evolving faith - press.umich.edu
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
one
EVOLVING FAITH
Rev. Charles A. Hill and the
Making of a Black Religious Radical
In the short story âFire and Cloud,â published in the 1940 collectionUncle Tomâs Children, African American writer Richard Wright explores
the conâșicts among religion, politics, race, and class by focusing on theinner turmoil and external pressures besetting Reverend Taylor, thestoryâs protagonist. The tale commences with Reverend Taylor, a Blackminister in a small southern town, returning from a discouraging meet-ing with the townâs white relief ofâčcer. Taylor had gone, hat in hand, toplead the case of the townâs nearly destitute and increasingly desperateBlack population. He was rebuffed, told only that âEverybodyâs hungry,and after all, itâs no harder on your people than it is on ours.â1 Theofâčcerâs only suggestion is that Taylor tell his congregation âtheyâll justhave to wait.â Mulling over how best to convey the bad news, Taylorbegins to think, âLawd, mabe them Reds is right,â which is to say maybethe community should band together, stage a massive interracial marchdowntown, and âscare âem inter doinâ something!â2 At the same time,Taylor is worried that such a militant course of action would offend themayor and the townâs white elite, endangering his âșock and the entireBlack community by stirring up the antagonism of local whites. It wouldalso, he fears, place his own position as minister of his church in jeop-ardy, especially since Deacon SmithââA black snake in the grass! A blackJudas!ââis looking for any excuse to engineer Taylorâs ouster.
By the time Taylor arrives at his home, all of these pressures and wor-
25
![Page 2: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ries and competing constituencies have been gathered under one roof,literally. The Reds, Hadley and Green, are in the Bible room; the chief ofpolice, who has been sent by the mayor, is in the parlor; Deacon Smith,who has been using the rumor of a demonstration in his campaign to dis-credit Taylor and curry favor with the local white political bosses, is inthe basement with the other deacons; and a distressed and agitated del-egation from his congregation is crowded into the front hallway. Thephysical structure of the house, then, operates as a symbolic representa-tion of Reverend Taylorâs internal conâșictsâconâșicts that are resolvedwhen Taylor is abducted and savagely beaten by a gang of white men,after which he agrees to support the interracial march. In preparationfor that march Wright has Taylor preach an uncompromising sermon,urging his audience to take collective action on its own behalf.
Sistahs n Brothers, Ah know now! Ah done seen the sign! Wes gotta gittogether. Ah know whut yo life is! Ah done felt it! Its âčre! Its like theâčre that burned me last night! Its sufferin! Its hell! Ah canât bear thisâčre erlone! Ah know now wut t do! Wes gotta git close t one ernother!Gawds done spoke! Gawds done sent His sign. Now its time fer us tack.3
Characteristically, Wright leaves the question of the marchâs successunanswered. We are not told whether the Black and white marchers,united at least for the moment around shared class interests, are able toforce the hand of the townâs elite. While he suggests that all of the par-ticipants, especially the African American ones, have been transformedby the experience of interracial collective struggle, Wright ends with Tay-lorâs newfound conviction that âThis is the way!â âGawd ain no lie!â hetells himself, and the story concludes as he âmumbled out loud, exult-ingly: âFreedom belongs t the strong! ââ4
This story of one religious manâs, one ministerâs, conversion to thenecessity of collective action is instructive for a number of reasons, notthe least of which is Wrightâs ability to capture the complex relationshipof faith to action. At the beginning of the tale the sympathetic Taylor isa man of God, whose authority as a minister anoints him a mediatorbetween the Black community and the white power structure. Sustainedby his faith, he accommodates himself to the racial and class status quo,viewing his passivity as the only viable option in a town (and a world)where âthe white folks jus erbout ownsâ everything. At the storyâs end,Taylorâs faith continues to shape his identity and his actions, but now
26 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 3: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
those actions are geared toward a nonaccommodationist and potentiallyprogressive politics. What has changed is Taylorâs interpretation of whatGod demands and his vision of how best to serve his congregation.
Reverend Taylor had many real life counterparts in the Depressionera, ministers who, like Taylor, were driven by faith and circumstance toparticipate in mass demonstrations, strikes, and other political actions.Progressive activists and unionists in Detroit in the 1930s and early 1940swere blessed with the presence of three such men: the Rev. Horace A.White, Fr. Malcolm C. Dade, and the Rev. Charles A. Hill. All three playeda key role in the cityâs early civil rights movement, and all three areintriguing in their own right. It was the Reverend Hill, however, whodeveloped the most extensive and militant set of positions and allianceswith the Left and whose story therefore seems the most compelling. Hisbiography embodies the dynamic conâșuence of religion and politics dur-ing the formative years of Detroitâs early civil rights community.
Charles Hill did not start as a radical in either a political or a theo-logical sense. In fact, he was once described as âan old-fashion Biblethumping preacher whose only political concern was making thingsright in the sight of the Lord.â5 This wonderfully descriptive statementfrom Hillâs close friend and ally, Coleman A. Young (the labor radicalwho became Detroitâs âčrst Black mayor, in 1973), captures the intrigu-ing admixture of conservative and progressive uses of religion thatformed the beating heart of Hillâs political theology and activism. Likethe âčctional Reverend Taylor, there was nothing particularly radicalabout Hillâs understanding of evangelical Christianity. Unlike the radicaltheologians active in the 1930sââčgures such as Claude Williams andHarry Ward, one of the founding members of the Methodist Federationfor Social ActionâHill never articulated a direct connection betweenChristianity and Marxism; nor did he ever directly urge the overthrow ofcapitalism. And yet this Bible-thumping minister became one of themost militant religious leaders in the city.
Reverend Hill was not a practicing theologian, and unfortunately fewof his writings and sermons survived his death in 1970. Yet Hillâs earlylife and young adulthood offer a number of clues to the sources of hislater political activism. Born in Detroit on April 28, 1893, Hill was thesurviving twin born to Edward Hill, an African American dentist, andMary Lantz Hill, a second-generation German American. There are twofamily stories, or legends, about this union. The âčrst, told by Hillâs eldestson, Charles A. Hill Jr., maintains that the union was little more than aone-night stand. Edward Hill had come to town âfor a convention, you
EVOLVING FAITH 27
![Page 4: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
know,â and Mary Lantz was âa waitress, I think, at a local place. They metand, well, one thing led to another.â The other version, told by Hillâsdaughter, Bermecia Morrow McCoy, insists that Mary Lantz and EdwardHill were formally married, even though there is no trace of a marriagelicense or ofâčcial record. She also points out that Mary Lantz went by thename Mrs. Hill until her death.6
In both heavily gendered versions, Edward and Mary deâčed the racialand sexual norms that structured social interactions in what was then stilla small city teetering on the brink of industrial greatness. Although an1838 statute prohibiting marriage between Blacks and whites had beenrepealed by the Michigan legislature in 1882, the social stigma attachedto such a union at the time of Hillâs birth would have been substantial.And, while Blacks were scattered across the German east side, virtuallyno intermarriages were ofâčcially recorded before the early 1900s.7 Theunion between Mary and Edward may not have been prohibited by thestate, but it was certainly not sanctioned by members of the Lantz family,who, like many other older German immigrants, had become relativelyprosperous as skilled workers. As a result of the unpopular marriage/elicit rendezvous, Mary was forced to sever her familial ties.
Whatever the truth about the nature of their relationship, it ended,but not before a child was conceived. There is no evidence as to whetherEdward Hill ever saw his son or provided any type of emotional or âčnan-cial support for his estranged wife and child. In fact, Hillâs birthcertiâčcate lists his father as âUnknown.â8 Apparently, Edward Hillreturned to Chicago. According to both Hill children, Charles Hill rarelymentioned his father; both children also agree that the two men nevermet. For his mother, however, Charles Hill seemed to harbor only loveand affection. Mary Hillâs life was not an easy one. She was left alone witha redheaded infant who in his third month began to âdarkenââmuch tothe consternation of her friends and neighbors in the German commu-nity near Jay Street and Gratiot on Detroitâs east side. His birth certiâčcatelists him as âWhite,â but this did not stop gossip about Maryâs âcoloredbabyâ from spreading through the community and compounding thehardships faced by the young, ostensibly single mother. Eking out a liv-ing for herself and her child without a strong support network in turn ofthe century Detroit soon proved overwhelming. Shortly after Charles wasbaptized into the Catholic faith, Mary Hill took the drastic step of plac-ing her son in the care of an orphanage, the German Protestant Home,where he would remain for the next eleven to twelve years.
That she was able to place her âcoloredâ baby in the home was fairlyremarkable in itself since nearly all of the cityâs orphanages practiced a
28 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 5: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
policy of racial exclusivity.9 In fact, in a June 1916 exchange of lettersbetween the Rev. John Webster, superintendent of the German Protes-tant Home, and Forrester B. Washington, the âčrst director of the DetroitUrban League (DUL), Webster reported that âwe have never had anycolored children in our Homeâ and had none presently.10 Throughouther sonâs tenure as a ward, Mary continued to work odd jobsâtaking inlaundry and hiring herself out as a maidâand visited Charles sporadi-cally. Aware of his ambiguous status as both âsonâ and âorphan,â not tomention as both legally White and socially colored, his years at the Ger-man Protestant Home passed slowly.
