evolutionary reasons for sex linkage
DESCRIPTION
Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage. Sexual conflict Predicts initial X-linkage if genes that favor males but harm females are recessive (Rice 1984) Predicts initial Z-linkage when SA genes are dominant Predict no bias once sex-limited Sexual selection: ornament-preference coevolution - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage
• Sexual conflict– Predicts initial X-linkage if genes that favor males but harm
females are recessive (Rice 1984)– Predicts initial Z-linkage when SA genes are dominant– Predict no bias once sex-limited
• Sexual selection: ornament-preference coevolution– Predicts faster evolution of female preference genes when there
are X-linked or autosomal ornaments and X-linked preferences (Kirkpatrick & Hall, 2004)
• Genomic conflict– Predicts faster evolution of female preference genes for X-linked
indicators of X-chromosome meiotic drive (Lande & Wilkinson, 1999)
![Page 2: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why does mode of inheritance matter?
Female Male
ZW ZZ
Female heterogamety
Male Female
XY XX
Male heterogamety
X-linked genes spend less time in males while Z-linked genesspend more time in males, compared to autosomal genes.
1. Sexual selection operates directly on males, indirectly on females.
![Page 3: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why does mode of inheritance matter?
Linkage disequilibrium arises due to joint inheritance of ornament and preference genes
Male Female
XY XX
X-linked
Male Female
XY XX
Autosomal
2. Linkage disequilibrium between trait and preference depends on mode
![Page 4: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Preference-display inheritance
Pre
fere
nce
c ha n
g e
better
Thre
s ho l
d pr
efer
e nc e
better
Sexual selection and sex chromosomes(Kirkpatrick & Hall, 2004)
*
**
![Page 5: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Do sexually selected traits exhibit sex-linkage?
• Are genes for sexually selected traits sex-linked?– YES – X
• Drosophila, mammals (Reinhold, 1998)• human reproductive traits (Saifa & Chandra
1999; Lercher et al. 2003)– YES – Z
• Butterflies (Prowell 1998; Iyengar 2002)• Birds (Saether et al. 2007; Wright 2005)
• Are genes with male-biased expression X-linked?– NO - under-represented
• Drosophila soma (Parisi et al., 2003)
– YES - over-represented• mosquitoes (Hahn & Lanzaro, 2005)• mouse spermatogonia (Wang et al. 2001; Yang
2006)
![Page 6: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Outline• Stalk-eyed flies as a model for studying a sexually
selected trait• What regions (QTL) influence eyestalk
expression?• Which genes are expressed during eyestalk
development?• Does sex linkage influence the rate of evolution of
eyestalk genes?• Does sex linkage influence the expression of
eyestalk genes?
![Page 7: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
14 nuclear genesfull mtDNA genomes
Wiegmann et al. unpub.
Eyestalks have evolved in 8 families of Acalyptrate flies
![Page 8: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Exaggerated eyestalks occur only in male flies
Achias rothschildiPlatystomatidae (New Guinea)
Diopsosoma primaPeriscelididae (Brazil)
Richardia telescopicaRichardiidae (Peru) Teleopsis whitei
Diopsidae (Malaysia)
![Page 9: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Eye-Stalk Sexual Dimorphism has evolved repeatedly in DiopsidsTeloglabrus entabenensis
Dias. dubia
Dias. silvatica
Dias. obstans
Dias. fasciata
Dias. sp.F
Dias. sp.W
Dias. albifacies
Dias. sp.Q
Dias. meigeni
Dias. conjuncta
Dias. nebulosa
Dias. aethiopica
Dias. elongata
Dias. longipedunculata
Dias. hirsutu
Teleo. breviscopium
Teleo. rubicunda
Teleo. quadriguttata
Cyrto. dalmanni
Cyrto. whitei
Cyrto. quinqueguttata
Eurydiopsis subnottata
Diopsis apicalis
Diopsis fumipennis
Diopsis gnu
Sphyr. munroi
Sphyr. brevicornis
Sphyr. detrahens
Sphyr. beccarri
Monomorphic
EquivocalDimorphic
Most parsimonious reconstruction of sexual dimorphism in eyespan.
