example air quality report...regional air quality. input parameters for the emissions model mobile5b...

1

June, 1999

Example Air Quality Report

1. Introduction

The proposed project is located in the city of New York, Richmond County. It involves two parts.The first part is to add right turning lanes in the north and south bound directions of Route 1 at theintersection of Route 1 and Route 2 (Figures 1 and 3). Due to the increase of traffic volumes at theintersection, traffic conditions are deteriorating and long queues are often observed in the north andsouth bound lanes during peak traffic hours. The proposed addition of right turning lanes is designedto reduce traffic congestion and improve the level of service (LOS) at the intersection. The secondpart of the proposed project involves roadway realignment and widening of Route 1. The proposedrealignment and widening is located about 3 miles north of Rte1/Rte 2 intersection and is about 1.2miles long to reduce turning movement and improve traffic capacity. There are two buildalternatives for the second part of the project. Alternative A will include realignment and adding onelane in both north and south bound directions. Alternative B is similar to Alternative A, but willonly add one lane in the north bound direction. Construction will begin in the year 2000 and willbe completed in the same year.

The proposed project is in an area of severe nonattainment for ozone and moderate nonattainmentfor CO. Under the requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA90), the impactof certain transportation projects on air quality must be studied to determine if they conform to thepurpose of the State Implementation Plan which is the attainment of the National Ambient AirQuality Standards (NAAQS). The transportation conformity regulation, "Conformity to State orFederal Implementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Funded, Developedor Approved Under Title 23 U.S.C or the Federal Transit Act" (40 CFR Parts 51 and 93), is used forconformity determinations. The project has been classified as a nonexempt project under theseregulations.

Due to the addition of right turning lanes at the intersection, distances between receptors androadways (see Figure 1 and Figure 3) have been reduced by more than 10%. The realignment andwidening of Rte 1 have also caused roadway-receptor distance reductions by more than 10% andtraffic volume increases of more than 10%. The traffic volumes for the intersection and the free-flow sites have met the threshold for a carbon monoxide (CO) microscale analysis. In addition, thelevel of service (LOS) of the intersection for both build and no-build alternatives is D. Accordingto the air quality analysis procedures in Chapter 1.1 of the Environmental Procedures Manual (EPM),the potential impact of the project on air quality needs to be evaluated.

2

Since the project includes alternatives with different roadway alignments and capacity, regionalemissions must to be estimated for the alternatives. Although the project comes from a conformingTransportation Improvement Program (TIP), only one build alternative has been included in theregional emission analysis for the TIP conformity determination. Therefore, it is necessary toconduct a mesoscale emission study for the project’s various alternatives. All roadways affected bythe project were included in the mesoscale analysis.

2. Mesoscale Emission Analysis

The mesoscale emission analysis was conducted according to the air quality guidance in Chapter 1.1of the EPM. The analysis was done for VOC, CO, and NOx. Peak hour emissions were estimatedfor all three pollutants based on the peak hour traffic volume and speed for each segment of theaffected roadways. These information resulted in a relative comparison of the project’s effect onregional air quality.

Input Parameters for the Emissions Model

MOBILE5B was used for emission factor estimates. For the purpose of the mesoscale andmicroscale air quality analysis, a project specific vehicle mix and vehicle cold start survey wereconducted along the project area and its affected roadways. The field survey indicated that vehiclecold start percentage is 40%. Since a hot start percentage determination was not part of the survey,the default 11% hot start value from Chapter 1.1 of the EPM was used. Provided below is theproject specific vehicle mix information:

Light Duty Gas Vehicle (LDGV) 82.5%

Light Duty Gas Truck-Category 1 (LDGT1) 7.9%

Light Duty Gas Truck- Category2 (LDGT2) 4.0%

Heavy Duty Gas Vehicle (HDGV) 1.8%

Light Duty Diesel Vehicle (LDDV) 0.8%

Light Duty Diesel Truck (LDDT) 0.2%

Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle (HDDV) 2.7%

Motorcycles (MC) 0.1%

This vehicle mix information was used for VOC and NOx emission estimates in summer. Forwinter CO emission estimates, the 0.1% fraction from MC was added to LDGV for the emissionfactor calculation using Carbon Monoxide Emission Factor Table AA in the Attachment 1.1-E ofChapter 1.1 of the EPM.

In addition to the above vehicle thermal state and mix data, the following information was used forthe MOBILE5B inputs:

3

� two I/M programs (the base I/M program starts in 1982 and the enhanced I/Mprogram starts in 1999);

� anti-tampering program starting in 1984 with functional pressure and purge testsstarting in 1999;

� reformulated gasoline starting in 1995;� LEV program starting in 1994;� oxygenated fuel in effect in winter for CO;� downstate average vehicle registration distribution;.� ambient temperature for winter CO - 430 F;

ambient temperature for summer VOC and NOx - 87.30 F;

Regional Emissions For the Three Alternatives

The emission estimates for each alternative were based on the vehicle volume and speed for eachsegment of the roadway. Due to the proposed roadway realignment and lane addition, traffic patternsfor the surrounding roadways will be changed. Vehicle speeds will be improved on differentsegments depending on the build alternatives. Vehicle emissions from the affected roadways havebeen analyzed to study the project’s impact on regional emissions.

Vehicle average speed, segment lengths, and traffic volumes for each segment of the affectedroadways are summarized in Tables 1a through 3c for the build and no-build alternatives. Based onspeed, emission factors for VOC, NOx , and CO are provided along with other parameters in thesetables. Tables 1a, 1b and 1c provide the calculated peak hour vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and totalhourly emissions for each roadway segment for VOC, CO, and NOx in years 2000, 2010, and 2020for the no-build alternative. Total emissions are also provided for each model year for eachpollutant. Similar information for the other two build alternatives are given in Tables 2a to 3c.

Table 4 is a summery of total emissions (in grams) for the no-build and build alternatives. Theresults indicate that Alternative A has the least amount of emissions for all three pollutants comparedto the No-Build Alternative and Alternative B. The reduction in CO emissions between AlternativeA and the No-Build Alternative is significant, ranging from 13.7% to 14.9% for the years studied.The reductions of VOC and NOx emissions between these alternatives are about 10% and 2.3%,respectively. Alternative B also provides net emission reductions compared to the No-BuildAlternative, although not as large as with Alternative A.

From the above regional emissions analysis, it can be concluded that the proposed project will notincrease regional emissions. Instead, it provides substantial regional emission reduction and isconsistent with air quality goals.

4

Table 1a. VOC regional emissions for the No-Build Alternative.

Segment Length

(mi)

VehicleAverageSpeed(mi/hr)

VOC Emission Factor (g/mi) Peak Hour Traffic Volume(veh)

Peak Hour VMT (mi) Peak Hour VOC Emission (g)

2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 3200 3714 4310 3840.0 4456.8 5172.0 3341 2316 2482

1.1 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 0.52 0.48 2694 2200.0 2553.1 2963.4 1914 1328 1422

1.0 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 1200 1393 1616 1200.0 1393.0 1616.0 1044 724 776

1.3 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 2400 2785 3232 3120.0 3620.5 4201.6 2714 1883 2017

Total VOC Emission 9013 6252 6697

Table 1b. CO regional emissions for the No-Build Alternative.

Segment Length

(mi)


CO Emission Factor (g/mi) Peak Hour Traffic Volume(veh)

Peak Hour VMT (mi) Peak Hour CO Emission (g)

2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 3200 3714 4310 3840.0 4456.8 5172.0 44467 34585 38066

1.1 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 2000 2321 2694 2200.0 2553.1 2963.4 25476 19812 21811

1.0 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 1200 1393 1616 1200.0 1393.0 1616.0 13896 10810 11894

1.3 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 2400 2785 3232 3120.0 3620.5 4201.6 36130 28095 30924

Total CO Emission 119969 93302 102694

5

Table 1c. NOx regional emissions for the No-Build Alternative.

Segment Length

(mi)


NOx Emission Factor (g/mi) Peak Hour Traffic Volume(veh)

Peak Hour VMT (mi) Peak Hour NOx Emission (g)

2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 3200 3714 4310 3840.0 4456.8 5172.0 5146 4412 4913

1.1 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 2000 2321 2694 2200.0 2553.1 2963.4 2948 2528 2815

1.0 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 1200 1393 1616 1200.0 1393.0 1616.0 1608 1379 1535

1.3 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 2400 2785 3232 3120.0 3620.5 4201.6 4181 3584 3991

Total NOx Emission 13882 11903 13255

Table 2a. VOC regional emissions for Alternative A.

Segment Length

(mi)




2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 2400 2785 3232 2880.0 3342.0 3878.4 2506 1738 1862

1.1 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 1200 1393 1616 1320.0 1532.3 1777.6 1148 797 853

1.0 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 2000 2321 2694 2000.0 2321.0 2694.0 1740 1207 1293

1.2 40 0.71 0.41 0.38 3200 3714 4310 3840.0 4456.8 5172.0 2726 1827 1965


6

Table 2b. CO regional emissions for Alternative A.