As an adult, Hill rarely mentioned these years. The one story that hiseldest son was able to clearly recall had to do with Hill sneaking into thecellar of the orphanage to lick the sides of the maple syrup barrels. Whilehumorous, Charles Hill Jr. remembers this as a story of deprivation.Although Charles Sr.âs love for, and loyalty to, Mary Hill was never ques-tioned by friends or family, there is little doubt that he was deeplyaffected by his experience in both negative and positive ways. âI thinkthatâs why Daddy was such a good father,â Bermecia recalled. âI meannot having a father, and the orphanage, made him value fatherhood thatmuch more.â11 But the implications of his years in the orphanage extendeven further. On the one hand, his early and prolonged exposure towhite children and administrators may have accounted in part for hislater ease in interracial and majority-white settings. Perhaps it evenformed the basis for his abiding faith in the possibility of integration andracial reconciliation. If a much later remark by his grandson, David Mor-row, is accurate, then Hill found a certain amount of acceptance andsupport at the home. âDuring his early years,â Morrow said in a speechentitled âCharles Andrew Hillâthe Family Manâ delivered at his grand-fatherâs retirement celebration in 1968, âhis teachers in the home rec-ognized his strong character and depended on him to escort them toand from evening prayer service.â12
On the other hand, it is surely the case that his early experiencescomplicated Hillâs efforts to work out his own racial, or interracial, iden-tity. By his eleventh or twelfth year, Hill had had enough. He returned tohis motherâs house on Jay Street determined to assist her and continuehis education. The character of the Jay Street neighborhood, like the cityas a whole, had begun to change. Jay Street was still part of the area nearGratiot Avenue populated by less afâșuent Germans, but by 1905 the areaalso included âthe better class of the colored people,â as well as Jewishfamilies. Naturally, he would have explored his new surroundings as hetraveled from home to school to whatever after-school jobs he could
EVOLVING FAITH 29
![Page 6: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
secure to augment the relatively meager family income. West of Gratiot,near the heart of what had been known as âLittle Berlin,â was WoodwardAvenue, the broad main boulevard that bisected the city, stretching fromthe river outward past Detroitâs ever-expanding northern boundaries.To the far east lay DeQuindre Avenue, with an ethnic and racial patch-work in between.13
Detroitâs near east side, the center of Hillâs geographical existence,was the traditional point of entry for immigrant Detroit, âčrst for theFrench, then for (relatively fewer) Irish, and later for innumerable Ger-mans. In the 1880s and 1890s, it became the portal for immigrant Ital-ians, who established a colony near the river called Paradise Valley, andfor Greeks, Jews, and waves of Poles, who would quickly become thelargest cultural minority group in the city. By the turn of the century, thedeep east side was identiâčed with Irish, Gratiot with Germans, HastingsStreet with Poles and Russian Jews, and Paradise Valley with Italians. Thenarrow sector to the south of Jefferson, the major avenue following thecontours of the Detroit River, was âčlled with dilapidated old warehouses,decaying housing stock, vice, crime, and the poor from all racial and eth-nic groups. In a pattern that was replicated generation after generation,each group would establish a beachhead within the east side and gradu-ally move outâand up, socioeconomically speakingâgenerally towardthe cityâs northern reaches. This is what the better-off, native-born whitepopulation managed to do as Detroit experienced its âčrst major popula-tion boom, from 132,956 residents in 1884 to 205,876 in 1890. The lastgroup to manage this transition in class and social space would beAfrican Americans, who occupied more and more of the east side as oth-ers moved on.14
In the early 1900s, when Hill âčrst encountered it, this African Amer-ican enclave was still relatively small. Before the Civil War, the tiny Blackpopulation of roughly 580 souls had been clustered in the area betweenRandolph Street on the west, Hastings on the east, Gratiot on the northand the river to the south. By the 1870s, Blacks, who made up less than3 percent of the population, began to settle in the old Kentucky district,twenty blocks north of Gratiot and St. Antoine, and throughout the eastside. As the Black population increased (from 4,111 in 1900 to 5,741 in1910), so did its concentration, creating the early outlines of what wouldsoon become a city within a city, with a variety and breadth of institutionsthat could match those of Detroit itself.15
Mary Hill gradually withdrew from friends and neighbors in the yearsfollowing her sonâs return, but she never stood in the way of Charlesâsdesire for increased interaction with African Americans. Indeed, she
30 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 7: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
would periodically accompany him to the various Black churches that heattendedâfaithfullyâevery Sunday. Her own ties to Catholicism and thelocal parish had weakened over the years, and she did not prevent herson from exploring other religious options. Hence, Hill was freethroughout his high school years to frequent no less than threechurches: Ebenezer African Methodist Episcopal (AME); Bethel AME atthe corner of Napoleon and Hastings; and Second Baptist, the oldest ofthe cityâs Black churches, with a stately brick ediâčce on Monroe (origi-nally called Croghan) Street. It was largely through these religious insti-tutions that Hill came to identify with the struggles, hopes, successes,and indignities that were part of the day-to-day existence of DetroitâsBlack population. Indeed, it is difâčcult to underestimate the importanceof Black churches in urban centers during this period. They were oftenthe âčrst institutions to provide social services, and they offered spaces formeetings and gatherings, both spiritual and secular. Moreover, theyendowed their congregants with a sense of belonging, a source of stabil-ity in a chaotic world.16
These institutions also, arguably, augmented Hillâs understanding ofclass stratiâčcation. In Detroit, as elsewhere, church membership was anexcellent measure of class and social status within the Black community.Hence it is signiâčcant that Hill did not seem to have much contact withchurches such as St. Matthewâs Episcopal (at the intersection of St.Antoine and Elizabeth), which catered to the Black elite, particularly thecityâs small group of established Black families. The St. Matthewâs con-gregation included doctors and lawyers and was always led by well-edu-cated clergymen. There was widespread acknowledgment that thechurchâs ornate chapel was the most popular site of worship for mem-bers of the âblue book of colored society in Detroit,â and the parishactively cultivated its reputation among âthose who fancy themselves tothe intelligentsia and the better paid workmen and businessmen.â17
This tendency shaped much of the churchâs history. In an internaldocument, âA Brief History of St. Matthewâs Church,â probably draftedin the early 1920s, the anonymous author makes repeated reference tothe âupstanding, courageous, intelligent, high type class of men whoplayed a role in the establishment and maintenance of the church in itsearly years.â Among this group were men âwho had been free since birthand whose ancestors before them had been free.â These men are men-tioned not only because of their accomplishments, the author relates,but also because âwe believe it to be a just and Christian act to dissipatethe impression of illiteracy of the men of that time.â18
Along with the âhigh typeâ of the congregation and the impressive
EVOLVING FAITH 31
![Page 8: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
education of the clergy, the typewritten history also notes, âOur splendidcontacts with the best and most inâșuential citizenry of the white race hasalways worked for the best interests of our group, as in the past this factis still apparent.â This fact was also apparent throughout the âčrst half ofthe twentieth century, especially as the church continued to enjoy con-tacts with Henry Ford and others. Thus, under the direction of RobertW. Bagnall from 1911 to 1921, when Bagnall left to become theNAACPâs director of branches in New York, and Fr. Everard Daniel until1939, St. Matthewâs membership strove to be âa group conscious of theirrole as community leaders and separate from the âmasses of the laboringclasses.ââ19 It was to those âlaboring classesâ that Hill, the son of a work-ing-class mother, was drawn.
Eschewing the cachet of St. Matthewâs, Hill favored churches, such asBethel AME, whose congregants were from the âmiddling classesââfac-tory workers, carpenters, tailors, janitors, laundresses, and cooksâandSecond Baptist, which also had a predominantly working-class congrega-tion. Bethel was a driving force behind Detroitâs Black institutionaldevelopment in the late nineteenth century. It was particularly active inthe âčeld of education and was the âčrst church to do extensive socialwork among the Black population.20 It was in such institutions, more-over, that Hill found an edifying religious emotionalism to match theevangelical style that he would come to adopt in his own preachingdecades later. But that is not all that he found. Members of all three con-gregations became his friends; their respective pastors became mentorsand role models, perhaps becoming the extended family (and fatherâčgures) he had never had. Hill was particularly drawn to the children ofthese congregations. By the time he entered his âčnal year of high schoolhe had managed to have himself appointed superintendent of the Sun-day schools at Bethel and Second Baptist while serving on the usherboard at Ebenezer.
It was during these years of immersion in Black religious life that Hillbegan to struggle with the question of whether he truly felt âthe callâ ofthe ministry, that urge to preach, as a vocation, that is so central toAfrican American (and Christian) religious expression. In narratives ofthe call experience, conâșict, resistance, and uncertainty are tropes of thestruggle to understand and answer. Those who are called to the ministryoften have to come to terms with feelings of inadequacy, loneliness, anddoubt about their competence to fulâčll a religious vocation.21 Hillâsexperiences âčt this arc. His devotion was strong, yet he remained uncer-tain. The idea of becoming a minister competed with dreams of pursu-ing a career in law or business. With high school graduation swiftly
32 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 9: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
approaching, Hill chose business. He was wary of leaving home, and thefamily âčnances were as precarious as ever, but, with his motherâs bless-ing, he headed to Ypsilanti, Michigan, to attend Cleary Business College,where he earned a degree in business administration.
Cleary was a relatively good vocational school. It was predominantlywhite but not racially exclusive. Moreover, and perhaps more important,it was close enough to Detroit (about thirty miles) that Charles couldreturn home nearly every weekend to continue his Sunday school andother church duties. The short bus ride home every Friday or Saturdayalso gave him the opportunity to visit with his mother. She never failedto prepare his favorite foods or to hand wash and press a stack of whiteshirts so that he would look âpresentableâ throughout the week.22 He didwell in his courses. His transcripts reveal a very basic selection of classestop-heavy with arithmetic, bookkeeping, and ofâčce practices.23
As Hill struggled to blend the secular world of weekday business stud-ies with the spiritual world of the church, he also continued to wrestlewith the question of whether he felt truly called to preach and minister.His chosen path reâșects this doubt and struggle. Hill âčnished Cleary in1912 and accepted an apprenticeship in the downtown ofâčces of Blackattorney William Patrick Sr. with the intent of pursuing a legal career. Atthe same time, he enrolled in a correspondence course offered byMoody Bible College in Chicago. This dichotomy is signiâčcant for atleast two reasons. First, Hillâs actions reveal the extent to which he wasconâșicted over the call and his future. Second, his choice of Moody tellsus something about how Hill conceptualized the role of a minister.
Named in honor of Dwight L. Moody, a nineteenth-century evange-list who operated schools for âBible workâ in the slums of Chicago for six-teen years, Moody Bible College was not a traditional seminary. Rather,the institution was in many ways the perpetuation of Dwight Moodyâsdesire to outâčt laymen for the âpractical workâ of reaching the masses.24
This appreciation for the practical side of the ministry would mark Hillâslong career. He also adopted much of Moodyâs theological framework,which was conservative and evangelical. Hill was comfortable with fairlyliteral scriptural readings and interpretationsâhe was not a theologianin the scholarly senseâand, not surprisingly, he chose to take the âBibleDoctrine Course,â ultimately receiving a degree in âThe Doctrine ofGod, the Doctrine of Jesus Christ, the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit, theDoctrine of Man, and the Doctrine of Angels and Satan.â As a âčeld oftheological inquiry it seems to have emphasized the place of mankindafter the Trinity and to have regarded Satan as a real presence in theworld. This type of theological conservatism is not inconsistent with a
EVOLVING FAITH 33
![Page 10: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
radical politics, and it had the potential, realized in Hillâs later work, tofuel a forthright critique of capitalism, racism, and exploitation.
Hillâs degree from Moody also gave him credentials sufâčcient toenroll in the seminary at Lincoln University in rural Chester, Pennsylva-nia. On the eve of World War I, he matriculated as a probationary stu-dent. Lincoln was an all-Black and all-male college funded by the Pres-byterian Church and endowed with a reputation for producingoutstanding graduates. âThe Black Princeton,â as it was known, was anideal site for ambitious and upwardly mobile young Black men, many ofwhom would go on to become doctors, lawyers, businessmen, and, ofcourse, ministers.