Body length
Eye
span
MalesFemales
![Page 10: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Baker & Wilkinson 2001 Evolution
Sexual dimorphism evolves due to change in male eye span-body length allometry
Independent contrasts
Male slope Female slope
Sex
ual d
imor
phis
m
![Page 11: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Teleopsis populations are genetically and reproductively isolated
NJ phylogram:
535 bp COII mtDNA535 bp 16s mtDNA655 bp wingless intron
Swallow et al. 2005 Mol. Ecol.
Belalong
Cameron/Langat
Bogor
Soraya
Bt Lawang
Gombak
Brastagi
Gombak
Chiang Mai
Bt Ringit
0.005 substitutions/site
100
T. dalmanni
T. whitei
T. quinquegutatta
100
100
100
100100
93
100
100
86
90
100
99
100
2.5 - 11 MYA
![Page 12: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Male eyespan is under sexual selectionMales with longer eyespan roost and mate with more females (Wilkinson & Reillo 1994)
Eyespan is condition dependent, but relative eyespan has a genetic basis (Wilkinson & Taper 1999; David et al. 2000)
Male with longer relative eyespan are preferred by females (Wilkinson et al. 1998; Hingle et al. 2001)
Male with longer relative eyespan win contests (Panhuis et al. 1999)
![Page 13: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Outline• Why use stalk-eyed flies as a model for studying
sexually selection traits?• Which genomic regions (QTL) influence eyestalk
expression?• Which genes are expressed during eyestalk
development?• Does sex linkage influence the rate of evolution of
eyestalk genes?• Does sex linkage influence the expression of
eyestalk genes?
![Page 14: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Selection on male eye span alters brood sex ratios
Wilkinson et al. 1998 Nature
Realized responsein eyespan
![Page 15: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
X drive can catalyze sexual selection
• If a male ornament indicates absence of the driving X chromosome
• then, choosy females, which avoid mating with SR males, will produce more grandchildren as long as there are more females than males in the population
• This process leads to rapid evolution of an autosomal female preference when genes for an ornament are linked to X drive
• Occasional recombination (or imprecise female choice) is necessary otherwise sexual selection should eliminate drive
Lande and Wilkinson 1999 Genet Res
![Page 16: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
QTL mapping of eye span
Gen 45 intercrossXDYL-XXH
738 flies (2 families)468 females270 males
Gen 30 intercrossXYH-XXL
490 flies (1 family)231 females259 males
![Page 17: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Female-biased broods are due to X driveN
umbe
r of m
ales
test
ed
![Page 18: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Chr 1 Chr 2
Chr XD
Chr X
Gen 30 F2 intercrossXY-XX
Gen 45 F2 intercrossXDY-XX
Drive X fails to recombine
![Page 19: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
QTL for relative eye span
Johns et al. 2005 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
![Page 20: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
QTL for relative eye span
Johns et al. 2005 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
![Page 21: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Eye span indicates drive X
XD
Thus, females that choose long eye span mates produce more sons
![Page 22: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Only dimorphic Teleopsis populations carry SR