Segment Length

(mi)




2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 2400 2785 3232 2880.0 3342.0 3878.4 33350 25934 28545

1.1 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 1200 1393 1616 1320.0 1532.3 1777.6 15286 11891 13083

1.0 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 2000 2321 2694 2000.0 2321.0 2694.0 23160 18011 19828

1.2 40 8.28 5.33 5.02 3200 3714 4310 3840.0 4456.8 5172.0 31795 23755 25963


Table 2c. NOx regional emissions for Alternative A.

Segment Length

(mi)




2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 2400 2785 3232 2880.0 3342.0 3878.4 3859 3309 3684

1.1 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 1200 1393 1616 1320.0 1532.3 1777.6 1769 1517 1689

1.0 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 2000 2321 2694 2000.0 2321.0 2694.0 2680 2298 2559

1.2 40 1.37 1.01 0.97 3200 3714 4310 3840.0 4456.8 5172.0 5261 4501 5017


7

Table 3a. VOC regional emissions for Alternative B.

Segment Length

(mi)




2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 2700 3133 3636 3240.0 3759.6 4363.2 2819 1955 2094

1.1 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 1500 1741 2020 1650.0 1915.1 2222.0 1436 996 1067

1.0 30 0.87 0.52 0.48 1700 1973 2290 1700.0 1973.0 2290.0 1479 1026 1099

1.2 40 0.71 0.41 0.38 2900 3366 3906 3480.0 4039.2 4687.2 2471 1656 1781


Table 3b. CO regional emissions for Alternative B.

Segment Length

(mi)




2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 2700 3133 3636 3240.0 3759.6 4363.2 37519 29175 32113

1.1 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 1500 1741 2020 1650.0 1915.1 2222.0 19107 14861 16354

1.0 30 11.58 7.76 7.36 1700 1973 2290 1700.0 1973.0 2290.0 19686 15310 16854

1.2 40 8.28 5.33 5.02 2900 3366 3906 3480.0 4039.2 4687.2 28814 21529 23530


8

Table 3a. NOx regional emissions for Alternative B.

Segment Length

(mi)




2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

1.2 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 2700 3133 3636 3240.0 3759.6 4363.2 4342 3722 4145

1.1 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 1500 1741 2020 1650.0 1915.1 2222.0 2211 1896 2111

1.0 30 1.34 0.99 0.95 1700 1973 2290 1700.0 1973.0 2290.0 2278 1953 2176

1.2 40 1.37 1.01 0.97 2900 3366 3906 3480.0 4039.2 4687.2 4768 4080 4547


9

Table 4. Summary of VOC, CO, and NOx regional emissions for all the alternatives of the proposedroadway realignment and widening project.

AlternativeVOC (g/hour) CO (g/hour) NOx (g/hour)

2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020 2000 2010 2020

No Build 9013 6252 6697 119969 93302 102694 13882 11903 13255

Build A 8120 5569 5973 103591 79590 87419 13569 11625 12949

Build B 8204 5633 6041 105127 80875 88851 13598 11651 12978

3. CO Microscale Air Quality Analysis

The CO microscale air quality analysis is based on the air quality analysis guidance in Chapter 1.1of the EPM. Since the project is in a CO nonattainment area, the analysis was conducted for the year2000 (ETC) and the critical analysis year of 2010 (ETC+10) or 2020 (ETC+20) for both the buildand no-build alternatives. At this intersection (Rt 1/Rt 2) only one build alternative is proposed.

Carbon Monoxide NAAQS

The NAAQS for CO are a one-hour average concentration of 35 ppm which cannot be exceededmore than once per year and an eight-hour average concentration of 9 ppm which cannot be exceededmore than once per year. The results of the air quality analysis are compared with these one-hourand eight-hour NAAQS.

Existing Air Quality Condition

The project is located in a CO nonattainment area. Due to the improvement of vehicle emissions andother traffic control measures, CO concentrations have been reduced in recent years. NYSDEC airquality monitoring data indicate that the maximum 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrationsare 9.0 ppm and 6.3 ppm, respectively, in 1996 at monitoring site XX, which is the closest monitorto the proposed project.

Models Used In the Air Quality Analysis

Vehicle emission factors are based on Carbon Monoxide Emission Factor Table AA, which iscalculated with MOBILE5B using the most up-to-date input parameters for the study area. Theseemission factors are used as input for the microscale dispersion model CAL3QHC Version 2(abbreviated as CAL3QHC).

10

Emission Factors

Emission factors are from the Carbon Monoxide Emission Factor Table AA in the Attachment 1.1-Eof the EPM. Input parameters for the CO emissions factors are provided in the table andsummarized in Section 2 above. The emission factors are determined for each link at their respectivespeeds.

The free flow speed at the proposed intersection is 30 mph. At the free flow site, both buildalternatives will improve the average vehicle speed from the no-build 30 mph to 40 mph. Based onthese speeds, vehicle mix, and thermal state, it is determined that the free flow and idle emissionfactors are:

Speed Year 2000 Year 2010 Year 2020

30 mph 11.58 7.76 7.36

40 mph 8.28 5.33 5.02

Idle 211.95 138.84 131.17

The free flow emission factors are in unit of g/mi and the idle emission factors are in g/hour. Theseemission factors will be used in the CAL3QHC model.

Critical Year Analysis

Emission factors for the critical year analysis are based on the average travel speed, which includesintersection delay. Based on the traffic information, the average speed for all links is 20 mph. Usingthis average vehicle speed and the total traffic volumes at the intersection for years 2010 and 2020,a critical year analysis has been performed. Emission factors, traffic volumes, and total emissionsource strengths for year 2010 and year 2020 are provided below:

Emission factor(g/veh-mi)

TrafficVolume (vph)

Total Emission SourceStrength (g/mi/hr)

Year 2010 12.67 3,016 38,212

Year 2020 12.09 3,510 42,436

According to the total emission source strength at the intersection, it was determined that year 2020is the critical year. Therefore, the potential air quality impact of the proposed project will beanalyzed for the years of 2000 and 2020.

CO Background Concentrations

11

C2020 ' C2007 × (0.2 %EF2020 × G

EF2007

× 0.8),

G ' (1 %GR100

)n,

According to Chapter 1.1 of the EPM, the one-hour and 8-hour average background concentrationsfor both year 2000 and year 2007 are 3.3 ppm and 2.3 ppm, respectively. Based on the projectedannual average traffic growth rate (compound growth rate) of 1.5 % for the project area and vehicleaverage speed of 20 mph, the 1-hour and 8-hour background concentrations for year 2020 can becalculated with the following formula,

and

where C2007 and C2020 are the year 2007 and 2020 background concentrations, EF2007 and EF2020 arethe emission factors for 2007 and 2020 (13.29 g/veh-mi and 12.09 g/veh-mi, respectively), G is thetotal traffic growth from 2007 to 2020, GR is the annual regional traffic growth rate in percentageand n is the number of years from 2007 to 2020. The background concentrations for year 2020 werecalculated to be 3.6 and 2.5 ppm for 1-hour and 8-hour averages, respectively.

Persistence Factor

A persistence factor of 0.70 is used to convert 1-hour average concentration to 8-hour averageconcentration (without background).

Wind Speed

1 m/s wind speed is used in the CAL3QHC dispersion model.

Surface Roughness Height

Since the project is located in a urban residential area, a surface roughness height of 108 cm is used.

Atmospheric Stability

Atmospheric stability D is used for the urban environment.

Wind Directions

The model calculation is performed at 50 increments from 00 to 3550. Since the maximum 8-houraverage concentrations at any receptor did not exceed 8.0 ppm, a 10 increment wind angle searcharound the maximum was not performed.

12

Receptor Locations

Due to the addition of turning lanes at the Route 1/Route 2 intersection, the distances between thereceptors and the roadways are reduced by more than 10%. Receptor locations are shown in Figures1-4. A total of 14 receptors were selected for the air quality analysis. Four of the 14 receptors arelocated at the nearest corner of the property lines of four residences. The rest of the receptors areplaced on sidewalks. Two sidewalk receptors are located at the two corners of the intersection andthe others are placed at 25 m and 50 m from the corner receptors along the sidewalks.

For the proposed roadway realignment and lane addition, besides the more than 10% source-receptordistance reduction, traffic volumes have increased by more than 10%. Since there are no sidewalks,the nearest points along the residential property lines were selected as receptors. This will add anadditional 5 receptors as shown in Figures 5 and 6.

Model Result Analysis

Provided in the Appendix are the input and output files for the build and no-build alternatives foryears 2000 and 2020. The results from the model represent 1-hour average concentrations due tothe nearby modeled traffic only. To determine the total one-hour average concentration at eachreceptor, the 1-hour background value is added to the dispersion modeling results. For the 8-houraverage concentration at each receptor, the 1-hour dispersion component from the model ismultiplied by the persistence factor of 0.70 and the product is added to the corresponding 8-hourbackground value.