Religion played a major role in the founding and running of theschool. When Lincoln was founded in 1854, its primary mission was tooversee the Christian education of Black men and prepare them to evan-gelize in both the United States and Africa. By the time of Hillâs arrivalin 1914, this mission had become broader and much more secular over-all. Simply put, the impetus to evangelize became wedded to and per-haps submerged within the drive to âupliftâ socially, economically, andpolitically. Moreover, as one of the âčrst institutions dedicated to higherlearning for African Americans, Lincolnâs administrators eschewed theTuskegee-inspired trend toward industrial education. Instead, theychose a path that would make their university âa leading example of aninstitution devoted to the creation of W. E. B. DuBoisâs âtalentedtenth.ââ25
The talented-tenth ideal is often derided (in some cases rightfully so)as mere elitism. As historian Kevin Gaines points out, âthis emphasis onclass differentiation as race progress,â could produce distressing results.âAmid the legal and extralegal repression,â he argues, âmany black elitessought status, moral authority, and recognition of their humanity by dis-tinguishing themselves, as bourgeois agents of civilization, from the pre-sumably undeveloped black majority; hence the phrase, so purposefuland earnest, yet so often of ambiguous signiâčcance, âuplifting therace.ââ26 This is not to suggest that racial uplift was completely devoid ofpositive features. Indeed, uplift was also rooted in a tradition of serviceand social responsibilityâan âeach one, teach oneâ understanding ofcollective struggle and social emancipation. When underpinned by reli-gious faith, particularly the desire to see to it that others were right withGod, uplift focused on both this world and the next. Such a call to ser-vice shaped Hillâs life and career. It had been inculcated years ago in thechurches he joined as an adolescent, cultivated during his years at Lin-
34 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 11: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
coln, and fully expressed in his ministry at Hartford, whose motto wasâWe gather to Worship, We depart to Serve.â
The Lincoln experience seemed to shape Hill in other ways as well.Its diverse student body afforded him the opportunity to interact withyoung men from different geographical regions; because of Lincolnâscontinuing commitment to training African students, he also met stu-dents from different countries. The entering class of 1917, for example,was almost evenly divided between men from southern states, especiallyGeorgia, and northern ones, especially Pennsylvania. The student bodywas also socioeconomically diverse. The administration kept tuition lowand often allowed students to graduate with debt. While this policywould eventually prove disastrous from an administrative and âčnancialstandpoint, it gave âčnancially insecure students such as Hill the chanceto receive a âčrst-rate, liberal-arts-based education.
Lincoln had an all-Black student body, but until 1930 its faculty wasexclusively white. It was also a nonreformist institution that sought toâminimize militant attitudes and maintain a low proâčle in the region.â27
Relatively conservative in outlook, the administration struggled to artic-ulate the potentially nonconservative goal of educating a Black elite inneutral terms. Thus, the students relied on one another to collectivelynegotiate the ambiguities at the heart of the institution. The faculty,while charged with the responsibility of cultivating a group of excep-tional Black men capable of âredeemingâ their race, tended to remainaloof from students both socially and ideologically. By all accounts, racialequality and racial justiceânational and internationalâwere rarely dis-cussed in the classrooms, where strict decorum was maintained at alltimes. This neglect of pressing racial issues, coupled with the social dis-tance between students and faculty, surely helped to encourage the cre-ation of an extracurricular culture of evening âbull sessionsâ and infor-mal debates on such topics as national and international politics, theBlack rights agenda, the war, and colonialism. Copies of Black publica-tions such as the NAACPâs Crisis magazine were circulated and discussedamong students, and the need for heightened militancy in the strugglefor equality was always a topic of conversation.28
A religious sensibility was also pervasive at Lincoln, both inside andoutside the seminary, where Hill was enrolled. In keeping with theschoolâs heritage, all students were required to take two academic semes-ters of religious studies, and attendance at weekly chapel services wasmandatory. In this regard Lincoln was part of the mainstream of Blackeducation, in which all education was to some degree religious. Accord-
EVOLVING FAITH 35
![Page 12: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ing to Horace Mann Bond, a Lincoln graduate who became the collegeâsâčrst Black president in 1945, the university was constructed on a set ofwell-deâčned religious principles. âLincoln University,â he wrote, âis aspiritual, intellectual and social institution.â
Its basic theme derives from the idea that there is but one God. Amonotheistic religion, principally the handiwork of the Jews, has thenecessary corollary that God is the Father of all mankind: the chil-dren of God are Brothers.29
The âFatherhood of Godâ and the âBrotherhood of all Mankindâ areconcepts whose deeper meaning and signiâčcance exceed their primafacie simplicity. If, as the Bible insists, âGod is no respecter of personsâand all men and women are equal in His eyes, then racial prejudice andsocial intolerance are necessarily sinful and immoral.
All the available evidence about Hillâs style of preaching and minis-tering to his âșock, not to mention his broader political theology, showsthat this ethos infused his life and work. âHe preached the Bible,â as hisson put it. He was also âholistic in his theological view,â recalled the Rev.Charles G. Adams, who grew up in Hartford, was mentored by Hill, andassumed the pastorate of the church when Hill retired. âHe was very cos-mopolitan and universalistic.â30 This universalism, or religious ecumeni-calism, is hardly surprising given that Hill was baptized Catholic, raisedat a German Protestant orphanage, prayed at both AME and Baptistchurches, and graduated from a Presbyterian seminary. This same ecu-menical spirit extended to his later political associations.
Hillâs seminary training was strict and traditional; basic requirementswould have included course work in biblical archaeology, homiletics, sys-tematic theology, apologetics, Old Testament exegesis, pastoral theol-ogy, and expression.31 Like many of his classmates, he no doubt came toLincoln with his own ideasâmany of which had been formed throughhis experiences, especially in Black churches, and in his correspondencecourse at Moodyâabout the Bible, Christianity, and their place in theworld. In Hillâs case these ideas translated into âa brand of Christianity[that] demanded activism in society on behalf of the oppressed, theunderdog,â32 which is a classic expression of both the social gospel andthe prophetic strain within African American Christianity. This is not tosuggest that either the social gospel or prophetic Christianity was part ofthe Lincoln curriculum, but certainly students were free to work outtheir own understandings of the relationship between these traditionsand the theology they studied in the classroom.
36 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 13: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
At the time of Hillâs tenure at Lincoln most of the faculty were eitherPresbyterian clergymen or laymen, many of whom had trained at Prince-ton. The seminaryâs orientation was therefore toward a blend of Calvin-ism and religious humanism. If the humanist idea that all men andwomen are equal in the eyes of the Lord formed one pillar of religiouseducation at Lincoln, then the Calvinist doctrine of electionâthe ideathat God has chosen a particular group of people for a particular destinyand that salvation comes through grace not worksâformed the other.This doctrine of election and salvation not only conformed to the uni-versityâs missionary outlook; it also offered a religious justiâčcation for thenotion of a talented tenth that would go forth and uplift the race.
Hill imbibed this spirit as he worked out his own political theology.At its heart, this theology can best be thought of in terms of the âevan-gelical liberalismâ constructed by âserious Christiansâ searching for atheology that could be believed and embraced by âintelligent moderns.âThis evangelical liberalism was both Christ-centric and biblically based.It was Christ-centric to the degree that it expressed the essential featuresof Christianityâthe person and work of Jesus Christ as saviorâin termssuitable to a modern world plagued with the social sins of racism andexploitation. And it was biblically based insofar as the scriptural teach-ings were accepted because of their intrinsic worth and epistemologicalvalue.33 Even during these years (roughly 1914 to 1918), glimmers ofHillâs afâčnity for evangelical liberalism can be seen, whether in his vol-unteer service as secretary of the Young Menâs Christian Associationâs(YMCAâs) National War Work Council or in his pursuit of an advancedteaching certiâčcate through the Pennsylvania Sunday School Associa-tion. The Sunday school movement has, after all, always been part of abroader evangelical mission.34
After four years of wrestling with theological concepts inside theclassroom and debating racial politics with his fellow students afterhours, Hill was prepared to begin his career as a licensed minister. Hismixture of Bible-thumping evangelism and social activism was already inevidence. Selected to give one of the commencement addresses for thegraduation of the class of 1918, Hill chose the provocative title âReli-gion, a Manâs Jobâ (sadly, the text of the speech has not survived). Heand many of his classmates listening that afternoon had forgone militaryserviceâa major expression of Black manhood at the time. But perhapsthey saw themselves as soldiers of a different kind, as young men ableand willing to do the âmanâs jobâ of ministering to the faithful and press-ing the cause of Black rights. Like their counterparts returning from thewar, Hill and his classmates were no doubt inspired by what many took to
EVOLVING FAITH 37
![Page 14: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
be a new and growing African American militancy. During the war, W. E. B. DuBois had echoed the sentiments of many when he advisedBlacks to âclose ranksâ around the country and engage in patriotic, albeitsegregated, service. Now, at warâs end and with segregation unabated, heproclaimed: âWe return. We return from âčghting. We return âčghting.Make way for Democracy! We saved it in France, and by the Great Jehovah,we will save it in the United States of America, or know the reason why.â35
Hill would have surely seen himself as one of DuBoisâs âsoldiers ofdemocracy.â He would have also seen himself as one of the ânewâNegroes. The same generation that would discover ânewnessâ all rounditselfâNew Humanism, New Thought, New Woman, New Criticismâwould also discover a New Negro. As Asa Philip Randolph, then editor ofthe Messenger (billed as the only âradical black socialist magazine inAmericaâ) put it at the time, âThe New Negro arrived on the scene at thesame time of all the other forward, progressive movements.â36 A productof both war and migration, this New Negro was, or so many claimed, nolonger willing to turn the other cheek while his political rights wereignored and trampled, his labor exploited, and his demands for socialequality and social justice mocked. Black Americans, declared AlainLocke some years later, were no longer willing to be âsomething to beargued about, condemned or defended, to be kept down or in his placeor helped up, to be worried with or worried over, harassed or patron-ized, a social bogey or a social burden.â Although this New Negro waspartially the product of artists, intellectuals, and middle-class activists, itwas not without a material basis in the changing everyday lives of largesegments of the African American population.37
The beginning of the âGreat Migrationââfrom rural to urban andSouth to North and Westâwas an important expression of agency andself-determination, as millions of African Americans struck out in searchof better lives for themselves and their children. The scattered outbreaksof anti-Black violence that greeted the appearance of this New Negroâespecially during the Red Summer of 1919âare one indication thatwhite communities across the country felt the need to keep Blacks, newor not, in their (subordinate) places.38 âWhen some of the soldiers camefrom World War I,â Hill recalled, âthey had gotten used to larger privi-leges and so they were making a demand and being pushy.â39 And Hill,who pledged to take up the manâs job of religion during this sickeningwave of anti-Black violence, was in favor of pushiness.