10 changes
Wilkinson et al, 2003
C. dalm
anniC
. whitei
C. q.
= SR frequency
Sumatra
Sumatra
Pen Malaysia
Java
Pen Malaysia
Pen Malaysia
Thailand
![Page 23: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Drive X evolves rapidly
70167125106
395
crc
71
312
21
6
18
2 X-linked regions autosomal gene
Number of segregating sites in 3 Kb sequence
Gom
bak
Driv
eN
= 1
1 m
ales
Gom
bak
Non
-driv
eN
= 1
4 m
ales
Sor
aya
N =
13
mal
es
25 29
14 13
0 13
![Page 24: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Drive X evolves independently of autosomal genes
2 X regions 2 autosomal regions
Note that drive X lacks variation and is derived from nondrive X chromosomes
70167125106
395
crc
71
312
21
6
18
![Page 25: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Drive X influences other traits
• Sperm length (drive sperm are shorter)• Sperm storage organ size in females• Sperm competition (drive sperm are less
competitive)• Male fertility (drive males are less fertile)• Mating rate (drive males mate less often)• Female fecundity (heterozygous females
produce more offspring)
• Consistent with a chromosomal region rather than a single pleiotropic gene
![Page 26: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Outline• Why use stalk-eyed flies as a model for studying
sexually selection?• What genomic regions (QTL) influence eyestalk
expression?• Which genes are expressed during eyestalk
development?• Does sex linkage influence the rate of evolution of
eyestalk genes?• Does sex linkage influence the expression of
eyestalk genes?
![Page 27: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
EST Sequencing and Analysis• cDNA libraries were made from C. dalmanni eye-
antennal imaginal discs at 3 stages:– wandering larvae– 1-3 d pupae– 4-7 d pupae
• 24192 cDNAs were bidirectionally sequenced and annotated using the JGI EST pipeline and FlyBase
• EST assembly summary– Total # of high quality ESTs 33,229– # of clusters in assembly 7,066– # clusters w/ significant (e-9) Blast hits 4,422– # of unique protein genes 3,487– # ORFs > 300 bp w/out Blast hit 186– Average unique sequence per gene 1.65 Kb
Larval brain + eye disc
Eye-antennal imaginal disc
![Page 28: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
EST representation in GO categories essential to eye-stalk development
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
regulation of body size
cell growth
regulation of cell size
morphogenesis of an epithelium
actin cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis
Wnt/N/smo/fz/TGFb/InR signaling pathways
axonogenesis
growth
eye development
regulation of cell shape
eye-antennal disc morphogenesis
metamorphosis
cell motility
% of D.m. genes in EST database
![Page 29: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Pre-pupalPupal 1-3Pupal 4-6
GO categories that exhibit over-representation with respect to developmental stage
0.0000
0.1000
0.2000
0.3000
0.4000
0.5000
0.6000
0.7000
0.8000
0.9000
All Gen
es
meiosis
embryo
nic morphogen
esis
anato
mical s
tructu
re form
ation
cell p
rolife
ration
transc
riptio
n
smoothen
ed si
gnaling path
way
axonogen
esis
protein fo
lding
carb
ohydrat
e meta
bolism
transm
ission of n
erve i
mpulse
structu
ral co
nstituen
t of c
uticle
Cuticular protein 30BCuticular protein 30FCuticular protein 49AaCuticular protein 49AcCuticular protein 49AeCuticular protein 56FCuticular protein 57ACuticular protein 62BbCuticular protein 62BcCuticular protein 64AcCuticular protein 65EcCuticular protein 66CaCuticular protein 66CbCuticular protein 66DCuticular protein 67Fa1Cuticular protein 76BdCuticular protein 92FCuticular protein 97EaCuticular protein 97EbCuticular protein 100A
Developmental Time
![Page 30: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Outline• Why use stalk-eyed flies as a model for studying
sexually selection?• What genomic regions (QTL) influence eyestalk
expression?• Which genes are expressed during eyestalk
development?• Does sex linkage influence the rate of evolution of
eyestalk genes?• Does sex linkage influence the expression of
eyestalk genes?
