Planner III

Planning and Urban Design

25

MEMORANDUM

Date: June 5, 2017

To: LaChone Dock, Urban Planner III, Planning and Development Department

Through: Brian D. Pickard, P.E., Chief Planning Engineer, Water Department

From: Brett E. Warner, Planning Engineer II, Water Department

Subject: CPA 17-09 Water Department Response

The City of Tampa Water Department (TWD) has reviewed the subject Comprehensive Plan Amendment request. The associated property is within the TWD service area and can be supplied with potable water from TWD’s permitted source and / or Tampa Bay Water. Should the property owner require new water service or a revision to existing water service the owner will be responsible for all applicable costs and fees for such service including but not limited to installing new infrastructure and / or upsizing existing infrastructure as necessary to comply with TWD standards. Additionally the owner may be required to provide easements and / or grassed areas (free of structures, overhangs, walls, fencing, foundations, paving, above and / or below ground utilities, dumpsters, retention ponds, trees, excessive vegetation, hardscaping, etc.) for water utility infrastructure. The specific footprint needs, fees and / or costs are determined upon the owner applying for water service and depend on the owner’s specific needs identified in the application. Please encourage property owners to contact TWD’s planning section as early as possible during site plan preparation to ensure sufficient footprint is allocated for these needs. Fire hydrant flow data is available by contacting Fran D’Antoni at fran.d’[email protected]. The property is not fronted by potable or reclaimed water mains. The nearest potable water main is 8” UCI at the corner of E 2nd Ave and N 27th St. Please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected] should you have any questions or concerns.

26

Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request TA/CPA 17-09

Transportation Information

Road Name From - To Number of Lanes

Adopted LOS

Standard

Current LOS

Pedestrian LOS

Bicycle LOS

Adamo Dr. 22nd St. to 34th St.

4LD D C C D

E. 2nd Ave. N. 22nd St. to N. 26th St.

2LU NA NA NA NA

N. 26th St. Adamo Dr. to E. 4th Ave.

2LU NA NA NA NA

Transportation Analysis – Existing The site is located E. 2nd Ave. North of Adamo Dr., East of North 26th Street. Adamo Dr. has sidewalks but no bicycle facilities. E. 2nd Ave. and N. 26th St. has no sidewalks or bicycle facilities. HART provides bus service in this area. Transportation Analysis – Future Proposed 4 blocks North of the site, (utilizing the existing CSX rail tracks), DMU Rail Transit is identified in the current 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. There are no capacity improvements in this area in the current 5 year Transportation Improvement Program. The HART Transit Development Plan identifies the need for expansion of transit service in this area. Special Area Analysis This area is identified in the MPO’s Demographic Analysis for Environmental Justice Purposes as an area having a high density of minority populations. Residents in these areas tend to be more reliant on cycling, walking, and transit (when available) for their travel purposes – whether to work, school, shopping, and appointments.

27

Raymond O. Shelton School Administrative Center 901 East Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL 33602-3507 Phone: 813-272-4004 FAX: 813-272-4002 School District Main Office: 813-272-4000

P.O. Box 3408 Tampa, FL 33601-3408 Website: www.sdhc.k12.fl.us

MEMORANDUM

To: Jennifer Malone

From: Amber K. Dickerson, AICP

Department Manager, Planning & Siting

Date: May 30, 2017

Re: City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment TPA/CPA 17-09

2701 E 2nd Avenue (189513.0000&189520.0000)

Amendment TPA/CPA 17-09 would convert a 2.79 acre parcel from Heavy Industrial (HI) to

Urban Mixed Use 60 (UMU-60). Up to one hundred and thirty-four (134) dwelling units could

potentially be developed on the site. Based on adopted Student Generation Rates the

amendment could potentially generate twenty-two (22) students in the kindergarten through

5th grade level, eleven (11) students at the 6th through 8th grade level, and eleven (11) students

at the high school level. Per the Department of Education’s Capital Outlay Full Time

Equivalent (COFTE) projections, all of the impacted schools are projected to have capacity in

the next 5 years. However, local data including actual enrollment and approved preliminary

plats indicate that the high school level will be over capacity. The amendment area will be

served by B.T. Washington Elementary School, Madison Middle School, and Blake High School.

The capacity and projected enrollments at the three schools are as follows:

School

FISH

Capacity

Reserved

for

concurrency

Students

generated

by

amendment

2016-17

Enrollment

2016-17

Available

Capacity

2020-21

Projected

Enrollment

2020-21

Available

Capacity

B.T.