In the midst of the celebration of the New Negro and the concomi-tant racial violence, Hill returned home to Detroit and was ordained inthe Baptist faith. Although Detroit escaped the outbreak of a full-âședged
38 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 15: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
race riot, there were a number of clashes between Blacks and whites,especially during the spring of 1919, as the postwar recession led to amore competitive job market. Periodic violence at the factory gates, par-ticularly when Black workers were used as strikebreakers and scabs, alsohelped to keep racial tension high. Moreover, the bombing of homes asa means of forcing Blacks out of previously integrated neighborhoodsand preventing new arrivals, which had begun as early as 1917, becamefrequent by 1920.40 But Hill returned not only to a city of increasingracial tensions and violence. He also returned to his motherâs Jay Streethouse and one of the churches, Second Baptist, that had provided himwith a spiritual home. Accepting a position as assistant pastor, Hillbeneâčted from a familiarity with the congregationâs older members thatcame from his being a former member and Sunday school superinten-dent. Less familiar were the churchâs newcomersâthe steady âșow ofBlack southern migrants who had been arriving in the city since thebeginning of World War I.
Detroit had become one of the leading destinations for Black work-ers migrating out of the South in search of work. Between twenty-âčveand thirty-âčve thousand African American migrants took up residencethere in 1916 and 1917 alone, meaning, remarkably, that the majority ofthe cityâs Black populationâwhich numbered over forty thousand in1920âhad arrived in that one year. A second wave of migration in 1924and 1925 brought an additional forty thousand men, women, and chil-dren. By 1926, 85 percent of Detroitâs Black population had arrived injust one decade. At the same time, the cityâs total population also dou-bled, making it the fourth-largest city in America by 1920.41
While astonishing in their own right, these numbers fail to reveal theenergy and hope, as well as the misery and despair, that gripped thecityâs residents in the immediate postâWorld War I period. For some,there was a sense that the city was on the move. New industries, especiallythe automotive industry, were in a period of intense growth. But for oth-ersâespecially the majority of the cityâs southern migrants, both Blackand whiteâthe âpromised landâ turned out to be a hell of poverty andsocial dislocation. Many Black migrants watched their dreams slowly diein the thirty-four crowded city blocks that comprised Paradise Valley, theold Italian east-side enclave where the vast majority of the Black popula-tion was conâčned from the 1920s to the 1940s.
Under the pastorate of Rev. Robert Bradby, Second Baptist had wel-comed these troubled newcomers from the start. From 1915 to 1920alone, over nine hundred new members were added to the churchâsrolls. Hill owed his position as assistant pastor in charge of charity and
EVOLVING FAITH 39
![Page 16: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
educational programs to the inâșux. Given that so many Black southernmigrants were Baptist, the church automatically beneâčted from theincrease. But Bradby was also dedicated to outreach. In 1917 he set up asystem of committees to meet the trains arriving at Michigan Central Sta-tion with offers of housing and employment assistance. As an assistantpastor, Hill was thrown into the thick of the Black communityâs social cri-sis, where housing and jobs were the most pressing concerns.
The district on the cityâs lower east side that young Charles hadexplored as a teenager was now bursting at the seams. In 1918, twelve toâčfteen thousand African American residents were crowded into threesquare miles that had previously housed half that number. Although anumber of other, smaller districts had been developed, the high-rent,poverty-ridden east side would remain the cityâs chief point of entry formigrants for decades. Excessive rents (as much as 50 to 60 percenthigher than what whites and white ethnics were paying in other parts ofthe city), coupled with lower-paying, unskilled jobs, posed enormousdifâčculties for southern migrants.
One of Hillâs duties was to assist new migrants in âčnding adequatehousing and decent jobs. While the assistant pastor no doubt consideredthis part of the manâs job of religion in action, it was actually a job inwhich women, most notably the churchâs Big Sister auxiliary, played thedominant role. In less than four years, this group of one hundredwomen had recruited hundreds of volunteers, raised over âčve thousanddollars, and founded a home for young women that was to stand âas abeacon-light for the protection of our girls.â42 The women of SecondBaptist, along with other churchwomen and club women in the city,expended thousands of hours in charity work, organizing groups andsocieties to tend to the needs of Black southern migrants.
Second Baptist was thus a prominent place for a young, newlyordained minister to begin his career. Founded in 1836 after the FirstBaptist congregation split over allowing its Black congregants to vote inchurch matters, Second Baptist is the oldest Black church not only inDetroit but in the entire state. Second Baptist has a long and proud his-tory of going beyond the spiritual needs of the congregation and extend-ing itself into politics and social life. The church was a stop on theUnderground Railroad (one can still see the basement rooms used tohide fugitive slaves) and hosted Frederick Douglass and John Brown.
Reverend Bradby was a distinguished leader of this important institu-tion. Born into poverty in a rural area outside Chatham, Ontario (a back-ground that might explain his tremendous sympathy for southernmigrants), Bradby was schooled at McMaster University, a Baptist Col-
40 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 17: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
lege and Seminary in Toronto. Before accepting the pastorate at SecondBaptist in 1910, he had served congregations in Amherstburg and Wind-sor, Ontario, and Toledo, Ohio.43 A self-made man and prominent reli-gious leader, Bradby was a good role model for the young minister Hill.
Hill did not remain in the position for long, however. In 1920 hemarried Georgia Roberta Underwood, the daughter of a Seventh DayAdventist minister. Born in Longsport, Indiana, Georgia had lost bothparents by the age of ten and was sent to live with an aunt in Ann Arbor,Michigan, where she met Hill at a convention of Sunday school teachersand administrators. Georgia Underwood Hill was a deeply religious con-vert to the Baptist faith. As a young woman she had once vowed that shewould never be a ministerâs wife and would never live in Detroit. Never-theless, she married Hill and moved into his motherâs Jay Street houseduring the early years of their marriage. She recalled these years as hardbut happy. As a proâčle in the Michigan Chronicle reports, âThere was atime when she baked cookies and cakes to supplement her husbandâssalary. They made it a family project, and everyone was happy doing it.âThe familyâGeorgia, Reverend Hill, and his motherâwere also amongthe âčrst to take an active interest in selling Black newspapers, especiallythe Detroit Courier. Mother Hill would continue to sell the paper well intoold age.44
Such measures were necessary because in 1920 Hill had also takenon the pastorate of his own congregation with a modest salary. His newchurch, Hartford Avenue Baptist (at the corner of Hartford and MilfordStreets), was, in 1920, little more than a wooden shack. Organized in1917 by Second Baptist, the church was an urban outpost located acrossWoodward Avenueâa neighborhood into which Blacks were slowlybeginning to âșow. These âwest siders,â who no longer wished to traveleast of Woodward (the broad avenue that once served as the cityâs racialdivider), solicited the aid of Reverend Bradby and Second BaptistââtheMother of Hartfordââfor help in establishing their own congregation.Originally known as the Institutional Baptist Church, Hartfordâs earlymembership was âmade up of people of all faiths for this was the âčrstchurch in the areaâ and was âčrst pastored by Rev. E. W. Edwards, whosesalary was paid in part by the Detroit Baptist Union and Second Baptist.45
In many ways, Hartford was part of Bradby and Second Baptistâs uplifteffort, but it was Hill who made Hartford his own. He aspired, he oncesaid, to make Hartford âa haven of spiritual resources for all the contin-gencies of life.â46
Sadly, less than a year after the Hills were married their âčrst child,Lucia, died within a week of her birth. Some eleven months later, how-
EVOLVING FAITH 41
![Page 18: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ever, Charles Jr. was born, followed âčfteen months later by GeorgiaRoberta. Within the next several years, Wesley, Lovica, Bermecia, Sylvia,Brent, and Lantz Hill were added to the clan. And as Hillâs family con-tinued to grow, so, too, did his church. From a membership of thirty-âčvein 1920, Hartford grew by 1926 to one of the ten largest Black churchesin the city, with a membership of over twelve hundred. In part, thisimpressive growth can be linked to the inâșux of southern migrants intothe neighborhood, as well as to relationship between Hartford and Sec-ond Baptist, but part of the explanation also lies in Hillâs quiet charismaand his dedication to outreach and service.
Hill initiated an ambitious building project while Georgia came torelish her role as ââčrst ladyâ of Hartford. She was a founding member ofthe Ladies Aid Society, served on the Womenâs Day Committee, and wasa steady and digniâčed presence at most social functions. Once their chil-dren were a bit older, she extended her sphere of social involvement,serving on the board of the Lucy Thurman branch of the YoungWomenâs Christian Association (YWCA). She also became an avid âclubwoman.â Indeed, her extensive range of memberships led her childrento joke that if she did not have a club to join for a particular purposethen she would surely invent one. And she did help to invent them. Overthe years of her marriage, Georgia Hill assisted in organizing the Abaten-jwa Club (for Detroit ministersâ wives), the Interdenominational WivesOrganization, and the Baptist Ministersâ Wives Association.47 Through-out the 1920s, both husband and wife poured their energies into churchand family. While forced to live with Hillâs mother to make ends meet,the family was still better off than the majority of the churchâs members.
When the Ford Motor Company shut down its plants in 1927 becauseof a model change, thousands of African American men were suddenlycast out of work, increasing the hardships suffered by workers and theirfamiliesâmany of whom were still reeling from the economic recessionof 1920â21. Hartfordâs resources for coping with this disaster wereminuscule compared to Second Baptistâs, but Hill strove to âčnd ways tolessen the hardships faced by his congregants, not only through the wordof God and weekly spiritual communion but also through various formsof cooperative economics. He urged his congregants not to stay awayfrom the church just because they didnât have money. Operating underthe belief that God helps those who help themselves, the church heldcoal drives and arranged for the distribution of day-old bread fromDetroitâs Awrey Bakery. Although Hill stolidly refused âfavorsâ from pow-erful âoutside sources,â Hartford also had some success in running itsown small employment agency.48
42 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 19: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
But life was not all work and struggle. Reverend Hill saw to it that thechurch held dances and social forums, especially for young people, andhe often organized the churchâs athletic programs himself. He had beenan avid volleyball player while at Lincoln and even did some traveling onthe Black volleyball circuit; he was always willing to get a game up. Dur-ing these years and throughout the Depression, Hill would also makepancakes every Saturday for his children and their many friends. Hiseldest son remembers that the operation required at least two massivebags of âșour and a good deal of coordination. Reverend Hill also madehis own syrupâwhich calls to mind his late-night forays into the orphan-age cellar.49
Hill and family also valued more restful types of recreation. Everysummer they spent at least two weeks at various lakefront spots, wherethey would slow down, commune with nature, and take stock of theirlives. Initially these family vacations were based in Mackinac City, at thevery northern tip of Michiganâs Lower Peninsula, where other Black fam-ilies were few and far between. While the Hill family escaped the hustleand bustle of city life during these outings, they did not escape racialprejudice and de facto segregation. Indeed, Hillâs children still recountstories of their summer experiences with racismânot being allowed incertain hotels, restaurants, and, signiâčcantly, certain white churches.Still, church services were mandatory. When they could âčnd nowhereelse, the family held its own private services presided over by ReverendHill.