![Page 31: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Identifying sex-linked genes by CGH
• Designed custom 44K oligoarray– 60 bp oligo probes– 6-10 nonoverlapping probes/gene– 3,400 genes from EST library– ~200 ORFs
• Hybridize male and female genomic DNA– 4 replicates/sex/species– 4 Teleopsis species
• Expect X-linked genes in females to have 2-fold intensity of males
![Page 32: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
CGH chromosome inference:T. dalmanni
Freq
uenc
y
Median log2(F/M intensity)
Autosomal X
-7.5
Y
![Page 33: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Freq
uenc
y
Median log2(F/M intensity)
Autosomal X
-7.5
Y
CGH chromosome inference:T. dalmanni
A X Y
A 27 0 0
X 0 7 0
Y 0 0 1
Chr Prediction
Chr
con
firm
atio
n
35/35 correct = 100%
PCR confirmation
![Page 34: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Teleopsis has a neo-X = Dm 2L
Left neo-X
Moved onto neo-X
![Page 35: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Schaeffer et al. 2008 Genetics
Note 1: Muller element A is the ancestral X
Note 2: X drive is common in obscura group flies, which have a fused X and also have a new Y chromosome which contains genes not on XR (Carvalho et al 2009)
Muller elements in Drosophila
Y replacement
![Page 36: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Drosophila-Anopheles
synteny
53% of X-linked genes in A. gambiae are X-linked in D. melanogaster
Zdobnov et al. 2002 Science
Drosophila-Anopheles shared a common ancestor ~ 260 MYA
![Page 37: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
T. dalmanni - D. melanogaster synteny
Td chromosomeMuller element A+D C+E B
Gene movement ->
![Page 38: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
CGH chromosome inference:T. quinqueguttata
Freq
uenc
y
Median log2(M/F intensity)
Autosomal XY
-5.0
![Page 39: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Median log2(CD M/F intensity)
Med
ian
log 2
(CQ
M/F
inte
nsity
)
Autosome
A X YA 3105 17 1X 12 560 0Y 2 0 0
Cd chr
Cqchr
2 = 2392P < 0.0001
X
XA
utosome
Recent gene movement
![Page 40: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Gene movement to X is associated with increased dimorphism in Teleopsis
Genes may leave X chromosome to avoid X chromosome inactivation during meiosis
![Page 41: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Sequence divergence using relative branch lengths
To identify genes that evolve faster in stalk-eyed flies than in Drosophila, we used relative branch lengths
All conseqs translated and aligned to transcript/gene alignments for 3 Drosophila species and Anopheles. Alignments for conseqs from same gene were concatenated prior to BL estimate. Trees constrained to ‘known’ topology generated with PhyML.
Distance measure: T.d. branch length / tree length
A. g.
D. m.
C. d.
D. p.
D. v.
A. g.
D. m.
C. d.
D. p.
D. v.scramb1:
CG10561:
![Page 42: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Transposed genes show faster divergence
Teleopsis chromosomal location
Tel
eops
is b
ranc
h pr
op.
![Page 43: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Sequence divergence by CGH
“Rec
ent”
gene
div
erge
nce
(Cd(
m+f
) - C
q(m
+f))
/(Cd(
m+f
) + C
q(m
+f))
Dm-Cd divergence (1-BlastX)
R2 = 0.23, P < 0.0001
To identify genes that have evolved rapidly between the dimorphic and monomorphic stalk-eyed flies, we used the relative difference in total signal intensity from the CGH microarray
![Page 44: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
CGH divergence and ancestral X movement
source F PCd-Cq div 9.4 < 0.0001
Note: excludes unique Cd genes (unknown location in Dm)
CD-CQ divergence is highest for Dm genes which move on or off the X in Cd
![Page 45: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
CGH divergence by Dm chromosome arm
*
source F PDm arm 32.4 < 0.0001
Divergence of eyespan genes is greatest for genes which are unique to C dalmanni
![Page 46: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Gene Duplication in EST Database
• Tentatively assigned clusters as paralogs if >10% amino acid divergence for aligned regions and all clusters are monophyletic relative to D. mel and D. pseudo homologs
• Found 20 gene duplicates. Over-represented for genes involved in spermatogenesis and mRNA binding
