excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: is there a magic ball? copyright © 2015, all rights...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism:
Is There a Magic Ball?
COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
From the Publishers of
![Page 2: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Terms of Use
The Consult Guys® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of ACP.
The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice.
Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the Consult Guys® slide sets constitutes copyright infringement.
Copyright © 2015
![Page 3: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Guys:I am in our observation unit and I need some sage advice to settle a disagreement. I
just saw a 48-year-old woman who was admitted last night with left pleuritic chest
pain. She has had 5 days of URI symptoms with hacking nonproductive cough. Her
medical history is unremarkable and she has no history of VTE or PE, no recent
surgery or immobilization, no hemoptysis. She has no history of cancer.
Exam:•Afebrile
•BP 130/70
•HR 90 bpm•Lungs clear with scattered wheeze.
•Cardiac rhythm regular
•Heart sounds normal (no murmur)
•Extremity exam is normal
•O2 sat 95%
•CXR: clear lung fields
So hear is the rub:
I am concerned about the pleuritic nature of the chest pain. While my suspicion is
that her symptoms are due to a viral upper respiratory tract infection I think that she
needs a CT pulmonary angiogram to be as sure as possible that she doesn’t have a
pulmonary embolus. My partner says no, a high sensitivity D-Dimer should be done
and only if that is elevated should a CT pulmonary angiogram be done. Our resident
says that no test is necessary because the likelihood of this being a pulmonary
embolus is low.
Can you guys direct us on this one?
Guys:I am in our observation unit and I need some sage advice to settle a disagreement. I
just saw a 48-year-old woman who was admitted last night with left pleuritic chest
pain. She has had 5 days of URI symptoms with hacking nonproductive cough. Her
medical history is unremarkable and she has no history of VTE or PE, no recent
surgery or immobilization, no hemoptysis. She has no history of cancer.
Exam:•Afebrile
•BP 130/70
•HR 90 bpm•Lungs clear with scattered wheeze.
•Cardiac rhythm regular
•Heart sounds normal (no murmur)
•Extremity exam is normal
•O2 sat 95%
•CXR: clear lung fields
So hear is the rub:
I am concerned about the pleuritic nature of the chest pain. While my suspicion is
that her symptoms are due to a viral upper respiratory tract infection I think that she
needs a CT pulmonary angiogram to be as sure as possible that she doesn’t have a
pulmonary embolus. My partner says no, a high sensitivity D-Dimer should be done
and only if that is elevated should a CT pulmonary angiogram be done. Our resident
says that no test is necessary because the likelihood of this being a pulmonary
embolus is low.
Can you guys direct us on this one?
Copyright © 2015
![Page 4: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Patient
Copyright © 2015
![Page 5: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Copyright © 2015
![Page 6: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Very low:
No further testing neededLow to Intermediate:
D-dimer helps with the risk stratificationHigh likelihood:
Proceed to imaging
(CT Pulmonary Angiogram)
Probability of Pulmonary Embolism
Copyright © 2015
![Page 7: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Why Not CT Scan Everyone?
Copyright © 2015
Increased use has not led to improved patient outcome
With increased use in ED leading to increased
detection there has been
no reduction in mortalityRadiation exposureCost
![Page 8: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
*
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(9):701-711. doi:10.7326/M14-1772
Our patient = 0: Low risk
Copyright © 2015
![Page 9: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(9):701-711. doi:10.7326/M14-1772
Our patient = 0: Low risk
Copyright © 2015
![Page 10: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the
American College of PhysiciansAnn Intern Med. 2015;163(9):701-711. doi:10.7326/M14-1772
Copyright © 2015
![Page 11: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of
PhysiciansAnn Intern Med. 2015;163(9):701-711. doi:10.7326/M14-1772
Pathway for the evaluation of patients with suspected PE.PERC = Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria.
* Using either a clinical decision tool or gestalt.PE = pulmonary embolism;
Figure Legend:
Copyright © 2015
![Page 12: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Pearls
Use validated clinical prediction rules to estimate pretest probability
Do not obtain D-dimer measurements or imaging studies in patients with a low pretest probability of PE and who meet all PERC
Obtain a high sensitivity D-dimer measurement as the initial diagnostic test in patients who have an intermediate pretest probability of PE or in patients with a low pretest probability of PE who do not meet all PERC
Copyright © 2015
![Page 13: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Pearls
Do not use imaging tests as the initial test in patients who have a low or intermediate pretest probability of PE
When a D-dimer is indicated age adjust it in patients older than 50 (top normal = age x 10ng/ml)
Do not obtain an imaging study in patients with a D-dimer below the age adjusted cut off
Do not obtain D-dimer in patients with a high probability of PEObtain a CT Pulmonary angiogram in patients with high
probability PEReserve V/Q scans for high pretest probability patients who have
contraindications to CTPA or if CTPA is indicated but not available
Copyright © 2015
![Page 14: Excluding the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Magic Ball? COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED From the Publishers of](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062805/5697c0041a28abf838cc479e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Copyright © 2015 COPYRIGHT © 2015, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Produced by
and