The family eventually saved enough money to secure the purchase ofa piece of land in Harbor Beach, Michigan, in 1951, which they chris-tened Cha-Hill-Gia, an odd amalgamation of their names. The actualpurchase was accompanied by racial indignitiesâa white friend had toclose the deal on Hillâs behalfâbut the lakefront site became a personalretreat for Hill, his family, and, on numerous occasions, friends andmembers of his congregation.
Harbor Beach was also the birthplace and hometown of Frank Mur-phy, whose famed career intersected with Hillâs and many of thosewithin the cityâs Left at numerous points. Murphy was rising during thisperiod from a liberal Recorderâs Court judge in Detroit to the cityâsmayor throughout the Depression, and then later to governor andSupreme Court justice.50 The town of Harbor Beach, however, was notalways as liberal and fair-minded as its favorite son. Georgia Hill recalledthat when the family âčrst arrived âwe noticed that they seemed to resentus. Even when I would go to the drugstore, they always gave us what wewanted, but it seemed as if they didnât want to touch our hands.â
EVOLVING FAITH 43
![Page 20: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Undaunted, the Hills continued to make friendly overtures, and the ten-sions gradually subsided or were at least pushed below the surface.Revealing her own class predispositions (attitudes that she shared withher husband), Georgia Hill continued: âWeâd get a little odd feeling, butafterward they found out that we dressed as well as they dressed and weate the same food, and our place looked as nice as theirs and better.â51
Owning their own home in Detroit and a lakefront summer cottagefar outside the conâčnes of the city were still years away for the Hill fam-ily. By the late 1920s, however, Hillâs life was good. He had his ownchurch, a growing family, and a solid reputation within the Black com-munity. Approaching his late twenties, he was in good health and well onhis way to achieving middle-class standing. To all of these blessings hewould add the harsh realities of political struggle.
WHAT KIND OF ACTIVISM?
The details of Charles Hillâs political development are a bit fuzzy, butsome basic observations can be made from the evidence. It is clear, forexample, that throughout the 1920s, as Hill worked to build his churchand enlarge his congregation, he was still negotiating his class identity.On the one hand, his educational pursuits suggest aspirations to becomea solid citizen and a member of the Black middle class like his absentfather, Edward Hill. On the other, he must have retained some loyaltiesto the working-class life of his mother, Mary, who continued to work atthe various odd jobs that had âčnanced her sonâs education until, in theearly 1940s, a leg injury failed to heal properly.
Happily, the church provided a perfect opportunity for Hill to recon-cile these two aspects of his identity. Hartfordâs decidedly working-classcharacter allowed the young pastor to satisfy his aspirations for middle-class respectability without betraying his loyalty and sense of belonging tothe class of his birth and childhood. To this end, Hill infused every aspectof Hartford with an ethos of service. Moreover, the church provided him,as it had so many others, with a fast track into politics. As one closeobserver put it, âFor answersâfor salvationâpeople turned to thechurch and politics. In many cases, the two were symbiotic. Every pastorhad a political position, and every address had multiple purposes.â52
At this point in his career, Hillâs political outlook did not place himtoo far outside the mainstream of the Black middle class and the cityâsBlack clergy, most of whom seemed to accept the prevailing ideology ofracial uplift. The idea of an educated elite responsible for âlifting as theyclimbedâ and providing services to their less fortunate brothers and sis-
44 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 21: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ters was, after all, entirely consistent with the tenor of his education atLincoln and his prior experiences within Black religious communitiessuch as Bethel and Second Baptist. Hill, who maintained the habit ofwearing crisp white shirts, would most likely have approved of such ini-tiatives as the âDress Well Club,â which stressed the necessity of properattire and deportment in public. Outside the church, but within thisideological framework, Hill worked with the local YMCA and maintaineda membership in Detroitâs NAACP chapter. The former seemed to satisfyhis continuing interests in Christian education, while the latter probablyspoke to his interests in the law, social justice, and integration.
Hill was a mighty proponent of integrationâso much so that hemade a habit of welcoming whites into his church. This upset some ofthe Black congregants. There is an old joke that eleven oâclock Sundaymorning is the most segregated hour in America. Some wanted to keepit that way. âI remember when I âčrst took the church,â Hill remarked, âatany time when a white citizen came in, theyâd [his congregants] ask whatbusiness they had here. Why didnât they go to their own churches?â Hischaracteristic response was to chastise his congregants for their âblackchauvinism,â which was, according to Hill, was âas bad as its white coun-terpart.â53 Given his long-standing commitment to integration on all lev-els of society, he began working with the local NAACP while he was stillan apprentice to attorney William Patrick.
Working with Patrick, Hill had aided in the preparation of the four-teen lawsuits that the Detroit branch had brought against local moviehouses and theaters, which conâčned Blacks to speciâčc sections or barredthem altogether. He also had the opportunity to participate in a vigorousNAACP campaign against a state bill outlawing interracial marriage.54
The local NAACP attracted further national attention in the wake of itssuccessful handling of the 1926 Ossian Sweet case. Sweet was an AfricanAmerican dentist indicted for murdering a member of a white mob thathad threatened his family while it was moving into a previously all-whiteneighborhood. Clarence Darrowâs defense work on behalf of theNAACP and the Sweet family made this an especially high-proâčle trial.55
For Hill, who had begun to contemplate moving his own family into apredominantly white neighborhood on the cityâs west side in order to becloser to his church, the Sweet case must have touched not only a politi-cal nerve but personal one as well. His attention to the case is evident inthe many updates and pleas for âčnancial assistance that he inserted intohis Sunday sermons. In 1945 he did purchase a home on the west side onWest Grand Boulevard. As with the purchase of the lakefront property, awhite friend closed the deal on his behalf.56
EVOLVING FAITH 45
![Page 22: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Throughout the 1920s, Hill hovered on the periphery of both theNAACP and the YMCA leadership. Whether by choice or circumstance,he was not admitted into the upper echelon of common leadershipthat linked the NAACP and the Detroit Urban League with inâșuentialBlack churches, newspapers, and other high-proâčle community orga-nizations such as Dunbar Hospital. Reverend Bradby of Second Baptistand Rev. John Bagnall of St. Matthewâs Episcopal, for instance, workedclosely with the DUL, and were contributing editors of the Black-runDetroit Tribune; over the years both served as president of the DetroitNAACP, with Bagnall moving on to the national ofâčce as director ofbranches. Another former president of the Detroit NAACP, WilliamOsby, was a member of the DUL Board, a trustee at Dunbar Hospital,and a trustee at Second Baptist. John Dancy, head of the Detroit UrbanLeague, had ties to at least six different race-improvement agenciesand organizations, including the state Negro Welfare Bureau, AlphaPhi Alpha fraternity, the YMCA, and the Detroit Federation of Settle-ments. Along with Reverend Bradby, he also maintained a close con-nection with the Detroit Council of Churches (DCC). While Hill asso-ciated with these menâsome of whom were, like Hill himself,members of the Masonsâhe was not yet their social or politicalequal.57
Nor is there much evidence to suggest that Hill was willing, at least inthe 1920s, to join those who challenged the power of these men andtheir organizations. J. H. Porterâs Good Citizenship League (GCL), forexample, which was incorporated in 1918, complained that the politicalelites associated with the DUL were âpolitical bumsâ willing to sell theirsouls to the devil in their negotiations with the white establishment.58
Moreover, they charged that the Urban League unduly limited thesphere of Black representation. âWe are tired of picked leaders,â theGCL stated in a 1921 pamphlet.
We havenât a man in Detroit that the masses of colored people canpoint to and really trust as a leader. Negro ministers and other wor-thy citizens canât reach the Civic Boards now on account of theUrban League, being the accepted channel through which all mat-ters pertaining to Negro welfare must pass. As far as we have beenable to learn, every application for aid of any kind, worthy or unwor-thy, that has been presented to the Board of Charity, during the lastyear or more, has died in the ofâčce of the Urban League, the appli-cation seldom receiving a reply.59
46 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 23: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
For all of its outspokenness, the Good Citizenship League neverachieved a mass base. Foreshadowing the anticommunist tirades thathampered the effectiveness of Black militant groups in the 1940s and1950s, the DUL dismissed the GCL as a tiny group of âcrabby, muddle-headed near reds.â The group was virtually destroyed when police raideda league memberâs home ofâčce and arrested Porter and the groupâs sec-retary, Mary E. Jones, for distributing âinâșammatory materialsâ in1927.60
A much stronger challenge to the DUL-aligned Black elite camefrom Jamaican-born Marcus Garvey, who urged the thousands of Detroitmembers of his Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA) tocease their subservience to the âmodern Uncle Toms seeking the shelter,leadership, protection and patronage of the âmasterâ in their organiza-tion and their so-called advancement work.â61 The Detroit Division ofthe UNIA was founded in 1920 by a minister, A. D. Williams, whoattended a UNIA convention in New York and returned home âwith ared, black, and green âșagâ and a passion for the principles and practicesof the organization. With the guidance of F. Levi Lord, a native of Bar-bados, who accepted the assignment of creating the Detroit branch, thedivision grew rapidly. It purchased a building, Liberty Hall, at 1516 Rus-sell Street, bought stock in the Black Star Line, established drugstores,shoeshine parlors, restaurants, theaters, and a gas station, while alsodeveloping a range of internal participatory groupsâthe Black CrossNurses, the Motor Corps, and so forthâthat were typical of the UNIAoverall.62
The interracially minded Reverend Hill would have found Garveyâsbrand of âracial chauvinismâ unappealing. Yet the local chapter of theUNIA gained a large following in the city, especially among women.Their meetings and marches attracted upward of âčfteen thousand menand women during the early 1920s. Ruth Smith, who migrated with herparents from Gadsen, Alabama, has fond memories of growing up withinthe organization. âMy mother carried all of the girls into the UNIA so Iwas a member at a very young age,â she recalls. âInstead of going tochurch on Sunday, we would get up early and go to the Detroit divisionof the UNIA, diligently every Sunday.â A member of the Womenâs MotorCorps, she reminisced in a 1975 interview about large parades throughthe streets of the city and the extent to which âmy life, my idealsârevolved around the local UNIA. She even met and married her husbandthrough the organization.63
Smithâs experiences are not unique. At its height the Detroit Division
EVOLVING FAITH 47
![Page 24: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
had at least four thousand members, the majority of whom wereemployed in the plants, and a paid staff that included a president, twosecretaries, and a janitor.64 The division also attracted a number of Blackmiddle-class businessmen and professionals, including attorney AlonzoPettiford, who served as president in the early 1920s; J. Milton Van Lowe,legal counsel for the division and also a member of Bethel AME; andCharles Diggs, who served as the director of the board of trustees.65 Yearslater, Diggs, an undertaker by profession, would go on to play a leadingrole in the cityâs civil rights community as a Democratic state senator.Along with fellow UNIA member Joseph A. Craigen, an immigrant fromBritish Guiana who was appointed in 1937 to the Michigan WorkmenâsCompensation Commission by Governor Frank Murphy, Diggs helped toestablish Democrat Clubs as an alternative to the power of the Republi-can Party in Black Detroit.