• Possible duplicates: 234 cases in which two or more clusters had the top Blast hit to overlapping regions of the same D.m. gene
Cd B.Law crolA
Cd Gombak crolA
Cd Soraya crolA
Cd B.Law crolB
Cd Gombak crol
Cd B.Law crol
Cd Soraya crol
Cd Brunei crol
Cd Bogor crol
Cd Langat crol
Cw crol
Cd Bras crol
.40
.44
.67
.46
.50
1.15
1.18
.55
1.01
2.38
1.21
1.57
.16
.34.56
.50
.27
.77
.31
.38
.17
dN/dS
• Example: crooked legs, 3 copies confirmed by phylogenetic analysis of ~ 1700 bp of crol genes for 7 populations of C. dalmanni + C. whitei
xxxxxxxxxxx
zinc finger protein - 10 domainsCd Gom crol
Cd Gom crolA
![Page 47: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Sex-linkage and gene duplication
• Gene duplications (21) preferentially involve neo-X– 11 homologs on neo-X (Dm 2L) and 10 on ancestral A– 2 = 14.1, P = 0.0002
• Genes involved in duplications are more likely to move chromosomes– 10 genes in 21 sets moved chromosomes (exp 2.8%)– 2 = 31.0, P < 0.0001
• Duplicate copies preferentially move off neo-X– 7 X -> A; 2 A -> X; 1 A -> Y
![Page 48: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Sex-linkage and gene duplication evolution
-> X (Cd-Cq div: 0.48)-> auto (Cd-Cq div: 0.79)
-> 3R
-> 2R-> 2
One autosome -> X duplication/translocation:
Six autosome duplications: Mean CGH divergence change = 0.15 ± 0.04
![Page 49: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Outline• Why use stalk-eyed flies as a model for studying
sexually selection?• What genomic regions (QTL) influence eyestalk
expression?• Which genes are expressed during eyestalk
development?• Does sex linkage influence the rate of evolution of
eyestalk genes?• Does sex linkage influence the expression of
eyestalk genes?
![Page 50: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Sex-bias by species gene expression
• Comparison– Male vs female T. dalmanni and T. quinqueguttata– Using probes with least divergence in CGH
• Method– Sample: eye-antennal imaginal discs from 25
wandering larvae– Sex: genotyped larvae using X & Y-linked
microsat markers, then pooled discs by sex– Replicates: 8 samples/sex/spp with dye swap– Hybridized to 44k custom oligoarrays
• 5 nonoverlapping probes/gene• each probe printed in duplicate• 3320 unique genes• Used normalized (intensity – background) intensity
– Averaged log2(M/F intensity) over probes/gene
&
![Page 51: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Sex-bias x species gene expression
SAM ANOVA569/1922 genes FDR < 0.1%
![Page 52: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Sex-biased expression, sexual dimorphism and sex linkage
Ave
rage
log 2
(M/F
) exp
ress
ion
![Page 53: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Ave
rage
log 2
(M/F
) exp
ress
ion
Sex-biased expression, sexual dimorphism and gene movement
![Page 54: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Gene name Dm Td Tqcapulet 2L A XRNA polymerase II 215kD subunit X A YORF-65 X Aextradenticle X X Aaubergine 2L X ADeoxyribonuclease II 3R X AORF-25 X ASpindly 2L X ACG9246 2L X ALa autoantigen-like 2L X ARan GTPase activating protein 2L X Amitochondrial ribosomal protein L28 2L X APendulin 2L X Amsb1l 2L X ACG3305 2L X ACG14341 2L X ACG7870 2L X A
Sex-biased gene expression and gene movement among Teleopsis
![Page 55: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Conclusions
• Exaggerated eyestalks are influenced by X-linked genes– X chromosome drive likely has influenced sexual selection and
may have facilitated evolutionary change due to restricted recombination.
• X chromosome history influences divergence rates– Gene movement on or off the X results in faster divergence.– Unique stalk-eyed fly genes evolve faster between sexually
monomorphic and dimorphic species– Gene duplications preferentially involve neo-X
• X linkage and history influence gene expression– Sexual dimorphism is associated with female bias among X-linked
genes– Genes that moved off the X show male-biased expression while
those that joined the X show female-biased expression in the dimorphic species, consistent with sexual conflict
![Page 56: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
AcknowledgementsCollaborator:
Rick Baker (AMNH)
Postdocs:Philip Johns (Bard College)Xianhui WangLeanna Birge (UCL)
Technicians:Marie PittsSarah Josway
Graduate students:Sarah ChristiansonJackie Metheny
Undergraduates: Cara Brand
and many others!