Tables 5 and 6 show the 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations at the 14 receptor sites nearthe intersection for the build and no- build alternatives, respectively, for years 2000 and 2020. Themaximum 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations for the build alternative are 6.0 ppm and 4.2 ppm atreceptor 10 at the wind direction of 50 in year 2000. Twenty years after project completion, themaximum 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations are reduced to 5.7 ppm and 4.0 ppm at the winddirection of 50 due to the improvement in vehicle emissions. Under the no-build alternative for year2000, the maximum 1-hour and 8-hour concentrations are 6.2 ppm and 4.3 ppm, respectively, at thesame wind direction and receptor location as the build alternative. The maximum 1-hour and 8-houraverage concentrations for the year 2020 no-build alternative are 5.8 ppm and 4.0 ppm, respectively,at the wind direction of 50 at receptor 10. These concentrations are in compliance with the NAAQS.

Table 5. 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations (ppm) for the Build Alternative at theintersection of Route 1 and Route 2.

13

ReceptorCO (ppm) - 2000 Build CO (ppm) - 2020 Build

1-hour 8-hour Wind Dir. 1-hour 8-hour Wind Dir.

Rec 1 5.2 3.6 3050 5.0 3.5 2800

Rec 2 4.0 3.4 3450 5.0 3.5 3400

Rec 3 4.5 3.1 1250 4.5 3.1 950

Rec 4 4.6 3.2 1100 4.5 3.1 1100

Rec 5 5.9 4.1 1900 5.7 4.0 1850

Rec 6 5.5 3.8 2450 5.1 3.6 2250

Rec 7 4.9 3.4 2550 5.1 3.6 2550

Rec 8 5.3 3.7 2150 5.2 3.6 2150

Rec 9 5.0 3.5 1950 5.0 3.5 2050

Rec 10 6.0 4.2 50 5.7 4.0 50

Rec 11 5.5 3.8 650 5.1 3.6 450

Rec 12 5.0 3.5 800 5.1 3.6 750

Rec 13 5.3 3.7 300 5.2 3.6 450

Rec 14 5.0 3.5 100 5.0 3.5 200

14

Table 6. 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations (ppm) for the No-Build Alternative at theintersection of Route 1 and Route 2.

ReceptorCO (ppm) - 2000 No Build CO (ppm) - 2020 No Build


Rec 1 4.9 3.4 3400 4.8 3.3 3400

Rec 2 5.1 3.6 3400 4.9 3.4 3350

Rec 3 4.4 3.1 1350 4.4 3.1 1300

Rec 4 4.5 3.1 1000 4.6 3.2 1450

Rec 5 6.0 4.2 1850 5.7 4.0 1850

Rec 6 5.3 3.7 2450 5.0 3.5 2450

Rec 7 4.8 3.4 2550 5.0 3.5 2550

Rec 8 5.1 3.6 1900 5.0 3.5 1800

Rec 9 5.0 3.5 1850 4.9 3.4 1900

Rec 10 6.2 4.3 50 5.8 4.0 50

Rec 11 5.3 3.7 650 5.0 3.5 800

Rec 12 4.8 3.4 750 5.1 3.6 750

Rec 13 5.2 3.6 100 5.0 3.5 00

Rec 14 5.1 3.6 100 4.9 3.4 50

15

Table 7. 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations (ppm) for Alternative A.

ReceptorCO (ppm) - 2000 Build A CO (ppm) - 2020 Build A


Rec 15 3.9 2.7 200 4.1 2.9 150

Rec 16 3.8 2.7 100 4.0 2.8 100

Rec 17 4.2 2.9 3400 4.3 3.0 1900

Rec 18 4.2 2.9 1950 4.3 3.0 1900

Rec 19 3.8 2.7 1900 4.0 2.8 1900

Table 8. 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations (ppm) for Alternative B.

ReceptorCO (ppm) - 2000 Build B CO (ppm) - 2020 Build B


Rec 15 3.8 2.7 200 4.0 2.8 100

Rec 16 3.7 2.6 50 4.0 2.8 150

Rec 17 4.1 2.9 1900 4.2 2.9 1850

Rec 18 4.1 2.9 1900 4.2 2.9 1850

Rec 19 3.8 2.7 1900 3.9 2.7 1850

16

Table 9. 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations (ppm) for the No-Build Alternative.

ReceptorCO (ppm) - 2000 No Build CO (ppm) - 2020 No Build


Rec 15 3.9 2.7 100 4.1 2.9 250

Rec 16 3.8 2.7 100 4.0 2.8 150

Rec 17 4.5 3.1 3500 4.5 3.1 1950

Rec 18 4.5 3.1 1900 4.7 3.3 1900

Rec 19 3.9 2.7 2050 4.2 2.9 3300

Tables 7, 8, and 9 provide the 1-hour and 8-hour average CO concentrations at the 5 receptors alongthe roadway realignment and lane addition section of the project. Alternative A has maximum 1-hour and 8-hour average concentrations of 4.2 ppm and 2.9 ppm, respectively, in year 2000. Themaximum 1-hour and 8-hour average concentrations for Alternative B in year 2000 is 4.2 ppm and2.9 ppm. The no build alternative has a maximum of 4.5 ppm and 3.1 ppm 1-hour and 8-houraverage CO concentrations in year 2000. For year 2020, the maximum 1-hour and 8-hour averageCO concentrations for the two build alternatives are 4.3 ppm and 3.0 ppm; for the no buildalternative, the are 4.7 ppm and 3.3 ppm, respectively.

The above analysis indicates that the proposed project will not have an air quality impact.

4. Lead Emissions

Emissions of lead from motor vehicles have decreased significantly as a result of lead being phasedout as an additive in motor vehicle fuels. The FHWA has advised that microscale lead analysis forhighway projects is not needed or warranted. Lead emissions from highways have been virtuallyeliminated as a result of the regulation and legislation prohibiting the manufacture, sale, orintroduction into commerce of any engine requiring leaded gasoline since model year 1992, sale ofonly unleaded gasoline, and the requirement for reformulated gasoline to contain no heavy metals(such as lead).

5. Construction Impact

During construction, temporary air quality impacts will be minimized to the maximum extentpracticable. Construction activities can temporarily degrade air quality by way of dust generation

17

due to movement of soil, particulate emissions associated with construction equipment operatingwith diesel fuel, increased emissions from construction worker vehicles or traffic diversions anddetours.

Airborne dust levels will be controlled through wetting of soil surfaces, covering of trucks and otherdust sources. These requirements will be included as part of the specifications of the constructioncontract.

This project will not have any significant traffic diversions or detours.

6. Transportation Conformity Determination

The proposed project is in a severe ozone nonattainment area and moderate CO nonattainment area.Under the requirements of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA90), the impact of certaintransportation projects on air quality must be studied to determine if they conform to the purpose ofthe State Implementation Plan which is the attainment of the National Ambient Air QualityStandards (NAAQS). The transportation conformity regulation, "Conformity to State or FederalImplementation Plans of Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects Funded, Developed orApproved Under Title 23 U.S.C or the Federal Transit Act" (40 CFR Parts 51 and 93), is used forconformity determinations. The project has been classified as a non-exempt project under theseregulations.

The above air quality analysis is based on the latest planning assumptions used by NYMTC, theMetropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the metropolitan New York City area. The analysisis consistent with the most recent NYMTC estimates of traffic volume growth rates and other trafficparameters, including forecast changes in vehicle speed. NYMTC developed these estimates basedon current and future population, employment, and travel and congestion information. The latestplanning assumptions utilized in this air quality analysis are consistent with those in the currentconformity determination for the transportation plan and TIP. Those assumptions formed the basisfor the development of the project-specific traffic parameters used in the air quality analysis for thisproject. The background concentrations used in the air quality analysis for this project were basedon values established in the CO attainment demonstration for the New York City metropoliatn area.

Transit service, increases in transit fares and road and bridge tolls, effectiveness of previouslyimplemented transportation control measures and other similar regional planning assumptions didnot materially affect the development and selection of the alternatives for this project, nor is itexpected that the completion of this project will materially affect these planning assumptions.The air quality analysis has used emission factors from the latest emission model MOBILE5B.

Consultation with NYSDEC concerning this project occurred on February 23, 199x. Thisconsultation included this project’s increase in SOV capacity as required by the conformity criteria.This project results from a congestion management system (CMS) as documented in NYMTC’s TIP.

18

No outstanding issues remain as a result of this consultation.

As part of the environmental processing for this project under the National Environmental PolicyAct and the State Environmental Quality Review Act, a public meeting on this project was held onJanuary 27, 199x. No air quality concerns were identified as a result of this meeting.

Based on the results of the analysis, the project will not cause or contribute to any new localized COviolations or increase the frequency or severity of existing CO violations in the area substantiallyaffected by the project.

The project comes from the currently conforming transportation plan and TIP. The TransportationPlan has been found conform to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) by NYMTC on February 7,199y, and by FHWA/FTA on February 20, 199y. The project is consistent with the policies and purpose of the conforming transportation plan and willnot interfere with other projects in the transportation plan.

The proposed project comes from the TIP found to conform under the Clean Air Amendments of1990. On October 9, 199x, NYMTC made their conformity determination and on October 19, 199x,FHWA/FTA made their conformity determination.

The project design scope and concept have not changed since the TIP and plan conformitydeterminations were made and the facility’s design scope and concept have not changed from thatassumed in the conforming TIP and plan.