Like the members of the Good Citizenship League, local Garveyites,and in some cases Garvey himself, directly attacked the common leader-ship provided by the Black elite but not because it blocked access towhite philanthropy. For Garvey, the problem with groups such as theNAACP and the Urban Leagueâwhether in New York or Detroitâwasnot only that they were dominated by integrationists and light-skinnedBlacks but also that they were not sufâčciently self-reliant and dedicatedto the promotion of economic nationalism. He claimed, for instance,that Reverend Bagnall, the pastor of St. Matthewâs, refused to allow dark-skinned Blacks to join his church. In an exchange of insults typical ofGarveyâs interactions with the Black elite in the United States, Bagnall,who was still new to his position in the national ofâčce of the NAACP,denounced Garvey as a âJamaican Negro of unmixed stock, squat, stocky. . . with protruding jaws . . and rather bull-dog-like face. . . . Boastful,egotistical, tyrannical, intolerant, cunning, shifty, smooth and suave . . .gifted at self-advertisement, without shame in self-laudation . . . a lover ofpomp and tawdry âčnery and garish display, a bully with his own folk butservile in the presence of the Klan, a sheer opportunist and a demagogiccharlatan.â66
Even though the local UNIA lost much of its momentum after Gar-veyâs deportation in the late 1920s, the organizationâs inâșuence contin-ued to shape later developments in the city, from the establishment ofthe Nation of Islam during the Depression (Elijah Mohammad, nĂ© ElijahPoole, was a member of the Detroit UNIA) to, arguably, the Rev. AlbertB. Cleageâs Shrine of the Black Madonna and the Black Christian nation-alism movement.67 Some, such as John Charles Zampty, a loyal memberof the Detroit Division from the 1920s through the 1970s, became living
48 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 25: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
links between these two eras of Black religious nationalism. In fact, thesimilarities between Garveyism with its African Orthodox Church (AOC)and Cleageâs Black Christian nationalism are striking, especially theircommon belief in a Black God. Why, Garvey asked in a 1924 UNIA con-vention speech, is God white? âIf God be our Father, and we bear Hisimage and likeness, why should we not teach our children that theirFather in Heaven resembles them even as they do Him?â Linking thequestion to racism and power, he continued: âWhy should we permit theCaucasians to constantly and indelibly impress upon their youthfulminds that God is white?â âNo longer,â he concluded, âmust we permitwhite religious âpastors and astersâ to hold us in spiritual serfdom andtutelage.â68
While Garvey himself was often critical of ministers who regardedthemselves as âso-called leaders of the raceâ and reserved special scornfor those who preached a delayed and otherworldly belief in divine jus-tice, he nonetheless understood and built on the indigenous faith ofBlack folk. His own expression of faith tended toward the ethical and thepragmatic. âI would rather stand alone,â Garvey once wrote, âand beframed for the prison a thousand times than deny the [Black] religion ofmy motherâmark you, not the [white] religionâthe religion thattaught me to be honest and fair to all my fellowmen.â69 Under the ban-ner of âOne God, One Aim, One Destiny,â Garveyism encouraged its fol-lowers to see the One God, in whose image we are created, as Black. Fur-ther, members of the African Orthodox Church, the movementâs ofâčcialreligious institution, were urged to âerase the white gods from yourhearts . . . [and] go back to the native church, to our own true God.â Ata session of the fourth international convention, AOC bishop George A.McGuire also advised the audience to âname the day when all membersof the race would tear down and burn all the pictures of the whiteMadonna and Child, and replace them with a black Madonna andChild.â Thus, although careful not to offend Muslims and non-Chris-tians, Garveyites effectively placed Christianity within a Black nationalistframework that advocated separatism from the United States and theredemption of Africaâas âEthiopia shall arise and stretch forth herhands onto Godââfrom European colonial domination.70
None of this would have resonated with Reverend Hill, especially theidea that God could be Black or any other color. Hillâs scattered state-ments on Black nationalism, made in the 1960s, were always derogatory,and his staunch commitment to interracialism suggests that he wouldhave been uncomfortable with aspects of the nationalistsâ Afrocentrictheology. Or perhaps he would have agreed with the assessment of Ruth
EVOLVING FAITH 49
![Page 26: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Smith, who observed that âyears ago you had to join the UNIA or theNAACP.â71 At this point in his political career, Hill chose the latter.
Hillâs own challenge to the Black political elite would come later, ashis activism began to focus on the working class. His movement from amainstream thinker on the margins of the elite to a militant religiousactivist aligned with workers had as much to do with his identity as a min-ister and the Black son of a white working-class mother as it did withDepression era changes in Detroitâs political geography. The power ofthe Black elite, that is to say, was weakened not by the admonishments ofGarveyites and groups such as the Good Citizenship League; instead, itwas weakened by social forces arising out of the Depression, whichopened up new opportunities for members of the working classes andmiddle-class supporters such as Hill.
THE DEPRESSION YEARS
The Great Depression plunged Detroit and its Black community into apit of despair; but it also, ironically, allowed the emergence of a working-class politics. The city as a whole suffered the highest jobless rate in thecountry, and many of the businesses that did not fold were forced toimplement massive layoffs. The Ford Motor Company, which hademployed 128,000 people in March 1929, had only 37,000 left on itspayroll in August 1931. By then 210,000 people were on city relief. Andthey were the âluckyâ ones, the âdeserving poor,â able to take advantageof the cityâs limited relief programs. With 46 percent of the workforce inMichigan unemployed by 1933, conditions were becoming increasinglydesperate, particularly in African American communities, where unem-ployment reached as high as 80 percent.72 One result was that estab-lished race improvement organizations such as the NAACP and DULand churches such as Second Baptist were severely constrained by âčnan-cial difâčculties precisely when their help was most needed.
Back in 1918 the Detroit Urban League had placed over ten thou-sand Blacks in jobs. By June of 1931, when the Employersâ Association ofDetroit, the leagueâs primary source of funding, withdrew its support,John Dancy noted that the groupâs effectiveness had been severely cur-tailed. By 1933 the DUL only maintained two full-time employees. TheNAACP suffered a similar fate. Between 1930 and 1934 the nationalofâčceâs operating budget dropped from sixty to thirty-eight thousanddollars. Many Black Detroiters were simply unable to pay dues and sup-port NAACP activities; as early as 1930 the Detroit branch had ceased allregular meetings. Finally, as one author notes, âthe black churches, in
50 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 27: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
the main, were either âčnancially unable, or philosophically unwilling toassert any meaningful leadership in the black community to deal withmass unemployment.â73 In fact, as a poll conducted by the BaltimoreAfro-American bears out, most Black ministers refused to call on theirchurches to confront pressing economic struggles. Seventy-âčve percentof their sermons dealt with âthe other world and the rewards of heavenâwhile only twenty-âčve percent focused on âhow Christianity could beapplied to the economic problems of everyday life.â74
New groups began to âčll the gap left by these churches and tradi-tional race improvement organizations, all of which had depended tosome degree on white philanthropy. In Black Detroit the new organiza-tions spanned the ideological spectrum. Hill worked with three in par-ticular: the Booker T. Washington Trade Association (BTWTA) and theafâčliated Housewivesâ League, the Civic Rights Committee, and theloose collective of groups and councils associated with the CommunistParty. They are therefore useful for tracing the evolution of his interestin social, political, and economic issues during the 1930s. More impor-tant, they are also representative of the different ways in which varioussegments of the cityâs African American community attempted to makea better life.
The Booker T. Washington Trade Association was organized in 1930by the Rev. William Peck. A graduate of the Oberlin College seminary,Peck came to Detroit in 1930 to take over the pastorate of Bethel AME,one of the churches that Hill had frequented in his youth. Soon after hisarrival, Reverend Peck called together a group of Black businessmen andprofessionals, including Hill, in order to discuss the situation in Detroitand to seek ways of addressing the communityâs hardships. As a result ofthese initial meetings, the BTWTA was formed to encourage the patron-age of existing Black businesses and support the development of newones. This was also the mission of the Housewivesâ League, which wasfounded as a sister organization by Reverend Peckâs wife, Fannie.75
In keeping with the social philosophy of its namesake (not to men-tionâand few didâthe mission of Marcus Garvey and the UNIA as well),the BTWTA and the Housewivesâ League were rooted in the premisethat âonly through the development of black business and industry willthe race gain its economic freedom.â Although ministers and their wivesplayed a role in the groupsâ founding, the BTWTA and the HousewivesâLeague were not religiously oriented, nor were they particularly involvedin organized political activism. Indeed, the BTWTA was quick to pointout that it was ânot an organization which seeks to right the many injus-tices we have forced upon us or as a result of discrimination within the
EVOLVING FAITH 51
![Page 28: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
âčeld of civil and property rights.â76 But within their self-proscribedsphere both groups were relatively successful. The BTWTA organizedtwo Black merchant clubs that met twice weekly to discuss the state ofBlack business in the city and offer mutual support. It also organized sev-eral well-attended trade exhibits and established a trade school. By theend of the Depression, the Housewivesâ League, which canvassed Blackneighborhoods on behalf of Black establishments, was widely creditedwith aiding Black merchants.
