excited qcd 2010, february 3 (tatra national park, 2010)

18
Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010) Holographic Models for Holographic Models for Planar QCD without Planar QCD without AdS/CFT Correspondence AdS/CFT Correspondence Sergey Afonin Ruhr-University Bochum (Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship) ed on S.S. Afonin, arXiv:1001.3105

Upload: maisie-church

Post on 30-Dec-2015

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010). Holographic Models for Planar QCD without AdS/CFT Correspondence. S ergey Afonin. Ruhr -University Bochum (Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship). Based on S.S. Afonin, arXiv : 1001.3105. A brief reminder. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Holographic Models for Planar QCD Holographic Models for Planar QCD without AdS/CFT Correspondencewithout AdS/CFT Correspondence

Sergey Afonin

Ruhr-University Bochum(Alexander von Humboldt Fellowship)

Based on S.S. Afonin, arXiv:1001.3105

Page 2: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

A brief reminder

AdS/CFT correspondence – the conjectured equivalence between a string theorydefined on one space and a CFT without gravity defined on conformal boundary ofthis space.

Maldacena example (1997):Type IIB string theory onin low-energy (i.e. supergravity)approximation

55AdS S

YM theory on AdS boundary4

in the limit 2 1YMg N

AdS/QCD correspondence – a program to implement such a duality for QCD following the principles of AdS/CFT correspondence

Up

dow

n

Bottom

up

String theory

QCD

We will discuss

(4, 2) :SO Equivalence of energy scales The 5-th coordinate – (inverse) energy scale

Page 3: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 4: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

An important example of dual fields for the QCD operators:

Main assumption of AdS/QCD: There is an approximate 5d holographic dual for QCD

Here

J

Page 5: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

A typical model (Erlich et al., PRL 95, 261602 (2005))

For

Hard wall model:

The fifth coordinate corresponds to the energy scale:

Because of the conformal isometry of the AdS space, the running of the QCD gauge coupling is neglected until an infrared scale . At oneimposes certain gauge invariant boundary conditions on the fields.

Equation of motion for the scalar field

Solution independent of usual 4 space-time coordinates

where M is identified with the quark mass matrix and Σ with the quark condensate.

CSB - Ok

Page 6: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Soft wall model (Karch et al., PRD 74, 015005 (2006))

The IR boundary condition is that the action is finite at

To have the Regge like spectrum:

To have AdS space in UV asymptotics:

The mesons of arbitrary spin can be considered, the spectrum is

2z

Page 7: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 8: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 9: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 10: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Let us substitute the expansion (17) into the action (11) and integrate over z

Page 11: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 12: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 13: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Regge spectrum

Reminder: the spectrum is obtained from

Assumptions

Page 14: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

The most viable model

Requirements

1) Phenomenology:

2) Quark-hadron duality for J=1:

The only possibility – the soft wall model!

For positive-sign dilaton (except the scalars)

This coincide with the AdS/CFT prescription if we interpolate the meson states (except the scalars) by the lowest twist operators in QCD

and substitute their canonical dimension

into

Page 15: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Chiral symmetry breaking

Page 16: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)
Page 17: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Example: soft wall model with positive-sign dilaton

After the replacement the spectrum is defined by

For the case in question (axial-vector mesons)

Page 18: Excited QCD 2010, February 3 (Tatra National Park, 2010)

Conclusions

• The holographic approach represents an alternative language for expressing the phenomenology of QCD sum rules in the large-N limit.

• The practical results of holographic models can be reproduced without use of the AdS/CFT prescriptions.

• The 4D ”visualization” of holographic CSB description leads to a natural emergence of the CSB scale and a natural degeneracy of highly excited vector and axial-vector mesons.