7. Summary

The regional emission estimates for the proposed roadway realignment and lane additionsdemonstrate that the proposed Alternatives A and B will contribute regional emission reductions forVOC, CO, and NOx . The CO microscale air quality analysis indicates that the proposed project willnot cause any air quality violations or increase the severity or frequency of existing CO violations.(The no-build analysis shows that there are no existing violations in the project area). Therefore, theproject does not have an air quality impact. The air quality analysis has followed the methodologyas described in NYSDOT’s Air Quality Chapter in the EPM. It complies with the requirement ofCAAA90 and the final rule on transportation conformity.

19

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Build Alternative, showing traffic volumes for year 2000 andreceptor locations.

20

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the Build Alternative, showing traffic volumes for year 2020 andreceptor locations.

21

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the No-Build Alternative, showing traffic volumes for year 2000and receptor locations.

22

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of No-Build Alternative, showing traffic volumes for year 2020 andreceptor locations.

23

Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the Alternative A and No-Build Alternative, showing trafficvolumes for the year 2000 and 2020 and receptor locations.

24

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the Alternative B and No-Build Alternative, showing trafficvolumes for the year 2000 and 2020 and receptor locations.

25

APPENDIX

CAL3QHC INPUT AND OUTPUT

26

Example for Sample Report - Intersection 60.108. 0.00 0.0014 0.3048 0 0Receptor 1 60.00 -40.00 6.00Receptor 2 30.00 -200.00 6.00Receptor 3 -110.00 90.00 6.00Receptor 4 -150.00 40.00 6.00Receptor 5 25.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 6 107.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 7 189.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 8 25.00 107.00 6.00Receptor 9 25.00 189.00 6.00Receptor 10 -24.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 11 -106.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 12 -188.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 13 -24.00 -106.00 6.00Receptor 14 -24.00 -188.00 6.00Year 2000 - Build Alternative 18 1 0 11. Rte 1 NB APP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0 -112.0 500.11.6 0.032.0 22. Rte 1 NB Q AG 6.0 -12.0 6.0 -112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 500 211.95 1600 1 3 13. Rte 1 NB TURN AG 18.0 -6.0 18.0 -112.0 300.11.6 0.032.0 24. Rte 2 NB TURN AG 18.0 -12.0 18.0 -112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 300 211.95 1600 1 3 15. Rte 1 NB APP. AG 6.0 -112.0 6.0-1000.0 800.11.6 0.032.0 16. Rte 1 NB DEP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0 1000.0 600.11.6 0.032.0 17. Rte 1 SB THR. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0 112.0 500.11.6 0.032.0 28. Rte 1 SB Q AG -6.0 12.0 -6.0 112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 500 211.95 1600 1 3 19. Rte 1 SB TURN AG -18.0 6.0 -18.0 112.0 300.11.6 0.032.0 210. Rte 1 SB TURN AG -18.0 12.0 -18.0 112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 300 211.95 1600 1 3 111. Rte 1 SB APP. AG -6.0 112.0 -6.0 1000.0 800.11.6 0.032.0 112. Rte 1 SB DEP. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 600.11.6 0.032.0 113. Rte 2 WB APP. AG 0.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 500.11.6 0.032.0 214. Rte 2 WB Q AG 24.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 500 211.95 1600 1 3 115. Rte 2 WB DEP. AG 0.0 6.0-1000.0 6.0 700.11.6 0.032.0 116. Rte 2 EB APP. AG 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 500.11.6 0.032.0 217. Rte 2 EB Q AG -24.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 500 211.95 1600 1 3 118. Rte 2 EB DEP. AG 0.0 -6.0 1000.0 -6.0 700.11.6 0.032.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

27

1 CAL3QHC: LINE SOURCE DISPERSION MODEL - VERSION 2.0, JANUARY 1992 PAGE 1

JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:31

SITE & METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES ------------------------------- VS = 0.0 CM/S VD = 0.0 CM/S Z0 = 108. CM U = 1.0 M/S CLAS = 4 (D) ATIM = 60. MINUTES MIXH = 1000. M AMB = 0.0 PPM

LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1. Rte 1 NB APP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 -34.1 * 34. 180. AG 500. 11.6 0.0 9.8 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 1.8 -3.7 1.8 -41.2 * 38. 180. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.69 6.3 3. 3. Rte 1 NB TURN * 5.5 -1.8 5.5 -34.1 * 32. 180. AG 300. 11.6 0.0 9.8 4. 4. Rte 2 NB TURN * 5.5 -3.7 5.5 -26.2 * 23. 180. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.41 3.8 5. 5. Rte 1 NB APP. * 1.8 -34.1 1.8 -304.8 * 271. 180. AG 800. 11.6 0.0 9.8 6. 6. Rte 1 NB DEP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 304.8 * 305. 360. AG 600. 11.6 0.0 9.8 7. 7. Rte 1 SB THR. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 34.1 * 34. 360. AG 500. 11.6 0.0 9.8 8. 8. Rte 1 SB Q * -1.8 3.7 -1.8 41.2 * 38. 360. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.69 6.3 9. 9. Rte 1 SB TURN * -5.5 1.8 -5.5 34.1 * 32. 360. AG 300. 11.6 0.0 9.8 10. 10. Rte 1 SB TURN * -5.5 3.7 -5.5 26.2 * 23. 360. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.41 3.8 11. 11. Rte 1 SB APP. * -1.8 34.1 -1.8 304.8 * 271. 360. AG 800. 11.6 0.0 9.8 12. 12. Rte 1 SB DEP. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 * 305. 180. AG 600. 11.6 0.0 9.8 13. 13. Rte 2 WB APP. * 0.0 1.8 304.8 1.8 * 305. 90. AG 500. 11.6 0.0 9.8 14. 14. Rte 2 WB Q * 7.3 1.8 44.8 1.8 * 38. 90. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.69 6.3 15. 15. Rte 2 WB DEP. * 0.0 1.8 -304.8 1.8 * 305. 270. AG 700. 11.6 0.0 9.8 16. 16. Rte 2 EB APP. * 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 -1.8 * 305. 270. AG 500. 11.6 0.0 9.8 17. 17. Rte 2 EB Q * -7.3 -1.8 -44.8 -1.8 * 38. 270. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.69 6.3 18. 18. Rte 2 EB DEP. * 0.0 -1.8 304.8 -1.8 * 305. 90. AG 700. 11.6 0.0 9.81 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:31

ADDITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS -------------------------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARRIVAL * LENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLOW RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE * (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr) ------------------------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 90 45 2.0 500 1600 211.95 1 3 4. 4. Rte 2 NB TURN * 90 45 2.0 300 1600 211.95 1 3 8. 8. Rte 1 SB Q * 90 45 2.0 500 1600 211.95 1 3 10. 10. Rte 1 SB TURN * 90 45 2.0 300 1600 211.95 1 3 14. 14. Rte 2 WB Q * 90 45 2.0 500 1600 211.95 1 3 17. 17. Rte 2 EB Q * 90 45 2.0 500 1600 211.95 1 3

RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Receptor 1 * 18.3 -12.2 1.8 * 2. Receptor 2 * 9.1 -61.0 1.8 * 3. Receptor 3 * -33.5 27.4 1.8 * 4. Receptor 4 * -45.7 12.2 1.8 * 5. Receptor 5 * 7.6 7.6 1.8 * 6. Receptor 6 * 32.6 7.6 1.8 * 7. Receptor 7 * 57.6 7.6 1.8 * 8. Receptor 8 * 7.6 32.6 1.8 * 9. Receptor 9 * 7.6 57.6 1.8 * 10. Receptor 10 * -7.3 -7.3 1.8 * 11. Receptor 11 * -32.3 -7.3 1.8 * 12. Receptor 12 * -57.3 -7.3 1.8 * 13. Receptor 13 * -7.3 -32.3 1.8 * 14. Receptor 14 * -7.3 -57.3 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative

MODEL RESULTS -------------

REMARKS : In search of the angle corresponding to the maximum concentration, only the first angle, of the angles with same maximum concentrations, is indicated as maximum.

WIND ANGLE RANGE: 0.-355.

WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 ------*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0. * 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.5 2.3 1.2 0.4 1.4 1.2 5. * 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 2.7 1.3 0.4 1.7 1.4 10. * 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 2.6 1.3 0.5 1.6 1.7 15. * 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.4 1.3 0.6 1.7 1.7 20. * 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.3 1.4 0.6 1.6 1.6 25. * 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.5 0.6 1.9 1.4 30. * 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.6 2.0 1.1 35. * 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.6 0.6 2.0 1.1

28

40. * 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.9 0.6 2.0 1.1 45. * 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.8 0.9 2.0 1.0 50. * 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.9 1.0 2.0 0.9 55. * 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.9 1.1 1.8 0.7 60. * 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.6 0.7 65. * 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.2 1.3 1.5 0.7 70. * 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.3 0.6 75. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.5 80. * 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.2 0.5 85. * 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.5 1.7 1.1 0.4 90. * 0.3 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.1 0.4 95. * 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.9 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.4 100. * 0.1 0.0 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.8 1.1 0.7 0.9 0.4 105. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.2 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.1 1.5 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.4 110. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.4 115. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.9 0.5 120. * 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.4 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.5 125. * 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.6 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.5 130. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 1.6 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.6 135. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.6 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.6 140. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 145. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 150. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.6 155. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 160. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 165. * 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.8 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.7 0.3 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 170. * 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.8 1.8 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.8 175. * 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.6 2.1 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 180. * 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.5 2.3 1.2 0.4 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.7 185. * 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 2.5 1.3 0.4 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 190. * 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 2.6 1.3 0.5 1.6 1.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 195. * 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.3 2.5 1.3 0.6 1.7 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 200. * 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 2.2 1.4 0.6 1.5 1.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 205. * 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.3 1.9 1.5 0.6 1.9 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative

WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 ------*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210. * 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.3 1.5 1.5 0.6 1.9 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 215. * 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.3 1.4 1.6 0.6 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 220. * 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.3 1.4 1.8 0.6 2.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 225. * 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.3 1.2 1.8 0.8 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 230. * 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 1.3 1.8 1.0 2.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 235. * 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.8 1.1 1.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 240. * 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.5 1.5 2.0 1.2 1.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 245. * 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.5 1.6 2.2 1.3 1.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 250. * 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.5 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 255. * 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.5 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 260. * 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 265. * 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.4 2.1 1.5 1.6 1.1 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 270. * 1.6 0.5 0.1 0.3 2.1 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 275. * 1.7 0.5 0.0 0.2 1.9 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.4 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.0 280. * 1.7 0.5 0.0 0.1 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.9 0.4 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 285. * 1.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.4 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.1 290. * 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.4 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.2 295. * 1.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.9 0.4 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 300. * 1.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.5 1.5 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 305. * 1.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.5 1.5 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.2 310. * 1.6 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.6 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 315. * 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.6 1.3 1.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 320. * 1.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 325. * 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 330. * 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 335. * 1.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 340. * 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 345. * 1.3 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.1 0.4 0.7 0.3 350. * 1.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.8 1.8 1.1 0.4 0.9 0.8 355. * 1.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 2.0 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.9 ------*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MAX * 1.9 1.6 1.2 1.3 2.6 2.2 1.6 2.0 1.7 2.7 2.2 1.7 2.0 1.7 DEGR. * 305 345 125 110 190 245 255 215 195 5 65 80 30 10

THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 2.70 PPM AT 5 DEGREES FROM REC10.

29

Example for Sample Report - Intersection 60.108. 0.00 0.0014 0.3048 0 0Receptor 1 60.00 -40.00 6.00Receptor 2 30.00 -200.00 6.00Receptor 3 -110.00 90.00 6.00Receptor 4 -150.00 40.00 6.00Receptor 5 25.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 6 107.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 7 189.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 8 25.00 107.00 6.00Receptor 9 25.00 189.00 6.00Receptor 10 -24.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 11 -106.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 12 -188.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 13 -24.00 -106.00 6.00Receptor 14 -24.00 -188.00 6.00Year 2020 - Build Alternative 18 1 0 11. Rte 1 NB APP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0 -112.0 675.7.36 0.032.0 22. Rte 1 NB Q AG 6.0 -12.0 6.0 -112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 675 131.17 1600 1 3 13. Rte 1 NB TURN AG 18.0 -6.0 18.0 -112.0 405.7.36 0.032.0 24. Rte 2 NB TURN AG 18.0 -12.0 18.0 -112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 405 131.17 1600 1 3 15. Rte 1 NB APP. AG 6.0 -112.0 6.0-1000.0 1080.7.36 0.032.0 16. Rte 1 NB DEP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0 1000.0 810.7.36 0.032.0 17. Rte 1 SB THR. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0 112.0 675.7.36 0.032.0 28. Rte 1 SB Q AG -6.0 12.0 -6.0 112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 675 131.17 1600 1 3 19. Rte 1 SB TURN AG -18.0 6.0 -18.0 112.0 405.7.36 0.032.0 210. Rte 1 SB TURN AG -18.0 12.0 -18.0 112.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 405 131.17 1600 1 3 111. Rte 1 SB APP. AG -6.0 112.0 -6.0 1000.0 1080.7.36 0.032.0 112. Rte 1 SB DEP. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 810.7.36 0.032.0 113. Rte 2 WB APP. AG 0.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 675.7.36 0.032.0 214. Rte 2 WB Q AG 24.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 675 131.17 1600 1 3 115. Rte 2 WB DEP. AG 0.0 6.0-1000.0 6.0 945.7.36 0.032.0 116. Rte 2 EB APP. AG 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 675.7.36 0.032.0 217. Rte 2 EB Q AG -24.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 675 131.17 1600 1 3 118. Rte 2 EB DEP. AG 0.0 -6.0 1000.0 -6.0 945.7.36 0.032.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

30


JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:32


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1. Rte 1 NB APP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 -34.1 * 34. 180. AG 675. 7.4 0.0 9.8 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 1.8 -3.7 1.8 -71.3 * 68. 180. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.93 11.3 3. 3. Rte 1 NB TURN * 5.5 -1.8 5.5 -34.1 * 32. 180. AG 405. 7.4 0.0 9.8 4. 4. Rte 2 NB TURN * 5.5 -3.7 5.5 -34.0 * 30. 180. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.56 5.1 5. 5. Rte 1 NB APP. * 1.8 -34.1 1.8 -304.8 * 271. 180. AG 1080. 7.4 0.0 9.8 6. 6. Rte 1 NB DEP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 304.8 * 305. 360. AG 810. 7.4 0.0 9.8 7. 7. Rte 1 SB THR. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 34.1 * 34. 360. AG 675. 7.4 0.0 9.8 8. 8. Rte 1 SB Q * -1.8 3.7 -1.8 71.3 * 68. 360. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.93 11.3 9. 9. Rte 1 SB TURN * -5.5 1.8 -5.5 34.1 * 32. 360. AG 405. 7.4 0.0 9.8 10. 10. Rte 1 SB TURN * -5.5 3.7 -5.5 34.0 * 30. 360. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.56 5.1 11. 11. Rte 1 SB APP. * -1.8 34.1 -1.8 304.8 * 271. 360. AG 1080. 7.4 0.0 9.8 12. 12. Rte 1 SB DEP. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 * 305. 180. AG 810. 7.4 0.0 9.8 13. 13. Rte 2 WB APP. * 0.0 1.8 304.8 1.8 * 305. 90. AG 675. 7.4 0.0 9.8 14. 14. Rte 2 WB Q * 7.3 1.8 75.0 1.8 * 68. 90. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.93 11.3 15. 15. Rte 2 WB DEP. * 0.0 1.8 -304.8 1.8 * 305. 270. AG 945. 7.4 0.0 9.8 16. 16. Rte 2 EB APP. * 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 -1.8 * 305. 270. AG 675. 7.4 0.0 9.8 17. 17. Rte 2 EB Q * -7.3 -1.8 -75.0 -1.8 * 68. 270. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.93 11.3 18. 18. Rte 2 EB DEP. * 0.0 -1.8 304.8 -1.8 * 305. 90. AG 945. 7.4 0.0 9.81 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:32

ADDITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS -------------------------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARRIVAL * LENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLOW RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE * (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr) ------------------------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 90 45 2.0 675 1600 131.17 1 3 4. 4. Rte 2 NB TURN * 90 45 2.0 405 1600 131.17 1 3 8. 8. Rte 1 SB Q * 90 45 2.0 675 1600 131.17 1 3 10. 10. Rte 1 SB TURN * 90 45 2.0 405 1600 131.17 1 3 14. 14. Rte 2 WB Q * 90 45 2.0 675 1600 131.17 1 3 17. 17. Rte 2 EB Q * 90 45 2.0 675 1600 131.17 1 3

RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Receptor 1 * 18.3 -12.2 1.8 * 2. Receptor 2 * 9.1 -61.0 1.8 * 3. Receptor 3 * -33.5 27.4 1.8 * 4. Receptor 4 * -45.7 12.2 1.8 * 5. Receptor 5 * 7.6 7.6 1.8 * 6. Receptor 6 * 32.6 7.6 1.8 * 7. Receptor 7 * 57.6 7.6 1.8 * 8. Receptor 8 * 7.6 32.6 1.8 * 9. Receptor 9 * 7.6 57.6 1.8 * 10. Receptor 10 * -7.3 -7.3 1.8 * 11. Receptor 11 * -32.3 -7.3 1.8 * 12. Receptor 12 * -57.3 -7.3 1.8 * 13. Receptor 13 * -7.3 -32.3 1.8 * 14. Receptor 14 * -7.3 -57.3 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative




WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 ------*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0. * 0.8 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 2.0 0.9 0.8 1.2 0.9 5. * 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 2.1 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.2 10. * 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.1 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.3 15. * 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.0 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.3 20. * 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 25. * 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.4 30. * 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.2 35. * 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.2

31

40. * 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.2 45. * 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.0 50. * 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.0 55. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.4 0.9 60. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 0.8 65. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 0.8 70. * 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 0.8 75. * 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.8 80. * 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.3 1.5 1.1 0.7 85. * 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.0 0.7 90. * 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.7 95. * 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 100. * 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.8 0.7 105. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.7 110. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.3 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.7 115. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.7 120. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.7 125. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.7 130. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.7 135. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.7 140. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.9 145. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.8 150. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.8 155. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.7 160. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.7 165. * 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.7 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 1.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.8 170. * 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.5 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.7 175. * 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.7 180. * 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.9 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 185. * 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.6 2.1 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 190. * 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.9 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 195. * 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.9 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 200. * 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 205. * 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.6 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative


THE HIGHEST CONCENTRATION IS 2.10 PPM AT 185 DEGREES FROM REC5 .