Other groups took a more confrontational approach to the problemsconfronting the cityâs African American community in the early 1930s.The Civic Rights Committee, founded in 1933 by Snow Grigsby, wasmore vocal and militant in its efforts to secure economic justice. Insteadof focusing on the development of Black business, the committeeattacked discriminatory hiring practices in the public sector. Grigsby, aBlack postal worker who moved to Detroit from Chatsville, South Car-olina, in 1920, considered the local NAACP leaders âdilatory in theiractivity,â and set out to form a political association that was able and will-ing to adopt a more forceful position on employment discrimination.77
Like the BTWTA and the Housewivesâ League, the Civic Rights Commit-tee was not a religious organization, but it was intimately tied to theBlack church. A number of ministers supported Grigsbyâs work andallowed him to use their facilities for meetings, and Grigsby himself wasa deeply spiritual man who wrote and lectured on religious themes,insisting that churches become a more responsible and forthright agentfor social change. As historian Victoria Walcott notes, however, Grigsbyadopted a condescending attitude toward the hundreds of small store-front churches dotting the streets of the cityâs Black neighborhoods,whose preachers Grigsby, like many within the Black elite, regarded asâparasitesâ and practitioners of a âbootleggers religion.â78
The reasons for Grigsbyâs dismissive attitude toward these small,often charismatic and Pentecostal churches stemmed as much from hisactivist vision of Christianity as from his unwillingness to see the spiritualbeauty or social security and solace provided in the storefronts. InâChristianity and Race Relations,â a speech originally delivered at thePeopleâs Church in East Lansing, Michigan, and reprinted in Grigsbyâs1937 volume White Hypocrisy and Black Lethargy, he surveyed a range ofpeople on how they deâčned Christianity. Most respondents he foundwanting. âI believe that Christianity should be deâčned as an inward incli-nation which compels one, of his own initiative, to give equal opportu-nity to all men,â he wrote, noting that the way the religion was practicedat the time was often âa joke and hypocritical in the superlative degree.â
52 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 29: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Grigsby, who was a member and later an elder and trustee of St. JohnâsUnited Presbyterian, focused almost exclusively on the ethical dimen-sions of faith and creed. Chiding Christianity as âthe only religion thatdraws the color lineâ and arguing that Blacks had become increasinglydisillusioned by the âdifferences between our creeds and our deeds,â heurged that a more authentic practice be brought to Detroit.79
âOur articles of religion speak of the original sin of Adam,â Grigsbycontinues, in a language reminiscent of Walter Rauschenbuschâs, âbutvery little is said of the modern sins of Adamâs white offspring.
They say nothing of the high rentals built up by white Christian land-lords, dilapidated houses; nothing of the unsanitary conditions ofour city where the black brother is forced to live. . . . It is a sin todeprive men of an opportunity for their own growth and develop-ment, a sin to hold them down by force, a sin to impede theiradvancement, as well as to hinder them in educating their childrenand securing work to care for their dependents. All racial discrimi-nation is sinful as well as wicked.80
By focusing on the sins of economic injustice, the committee func-tioned as a counterpart to the urban boycott campaignsâthe âDonât BuyWhere You Canât Workâ movementâthat emerged around the sametime in Black communities throughout the nation.
While the BTWTA and the Housewivesâ League occasionally steppedbeyond their limited role as booster organizations to picket stores inBlack neighborhoods that did not hire African Americans, the commit-tee went on the offensive more often. Emphasizing the importance ofresearching his targets, Grigsby spearheaded attacks on the racist hiringpractices of the Detroit Board of Education, the Postal Service, the FireDepartment, and, most impressively, the electric company, Detroit Edi-son.81 When he and the committee discovered that Detroit Edisonemployed only forty African Americans out of a workforce of eight thou-sand, the group paid high school students to go door-to-door collectinglight bills. The committee, joined by groups that included the BTWTAand NAACP, confronted Detroit Edison with evidence of the level ofBlack energy consumption. After a series of negotiations they were suc-cessful in convincing the company to hire more African Americans.
The group used such tactics repeatedly, adopting a two-prongedapproach. First, it generally focused on public employment: hence, theuse of Civic as opposed to Civil in the organizationâs name. Second, it tar-geted the silence of three broad groups within the community, each of
EVOLVING FAITH 53
![Page 30: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
which was represented by one of the three monkeys who see, hear, andspeak no evil, as depicted on the cover of the committeeâs 1933 bookletAn X-Ray Picture of Detroit. The monkeys are labeled âNegro Politician,Urban League, Medical Societyâ; âLocal branch NAACPâ; and âCivic andChristian Leadership.â82
The Reverend Hill participated in the activities of the Civic RightsCommittee almost from the beginning, although he does not seem tohave been among its founding members. When the newly institutedHatch Act, which prohibited federal employees (including postal work-ers) from engaging in âpernicious political activity,â forced Grigsby toleave his position as the groupâs chairman, Hill became the new chair.83
Overall, Hill participated more actively in the committee, which tendedto stage public, community-based forms of protest, than in the BTWTA.His membership in both groups, which was hardly uncommon, suggestsa holistic approach toward Black social advancementâone that incor-porated the concerns of both the emerging middle classes and at leastsome segments of the working classes.
Hillâs activism on behalf of African American industrial workers, whowere well represented in his congregation, took more time to manifestitself in a public way. This was partly a consequence of timing, since therehad been very little organizing among industrial workers before 1935and even less that embraced Black workers. Still, at the same time thatReverend Peck was organizing the BTWTA and Snow Grigsby was form-ing the Civic Rights Committee, Black industrial workers were beginningto organize their own associations. That many of these groups werefounded by African American members of the Communist Party isimportant not only for the political biography of Reverend Hill and thedevelopment of Black radicalism in Detroit but also for the emergenceof the cityâs early civil rights community in general.
A LABORâCIVIL RIGHTS COMMUNITY TAKES SHAPE
The long, hard years of the Depression gave the Communist Party anopportunity to expand its sphere of inâșuence, and it was during theearly 1930s that Hill and hundreds of other Black Detroiters would haveâčrst become aware of the party and its activities. There is little evidenceregarding the precise nature of Hillâs involvement with CP-inspiredgroups during this period. But it is fair to say that he was aware of theevents and organizations that gradually drew segments of the Black com-munity and the CP closer together in the early 1930s. These years were,in effect, foundational ones for the groups and individuals who would
54 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 31: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Cover from Snow F. Grigsbyâs An X-Ray Picture of Detroit, 1933. (Michigan Histor-ical Collections. Courtesy of the Bentley Historical Library, University of Michi-gan.)
![Page 32: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
come to align themselves with the cityâs civil rights community after1935. A few such groupsâthe Auto Workers Union (AWU), the Leagueof Struggle for Negro Rights, the Unemployed Councils, and the Inter-national Labor Defense (ILD)âwere particularly important.
In spite of its small numbers, the CP, having wrested control of theAuto Workers Union from the Socialist Party, did make signiâčcantattempts between 1924 and 1930 to spread the gospel of interracialunionism. Along with appeals to the foreign born, women, and youngworkers, the AWU also made a special appeal to Black workers, advocat-ing âequal pay for equal workâ regardless of race and insisting that âAllworkers must get togetherâmen, women, young workers, all nationali-ties, all races, for their own protection.â84 Throughout the 1920s the CPand the AWU achieved their greatest success in recruiting white ethnics,especially Slavs. A few African Americans joined as well, most notablyJoseph Billups, the son of a Mississippi preacher, and Walter Hardinâboth of whom had earlier been members of the defunct (but not forgot-ten) Industrial Workers of the World or Wobbliesâas well as Alabama-born Paul Kirk, another ministerâs son, and William Nowell, who ran forCongress in 1930 on the Communist Party ticket. The activities of thesemen within and for the CP were shaped, to some extent, by a change inpolicy on the âNegro questionâ in 1928. Instead of working (or âbor-ingâ) within preexisting organizations such as the NAACP, the new pol-icy called for the creation of parallel revolutionary groups. The party,like Garveyâs UNIA, now viewed Blacks as an oppressed nation andadopted a program of âSelf-Determination for Negroes in the BlackBelt.â85
This so-called Third-Period (1928â34) policy coincided with achange in the local CP leadership following the election of Phil Ray-mond as general secretary of the Detroit branch and, by extension, ashead of the AWU. Under Raymondâs direction the AWU evolved fromâan independent and apolitical union into the nucleus of a self-pro-claimed ârevolutionary unionââ afâčliated with the Communist TradeUnion Unity League.86 In the early 1930s, the member organizations inthis union participated in strikes in area plants, including the FisherBody plant in Flint and the Detroit strike wave of 1933. Following the CPline, and in an attempt to unite organizing on the shop âșoor with orga-nizing in the community, Black Communists in Detroit worked withinboth the AWU and the League of Struggle for Negro Rights (LSNR), theorganization that succeeded the American Negro Labor Congress in1930. The LSNR was charged with bringing revolutionary and proto-nationalist ideas to urban centers of Black discontent such as Detroit.
56 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 33: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
When the CP adopted its Popular Front policy in 1935 and replaced itsdual revolutionary strategy with one that called for working in broadcoalitions with liberals, the league disbanded and most of its membersjoined the National Negro Congress.87
Despite these changes in policy and approach, the CPâs visibilityincreased exponentially in the early 1930s in large part because of theopportunities afforded by worsening economic conditions. Indeed,Detroit was an important center of CP activity during these years, andthere is ample evidence that the party was stronger there than in mostother U.S. cities.88 African Americans and others became aware of theparty not so much through its organizing efforts within the plants but asa result of its community organizing efforts among unemployed workersand, most especially, because of its practice of âunevictingâ families.âWhen people were evicted,â recalled Joseph Billups, âwe would placethem back in their houses, and Iâve seen times when we would have fouror âčve evictions in one block.â89 This practice was evidently widespread;since landlords would have to return to court for a new eviction ordereach time it happened, evictions quickly ceased to be cost effective.