![Page 57: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
![Page 58: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Gene expression between lines
• Comparison– High vs low lines after 50 generations
of selection on relative eye span• Method:
– Sample: eye-antennal imaginal discs from 25 wandering larvae
– Replicates: 8 samples per line, with dye swap
– Hybridized to 44k custom oligoarrays• three nonoverlapping oligos/gene• each oligo printed in triplicate• 3320 unique genes
– Average log2(H/L intensity) over probes/gene
![Page 59: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Biased gene expression between lines
SAM (FDR = < 1%)176 biased clusters; 111 genes
19 sig genes unique to Cd
![Page 60: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Gene expression and ancestral X transposition
source F PCd-Dm chr 1.6 0.19
N = 2969; excludes Cd genes with unknown location in Dm
![Page 61: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Gene expression and recent sex chromosome transposition
source F PCq-Cd chr 1.06 0.38
N = 3053; includes Cd genes with unknown location in Dm
![Page 62: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Gene expression by chromosome arm
Biased expression is greatest for
• 154 Cd genes which are not detected in Dm
• No effect of Cd X chromosome
*
source F PDm arm 9.0 < 0.0001
Cd chr 1.0 0.322
![Page 63: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Where do drive chromosomes come from?
Hypothesis: drive chromosomes arise when new sex chromosomes evolve
because suppressors are initially absent
![Page 64: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Biased sex ratios in medfliescaused by B chromosomes
Basso et al. 2009 PLoS One
Percent malesY+B X+B
![Page 65: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Where do drive chromosomes come from?
Hypothesis: drive chromosomes arise when new sex chromosomes appear,
which in flies may be initiated by fusions of B chromosomes or other
elements
![Page 66: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Candidate genes for expression regulation
Single amino-acid repeat polymorphisms (SARPs)– Common in coding sequences of transcription factors– Repeat expansions/contractions occur more often than point mutations– Can enhance or suppress transcription in a length dependent manner
Fondon & Gardner 2004
![Page 67: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Q L F N S T A C D E G I Y P K V R H M W
AA repeat > 8 bp (N = 129)
AA abundance (N = 1651205)
Single amino-acid repeats in C. dalmanni EST database
Amino acid code
Pro
porti
on
Q repeat genes are most commonTranscription factors are over-representedGene divergence is less than for other genes
![Page 68: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
For homologous genes, Q repeats are longer in Cd than Dm
X AQ rep 9 54
all genes 542 2894
Chromosome location does not influence repeat length or purity
No. Cd - Dm Q repeats per gene
![Page 69: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Q repeats vary in length between populations
Cd_CRC-A: 6 VLTQLTPPHSPPQTAASSAFPNASIETSTNVNDAPF-QVSSTPPLASPVQI--------- 55Dm_CRC-A: 148 ILQQLTPPQSPPQ------F------------DA-YKQAGDAQP--KPVLVKAEQKVQCY 186
Cd_CRC-A: 56 ---VTNDKFGSSAVQPTFLNFNNWQQQQQQQQQQQQEQQQQQNQHSTVGALNNEFNVDIA 112Dm_CRC-A: 187 TPDVTH---AASAT-P-F-NFTNW-----------------------VGG--SE----IA 211
Cd_CRC-A: 113 REMQIVDEIVNKRVKEL-FDSN----NDDCESMSSYSAPSQIES-ST-----------DE 155Dm_CRC-A: 212 RENQLVDDIVNMRAKELELSTNWQQLNEDCESQAS----SSLDSRSTGSGVCSSIADADE 267
Cd_CRC-A: 156 EWMP---CSSYSSAGSSPVHNGCEESSLKATATNGS--KKRTRPYGRGIEDRKLRKKEQN 210Dm_CRC-A: 268 DWVPELISSS-----SSPAPTTIEQSA--------SQPKKRTRTYGRGVEDRKIRKKEQN 314
Cd_CRC-A: 211 KNAATRYRQKKKLEMENVLSEEQQLTQRNDELKRILSDR 249Dm_CRC-A: 315 KNAATRYRQKKKLEMENVLGEEHVLSKENEQLRRTLQER 353
No Q repeats for D. melanogaster homologue in 4 of 63 genes, e.g.crc (cryptocephal): Ecdysone-regulated transcription factor
![Page 70: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
X-linked Q repeat genes tend to be more polymorphic
F = 4.31P = 0.051
![Page 71: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Q repeat gene association study
275...298.