32

Example for Sample Report - Intersection 60.108. 0.00 0.0014 0.3048 0 0Receptor 1 60.00 -40.00 6.00Receptor 2 30.00 -200.00 6.00Receptor 3 -110.00 90.00 6.00Receptor 4 -150.00 40.00 6.00Receptor 5 25.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 6 107.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 7 189.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 8 25.00 107.00 6.00Receptor 9 25.00 189.00 6.00Receptor 10 -24.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 11 -106.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 12 -188.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 13 -24.00 -106.00 6.00Receptor 14 -24.00 -188.00 6.00Year 2000 - No Build Alternative 12 1 0 11. Rte 1 NB APP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0-1000.0 800.11.6 0.032.0 22. Rte 1 NB Q AG 6.0 -12.0 6.0-1000.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 800 211.95 1600 1 3 13. Rte 1 NB DEP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0 1000.0 600.11.6 0.032.0 14. Rte 1 SB APP. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0 1000.0 800.11.6 0.032.0 25. Rte 1 SB Q AG -6.0 12.0 -6.0 1000.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 800 211.95 1600 1 3 16. Rte 1 SB DEP. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 600.11.6 0.032.0 17. Rte 2 WB APP. AG 0.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 500.11.6 0.032.0 28. Rte 2 WB Q AG 12.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 500 211.95 1600 1 3 19. Rte 2 WB DEP. AG 0.0 6.0-1000.0 6.0 700.11.6 0.032.0 110. Rte 2 EB APP. AG 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 500.11.6 0.032.0 211. Rte 2 EB Q AG -12.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 500 211.95 1600 1 3 112. Rte 2 EB DEP. AG 0.0 -6.0 1000.0 -6.0 700.11.6 0.032.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

33


JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:34


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1. Rte 1 NB APP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 -304.8 * 305. 180. AG 800. 11.6 0.0 9.8 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 1.8 -3.7 1.8 -323.8 * 320. 180. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 1.10 53.3 3. 3. Rte 1 NB DEP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 304.8 * 305. 360. AG 600. 11.6 0.0 9.8 4. 4. Rte 1 SB APP. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 304.8 * 305. 360. AG 800. 11.6 0.0 9.8 5. 5. Rte 1 SB Q * -1.8 3.7 -1.8 323.8 * 320. 360. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 1.10 53.3 6. 6. Rte 1 SB DEP. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 * 305. 180. AG 600. 11.6 0.0 9.8 7. 7. Rte 2 WB APP. * 0.0 1.8 304.8 1.8 * 305. 90. AG 500. 11.6 0.0 9.8 8. 8. Rte 2 WB Q * 3.7 1.8 41.2 1.8 * 38. 90. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.69 6.3 9. 9. Rte 2 WB DEP. * 0.0 1.8 -304.8 1.8 * 305. 270. AG 700. 11.6 0.0 9.8 10. 10. Rte 2 EB APP. * 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 -1.8 * 305. 270. AG 500. 11.6 0.0 9.8 11. 11. Rte 2 EB Q * -3.7 -1.8 -41.2 -1.8 * 38. 270. AG 284. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.69 6.3 12. 12. Rte 2 EB DEP. * 0.0 -1.8 304.8 -1.8 * 305. 90. AG 700. 11.6 0.0 9.81 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:34

ADDITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS -------------------------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARRIVAL * LENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLOW RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE * (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr) ------------------------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 90 45 2.0 800 1600 211.95 1 3 5. 5. Rte 1 SB Q * 90 45 2.0 800 1600 211.95 1 3 8. 8. Rte 2 WB Q * 90 45 2.0 500 1600 211.95 1 3 11. 11. Rte 2 EB Q * 90 45 2.0 500 1600 211.95 1 3

RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Receptor 1 * 18.3 -12.2 1.8 * 2. Receptor 2 * 9.1 -61.0 1.8 * 3. Receptor 3 * -33.5 27.4 1.8 * 4. Receptor 4 * -45.7 12.2 1.8 * 5. Receptor 5 * 7.6 7.6 1.8 * 6. Receptor 6 * 32.6 7.6 1.8 * 7. Receptor 7 * 57.6 7.6 1.8 * 8. Receptor 8 * 7.6 32.6 1.8 * 9. Receptor 9 * 7.6 57.6 1.8 * 10. Receptor 10 * -7.3 -7.3 1.8 * 11. Receptor 11 * -32.3 -7.3 1.8 * 12. Receptor 12 * -57.3 -7.3 1.8 * 13. Receptor 13 * -7.3 -32.3 1.8 * 14. Receptor 14 * -7.3 -57.3 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative




WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 ------*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0. * 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.0 1.2 1.0 2.6 1.4 0.5 1.7 1.4 5. * 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.9 2.9 1.6 0.5 1.7 1.7 10. * 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 2.9 1.6 0.7 1.9 1.8 15. * 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 2.7 1.7 0.8 1.8 1.8 20. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.5 1.8 0.8 1.5 1.7 25. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.8 0.8 1.8 1.5 30. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.6 0.8 1.7 1.5 35. * 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.6 0.8 1.6 1.4 40. * 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.8 1.6 1.5 45. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.7 0.9 1.6 1.5 50. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.8 1.0 1.6 1.4 55. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.7 1.1 1.4 1.3 60. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.9 1.2 1.3 1.3 65. * 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 70. * 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.1 75. * 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.1 1.0

34

80. * 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.0 85. * 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.1 0.9 90. * 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.9 95. * 0.2 0.0 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.4 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9 100. * 0.1 0.0 0.7 1.2 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 105. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.9 110. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.9 115. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.0 120. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.4 1.1 1.1 125. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.4 1.1 1.1 130. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.4 1.2 1.2 135. * 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.4 1.2 1.2 140. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.2 0.5 0.4 1.2 1.2 145. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.3 0.5 0.4 1.3 1.3 150. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.3 0.5 0.4 1.3 1.3 155. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 1.5 0.5 0.4 1.5 1.5 160. * 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 0.4 0.6 0.2 1.6 0.5 0.4 1.6 1.6 165. * 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.4 0.8 0.5 1.6 0.5 0.4 1.6 1.6 170. * 0.1 0.5 1.0 0.8 1.8 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.8 1.6 0.5 0.2 1.6 1.6 175. * 0.4 0.8 0.8 0.6 2.1 1.2 0.4 1.2 1.1 1.4 0.4 0.1 1.4 1.4 180. * 0.5 1.2 0.7 0.4 2.5 1.4 0.5 1.7 1.3 1.3 0.2 0.0 1.3 1.3 185. * 0.8 1.4 0.5 0.3 2.7 1.5 0.5 1.6 1.7 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.9 190. * 0.8 1.5 0.4 0.3 2.7 1.6 0.7 1.8 1.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 195. * 1.0 1.6 0.3 0.3 2.7 1.7 0.8 1.8 1.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 200. * 0.9 1.5 0.3 0.3 2.3 1.8 0.8 1.5 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 205. * 0.9 1.4 0.3 0.3 2.1 1.7 0.8 1.8 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative



35

Example for Sample Report - Intersection 60.108. 0.00 0.0014 0.3048 0 0Receptor 1 60.00 -40.00 6.00Receptor 2 30.00 -200.00 6.00Receptor 3 -110.00 90.00 6.00Receptor 4 -150.00 40.00 6.00Receptor 5 25.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 6 107.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 7 189.00 25.00 6.00Receptor 8 25.00 107.00 6.00Receptor 9 25.00 189.00 6.00Receptor 10 -24.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 11 -106.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 12 -188.00 -24.00 6.00Receptor 13 -24.00 -106.00 6.00Receptor 14 -24.00 -188.00 6.00Year 2020 - No Build Alternative 12 1 0 11. Rte 1 NB APP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0-1000.0 1080.7.36 0.032.0 22. Rte 1 NB Q AG 6.0 -12.0 6.0-1000.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 1080 131.17 1600 1 3 13. Rte 1 NB DEP. AG 6.0 0.0 6.0 1000.0 810.7.36 0.032.0 14. Rte 1 SB APP. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0 1000.0 1080.7.36 0.032.0 25. Rte 1 SB Q AG -6.0 12.0 -6.0 1000.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 1080 131.17 1600 1 3 16. Rte 1 SB DEP. AG -6.0 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 810.7.36 0.032.0 17. Rte 2 WB APP. AG 0.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 675.7.36 0.032.0 28. Rte 2 WB Q AG 12.0 6.0 1000.0 6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 675 131.17 1600 1 3 19. Rte 2 WB DEP. AG 0.0 6.0-1000.0 6.0 945.7.36 0.032.0 110. Rte 2 EB APP. AG 0.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 675.7.36 0.032.0 211. Rte 2 EB Q AG -12.0 -6.0-1000.0 -6.0 0.012.0 1 90 45 2.0 675 131.17 1600 1 3 112. Rte 2 EB DEP. AG 0.0 -6.0 1000.0 -6.0 945.7.36 0.032.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