Washington

Elementary 638 60 22 553 25 557 81

Madison

Middle 952 157 11 644 151 733 219

Blake High 1705 85 11 1689 -69 1660

45

This is a capacity review, and is not a concurrency determination. A concurrency review will

take place prior the preliminary plat or site plan approval.

28

1

Jennifer Malone

From: Ram Kancharla <[email protected]>Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 9:15 PMTo: Jennifer MaloneSubject: Re: Request for Public Agency Comment on Plan Amendments (City of Tampa)

Jennifer‐ Upon review, I'm fine with the proposed amendments. Thanks for the coordination. Best Regards, Ram Kancharla Vice President Planning & Development Port Tampa Bay W:813‐905‐5162 C:813‐313‐7527 _____________________________ From: Jennifer Malone <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Request for Public Agency Comment on Plan Amendments (City of Tampa) To: Ram Kancharla <[email protected]> Ram, I’m the assigned case Planner on the amendments referenced below. I’m following up to see if the Port had any comments on these amendments. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely,

Right-click or tap and hold here to download pictures. To help p ro tect your privacy, Outlo ok prevented au tomatic download of this picture from the In ternet.cid:[email protected]

Jennifer E. Malone [email protected] • 813.273.3774 x324 planhillsborough.org All incoming and outgoing messages are subject to public records inspection.

From: Tony LaColla Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:46 AM To: 'Ram Kancharla ([email protected])' <[email protected]> Cc: Tony Garcia <[email protected]> Subject: Request for Public Agency Comment on Plan Amendments (City of Tampa) Ram, We have six plan amendments this cycle but need comments back from you on two of them as they are located near Port Tampa Bay. See attached.

29

1

Jennifer Malone

From: Tony LaCollaSent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:55 PMTo: Melissa Dickens; Jennifer MaloneSubject: FW: EPC Comments for CPA 17-04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09Attachments: City of Tampa CPA 17-06_Signed.pdf

Expires: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:00 AM

From: Thompson, Mike [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:53 PM To: Tony LaColla <[email protected]> Cc: David Hey <[email protected]> Subject: EPC Comments for CPA 17‐04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09 Tony, Attached are detailed EPC Staff comments for TA‐CPA 17‐06. Additionally staff comments for the other subject CPAs follow. TA‐CPA 17‐07: Wetlands Management Division Wetlands on‐site ( Hillsborough River). Any activity interfering with the integrity of wetland(s) or other surface water(s), such as clearing, excavating, draining or filling, without written authorization from the Executive Director of the EPC or authorized agent, pursuant to Section 1‐11.07, Rules of the Commission, would be a violation of Section 17 of the Environmental Protection Act of Hillsborough County, Chapter 84‐446, and Chapter 1‐11, Rules of the EPC. TA‐CPA 17‐09: Air Management Division The proposed amendment will place residential development next to other Heavy Industrial classified parcels, which can be a source of complaints (even when the facilities are operating in compliance). The parcel is the current site of a permitted air pollution source, Blacklidge Emulsions. If there is any information on where the facility will relocate, please share that information with EPC staff as they will most likely need an air construction permit if they are moving. TA‐CPA 17‐04, 17‐05, 17‐08 NO COMMENTS Let me know if you have any questions on these comments, Sincerely, Michael S. Thompson Project Manager Wetlands Management Division Environmental Protection Commission Of Hillsborough County (813) 627-2600 ext1219

30

Attachment C

Photos

Subject site, facing southeast on 2nd Avenue.

31

Subject site, facing south on 2nd Avenue.

32

Facing east along 2nd Avenue. Subject site is strip of grass on the bottom right of the photo.

33

Metro Recycling facility at the eastern end of 2nd Avenue.

34

Attachment D

Basis of Review

Adopting and Amending Plan

The Tampa City Council shall have the power to adopt and amend the Tampa Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 97-351, Laws of Florida, as amended; Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; and the provisions of this section. The Local Planning Agency may submit to the Tampa City Council proposals for amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. Citizens owning or having a substantial interest in property may submit to the Local Planning Agency proposals for amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. The Tampa City Council shall review any such proposal for the purpose of assessing its appropriateness in light of the Goal, Objectives, and Policies of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, and after receiving recommendations from The Planning Commission and Tampa City Administration, shall provide final interpretation of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan and take action.

