exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
exam 2 review
![Page 2: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
resource economics
• nonrenewable vs. renewable– maximize pv of net benefit– renewable includes growth functions
• characterize efficient allocations
• compare to market allocations
• discuss policy to make market allocations more efficient
![Page 3: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
start with the price equation
• efficiency pricing:
Pt = MECt + MUCt
• where– MEC: Marginal Extraction Cost– MUC: Marginal User Cost
![Page 4: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MUC and Q over time
• efficient MUC rises, reflecting increasing scarcity
• in response, Q extracted falls over time until reaching zero, when total MC = highest WTP (“choke price”) or reach backstop MC
• efficiency requires smooth transition to exhaustion of resource
![Page 5: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
constant MEC with no substitute
![Page 6: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
energy: efficient vs. market outcomes
vulnerability premium
energy: efficient vs. market outcomes
![Page 7: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• surface water– how to allocate a renewable supply among
competing uses– intergenerational effects less important (future
supplies depend on natural phenomenon, e.g. rain, rather than current allocation)
• groundwater– withdrawing now affects future supply
water efficient allocations:surface vs. groundwater
![Page 8: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
efficient allocation: surface water
1. balance btw users• marginal net benefit equal across users
2. handle variability• above-average and below-average flows
must be accommodated
![Page 9: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
efficient allocation: groundwater
• if withdrawal > recharge, eventual exhaust resource
• MEC rises over time as water table falls
• pumping would stop:– no water left– MC pumping > benefit of water or MC of backstop resource
(desalination)
• price rises over time until choke price or switch point
![Page 10: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
utilities pricing: inverted block & seasonal rates
(potentially efficient)
![Page 11: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• MAI = cumulative volume end of decade /
cumulative yrs of growth
• harvest when MAI maximized
forests: biological harvest rule
![Page 12: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
biological harvesting decision
![Page 13: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
economic harvesting rule
• harvest at age that maximizes PV of net benefits
1. planting costs• borne immediately• no discounting
2. harvesting costs• time of harvest• discounted
![Page 14: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
sample problem
Age Volume (cubic ft)11 70021 1,00031 3,000 when to harvest41 6,000 using biological rule?51 8,000 using economic rule?
Price: $2Planting cost: $1,000Harvest cost: $0.50Discount rate: 3%
![Page 15: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
optimal harvest age
• discounting shortens optimal harvest time– less tolerant of slow timber growth– comparing no harvest (increase in value of
timber) to harvest (sell and invest)
• high discount rates also destroy incentive to replant
![Page 16: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
fisheries: biological vs. economic harvest
• biology: “maximum sustainable yield” (MSY)
– yields maximum growth– largest catch that can be perpetually
sustained
• economics: maximize net benefit
![Page 17: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
too much effort! policy responses
• increase MC– require fishing farther from shore, use smaller nets, boats, or motors – but artificially increasing cost inefficient
• total allowable catch – restrictions on effort or size of catch – monitoring, enforcement difficult, also creates race to catch
• individual transferable quotas –quotas allocated, then trade– no race, allows most efficient fishers to buy rights from inefficient
fishers
![Page 19: Exam 2 review. resource economics nonrenewable vs. renewable –maximize pv of net benefit –renewable includes growth functions characterize efficient allocations](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083005/56649f2a5503460f94c443c0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
sample problem
• Costs fisher $20 to fish salmon• Salmon sells for $10 • Harvest rate given X fishers is S = 30X-2X2
• How many people will go fishing, how many salmon will be caught, and what are total profits under– Open access– Limited entry (how many fishers should be allowed to
maximize profit?)