36


JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:34


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1. Rte 1 NB APP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 -304.8 * 305. 180. AG 1080. 7.4 0.0 9.8 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 1.8 -3.7 1.8 -1200.2 * 1197. 180. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 1.48 199.4 3. 3. Rte 1 NB DEP. * 1.8 0.0 1.8 304.8 * 305. 360. AG 810. 7.4 0.0 9.8 4. 4. Rte 1 SB APP. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 304.8 * 305. 360. AG 1080. 7.4 0.0 9.8 5. 5. Rte 1 SB Q * -1.8 3.7 -1.8 1200.2 * 1197. 360. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 1.48 199.4 6. 6. Rte 1 SB DEP. * -1.8 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 * 305. 180. AG 810. 7.4 0.0 9.8 7. 7. Rte 2 WB APP. * 0.0 1.8 304.8 1.8 * 305. 90. AG 675. 7.4 0.0 9.8 8. 8. Rte 2 WB Q * 3.7 1.8 71.3 1.8 * 68. 90. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.93 11.3 9. 9. Rte 2 WB DEP. * 0.0 1.8 -304.8 1.8 * 305. 270. AG 945. 7.4 0.0 9.8 10. 10. Rte 2 EB APP. * 0.0 -1.8 -304.8 -1.8 * 305. 270. AG 675. 7.4 0.0 9.8 11. 11. Rte 2 EB Q * -3.7 -1.8 -71.3 -1.8 * 68. 270. AG 176. 100.0 0.0 3.7 0.93 11.3 12. 12. Rte 2 EB DEP. * 0.0 -1.8 304.8 -1.8 * 305. 90. AG 945. 7.4 0.0 9.81 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:34

ADDITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS -------------------------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARRIVAL * LENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLOW RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE * (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr) ------------------------*-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. 2. Rte 1 NB Q * 90 45 2.0 1080 1600 131.17 1 3 5. 5. Rte 1 SB Q * 90 45 2.0 1080 1600 131.17 1 3 8. 8. Rte 2 WB Q * 90 45 2.0 675 1600 131.17 1 3 11. 11. Rte 2 EB Q * 90 45 2.0 675 1600 131.17 1 3

RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Receptor 1 * 18.3 -12.2 1.8 * 2. Receptor 2 * 9.1 -61.0 1.8 * 3. Receptor 3 * -33.5 27.4 1.8 * 4. Receptor 4 * -45.7 12.2 1.8 * 5. Receptor 5 * 7.6 7.6 1.8 * 6. Receptor 6 * 32.6 7.6 1.8 * 7. Receptor 7 * 57.6 7.6 1.8 * 8. Receptor 8 * 7.6 32.6 1.8 * 9. Receptor 9 * 7.6 57.6 1.8 * 10. Receptor 10 * -7.3 -7.3 1.8 * 11. Receptor 11 * -32.3 -7.3 1.8 * 12. Receptor 12 * -57.3 -7.3 1.8 * 13. Receptor 13 * -7.3 -32.3 1.8 * 14. Receptor 14 * -7.3 -57.3 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative




WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 REC6 REC7 REC8 REC9 REC10 REC11 REC12 REC13 REC14 ------*------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0. * 1.1 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.9 2.0 1.1 0.9 1.4 1.0 5. * 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.6 2.2 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.3 10. * 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 15. * 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 20. * 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 25. * 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 30. * 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.2 35. * 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 40. * 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 45. * 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 50. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 55. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.9 60. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 65. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 70. * 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.0 0.8 75. * 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.8

37

80. * 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.4 1.4 0.9 0.7 85. * 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 90. * 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 95. * 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.7 100. * 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.7 105. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 110. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 115. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.7 120. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.7 125. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.7 130. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 135. * 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 140. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.3 1.0 1.0 145. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.3 1.0 1.0 150. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.3 1.0 1.0 155. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.3 1.1 1.1 160. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.1 165. * 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 1.2 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.2 170. * 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.4 0.2 1.3 1.2 175. * 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.6 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.2 0.4 0.1 1.2 1.2 180. * 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.9 1.1 0.9 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.9 185. * 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.7 190. * 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.6 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 195. * 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.5 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 200. * 0.6 1.2 0.4 0.6 1.7 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 205. * 0.6 1.1 0.4 0.6 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report - Intersection RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative



38

Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site 60.108. 0.00 0.00 5 0.3048 0 0Rec 15 -80.00 500.00 6.00Rec 16 -100.00 0.00 6.00Rec 17 50.00 -450.00 6.00Rec 18 50.00 -100.00 6.00Rec 19 100.00 250.00 6.00Year 2000 - Build Alternative A 2 1 0 1Rte 1 SB AG -12.0 1500.0 -12.0-1500.0 1600.8.28 0.044.0 1Rte 1 NB AG 12.0 1500.0 12.0-1500.0 1600.8.28 0.044.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

39


JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative A DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:35


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Rte 1 SB * -3.7 457.2 -3.7 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 1600. 8.3 0.0 13.4 2. Rte 1 NB * 3.7 457.2 3.7 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 1600. 8.3 0.0 13.41 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative A DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:35

ADDITIONAL QUEUE LINK PARAMETERS -------------------------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * CYCLE RED CLEARANCE APPROACH SATURATION IDLE SIGNAL ARRIVAL * LENGTH TIME LOST TIME VOL FLOW RATE EM FAC TYPE RATE * (SEC) (SEC) (SEC) (VPH) (VPH) (gm/hr) ------------------------*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Rec 15 * -24.4 152.4 1.8 * 2. Rec 16 * -30.5 0.0 1.8 * 3. Rec 17 * 15.2 -137.2 1.8 * 4. Rec 18 * 15.2 -30.5 1.8 * 5. Rec 19 * 30.5 76.2 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative A




WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 ------*------------------------------ 0. * 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 5. * 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 10. * 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 15. * 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 20. * 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 25. * 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 30. * 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 35. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 40. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 45. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 50. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 55. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 60. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 65. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 75. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 80. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 85. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 90. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 95. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 105. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 110. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 115. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 120. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 125. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 130. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 135. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 140. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 145. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 150. * 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 155. * 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 160. * 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 165. * 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 170. * 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 175. * 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.2 180. * 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.3 185. * 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.4 190. * 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5

40

195. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.5 200. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 205. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.51 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative A

WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 ------*------------------------------ 210. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 215. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 220. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 225. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 230. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 235. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 240. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 245. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 250. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 255. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 260. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 265. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 270. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 275. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 280. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 285. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 290. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 295. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 300. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 305. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 310. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 315. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 320. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 325. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 330. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 335. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 340. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.5 345. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.5 350. * 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.4 355. * 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.4 ------*------------------------------ MAX * 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.5 DEGR. * 20 10 340 195 190


41

Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site 60.108. 0.00 0.00 5 0.3048 0 0Rec 15 -80.00 500.00 6.00Rec 16 -100.00 0.00 6.00Rec 17 50.00 -450.00 6.00Rec 18 50.00 -100.00 6.00Rec 19 100.00 250.00 6.00Year 2020 - Build Alternative A 2 1 0 1Rte 1 SB AG -12.0 1500.0 -12.0-1500.0 2155.5.02 0.044.0 1Rte 1 NB AG 12.0 1500.0 12.0-1500.0 2155.5.02 0.044.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

42


JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative A DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:36


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Rte 1 SB * -3.7 457.2 -3.7 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 2155. 5.0 0.0 13.4 2. Rte 1 NB * 3.7 457.2 3.7 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 2155. 5.0 0.0 13.41 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative A DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:36


RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Rec 15 * -24.4 152.4 1.8 * 2. Rec 16 * -30.5 0.0 1.8 * 3. Rec 17 * 15.2 -137.2 1.8 * 4. Rec 18 * 15.2 -30.5 1.8 * 5. Rec 19 * 30.5 76.2 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative A





43

195. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 200. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 205. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.41 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative A



44

Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site 60.108. 0.00 0.00 5 0.3048 0 0Rec 15 -80.00 500.00 6.00Rec 16 -100.00 0.00 6.00Rec 17 50.00 -450.00 6.00Rec 18 50.00 -100.00 6.00Rec 19 100.00 250.00 6.00Year 2000 - Build Alternative B 2 1 0 1Rte 1 SB AG -6.0 1500.0 -6.0-1500.0 1300.8.28 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB AG 12.0 1500.0 12.0-1500.0 1600.8.28 0.044.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

45


JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative B DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:36


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Rte 1 SB * -1.8 457.2 -1.8 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 1300. 8.3 0.0 9.8 2. Rte 1 NB * 3.7 457.2 3.7 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 1600. 8.3 0.0 13.41 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative B DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:36


RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Rec 15 * -24.4 152.4 1.8 * 2. Rec 16 * -30.5 0.0 1.8 * 3. Rec 17 * 15.2 -137.2 1.8 * 4. Rec 18 * 15.2 -30.5 1.8 * 5. Rec 19 * 30.5 76.2 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative B





46

195. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 200. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.5 205. * 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.51 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - Build Alternative B



47

Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site 60.108. 0.00 0.00 5 0.3048 0 0Rec 15 -80.00 500.00 6.00Rec 16 -100.00 0.00 6.00Rec 17 50.00 -450.00 6.00Rec 18 50.00 -100.00 6.00Rec 19 100.00 250.00 6.00Year 2020 - Build Alternative B 2 1 0 1Rte 1 SB AG -6.0 1500.0 -6.0-1500.0 1751.5.02 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB AG 12.0 1500.0 12.0-1500.0 2155.5.02 0.044.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

48


JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative B DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:37


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Rte 1 SB * -1.8 457.2 -1.8 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 1751. 5.0 0.0 9.8 2. Rte 1 NB * 3.7 457.2 3.7 -457.2 * 914. 180. AG 2155. 5.0 0.0 13.41 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative B DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:37


RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Rec 15 * -24.4 152.4 1.8 * 2. Rec 16 * -30.5 0.0 1.8 * 3. Rec 17 * 15.2 -137.2 1.8 * 4. Rec 18 * 15.2 -30.5 1.8 * 5. Rec 19 * 30.5 76.2 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative B





49

195. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.3 200. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.3 205. * 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.31 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - Build Alternative B



50

Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site 60.108. 0.00 0.00 5 0.3048 0 0Rec 15 -80.00 500.00 6.00Rec 16 -100.00 0.00 6.00Rec 17 50.00 -450.00 6.00Rec 18 50.00 -100.00 6.00Rec 19 100.00 250.00 6.00Year 2000 - No Build Alternative 12 1 0 1Rte 1 SB 1 AG -6.0 1500.0 -6.0 750.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 2 AG -6.0 750.0 20.0 350.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 3 AG 20.0 350.0 8.0 0.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 4 AG 8.0 0.0 18.0 -320.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 5 AG 18.0 -320.0 -6.0 -700.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 6 AG -6.0 -700.0 -6.0-1500.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 1 AG 6.0 1500.0 6.0 750.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 2 AG 6.0 750.0 32.0 350.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 3 AG 32.0 350.0 20.0 0.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 4 AG 20.0 0.0 30.0 -320.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 5 AG 30.0 -320.0 6.0 -700.0 1200.11.6 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 6 AG 6.0 -700.0 6.0-1500.0 1200.11.6 0.032.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

51


JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:38


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Rte 1 SB 1 * -1.8 457.2 -1.8 228.6 * 229. 180. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 2. Rte 1 SB 2 * -1.8 228.6 6.1 106.7 * 122. 176. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 3. Rte 1 SB 3 * 6.1 106.7 2.4 0.0 * 107. 182. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 4. Rte 1 SB 4 * 2.4 0.0 5.5 -97.5 * 98. 178. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 5. Rte 1 SB 5 * 5.5 -97.5 -1.8 -213.4 * 116. 184. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 6. Rte 1 SB 6 * -1.8 -213.4 -1.8 -457.2 * 244. 180. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 7. Rte 1 NB 1 * 1.8 457.2 1.8 228.6 * 229. 180. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 8. Rte 1 NB 2 * 1.8 228.6 9.8 106.7 * 122. 176. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 9. Rte 1 NB 3 * 9.8 106.7 6.1 0.0 * 107. 182. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 10. Rte 1 NB 4 * 6.1 0.0 9.1 -97.5 * 98. 178. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 11. Rte 1 NB 5 * 9.1 -97.5 1.8 -213.4 * 116. 184. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.8 12. Rte 1 NB 6 * 1.8 -213.4 1.8 -457.2 * 244. 180. AG 1200. 11.6 0.0 9.81 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:38


RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Rec 15 * -24.4 152.4 1.8 * 2. Rec 16 * -30.5 0.0 1.8 * 3. Rec 17 * 15.2 -137.2 1.8 * 4. Rec 18 * 15.2 -30.5 1.8 * 5. Rec 19 * 30.5 76.2 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative




WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 ------*------------------------------ 0. * 0.2 0.1 0.9 0.7 0.4 5. * 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.0 10. * 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 15. * 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 20. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25. * 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 30. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 35. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 40. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 45. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 50. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 55. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 60. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 65. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 70. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 75. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 80. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 85. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 90. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 95. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 105. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 110. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 120. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 125. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 130. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 135. * 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 140. * 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0

52

145. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 150. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 155. * 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 160. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 165. * 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 170. * 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 175. * 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.0 180. * 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.2 185. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.5 190. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 0.4 195. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 200. * 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 0.5 205. * 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.61 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2000 - No Build Alternative



53

Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site 60.108. 0.00 0.00 5 0.3048 0 0Rec 15 -80.00 500.00 6.00Rec 16 -100.00 0.00 6.00Rec 17 50.00 -450.00 6.00Rec 18 50.00 -100.00 6.00Rec 19 100.00 250.00 6.00Year 2020 - No Build Alternative 12 1 0 1Rte 1 SB 1 AG -6.0 1500.0 -6.0 750.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 2 AG -6.0 750.0 20.0 350.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 3 AG 20.0 350.0 8.0 0.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 4 AG 8.0 0.0 18.0 -320.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 5 AG 18.0 -320.0 -6.0 -700.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 SB 6 AG -6.0 -700.0 -6.0-1500.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 1 AG 6.0 1500.0 6.0 750.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 2 AG 6.0 750.0 32.0 350.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 3 AG 32.0 350.0 20.0 0.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 4 AG 20.0 0.0 30.0 -320.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 5 AG 30.0 -320.0 6.0 -700.0 1616.7.36 0.032.0 1Rte 1 NB 6 AG 6.0 -700.0 6.0-1500.0 1616.7.36 0.032.01.0 0.4 1000. 0.0Y 5 0 71

54


JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:38


LINK VARIABLES -------------- LINK DESCRIPTION * LINK COORDINATES (M) * LENGTH BRG TYPE VPH EF H W V/C QUEUE * X1 Y1 X2 Y2 * (M) (DEG) (G/MI) (M) (M) (VEH) ------------------------*----------------------------------------*---------------------------------------------------------- 1. Rte 1 SB 1 * -1.8 457.2 -1.8 228.6 * 229. 180. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 2. Rte 1 SB 2 * -1.8 228.6 6.1 106.7 * 122. 176. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 3. Rte 1 SB 3 * 6.1 106.7 2.4 0.0 * 107. 182. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 4. Rte 1 SB 4 * 2.4 0.0 5.5 -97.5 * 98. 178. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 5. Rte 1 SB 5 * 5.5 -97.5 -1.8 -213.4 * 116. 184. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 6. Rte 1 SB 6 * -1.8 -213.4 -1.8 -457.2 * 244. 180. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 7. Rte 1 NB 1 * 1.8 457.2 1.8 228.6 * 229. 180. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 8. Rte 1 NB 2 * 1.8 228.6 9.8 106.7 * 122. 176. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 9. Rte 1 NB 3 * 9.8 106.7 6.1 0.0 * 107. 182. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 10. Rte 1 NB 4 * 6.1 0.0 9.1 -97.5 * 98. 178. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 11. Rte 1 NB 5 * 9.1 -97.5 1.8 -213.4 * 116. 184. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.8 12. Rte 1 NB 6 * 1.8 -213.4 1.8 -457.2 * 244. 180. AG 1616. 7.4 0.0 9.81 PAGE 2 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative DATE: 10/09/97 TIME: 14:38


RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ------------------ * COORDINATES (M) * RECEPTOR * X Y Z * -------------------------*-------------------------------------* 1. Rec 15 * -24.4 152.4 1.8 * 2. Rec 16 * -30.5 0.0 1.8 * 3. Rec 17 * 15.2 -137.2 1.8 * 4. Rec 18 * 15.2 -30.5 1.8 * 5. Rec 19 * 30.5 76.2 1.8 *1 PAGE 3 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative




WIND * CONCENTRATION ANGLE * (PPM) (DEGR)* REC1 REC2 REC3 REC4 REC5 ------*------------------------------ 0. * 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.4 5. * 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 10. * 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 15. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 20. * 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25. * 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 30. * 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 35. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 40. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 45. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 50. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 55. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 60. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 65. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 70. * 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 75. * 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 80. * 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 85. * 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 90. * 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 95. * 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 100. * 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 105. * 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 110. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 115. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 120. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 125. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 130. * 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 135. * 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 140. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

55

145. * 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 150. * 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 155. * 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 160. * 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 165. * 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 170. * 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 175. * 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 180. * 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.2 185. * 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.9 0.2 190. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.1 0.4 195. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.4 200. * 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.0 0.5 205. * 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.51 PAGE 4 JOB: Example for Sample Report-Free Flow Site RUN: Year 2020 - No Build Alternative



example air quality report...regional air quality. input parameters for the emissions model mobile5b...

Documents