299.
300.
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Sires(n = 300)
Dams(n = 300)
Offspring(n = 2000)
Breeding values/family
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
X =
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
1.
2.
3....25.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
HQQQQQQQQQQL........................................................................................................................
Progeny breeding values
(n = 50 fams)
ParentalGenotypes
HQQQQ---QQQQQQL.....QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ.......
A. Screen variable loci (n=32)
![Page 72: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
A. Autosomal loci screen Female LS-ES Male LS-ES 1 2 3 Locus F P F P N 4 5 6 Bar1 0.45 0.77 0.62 0.65 92 7 Bifocal 1.46 0.20 1.89 0.09 91 8 CG4409 1.43 0.24 1.38 0.26 92 9 CG10082 1.57 0.18 1.77 0.13 88 10 CG10321 0.8 0.49 1.82 0.13 88 11 CG10435 0.04 0.85 0.04 0.84 89 12 CG11848 6.01 0.0002 4.72 0.0016 98 13 CG12104 3.19 0.046 2.09 0.13 89 14 CG31064 0.35 0.93 0.69 0.68 98 15 CG31224 1.11 0.37 1.76 0.10 73 16 CG32133 1.25 0.28 2.84 0.0079 88 17 CG33692 2.98 0.011 3.16 0.0074 98 18 CG34347 0.66 0.78 1.01 0.45 89 19 Cap-n-collar 0.55 0.58 0.57 0.57 89 20 Corto 2.25 0.022 2.59 0.0087 96 21 Domino 1.58 0.11 2.04 0.029 85 22 E5 0.85 0.43 0.90 0.41 84 23 Ecdysone-induced protein 75B 2.71 0.07 6.13 0.0032 91 24 Grainy head 1.09 0.38 1.38 0.22 86 25 M-spondin 0.37 0.83 0.75 0.56 87 26 Mastermind 1.52 0.21 2.19 0.08 88 27 SRPK 1.95 0.06 2.54 0.015 99 28 Tenascin major 0.56 0.57 1.91 0.15 90 29 Toutatis 1.07 0.40 1.23 0.28 89 30 Trachealess 0.82 0.44 3.00 0.055 92 31 32
![Page 73: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
A. X-linked loci screen Female LS-ES Male LS-ES 1 2 3 Locus Parent F P F P N 4 5 6 Bunched Male 0.22 0.80 0.42 0.66 45 7 Female 0.71 0.62 0.88 0.50 45 8
9 CG8668 Male 0.65 0.69 0.60 0.73 48 10 Female 0.64 0.77 1.18 0.34 46 11
12 CG10107 Male 4.18 0.011 3.03 0.039 48 13 Female 0.99 0.46 0.97 0.47 49 14
15 CG31738 Male 2.04 0.12 1.87 0.15 49 16 Female 0.81 0.55 1.83 0.13 50 17
18 Cryptocephal Male 0.82 0.54 1.28 0.29 50 19 Female 0.33 0.92 0.71 0.65 49 20 21
![Page 74: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Q repeat gene association study
275...298.
299.
300.
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Sires(n = 300)
Dams(n = 300)
Offspring(n = 2000)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
X =
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
1.
2.
3....25.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
HQQQQQQQQQQL........................................................................................................................
Progeny breeding values
(n = 50 fams)
ParentalGenotypes
HQQQQ---QQQQQQL.....QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ.......