All citizens, whether they are directly or indirectly affected shall be given an opportunity to contribute to the planning and policy-making process through public meetings and hearings. However, all questions of standing shall be reviewed pursuant to relevant law. Amendment to the Adopted Tampa Comprehensive Plan

Amendment of any aspect of the comprehensive plan represents a major policy decision by the Tampa City Council. An amendment of the Future Land Use Map, in particular, is a declaration that growth and development pattern initially sought by the City in a particular location, through thoughtful adoption of the comprehensive plan, is no longer appropriate. A significant change in

circumstances affecting the suitability of property in a particular area for the kind of development intended by the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, which was not contemplated at the time the comprehensive plan was adopted, may justify a reconsideration of the land use category into which that area has been placed on the map. Future Land Use Map changes not functionally related to the overall purposes expressed in the Map and policies contained herein could seriously undermine the integrity of the Map and other provisions of the comprehensive plan itself. Amendments therefore should not occur with the same frequency as parcel rezoning

amendments; and their effect upon the entire Comprehensive Plan, including the practical consequences of the policy shift signified by the amendment shall be considered. It is a stated public purpose that growth and change in neighborhoods must be managed so that the quality of life in this part of the city form is maintained or enhanced. The plan amendment process is one tool that will be used to achieve this. Assessing a Proposed Amendment

In assessing the merits of a Plan amendment, the Local Planning Agency and the Tampa City Council shall consider the policy implications the amendment would have on the Future Land Use

Map in the general area of the affected property and the development pattern and growth policies currently being pursued there. In order that the Tampa City Council may be able to fully assess the consequences of approving the proposed change, the Local Planning Agency’s report to the City Council shall include:

35

An assessment of the consistency of the proposed change with other portions and features

of the Plan, and

Recommendations for whatever further amendment would be advisable in conjunction with

the proper amendment, and

An analysis of infrastructure requirements for service necessitated and the benefits

generated by the proposed amendment, and/or

A finding, if applicable, based on information currently available, that an error or mistake had

been made in the original land use designation shown on the Future Land Use Map.

If a development proposal is not supported by the Goals, Objectives, and Policies within the

Plan, serious consideration should be given to making modifications to the proposal, or the

following criteria should be used to determine if a Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be

justified.

the character of the adjacent neighborhood;

the zoning and uses of nearby properties;

the suitability of the property for the uses allowed under the current zoning designation;

the type and extent of positive or detrimental impact that may affect adjacent properties, or

the community at large, if the request is approved; the impact of the proposal on public utilities

and facilities;

the length of time that the subject and adjacent properties have been utilized for their current

uses;

the benefits of the proposal to the public health, safety, and welfare compared to the effect

on the applicant if the request is not approved;

comparison between the existing Future Land Use Plan Map and the proposed change

regarding the relative conformance to the goal and policies; and

consideration of professional staff recommendations.

In the case of more comprehensive proposals (such as a capital improvements program, or a subarea plan/study), a more extensive evaluation may be required to identify potential revisions to the proposal or to the Plan. The report should include an evaluation which includes the following:

description of the proposal; identification of Sections of the Comprehensive Plan that would be affected by the proposal;

evaluation of the effects of the proposal on the Comprehensive Plan, by Section. If the proposal supports the Plan, the evaluation should also indicate; but if it conflicts with the Plan, the nature and extent of the conflict should be identified; and

identification of adjustments to the Plan or the proposals that would reduce any noted conflicts or negative impacts. If adjustments to the Plan are proposed, they should be undertaken and adopted per the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process before f inal action is taken on the comprehensive proposal.

36

Review Criteria for Plan Amendment Requests In considering a plan amendment, City Council shall review the following criteria:

The requested land use category meets the intent of the general character description of the City Form component in which it is being requested and is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

In approving any request for a land use category that provides for an increase in density, intensity or for a broader range of uses, than the existing land use category, City Council shall take into consideration and determine if::

a land use category of similar density or intensity is located on at least one (1) side of the subject site, and

the subject site is within 1320’ (1/4 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor, and

the subject parcel is located adjacent to a parcel which has a land use classification of R-6 or R-10, the subject site is located within 660’ (1/8 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor.

In the event that City Council determines that the above criteria are not met, then City Council may have cause to deny the amendment. If City Council makes a determination that the existing land use classification is no longer in the best interests of the public, it may approve the amendment or direct the local planning agency to propose an alternative amendment to the existing land use classification.

If a land use is changed based on this criteria, the property owner shall process through a site plan district and, if provided for in the City’s land development regulations, shall meet the “Development Performance Incentive Criteria,” unless the development is within an approved Community Planning Area/Adopted Form Based Code Area, in which case a site plan zoning may not be required, as provided for in the specific plan in the land development regulations.

37


38

Attachment E

Application

39

executive summary summary: the comprehensive pl€¦ · executive summary meeting date: august 14,...

Documents