To structure these and other activities, Detroit area Communists cre-ated at least âčfteen Unemployed Councils. The councilsâ main goal wasâto convince the jobless they had to overcome ethnic and racial divisionsand unite, and [to] convince people that it was the governmentâs respon-sibility to provide relief.â90 To this end, the CP organized a number ofcouncils along neighborhood lines: one for the HastingsâFerry Streetarea; one along Woodward Avenue north of Grand Circus Park; and alarge one for the east side, where Italian, Jewish, and Eastern Europeanfamilies still lived and the African American enclaves were located. Attheir peak, Detroitâs Unemployed Councilsâwhich were among the âčrstin the nationâwere estimated to possess a combined membership ofalmost thirty thousand. The CP may not have been very successful inencouraging people to overcome their racial and ethnic divisions, but itdid manage, on a number of occasions, to bring diverse groups of peopletogether for mass rallies and demonstrations. Grand Circus Park, in themiddle of the downtown business district, became the prime site forprotests, and Left organizations used it to keep up a running dialogue onthe faults and failures of capitalism. Joseph Billups recalled:
Well, the Unemployed Councils we had used to hold meetings downthere, day and night, in Grand Circus Park. And thatâs where the ideaof unemployment insurance was raised, in Grand Circus Park. âWorkor breadâ was the slogan. . . . Grand Circus Park was full, day and
EVOLVING FAITH 57
![Page 34: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
night, and always there was someone up speaking and it didnât makeany difference at the time, for those fellows, because they didnât haveany place to stay, and they were sleeping in the park.91
Not everyone who joined the Unemployed Councils or participatedin the CP-sponsored rallies was entirely sympathetic to the partyâs ideol-ogy, but a large number of residents were willing to give the CP a fairhearing on the basis of its practical work. When a Ford âgoon squadâ andDearborn police attacked a 1932 hunger march at Fordâs Dearborn,Michigan, plant, killing three marchers (a fourth died later from injuriessustained during the assault), an estimated sixty thousand Detroitersjoined the funeral march to protest what the radical press labeled theâFord Massacre.â Josephine Gomon, the mayorâs secretary, rememberedit as âa very dramatic scene. . . . The paraders marched down WoodwardAvenue behind the four âșag-draped caskets; and as they came, they sangthe Internationale. It was said that 60,000 people marched and the vol-ume of singing could be heard all over the city. It reverberated.â92 Theevent itself reverberated throughout the city and the nation.93
Roger Baldwin, head of the American Civil Liberties Union,denounced Ford and the Dearborn police. The situation, according tothe ACLU, was not so much about communismââor any other âismâââbut about the rights to freedom of expression, assembly, peacefuldemonstration and political thought.94 Baldwin and the ACLU did notagree with local Communists, however, in assigning some of the blame toFrank Murphy, Detroitâs liberal mayor. For the party it was crucial, underthe logic of the Third Period strategy, that workers and the unemployedsee Murphy, the liberal, as a threat as great as Ford, the capitalist. Hencethe banners unfurled along the parade route read âSmash the Ford-Mur-phy Police Terror.â95
For some, such as David Moore, a Black auto worker who was just ateenager at the time of what came to be called the Ford Hunger Marchand its aftermath, the protest was âa turning point in my life. . . . Themore Iâd gotten involved in the Councils, the more I learned about thesystem . . . [and] when I saw the blood âșowing there on Miller Road[near the plant], that was the point I became a radical. From that dayon.â96 Young Christopher Alston, whose family had moved from Floridato Detroit in 1916, was similarly affectedâeven more so since the eigh-teen year old had attended the march with a high school friend, Joe Bus-sell, one of the men killed later that day. Alston joined the party soonafter. From 1933 to 1935 he worked in Harlem, organizing the YoungPeopleâs Progressive League, and in 1936 he went south to organize the
58 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 35: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
All Southern Negro Youth Congress. In 1938, after helping to foundwhat became the Tobacco Stemmersâ and Laborersâ Industrial Union inRichmond, Alston traveled through Virginia, North Carolina, and Ten-nessee, organizing Black workers for the CIO. He returned to Detroitjust in time to get a job at Fordâs River Rouge complex and to begin thelong, hard campaign to organize workers in that massive facility.97
The funeral/mass march was not the end of the hunger marchtragedy. Four days after the massacre, a fourth marcher, Curtis William,a thirty-seven-year-old Black worker, died from injuries sustained duringthe melee. A group of Black organizers led by Joseph Billups requestedthat Williamsâs body be interred alongside those of the other three casu-alties in the (segregated) Woodlawn Cemetery overlooking Fordâs RiverRouge plant. When that request was denied because of the cemeteryâsall-white policy, Billups threatened to bury the body in Grand CircusPark. A group of disgruntled mourners actually gathered with picks andshovels to dig up the pavement in the middle of the cityâs business dis-trict, only to be turned away by city ofâčcialsâall of whom, includingMayor Murphy and other noncommunists, were denounced as âsocialfascists.â In the end, Billups opted for the equally dramatic solution ofhaving the body cremated, renting an airplane, and scattering the ashesover the River Rouge plant.98
As the Depression wore on and the incidents of racial injusticemounted, a number of African American activists, like Alston andMoore, were pulled into the orbit of the cityâs Left and the CommunistParty. Shelton Tappes, a Black worker and future union ofâčcial, recalledthat all the Communist organizers had to do was ârun off handbills andgo up and down the main streets in the Negro community, and whateverthe site of the demonstration was to be, at the time it was to take place,there was usually a considerable crowd there.â To increase its presencein the Black community, the party encouraged its African Americanmembers to organize their own councils, known as Nat Turner Clubs.These groups often held rallies âright in the Negro community,â on andaround Hastings Street.99
The opinions of Black Detroiters tended to reâșect national trends.When the NAACP conducted a poll of the major Black newspapers in1933, it found that most editors agreed with the idea that, while the CPwas far from perfect, the partyâs stance on racial equality put it far inadvance of other predominantly white organizations. As a result, the CPwas making headway among African Americans. âHow, under such cir-cumstances, can we go to war with the Communist Party?â asked theChicago Defender, a Black weekly avidly read in Detroit.
EVOLVING FAITH 59
![Page 36: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Is there any other political, religious, or civic organization in thecountry that would go to such lengths to prove itself not unfriendly tous? We may not agree with the entire program of the CommunistParty, but there is one item with which we do agree wholeheartedlyand that is the zealousness with which it guards the rights of the Race.
This was quite an endorsement. Even the NAACP had to admit a grudg-ing respect for the partyâs race work.100
The CPâs reputation among African Americans was also greatlyenhanced by the work of International Labor Defense, the legal arm ofthe party, and its involvement in the Scottsboro case. âIt aroused theinterest of all Negroes,â remembered Rose Billups. âThere wasnât anyquestion of left, right, or middle. It was a question of save the boys.â101
On March 25, 1931, nine young Black men and two white women whohad been traveling on a southbound freight train were arrested. Themen were subsequently charged with rape. With indecent speed, theywere indicted by an all-white jury, assigned an all-white defense team bya white judge, and convicted and sentenced to death by another all-whitejury. In Alabama, the Scottsboro case was nothing more than anotherlegal lynching; but it was rescued from obscurity by the activism of Com-munists and the ILD. Thanks to their efforts, the U.S. Supreme Courtremanded the case to the state on due process grounds. In 1934, as theILD was preparing for a new trial, the CP called for âa solid front in theâčght for the unconditional freedom of the Scottsboro Boys,â and by1935 other organizations, including the NAACP, church groups, andcivic associations had gotten involved.102
As the case dragged on throughout the decade, moving from thestate courts to higher courts and back again, it came to symbolize thefaults of the American legal system and the collective struggle of AfricanAmericans. Clubs were organized in Detroit, as elsewhere, to support theboys and their defense. The families of the nine young men, along withCommunists such as William Patterson, the Black Central Committeemember in charge of the Scottsboro Defense Fund, came to the city tospeak at large rallies and church forums. Reverend Hill, along with Fr.Malcolm Dade of St. Cyprianâs, were among those who formed the com-mittee that coordinated the defense fundâs activities in Detroit. Theprotest around the case is the âčrst direct mention of Hillâs interactionwith the CP that I have been able to locate. It may also have been one ofhis âčrst public steps toward a radical politics, introducing him to theexpanding ranks of the cityâs Left.103
60 FAITH IN THE C ITY
![Page 37: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The ILD retained the services of Maurice Sugar, a radical lawyer whohad defended most of those indicted for their supposed role in the FordHunger March. Born in 1891 in the Upper Peninsula lumber town ofBrimley, Michigan, where his Lithuanian Jewish parents ran the generalstore, Sugar was a Marxist who believed in struggle âwithin the existinglaw and culture of capitalism while working for socialist change.â He alsobelieved in relating legal work to the overall class struggle and was aprominent supporter of Black rights.104 Through Sugar, the ILD becameinvolved in a number of local cases in which African Americans werewrongfully charged. As a result, Sugar and the ILD were widely recog-nized as leading defenders of persecuted Blacks in the city. In fact, whenSugar ran for a position on the Detroit Recorderâs Court in 1935 he waswarmly received in Black churches and at civic functions. He even wonthe unanimous endorsement of the âčfty-nine-member Detroit MetroBaptist Alliance and the conservative Tribune Independent. Reverend Hillwas a âčrm supporter of Sugarâa fact much noted in Sugarâs Black-directed campaign literatureâand over the years the two men and theirfamilies developed a close friendship. Reverend and Mrs. Hill, forinstance, were annual attendees at Sugarâs Buck Dinner, a fund-raisingevent for radical causes begun in 1929 for which Sugar supplied themain course from his hunting trips.105
In the years to come, Sugar would become a central âčgure inDetroitâs Left community, which was always seeking to increase its ranks.âOverall,â as one student of political radicalism in Detroit has noted, âitcan be argued that Sugarâs Recorderâs Court campaign served as the cat-alyst in the emergence of the black communityâs acceptance of unionsand in opening a window to the left.â106 There was indeed a window cre-ated in the early 1930s and not only by Sugarâs campaign. The organiza-tion of the League of Struggle for Negro Rights, the work of the Unem-ployed Councils, the hunger marches and protest rallies, and the âčght tofree the Scottsboro boys, as well as the work of groups such as the CivicRights Committee, the Booker T. Washington Trade Association, andthe Housewivesâ League, all contributed to the civil rights struggles ofDepression era Detroit. By weakening traditional race improvementassociations that depended on white philanthropy, the social and eco-nomic hardships of the Depression had opened up new spaces for work-ing-class activism. Reverend Hill and others like him began to appreciatethe working classes, the Communist Party, and the need for militant(and interracial and interethnic) collective action as central to theirstruggle for social justice. For (barely) middle-class activists such as Hill,
EVOLVING FAITH 61
![Page 38: EVOLVING FAITH - press.umich.edu](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051922/628555e39c6e9b07da2ddae5/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
the ideology of racial uplift and service did not entirely dissipate.Instead, service was redeâčnedâaway from âservice toâ the working classesand toward a position of âstruggle withâ them.
Hillâs transformation into a religious radical was occasioned by noth-ing as dramatic as the savage beating at the hands of angry whitesendured by Reverend Taylor in Richard Wrightâs âFire and Cloud,â butthe spirit of the transformation was similar. Neither Hill nor the âčctionalTaylor faltered in his faith. Neither developed, that is to say, a particu-larly radical political theology. Both did, however, develop new ideasabout what it means to do the Lordâs work. Thus, by the mid-1930s,when the cityâs civil rights community was taking on a deâčnite shape, theReverend Hill found even greater opportunities to do the âmanâs jobâ ofworking for faith and social change.
62 FAITH IN THE C ITY