A. Screen variable loci (n=32)
B. Confirm associations
HQQQQQQQQQQL........................................................................................................................
Progeny phenotypes
(n > 300)
ProgenyGenotypes
HQQQQ---QQQQQQL.....QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ............QQQ.......
![Page 75: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
B. Progeny genotype-phenotype associations Females Males 1 2 So urce of variat ion df Va r Comp% F P df Var Comp% F P 3 4 5 CG33 692 (1) 6 Famil y 5 37. 3 13. 2 < 0.00 01 5 38. 6 18. 2 < 0.0001 7 Ge notype 7 5.6 2.7 0.01 1 7 6.8 3.5 0.0013 8 Erro r 168 200 9 10 Ecdysone -induced protein 75b (1) 11 Famil y 4 32. 9 14. 3 < 0.000 1 4 43. 3 19. 2 < 0.0001 12 Ge notype 2 5.4 4.6 0.01 2 2 1.2 1.8 0.18 13 Erro r 134 119 14 15 CG11 848 (2) 16 Famil y 5 36.9 14. 5 < 0.000 1 5 53. 6 31. 7 < 0.0001 17 Ge notype 4 2.0 1.7 0.1 6 4 1.1 1.6 0.17 18 Erro r 177 202 19 20 Corto (2) 21 Famil y 5 33. 7 10. 5 < 0.000 1 5 46. 1 18. 4 < 0.00 01 22 Ge notype 9 4.9 2.1 0.03 5 9 1.1 1.3 0.23 23 Erro r 175 200 24 25 CG10 107 (X) 26 Famil y 4 47. 7 16. 2 < 0.0 001 4 50. 6 22. 6 < 0.0001 27 Ge notype 5 -1.0 0.7 0.5 9 5 6.5 4.5 0.0049 28 Erro r 143 144 29 30
![Page 76: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Genotype-phenotype associations
B. Progeny phenotypes by progeny genotypes
A. Progeny breeding values by parent genotypesCG33692 Dm X -> Cd A
CG10107 Dm A -> Cd X
Cq A -> Cd X
![Page 77: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Multiple SR haplotypes occur in a populationM
icro
sate
llite
hap
loty
pe
(ms1
25, 2
44, 3
95 b
ps)
Screen of 89 Gombak males at 3 X-linked microsatellite loci
Wilkinson et al, 2006
![Page 78: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
If there is an arms race between a drive X and suppressors in
each population, then matings between populations should
reveal cryptic drive
![Page 79: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Reproductive isolation increases with genetic distance
(reciprocal matings among 8 populations)
Each data point represents average values from 16 cages containing 1 male and 3 females
Christianson et al. (2005) Evolution
Matings/h Progeny/2 wks
![Page 80: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Cross-population matings produce sterile male, fertile female progeny
(Haldane’s Rule)
Pro
porti
on h
ybrid
s fe
rtile
Gombak (Malaysia) x Soraya (Sumatra)
Christianson & Wilkinson 2005 Evol
between parental populations
![Page 81: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Mapping cryptic drive
GBX(n = 438)
SBX(n = 261)
Determine brood sex ratios for all fertile BX progenyGenotype all progeny at 30 microsatellite loci
![Page 82: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Intact X is required for fertility70167125106
395
crc
71
312
21
6
18
GBX SBX
# S alleles
Fertile Sterile
0 159 123
> 1 6 152
# G alleles
Fertile Sterile
0 121 108
> 1 0 21
70167125106
395
crc
71
312
21
6
18
![Page 83: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Proportion male progeny
GSRX chromosome is lost presumably because it causes hybrid inviability.
Chr 1
****
One region on chr 1 is associated with female-bias
SBX reveals female-biasing modifiers
![Page 84: Evolutionary reasons for sex linkage](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/5681669e550346895dda89be/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
GSRX chromosome is present, but unrelated to male-biased sex ratios
Proportion male progeny
Chr 1 Chr 2
***
***
****
***
*****
Parts of chr 1 and 2 are associated with male-bias
GBX reveals male biasing modifiers